Thứ Tư, 2 tháng 5, 2018

News on Youtube May 2 2018

BREAKING: OBAMA'S BILLION DOLLAR SECRET GOES PUBLIC – THIS IS BIG

JUST IN: Barack Hussein Obama's darkest secret has just leaked…

And it could lead to federal charges.

In the year since Obama left office, the American people have been learning the many lies he

told us all.

Freedom Daily reported that new reports have confirmed that the money Iran received in

sanction relief from the Obama Administration has in fact gone to groups considered terrorists.

Back in 2016, the Obama administration controversially and illegally transferred $400 million in

cash to Iran at Tehran's Mehrabad Airport on January 17, the same day the Americans

who were being held by the Iranian regime as hostages were released.

Though Obama's defenders claim this was not a ransom payment, it's clear that that's

exactly what it was.

Making matters even worse, this was not the only ransom that was paid, as Obama's White

House later paid $1.3 billion to Iran for what they claimed was interest from the $400

million held by the US from 1979 to 2016.

A new report from the American Action Forum (AAF) found that $37.4 million of the ransom

money likely has been handed over to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the group

that carries out terrorist operations around the world and that has murdered Americans.

"Applying the official (Iranian budget) spending levels to the U.S. payment to Iran,

the $1.7 billion would mean $37.4 million for the IRGC," wrote Rachel Hoff, the analyst

at the American Action Forum who calculated this.

"Paying ransoms in exchange for Americans held abroad is one bad policy.

Indirectly funding terrorism is another."

There's no doubt that the IRGC is a terrorist group, as the State Department report from

2012 cited the "marked resurgence of Iran's state sponsorship of terrorism through its

Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps — Quds Force, its Ministry of Intelligence and Security,

and Tehran's ally Hezbollah."

It went on to say that these terrorist activities "have reached a tempo unseen since the 1990s."

What do you think about this?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section.

h/t Any Politics

For more infomation >> BREAKING OBAMA'S BILLION DOLLAR SECRET GOES PUBLIC – THIS IS BIG - Duration: 14:31.

-------------------------------------------

Grays Point Public School on creating a healthier school canteen - Duration: 2:46.

[Music]

We have a wonderful school canteen at Grays Point Public School.

It's essentially the hub, if you like, of all the things we do.

Everything in our school is all about the children and what happens in our canteen really reflects that.

I've been in the canteen for about six years now

and I've seen the menu change quite a lot over those years.

When I first started a lot of the food was processed and frozen

and we made virtually nothing on-premises. Now everything is made from scratch.

Though the transition from the old menu to the new menu was quite easy,

because I've got a really good coordinator

I think it was an incremental approach. Started with a survey out to the parents

to see what they knew about the new strategy, what they were nervous about,

what they liked about our canteen currently, what they felt needed changing,

and then I think it was very easy to implement the changes of the strategy

because everyone felt like they had some ownership in it.

[Bell Rings]

[Music]

The feedback we've had from the parents has been very positive.

Especially the ones that know that their kids are getting healthy food made on-premises.

We try our best to do the healthy lunches every day, but it's nice to know

that you can get some healthy food from the canteen on those days when you order.

Knowing that, you know, you've got a healthy choice of a canteen,

it just helps out parents so much.

I get lunch there, um, about two times a week.

My favourite food's the garlic bread.

Chicken wrap with lettuce and cucumber. It's really good.

[Music]

A number of different things have been added. We have crunch and sip

so that if parents are rushing and don't have a chance to do the fruit break for them,

they can get fruit and water from us. We have vegetable sticks with hommus,

yoghurt with fruit on the top or yoghurt with muesli.

A lot of vegetables are incorporated into recipes that the kids don't even know.

And we have tried some things and they have not been successful.

And we've sort of, you know, sort of gone "oh okay, well it's not for them."

My advice for other canteens is to take it slowly,

don't jump in all at once and try and change everything at once.

Ask the children, ask the parents, put out a survey.

Moving forward now, this has just been the beginning of our journey.

I'll be really interested to see in the next couple of years just how much we've

changed the eating habits of children in our school.

For more infomation >> Grays Point Public School on creating a healthier school canteen - Duration: 2:46.

-------------------------------------------

Public Health ECHO: HPV Vaccination Challenges in Rural and Suburban Settings- 4/13/18 - Duration: 1:06:47.

So, a little bit about me.

My name is Deanna Kepka, I'm a health services researcher

and an assistant professor here at the University of Utah.

I've been here at the University of Utah for about six years.

I work at Huntsman Cancer Institute

and I'm on faculty in the College of Nursing.

I've been working in HPV vaccination

research and education for about ten years.

I started working in this field right around the time

when the vaccine was approved for girls,

that was in 2006.

And HPV vaccination is my prevention,

I have spent many many years and countless hours

working to integrate this vaccine into our primary care

system here in the United States.

And I'm hoping to share my passion with you today.

I'm also the director of the

Intermountain West HPV vaccination coalition

so most of my work has been done in the mountain west states.

So i'm excited to be here today

and I look forward to sharing with you some work

of my research team and of the Mountain West coalition, with you.

So can I move to the slides?

[inaudible]

I think we'll move to that after

we have Mandy's presentation.

[inaudible]

So, the title of my of my webinar today is a

HPV Vaccination Challenges in Rural and Suburban Settings,

I'm going to focus on one of

the most important determinants of

who is getting recommended the HPV vaccine.

And who is receiving the HPV vaccine

and their in the United States

and what factors are related to that recommendation

and getting that support for cancer prevention.

But before I move into my research and

my,

my areas of future research

and our discussion on factors related to this disparity.

I'd like to introduce to you one of my friends

and one of our partners in HPV cancer prevention

Mandy, so I'd like to share a little bit with

you about Mandy,

she's a writer, a speaker,

she's a public relations consultant

she's a cancer thriver,

and she is known on social media

for her hashtag cloud surfer and champagne lover.

One thing I love about her is her posts

of champagne glasses toasting

all around the world.

She's an accredited international travel,

lifestyle, health and wellness writer

and future's published articles in Thrive Global,

Bella Grace,

24-karat MC Living X magazine,

The Huffington Post, Yucatan Times,

Live and at Best overseas, travel west,

and so much more.

Her captivating storytelling adds magic to

her words and her passion for writing is contagious

as her passion for life and cloud surfing, flying.

She is an active blogger

and she's just an amazing HPV

advocate and she's here to share her story

on why this vaccine is so impor-

so important and can truly change the lives of so many people.

Thanks Mandy for joining us.

Thank You Deanna,

hi everyone obviously my name is Mandy

and I am joining you from from Nashville Tennessee today

I'm actually traveling so I'm doing this from a

from a hotel and I apologize if there's

background noise I'll mute myself

when I'm done so you won't hear any of that

but just want to apologize for that up front

because I do travel a lot as Deanna said

so as a travel and lifestyle writer I'm kind of

all over the world sometimes

but I am a huge advocate for HPV

and I'm just going to start with

with my story

and I want to start from August 2003

so this is before it's pre-HPV vaccine

and I'm sitting in a doctor's office at the

University of Utah and they tell me that

you know there's a chance that you have sexually

transmitted disease and I

kind of was in shocked in awe like how could

this be I'm not sexually active what's

what's what's wrong and reality of it is

is that's August 2003 by December 2003

I had to make a very big decision in life

and that was to have my uterus and cervix removed.

Now at the time I did not

know that it was HPV

wasn't an STD it was actually yeah

you know like a

typical what they were trying to tell me

it might be it was actually HPV that

caused me to have cervical cancer

no family history, obviously no vaccine, so

I'm sitting you know at the age of 22

coming out of surgery saying I'm never

going to be able to have children and

I have cancer.

It fast-forwards from there to

then i develop ovarian cancer,

two different times and because of my age

it was will take one the other one looks fine and

then the year after that,

the other one developed cancer

and so it was this

repetitive cycle which I didn't understand

and my health problems started at 16

I had endometriosis and so

I knew and I'd already been having

surgeries every six months

to combat my endometriosis but

I never knew what,

why I got cancer and now I do know and it, it is,

it was from the from HPV.

When I was a young girl

I was sexually abused and went through

a few series of years and traumas that actually

was where I contr-

contracted the HPV I just did not know

and as slow growing as it is

by the time I figured it out I had already had cancer

and so, I think that what's so important is that,

the vaccine is so important but in the

in rural areas and where people aren't discussing HPV,

we don't, we don't know

what we don't know and if we don't have the

conversation we're not helping anybody move forward

and if I could have had the vaccine

my life could have turned out very different.

Now obviously I was

before the vaccine and

how I met Deanna was the fact that my HPV test

became positive again so it's that

it's that worry that fear that

by the way you have abnormal pap results

by the way you have HPV

come back in six months that's

six months

for every single woman that has to go through

that you have abnormal results

I don't care if there's sixteen or fifty-two

that's six months of waiting is some of the most

frightening and scary moments of someone's life

waiting because it's not it's not a blood test

that can come back in 10 days

it's a

you have to wait six months and then maybe

we have to wait another six months

and you don't know the entire time if

you're going to have cancer and how

how much it will affect or not affect your life

and that's why I

appreciate all of the work that Deanna

that Deanna does with the HPV coalition and

the message that they have

because HPV is,

it can be, we can prevent cancer

we can literally change the lives of men and women and

it's, it's the most important conversation

that we should be having

because this is one cancer that

we can completely wipe out and

I don't know if we'll speak to this today Deanna but

the information that you shared in your TEDx talk with

with Australia I mean combating

the mindset that that

we have surrounding around HPV it is a

discussion it's a topic because

we shouldn't be afraid of a vaccine

that can wipe out a disease

and for one bad post on social media

there's probably millions of lives saved

and so when we breed positive

I believe that we can all

surround and come at HPV from a very positive place

and it takes people

like Deanna, takes people like me to share their stories

and their work to create change in

such a place with stigma and

especially I think in rural areas and

where people don't have access to

to the vaccine or to the conversation

you just have to start talking and we have to raise our hands

and say let's save lives

this is about saving lives it's not about

it's not this isn't a this isn't a

vaccine or the stigma around vaccination

or no vaccination it's really about saving lives.

So that's a little bit of my story, Deanna I don't know if you have,

if you have specific questions or if we want to open it up to questions?

um let's

am i unmuted, okay so,

could you tell me a little bit about

what your relationship was like with your family?

Yeah absolutely that, I think that's

that's probably a very important piece.

And I think in a rural, a lot of rural

communities there is a lot of challenges with

families and talking about this vaccine.

Yeah absolutely um

so I was I was raised and in the

Mormon religion and this,

this stigma of what happened to me

not even related to HPV was

was more of like let's sweep it under the rug

let's not talk about it

let's, let's just hide it from everyone else

and then never speak about it again

so not only does that

hinder conversation forward in any realm

but it also it's, it's emotional on so many levels.

When I figured out that it was HPV that caused

that caused the cancer

that's so emotional for me and and still

no one wants to talk about it and they've been very

trying to control this

conversation of

don't say anything let's not talk about it

we can't let people know we can't let

because what happened to me was

done by a family member

which you know, completely changed my life

completely changed my life

and I think that

when we're talking about small communities

and even larger communities

when we're trying not to have the conversation

we're trying to protect something

because of we're trying to protect a

secret it's

it's not helping

we have to be able to have the conversation because,

now I'm de- I'm dedicated to

to speaking out about it

because it's going to help so many other people

these unfortunately

circumstances like mine continue to happen

and we don't know where we will contract HPV.

As you know, it's you know, over 80% of us,

is that the number?

80 percent of us have it,

now does that always go to cancer? No.

and it's unfortunate we can't

say who's going to get cancer and who's not going to get cancer

but with my family they've still been in that place of like

please don't speak out, please don't,

please don't tell anybody they also

don't understand and if we can help one person

be able to step forward and receive the vaccine

so if there's an unfortunate circumstance

that they contract HPV and develop cancer

we can save their lives and so

it's hard it's not, it's not,

I don't think I have an answer on

how do we have the conversation of

being able to help someone talk

but having

different people speak about their situation

hopefully inspires

a smaller community or rural area to

to talk about it and

and step up and and I guess

do something about it.

Thank you so much for your strength

I think your message is

invaluable and so important in the work that we do.

Does anyone have any questions?

Please type your questions in

and Troy can read them out or if

please feel free to share some

supportive words.

Troy are you able to get those?

Well thank you so much Mandy

really appreciate you taking the time

especially on your long journey

from North Carolina

with this, with your,

I want to see car when you get here.

Alright yes I'm driving my, my

convertible from Asheville North Carolina to Salt Lake City so

that sounds really fun

especially just in time to get here for better weather, hopefully

we'll go for a ride when I get there

but Thank You Deanna for all the

work that you've done and thank you

everyone for your being on the

on the call and

it takes all of us right it

takes a village to make changes.

So, what I'm seeing is many people saying

thank you for sharing your message,

thank you for sharing your story,

you're an inspiration,

thanks so much for your strength

it shows great strength thanks for sharing your story.

Thank you for deepening this message

by sharing your story you're an inspiration,

thank you.

So many positive words.

Well thank you all

thank you so much.

Okay, do you want to share the results from what the

survey Troy?

Who do we have on the call today?

And there were some issues,

I guess we reached our cap of response

respondents.

But yeah, it looks like quiet a few in Nevada,

some in North Dakota, California.

Interesting mix of people. Super interesting.

California, Nevada, North Dakota.

So a lot of undergraduate students that's

good we're getting people before they're

out as professionals and this is when we

need to reach people

need to reach people before they become practicing

professionals either in social service agencies

or health departments or as

doctors or nurses

or as parents let's get you before your parents

or let's get you while you're eligible for the vaccine.

Graduate students, healthcare providers a few of you,

health department other,

great sounds like we have a nice mix of people

that's wonderful.

Do you see this question here?

What are some new and novel ideas

that folks are using to promote higher vaccination rates?

I work in a suburban pediatric clinic in Plano Texas that

mostly serves the medically indigent,

what, we would love to hear other scripts.

So, I think sharing um survivor stories

is is really important for healthcare

providers to motivate providers to

recommend the vaccine

but I think as we

get through our presentation today

we're gonna share a lot of the evidence-based

meth- methods like what is

the most effective strategies for improving

vaccination and really a lot of it rests

on that strong healthcare provider

recommendation and the provider

strong health care provider team supporting

this vaccine but we'll get into that

a little bit more as we move on in the

talk I look forward to discussing that further

does that sound okay?

Alright, so can you still see my slides?

Alright, how about now?

Okay the goals for today's talk is

we're going to present an over- overview of HPV

HPV cancers and vaccinations

and then we'll move into what we know about the social

cultural and instrumental barriers

surrounding HPV vaccinations that are

relative to rural and suburban settings

and what we mean by social and cultural

barriers they're barriers that affect attitudes not knowledge

interpersonal relationships, perception,

recommendation, willingness to accept the vaccine

and then when we talk about

instrumental barriers we're talking about access,

is the vaccine available at the clinic?

Can clinics afford to stock the vaccine?

Are parents able to get the vaccine, due to maybe transportation barriers

if they're in a rural setting.

Instrumental barriers are more tangible barriers.

So, we're talking about attitudes and relationships

and then actual tangible barriers.

So barriers that relate to costs or direct access

or feasibility

and then we're going to discuss evidence-based strategies

to improve HPV vaccination.

That could work in rural and suburban settings or what

we know works across the United States

and then we're going to talk about where

we really need future research.

Where do we need future research to really close

this disparity, to really start equaling out

the playing field where location no

longer is a determining factor on

whether or not you get the HPV vaccine.

I hope that sounds alright for everyone.

So, how many cancers are caused by vaccine

preventable HPV each year in the United States?

30,000.

How many people is this?

So, I'm in Utah,

this is as if each person

who filled up our football stadium had

an HPV related cancer

cancer that was vaccine preventable.

30,000 cancers.

An entire college football stadium

of cancers could be preventable if we just

increase uptake of this HPV vaccine.

That's amazing and it's more than just

cervical it's more than just female cancers.

What else could be prevented?

400,000 cases of genital warts.

400,000 cases. That's two times the population of

Salt Lake City.

Two times an entire city of people

could be prevented from having

genital warts.

True, genital warts are not going to kill you

but if you ask any teenager if they

could prevent themselves from having

genital warts for the rest of their lives

they will say yes.

If you could ask any mother if she could prevent the

transmission of HPV type 6 and 11

which are not cancer-causing they are not oncogenic,

oncogenic means cancer-causing,

HPV type 6 and 11 are not

oncogenic so she could prevent the transmission

of those two types from

herself to her child during delivery

which would then cause her child it

could lead to this

recurrent respiratory papillomatosis

in her child's throat

which would be recurrent warts in her child's throat

which would be need to be

removed by recurrent surgical procedures

she would say yes.

The HPV vaccine

prevents transmission of those HPV types.

It prevents the transmission of 7

oncogenic types and then 2 types

that cause 90% of genital warts.

Not only that

it prevents pre-cancers.

Now Mandy talked about

the anxiety of having that HPV

test every six months.

The HPV vaccine prevents that anxiety

it prevents 90% of

the infections that cause pre cancers and cancers

those oncogenic HPV types.

One in ten women will have an abnormal pap test.

This represents cervical

dysplasia that is caused by infection with HPV.

What does this mean?

This is 1.4

million new cases of low-grade

plus 330 thousand cases of high-grade cervical

dysplasia.

Why is this stressful? Why is this a negative occurrence?

Well I think

Mandy gave us some clues to this.

It causes anxiety, it causes stress about

one's sexual health,

it causes stress about one's fertility,

it causes stress about one's

interpersonal relationships, one's sexual

relationship with one's partner.

It can lead to surgical procedures medical

procedures that can impact your ability

to carry a child to term, it can result

in hysterectomy

for more advanced stages of cervical dysplasia.

It can lead to

a lot of lost wages the time you had to take off

of work to get these tests to

get the follow up procedures.

We can prevent this with HPV vaccination.

So now we need to talk about the HPV vaccine

not as a vaccine for girls but as a

vaccine for all 11 and 12 year olds.

And in the last few years this is more

important than ever.

HPV oral pharyngeal cancer if you look

at the bottom row is more common in men

than cervical cancer in women.

HPV cancers are no longer just female cancers

we have HPV oropharyngeal more

common in men than cervical in women

if you look at HPV 1618 I like to call them

our tzunami HPV types.

They are, cause the most amount of HPV related cancers

and then we have 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58

they're our hurricane types they are the

second most damaging HPV types

second was damaging oncogenic HPV types and

then our lighter blue tropical storm.

So, the vaccine protects against the tsunami

and hurricane types,

90% of the types that cause cervical cancer

and the vast

majority of the types that cause oralpharyngeal

along with these other

cancer types in the anogenital region.

This vaccine protects

against cancers in men and women.

30,000 cancers each year in the U.S.

So who has HPV?

We need to remove the stigma around HPV

and I think Mandy was talking about

how stigmatized she has felt and she is

not alone because you know what?

I have HPV, you have HPV, we have HPV,

Nearly all of us have had HPV

or will have HPV at some point in our lives.

It is so common that 80% of us

will have it at some point in our lifetime.

Most infections go away on their own

and most, and those that don't

go away on their own can

cause precancerous and cancers.

One in four of

us on this call today have active HPV infection.

The other trick of it is if we

don't know if we have it

and it has no signs or symptoms.

So any one of us can

pass it from one person to another

without knowing that we have it.

It's when it persists and a person doesn't

clear it within six months to two years

that's when it can lead to pre cancer and cancer.

The other trick of it is in

women we have PAP testing and HPV testing

so we're able to detect it in

women and treat it early

but in men in oral pharyngeal cancers

we do not have

an fda-approved HPV test

we are not able to detect it as a pre cancer.

We are not able to detect it effectively as an HPV

positive oral infection effectively we

do not have an FDA test for that.

That's why now more than ever it's

important to vaccinate boys

just as frequently as girls integrated into our

primary, primary care system.

We should be recommending HPV

same day same way as

all other vaccines and at every visit

when a child comes into the healthcare

system and this vaccine is so effective

we have dropped it down from three doses

to two for under age 15.

The data showed this vaccine works

and giving it at it

at a younger age works.

The immune system is stronger at a younger age

and as a result

kids can get just two doses under age 15

within a 12 month time frame spaced six

months apart.

And like Mandy mentioned

Australia has a phenomenal vaccination

rate eighty percent of girls

seventy-three percent of boys

successfully integrated it into their school

immunization program for kids up

to age fifteen is on the path to become

the first country to completely

eliminate cervical cancer.

Let me say that again,

the first country to

completely eliminate a cancer

due to successful integration of HPV into their

immunization program for kids.

Where are we with this?

We are not quite on that path yet,

we can turn these numbers around

but right now, we are not quite on that path.

We have less than half of our kids

43 percent these are the most recent

NIS-Teen data 2016

showing that our kids are up to date with the vaccine

by ages

17, so this is even older than Australia data.

Australia's data was up through

15 we're at 17 we have 43 percent

about half of our girls 38 percent of our boys

so we see a disparity between girls and boys

so we've got a ways to go to get to

the same numbers as Australia.

And this blows my mind because this is a safe and

effective cancer prevention vaccine.

It prevents 9 HPV types and I think I laid

out why preventing these HPV types are so important

it is not a new vaccine it's

been around for more than 10 years

and it has been proven to be just as safe as

any other immunizations that we give to

our 11 and 12 year olds and yet we see

this huge disparity not only have it do

we have low vaccination rates in our

country compared to other nations like Australia

but we see big differences

across the U.S. by where you live.

If you live in California or in Maine

you're more likely to have been recommended

and to receive the vaccine

or Massachusetts than if you live in Utah or Texas

and you can look at this

map and you see the different shades of blue.

So, the darkest blue regions have

vaccination rates of 70% or higher for

first dose of the vaccine where the

lightest regions have less than half of

the kids.

So this, this is a disparity

this is where we see big disparities by

where you live

likelihood of having received a vaccine

then so those in certain locations are

have a much higher likelihood of having

received a vaccine than those in other locations,

it's a geographic related disparity.

And then when we look at other disparities

around HPV related cancers

we see a little bit of a flip so

in the south we

see lower rates of HPV vaccination rates

we don't see a lot of dark blue in the

southern region of the U.S.

We do you know a lot of those southern states are rural

like South Carolina and New Orleans

they have very light blue HPV vaccination

coverage but then when we look at

issue related cancers in the south we see a

lot of this darker orange to red

which means that they have higher incidence of

HPV realated cancers in the south.

So, they're not receiving the protection

because their vaccination rates are lower

and their HPV cancer incidence is higher,

it doesn't mean the whole country

shouldn't be trying to strive to rom- to

meet that HPV healthy people 2020 goal

of 80% vaccination coverage two or three

dose completion

but I'm still showing an additional disparity that we're gonna

see over time by these regions of the country

with higher HPV cancer incidents

and lower HPV vaccination.

So, health officials are seeing this disparity and

there's been news around this, we're seeing

this rural-urban gap widening

and unlike in the past where

we've seen urban regions

lower-income urban regions having

larger challenges with access to preventive

services we're seeing the flip with the HPV vaccine.

And that's why health

officials are puzzled

I'm going to walk you through this.

So these are those

NIS teen data again

they're the most recently available data.

So if you, let's

look at the first column first dose

this means kids that by the age of 17 who've

received the first dose of the H I-

the HPV vaccine

so the average for first

dose receipt of the vaccine is 65 percent

that means 65 percent of the

kids by age 17 in the u.s. among

boys and girls have received one dose if we

look at urban kids

it's almost 71% have received one dose

but then we look at suburban

it drops down by eight percentage points,

63 percent and then rural 56 percent

oh wait so and then that's for females and

then we look at males it's 56 for the, um,

the u.s. average and then for girl for

males for first dose for urban is 61

for suburban is 54 and rural is 44 so we're

seeing this huge disparity each and

every single measure you're seeing a

reduction.

So let's do this one more time

females urban 70% suburban 63% world 56

percent males urban 61% for first dose

suburban 54 rural 45%.

Now let's look at third dose

for females we're seeing urban 48%

suburban 42% so it's the same pattern,

rural 34%, so there's a huge gap between

urban and rural from 48 percent to 34 percent

but that suburban is right in

the middle - there's a gap for suburban

and then we look at males again it's the

same pattern,

35 percent for urban

for three doses, 30% so this is

when three doses were recommended 30%

for suburban and then only 23% for rural.

Wow, that is such a huge disparity

and it's a trend that is happening across

the whole country.

So, I'm going to talk about

some rural barriers to that

vaccination.

So these are some general barriers

that we know to HPV vaccinations

that are happening across the whole United States.

Major barrier, a lot of

people are just not associating even though

those vaccines been around for ten years

HPV is related to 30,000 cancers each

year in the US people are just not

making that association, they're not

making the association or

the relationship between HPV and male and

female cancers.

Across the whole u.s.

people are waiting to vaccinate until

older pages they're thinking it's not

an appropriate vaccine for a younger ages

they're thinking oh it's STI

we can wait till my kids older, we're not thinking

it's for 11 and 12 year olds.

There's been a trend, there's been an over -ly

feminin- feminized attitude about

this vaccine for, that it's for girls and

not boys because mainly in part because

it was recommended in 2006 for girls in

2011 for boys,

maybe in part because it was really promoted

as a cervical cancer

vaccine, within there's this delay

of uptake for boys.

A lot of times adolescents at these ages

11, 12, 13, 14,

they're healthier so they're not going

the primary care providers as often,

don't have as much opportunity to get the vaccine.

It hasn't been framed as a cancer prevention vaccine.

All the stig-

stigma around sexually transmitted infections

and talking about it at this

age where kids are going through puberty

has just caused so many problems that

this vaccine has not been successfully

integrated into your primary care for

this age.

Now, let's look at rural challenges.

Strong provider recommendation,

we know this is the number one reason

and why a kid gets this vaccine

and we know in rural regions it's even less

likely that a provider is going to make this

strong recommendation. There's just

data that shows when providers are

even more hesitant to make this

recommendation in rural regions.

We know that there's health care system

challenges for why the HPV vaccine is

not being strongly recommended or

systems aren't being developed to

integrate reminder systems is even more

challenging in rural environments because

healthcare systems have fewer

financial resources, they may have fewer

providers, they may have electronic

health record systems that are not as

fancy or sophisticated, so in a rural

region it's even more difficult

those same challenges that are present across

the whole US are even more problematic

and have a greater impact and less

likelihood of kids getting the HPV vaccine.

What else is going on? There's

multiple doses for this vaccine,

so this can be a problem for kids all over the

place because kids are busy

11 and 12, 13, 14 year-old kids are busy parents are

busy but now if you factor the

multiple doses in a rural environment some

parents are driving hour and a half

two hours to get their kids to the doctor.

If they have to go back for two and three doses,

that's gonna be an extra hindrance

it's going to be another barrier

that's going to prevent vaccine completion.

Costs.

This vaccine needs to be stored in a

refrigeration, it needs to be refrigerated.

This couldn't be expensive

for a rural practice if it's a small

practice and if there's a low demand for this vaccine,

if patients are not

accepting this vaccine

if it's not being integrated

into vaccine delivery it can

be expensive to stock this vaccine

if the vaccine is expiring and it's not

being used.

So there's higher costs for cold storage

if the vaccine is not being used for rural practices

and when you have new

patient populations so in some rural clinics

they may only have 50 age

eligible kids in a whole year

for the vaccine so this could be really

difficult or they may only have a hundred

kids compared to an urban

practice that has thousands of kids.

These are huge challenges.

And then the

availability of a vaccine I've talked to

a number of small practices in

Wyoming and Montana where

really small practices like maybe only one primary

care provider or two primary care providers

at the practice and they

cannot afford to stock the HPV vaccine

they can't afford to stock any

adolescent immunizations.

So what they do

is they recommend the child to go to the

health department to receive their immunizations

and well this is an extra

step so this means the parent needs to

go to the primary care provider for the

well child visit

and then needs to go to

the health department to get their immunizations.

So it's an extra step as

the parent is more likely not to do it

one more step is another trip that they

have to make and then the next challenge

is tracking,

it's making sure that the data

are reported back to the primary

care provider.

So, this is where I see

the additional challenges that rural

practices have on top of the standard

challenges, the standard barriers, to HPV

vaccinations.

And I'm getting this information

from conversations with

world doctors from

literature reviews that I've done and from

some of my own

research.

So, I'd like to stop and just for a few

moments and see if anyone has

any questions or any comments.

I'm just going to take a little drink of my

coffee about some of these points

before I move on to my next topics,

okay,

trying to see them, okay yeah.

"This is great information we have to do more to

change the conversation"

and Christy Brown shared, "providers need to recommend

recommend this this is very important there needs to be a

concerted effort made in rural

communities regarding getting HPV

vaccinations to the kids"

Yeah that's thank you definitely

definitely especially, yeah we need this

protection and a lot of times we see

disparities and cervical cancer in

rural communities because of access to PAP

testing that's why we need the protection

even more.

Okay, anything else?

Okay, I'm gonna move on.

So now I'm gonna talk a little bit about my research in

Utah, so the thing about Utah is

we have some large much of metropolitan regions

so we call the Wasatch Front,

the Salt Lake City Provo area and then we also

have st. George which is border of Nevada

an hour from Las Vegas so

those in Nevada are familiar probably with Saint George

but then we have many

rural towns and we have regions

which are considered frontier and so that

means very even smaller than rurals so,

few people, just a few people per square mile,

so that allows us to measure differences

between urban and rural and so what my

team is able to do is we looked at

missed opportunities for HPV vaccination

using registry data. So we got ahold of

our immunization information system so

most states have vaccine registry data

but the challenge with it is for

researchers to work with health department's

to get access to these data

it's really difficult

but we were really successful we have a

phenomenal health

department and we've built a really great partnership,

so we got access to

data on 55,000 girls over a

five-year time period and these data

allowed us to see real-time visits

when girls went in and got immunizations from

80% of the visits that happened in Utah

over this time period so we're able to

see what happened when kids came in for immunization

visits did they get the HPV

vaccine or not when they got another adolescent visit,

and this paper was published a few years ago

and papillomavirus research you see

the citation below if you want to look it up

and learn more about it. So what we

saw is so this data is more

sophisticated than the NIS chain data

which I was just reporting to you

because that data is survey based and

then they pull medical records

but they're just looking at overall

vaccination rates while we're looking at

individual visits to a provider office

and what happens in those individual

visits so these are more exact data

because we're looking at every single

interaction when a vaccine is delivered

and we saw it when we looked at all of

those 55,000 interactions for those

women and those girls 44% of the time

a girl got another vaccine and not the HPV

vaccine over a five-year time frame.

So that means there's 44% of the time we

could have improved access to cancer prevention

and then there was another

40% of the visits we saw a missed opportunity

where there was an

opportunity to get dose two and three

and the patient didn't get that vaccine.

So, there's a lot of missed opportunities

happening in Utah over that five year

time frame.

And then we dug a little deeper and

tried to tease apart what was

going on a little bit closer

and we saw that two out of three preteens that

means 11 and 12 year olds had a missed opportunity

so our younger kids are definitely most

likely to go in and get one of those

other immunizations which is Tdap

meningococcal or menara or flu and that

HPV and this is the age when you really

should be getting the vaccine you'll get

the most protection at this younger age

and so two out of three of our younger

teens are getting a missed opportunity

compared to one out of three of our

older teens.

And then we found in Utah

whites are more likely to have on this

opportunity compared to Hispanics and

that's where we're seeing so many

differences with this vaccine compared to

other health issues we're seeing this

disparity it's just flips

like a reverse disparity where

urban kids are more likely to get the vaccine

in Utah Latinos are more likely

to get the vaccine.

And then now for the hot topic of today,

we see urban kids are

less likely to get the vaccine so

rural kids had a higher level of missed

opportunity which means they are more likely

to see their doctor and get Tdap

meningococcal or flu

42% of the time they went in to see their

doctor and got

one of those other vaccines and not HPV

over five years.

Some limitations in this

study is we weren't able to look at visits

when they went in and didn't get

a vaccine I would have liked to looked at

look at like when they got a physical

or when they went in for

another visit like strep throat or ear infection

this really the vaccine you should be offered

at every single visit

and sometimes there's mistakes in data entry

in these type of data so we had to do a

lot of cleaning

but the strengths are- these are data

for the whole state they're very complete

but huge participation and are

very long time interval.

So here's where I think we need more research we

need to look at more provider and healthcare system

level factors

especially in suburban barriers this is

where it's really tricky because it's

like middle ground it's easier to tease out

the urban and rural because they're

they have

it's clear with looking at different

zip codes, looking at more

distinctive factors based on population

and the way health care systems are set

up what's going on in these suburban settings?

What's going on with vaccine hesitancy?

What is going on with attitudes? Is it

really a stronger rates of just

concern around vaccination overall that's

impacting it or is it problems with HPV vaccinations

specifically? Is it at the

provider level or the parent level?

Is it factors around bundling practices

or is it um perceptions by the doctors that

these kids aren't risk for HPV

related cancers so

we don't need to recommend

this vaccine in suburban practices.

So, I think there's so many issues that

needs to be teased apart in that

lower level of HPV vaccination that's

taking place in suburban settings across

the u.s.

So I'm going to move into talking a little

bit about some

evidence-based strategies that we know improve

HPV vaccination.

So we need to be

educated and this is some of the work

that our coalition's been doing we need

to learn about making this a public

health priority we need to become

Australia, we need to be right up there with

one of the countries that's on the

path eliminating this cancer.

We need to make sure that our providers are on

board with this, this is not an optional vaccine

this is- you don't have an option

just to talk against this vaccine

this is part of our public health platform in

the United States supported by the CDC

the ACS, the National Cancer Institute, we

need to share the benefits with parents

and patients it needs to be bundled when

your child comes in for a visit your

physician or primary care provider and

nurse should be saying your child

needs three vaccines today: Tdap, HPV, and

meningococcal.

Today your child should have three vaccines that

are designed to

protect him and her from meningitis

cancers caused by, caused by HPV, tetanus,

diphtheria and pertussis.

BAM, that is it.

Should be routine procedures to reduce

miss opportunities.

Here are some evidence-based interventions that work:

standing orders, what is standing orders mean?

they mean all medical staff who are

eligible to deliver vaccines should

be able to deliver vaccines to age eligible

parents, you don't need to wait for the doctor

to approve it, they should just be

able to do it once a child is in there

and is willing to do it you have the

parents approval BAM you do it.

Provider prompts: providers should be reminded

that a child is eligible to do it

through EHR systems electronic health

record systems and they should be giving that

strong and bundled recommendation

that I just demonstrated for you.

Providers need to assume parents are

getting it don't ask a parent, just tell

them tell them they're getting it be

confident don't present it as optional.

Use prevent parent patient reminder and

recall systems: this could be really important

in rural settings especially

if you have to commute pretty far way to

get to your provider those postcard

reminders, text, emails, phone calls,

could be really helpful for reminding parents

to get into their provider office

or maybe to make that appointment when

they're making another trip into

town for another reason and to really

encourage plan-do-study-act cycles, so

what these cycles are are quality

improvement processes where,

if you want health care teams improve they need

to know how they're doing so they need

to be interfacing with data but not on a

big scale it's not going to help them

to know what their vaccination rate is for

an entire year it's going to help them to know

what it is for today and

tomorrow and this week so they could set

tiny goals to try and improve and they

can make small changes and see how that impact

impacts their vaccination rate

it's almost like each day is a tiny

experiment if they change their language

a little bit if they do things a little

bit different that they work together as

a team and in slightly different way

slightly different way, how does

that impact their rates and that helps

motivate them looking at data looking at

ways where numbers go up or down

could help them make slight adjustments to

then improve or adjust from a decline

to make a change and try again,

all of these processes work.

We are working with

American Academy of Pediatrics here in

Utah right now we're doing a quality improvement

project with small practices

in Utah Wyoming and Alaska.

We use HPV cancer survivors stories

Mandy is one of our advocates to

share stories with pediatricians who working

in small practices all over this region

with low HPV vaccination rates to help

motivate them to make that smart strong recommendation.

So pediatricians and

their health care teams often never seen

a HPV cancer. HPV cancers affect people

in their 20s 30s 40s 50s sometimes 60s

so we want them

to make this cancer real we want them to

feel how painful it can be on someone's

life if they feel that they will be

inspired and motivated to know that

they're doing good when that child gets that

vaccine.

We also include webinar

based provider coaching strategies on

those plan-do-study-act cycles and we

use webinar based strategies on a monthly

basis so people can participate

from anywhere in the world they can

participate from rural Alaska, rural

Montana, rural North Dakota.

So, and it helps have interaction and get feedback

on their vaccination strategies that are working

help them look at their data, map

their data out,

and in the past we did

the same study the same quality

improvement project with Montana, Nevada,

Utah, and Wyoming and we had

improvements in vaccination rates,

not huge but small ones but every every

vaccinated child makes a difference

that's one child is going to not be

facing HPV related disease.

Some future areas of research that I think are

needed is we need to look at the effectiveness

of targeted provider and

healthcare teen training activities

for rural and suburban settings, what do we

need to do differently in these settings.

What are the characteristics of these

rural and suburban regions that are

really relating to lower rates of

vaccination and how does that relate to

where we should be targeting our

interventions and how we should be designing

our interventions.

Aside from

that strong provider recommendation,

do we need other messages for parents in

the rural and suburban settings?

Do we need to look at this,

come at it from a

slightly different angle to be more

impactful and to address parent concerns

How can we get rural and suburban

practices to own and prioritize HPV

vaccination?

I think our HPV advocate

program is one way of doing that

I think stories like Mandy's really help.

How can we make this more normative, how

can we get them to buy into how

important it is to prevent experiences

like Mandy's had.

How can we improve access to

HPV vaccine in rural clinics?

How can we subsidize the cost

for storing the vaccine in rural clinics?

You know, is it fair that a rural clinic

needs to pay the same as a wealthier

more urban clinic just to store and

stock that vaccine?

I don't know because

that's limiting the access of that

vaccine to rural kids and how we best

monitor and celebrate improvements for

HPV vaccination rates and small

practices?

So, rural practices may not have these

fancy electronic health record

systems, they may not even have EHR systems,

so what are some ways that we

can give them feedback on their data

and help them celebrate their achievements?

So, what questions do you have about

location and HPV vaccination? let's see

we have a couple of minutes.

Feel free

J Anderson says,

"I'm in Elko Nevada and were hosting a teen health fair

May 22nd, we were having a

vaccination clinic at the health groups to include

HPV, I can't thank you enough

for this presentation it will help us as we move forward

with promoting the event."

Great, thank you!

Question here, is it reasonable for men older than 26 to get the vaccine?

so that's so for that it should be between

a discussion between yourself

and your provider that is completely up to

you and your provider the only issue

with that it could be reasonable definitely

is, it- it is not likely that

insurance will cover it unless you're of

a very high-risk population.

Are family practitioners slash general practitioners

included in the outreach and improvement efforts?

Rural areas may not have pediatricians.

definitely

so um yes

in for AAP they focus on

pediatricians but for my work

I focus on primary care providers so I'm working on

a couple big intervention grants

and if they get funded all of my partners are

family practitioners and general practitioners.

I've been reading a lot of articles and blogs on the

internet stating the HPV vaccine

will cause horrible side effects

although I'm not sure how true these

statements are, do you have any studies or

evidence comparing the data between

vaccinated people who have had issues

directly correlated to the vaccinations

versus issues caused by HPV

and unvaccinated people that could be

prevented if they received the full vaccination?

So the CDC has done a phenomenal

job of reporting VAERS which

is the vaccine adverse side effects

V-A-E-R-S and there is no reason to believe

that HPV causes has any more

associated adverse side effects and any other

vaccine that is given at this age

so the associations we don't see but it doesn't

mean it's impossible but there are no at this

point, there are no known serious

side effect associations noted

other than pain at injection sites and the

risk of fainting following vaccination

so because of the risk of fainting it's

recommended that kids and young adults

sit down or lay down after they're

vaccinated but the CDC has done an

excellent job tracking vaccination risk

and they track association with serious

side effects and at this point there is

a higher risk with known serious side effects.

Is there any benefits of getting the vaccine

after you already been diagnosed?

I think that's another conversation

between yourself and your provider

I think if you're within the age

recommendations for the vaccine

which is up through 26 it protects against 9

types so the idea around the age 26

is unlikely that you've been exposed to all

9 types so you may still benefit from protection

in the vaccine against one of

those types or most of those types

there's still benefit up through age 26

based on epidemiological estimates.

Any tips for dealing with anti-vaxxers?

I think it's anti-vaxxers I

I'm still learning I don't know other than I think

if people have a difficult story

of someone who they believe has been harmed

by a vaccine I think just show

compassion because when a child has ever

been harmed we need to show compassion

for any child's pain or illness or

disease and I think what I like to do

is just cite the data that we do know this

the resources that CDC knows

and I say associations but when we look at causes

we, we don't, we can never say that

something does not cause something we

could just say the data show that it's unlikely

that's what I try and do that's

the best I can do.

Kind of like hypothesis testing right

I just want to make sure we address these few last questions,

if you have to sign off feel free,

thank you so much for joining us today.

please share my slides with everyone

because I have a link to my TED talk I

have a link to our coalition if anyone wants

to join our coalition which we

have monthly webinars we're also hosting a

meeting in June here at Huntsman

Cancer Institute and anyone's welcome to come

it's a national HPV vaccination

meeting that's gonna be co-hosted with

NCI and the CDC and all the cancer

centers who are working in HPV vaccinations

please share my slides!

Can you provide

some talking points parents say my child

is with me all the time they aren't

having sex or I've heard the vaccine

can affect fertility?

So, I think

for the not having sex I say this is a

prevention vaccine and it's given at 11

and 12 because your immune system is

best able to respond and give protection

against the HPV types and the vaccine is

supposed to be given before sexual

activity has begun so I

I stress that it's not supposed to be

given when sex begins it's not supposed to be given

after sex has been initiated

it's supposed to be given early on

many years before sexual initiation and

that's when the body best responds

to HPV types in the vaccine and

that's why evidence has shown us that

it's so effective that we only need two

doses under age 15

and then the fertility I would say data have not

shown that it is not associated with

lower rates of fertility in fact

abnormal pap tests are related to

problems with fertility we the data show

the opposite that abnormal pap tests

are related to risks of infertility and an

extreme extreme are higher rates of

cervical dysplasia in extreme cases can

be even related to hysterectomy

so in fact the opposite is true that's what I

would say.

Have you heard of any programs where HPV vaccination

is administered by a nurse in a school based programs?

Seems like that would reduce barriers

vaccine expiration and travel.

Yeah I know a program in Utah in small

in our small towns here they kind of

receive a blanket permission from parents

to administer it but I do know

it's a little slippery slope and they do need

to receive permission from their

parents to do it so what they do is they say,

we're gonna give your kids XYZ

vaccines and they just have HPV as one of them

and they've been successful in

doing it but when I interviewed this

nurse and I really wanted to like do a

press story on and I want to just you know

commend her as a hero she didn't

want to do it when I wanted to show her off

in the media so I think it's a

slippery slope it was a local hero but

she wanted to stay quiet about yeah I

think it's possible but you kind of have to not you know in our in my culture

here it's a quiet unsung heroes so it'll do it.

So what's the current thinking about the possibility that

vaccinating against high incidence HPV types will in

the long run result in other types

becoming dominant as the cause of cancer?

There's no reason to believe in that

if you look at data in Australia if you

look at the fact that

the top epidemiologists in the world who study

HPV types this is their job

do not support that as a feasible hypothesis.

When we're looking at the incidence

of cervical dysplasia related to

vaccination and a declining there's no reason

to believe that but who knows

what could happen in 50 years I think

it's unlikely good question.

Texas was one of the states that had the lowest

vaccination rate but it still was low for HPV, why is that?

Good question.

It was low for HPV related cancers, I think if you look

it well for one thing you can't see the

relationship there because the vaccine

was just improved in 2006 for girls

and it takes you know 20 to 30 years to

develop cervical cancer.

so we're not gonna see a relationship to cervical

cancer yet.

So when I presented those two slides

my argument was we know we're

looking at 50 years from now

my what I said good question and I don't know why

Texas is low for HPV related cancers

I would think certain subpopulations do

have higher HPV related cancers but

we don't-- we're not seeing a

relationship right now between incidence

of HPV related cancers in states and

their vaccination rates we won't see that

for another 20 years what we're

seeing now is just relationship between

issued vaccination and declines in HPV

infection at the population level

so we're able to see that now.

How do they join the coalition?

Oh yeah so you could email me,

Deanna.Kepka@utah.edu

and I'm in the slides at the end

and just email me and you can join

our coalition you'll be on our list

and you'll get all our monthly updates

in our newsletter and you can join our monthly

meetings they're all webinar

based and we have amazing speakers from all

over the country and we have we

tried in by next month we're going to have

an oral-pharyngal cancer survivor

from Florida, a male, a guy,

so you try and get speakers who have different

experiences to share their stories to.

on your slide you wrote vaccine should be completed by

age 13, is there a reason for that?

I know you can start at age 11 but is there a

reason that its best to be completed by age 13?

So, the recommended ages I mean that's the

ideal recommendation guidelines that are

those are the CDC recommended practices

it doesn't mean-- better late than never,

so better late than never like if you

get one dose at age 11

you can complete the series and get your second dose at

age 18 you won't even need a third dose,

better late than never but the

younger the better.

The guidelines are two doses

under age 15 within twelve

months starting at 11 and 12 are ideal

because it's really supposed to be

integrated with the Tdap and menactra

vaccines. Some practices are starting in

early as 9 and 10 because they think parents

are more willing to accept it

that age, so they give one dose at nine

or ten and then they give the second

dose at 11 when the kid comes back

for Tdap or mena-- menactra and bam they're done.

So there's a lot of different ways to do it

but the younger the better so

that's why it's best by thirteen.

Alright, I think that was the last question.

thank you so much, Deanna.

Thank You Mandy for sharing her story this was just fantastic, thank you.

Thank you have a happy weekend!

For more infomation >> Public Health ECHO: HPV Vaccination Challenges in Rural and Suburban Settings- 4/13/18 - Duration: 1:06:47.

-------------------------------------------

Swans return to Public Garden - Duration: 1:29.

For more infomation >> Swans return to Public Garden - Duration: 1:29.

-------------------------------------------

【LikeCoin public token sale starts on May 7th】What problem does LikeCoin want to solve? - Duration: 3:12.

My most popular post

got 15,000 Likes

and 2,500 Shares

But the thing is I got no immediate reward

Imagine that we are building a tower on a beach

and Facebook is that beach we are grounded

The content showing up on the Internet is free normally

When you publish any articles or works onto Facebook,

you'll find that you are basically working for free

It's a move to redistribute the interests

to re-align creativity and reward

On Instagram, Facebook or Youtube, for instance

When someone has done an illustration

or has filmed a vlog

As he is an individual artist

we get used to give a Like or Share only

but not paying

There is a serious problem about the creation on the internet

For the community of indivual artists, which is

"Good content without good reward"

Feeling like we are building towers on a beach

and we are not sure when our efforts will be gone

seems like we can never be settled

We all have contributed our efforts

but we can never get a reasonable return

To me, those social media platforms like Facebook

seems to help all artists

to distribute their content

to host their content

but in fact the platforms have got the most part of the reward from advertising

as the creators help to draw the traffics

Some of my articles

get a lot of reads

may have got thousands shares

I have worked hard for that

contributes my creativity

but I can't get any reward in fact

That's why good content

can hardly survives

The relation of creativity and reward, for the creative works on the Internet, has been totally

decoupled. That's the problem we are going to solve.

Our tagline is "Reinventing the Like"

It's a protocol

Creators can become part of the ecosystem based on this protocol

so that every stakeholders get

their reasonable reward with a consensus

I found that a lot of content creators in Hong Kong

hesitate to release their creative works,

under Creative Commons license.

LikeCoin actually provides a business model

for Creative Commons and the creators.

LikeCoin was born

for those freelancers and individual artists

to let them play freely with their creativity

Share their works and get their reward

If LikeCoin becomes more and more popular in the community, or

more and more peoples believes in the values and principles that LikeCoin is representing

a virtuous circle can be built

Reinventing the Like

For more infomation >> 【LikeCoin public token sale starts on May 7th】What problem does LikeCoin want to solve? - Duration: 3:12.

-------------------------------------------

Traffic deaths spike in Spartanburg Co. has coroner asking public for help - Duration: 2:27.

For more infomation >> Traffic deaths spike in Spartanburg Co. has coroner asking public for help - Duration: 2:27.

-------------------------------------------

Public Speaking How To: 6 Steps to Ace Any Networking Event and Gain Connections and Clients - Duration: 8:51.

(gentle music)

- Hello, this is Victoria Lioznyansky,

and I help entrepreneurs overcome

their fear of public speaking

and transform into confident, compelling,

and captivating speakers.

And today, we are going to talk about networking.

Here are my six steps to ace any networking event,

and to gain connections and clients.

Step number one: be yourself.

This is so important.

When you come to a networking event

pretending to be someone you're not,

everyone can see the mile away.

You go there to build actual, authentic human connection,

and the only way you're gonna do that

is if you are your authentic self.

So don't pretend to be more important than you are.

Don't pretend to have a bigger business than you have.

Don't pretend to be somebody you're not.

But don't underestimate your achievements either,

particularly when you talk to somebody who is

an influencer in your field.

Don't try to look at them as a groupie looks at an idol.

Be an equal.

You want to be your authentic self,

but you're still equal to everybody out there.

They're still real people.

You know they may be influencers that may be really, really,

really important people in your field,

but they're still people.

They're still just like you.

Keep on reminding yourself that.

They are just real people exactly like you and me.

So when you are out there talking to

an influencer, be yourself.

Do not try to underestimate who you are.

Step number two: listen.

Some people think that it's how you talk is

the most important thing at a networking event.

This cannot be further from truth.

The most important thing is how you listen.

You need to listen a lot more than you talk.

Make this all about them.

Don't make it about yourself.

Don't be, me, me, me, me, me, let me tell you about me.

Listen to them.

Let them talk.

And don't just pretend to listen when

in reality you are maybe thinking about your own thing

or maybe scanning the room for somebody else.

Actually, truly listen.

Listen, ask questions, make thoughtful comments.

Show them that you're very interested in this one person.

Be very real in your interest.

Don't fake it.

Find something very interesting about that person,

there's always something, and ask questions about that.

People will remember you if you listen.

People love to talk, right?

And so most people out there are gonna be talkers,

and if you are a listener,

a smart listener who asks questions,

who comments on what they say, they will remember you,

and they will appreciate you for who you are.

Step number three: build a connection.

This is a continuation of step number two.

While you're listening, you are trying to establish

a connection, and the easiest way to establish

a connection is to find a common ground.

So as a person is talking, you're trying to find

some common interests that you may have,

some commonality in your business,

maybe some people you know in common,

but you're looking for that common ground to build

a connection with this person.

Finding a common ground

is the fastest way to build a connection.

Step number four: state your elevator pitch,

focusing on the benefits to your clients.

Here is what I mean by that:

at some point in your conversation, if you've been listening

and asking questions and building a meaningful connection,

the other person will ask you, "So what do you do?"

And this is your moment to shine,

this is your moment to say exactly what you do,

and it's very important to state it in

a way that shows benefits versus what you do.

Here is an example:

"So what do you do?"

"Oh, I do web design."

Okay, it was informative; yes, I understand what you do,

you do web design, but that tells me nothing.

It tells me absolutely nothing about what you do.

Versus, "So what do you do?"

"Oh, I help small business owners build websites

"that convert leads into prospects and clients."

Now you stated not just what you do,

but how what you do benefits your clients,

and that is huge at a networking event

because you don't wanna just tell everyone what you do.

You want them to have

a very clear idea how you can help them

or how you can help people that they know.

Step number five: be generous in your offer to help.

When you're building those connections at

a networking event, other than listening carefully,

it's very important to think of ways

how you can help the other person.

That should be the first thought in your mind,

not, ooh, I wonder how he can help me,

oh hmm, I just found a way how he can possibly help me.

No.

How I can help her.

Let me think who I know,

let me think what can I do to help her in her business.

You may think of some ideas right away on the spot

or you may tell them, "You know what?

"This sounds really interesting.

"Let me think who I know

"who may benefit from your services."

Remember, giving not receiving.

Receiving will eventually come, it always does,

but you need to start from giving.

And step number six: call to action.

Don't just end the conversation with,

"Oh, well, you know, it's nice meeting you.

"Bye, have fun."

Now that you've hopefully built a connection with

the other person, hopefully you've found some common ground,

you know a lot about them, they now know what you do

and how you help your clients,

finish it off with a call to action,

and call to action could be anything.

It could be, "Let's exchange business cards

"and maybe get together for lunch."

Or, "Let me give you a call next week.

"I know of somebody who may be interested in your services,

"let me tell you who it is next week when we talk."

Or "Let me send you an email with a couple of ideas

"that I have that may take your business to the next level."

or anything like that, but end it with a call to action.

End it with something tangible that you are planning to do.

And do follow up.

If you promised that you were gonna call next week,

if you were gonna email, please follow up.

Even if this conversation didn't lead to

a specific call to action,

still always follow up with anybody you spoke to.

Tell them how excited you were to meet them.

Mention something from what they told you.

Remember, you were listening

and you were actually asking questions.

So something about that person that they mentioned,

include it in that email.

Mention it because it shows

that you actually were listening,

that you were paying attention.

You're gonna be one of a very few people

in that networking event who actually paid attention,

and people remember that.

I hope you found this six steps helpful,

and I hope you're going to implement them right away.

And for more training videos,

you can subscribe to my channel

or you can visit my website at ByVictoriaL.com.

If you liked this video, please hit like and share buttons,

and good luck with everything.

I will see you in my next video.

For more infomation >> Public Speaking How To: 6 Steps to Ace Any Networking Event and Gain Connections and Clients - Duration: 8:51.

-------------------------------------------

SAFERPLAY_Playable Space - Public space (Case study) - Duration: 6:18.

Children play all the time.

They do not find entertainment only at playgrounds

or areas dedicated to play,

the whole of public space serves them for play.

Thanks to play children gain experience important

for their development.

When public space is designed,

let us keep in mind children´s need to play all the time.

In this lesson, we will look at the factors which make

public space appealing and inspirational to children.

Let us focus on two public spaces in Prague:

a square in a residential quarter

and a pedestrian zone of a university campus

by the National Technical Library.

These two places have become the centres of public life

and a popular destination for children and families.

Let us explore why.

First of all, it is important to have a safe place.

Parents are then not afraid to give children freedom of movement.

Areas where space is clearly defined

gives a safe impression,

they are well organized and car traffic is either excluded entirely

or at least restricted in their neighbourhood.

On one side National technical library

the area is defined by short grass and terrain modulations

clearly distinguishing the green zone from the surrounding urban area.

The pedestrian zone on the other side of the National Technical Library

is defined by its surface.

It is different from the adjacent road.

The space is also delineated by traffic bollards.

This boundary, as we can see, is also perceived by children.

This square in the residential quarter is delineated by four local roads

where car traffic is significantly restricted.

The term affordance means the potential inherent in a place or an element at stake.

We should perceive space and its parts not only

for their primary purpose or physical properties,

but also with regard to broader use opportunities.

Also, through children´s eyes.

Bicycle stands serve primarily

for leaving bikes in them.

For children, this type of equipment

can be a tunnel or a climbing structure.

There are also traffic poles that serve for play.

These are slalom poles when riding a scooter,

they can be a place with a view

or a mini stage for dancing.

Massive unique benches by the National Technical Library

offer many ways of utilization.

You can sit on them,

they can also serve as two-level benches for a group of people,

a place for picnicking,

working table and as a satisfying play element.

The material used and the finish of surfaces

and pathways determine their use.

Mild slopes of concrete pathways around the National Technical Library

enable children to run or ride.

Smooth surfaces are also suitable for drawing with chalk

or jumping rope.

When selecting materials and elements for public space

that includes children,

more than the primary use should be considered.

Children like different height levels

which they use to test and improve their physical abilities.

Undulated green areas represent imaginary, dreamy

landscape in children´s scale where they can run,

roll and sled in winter.

Explicitly technical elements like steps,

elevated containers around trees or a draining canal

do not escape their attention.

Children find water very attractive.

Children have contact with various materials

in this square: stone,

wood, concrete and bronze.

They discover that metal which is normally cold

becomes hot in the sun,

while wood remains at a stable temperature.

Bronze statues by Michal David

located by water cascades in the square

provide children with great opportunities for imagination.

When playing, children saddle up horses,

ide them in wild nature,

harness them to carriage

or just talk to them.

Moreover, the fountain is filled with boulders,

loose elements.

These enable children to modify

the play area according to their desire.

Trees provide welcoming shade,

reate intimacy of the space and thus enhance the liability of the area.

Maintained grass surfaces can partially

replace furniture in summer months.

Public space can work well

if there are facilities like public toilets,

drinking water and refreshment options.

In this square,

there is a drinking fountain

and there are several restaurants in the neighbourhood.

When we design child friendly public space,

it should be safe,

flexible,

supplemented with greenery

and supporting facilities.

Inspirational materials and loose elements are welcome.

We have investigated spaces which are not playgrounds,

still children like to play in them.

And their play thus becomes a part of city life.

For more infomation >> SAFERPLAY_Playable Space - Public space (Case study) - Duration: 6:18.

-------------------------------------------

Presentation of the omnibus public safety finance bill - Duration: 9:10.

BIPARTISAN WE TO

DO MORE. TO TACKLE THE ISSUE OF

HEALTHCARE COSTS. WE FOCUSED A

LOT ON A PAIR SIDE BUT THE

FACT IS

WE ARE NOT GETTING TO THE COST. WERE NOT GETTING TO ROOT CAUSES AND UNTIL WE DO THAT WE ARE GOING TO

CHASING OUR TAILS. SO I JUST WANT TO PUT THAT

OUT THERE. THE CAUSE IS AVAILABLE

TO US. THE

ROOT CAUSE THAT'S WHAT WE NEED

TO TACKLE. >> HOUSE SPEAKER DAUDT:

DISCUSSION ON THE A -

88 AMENDMENTS?

I RECOGNIZE THE MEMBER FROM ST. LOUIS REPRESENTATIVE SCHULTZ. >> REPRESENTATIVE SCHULTZ: THANK YOU; MR. SPEAKER. WELL I'M A LITTLE WORRIED WERE TO

SPEND $251;000 WHEN I KNOW THAT

ARE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT

OF HEALTH IN OUR GREAT GROUP OF

HEALTH ECONOMIST ARE WILLING TO TACKLE THIS BUT ALSO BECAUSE AS

A HOUSE HEALTHCARE ECONOMIST

WE ALREADY HAVE SO MUCH INFORMATION THAT

TELLS US WHAT WE SPENT A LOT MORE

ON HEALTHCARE AND CERTAIN AREAS

OF MINNESOTA IN THE DULUTH AREA IN THE

ROCHESTER AREA. THERE'S A REALLY GOOD ARTICLE BY ONE OF

THE LEADING HEALTH ECONOMIST IN

THE COUNTRY [INAUDIBLE] REINHARDT AND THE TITLE OF

THE ARTICLE

IT'S THE PRICES; STUPID. THAT'S THE TITLE.

IT'S THE PRICES OF HEALTHCARE THAT

ARE DRIVING HIGHER HEALTH

INSURANCE PREMIUMS AND THE PRICES IN DULUTH OR HIGHER

BECAUSE WE HAVE TO PAY MORE TO

ATTRACT PROVIDERS TO PRACTICE THERE. WE ALSO HAVE TO

COST SHIFT ONTO PRIVATE

PAYERS BECAUSE

REIMBURSEMENT LEVELS FOR MA AND MEDICARE ARE

SO LOW IN THE

ROCHESTER AREA THE PRICES ARE HIGHER BECAUSE MAIL

PROVIDERS PROVIDES

HIGH-QUALITY CARE AND REIMBURSEMENT

THEIR PROVIDERS AT A HIGHER LEVEL

TO GET THAT HIGH QUALITY

OF CARE. SO WE DO NOT NEED TO SPEND

$251;000 ON A REPORT BY

THE OLA WHO IS NOT AN EXPERT

IN HEALTHCARE ECONOMICS. WE HAVE AN AGENCY AND PEOPLE EMPLOYED

THAT WE ALREADY PAY TO DO THIS

STUDY IN THERE SO MUCH INFORMATION OUT THERE

RIGHT NOW I WOULD BE HAPPY TO DO

THE ANALYSIS FOR THE

LEGISLATIVE BODY AND TALK ABOUT WHY PRICES

ARE HIGH AND SAVE STATE

TAXPAYERS $251;000. >> HOUSE

SPEAKER DAUDT: DISCUSSION TO

THE SPAM? I RECOGNIZE THE MEMBER FROM

GOODHUE

REPRESENTATIVE HALEY >>

REPRESENTATIVE HILSTROM: I APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS

AND REPRESENTATIVE HALVERSON I SHOULD MAKE A

CLARIFYING STATEMENT.

HEALTH INSURANCE IS EXPENSIVE BECAUSE HEALTHCARE

IS EXPENSIVE. THAT IS WHAT I MEANT

TO SAY.

I APPRECIATE YOUR ROUNDING OUT THAT DISCUSSION.

TO REPRESENTATIVE SCHULTZ; I WANT TO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT I'VE ACTUALLY MET WITH MR.

GILDA MEISTERTHE

HEALTH ECONOMIST AND I'VE MET WITH THE OLA. I'VE MET

WITH THE HEALTH PLANS I MET WITH IT A PERMANENT HEALTH

ALL OF THOSE FOLKS AROUND THE TABLE AGREE THAT THIS STUDY IS A GOOD STEP. YES; MR. GILDA MEISTER

HAS INFORMATION

. YES THE DEPARTMENT HAS INFORMATION YES; COMMERCE HAS INFORMATION BUT I'VE NOT SEEN THOSE GROUPS ALL COME TOGETHER AND

REVIEW INFORMATION SINCE THE ACA

WAS IMPLEMENTED

TO UNDERSTAND THE COST DISPARITIES IN THE NINE GEOGRAPHIC RATING AREAS

THAT IS ALL THE AMENDMENT IS ABOUT

AND ALL THAT

MY PROVISION IN THE BILL IS ABOUT AND I

WOULD ENCOURAGE A RED VOTE SO

THIS BODY HAS

NONPARTISAN INFORMATION IN A

SINGLE FORMAT THAT WE CAN ALL DIGEST

NEXT JANUARY AND THEN

MOVE FORWARD WITH A SOLUTION TO HELP THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.

THANK YOU. >> HOUSE SPEAKER DAUDT: I RECOGNIZE THE MEMBER FROM

ST. LOUIS REPRESENTATIVE SCHULTZ >> REPRESENTATIVE SCHULTZ:

THANK YOU; MR. SPEAKER I WANT MAKE SURE WERE USING THE SAME TERMINOLOGY WHEN WE USE IT GOING FORWARD. WE

DON'T KNOW WHAT THE ACTUAL COST OF

HEALTHCARE ARE. BECAUSE WE

DON'T ASK

THE PROVIDERS TO PROVIDE THAT INFORMATION.

WE KNOW WITH THE REIMBURSEMENT

LEVELS ARE AND THOSE ARE HIGH

AND THAT IS

THE PRICE. PRICE AND COST ARE NOT THE SAME THING.

WE ASSU

ME THAT COSTS ARE HIGH BECAUSE PRICES ARE SO HIGH BUT THAT MAY NOT ACTUALLY BE TRUE AND THERE'S A LOT OF COST SHIFTING IN HEALTHCARE.

SO JUST TO GET THE TERMINOLOGY RIGHT

AND IFF THEY DID; IF

STEPHAN-HEALTHCARE ECONOMIST

SAID THIS IS A GOOD STUDY I'D LIKE TO SEE THAT IN WRITINGAND

SOME EVIDENCE THAT

THEY BELIEVE THIS IS WHERE OUR MONEY SHOULD

BE SPENT IN THE STATE

OF MINNESOTA. >> HOUSE SPEAKER DAUDT: SEE NO

FURTHER DISCUSSION-I RECOGNIZE THE MEMBER FROM WASHINGTON

REPRESENTATIVE DEAN

>> REPRESENTATIVE DEAN: I LIKE TO SPEAK IN SUPPORT OF

REPRESENTATIVE HALEY'S

AMENDMENT AND I CURSE MEMBERS TO

VOTE YES. >> HOUSE

SPEAKER DAUDT: >> HOUSE SPEAKER: SEEN OVER

THE DISCUSSION ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY; AYE. [CHORUS OF AYES.] OPPOSED; NAY.

THE MOTION PREVAILS. THE AMENDMENT

IS ADOPTED. >> [GAVEL] >> HOUSE SPEAKER: BE REP

HE JOHNSON

LITERACY OFFERS THE FOLLOWING

AMENDMENT TO THE CLERK WILL REPORT THE AMENDMENT. >> CHIEF

CLERK: JOHNSON LITERACY MOVED TO AMEND HOUSE

FILE 3138 SECOND ENGROSSMENT AS AMENDED AS FOLLOWS.

THE AMENDMENT IS CODED A

- 94. >>

HOUSE SPEAKER: I RECOGNIZE THE MEMBER FROM NICKEL IT TO ASK LANE

HAS BEEN >>

REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON: THANK YOU; MR. SPEAKER AND MEMBERS I OFFER A AMENDMENT THAT DEALS WITH MINNESOTA CARE

BUY-IN COULD YOU FOR THE GOVERNOR SPEAK ABOUT IT TWICE AT THE LAST TWO STATE OF

THE STATE IT'S AN ISSUE THAT'S TALK ABOUT ACROSS THE STATE

OF MINNESOTA AND

YET THERE'S LANGUAGE IN THIS BILL

THAT REMOVES THE ABILITY

OF DHS TO EVEN DEAL WITH MINNESOTA CARE

BUY-IN. SO

THE PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT IS TO REMOVE

THAT LANGUAGE

IT'S AN IMPORTANT AMENDMENT AND I WOULD LIKE A ROLLCALL ON

THE AMENDMENT. >>

HOUSE SPEAKER: ROLL CALL HAVING BEEN REQUESTED; SEEING FIFTEEN HANDS THERE WILL BE A ROLL CALL.

REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON.

>> REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON: THERE SOME PRETTY BAD NEWS

THIS FALL. WHEN 116;000

MINNESOTA FAMILIES; AN ADDITIONAL

116;000 MINNESOTANS WITHOUT

HEALTH INSURANCE.

THAT PLACE OF THOSE FAMILIES IN A REALLY INSEC

URE POSITION. IT CREATES INSECURITY FOR

THOSE FAMILIESWITH RESPECT TO

THEIR HEALTHCARE. IF YOU DON'T HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE YOU LIKELY DON'T GO TO THE DOCTOR.

YOU DON'T PREVENT DISEASES AND

[INAUDIBLE] A GREAT HEALTH INSECURITY AND

CERTAINLY CREATES

FINANCIAL INSECURITY. WHEN THAT IS

HAPPENING MINNESOTA HAS TO ADDRESS

THE PROBLEM AND MINNESOTANS ARE ABSOLUTELY TELLING US TIME

AND AGAIN I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU ARE NOT HERE. I KNOW YOU ARE HEARING IT

THAT THEY NEED MORE OPTIONS ANY BETTER

OPTIONS PARTICULARLY IN THE INDIVIDUAL HEALTH

INSURANCE MARKET. YET THIS LANGUAGE AGAIN IN

THIS BILL

WOULD REMOVE AN IMPORTANT OPTION THE MANY MINNESOTANS ARE

TALKING ABOUT.

THERE'S BEEN NO HEARING ON THIS BILL. ON THE

BILL.

I [INAUDIBLE] THERE'S BEEN NO HEARING I'VE ASKED A DOZEN TIMES AT LEAST FOR A HEARING ON IT. YET; INSERTED IN

THIS BILL IS THERE TO REMOVE THE POSSIBILITY OF MINNESOTA'S EVEN CONSIDERING THE MINNESOTA

CARE BUY-IN.

AGAIN; THIS AMENDMENT WOULD REMOVE

THAT LANGUAGE MINNESOTANS

ONE OPTIONS. WE HEARD THEM I ATTENDED THREE TOWN HALLS I BELIEVE THERE'S HALF A DOZEN

TOWN HALLS HELD ACROSS

THE STATE AND

WE HEARD WHERE I WAS IN WILMER; WITH HUNTING AND

ST. CLOUD I BELIEVE

THERE'S TOWNHOMES WHITE BEAR LAKE AND

UPPING DULUTH WHERE MINNESOTANS SAID; GIVE US A CHANCE. LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT THAT. LET'S AT LEAST TAKE A LOOK AT MINNESOTA

CARE BUY-IN. YET; THERE'S LANGUAGE IN THIS BILL TO REMOVE

THAT POSSIBILITY. TODAY; THE MINNESOTA

FARMERS UNION RELEASED A REPORT WHAT DO RURAL

PEOPLE THINK HIGHLIGHTED IN

THE REPORT RIGHT AT THE TOP OF

THE REPORT IS THAT HEALTH

INSURANCE COSTS AND HEALTH

CARE ACCESS OUR CRITICAL ISSUE FOR RUR

AL MINNESOTANS. I KNOW THIS

BECAUSE I'M THE RURAL MINNESOTANS WHERE I LIVE SURE THAT VERY STRONG FEELING AND THEY NEED IT. THE

FARMERS UNION CONCLUDED THAT

ACROSS MINNESOTA THE COST OF

HEALTHCARE DOMINATED THE LIST OF WHAT IS ON PEOPLE'S MINDS

BOTH IN 2017

AND 2018. AGAIN; THESE HEARINGS ARE HE

LD ACROSS HAVING THIS IS THE

SECOND SET THE PREVIOUS YEAR THEY

WERE HELD IN THE SUMMER EVEN MORE HEARINGS ACROSS

THE STATE BY THE FARMERS UNION AND

IT REAFFIRMS THE FEELING IN

RURAL MINNESOTA. SO MEMBERS FROM RURAL MINNESOTA I HOPE

YOU'RE LISTENING TO THIS DEBATE TODAY.

[INAUDIBLE

] IT WAS NOTED IN MOST LIMITS EVEN WHILE THE GOVERNOR HAS PROPOSED A PUBLIC

OPTION FINANCE TO THE MINNESOTA

CARE PROGRAM

THE LEGISLATURE HAS HELD NO PUBLIC

HEARING ON IT THIS YEAR AND NOT GIVING IT

ANY CONSIDERATION. THIS

WAS VIEWED AS A MAJO

R DISAPPOINTMENT UNDERSTANDABLY

SO. AGAIN; PARTICULARLY IN

RURAL MINNESOTA THEY NEED

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét