Thứ Tư, 11 tháng 10, 2017

News on Youtube Oct 11 2017

POLITICO WITH YET ANOTHER ARTICLE THAT IS FURTHERING

ESTABLISHMENT CONVENTIONAL WISDOM.

WELL, COULDN'T HAVE GUESSED THAT.

SO THIS IS THE OLDEST TRICK IN THE BOOK, AND THIS IS WHAT

THEY DO EVERY TIME.

BY DAY, I DON'T MEAN POLITICO.

I'VE SEEN THIS AT THOUSAND TIMES IN THE ESTABLISHMENT PRESS.

THE MIDDLE THAT PROGRESSIVES GET ANY DEGREE OF STRENGTH OR

ANY WINDS AND NOW WE HAVE THE MOST POPULAR POLITICIAN IN

THE COUNTRY ON OUR SIDE, THAT IS BERNIE SANDERS.

THEY HAVE TO RIP HIM DOWN AND THEY HAVE TO SAY, HEY,

PROGRESSIVES, DON'T GET ANY SMART IDEAS.

THE COUNTRY IS NOT GOING TO GO IN YOUR DIRECTION IN THE

SO-CALLED OBJECTIVE MEDIA IS GOING TO HELP PUSH OUT THIS

IDEA FOR THE DEMOCRATIC ESTABLISHMENT.

THIS IS WRITTEN BY ALAN GLENN BUD.

THE TITLE OF THE PIECE IS: THIS IS THE CONVENTIONAL WISDOM

THAT THE ESTABLISHMENT MEDIA PUTS ALL THE TIME.

2 THINGS THEY SAY THAT MAKES NO SENSE AND ARE COMPLETELY

ANTIQUATED.

ALL POLITICS IS LOCAL, TIP O'NEILL SAID THAT.

CONGRATULATIONS THAT YOU REMEMBER THAT QUOTE THE

EVERYONE ELSE IN THE WORLD USES AND IT'S NOT REMOTELY TRUE.

ALL POLITICS IS LOCAL WHEN HE SAID IN THE 1970S WHEN EVERYONE

READ THEIR LOCAL NEWSPAPERS AND THERE WAS NO INTERNET.

ALL POLITICS IS NOT LOCAL NOW.

IT IS NOT REMOTELY LOCAL.

THAT IS JUST A STATEMENT YOU SAY BECAUSE YOU HAVEN'T

ACTUALLY ANALYZED ANYTHING, AND THEN THIS IS WHAT THEY SAY

WHEN IT COMES TO PROGRESSIVES GAINING ANY STRENGTH.

REMEMBER MCGOVERN.

YES, WE ALL KNOW.

THAT WAS 1972.

THAT WASN'T 45 YEARS AGO, HE DID ANOTHER SOUND LIKE IT WAS

THOUGHT THAT WAS 1 MILLION YEARS AGO WHEN THE COUNTRY WAS

COMPLETELY DIFFERENT BUT NONETHELESS THEY SAY THE

PARTY'S PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE, THE ULTRALIBERAL SENATOR IS

MCGOVERN OF SOUTH DAKOTA WENT ON TO LOSE 49 STATES AND ONE

OF THE MOST WAS THAT EVICTING FOR AN AMERICAN HISTORY.

RIVER THAT 1972 WHEN MCGOVERN LOST TO NIXON?

I KNOW, YOU REMIND ME EVERY SINGLE DAY, EVERY TIME THAT ANY

PROGRESSIVE HAS ANY MOMENTUM, MERTON GOVERNED, MCGOVERN.

1972, ARE YOU KIDDING NOW TO BE FAIR TO GREENBLATT HERE, HE DID

HAVE ONE QUOTE THAT AT LEAST ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT IS A

DIFFERENT COUNTRY.

HE SAID:

SO THAT IS ONE OF THE THINGS THAT MAKES IT COMPLETELY

DIFFERENT THAN 1972 SO WHEN NIXON TALKED ABOUT THE

SILENT MAJORITY, THEY WERE IN FACT THE MAJORITY.

I WONDER IF THAT HAD SOMETHING TO DO WITH WINNING ALL OF

THE SELECTIONS?

AND IN ALL OF THESE ARTICLES IN ALL THE ANALYSIS THEY NEVER

TALK ABOUT HOW MCGOVERN WATCHED HIS VICE PRESIDENTIAL PICK

AND THAT THAT MADE A GIANT DIFFERENCE SO THEY JUST

SAY, OH NO, HE WAS LIBERAL AND PEOPLE DON'T LIKE LIBERALS.

HE MENTIONS THE DEMOGRAPHICS.

WHAT HE DOESN'T MENTION IS THE POLLING AND WHAT THE

COUNTRY ACTUALLY THINKS THAT'S A DON'T WORRY GUYS, I HAVE

THAT FOR YOU AND I'M GOING TO SHARE WITH YOU BECAUSE

APPARENTLY THE ESTABLISHMENT PRESS CANCEL LOOKUP FACTS

SO I'M GOING TO HELP THEM.

NOW HE GOES ON TO QUOTE PEOPLE THAT ARE PART OF THE OLDER

GENERATION OF DEMOCRATS WHO WERE LIKE OH MY GOD, DON'T EVER

RUN A LIBERAL.

HERE IS FREDRIK LOGEVALL WHO APPARENTLY IS A HISTORIAN

OF SORTS, STILL SUCK IN THE VIETNAM ERA.

TO BE FAIR YOU ARE HISTORIAN AND YOUR JOB IS TO COVER AGE IN

HISTORY AND THAT IS WHAT YOU ARE DOING BUT THAT IS AN EASY

WAY TO PANIC PEOPLE.

THAT WAS 1972.

HERE'S ANOTHER PERSON, LAWRENCE JACOBS, SAME IDEA.

NO, WE WERE AGGRIEVED WAY BEFORE DONALD TRUMP 1.

AS NAOMI KLEIN JUST TOLD ME AN INTERVIEW I DID EARLIER

TODAY, SHE SAID IF WE GO BACK TO BEFORE DONALD TRUMP, WHICH

IS WHAT THE DEMOCRAT ESTABLISHMENT WANTS, LET'S

GO BACK TO WHEN TIMES WERE NORMAL.

NO, THAT'S WHEN TIMES WERE SO BAD WE WANT UP ELECTING

DONALD TRUMP.

BUT IS NOT A POSITIVE TIME TO GO BACK TO.

BUT IT IS NOT JUST BASED ON THAT, IT IS ABOUT REALITY

THAT THE ESTABLISHMENT IS IN FACT READING THE SYSTEM

AGAINST THE AVERAGE AMERICAN.

THE MINIMUM WAGE OF $7.25 AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL.

THAT IS INSANE.

IT HASN'T KEPT UP WITH INFLATION, OR ANYTHING IN THE

NEW TELL ME BECAUSE GIANT DONORS ARE PUTTING MONEY IN AND THEY

LIKE LOWER WAGES, THEY LIKE DEREGULATION, THEY LIKE LOWER

TAXES BUT YOU WERE TELLING ME IT IS A COINCIDENCE THEY GET

EVERYTHING THEY WANT AND THEN YOU TELL IT RADICALIZATION

TO SAY HEY, MAYBE WE SHOULD LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY WHERE THE

VOTERS MATTER INSTEAD OF THE DONORS.

BY THE WAY, I AM NOT ALONE ON THIS.

93% OF AMERICANS THINK THAT THE POLITICIANS REPRESENT THEIR

DONORS INTERESTS OVER THERE VOTERS INTERESTS.

OVER NINE IN 10 AMERICANS BELIEVE THAT WE HAVE THAT KIND

OF FUNDAMENTAL CORRUPTION BUT NOT IN WASHINGTON, NOT IF YOU

ARE A REPORTER OR A HISTORIAN OR POLITICAL SCIENTIST.

THEY ARE ALL LIKE, THAT IS RADICAL.

RADICAL TO SAY THAT THESE GUYS ARE SELLOUTS TO WORK FOR DONORS.

THAT WAY NEVER SEEN ON TELEVISION.

I'M GOING TO GET THE NUMBERS AGAIN IN A SECOND SO BEAR

WITH ME AS I GIVE YOU ONE MORE MADDENING QUOTE FROM THE

AUTHOR HERE.

THIS IS HIM, HE IS NOT QUOTING ANYONE ELSE.

BECAUSE IF YOU LIVE IN WASHINGTON, THE POLITICAL

CENTER OF GRAVITY IS CENTER-RIGHT.

AND THE RIGHT WING IS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING IN THE

DEMOCRATS, IF THEY HAVE ENOUGH SENSIBLE ABOUT THEIR HEADS

AND LISTEN TO THEM.

IS IT ACTUALLY TRUE?

NO, IT IS NOT REMOTELY TRUE; NUMBER OF POLES FOR YOU.

EXPENDING SOCIAL SECURITY.

NOT CUTTING SOCIAL SECURITY WHICH IS WHAT THE SO-CALLED

MODERATES WANT TO DO IN WASHINGTON, NO.

EXPENDING SOCIAL SECURITY IS SUPPORTED BY 72% OF AMERICANS.

GIANT ADVANTAGE THERE.

RAISING TAXES ON THE RICH, 52% OF AMERICANS SUPPORTED.

THEY DON'T SUPPORT CUTTING TAXES THEY SUPPORT RAISING TAXES

ON THE REST IF YOU THINK THAT IS A RADICAL POSITION THEN YOU

JUST CALL THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS RADICAL.

INCREASING MILITARY SPENDING BY CUTTING STATE AND EPA FUNDING.

NO, AMERICANS DON'T WANT IT.

THEY WOULD RATHER HAVE NEPA FUNDING THEN MILITARY SPENDING.

THEY 58% OPPOSE THAT.

THAT IS A DIAMOND OR MAJORITY SAYING NO, I DON'T WANT

MORE MILITARY SPENDING TIME WOULD RATHER HAVE

ENVIRONMENTAL SPENDING BUT YOU WILL NEVER SEE THAT IN A

MAINSTREAM PUBLICATION.

AND CNN POLLS, THEY NEVER EVEN QUOTE THEIR OWN POLL.

THEY MENTIONED AT THE FIRST TIME HE CAME OUT AND THEY GOING

TO HAVE ALL OF THEIR PUNDITS JUST LIKE POLITICAL AND

EVERYONE ELSE GO OUT AND GO THE COUNTRY LAST DEFENSE SPENDING.

IT'S JUST NOT TRUE BUT THEY SAY ANYWAY.

RAISING THE MINIMUM WAGE TO 10 THAT $10.10.

THAT IS ONLY SUPPORTED BY 66% OF THE AMERICANS.

ONLY 26% OPPOSE IT.

2/3 OF THE COUNTRY SAYS FOR GOD SAKES, AND RAISE THE

MINIMUM WAGE.

TO EVER SEE THAT ON TV OR POLITICAL?

KNOW THEY CALL THAT RADICAL THAT YOU ARE CALLING TWO THIRDS

OF THE COUNTRY RADICAL.

WHO IS ACTUAL RADICAL?

MY PROPOSAL IS THAT THE ESTABLISHMENT WASHINGTON

WHETHER IT'S THE MEDIA, OR THE REPUBLICANS, OR THE

DEMOCRATIC ESTABLISHMENT, YOU ARE THE TRUE RADICALS

BECAUSE YOU REPRESENT A TINY PERCENTAGE OF THE COUNTRY.

THE DONORS I GIVE MONEY TO THOSE PARTIES AND THE ONES THAT ALSO

PUT ADS IN YOUR PUBLICATIONS AND ON YOUR TELEVISION SETS.

WHAT YOU THINK OF THE POLITICAL ADVERTISING GOES TO?

BECAUSE THE TELEVISION, CABLE NEWS AND A LOT OF THESE

ESTEEMED PUBLICATIONS INSIDE OF WASHINGTON.

SO THEY ARE INCENTIVIZED TO CALL TWO THIRDS OF THE COUNTRY

RADICAL WHEN IN REALITY, THEY REPRESENT THAT TINY

PERCENTAGE WHO WANT TAX CUTS FOR THE REGIMEN OF THE REST OF

THEM DON'T WANT IT, THEY WANT MORE DEFENSE CONTRACTORS ETC.,

BUT I'M NOT DONE YET WITH THE POLLS BECAUSE WE ARE RIGHT

AND YOU ARE WRONG.

MEDICARE FOR ALL.

60% SUPPORTED.

THAT IS RADICAL?

60% OF THE COUNTRY SUPPORTS IT.

HE JUST CALLED IT RADICAL, SAID THAT IS NOT THE CENTER OF

GRAVITY IN THE COUNTRY.

WELL, YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY WRONG ON THE NUMBERS.

OKAY.

IMMIGRATION REFORM.

90% SUPPORT PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP ACCORDING TO CNN.

YOU GET ESSENCE IN ETERNITY BE?

WHEN YOU READ POLITICO?

GAY MARRIAGE, 64% SUPPORTED.

LEGALIZING MARIJUANA, WHAT GETS LEFT ON WASHINGTON.

61% OF THE COUNTRY SUPPORTS IT.

YOU ARE WRONG AND WE ARE RIGHT.

NOT BECAUSE WE HAVE DIFFERING OPINIONS, WE ARE RIGHT

ABOUT WHERE THE CENTER OF THE COUNTRY IS.

IT'S BASED ON NUMBERS, IT'S BASED ON STATISTICS, IT'S

BASED ON SCIENCE AND NOW, YOU WILL LARRY IS A SEE THE

ESTABLISHMENT PRESS THAT ARE AGGRIEVED BY US POINTING

OUT FACTS TURNAROUND AND GO PULLING.

EVEN THOUGH THEY USE PULLING 1000 TIMES,

1000 THOUSAND TIMES AND THEY'VE YELLED THAT REPUBLICAN

SOMETIMES THE QUESTION THE POLLING.

THEY WILL NOW GO POLLING, YOU CAN'T TRUST PULLING.

YOU'RE JUST CHERRY PICKING.

CHERRY PICKING?

I JUST SHOWED YOU ALMOST EVERY SINGLE ISSUE.

HERE, YOU CHERRY PICK.

SEE IF YOU CAN FIND POLLS THAT ARE DIFFERENT THAN THIS.

SEE IF YOU CAN FIND THE AVERAGE OF POLES ON THIS ISSUE.

WE ARE RIGHT AND YOU ARE WRONG.

YOU ARE THE RADICAL.

YOU REPRESENT THE TINY MINORITY, WE REPRESENT THE MAJORITY.

IT IS NOT 1972.

IT'S THE YEAR 2017

AND PROGRESSIVES WILL WIN AND WE WILL GET OUR IDEOLOGY THAT

ACTUALLY MATCHES THE TRUE CENTER OF THE COUNTRY.

AND I KNOW, YOU'RE NEVER EVER GOING TO WRITE THAT,

BECAUSE IT IS NOT THAT ALAN GREENBLATT IS A BAD GUY.

COURSE NOT, I DON'T WANT YOU TO GET THE WRONG IDEA THIS

POLITICAL SCIENTIST, THEY ARE NOT BAD GUYS THERE JUST

INSIDE THE BUBBLE AND THEY CAN'T SEE STRAIGHT.

I WAS JUST IN WASHINGTON, IT HAPPENS EVERY TIME I GO THERE.

EVERYONE IN WASHINGTON THINKS THE ESTABLISHMENT IS AWESOME.

AND THINGS WILL ALWAYS REMAIN THE SAME AND ANYONE WHO

DOESN'T AGREE THAT WE SHOULD GIVE ALL THE MONEY TO

DEFENSE CONTRACTORS, ALL THE MONEY FOR THE OIL COMPANIES, ALL

OF THE MONEY TO THE BANKS, AND CRUSH THE WAGES AND DO ALL THE

OTHER THINGS, ANYONE WHO DOESN'T BELIEVE THAT IS A RADICAL.

RADICAL.

POPULIST, OH MY GOD.

THE COUNTRIES WITH US AND YOU WONDER WHY POLITICIANS POLL

SO LOW AND WHY THE MEDIA POLLS SO LOW.

IT'S PARTLY THE REPUBLICAN ATTACKS OF COURSE, YOU HAVE

TAKE THAT INTO ACCOUNT, BUT THAT IS NOT THE ONLY THING.

THEY SLEEP BETTER AT NIGHT BY SAYING NO, IT IS UNFAIR

REPUBLICAN ATTACKS.

NO, THE REST OF THE COUNTRY DOES NOT TRUST THE ESTABLISHMENT

PRESS BECAUSE THEY ARE CORRECT.

BECAUSE THAT PRESS KEEPS LYING TO THEM OVER AND OVER

AGAIN, TELLING THEM THINGS THAT ARE NOT TRUE EVEN THOUGH

THEY ARE THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF WHAT IS TRUE.

WE ARE SICK OF IT.

YOU THINK YOU ARE CUTE AND YOU ARE FOOLING PEOPLE.

THE ONLY PERSON YOU ARE FOOLING HONESTLY IS YOURSELF

BECAUSE THEY REALLY DO BELIEVE IT IN WASHINGTON.

THEY THINK THAT THE COUNTRY IS CENTER RIGHT AND THAT WE'D

ALL BE BETTER OFF IF WE JUST DID WANT THE DONORS WANTED.

THE REST OF US ARE IN OPEN REVOLT OF THAT.

WE CANNOT STAND THAT ANYMORE, SO WHO IS RIGHT, WHO IS WRONG?

WE WILL SEE WHAT THE NEXT ELECTION.

AND ALL OF THE CRYING ISN'T GOING TO PREVENT

PROGRESSIVE PRIMARIES.

WE'RE GOING TO PRIMARY THE LIVING HELL OUT OF THEM BECAUSE

THIS IS WHAT'S KILLING THE COUNTRY.

WE'RE NOT GOING TO LET YOU GET AWAY WITH IT ANYMORE, AND

THIS ISN'T 1972.

WE'RE GOING TO WIN.

YOUNG TURKS.

For more infomation >> WAKE UP Washington, America IS Center-Left NOT Center-Right - Duration: 11:52.

-------------------------------------------

Initial Individual CPA Licensure for Washington State - Duration: 2:57.

You have passed all four sections of the CPA exam and are ready to become a licensed CPA

in Washington State.

The Washington State Board of Accountancy will work with you on applying for your initial

CPA license.

In order to become an individually licensed CPA, an applicant must first meet the 3 E's:

education, exam and experience.

Passing the four-section CPA exam is just one part of becoming licensed.

If you passed the exam as a Washington Candidate, you do not have to submit your exam scores

and education to the Board.

If you passed the exam in another jurisdiction, you will need to transfer your exam scores

and submit official transcripts to the Board.

Applicants must have at least 150 semester hours of education with a baccalaureate degree

or higher which includes accounting and business administration.

Experience may be obtained through the practice of public accounting and/or employment in

industry or government.

In certain situations, employment in academia may also provide experience to obtain some

or all of the competency requirements.

Applicants must complete a minimum of 2,000 hours and a minimum of 12 months, which must

be verified by a licensed CPA who holds a license to practice public accounting for

a minimum of 5 years.

The experience must be obtained no more than 8 years prior to the date the Board received

your license application.

Applicants must complete a course covering the complete content of the AICPA Code of

Professional Conduct Course with a passing grade of 90%.

Applicants must also complete the board approved initial course covering the Washington State

Public Accountancy Act, related Board Rules, and Board Policies with a passing grade of

90%.

Once the 3 E's of licensure are met, the applicant will visit our website, log into

My Account and create a Secure Access Washington account to apply for a license.

The link can be found on the right hand side of our home page.

The initial license application fee is $330.

After completing the online application, the applicant can either upload or submit supporting

documentation regarding education and exam requirements, experience qualifications, ethics

exams and continuing professional education, if applicable.

Once your Washington State individual license has been granted and posted in the Board's

licensee database, you can start using the CPA

to the public and the principle place of business in which those services are provided is in

Washington State.

Do you still have questions about licensure, please contact the Board directly by phone

or email.

We are here to help you.

For more infomation >> Initial Individual CPA Licensure for Washington State - Duration: 2:57.

-------------------------------------------

Underwater Hull Cleaning in Seattle, Washington - Elliott Bay Marina (SCUBA) - Duration: 3:54.

For Diving Services Email SSPDIVING@gmail.com

For more infomation >> Underwater Hull Cleaning in Seattle, Washington - Elliott Bay Marina (SCUBA) - Duration: 3:54.

-------------------------------------------

765 Sq. Ft. Cottage Near The Beach of Washington | Adorable Small House Design - Duration: 3:00.

765 Sq. Ft. Cottage Near The Beach of Washington

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét