Thứ Bảy, 2 tháng 12, 2017

News on Youtube Dec 2 2017

My name is Chico Evans, store manager at the local Home Depot in Washington, D.C.

I'm here today to support our local economy as we fight to get this thing passed as well

as our associates and our pro-contractors who would definitely benefit from the new

tax reform bill.

As I think about the associates at my particular store and the small contractors that shop

in my store, which is a significant part of our business, and how this bill is going to

impact them and make their jobs a lot easier, in the sense of being able to add additional

equipment, be able to grow their business, do all of these other different things that

I think is critical to our economy, and as well as for America.

I'm proud to be here.

Thanks for the opportunity, and I look forward for this getting passed.

For more infomation >> Tax Relief for Working Americans: Chico Evans, Manager of a Washington D.C. Home Depot - Duration: 0:54.

-------------------------------------------

Trump Just Scored Biggest Victory Of His Presidency — Democrats, Washington Rocked - Duration: 2:50.

Trump has promised to make America great again.

That has been met with plenty of opposition.

We may never know why there are people in Washington opposed to such a plan.

Yet there are both republicans and democrats who seemed determined to obstruct.

Despite their efforts, Trump continues to win.

This year has been marked with victories.

Even when liberals try to block his plans, Trump has come out the victor.

Now we are happy to announce a major victory is in the works.

Few could have foreseen this.

From Wall Street Journal:

Senate Republicans on Friday were confident that they had locked in enough votes to pass

a sweeping tax bill later in the day.

Wavering GOP senators offered their support and a holdout, worried it would add to the

deficit, all but conceded defeat.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) said Friday morning, "We have the votes."

His comment came after Sen. John Cornyn (R., Texas), the No. 2 Senate Republican, said

the party had 50 votes to pass the legislation.

Republicans control 52 seats compared with 48 for Democrats.

With no Democrats expected to support the bill and Vice President Mike Pence able to

break a tie if needed, Senate Republicans have the majority needed to clear the measure

through the Senate and open negotiations with the House to iron out differences…

Sens Pat Toomey (R., Pa.) said Friday, "We've got a great product and it's going to pass

today."

Sen. Tim Scott (R., S.C.) was also optimistic, saying senators hoped to pass the tax bill

before they went home for the weekend.

Momentum for the tax legislation picked up on Friday morning after Republicans gained

support from Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Steve Daines of Montana, helping the party

regroup after a late-evening stumble Thursday over concerns the bill would add to the budget

deficit.

This past week has seen more and more good news about this bill.

The tax bill is set to be a historic work of legislation.

All Americans will feel relief.

Bloated government spending will be reined in.

And the economy will soar.

Democrats will most likely not vote for this bill.

They will dig in their heels, as they always do.

Even though this is the thing they always promise voters, they will vote no.

So once again, it's up to republicans in Congress to make it happen.

We were worried that too many republicans will buck the President and vote no.

But it seems more and more and coming around.

Even seeming NeverTrumpers have announced they will vote yes.

And hard-lining Constitutionalists will also vote yes.

It looks like this bill will get passed.

It will be a huge win for the MAGA crowd.

And of course, even complaining liberals will benefit.

Who could be upset about that?

For more infomation >> Trump Just Scored Biggest Victory Of His Presidency — Democrats, Washington Rocked - Duration: 2:50.

-------------------------------------------

Breaking: Massive Investigation Opens Up in Washington in Wake of Franken and Conyers - Duration: 3:16.

The House Ethics Committee reportedly intends to review all claims of sexual abuse/harassment

involving members and employees of the lower chamber of Congress.

According to The Washington Post, committee charwoman Susan Brooks, a Republican, and

ranking Democrat Ted Deutch have submitted a request to the Office of Compliance demanding

that it hand over "all records … related to any claims of sexual harassment, discrimination,

retaliation, or any other employment practice prohibited."

Established in accordance with the passing of the Congressional Accountability Act of

1995, the congressional OOC advances "workplace rights, safety and health," according to

its federal webpage.

This announcement comes roughly a week and a half after the same committee launched an

investigation into Rep. John Conyers over allegations of sexual harassment.

"The Committee is aware of public allegations that Representative John Conyers, Jr. may

have engaged in sexual harassment of members of his staff, discriminated against certain

staff on the basis of age, and used official resources for impermissible personal purposes,"

Brooks and Deutch announced in a joint statement, as reported at the time by Fox News.

"The Committee … has begun an investigation and will gather additional information regarding

these allegations," the statement concluded.

The investigation was launched after news broke that Conyers, a co-founder of the Congressional

Black Caucus, had previously settled a wrongful dismissal complaint with an employee who refused

to "succumb to (Conyers') sexual advances."

The news also followed a claim in mid-November by Democrat Rep. Jackie Speier that House

members had paid out $15 million in harassment settlements over the course of a decade.

"One member of Congress has settled a claim and there has been a taxpayer settlement,"

she said on MSNBC, according to The Hill.

"We do know that there's about $15 million that has been paid out by the House on behalf

of harassers in the last 10 to 15 years."

She later clarified that not all the harassment charges necessarily pertained to sexual harassment.

It's nevertheless become exceedingly clear the House suffers a problem of bad behavior.

GOP legislators have responded accordingly by pledging to hold hearings on the harassment

settlements and expressing outrage over the recent confirmation of the existence of an

"obscure taxpayer-funded account."

Politico reported that this account has "been used to pay for sexual harassment settlements

struck by lawmakers and aides."

"Most people didn't know it existed," said GOP Rep. Tom Cole during a closed-door

House meeting this week.

"I think there's a pretty strong feeling that frankly those things ought to be public

and those things ought to be paid for by the individual responsible, not by the taxpayer."

It's unclear if Conyers made use of this obscure fund, though it seems very likely

he did.

As of early December he still remained in Congress, despite demands from even House

Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi — who initially defended him — that he resign.

However, he has at the very least stepped down from his role as a member of the House

Judiciary Committee.

For more infomation >> Breaking: Massive Investigation Opens Up in Washington in Wake of Franken and Conyers - Duration: 3:16.

-------------------------------------------

Michael Flynn pleads guilty, Republicans move closer to overhauling the tax code - Duration: 21:49.

ROBERT COSTA: President Trump's former national security adviser pleads guilty to lying

to the FBI and Republicans move closer to overhauling the tax code. I'm Robert Costa.

A legal storm and the politics of taxes, tonight on Washington Week.

Michael Flynn becomes the first Trump administration official to plead guilty to lying

to the FBI as it investigates Russian interference in the 2016 election.

The retired Army general, who also worked on the Trump campaign -

GENERAL MICHAEL FLYNN (RET.): (From video.) The next president of the United States -

ROBERT COSTA: - has promised his full coordination with the Mueller investigation.

We explain the far-reaching implications of the guilty plea. Plus -

SENATE MAJORITY LEADER MITCH MCCONNELL (R-KY): (From video.) What's in this for the

American people and for small businesses, obviously, is tax relief.

ROBERT COSTA: - Senate Republicans hoping for a legislative win fall in line and get

close to passing a long-promised tax overhaul. But who would benefit and who would pay more?

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: (From video.) This is going to cost me a fortune, this thing.

Believe me. Believe - this is not good for me.

ROBERT COSTA: Democrats disagree. They say corporations win and the middle class loses.

SENATE MINORITY LEADER CHARLES SCHUMER (D-NY): (From video.) Democrats remain united

against any middle-class tax increase.

Our economy is already stacked against working men and women.

ROBERT COSTA: Plus, as the clock ticks down to a government shutdown, can crisis be

averted? We discuss it all with Jonathan Swan of Axios, Shawna Thomas of VICE News,

Michael Crowley of POLITICO, and Alexis Simendinger of The Hill.

ANNOUNCER: Celebrating 50 years, this is Washington Week.

Once again, from Washington, moderator Robert Costa.

ROBERT COSTA: Good evening. The federal investigation into Russian meddling in last

year's election has dominated Donald Trump's presidency, and today his former national

security adviser, Michael Flynn, became the first Trump administration official to be

charged. Flynn plead guilty to lying to the FBI about his dealings with Russians last

December, before Mr. Trump took office. Flynn was then forced to resign last February,

after he misled Vice President Pence about a meeting he had with a Russian official.

And today he released a statement after his court hearing that read, in part, "My guilty

plea and agreement to cooperate with the special counsel's office reflect a decision I

made in the best interests of my family and of our country. I accept full responsibility

for my actions." The charge brings the criminal case into the Trump White House, and

certainly raises questions about who else in this administration is under scrutiny.

Joining me tonight from Washington is POLITICO's Michael Crowley, who has been covering

today's breaking news. Michael, so great to have you with us. You've been editing and

writing all day. And the big question is, what does this reveal, this news about General

Flynn, this decision to cooperate? What does it reveal about how President Trump could

be affected, his own decisions and relationships and conversations during the transition?

MICHAEL CROWLEY: Thanks, Robert. Well, it reveals that Robert Mueller is getting

deeper and deeper into the Trump White House. Obviously, what you have here is Michael

Flynn, former national security adviser, who himself held a very senior position in the

Trump White House. But what's interesting is that in this plea agreement Flynn is making

reference to senior officials around him who participated in conversations he had about

which he later lied to the FBI. So you have the inherent drama of a president's national

security adviser pleading guilty to the crime of lying to the FBI, describing activities

which are, at minimum, highly controversial and some people say potentially illegal in

terms of his activities, specifically - particularly in talking to the Russians.

But then you have the question of who are the bigger fish here that Mueller might be

preparing to fry with Flynn's cooperation?

ROBERT COSTA: And with regard to those bigger fish he may be trying to interrogate and

get questions from, this was a signal, perhaps, to future witnesses to not lie, that this

special counsel takes that seriously. And if you lie, you're in trouble.

MICHAEL CROWLEY: Absolutely. This is the second time we've seen court documents that

are part of the Mueller investigation which show that someone has pleaded to lying and

is now cooperating with the investigation. And a lot of legal analysts think that part

of Mueller's strategy here is to demonstrate, number one, if you lie to me I'm going to

nail you for it. And number two, I have people cooperating who know a lot of things.

They may know what you, hypothetical witness or Trump associate out there, did. And now

is the time to come forward and come clean. Do it now before your situation gets worse.

ROBERT COSTA: At the heart of what we saw today in these documents, Michael - you read

them and I read them - is this act we don't really talk a lot about, the law called the

Logan Act. And it prohibits private citizens from meddling in foreign policy. So what

did these documents, in your view, reveal about that? Was the law potentially broken

with regard to the Logan Act? Was there collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign?

MICHAEL CROWLEY: So I think that there is a clear case to be made here that this is a

potential violation of the Logan Act which, as you say, is a law that prevents private

citizens from meddling - from cooperating with a foreign government to interfere in

American foreign policy. But the Logan Act is a 1799 law that is almost never invoked

and has never successfully been used to prosecute anyone.

So I don't see anyone going to jail over a Logan Act violation.

And I certainly don't see Donald Trump being impeached over the possibility that he was

aware of or directed activity by Michael Flynn that might be considered a violation of

the Logan Act. What we have here is much more about concealment, about Flynn's lies

to the FBI, and possibly now lies or inaccurate statements by other Trump officials

regarding those activities, regarding in particular his conversations with the Russians.

On the question of collusion, I think, Robert, that you could say in a narrow sense there

was collusion here when Michael Flynn communicated with the Russian ambassador in late

December, at a time when the Obama administration was imposing new sanctions on Russia to

punish the Kremlin for its clear interference in the 2016 election.

And Flynn was signaling to the Russians: Please don't retaliate dramatically.

We're going to be coming into office next month. We want better relations with you.

Don't escalate this because we're not going to follow through on that same path.

That, you could say, is kind of a form of policy collusion, maybe a violation of the

Logan Act. What I don't see, Robert, is anything like the kind of collusion we've

been talking about more generally this last year or so, the idea that there was a

quid pro quo, that the Russians assisted Trump in return for some kind of policy

favor. It is still possible that that's the case. It's absolutely possible.

The court documents today do not advance that narrative.

ROBERT COSTA: Thank you so much, Michael. Really appreciate your time tonight.

Always great to have you on Washington Week.

MICHAEL CROWLEY: Thanks for having me.

ROBERT COSTA: Thank you. Back here at the table, it's fascinating to think about

how the White House was reacting to this today, a major moment in the presidency to

have someone from inside the administration now cooperating with the special counsel.

Jonathan, you were on the White House grounds today. What was that scene like?

What does Ty Cobb, the president's attorney on this matter, telling the president's

advisors and the president himself?

JONATHAN SWAN: Well, Ty Cobb himself has had this strategy of, you know, open kimono,

tell everyone everything, everything's going to be fine. It's been very positive talk

internally. And his strategy has been, reveal everything, we've got nothing to hide,

and there will be a swift conclusion. I would say that in the last couple of weeks

there has been growing skepticism internally that this is actually going to be the

case, that this thing's going to be wrapped up by the end of the year. And today was

really interesting because publicly, of course, they were all projecting: Everything's

fine. We're working away. But I've heard privately, personally, from several sources

in there, genuine concern about this on a number of grounds.

One being that Flynn knows a lot. He was around a lot. He was -

ROBERT COSTA: A total confidant of the president.

JONATHAN SWAN: Total. People don't understand. You understand, you were there.

Some of us covered the campaign. He was by his side the whole time. He saw everything.

And he's in a very desperate situation, frankly. He lied to the FBI. Mueller has

a ton over leverage over him. And it's very clear from this that Mueller thinks that

he has something of value to offer. And so the question being asked internally,

and it's all speculative, is what is that thing of value?

ROBERT COSTA: What about Jared Kushner, the president's son-in-law? He recently

spoke with the special counsel team. And he had relationships with Flynn, General

Flynn, during the transition. Had different conversations with foreign officials.

SHAWNA THOMAS: And he was down in Mar-a-Lago when Flynn supposedly - or, when Flynn

admits to talking to a senior administration official before he made one of the phone

calls to Russian Ambassador Kislyak - former Russian Ambassador Kislyak.

So that he - it is obvious that there is something around here that's wrapped up in that

when it comes to Jared Kushner. I think the other thing is that - one of the things

Michael Crowley said was that we still don't know if there is this, like, very formal

idea of collusion with the Russians, with Vladimir Putin.

But what this starts to point out, and Kushner is a part of this, is was there

obstruction of justice somewhere within the White House? Like, how - because of how

all of this played out with Michael Flynn, because of the president going to Comey

after Flynn was fired, all of that stuff. What does that mean? And did more people lie

about things related to that? Which, as we know, Mueller can take this wherever he wants to.

ROBERT COSTA: A new phase for Robert Mueller?

ALEXIS SIMENDINGER: It's a shot - a real shot across the bow.

In this case too, what's interesting about Michael Flynn is that the documents indicate

that there were two tracks that the special counsel was going on.

One had to do with lying to the FBI, and the other has to do with his business dealings.

And the documents suggest why Michael Flynn and his attorneys felt that they were under

such pressure, because the special counsel was suggesting, you know, we want this - this

is the lightest deal that you're going to get. This is the best deal you can get on the

lying to the FBI, because we can go down this road if you don't - if you don't cooperate.

And Michael Flynn suggested that for the good of his family he felt that that was the

best way to go. He could have gone to prison, potentially, under the law, technically,

for five years or more.

It looks like in this particular case, if he cooperates, he could do zero to six months.

So you can see why Michael Flynn, at the very beginning, why the White House is concerned

now that he, knowing so much about the campaign, knowing so much about the president,

knowing so much about the president's family - the relationships that they had in terms

of talks about the campaign - why they're so worried about it now.

JONATHAN SWAN: And that point you made is so spot-on, because to me the most telling

part of the statement for Flynn was whatever it was, for the good of my family.

This is a prosecution team, if you look at their history, if you look at what they did on

the Enron taskforce, that has a history of going after family members.

They apply extreme pressure in order to get people to flip.

And their track record is the best predictor of what they're doing right now.

We don't have much visibility into what they're doing. But he has assembled a team

of people who are used to putting extreme pressure on people's family members.

There's been reporting that his son has been involved in these conversations.

And I think that it was very telling that he included that line in his statement.

ROBERT COSTA: And if you look, Shawna, you're a veteran of Capitol Hill.

The response from both parties today was taking Robert Mueller seriously.

Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat from Virginia, ranking member on the Intelligence

Committee, says he's going to move forward, try to bring Jared Kushner, others to

testify. Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a Republican and close friend

of President Trump's, says: Mueller has a mandate. No one is above the law.

And you don't see the White House combatting Robert Mueller today either.

This is a legal team, a special counsel, that has a lot of capital.

SHAWNA THOMAS: It is. It absolutely is. And what I think the - what Capitol Hill

knows is that there is no point to getting in front of this. There is no point in

trying to push back on this. They - I believe the Senator Grahams, Republicans,

Senator Warners of the world want to work with Muller, want to not get in Mueller's

way, and want to solve this. And there is something political about this,

especially for someone like Senator Warner, when it comes to Democrats.

Maybe this will get at the president. Maybe this will be the smoking gun.

Maybe we'll get there. We could be years away from that. But I actually believe

there is something about preserving America and preserving democracy.

And that is somewhat a part of this for them. They want to know what happened.

ROBERT COSTA: It's a divisive issue, though, Alexis. When you think about President

Trump, he said throughout the campaign he wanted to have a different kind of

relationship with Russia. And there were a lot of Republicans today who were

trying to shrug this whole thing off, and say this is just the president being

the president. But I think that's the gray area everyone's trying to figure out here,

politically and legally. Where did the president and his team, perhaps, go wrong?

ALEXIS SIMENDINGER: One of the things that's fascinated me about this, between the

executive and the legislative, is how much the legislative branch, obviously controlled

by Republicans, has been willing to step up and say: We are a co-equal branch of the

government and we're worried about what's happening in the executive branch.

We're concerned about the White House, that maybe the president doesn't understand what

the repercussions of this is. We've seen reporting where senators are openly

talking about the president pressuring them: end this, end this investigation.

JONATHAN SWAN: That's amazing.

ALEXIS SIMENDINGER: Cut it off. We've seen bipartisan support for legislation

to put a nice fence around Robert Mueller and his team to make sure the president

doesn't fire him. There is concern on Capitol Hill, and maybe a misunderstanding

in part of the White House, about the Republican concern about Russia, right? Republicans -

ROBERT COSTA: They're hawks.

ALEXIS SIMENDINGER: They're hawks.

ROBERT COSTA: They're hawks when it comes to Russia.

ALEXIS SIMENDINGER: They are not in love with Vladimir Putin or Russia, and there is a

mystery on Capitol Hill about why is the president so enamored with President Putin?

SHAWNA THOMAS: And we also have to remember this is a Congress that literally passed

sanctions against Russia that the president of the United States didn't want.

Now the president of the United States and his people haven't really implemented those

sanctions yet, but they sent a warning shot across the bow a while ago being like -

ALEXIS SIMENDINGER: In August -

SHAWNA THOMAS: - you know, prove to us, one, that you are willing to sign this

legislation, and two, do something. They interfered in the election in the United States.

JONATHAN SWAN: There's a constant dance going on when you talk to senators and members -

a constant dance going on in their head. On one hand, they see things that deeply

concern them - every day almost - from this president. And on the other hand, they

know what the polling tells them which is that the president is still very popular

among Republican voters. His - I think the last time I looked at the approval

rating it was about 78 percent. Mitch McConnell's approval rating is about 23 percent.

They know the base is with Donald Trump, and if they turn against the president, the base

will turn on them. Congress has got approval rating, you know, rivaling some

epidemics, you know, so that is something in their heads.

ROBERT COSTA: A momentous day politically, legally, and we're going to keep an eye on

General Flynn and everything that happens with the special counsel, but let's remember

there was other late-breaking news on Friday night on Capitol Hill where Senate

Republicans are now set to pass a massive tax package. Nothing is certain until

the final votes are in, but what we do know is that that has been a messy, messy

process with many Senate leaders negotiating details behind closed doors.

Two of the key changes to the tax code are this: deductions for student loans and

medical care would be eliminated, and the individual health insurance mandate would be

repealed. When you think about the proposal, it would also slash the corporate rate

which the president argues would boost economic growth.

Democrats argue the plan benefits the wealthy and raises taxes on middle-income families.

Alexis, this bill seems to be moving along. It's late here on a Friday night.

ALEXIS SIMENDINGER: Lurching - lurching along. (Laughter.)

ROBERT COSTA: Lurching along is the better word. How did Mitch McConnell, and

perhaps President Trump, get these deficit hawks to come along?

ALEXIS SIMENDINGER: Well, it's a little bit like the deal-making that Mitch McConnell

disparaged during the health care debate during 2010, but it was trying to buy off votes

in his own conference based on principled concerns - I'm putting quote marks around

"principled concerns" - about specific provisions. So, for instance, if six different

senators in his conference had concerns, he listened carefully to those and adjusted

health care for Susan Collins and adjusted the passthroughs for Senator Johnson.

And in the end he managed to pull together the votes to bring it to the floor.

One of the things that I think is interesting is that the Republicans are rushing this

through in such a way that the senators we know are still trying to read what's in it,

even though this is hurtling now through to a final vote.

ROBERT COSTA: And there is a lot in it, Shawna, because when you look at this bill, it

is a massive tax package, but there is so much more in the legislation.

SHAWNA THOMAS: There is so much more, and really, the most recent version of the

legislation dropped, what, an hour or two before we are on this show - 500 pages.

But, you know, you mentioned, one, health care, so there's an individual mandate repeal

which brings in the entire health care conversation, and we've already had the CBO

basically say that maybe around 13 million people over the course of 10 years will end up

losing their health care because of taking away the individual mandate.

There are some people who say it is actually less, and they are over - they are

overthinking it, but - that's one thing.

We have now - drilling in the Alaskan National Wildlife Reserve is a part of this bill

which is something that Senator Murkowski wanted and has wanted for a long time, and it

does - it will raise some money, so I think that's why it's part of the bill, but also

it's something that she - and actually her father - have been fighting for forever.

You also have little things in this bill. There is a provision that allows unborn

children - it allows families to create basically college savings plans for their unborn

children, so they are trying to identify kids that are still in the womb as someone you

can have a savings plan for, which is not something you could do before, which can get

you into an entire debate about right - about life and abortion and everything like

that. There is - this bill, other than touching all of our pocketbooks -

ROBERT COSTA: And you have to do SALT and - have more deductions for state and local taxes.

SHAWNA THOMAS: Exactly.

ROBERT COSTA: They call them the SALT provision side of the bill. So they're

piecing everything together. And part of it is a political equation, Jonathan,

because this is a huge moment for the president.

JONATHAN SWAN: Right.

ROBERT COSTA: Yet, it comes the same day as the Michael Flynn plea agreement, and it has

been the unifying thread for his entire presidency with his own party.

JONATHAN SWAN: Imagine an alternative universe in which President Trump's inner circle

don't lie to the FBI and this tax package gets to the point - it's going to pass, by the

way. They've got the votes. It's going to pass. This is huge. It's a huge deal.

It's as you said in your introduction. This is a major, consequential achievement on the

signature issue for the Republican Party, and it is almost a footnote today in today's news.

ROBERT COSTA: Does it hold them together as a party?

JONATHAN SWAN: It's the one thing that they all kind of, in their own messy way, sort of

agree on with different levers. I actually think it's almost the only thing that they

now agree on in this party. There's basically nothing else.

We're going to probably get into some very messy trade conversations early next year, and

I'll tell you what, that ain't going to be clean at all.

ROBERT COSTA: We can talk about the health care. You could spend a whole discussion

on health care alone. What's the Republican political cost next year on health care

if they repeal the individual mandate?

ALEXIS SIMENDINGER: Well, it's not just health care, because when I've interviewed

Republicans, when my publication and my colleagues are interviewing, what's interesting

is that - and we've commented on this - no Democrats voted for this in the Senate.

They did not feel the pressure to do that. They understand that Republicans are going

to go out there alone and try to argue the fairness of every provision in this.

If you're trying to say this is fair for lower-income, who are going to lose their

insurance or their insurance gets more expensive because of that, then how is that fair?

If you find out that the average family is getting - I think the data is 80 percent of

families earning 50-75,000 (dollars) a year would get a modest - relatively modest tax

break of $850, if everything goes well. Is that fair? So they have to defend it.

ROBERT COSTA: They will have to defend it. It is quite intriguing that Democrats

who are in states President Trump won, they're not moving over.

They see the politics of this perhaps favorable in this direction.

We'll be following it all, but we're going to have to leave it there tonight, my friends.

And thanks, everybody, for joining us. And stay tuned for a special edition of

the Washington Week Extra. It's coming up next on many PBS stations.

We'll be talking about the sexual harassment spotlight on Capitol Hill, plus the final

lap in that Alabama Senate race, and what it means for the state and both parties.

Remember, you can also watch the Extra every week online Friday nights after 10 p.m.

at PBS.org/WashingtonWeek. I'm Robert Costa, and enjoy your weekend.

For more infomation >> Michael Flynn pleads guilty, Republicans move closer to overhauling the tax code - Duration: 21:49.

-------------------------------------------

Our President Just Scored Biggest Victory Of His Presidency—Democrats, Washington Rocked!!! - Duration: 3:08.

Our President Just Scored Biggest Victory Of His Presidency�Democrats, Washington

Rocked!!! Trump has promised to make America great again.

That has been met with plenty of opposition.

We may never know why there are people in Washington opposed to such a plan.

Yet there are both republicans and democrats who seemed determined to obstruct.

Despite their efforts, Trump continues to win.

This year has been marked with victories.

Even when liberals try to block his plans, Trump has come out the victor.

Now we are happy to announce a major victory is in the works.

Few could have foreseen this.

From Wall Street Journal: Senate Republicans on Friday were confident

that they had locked in enough votes to pass a sweeping tax bill later in the day.

Wavering GOP senators offered their support and a holdout, worried it would add to the

deficit, all but conceded defeat.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) said Friday morning, �We have the votes.�

His comment came after Sen. John Cornyn (R., Texas), the No. 2 Senate Republican, said

the party had 50 votes to pass the legislation.

Republicans control 52 seats compared with 48 for Democrats.

With no Democrats expected to support the bill and Vice President Mike Pence able to

break a tie if needed, Senate Republicans have the majority needed to clear the measure

through the Senate and open negotiations with the House to iron out differences�

Sens Pat Toomey (R., Pa.) said Friday, �We�ve got a great product and it�s going to pass

today.� Sen. Tim Scott (R., S.C.) was also optimistic, saying senators hoped to pass

the tax bill before they went home for the weekend.

Momentum for the tax legislation picked up on Friday morning after Republicans gained

support from Ron Johnson of Wisconsin and Steve Daines of Montana, helping the party

regroup after a late-evening stumble Thursday over concerns the bill would add to the budget

deficit.

This past week has seen more and more good news about this bill.

The tax bill is set to be a historic work of legislation.

All Americans will feel relief.

Bloated government spending will be reined in.

And the economy will soar.

Democrats will most likely not vote for this bill.

They will dig in their heels, as they always do.

Even though this is the thing they always promise voters, they will vote no.

So once again, it�s up to republicans in Congress to make it happen.

We were worried that too many republicans will buck the President and vote no.

But it seems more and more and coming around.

Even seeming NeverTrumpers have announced they will vote yes.

And hard-lining Constitutionalists will also vote yes.

It looks like this bill will get passed.

It will be a huge win for the MAGA crowd.

For more infomation >> Our President Just Scored Biggest Victory Of His Presidency—Democrats, Washington Rocked!!! - Duration: 3:08.

-------------------------------------------

The fallout of sexual harassment allegations on Capitol Hill - Duration: 21:51.

ROBERT COSTA: Tonight, on this special edition of the Washington Week Extra, embattled

Senate candidate Roy Moore vows to fight on, but how are Alabama voters responding?

Plus, the fallout of sexual harassment allegations on Capitol Hill.

I'm Robert Costa. All that, next.

ANNOUNCER: This is the Washington Week Extra.

Once again, from Washington, moderator Robert Costa.

ROBERT COSTA: Welcome to the Washington Week Extra. More than 500 miles from Capitol

Hill, voters in Alabama are less than two weeks away from picking a new senator.

It's just one race, but with a narrow Republican majority it will have significant impact

on President Trump's agenda. And it has become part of a national discussion of sexual

harassment and power in Congress.

Republican candidate Roy Moore, who has been accused by several women of inappropriate

sexual behavior, denies the allegations and spoke out this week.

ROY MOORE: (From video.) This is simply dirty politics, and it's a sign of the

immorality - (applause) - it's a sign of the immorality of our time.

ROBERT COSTA: To help explain this wild race, I'm joined by Michael Scherer from The

Washington Post newsroom. Michael, you've made three reporting trips to Alabama in the

last two months. And when you're on the ground there, what are voters saying in this

closing chapter? What do they make of Judge Moore and his defiance in this closing stretch?

MICHAEL SCHERER: It's really a divided electorate, and the most interesting segment of

it is the one that's really struggling with these allegations. A lot of people

find them very credible. They're Republican voters in a Republican state. They don't

want to send a Democrat to Washington. They are pro-life, Doug Jones is pro-choice.

And yet, they feel torn because they have these political interests and then - and then

they see the allegations, and they're trying to weigh these two different things.

And that's really what will decide this election down the stretch, you know, people who

maybe are not diehard Republicans, they're not diehard white Evangelical voters who

remain very much with Roy Moore, but are Republicans in the state who feel uneasy about

electing Moore and may vote against their own party.

ROBERT COSTA: We saw in the Virginia elections in November that the suburban voters are

the key voters. Is that the same situation down in Alabama? The people in the

suburbs of Birmingham and Mobile, are they the people who will sway this race?

MICHAEL SCHERER: And Huntsville as well. Yeah, I think they are, and I would add to

that women voters. You know, women voters have taken these allegations far more

seriously in polls than men, and they tend to be breaking off at a higher rate.

So I think that's the other group. You know, the other thing you have to look at is

the African-American turnout. A significant portion of Democratic voters in that state

are black. If they don't turn out for Doug Jones, that could decide this race as well.

And then the last target group to look at is whether there's a group of Republicans who

will never be able to vote for Jones because of his, you know, abortion views and other

views, but who choose to stay home; people, you know, Roy Moore otherwise would have

gotten to the polls who he just doesn't get to the polls because they're sitting out this

race because of the allegations.

ROBERT COSTA: You mentioned Huntsville. And if you think about Alabama right now in

2017, you have a business community there that's thriving. They're trying to bring big

business into the state. And it makes me wonder, how much of this race is about something

more than Roy Moore versus Doug Jones? Is it about the identity of Alabama as a state?

MICHAEL SCHERER: I think it is. You know, the biggest booming business in Alabama

right now is federal contracting. NASA has big plants down there. The Defense Department

does a lot of work down there. A lot of U.S. missiles are developed around the Huntsville

area. You know, this - there is a growing kind of cosmopolitan, metropolitan, corporate

workforce, highly educated, that would very much like to see Alabama escape its

reputation of the past. And Roy Moore is nothing if not a return to that, you know,

biblically orthodox version of, you know, states-rights, Alabama-pride past.

And so I think that's another thing that's being discussed here.

Doug Jones' campaign has very much run on this idea that Alabama can turn the page on its

own past, can go forward, you know, into the future with a - with a more gentle, more -

less combative approach to politics, to working with the rest of the country.

And that is one of the things that's on the ballot.

ROBERT COSTA: What about this battlefront in the Republican civil war? You have Steve

Bannon, the former White House chief strategist to President Trump. He'll be down there

next week for a rally with Judge Moore. And you have Mitch McConnell, the majority

leader; he's really wary of Judge Moore. And this seems to be the latest front of

that unending, it seems, battle between those forces in the Republican Party.

MICHAEL SCHERER: Yeah. And like many of these battles, it's a particularly ugly one.

You know, the other factor here is that President Trump now, we found out, is going to be

going down to hold a rally next week in Florida, but on the Panhandle, on the border with

Alabama, so he'll get coverage in Alabama without actually going to Alabama.

And the fact that he's sort of sided in the last couple weeks with Moore, not by

re-endorsing Moore but by saying we can't have a Democrat like Doug Jones in the Senate,

suggests that in that battle, where the party is very divided here, you know, the

president doesn't want to once again find himself on the wrong side of his own base, and

is taking a more cautious approach. I think if Moore wins this race and comes to

Washington, it is going to be fascinating to watch how he tangles with McConnell.

To this day, you know, Moore's biggest enemy on the - on the stump are not Democrats,

it's not, you know, the national media or, you know, Northerners generally, it's

specifically Mitch McConnell. That's the person he's running against as a Republican in

Alabama. And when he comes to the Senate, Mitch McConnell will be his number one enemy.

ROBERT COSTA: McConnell may be his number one enemy if he's elected, if Judge Moore wins

the seat. But explain to me this, Michael, because there's an interesting dynamic here.

You have McConnell. When I'm walking around the Capitol this week talking to Republican

senators, they're very skittish about Judge Moore. Then when you're down in Alabama,

Governor Kay Ivey, a Republican, she's sticking with Judge Moore. Alabama Republicans,

including establishment Republicans on the ground, are sticking with him. Why is that?

MICHAEL SCHERER: The only statewide elected Republican to break with - and the only

statewide elected official, because they're all Republicans in Alabama - to break with

Moore is Richard Shelby, the senior senator, and I think the reason is one of just job

protection. You have a Republican Party there where 25, 30 percent of the state - so

almost half the Republican base vote - is going to be with Roy Moore no matter what.

And if you want to get elected in Alabama, you know, whatever you think of this race and

whether Jones should win or Moore should win, you can't alienate Judge Moore's base.

And so someone like Kay Ivey, who's going to be up for reelection next year as governor,

doesn't want to position herself so that she has thrown the candidate of, you know, a

significant portion of her electorate under the bus, and it's put her in a very awkward

position. Her official position right now is I have no reason to doubt the accusers

against Roy Moore, and yet it's very important for us to have a Republican in the

Senate, and so I'm voting for Roy Moore. It's a very tricky argument to be making,

both to give credence to what are pretty horrific allegations against the judge and

on the other hand saying I'm going to be voting for the judge.

ROBERT COSTA: Where are the Democrats on all this? I was talking to Senator Joe

Manchin of West Virginia this week, a moderate Democrat from a Southern state, and he

said if I was Doug Jones I wouldn't want the national Democratic Party getting involved.

But there has to be some debate within Democratic ranks about that. Should they be

putting more money, more of an effort into picking up a Senate seat in the Deep South?

MICHAEL SCHERER: I think they are putting a lot of money in, and they're trying to do it

very quietly. Doug Jones has gotten a flood of money. He's outraising Roy Moore by

five to one, I think, over the last month. And there's an outside group called Highway

31, which was set up so - in a way where it's not going to disclose its donors until

after the election. They've spent $2 million already, which is a lot of money - it's

more than twice what Roy Moore has spent on his own race - in ads praising Jones and

attacking Moore. Those are big checks, probably, from probably national Democrats.

We don't know for sure. But they've structured it - the Democratic Party is very

sensitive to the idea that they don't want to be seen by Alabamians meddling in

Alabama politics, so they're trying to do it very quietly, and so they're doing

it through groups with very Alabama names like Highway 31.

ROBERT COSTA: Whatever happens on December 12th, you can be sure Democrats and

Republicans are going to do a lot of thinking about how this race played out, did they do

enough, did they do the right thing politically. Michael Scherer, I feel like you're

going to have a ZIP code soon in Alabama you've been down there so often.

Thank you so much for joining us.

MICHAEL SCHERER: Thank you, Bob.

ROBERT COSTA: Let's bring the conversation back to Washington where many of Roy Moore's

potential Republican colleagues in Congress have called on him to withdraw.

I'm joined around the table by Shawna Thomas of VICE News, Alexis Simendinger of The

Hill, and Jonathan Swan of Axios. Shawna, when you think about Doug Jones,

the Democrat, if he has any chance of winning in deep red Alabama, he's going

to have to get every Democratic coalition out to vote on December 12th.

SHAWNA THOMAS: Yeah, and he's going to have to get people out to vote who would normally

never vote in a special election in December, that a lot of people probably didn't

necessarily register to vote for. But the big coalition that he has to try to get to

show up, and that could, if they show up, swing the vote towards Doug Jones, is

African-Americans. There are enough registered African-American voters who primarily

do vote Democrat that he could take this race, especially since there are definitely

some suburban white voters who are not totally sure about the Roy Moore situation.

The thing is, what - one of my correspondents, Alex Jaffe, has spent a lot of time

in Alabama in the last couple of months. She's down there right now. They're seeing

African-American groups. They are seeing some African-American leadership in Alabama

sort of take the reins in trying to organize around Doug Jones. What they weren't

seeing until very recently was sort of a concerted effort from the Doug Jones

campaign to actually organize this themselves. And one of the people they've talked

to who's been trying to get at that vote has told them, you know, it's great that

Doug Jones shows up, you know, in Selma and marches on a bridge, but then doesn't

go to some of these other neighborhoods. And one told me one story about going to

a barber shop, a primarily black barber shop, down the street from Doug Jones'

campaign headquarters. And people there were, like, we don't know who

Doug Jones is. He has not come in here.

ROBERT COSTA: When you think about the White House and the dance they have to do

politically, Jonathan, the president says he's not going down to Alabama, but he will do

a rally next Friday night in Pensacola, Florida, about 50 miles away from Alabama. What

does that tell you, as a reporter, about how the White House is handling this whole race?

JONATHAN SWAN: Well, it's - they've had a very tough time, because the president has

been completely removed from the congressional leadership of his party and, frankly, a

lot of the people inside the White House. When the Roy - when the Roy Moore story

broke, the president - well, when it really broke, the president was in Asia.

And the staff - he was asleep, actually, when the really bad story hit. And the

staff were trying to figure out what to do. And they were trying to game out what

Trump's reaction was going to be. And most of them instinctively were correct, which

is that Trump saw a bit of himself in this situation, of his situation last year.

And his instinct was not to come out and condemn him.

But it's been mishandled, just it's eye-popping how mishandled it's been.

I mean, the head of the Republican National Committee calls the president and tells him

that she's going to pull all RNC resources and funding from this race. The president

gives his blessing to that. She does so. And then the White House comes out and

does a de facto endorsement a week later. It's been a complete mess.

ROBERT COSTA: And when you think about what's happening in Alabama, Alexis, these

allegations against Roy Moore are really just part of a broader discussion, a national

reckoning I'd say, about sexual harassment. And Congress, in particular, has been

rocked in recent weeks by claims against several high-profile members.

And it's important to point out that this is not a Republican or a Democratic issue.

This week Representative John Conyers of Michigan has faced new questions about

allegations made against him by a former staff member and a taxpayer-funded settlement.

Both Speaker Paul Ryan and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi have called on Conyers, the

longest-serving member of Congress, to resign. A spokesperson for Conyers said

Friday that the congressman will decide what to do in the next few days.

Where does Alabama fit into this national reckoning on sexual harassment?

ALEXIS SIMENDINGER: Well, you cannot imagine a situation in which the facts come in and

make things more complicated than anticipating that Judge Moore, who has obviously been

accused by multiple women, and including a woman who was a teenager, saying that he had

sexual - unwanted sexual contact with her - that he could be coming into the Senate at

the same time that Congress is also fighting off these stories in the Senate and the

House and trying to rally around this concept that this is not a partisan issue and that

Congress is going to improve its effort to be supportive of the victims of these kinds of

unwanted either contacts or actual harassment.

ROBERT COSTA: And that point about support, how they're going to support the victim, it

has vexed both parties, Shawna. You listen - Paul Ryan, the House speaker, is on NPR

on Friday. He's asked, what's the difference between Roy Moore's accusers and

President Trump's accusers? And he gives kind of a non-answer. Minority Leader Pelosi,

she's asked about John Conyers, she's asked about Al Franken. At first, she wavers a bit in her

answer. Now she's called on him to step down. Why is the leadership in both parties struggling?

SHAWNA THOMAS: I mean, I think this comes back to politics, basically, in that if you -

as Nancy Pelosi, say on Meet the Press, hey, I think - until you've sort of gamed things

out, especially with Congressman Conyers - hey, I think he should step down, and that

happens and you don't get any reciprocation from the Republican side when bad behavior

comes out about them, then are you - are you doing something that puts your party in

jeopardy, and therefore maybe puts your ability to maybe take back the House of

Representatives, maybe take back the Senate in jeopardy?

It's principle versus politics, and it's hard to deal with.

ALEXIS SIMENDINGER: And, to that point, the president's advisor, Kellyanne Conway, was

on TV saying: We need this vote. We need this vote. We need this Republican vote.

A woman, right? And that did not go down too well. On Capitol Hill, what's interesting

too is that lawmakers are not sure how many more of these cases are going to emerge.

And at The Hill we did an interview with Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy.

And his description of the way that the House should - leadership should respond is zero

tolerance. When we asked him, what is zero tolerance? You could tell that he was

backing away, because in Congress everyone has their own little company.

ROBERT COSTA: What about revealing who the settlements were about?

ALEXIS SIMENDINGER: Exactly. And they have not settled how they're going to do that.

And both the speaker and the majority leader say: Now, we have to be protective of the

victims. Not all the victims or the accusers want their identities to come out about

the settlement. But, remember, what we're talking about is taxpayer money.

They know they have to figure out something to deal with this.

JONATHAN SWAN: I mean, it is a scandal what's happening on Capitol Hill. It's like

something out of a 1940s gentleman's club. I mean, this whole system is basically set

up to protect the politician. Everything's done behind - you know, clandestine.

You know, it is - if you're an accuser - if you're a victim of sexual harassment on

Capitol Hill, you have to go through - it's barbaric, this process of appealing to this

person and that person and then - and then at the end of it we don't know what's

happened, the lawmaker gets - it's a protection racket for perpetrators. And it is the

last in this world where we're seeing colliding, you know, consequences across all

sorts of industries. It's the last bastion of no consequences, so far. We see the

private sector, people getting fired, losing their job. It is the last bastion of no

consequences. And that has to change.

SHAWNA THOMAS: And I think you pointed out, and you sort of said something similar, that

they're these own small businesses. This idea that every congressional office in some

ways makes its own rules, has its own reputation, has its own way of working.

And everything in those offices, and I talked to a lot of former staffers about this, and

a couple of current staffers. Everything is about protecting your member of Congress,

right? And so that is even bigger than just sexual harassment. That is harassment.

That is the way members of Congress sometimes treat their staff. And if you don't

protect your member of Congress and something happens, or you come out and speak

about something, they lose their job, then your whole office could lose their jobs.

And when you think about that, that creates a situation where everybody is scared to say

or do anything. But it also creates a situation where people can be

harassed and maybe not take any consequences for it.

ROBERT COSTA: About consequences, I want to come back to - you said you interviewed

Kevin McCarthy, the majority leader. And you think about, he wants to change the culture.

And there's now, thankfully, this idea that we're going to believe people when they speak

up, we encourage people to speak up. But what about the women who accused President

Trump last year? We're now in a different culture and environment in this country.

But what about them, the women - the more than a dozen who stepped forward last year?

ALEXIS SIMENDINGER: Well, Speaker Ryan was asked this question. And, you know, his

way of dealing with it is, I don't know about those cases. I can't compare Judge Moore

or the president to the - I'm just - we're just talking about Congress here.

And that's the way they back off on dealing with it.

ROBERT COSTA: You can't separate these allegations.

ALEXIS SIMENDINGER: But what's interesting is both the Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy

and the speaker are talking about accountability. The members themselves have to be

accountable. That is the dilemma, because we know President Trump has denied this.

At first, he was concerned about what the accusations were against Judge Moore.

And then he said: He's denied it.

And he acted like he believed that, right, and encouraged people to believe that, you

know, look, he's believing that Judge Moore is right about this, that maybe he's the victim.

JONATHAN SWAN: And let's just all remember that Judge Moore is accused of pedophilia

with a 14 - so, sexual - unwanted sexual activity with a 14-year-old; and yet, my sources

tell me, internal tracking on that campaign, he's up by five or six points, which matches

the public polls. He's probably going to win. He's probably going to take a seat in Congress.

ROBERT COSTA: Well, we'll see. (Laughter.) We'll see. The polls show him ahead.

JONATHAN SWAN: I'm just saying. I'm just saying.

ROBERT COSTA: The polls show him ahead.

JONATHAN SWAN: I'm just saying, if you take the current situation and the political

dynamics in Alabama, you would have to say that it is more likely than not that he wins,

I mean, just objectively based on the numbers currently. It's an amazing situation.

SHAWNA THOMAS: I mean, I think the one thing about President Trump that we have to

remember that is a little bit different than the Roy Moore situation, other than the

14-year-old and the unwanted sexual conduct, is that there is one of those women accusers

who currently has a pending case in district court in New York state. And that's Summer

Zervos, who's represented by Gloria Allred, and that case is a defamation case.

It is not trying to - there are no charges against President Trump for sexual assault or

sexual harassment. But because of that case, they may end up subpoenaing multiple

people. They may end up trying to get the president to speak about this itself. And so

there is that still working its way through the court system that we may see something.

ALEXIS SIMENDINGER: All I want to say is that, you know, everyone you talk to is saying

that this is not done, this is going to be continuing, and that there are going to be more

accounts of this. And we've seen that in other industries, and we're going to see that in politics.

SHAWNA THOMAS: And we've seen it in our own industry.

ROBERT COSTA: We've seen in its in our own industry, that is for sure. Every

institution, every industry is now having more accountability. You see it in the

media, people we know well; they are being held accountable. Politicians being held

accountable: Senator Franken, Congressman Conyers. These legends of politics, these

rising stars, all of them are being held accountable. The White House is pretty quiet.

JONATHAN SWAN: It's not a subject they want to talk about, for very obvious reasons,

which you alluded to before: the guy at the top.

ROBERT COSTA: We're going to have to leave it there. Thanks, everybody, for joining

us for this conversation. And thank you for watching the Washington Week Extra.

And a reminder: On the regular show, we talked about the plea deal Robert Mueller

reached with President Trump's former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, and the

debate over tax reform. If you missed that, you can find it Friday after 10 p.m.

and all weekend long on the Washington Week website. That's PBS.org/WashingtonWeek.

We'll be back next week with another expanded edition of the Washington Week Extra.

In the meantime, have a great weekend.

For more infomation >> The fallout of sexual harassment allegations on Capitol Hill - Duration: 21:51.

-------------------------------------------

Opinion | Flynn could have been charged with worse. That should worry Trump. - Duration: 2:33.

Michael Flynn has plead guilty to lying to the FBI in the Russia investigation.

Trump should be worried.

And you should be, too.

So, who is this guy?

President Trump's former national security advisor.

Fired for allegedly misleading the vice president.

And no fan of Hillary.

Lock her up!

Lock her up! That's right.

If I did a tenth, a tenth, of what she did, I would be in jail today.

Flynn could be locked up himself - but his best bet is cooperating with Robert Mueller's

investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 elections.

It looks like that's his plan.

See, Flynn could have been charged with any number of very bad things.

But Mueller, for now, has charged him with making false statements to the FBI.

That's an extremely minor count compared to the others.

And it indicates Flynn has probably reached a deal with Mueller, where he pleads guilty

to this one count in exchange for cooperating with the rest of the investigation.

This should be very concerning for Trump.

If Mueller thought Flynn's actions were the biggest crime to come out of the Russia

probe, he might have charged him with that and stopped.

But this charge - making false statements to the FBI - suggests Mueller is pursuing

someone higher, or something bigger, than Flynn.

The charges should also be concerning for you, because they have to do with national security.

They reach back to late December 2016, before Trump was sworn in.

Then-President Obama had just imposed sanctions on Russia for interfering in our election.

The same day, Flynn apparently asked Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak to not overreact

to the sanctions.

The implication might have been Trump was going to remove the sanctions once inaugurated.

When the FBI asked Flynn about this, he lied about it.

He also lied when he told authorities he didn't remember the ambassador saying Russia had

agreed to his request.

Separately, authorities say Flynn lied about asking the Russian ambassador to delay a vote

on a United Nations Security Council resolution.

So before Flynn had any authority to negotiate with the Russians, he was talking directly to them.

Working to undermine the Obama administration's effort to repudiate Russia for interfering

in our election.

Not only was Flynn undermining a sitting president but he was also undermining U.S. efforts to discourage

foreign interference in future elections, which Trump has yet to acknowledge.

The charges say Flynn was coordinating with two senior presidential transition officials.

Whether Trump knew this, and whether anything else happened in the campaign, are questions

the White House will have to answer.

For more infomation >> Opinion | Flynn could have been charged with worse. That should worry Trump. - Duration: 2:33.

-------------------------------------------

North Korea EXCLUSIVE: Military analyst reveals EXACTLY whether Kim can reach Washington - Duration: 9:12.

North Korea EXCLUSIVE: Military analyst reveals EXACTLY whether Kim can reach Washington

In an exclusive interview with Express.co.uk, CNN military analyst Cedric Leighton admitted that the hermit kingdom lacks the ability to strike the mainland US due to its struggles to "marry a small nuclear warhead with an ICBM missile".

He said: "The basic missile test that was conducted the other day is one that is very different because it clearly showed a missile that could go a lot further than any of the previous versions that the North Koreans had tested.

"It basically reached an altitude of almost 4,500 kilometres, that puts it at about 10 times higher than the orbit that the International Space Station is flying and really it's higher than many satellites would be flying, so it has some significant issues that are brought about by this.

"Even though North Korean seems to be saying that it did have a warhead on this particular missile, there is no other indication in terms of radiation, in terms of telemetry, or in terms of every other measure that we know about that they, in fact, did have a warhead on there.

"If the Hwasong-15 had a warhead on it that was nuclear capable, and one would have to assume that they would be miniaturising that warhead, that would obviously be a drag on the missile and its ability to fly, and the weight of something like that could adversely affect the range.

"So it could be a considerably shorter range that could potentially remove it from being able to threaten the United States directly.

"It may still affect outlying parts of the United States such as the territory of Guam or the state of Hawaii, but for the continental part of the United States, it may not pose as much of a threat as many people believe right now.

"Most assessments here in the US are that the North Koreans have not quite been able to marry the small nuclear warhead with the ICBM such as the Hwasong-15.".

Mr Leighton discussed the hypothesis from South Korea's minister of reunification who claimed that rapidly accelerating military programme from the rogue state could allow it to strike the mainland US by the "mid-part of 2018".

He added: "Many people give a lot of credence to the statements by the South Korean minister of reunification which basically said that the North Koreans would have that capability by the early part or the mid part of the coming year of 2018.

"So I think what we should do as prudent observers of this event is to think that the North Koreans are clearly working towards that goal, it is a publicly stated aim of theirs to actually have a missile that can threaten the United States with a legitimate nuclear warhead on it, and that kind of threat has to be taken seriously.".

Despite the seemingly imminent threat imposed on the world by despot leader Kim Jong-un, the military expert admitted that Pyongyang does not come close to the might of the US, China and the former Soviet Union.

He declared: "The North Koreans do not have the type of arsenal that the Soviet Union used to have or that the Chinese used to have, and they certainly can't compete with either of those countries in terms of their modern-day weaponry.

"They also cannot compete with the United States in terms of the quality and quantity of the nuclear weaponry.

"North Korea is basically already part of that nuclear club but the mechanisms that they exercise for their command and control of their nuclear weapons are not as robust and not as developed as those of other nations." After the rogue nation tested their most powerful missile yet, there were rumours that the test came as no surprise to South Korea that immediately retaliated with their own launch - Mr Leighton confirmed that Asian nations, as well as the US, had received reports of an impending provocation from the hermit kingdom.

He went on: "So a few days before the missile test there were reports that were primarily spoken about in Asia, especially in Japan, and a bit in South Korea that there were indications that the North Koreans were getting ready to conduct a missile test.

"Although this is something that would certainly remain classified within the United States government, it stands to reason that they also had an indication that this would happen.

"However they chose not to publicise that because in essence I think they did not want to egg on the North Koreans and they wanted to see if the intelligence was actually correct and sometimes with North Korea there are a lot of what I guess one could call false-positives when it comes to intelligence and it becomes a very challenging intelligence target.

"So in the United States at least we try to be very careful with how we assess intelligence pertaining to North Korea.

"So I'm certain that policy makers here in the US were aware that the North Korean's were probably planning to do something.

"There were a lot of questions in the run up to this latest missile test as to why there had been such a long period of time between the previous missile test and the one that just happened.

"Based on North Korean statements and general North Korean behaviour, I think most people including myself, looked at this as not an indication as a willingness of the North Korean's to talk, but instead a timeframe in which the North Korean's could better prepare themselves for these tests and conduct a more successful test than they otherwise would have been able to do.".

After the sixth missile test from the hermit kingdom, Japan not only threatened to shoot down further missiles that prime minister Shinzo Abe believed posed a danger to Japan, but his aggressive rhetoric against Kim Jong-un appeared to have shifted another gear after his meeting with Donald Trump - the military analyst believes Mr Abe's threats could account for this week's missile trajectory.

Mr Leighton stated: "I think it's a very likely scenario that prime minister Abe's rhetoric in relation to North Korea have been a factor in not only the way in which North Korea launched the missile but also the way in which they timed that launch.

"I think the way in which the Japanese are reacting to North Korea provocations makes it very clear that they were intent on shooting down the next missile that flew over their territory.

"So the North Korean's, I think wisely, decided to demonstrate their capability but to do it in such a way that would keep the missile from flying over Japanese territory.

"According to the Japanese they violated their exclusive economic zone, but that's not the same from an international law standpoint as either violating either the territorial waters of a country or the actual landmass of a country.

"So in this case the North Korean's kind of went up to the edge to let it be known that they have the capability without actually making a supreme provocation such as a direct overflight of the country of Japan.".

For more infomation >> North Korea EXCLUSIVE: Military analyst reveals EXACTLY whether Kim can reach Washington - Duration: 9:12.

-------------------------------------------

Washington Stunned As Trump's Former National Security Adviser Admits To Lying To FBI - Duration: 3:01.

For more infomation >> Washington Stunned As Trump's Former National Security Adviser Admits To Lying To FBI - Duration: 3:01.

-------------------------------------------

The Zero Milestone, Washington - Duration: 2:52.

For more infomation >> The Zero Milestone, Washington - Duration: 2:52.

-------------------------------------------

Female spy saves George Washington's life - 12/2/1777 - Duration: 1:15.

Today in Military History, 1776.

General George Washington arrives

at the banks of the Delaware River.

By mid November, Washington's Continental Army

had been pushed out of New York

by British General William Howe,

who then ordered forces under General Cornwallis

to drive Washington across New Jersey.

With attrition and morale low,

Washington's army was in bad shape

by the time he reached the Delaware.

After transporting his forces

across the river to Pennsylvania,

Washington also made a decision

that gave him a major tactical advantage.

He confiscated, or burned, every boat along the river

to prevent the British pursuit.

Content to end the campaign season

and take up winter quarters,

the British withdrew to prepare for the Spring.

Washington however, took the next three weeks

to plan a bold attack.

On the evening of December 25th,

he famously crossed the Delaware yet again,

this time to launch a surprise attack

against Hessian forces quartered in Trenton, New Jersey.

On the morning of December 26th,

Washington managed to overwhelm

the unsuspecting Hessians, and take the town.

While he wouldn't hold it for long,

his victory nonetheless raised the spirits

of the American Revolutionaries,

and paved the way for Independence.

For more infomation >> Female spy saves George Washington's life - 12/2/1777 - Duration: 1:15.

-------------------------------------------

841 Decatur NW Street, Washington - Presented by RJ Soni of the Creig Northrop Team - Duration: 1:19.

For more infomation >> 841 Decatur NW Street, Washington - Presented by RJ Soni of the Creig Northrop Team - Duration: 1:19.

-------------------------------------------

Travels With Charlie: Oliver Twist at Washington High Academy - Duration: 1:53.

WHAT WOULD

CHRISTMAS BE LIKE

WITHOUT EBENEZER

SCROOGE AND TINY

TIM, OR THE AUTHOR

CHARLES DICKENS

WHO BROUGHT THOSE

CHARACTERS TO LIFE?

DICKENS' OTHER

FAMOUS STREET

URCHIN, OLIVER

TWIST, WILL BE LIVE

AND ON-STAGE IN

PRINCESS ANNE OVER

THE NEXT FEW

WEEKS.

CHARLIE HAS A

PREVIEW IN TONIGHT'S

TRAVELS.

LITTLE GIRL: YOU KNOW HOW

EVERYONE SAYS "BE YOURSELF" ? IN

THE THEATER BIZ... YOU DON'T DO

THAT.

NATSOUND FROM STAGE

:

OLIVER: BUT I'M AN

ORPHAN!

NANCY: OH! HEAVENS!

JUST LISTEN TO HIM!

CP

DO YOU ALL KNOW

EACH OTHER?

BOY

YEAH. WE'RE LIKE

FAMILY.

NATSOUND DIRECTOR

WE'RE TRAVELING

TOO LONG...

CP: THAT "FAMILY"

INCLUDES COUNTLESS

STAGE PRODUCTIONS

SINCE OLIVER FIRST

OPENED IN 1960, AND

SCORES OF FILMS

BEFORE THAT... ALL

BASED ON CHARLES

DICKENS CLASSIC

NOVEL OLIVER TWIST,

NOW ONE HUNDRED

AND EIGHTY YEARS

YOUNG.

NATSOUND

STAGE DIALOGUE.

CP: IT'S A STORY

THAT'S TOUCHED

AUDIENCES FOR A

LONG TIME.

NATSOUND

OLIVER GETS

SMACKED DOWN

CP

IN A WAY, THESE

ACTORS GATHER FOR

THE SAME REASONS

THOSE STREET

URCHINS DID IN

LONDON ALL THOSE

YEARS AGO.

CP: NONE OF YOU ARE

STREET URCHINS IN

REAL LIFE.

KIDS: NO!

CP: HAVE YOU

LEARNED SOMETHING

ABOUT THE LIVES OF

POOR STREET

URCHINS A LONG TIME

AGO?

KIDS: YES!

GIRL: I LEARNED THEY

WERE NOT TREATED

AS WELL AS OTHER

KIDS.

BOY: THEY WERE

SORT OF LOOKED

DOWN UPON BY THE

RICHEST, BY THE

HIGHER CLASS

PEOPLE.

NATSOUND

STAGE DIALOGUE

CP: THERE ARE

SEVERAL

PERFORMANCES OVER

THE NEXT TWO WEEKS

AT WASHINGTON HIGH

ACADEMY IN PRINCESS

ANNE. HOPE TO SEE

YOU AT ONE OF THE

SHOWS.

IN SOMERSET

COUNTY, CP WBOC.

THERE ARE SIX

PERFORMANCES OVER

THE NEXT TWO

WEEKENDS TO GET

YOU IN THE

CHRISTMAS SPIRIT!

WE'LL BE RIGHT BACK.

TONIGHT: CLEAR. LOWS: 28-35.

WINDS:

E 5-10 MPH.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét