Thứ Bảy, 1 tháng 12, 2018

News on Youtube Dec 1 2018

What I love most... I love most the individuals who are

anxious who are apprehensive you have the ones who just don't want to be there

you open up to them you get them open up to you you have the relationship

eventually I think that's one of the great things about her is to have that

kind of personality trait there's like that instant chemistry that you build

with your doctor I think that is just phenomenal. If you're open and honest with

them they'll open up and you'll have their trust and they're just like I love it.

There's something about it it's the heart

and the love. I love everything about it

For more infomation >> Dr. Dominique Knox - Capitol Dental Associates Washington, DC - Duration: 0:45.

-------------------------------------------

Washington County Justice of the Peace Sues County Judge and Others fox - Duration: 1:25.

For more infomation >> Washington County Justice of the Peace Sues County Judge and Others fox - Duration: 1:25.

-------------------------------------------

Dental Care In the Heart Of DC - Capitol Dental Associates Washington, DC - Duration: 1:08.

We really are in like prime location. It's the perfect location it's right

across the street from Nats Stadium. You have the Wharf, you have Navy Yard we've

got the Navy Yards that are right next door. Because of the fact that we are right

there near a lot of those corporate offices, if you do have some free time

during your lunch break, I mean it is so convenient to just walk right across

the street. If you work downtown you can walk from work. It's in the heart of DC.

We are definitely big on quality and the speed and the delivery of service.

Our goal is to be able to see you see, you get you in, treat you, and get

you on your way. When people walk in we always have like that, Wow! Everyone's always like whoa is this

new? How much technology you just had there in that small location.

State-of-the-art service, digital scans, 3d x-rays, the best imaging possible and

we offer the best. Here at Capital Dental Associates we can provide you with the

best care the best equipment as well as the best technology here every single

time that you walk in.

For more infomation >> Dental Care In the Heart Of DC - Capitol Dental Associates Washington, DC - Duration: 1:08.

-------------------------------------------

Dr. Israel Saintil - Capitol Dental Associates Washington, DC - Duration: 0:59.

I wanted to work with kids to be able to transform a child's perspective from when they first

come in and you know they're fearful they don't know what's going on to be able to sit

down and break it down to them and let them know that these are the things that I'm going

to be doing and this is how it's going to turn out If you're able to take that and bring

them to a state of happiness that way they love coming to the dentist, um, that's the

greatest part of the job for me.

I'm a big kid myself I love to laugh kids are funny I've learned to tap into my inner

child I think kids connect when they talk to someone that they feel like is on their

side and they feel you know that's like them.

I absolutely love my job.

It's the best thing to ever happen to me.

It allows me to have a hand in shaping the future of America because the kids are our

future.

For more infomation >> Dr. Israel Saintil - Capitol Dental Associates Washington, DC - Duration: 0:59.

-------------------------------------------

The Democratic majoritys first order of business Restore democracy The Washington Post - Duration: 3:04.

The Democratic majoritys first order of business Restore democracy The Washington Post

Nancy Pelosi represents Californias 12th Congressional District and is Democratic leader in the House of Representatives. John Sarbanes, a Democrat, represents Marylands 3rd Congressional District.

Earlier this month, Americans went to the polls and sent a powerful message: The election not only was a resounding verdict against Republicans assault on Americans health care and wages, but also it was a vote to rescue our broken democracy.

In the face of a torrent of special interest dark money, partisan gerrymandering and devious vote suppression schemes, voters elected a House Democratic majority determined to bring real change to restore our democracy.

During the campaign, Democrats declared unequivocally that we would clean up corruption to make Washington work for the people. We pledged to reduce the role of money in politics, to restore ethics and integrity to government, and to strengthen voting laws.

We now have our marching orders. The new Democratic House is ready to deliver with H.R. 1: a bold reform package to restore the promise of our democracy — a government of, by and for the people.

First, lets end the dominance of money in politics. For far too long, big money and corporate special interests have undermined the will of the people and subverted policymaking in Washington — enabling soaring health care costs and prescription drug prices, undermining clean air and clean water for our children, and blocking long overdue wage increases for hard working Americans.

So lets rein in the unaccountable dark money unleashed by the Supreme Courts Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision by requiring all political organizations to disclose their donors, and by shutting down the shell game of big money donations to super PACs. We must also empower hard working Americans in our democracy by building a 21st century campaign finance system — combining small donor incentives and matching support — to increase and multiply the power of small donors. Wealthy special interests shouldnt be able to buy more influence than the workers, consumers and families who should be our priority in Washington.

Next, lets make sure that when public servants get to Washington, they serve the public. Restoring the publics trust means closing the revolving door between government and private industries, and imposing strong new ethics laws to stop officials from using their public office for personal gain. To do so, we will expand conflict of interest laws, ban members of Congress from serving on for profit boards, revamp the oversight authority of the Office of Government Ethics, and prohibit public servants from receiving bonus payments from their former employers to enter government. Well curb the influence of high powered Washington insiders by closing lobbyist registration loopholes that allow big money power brokers and foreign actors to operate in the shadows. That way, well connected special interests wont be able to steer the policy agenda away from the priorities of the American public.

Finally, lets make it easier, not harder, to vote. Since the Supreme Court took the teeth out of the Voting Rights Act, Republican political operatives have increasingly turned to blatant schemes to make it more difficult for the Americans left behind to participate in elections — a narrow agenda all too often targeted at communities of color.

We must renew the Voting Rights Act to protect every citizens access to the ballot box and restore the vital safeguard of pre clearance requirements for areas with a history of voter suppression. We will promote national automatic voter registration, bolster our critical election infrastructure against foreign attackers, and put an end to partisan gerrymandering once and for all by establishing federal guidelines to outlaw the practice. No American should face hours long lines, broken voting machines or rules rigged to keep their vote from being counted in our elections.

These are the reforms that will ultimately change the balance of power in Washington. When we get dark money out of politics, clean up corruption and ensure fair elections, we will dismantle the ability of special interests to stack the deck of our democracy and our economy against hard working Americans.

And with a system that works for the people, we will deliver policy outcomes that make life better for all Americans: We will lower health care costs and out of control prices for prescription drugs. We will rebuild the United States infrastructure, raise the minimum wage and put leverage back in the hands of workers and consumers. We will finally advance common sense, bipartisan solutions to prevent gun violence. We will confront discrimination with the Equality Act , pass the Dream Act to protect the patriotic young undocumented immigrants who came here as children, and take the first step toward comprehensive immigration reform.

We have a responsibility to honor the vision of our founders, the sacrifices made to expand the right to vote and our duty to the American people. With bold action to fix what is broken in our democracy, we can make progress for working families and renew Americans trust in Congress to tackle the issues that matter most.

Read more:

Marc A. Thiessen: What Trump needs to do to avoid being a one term president

Katrina vanden Heuvel: How Democrats can turn up the heat on Trump — and win the battle of ideas

Dana Milbank: This is what happens when a stable genius leads a stupid country

Richard Cohen: Democrats want to dump Pelosi? Thats just plain dumb.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.

For more infomation >> The Democratic majoritys first order of business Restore democracy The Washington Post - Duration: 3:04.

-------------------------------------------

We Believe in Healthy Smiles - Capitol Dental Associates Washington, DC - Duration: 1:53.

Here at Capitol Dental Associates we obviously want to make sure your

experience is as easy and as simple as it possibly can be

We are definitely big on quality and the speed and the delivery of service.

Our goal is to be able to see you, get you in, treat you, then get you on your way.

We really are in the prime location.

It's the perfect location.

It's in the heart of DC.

Because of the fact that we are right there near a lot of corporate offices

if you do have some free time during your lunch great I mean it is so convenient

to just walk right across the street.

When people walk in we always have like that Wow!

everyone's always like whoa, is this new?

In the office we offer state-of-the-art equipment, digital scans, 3d x-rays, the best imaging possible from

cleanings to implants we offer it all and we offer the best.

Here at Capitol Dental Associates, whenever you do come into the door, more than likely you will see

one doctor that's there but in reality you're actually getting three doctors with

different opinions. The knowledge base is collaborative

I love the doctors I work with. I absolutely love working with them so

that is the most rewarding aspect is like we have this collaborative effort

that we have accomplished together to have the opportunity to be able to

change someone's life and that's what we all got into this floor it's not just

the mouth we're treating, it's a person.

When people who trust me with their lives and

their mouths I take that portion of the job seriously. If you're open and honest

with them they'll open up and you'll have their trust. Just to have that trust

and to be able to deliver that's the best part of the job. Here at Capital

Dental we make it our personal as well as our professional goal to improve your

smile and to change your life every single time that you walk in here.

For more infomation >> We Believe in Healthy Smiles - Capitol Dental Associates Washington, DC - Duration: 1:53.

-------------------------------------------

Dr. Charles White - Capitol Dental Associates Washington, DC - Duration: 1:10.

I guess I knew I wanted to be a dentist at a very young age. 12 years old

I actually went to go shadow my dentist Michigan and he was so kind to me I just

remember feeling oh man this is how I want to make people feel one of my

favorite things about being a dentist is getting to know my patients it's not

just the mouth we're treating, it's a person there's such a strong personal

connection that's involved and honestly that makes my job wonderful clients'

happiness is the backbone of our practice if they're not happy we're not

happy that smile I mean that smile says so much when you see that final product

it almost feels like a team that's won the championship we have this

collaborative effort that we have accomplished together to be charged with

that the chance to be able to help somebody is is absolutely remarkable to

have the opportunity to be able to change someone's life and that's what we

all got into this for the fact that I can wake up and come to an office and be

able to say this is what I love to do I would just wake up and just do this

phenomenal phenomenal

For more infomation >> Dr. Charles White - Capitol Dental Associates Washington, DC - Duration: 1:10.

-------------------------------------------

Senate Republicans mull changes to controversial criminal justice bill The Washington Post - Duration: 4:17.

Senate Republicans mull changes to controversial criminal justice bill The Washington Post

Senate Republicans are actively discussing changes to a controversial overhaul of the criminal justice system in a bid to win more GOP support that could nonetheless shatter a delicate bipartisan compromise on one of President Trumps top legislative priorities left for this year.

The changes being mulled, confirmed by senators and others familiar with the talks, reflect in part proposals put forward by the National Sheriffs Association, which is opposed to the legislation as written. Though a slew of law enforcement groups already support the bill, getting more of them on board is almost certain to improve its prospects among Republicans. 

One change that has been discussed privately is tightening the safety valve provision, which provides more discretion to judges when they issue sentences. Though the most recent public draft of the bill would allow judges to take advantage of those safety valves in more types of cases, Sen. David Perdue R Ga. said senators are talking about reducing the types of convictions that would qualify for the safety valve provision.

Perdue also said senators are considering narrowing the kinds of fentanyl related crimes that would be eligible under the legislation, which broadly is meant to loosen some mandatory minimum sentences and help rehabilitate prisoners. 

Im probably going to be supportive of it, said Perdue, who was a vocal opponent of a more expansive version of the legislation two years ago. It does some things that weve been talking about that Georgia and North Carolina and Texas have done, with good results.

A provision that gets rid of the stacking regulation — which is used to add more penalties against those who commit a drug related crime while possessing a gun, even if the firearm wasnt used — is also ripe for potential changes to win over Senate Republicans. 

The changes under negotiation reflect the messy, closed door horse trading that will only grow as Senate leaders begin gauging support for the bill this week, even if attempts to change the legislation are ultimately unsuccessful. Senate Democrats, who believe they have already made significant concessions, arent eager for more changes that would push the bill further to the right, considering it already has Trumps endorsement and appears it could easily pass the House. 

Im aware of the discussions, but we have a strong commitment on both sides of the aisle, including the White House, that the bill is what it is, Sen. Cory Booker N.J. , one of the main Democratic authors of the bill, said Monday evening of the changes being discussed. I believe we should all be standing pat and firm.

The bills supporters — both Republicans and Democrats — are also rushing against the clock, scrambling to get the measure signed into law this year before Democrats gain control of the House. The new majority, particularly the generation of lawmakers partly elected on a message of racial justice, could be more emboldened to push for more sweeping changes than the limited overhaul, upsetting the compromise. 

Another change that has been floated privately is including additional categories of sex offenders in the group of inmates who would be ineligible for early release, according to one Senate official.

The Justice Department evaluated the latest draft of the legislation for Sen. Tom Cotton R Ark. and said at least 10 types of crimes — such as assaulting a law enforcement officer with a deadly weapon, habitual domestic assault or strangling an intimate partner — were not explicitly listed among the crimes that would make a person ineligible to earn time credits. That, generally speaking, would make those people still eligible to get those credits under the departments view, according to emails between Cottons office and the Justice Department reviewed by The Washington Post. Politico first reported on the analysis requested by Cotton. 

Another Senate Republican official, however, said the bill has been carefully crafted to prevent violent and habitual offenders from getting out early via earned time credits and that a risk assessment process outlined in the bill should filter out dangerous criminals from qualifying.

So theres no need to add to the list of disqualifying offenses, the official said. 

While the discussions continue, the ranks of publicly opposed senators are growing. 

Sen. Marco Rubio R Fla. has been privately speaking with Sen. Mike Lee R Utah and Sen. Tim Scott R S.C. — two of his closest allies — but stressed Monday that while he is on board with the overhaul to the prison systems and recidivism programs, he is concerned about the proposed changes to sentencing laws.

Now that were getting to the guts of it, I need to have a better understanding, Rubio said. But as of now, I cant support it, given my understanding of it. 

Trump, meanwhile, has not wavered from his public commitment to the First Step Act and overhauling the criminal justice system — the subject of a Monday roundtable in Mississippi that was sandwiched between two campaign rallies. After endorsing the bill with much fanfare at a White House ceremony this month, Trump again pushed Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell R Ky. for a floor vote in a private phone call last Tuesday, according to people briefed on the conversation. 

Well, were talking to him, and were doing a count, Trump said Monday in Mississippi of his discussions with McConnell. We want to make sure that we have the votes because we dont want to bring it if we dont have the votes, but another thing were looking at right now is that we have more than enough. So at a certain point, well have a talk. But we have the votes, and Im sure that well be voting soon.

But McConnell, who has had numerous conversations with other Senate Republicans about the bill, is never eager to bring up internally divisive battles for his party. While the legislation is popular overall, it has also split his ranks between those aggressively pushing to ease some mandatory minimum sentences and others concerned about tarnishing the partys tough on crime reputation.

McConnell has also publicly and privately made the case that the criminal justice bill is competing with a litany of other legislative priorities in the remaining days of the session, including a must pass measure to fund portions of the government and a farm bill. 

Sean Sullivan contributed to this report.

For more infomation >> Senate Republicans mull changes to controversial criminal justice bill The Washington Post - Duration: 4:17.

-------------------------------------------

Bipartisan UXO-Demining Caucus launched in Washington, D.C. - Duration: 3:15.

On a very serious note I want to say thank you to everyone for joining us as we launch

this new Caucus and a special thanks to my co-chair David Valadao

who not only does the talk

he walks the walk and he has been a great hero of all of us in his efforts to work with

The HALO Trust in terms of getting money for Nagorno Karabakh most recently

and this effort is one that I feel so passionately about

as I'm sure Congressman Valadao does

and he'll be speaking shortly

but I just want to underscore for everybody that this is shameful

that we have allowed so much time to elapse

without having cleaned up the messes that we've left

around the world and I am kind of embarrased to say that in 2017 there were 2,700 people

who died due to unexploded ordnance or explosives and 7,239 were injured

and of those, about a third were children

So we need to do it now and so when you look at the fact that

there is more than 60 million people who live daily in fear of unexploded ordnance

we've got to do our job here and I know that you're all here because you recognise that

Sri Lanka is a great example where by 2020 they will be in a position to say: 100% cleared of all

of the unexploded ordnance

We want to be able to say that of everywhere that we've been

particularly in countries like Laos and Cambodia

When I first got elected to Congress this

is not an issue ever imagined being involved in

Most of us in the US could never relate

to the idea of the fear of walking somewhere and an explosive device either killing us

or destroying our futures

It's something just so foreign to us

I was down in L.A. one day

for a meeting on an unrelated topic and had the opportunity to be briefed by

The HALO Trust on the situation in Nagorno Karabakh and it just blew my mind and I thought we've

got to do something, we've got to look into this, we've got to see if we can get involved

in and continue this effort so working with different groups out there, on that specific

one it was the ANCA, and we were able to actually help direct some dollars

It was bipartisan

it was unanimous on the House floor when we offered that amendment so it was nice to see

that there was no other opposition to it and we kind of set a flag out there and started to

make some real waves

I'm really excited about the future of this Caucus and the future work

it will be able to accomplish and all of your involvement so thank you all for being here

For more infomation >> Bipartisan UXO-Demining Caucus launched in Washington, D.C. - Duration: 3:15.

-------------------------------------------

Your Capitol Dentist Team - Capitol Dental Associates Washington, DC - Duration: 1:26.

Here at Capitol Dental Associates whenever you do come into the door more than likely

you will see one doctor that's there but in reality you're actually getting three

doctors with different opinions the knowledge base is collaborative and it's not just

the one doctor's perspective on things. It's more 3-dimensional. I know with

Dr. Knox working with her and her patients you know you just see just sort

of the rapport She's amazing, love her, and she's funny very

down-to-earth I think that's one of the great things about her is to have that kind of

personality trait there's like that instant chemistry that you build with

your doctor I think that is just phenomenal. Dr. White very smart very

serious about his craft down-to-earth person he's more of a techie fun smart

innovative Dr. Saintil phenomenal with kids I've seen him interact with the children

and he's just just joking with them and giving him high-fives and that's just

just a complete clown with them. He's a child himself which is probably why it

helps the children love him he brings life into the office he brings the jokes

and like he gets the job done I love the doctors I work with I

absolutely love them it's it really helps the day just seemed so much fun

that is the most rewarding aspect here at Capitol Dental Associates we have this

collaborative effort that we have accomplished together

For more infomation >> Your Capitol Dentist Team - Capitol Dental Associates Washington, DC - Duration: 1:26.

-------------------------------------------

John Roberts counterpunches the counterpunching president The Washington Post - Duration: 2:58.

John Roberts counterpunches the counterpunching president The Washington Post

President Trump does not need, and should not pursue, a war of words with Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. Both lead equal branches of government. Neither would benefit from ongoing anvil tossing, especially at a time when Trump has no attorney general who can command the respect and attention of the legal community.

So please, Mr. President, strike a truce.á

Full disclosure: Roberts is an old colleague, with whom I shared a suite in the old Executive Office Building at the beginning of President Ronald Reagans second term. We ran together on the White House V Toes in the Nike Challenge of that eraáand played on the miserable White House basketball team.áAnd I am immensely grateful to him for some kindnesses along the way, especially for assuring that my workload was light in the counsels office, as White House Counsel Fred Fielding and his deputy Dick Hauser knew to whom to assign the tough stuff.

I became adeptáat defending the seal of the presidency from limousine services. The future chief justice was tasked with figuring out how to makeáSection 3 of the 25th Amendment work when Reagan underwent surgery for colon cancer and George H.W. Bush became acting president.

Division of labor is a very good thing, especially when a remarkable legal mind is at the call of the counsel to the president.

I am also one of the few very vocal defenders among originalists of the chief justices decision in theá2012 case against Obamacare that earned him an unwarranted suspicion among many in the tribe of my jurisprudential leanings. Quite simply, courts ought not to strike down federal laws passed by Congress and signed by the president if there is any way to avoid doing so. The chief justice found such a path and, along the way, revivified limits to the Constitutions spending clause while cementing the border around the reach of the interstate commerce clause. Nice work, that opinion. It is a modernáMarbury v. Madisonáand will be understood as such some decades down the line.

Theáchief justices concurrence ináCitizens United v. FECá is another jewel Ś an accessible and understandable yet comprehensive and precise statement of theástare decisisádoctrine and its limits. Read it if youd like a look ahead atáwhere the court is going and why.

I hopeáthe Roberts court plunges into a wholesale revamp of the jerry rigged fire trap of establishment clause jurisprudence andáthat it levels the God awful collection of incoherent holdingsáI must annually pretend to teach by memorization. Aálaw professor can no more teach establishment clause jurisprudence than a math professor can teach the square root of two .

I hope as well that the court makes free exercise rights more robust. And that it turbocharges the Fifth Amendments long dormant prohibition against taking property without just compensation, with the recognition that the public must pay property owners whenever an endangered species listing or a critical habitat designation devalues their land. The Supreme Court may also exile, finally, the use of race in the bestowing of benefits or infliction of penalties, and banish from its docket redistricting challenges Ś as redistricting belongs to the legislative and executive branches of the states, not the majority of nine unelected justices.

So we are at the dawn of a new era of an old idea: constitutional seriousness.áThe ground rules matter. And the Constitutions meaning, as understood at the time it was ratified or amended or interpreted before 2018, matters. The document, written mostly by farmers smart farmers, but men steeped in the hard rules of agriculture , debated mostly by farmers and ratified mostly by farmers, is a plain document. It ought to be read plainly.

When the chief justice speaks plainly to the president or to political parties, people notice. Good. Robertsáhas done to Trump this week what he did to President Barack Obama in the aftermath of the 2010 State of the Union address when 44 blasted the court for its ruling ináCitizens United. Roberts sallied forth then witháthis comment: The image of having the members of one branch of government standing up, literally surrounding the Supreme Court, cheering and hollering while the court Ś according to the requirements of protocol Ś has to sit there expressionless, I think is very troubling. Roberts was right then. He was right Wednesday.

Now the chief justice has counterpunched the counterpunching president. Good, again. Thats the job of the chief justice. He leads an independent branch of the Constitutions design, and independence is a dish best served hot. So it was.

Trump was wise not to provide a nickname for the chief justice. Hed be wiser still to leave off this particular debate. Get an attorney general the equal of the chief justice when it comes to intellect and constitutional chops and let them have at it. Hint, hint: Judge J. Michael Luttig. Bravo to the chief justice for calling a foul ball. We can hope the president doesnt swing on that pitch again.

Read more:

Marc A. Thiessen: Chief Justice Roberts is wrong. We do have Obama judges and Trump judges.

Ruth Marcus: Even the Supreme Court is alarmed about Trump

Jennifer Rubin: John Roberts, you are chief justice, not chief of PR

Hugh Hewitt: Trumps acting attorney general pick was an unnecessary self inflicted wound Ś but not a fatal one

Hugh Hewitt: The perfect person to replace Jeff Sessions

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.

For more infomation >> John Roberts counterpunches the counterpunching president The Washington Post - Duration: 2:58.

-------------------------------------------

Woman charged following shooting in Washington County, Virginia - Duration: 0:36.

For more infomation >> Woman charged following shooting in Washington County, Virginia - Duration: 0:36.

-------------------------------------------

NMSU hosts Washington State Saturday - Duration: 1:04.

For more infomation >> NMSU hosts Washington State Saturday - Duration: 1:04.

-------------------------------------------

After inauguration, Mexicos new government heads to Washington for migration talks The Washington - Duration: 7:08.

After inauguration, Mexicos new government heads to Washington for migration talks The Washington

The Trump administration is pushing to finalize an agreement with Mexicos new government in the coming days that would make asylum seekers wait outside the United States while their claims are processed, but officials from both countries caution that key provisions of the plan, known as Remain in Mexico, have yet to be settled.

Following Saturdays swearing in ceremony for president elect Andrés Manuel López Obrador, top members of his cabinet will travel to Washington, where they will discuss the matter Sunday and Monday with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen.

The two governments have tentatively agreed to the deals broad outlines , but it has yet to be formalized . Trump administration officials engaged in the talks say they are cautiously optimistic they can seal the agreement, while recognizing the López Obrador administration may need more time.

The new Mexican government is continuing to negotiate at the same time that theyre taking office and putting their administration together, so they have a lot going on, said one senior U.S. official involved in the talks, speaking on the condition of anonymity because negotiations remain sensitive.

[Deal with Mexico paves way for asylum overhaul at U.S. border]

Conditions in Tijuana, where most of the 8,000 Central Americans have arrived after traveling thousands of miles in caravan groups, have turned more desperate in recent days. Mexicos incoming administration and U.S. officials say that, following Sundays confrontation at the border, they are worried about the possibility of more unrest, particularly if militant members of the caravan seek to test the new governments willingness to use force to keep them away from the border fence.

Top aides to López Obrador this week publicly acknowledged that they are preparing to host thousands of Central Americans while they await a chance to seek refuge in the United States. And U.S. asylum officers are prepared to implement the Remain in Mexico plan as soon as the deal is finalized, according to internal memos obtained by The Washington Post.

Those aides to López Obrador have kept Trump administration officials off balance in the past week by alternately praising the agreement and denying they have one. They say they have 100,000 jobs available for Central Americans willing to work in factories along Mexicos northern border as well as on infrastructure projects in the countrys impoverished southern states, describing the plan as a building block to a broader partnership with the Trump administration.

Remain in Mexico is just that, incoming interior minister Olga Sanchez Cordero said last week in an interview. To be in Mexico because we give you work, because we want you to integrate into our population, because we speak the same language, because we want you to be here.

The medium and long term goal of the López Obrador government is to foment development in Central America by pouring in investment and generating jobs so people dont have to leave their homes , Sanchez Cordero said.

We want the United States to accompany us, she said.

Incoming Mexican foreign minister Marcelo Ebrard said this week his government wants a Marshall Plan for Central America, referring to the ambitious and costly U.S. effort to rebuild Europe after the devastation of World War II.

Asked by reporters how much the United States should commit to such a plan, Ebrard proffered dollar 20 billion as a reasonable target.

Mexico by itself is going to invest in our own territory during the next administration, more than dollar 20 billion, and so any serious effort regarding our brothers in El Salvador, Honduras, Guatemala should be for a similar amount, Ebrard said.

Trump administration officials have said privately they are prepared to commit significant resources to an agreement that keeps Central American asylum seekers on Mexican soil because such a deal would save millions of dollars in detention and enforcement costs.

But dollar 20 billion would dwarf what Washington currently spends on security and development aid for the region.

The incoming government is right to engage under the tenet of shared responsibility with the United States and to push for a holistic strategy, said Arturo Sarukhan, who was Mexicos ambassador in Washington from 2007 to 2013.

But it needs to be clear eyed as it enters these negotiations. Enunciating the goal of billions of dollars in aid, given the current political landscape in Washington, is not only Panglossian, it could artificially tee up an unattainable benchmark, which leads to failure, Sarukhan said, referencing the delusional optimist of Voltaires Candide.

Homeland Security officials have long sought a deal with Mexico that would obligate Central Americans who reach Mexican territory to seek asylum there. Asylum claims at the U.S. border have quadrupled since 2014, leaving the U.S. immigration court system at a breaking point, with a backlog exceeding 750,000 cases and court calendars booked years in advance.

[DHS asks Pentagon to extend troop deployment at the border]

Mexican authorities have ruled out one such arrangement, known as a Safe Third Country agreement, but Sanchez Cordero and other senior members of López Obradors team said they view Remain in Mexico as a more appealing alternative — as long as its a temporary one.

Eric Olson, a consultant to the Mexico Institute at the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, said he thinks the incoming government is looking for a deal that will mark a clear break with the punitive, law enforcement only approach.

President Trumps tweets that described the Remain in Mexico plan as something he was willing to impose — at the threat of closing the border — have also left the incoming government little room to maneuver.

They want to define their own policy, not only as a reaction to or negotiation with the U.S., but independently, on their own terms, Olson said.

Another Mexican adviser to the transition team said that were already in a risky place. When Trump talks about cooperation, he reduces it to Mexico having to arrest migrants, or else. When [López Obrador] talks about cooperation, he wants to stop emigration with development.

U.S. officials believe the Remain in Mexico plan is their best shot at getting migrants to stop leaving Central America in such large numbers, knowing they will not be able to easily cross the U.S. border and get released from custody while awaiting a faraway court date.

After Pompeo met with Ebrard in Houston on Nov. 15 to hammer out the deal, the tear gas clash at the San Diego border has given new urgency to questions about how to deal with migrant caravans and those waiting for asylum.

For now, Mexican authorities have dealt with some 6,000 members of the caravan by moving them from a flooded sports complex near the U.S. border to a former concert venue about 11 miles away.

[Mexico begins moving caravan migrants to new shelter]

López Obrador takes office Saturday in a Mexico City ceremony that will be attended by leaders from several Latin American countries, including Venezuela, Cuba, Peru, as well as Vice President Pence, Ivanka Trump, the presidents daughter and adviser, and Nielsen.

The Remain in Mexico plan, if implemented, would upend the way U.S. authorities process asylums requests at the border. Instead of allowing applicants to live and work in the United States while they await a hearing with an immigration judge, asylum seekers would have to stay in Mexico for months or years until their cases are decided.

At the U.S. border crossing in San Ysidro, U.S. border officials are currently accepting 60 to 100 asylum seekers per day, from a list with more than 5,000 names.

DHS officials say they will process at least twice as many under the Remain in Mexico plan, because they would not longer have to find detention space for those taken into custody.

Partlow reported from Mexico City.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét