Beautiful A Waterfront Cabin (528 Sq. Ft.) In Langley, Washington | Great Small House Design
For more infomation >> Washington, Having FUBARed Marijuana, FUBARs Industrial Hemp - Duration: 45:31. 
For more infomation >> Washington DC Travel Tips: 10 Things to Know Before You Go to DC - Duration: 20:01. 
For more infomation >> Financials are spinning out of control in Washington: David Walker - Duration: 7:45. 
For more infomation >> Departamento de Seguridad contempla medidas en la frontera dirigidas a familias: The Washington Post - Duration: 2:15. 
Washington Post busted for pushing totally FAKE NEWS about �seven words banned� in
CDC budget documents
by: JD Heyes
You�ve got to hand it to the unhinged establishment media.
They take it on the chin time and time again for publishing fake news about President Donald
J. Trump and his administration. But they continue to allow themselves to be played,
even as the last shards of their credibility fade away because they are so wedded to their
Alt-Left ideology and Trump hate.
That�s loyalty to a cause, no matter how stupid and idiotic it is, considering that
without credibility, eventually, they won�t have much of an audience.
The Washington Post is the latest outlet to get burned ginning up phony allegations against
the Trump administration � a dishonor the paper is actually committing fairly routinely
in the Age of Trump.
Late last week WaPo published a story claiming that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
was being prevented by the Trump administration from using seven words and phrases � allegedly
including �fetus� and �transgender� � because, you know, the Trump administration
is full of Russian-controlled homophobes and haters. (Related: How the Washington Post
lost its Pulitzer Prize by faking the news.)
The paper noted further:
Policy analysts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta were told
of the list of forbidden words at a meeting Thursday with senior CDC officials who oversee
the budget, according to an analyst who took part in the 90-minute briefing. The forbidden
words are �vulnerable,� �entitlement,� �diversity,� �transgender,� �fetus,�
�evidence-based� and �science-based.�
In some instances, the analysts were given alternative phrases. Instead of �science-based�
or ��evidence-based,� the suggested phrase is �CDC bases its recommendations
on science in consideration with community standards and wishes,� the person said.
In other cases, no replacement words were immediately offered.
After making its blanket claims, the story then attempts to muddy the waters a bit by
stating that some terms supposedly prohibited in draft budget documents �had been conveyed
verbally� in a meeting among career officials at the CDC � hard to verify. Still, the
principal claim is that the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees
the CDC, wants the terms banned.
The only problem with this is that it didn�t happen � at least, not in the context of
the Post�s story (Trump sucks, he�s a bigot, his people suck and are bigots, etc.).
As explained by National Review�s Yuval Levin:
What seems to have happened here involves two sets of circumstances. First, the budget
office at HHS sent the various divisions of the department a style guide to use in their
budget-proposal language and �congressional justification� documents for the coming
year. That style guide, which sets out a standard style for everything from capitalization of
the titles of key offices to some commonly disputed points of grammar and punctuation,
also sets out some words to be avoided. These, I am told, are avoided because they are frequently
misused or regularly overused in departmental documents (make of that what you will) and
they include three terms on the Post�s list: �vulnerable,� �diversity,� and �entitlement.�
The style guide does not prohibit the use of these terms, but it says they should be
used only when alternatives (which it proposes in some cases) cannot be.
He says further that he doesn�t remember using a style guide when he worked at HHS
and the White House during the Bush years, but one person he spoke with suggested there
was one in the Obama administration.
A more viable explanation for some of the more inflammatory words is �not that retrograde
Republicans ordered career CDC officials not to use these terms but that career CDC officials
assumed retrograde Republicans would be triggered by such words and, in an effort to avoid having
such Republicans cut their budgets, reasoned they might be best avoided,� Levin added.
And if you don�t believe him, perhaps you�ll believe the director of the CDC, who tweeted
there are �no banned words� at her agency.
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét