Thứ Năm, 28 tháng 12, 2017

News on Youtube Dec 28 2017

Does this supplement have HARMFUL carbs maybe even the most DANGEROUS carbs? It's

on the shelves right now and you might even be using it! I'll show you how I

came to this conclusion based on my own research involving some of the most

catabolic people we've ever had on the planet -I offer that without exaggeration.

So we'll break it all down -you're going to be the local expert. You might be able

to help somebody that you know is using this product! So we've got a lot to get to,

let's jump right in! [INTRODUCTION: Science Application Experience] I'm David Barr [CSCS, NSCACPT, TSAC-F, CISSN, RSCC] and if you're looking to get bigger faster

stronger, get leaner, go longer, hit that Subscribe, and then the little bell so

you don't miss any important updates. And I'm going to 1-UP it, because if you

think that objective evidence is a better way to gather information than

"special feelings", [Objective Evidence + Reason vs. Emotion] then be sure to help advance the conversation and Share this

video. So what are we talking about? To really understand the details, you need

to be the local expert. [YOU = Local Expert] This is going to take a minute, so hang in there -there's

learning and it's worth it. So if you've ever had blood sugar taken

aka "fasting serum glucose" that's really just taking [or measuring] the amount of sugar in your blood.

"Blood sugar", "glucose", "dextrose"; it's all the same thing, okay? [Glucose = Dextrose, "Blood Sugar" = Serum Glucose] And all

carbohydrates that we consume are broken down to this blood sugar, ultimately

stored as glycogen in muscle. But [now] we're all on the same page when we talk about

glucose or blood glucose. Okay we'll talk about glucose specifically

right now, because it doesn't have to be digested, it can just be absorbed. [NOTE:All graphs, equations, etc. are simplified for educational purposes] So

we'll make things a little simpler [by starting with glucose ingestion]. You may have even done this, when taking

finger pricks to see what your blood glucose levels are, and if you did this

when your fasted, they're going to be relatively low. Once you consume say 50

grams of glucose, you're going to notice over time that your blood

glucose levels start to go up. Why? Because it's being absorbed from your gut, going

into your blood. [x-axis (y=0) shows Healthy Fasting Glucose level] Now it keeps going up for a while, and then it starts come down. Why

is that? Well it's because it's [the blood glucose] being absorbed, or

taken up into muscle. It's being transported into your muscle, mostly. All

cells need glucose, but our muscle is the biggest sink, especially if you lift. [Blood Sugar, Standard Curve] So

this is a standard curve that we see. Now if we were to take in fewer than 50

grams [of glucose] we would see a very similar curve, but it would be a lot lower. [25 grams Glucose versus 50 grams Glucose] Why? because

we're not consuming as many carbs -we're not consuming as much of glucose. Now

what if we consumed one hundred grams of carbs? Twice our initial dose. Well, you're

going to see a much higher rise, and slightly longer duration in that curve. [100 grams Glucose versus 50 grams Glucose]

Why? Because the area reflects the amount of carbohydrates that we consume,

especially when we're just talking glucose right now, okay? So we have the

lower dose, 25 grams that's going to be a smaller rise in glucose, the bump isn't

going to be as high. 50 grams is more, it's going to be higher, right? [100 grams Glucose versus 50 grams Glucose versus 25 grams Glucose, Area Under the Curve] So you see

how this progresses -the more we consume, the higher it is. Now what if we were to

consume say 50 grams of a slow absorbing carbohydrate, like a waxy maize starch?

[50 grams Slow versus 50 grams Glucose] Then we would see a much longer curve, but it's not going to go up quite as

high. Why? Because it's more of a trickle effect. It's more of a SLOW absorption

into the blood, but then that area is going to be roughly the same. That "Area

Under [the] Curve", showing that yeah it's about 50 grams of carbohydrate. Well if

we consumed a "magical faster than glucose" carbohydrate? 50 grams. Well you're

going to have a higher spike [in blood sugar], but it's going to come down much more quickly. [50 grams Fast versus 50 grams Glucose]

Again, the net area is going to be about roughly the same, because it's going to

be 50 grams [of carbohydrates ingested], so again that net area is going to reflect the total amount. Now

this is where it gets interesting, because of it

this is where it comes back to the research on catabolic patients,

irrespective of their growth hormone use, they were using a lot of substances to

keep them as healthy as possible, and keep them alive. And what we saw was that

they had something called insulin resistance. [Insulin Resistance may be transient, or a prelude to the disease called Type 2 Diabetes] Now a curve showing

insulin resistance -and people have this type of test you might know it is an OGTT,

[Oral Glucose Tolerance Test] a really important test, especially for people who are suspected having type 2

diabetes -very very important for them to get this type of test, and the curve

would look like this. They would have an initial rise in that blood glucose let's

go back to 50 grams of glucose that they're consuming, [Insulin Resistant versus Healthy] they would have that

initial rise in blood glucose, but it stays up. And it stays up, and it stays

elevated for longer. Why is that? Well they have problems getting the sugar

into their cells, especially into their muscle cells. [Blood glucose level = Glucose entering the blood (from the gut) - glucose leaving blood (into muscle)] Okay? So remember that the

curve is not only just based on the amount that's coming INTO the blood,

it's also about how much is LEAVING the blood. And that's the trick! That's a flaw

was something called the Glycemic Index. I'll cover that in another video in the

future, but right now no the people within type-2 diabetes or insulin

resistance, aren't taking up the glucose as well as healthy people like you or I. [Insulin resistance = SAME Glucose entering blood (from gut) - LESS Glucose Leaving Blood (into muscle)]

So what we're seeing ultimately is that this curve, this glucose curve, even

though they're taking in the same amount of glucose that you and I are, they're

having an extended curve. It looks much higher it actually looks like they're

consuming much more carbohydrate, because they can't get it into their cells. They

can get into the blood, but they can't get it OUT of the blood very easily. So

this is where there's a problem with the supplement. Now this supplement actually

claims us on their label. I don't know if they still do actually, when I had this

ingredient, this supplement, they actually showed this curve, this blood

glucose curve, and what they showed was they had a slightly faster rise in blood

glucose compared to glucose -the SAME AMOUNT of glucose. Okay? [50 grams of the carbohydrate supplement versus 50 grams Glucose] They had a slightly

faster rise and then a longer release -a longer curve. Now if they are consuming

the same amount of carbohydrate as the glucose, what does this curve look like?

If they're consuming the same quantity of carbs, what does this curve look like?

What did we just see? [Remember: Glucose can only work if it gets INTO your cells] Well it looks like the type two diabetic curve. It looks like the

insulin resistance curve. So this is where we get into the possibility that

these carbs in this supplement are not only potentially harmful carbs, [This apparent Insulin Resistance may be transient or potentially more serious] but maybe

even the most dangerous carbs, if they are somehow inducing insulin resistance.

[Either way, this effect may imp[air your performance and or body composition] Now their claim is that they have different types of carbs, with slower

release and faster release, so you combine them and then you get this "magic

curve", but we wouldn't see that, right? Remember going back to the total Area

Under that Curve? [This is what we would expect to see with a Fast + Slow carbohydrate blend]That's going to reflect the amount of carbohydrate consumed. So

we're not seeing that with this carb. They're showing us that they are somehow

inducing insulin resistance, because if the carbohydrate had fast and slow

release and it was the same amount, and wasn't inducing insulin resistance, [25 grams Fast carbohydrate PLUS 25 grams Slow, carbohydrate blend] the

curve would be lower, right? Just like we saw with the different speeds of

absorption like that waxy maize starch, the net Area Under the Curve reflects [CONTRAST: Company claim versus what we SHOULD roughly see]

the amount of carbohydrate consumed, except for in disease states, okay? And

this is again where we see this type of curve, is in the most catabolic people

that I've ever seen, [NOTE the rough Area Under the Curve for the Supplement versus our theoretical blend] as well as people with type 2 diabetes and insulin

resistance. So is this carbohydrate causing insulin resistance? And if so, we

need to know! The company needs to explain this! Now the problem with this,

this is a potentially litigious situation because I'm the first person

to report on this, and I don't want to get sued, [I found this while working for a carbohydrate supplement company] so I can't actually mention the

name of the company. So I encourage you do your due diligence. If you are looking

at carbohydrate product, look at their curve. [I no longer work for that company and have NO conflict of interest] If you see this curve that's

higher than the same amount of glucose, call the company, see what's going on, [I am just not smart enough to make money off of supplements]

have them explain it. Now someone suggested to me maybe the company wasn't

as "high fidelity" in terms of their research, maybe they thought this would

be a good marketing idea to show this. So maybe it's not a real curve.

To me that would actually be the best situation because if not, again, they are

causing insulin resistance, at least they appear to be. So again, we don't want

these potentially harmful carbs or even the most dangerous carbs in our body, so

do your due diligence make sure you know what you're putting in your body. Hold

companies accountable for what they're doing and the claims they make. Now when

reviewing an ingredient or supplement, I usually have a three-point checklist

that you can use to decide whether or not you want to use a product. In this case

I'm not going to do that. I mean, not only is it potentially harmful, as indicated

by the company themselves, there's no peer-reviewed published

research on it, OF COURSE. [No "Proof on PubMed"] I mean if there were, it would probably be showing that

it's potentially harmful. So this is not one of those things I'm going to review,

in that way. It's just one of those things -find out what's going on, find out

why we can't get the carbohydrates that we ingest ["into our muscle"] when we consume

the supplement. Now let's be clear, if you're pissed off about this, and you

probably should be, you have every right to contact the company and let them know

how you feel. You're not powerless. In fact, you hold all the power. I've done

this before -reported on potentially dangerous ingredient and the company changed

their formulation. But it wasn't just because of me, it was because of the

RESPONSE. [Glycocyamine aka Creatoxin] The consumer has the power. Let the company know how you feel. It's only

by your action that things are going to change, so consider this to be your call

to action: let the company know! So if you found this information helpful, Share it

with someone, they just might owe you a protein shake. I'm David Barr and until

next time Raise The Barr

For more infomation >> Are You Using These HARMFUL Carbs, the Most DANGEROUS Carbs: Public WARNING - Duration: 9:57.

-------------------------------------------

(Spanish Version) SRPD Seeks the Public's Assistance: Stabbing at Lola's Market #17-16826 - Duration: 1:54.

For more infomation >> (Spanish Version) SRPD Seeks the Public's Assistance: Stabbing at Lola's Market #17-16826 - Duration: 1:54.

-------------------------------------------

WORKING OUT IN PUBLIC - Duration: 6:01.

Did you fall?

No. Do you wanna try it with me?

I was just doing a forward roll

"Do you see that?

Come on man gotta get some pushups in

"Nah i would have a heart attack"

For more infomation >> WORKING OUT IN PUBLIC - Duration: 6:01.

-------------------------------------------

SRPD Seeks the Public's Assistance: Stabbing at Lola's Market #17-16826 - Duration: 1:36.

Hello, my name is Hector DeLeon.

I'm a detective with Santa Rosa Police Department.

The Santa Rosa Police is seeking the public's help in identifying and locating the suspect

of a stabbing.

The stabbing occurred on December 21st at the Lola's on Dutton Ave. in Santa Rosa at

approximately 6:30pm.

At that time, a 61 year old male was sitting alone, having dinner when he was approached

by the suspect that you see here and the suspect stabbed the victim in the neck.

He then fled the area and has not been identified yet.

The suspect was described as a Hispanic male adult in his 30's to 40's, approximately 5'6"

tall, and approximately 160 to 180 lbs.

He had close-cut, black hair and was wearing a distinct, puffy, dark green jacket.

Also, witnesses describe the suspect having a tattoo similar to the one you see here.

It's described as being a tattoo of the "Grim Reaper" or commonly known as the "Santa Muerte"

in Spanish.

If you have any information, please contact the Santa Rosa Police Department, Violent

Crimes Team at 543-3590.

If you have any information leading to the arrest and conviction of the suspect the Sonoma

County Alliance is offering a $2,500 reward for that information.

And that number again, if you have any information is 543-3590.

Thank you for your assistance.

For more infomation >> SRPD Seeks the Public's Assistance: Stabbing at Lola's Market #17-16826 - Duration: 1:36.

-------------------------------------------

Provocative Painting In A Public Space - Duration: 1:45.

For more infomation >> Provocative Painting In A Public Space - Duration: 1:45.

-------------------------------------------

Did Meghan Markle Steal Kate Middleton's Style For Her First Public Outing With The Queen? - Duration: 2:53.

For more infomation >> Did Meghan Markle Steal Kate Middleton's Style For Her First Public Outing With The Queen? - Duration: 2:53.

-------------------------------------------

PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT! - Duration: 9:15.

What the fuck man?

For more infomation >> PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT! - Duration: 9:15.

-------------------------------------------

Holly Hagan SLAMS Stephen Bear's public declaration of love to Charlotte Crosby - Duration: 2:37.

Holly Hagan SLAMS Stephen Bear's public declaration of love to Charlotte Crosby

Geordie Shore's Holly Hagan certainly wasn't buying Bear's public apology to her former co-star Charlotte. On Friday night Bear, 28, took to Instagram to beg for the forgiveness of his former girlfriend, 27, with a very public apology.

He wrote: "Dear Charlotte, I really messed up, if I could rewind the clock back maybe I wouldn't have done the things I did and say.

"Life's about making mistakes. I've just been really sad recently and need to get it off my chest.

"I know being with me isn't easy and I will probably send you insane in the end and I really do care and still love you. It might be too late, but all I can do is try.

"The New Year's coming up and I would love to spend the rest of my life with you. I've done my best and put it out there.

"I don't show my feelings often so it will be a very long time before you see me open up again.

I would WhatsApp you, but you've changed your number [sic], would be nice [for you] to slide in my DM though if you see this." However it seemed Bear's attempt wasn't successful as he later posted a snap on his Instagram story which simply stated: "It was a no." And now keen to have her bestie's back, Holly has further dug the boot in by sharing her thoughts on the gushing post.

Holly, 25, commented: "Stephen, you know what you've put this girl through, you forced your way back into her life last time and if I'm honest, I admired your persistence which is why I thought you'd have grown up and been on your knees begging for that girl's forgiveness every day.

"Instead, I watched you take her back to the very place she was when she was hurt the first time but now it's twice as hard because she didn't even wanna let you back in – she was doing great.

"I cannot let you do it a third time, if you have any love for that girl whatsoever you'll let her go." Ouch! Looks like Bear won't be expecting a Christmas card off Holly or Charlotte!.

For more infomation >> Holly Hagan SLAMS Stephen Bear's public declaration of love to Charlotte Crosby - Duration: 2:37.

-------------------------------------------

Holly Hagan SLAMS Stephen Bear's public declaration of love to Charlotte Crosby - Duration: 2:47.

Holly Hagan SLAMS Stephen Bear's public declaration of love to Charlotte Crosby

Geordie Shore's Holly Hagan certainly wasn't buying Bear's public apology to her former co-star Charlotte. On Friday night Bear, 28, took to Instagram to beg for the forgiveness of his former girlfriend, 27, with a very public apology.

He wrote: "Dear Charlotte, I really messed up, if I could rewind the clock back maybe I wouldn't have done the things I did and say.

"Life's about making mistakes. I've just been really sad recently and need to get it off my chest.

"I know being with me isn't easy and I will probably send you insane in the end and I really do care and still love you. It might be too late, but all I can do is try.

"The New Year's coming up and I would love to spend the rest of my life with you. I've done my best and put it out there.

"I don't show my feelings often so it will be a very long time before you see me open up again.

I would WhatsApp you, but you've changed your number [sic], would be nice [for you] to slide in my DM though if you see this." However it seemed Bear's attempt wasn't successful as he later posted a snap on his Instagram story which simply stated: "It was a no." And now keen to have her bestie's back, Holly has further dug the boot in by sharing her thoughts on the gushing post.

Holly, 25, commented: "Stephen, you know what you've put this girl through, you forced your way back into her life last time and if I'm honest, I admired your persistence which is why I thought you'd have grown up and been on your knees begging for that girl's forgiveness every day.

"Instead, I watched you take her back to the very place she was when she was hurt the first time but now it's twice as hard because she didn't even wanna let you back in – she was doing great.

"I cannot let you do it a third time, if you have any love for that girl whatsoever you'll let her go." Ouch! Looks like Bear won't be expecting a Christmas card off Holly or Charlotte!.

For more infomation >> Holly Hagan SLAMS Stephen Bear's public declaration of love to Charlotte Crosby - Duration: 2:47.

-------------------------------------------

City of Abbeville asking for public's help in fighting crime - Duration: 2:09.

For more infomation >> City of Abbeville asking for public's help in fighting crime - Duration: 2:09.

-------------------------------------------

FWP hosting public meetings in Northwest Montana - Duration: 1:23.

For more infomation >> FWP hosting public meetings in Northwest Montana - Duration: 1:23.

-------------------------------------------

Public (Bad) Buzz : Lewis Hamilton créait la polémique en se moquant de son petit neveu habillée - Duration: 2:32.

For more infomation >> Public (Bad) Buzz : Lewis Hamilton créait la polémique en se moquant de son petit neveu habillée - Duration: 2:32.

-------------------------------------------

Tick-Borne Disease Working Group Meeting 1 pt 3 - Public Comment and Meeting 2 Preview - Duration: 54:11.

>> Dazon Dixon Dialo: As you come to the mike, I want to remind you that this is a listening

session for everyone in the room, so, it's your time, it's your three minutes.

Stand in your truth, say what you have to say, say how you need to say it.

But, perhaps you want to hold the others, if it's about something, or someone, or some

entity.

We're all people, we're all human, and we all have our frailties.

So, when you say what you have to say, try holding my heart in your hand while you say

it.

I promise you, you'll be a little more conscientious of what you have to say feels like.

Are we together?

All right, let's call Colonel Nicole Malachowski to the microphone for her time.

>> Nicole Malachowski: Is this thing on?

>> Dazon Dixon Dialo: It's not on.

>> Nicole Malachowski: It's on now?

Great.

Good afternoon, and thank you for the privilege to provide comment.

My name is Nicole Malachowski, I'm an active duty colonel in the United States Air Force.

I am here in my personal capacity, as a patient advocate, my comments are not intended to

represent the Department of the Defense, or the air force.

I've served over 21 years as an officer, and a career fighter-pilot.

In 18 days, I will be permanently, medically, retired from the career I love.

I was found unfit for duty, due to the damage, and ongoing effects, of neurological tick-borne

illness.

My illness began in 2012 when, as the commander of an F-15E Fighter Squadron, I began experiencing

rapid onset of multi-systemic symptoms.

Repeated doctor visits yield no answers, no diagnosis, no treatment, nothing.

Just over a year ago, I suffered from intractable pain, insurmountable fatigue, cognitive disfunction,

and major problems with my speech, and short-term memory.

I endured disorientation, confusion, anxiety, and even moments of temporary paralysis.

I was unsafe to be left alone, I could not play with my children, care for myself, or

interact with my husband, who had to be both caregiver, and single parent, during the worst

of my illness.

There were times I would have welcomed death.

I thought I was tough, as a combat-proven fighter pilot.

But, tick-borne illness destroyed me, brought me to my knees, and ruthlessly broke me.

It would be 1,525 days between my first doctors visit, and my accurate diagnosis.

Often, I was told I was just suffering from stress.

I felt patronized, discounted, and dismissed.

I saw over 20 doctors, military and civilian alike, across eight specialties, and received

three misdiagnoses.

By sheer luck, I was finally able to be seen at the Dean Center for Tick Borne Illness

in Boston, Massachusetts.

They are the only reason I am here today, the reason I am able to, once again, stand,

read, and speak.

Since my diagnosis, I have reviewed my own medical record many times, and I'm profoundly

troubled that other service members, military family members, and veterans, may be enduring

similar, unnecessary suffering.

I am deeply concerned about the impact of these tick-borne diseases on our military.

We are a high-risk population for encountering countless diseases, and I would like to add

special emphasis on Borrelia, and Bartonella.

The tax payers of America invested tens of millions of dollars in my training.

They are not getting the return on investment they should have.

This is a health of the force issue, this is a military readiness issue, and this is

a national security issue.

My doctors, civilian and military alike, were woefully uneducated about the breadth of tick-borne

diseases, and how they present.

The accuracy of diagnostic tests are abysmal, treatment options are inadequate.

The entire life-cycle for a tick-borne disease patient is appalling, from prevention, to

diagnosis, to treatment, to recovery.

I will have spent over 21 years serving my country.

Every day, I was measured and held accountable to the highest, strictest, standards of professionalism.

That's as it should be.

The Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs need to answer to the same level of accountability

in their care of service members, veterans, and military families, with regard to tick-borne

disease.

I firmly believe they are uniquely suited to take an impactful leadership role in this

area.

Let's empower and resource them to do so, let's them lock their full potential.

Now would be a great time to drastically increase funding to the congressionally directed medical

research program for tick-borne disease.

This working group has the opportunity to harness the rapidly evolving science in a

way that joins forces with clinicians, and patients.

You have my full support, and encouragement.

Thank you.

[applause]

>> Dazon Dixon Dialo: Thank you.

Thank you so much Colonel, and thank you for your service.

Let's welcome Olivia Goodreau.

Olivia?

[applause]

>> Olivia Goodreau: Hello.

My name is Oliva Goodreau, and I am 13 years old, and am from Denver, Colorado, and I have

Lyme disease.

I have had Lyme disease, for half of my life, and I do not remember what it feels like not

to be sick.

The summer in-between my first, and second grade year, when I was seven, I was bitten

by a tick in Missouri, on vacation.

We did not see the tick, and I did not have a bullseye rash.

When my second-grade year began, I started having body aches, brain fog, headaches, tremor

in my right hand, I couldn't hold up my head, my legs would go numb, or burn.

I had balance problems, light and sound sensitivities, and I started blacking out.

My body felt like wood, and it was very hard to get out of bed.

My parents took me to over 50 doctors.

I had MRI's, CAT scans, Spinal Taps, EKG's, liver biopsy, under and lower endoscopy.

I had my adenoids removed, and over 100 blood draws.

I spent a week in the hospital, and was in and out of the E.R. I was told I needed to

drink more water, then I was misdiagnosed with Wilson's Disease, and told that I would

not live past the age of 40.

Then, when the DNA test came back, saying that I did not have Wilson's Disease, I was

asked if maybe I was making this up.

January 29th, 2013, my 51st doctor finally diagnosed me with Lyme Disease.

This doctor put me on 30 days of antibiotics, and said that I would be back to normal.

By the fifth day of being on the antibiotics, my parents said that they had seen the twinkle

in my eye that had been missing for 18 months.

I felt much better, and my third-grade teacher called my mom, and said, "I just met Olivia

for the first time, and she is really funny."

And, they both started to cry.

Unfortunately, after my 30 days of antibiotics were over, all of my symptoms had come back.

My parents knew that they needed to find a Lyme specialist.

For three years, I bounced around to different Lyme doctors in Colorado, but I was not getting

better.

My 54th doctor, is Doctor Richard Horowitz, with his M6 model, not only do I have Lyme

Disease, but he diagnosed me with Bartonella, Barbisio, relapse in fever, POTS Syndrome,

low immune globin's, and anti-one trip zone deficiency in my liver.

This is all from one tick bite that I never saw, and never had a rash, and 53 doctors

missed everything.

What second grader would make up a tremor in her hand, blacking out, and not being able

to hold up her own head?

While my friends were on spring break, I had a liver biopsy, spinal tap, and hundreds of

tests that I did not need.

I read a story about a single mom with an eight-year-old son, who had Lyme Disease,

and how the mom gave up their apartment, and was living in their car, so her son could

get his Lyme Disease medication.

After reading that story, I knew I had to do something to help these kids with Lyme

Disease.

So, on January 18th, 2017, I launched the LivLyme Foundation.

I have raised $288,000 for kids that cannot afford their Lyme medication, and for scientists,

and their research, for better tests, better treatment, and to find a cure for everyone

that is suffering from Lyme disease.

Since January 18th, we have had 41 families, from 22 different states, apply for grants.

The children are ages four to 20, with four families having three, or more, kids with

Lyme Disease.

This Saturday, I will be announcing the 10 families that will be receiving a grant from

the LiveLyme Foundation.

This has been really hard, because I wish I could help all of these families and their

kids.

I have already given $75,000 in research grants to Dr. Sapi, at New Haven, Dr. Zhang, at Johns

Hopkins, and Dr. Rajad is at Stanford.

My next grant will be going to Dr. Lewis at Northeastern.

Having met, and toured, all of these scientists' Lyme Labs, which I learned how hard they,

and their team, are working for the Lyme community.

These scientists give me hope that we will have better treatment, and a cure, in the

future.

So, I am here today to represent all of the children that are told that they are making

it up.

I am here to represent all of the people that are sick with Lyme Disease, and that cannot

help themselves.

I am here to represent all of the people that have lost their savings to help their loved

ones with Lyme Disease.

And, I am here because if a 13-year-old girl from Denver, Colorado can make a small difference

in the Lyme world, think of what this panel of experts can do.

Thank you for your time.

>> Dazon Dixon Dialo: Thank you, Olivia.

[applause]

Thank you so very much.

Let's now hear from Amy Fitzgerald.

Welcome, Amy.

>> Amy Fitzgerald: Thank you for allowing me to speak.

My name is Amy Fitzgerald, and I've been living with Lyme Disease for 22 years.

I was undiagnosed for the first 15 years of my life, when -- first 15 years, and was told

I had Ankylosing Spondylitis, and then Fibromyalgia, even though I didn't meet the criteria for

either diagnosis.

I cannot recall if I was tested during this time for Lyme Disease.

My story is that I woke up one morning as a 24 year old, and could not get out of bed.

My legs were paralyzed.

I was in a wheelchair briefly, and then I moved on to crutches for mobility.

I could not weight bear on my legs.

I had pain in my joints, my back, my hips, I couldn't move my neck, my eye flared up,

and I was diagnosed with Iritis.

I had to sit in my bed, in the dark, as I was sensitive to light.

I couldn't drive, I couldn't go to work, and I was 24 years old.

I suffered from chronic fatigue.

I lived this way for 15 years, going to doctor, to doctor, to doctor.

At one point, I thought I was dying.

Many times, I was told the pain was in my head, and I was told I would never run again.

When I was 39, on Thanksgiving Day, I was tired of being sick, and tired.

I decided to try and run, and it was a very slow start, run-walk.

But, I pushed myself for five miles, with my husband by my side.

I continued to run, walk, and train for my very first long-distance race, a 10-miler.

I had never felt better as the weeks passed.

Remember, the doctor's told me I would never run again.

They told me to rest.

The pain slowly started to disappear, and I put away my crutches, although they still

sit in my room, but I haven't used them for quite a while.

When less than a year had passed, and I developed pain in my wrist, and elbows, and I was so

tired.

I went to an infectious disease doctor, who tested me for Lyme Disease.

My tests show I had a past infection, and currently have positive antibodies showing

current infection of Lyme Disease.

I was perplexed, because I had never been treated for Lyme Disease, and I didn't remember

being bit by a tick, or having a bullseyes rash, currently, or in the past.

It took two months of antibiotics to heal my body, of my Lyme Disease symptoms.

I ran my first marathon, the Marine Corps Marathon, and shortly after finishing my antibiotic

treatment.

It is still my personal best marathon time, after running over 20 marathons, and ultra-marathons,

including the Umstead 100-miler, who I raise funds for, for Nat Cap Lyme.

Two years later, I developed debilitating pain in my ankle bone.

I researched different causes, and one thing that stood out in my research, was the pain

could be caused by Lyme.

But, I was healed from Lyme, I took those two months of antibiotics.

I requested my doctor test me for Lyme, and my antibiotic blood test came back with the

same exact results as it was two years prior.

She called, and told me I have chronic Lyme Disease, which is kind of unheard of in the

medical world.

I was prescribed two months of antibiotic treatment.

This is when I dove into my research, and put the puzzle pieces together, and made the

realization that I've been living with Lyme Disease since that terrible morning I woke

up, and I wasn't able to walk.

My life forever changed, as I knew it.

And, today I still live with chronic Lyme, and recently had a relapse this summer.

I want to introduce my daughter, Kaitlyn Fitzgerald, so, she'll talk about the pediatric side.

Thank you.

[applause]

>> D�zon Dixon Dialo: Thank you, Amy.

Thank you for sharing your story.

Kaitlyn Fitzgerald, please join us at the mic.

>> Kaitlyn Fitzgerald: Hello everybody, I'm Kaitlyn Fitzgerald, and I'm 14 years old.

My Lyme story is, I've been experiencing symptoms for as long as I can remember.

Which include joint pains, muscle spasms, and headaches.

But, there are also a lot more that I didn't realize weren't normal, because I thought

they were, you know, not out of the ordinary.

So, as you saw before, my mom has had Lyme Disease for a very long time, and since I've

been experiencing these symptoms for a very long time, I've -- she's wondered if she had

passed it on, through utero.

So, when we went to the doctor, my mom would always mention my headaches.

They told me I was dehydrated, and I needed to drink more water.

But, I've [laughs] been drinking lots of water, and bringing water bottles with me to school

every day, so that was a little weird.

And, the doctors always called these pains that I had 'growing pains', and I would just

stop getting them eventually.

But, here's the thing: I actually still have them, and they're much worse than they were

before.

One morning, when I was around seven, I woke up, and I couldn't put any weight on my left

leg.

My knee was basically paralyzed, and my mom took me to the Urgent Care center, and they

ran a bunch of tests, and they concluded nothing was wrong with me, which was concerning.

The next morning, I woke up, and I was fine, but one of the tests they didn't run was the

Lyme test.

And, after my mom found out she had Lyme, she did a lot of research, and she got my

siblings and I tested, since we like to play outside a lot when we were younger.

And, I came back positive for Lyme, and my mom asked the pediatrician for me to have

a month of antibiotics.

After I got my antibiotics, I felt great, I didn't really have any symptoms.

But, after a couple months, they came back, along with a lot more, including nerve sensations,

my muscles are wonky [laughs], anxiety, and sight hallucinations, and many more.

When I first told people I had Lyme Disease, I actually didn't really know what it was,

and neither did my friends.

One of my friends actually said, "Isn't that the disease that just makes you really tired?"

And, I thought that was an interesting point to bring up.

So, actually, this summer my mom brought me back to the pediatrician -- it was a different

doctor this time.

And, we told her what was going on, and how my symptoms have gotten worse since I got

treated.

And, she said she wasn't allowed to treat me, or give me anything, because she didn't

want to get in trouble, and she didn't want to do anything she shouldn't do.

Which, is understandable, but the problem is, I'm still sick, I still have symptoms,

and it seems that there's nothing they can do about it for me, which, also, is concerning

because I can't exactly get better.

And, I have pains every day, I have brain fog, it's hard to focus in class, and there's

not much I can do about it.

And I know there's a lot of other people out there like me, who are experiencing the same

thing, and there's nothing they can really do about it either.

So, I'm really excited that I was offered the opportunity to come here today, I found

this an amazing experience, to come and listen to what you guys have to say.

Thank you.

[applause]

>> D�zon Dixon Dialo: Thank you, Kaitlyn.

And, if I may, Kaitlyn, in terms of how you're feeling every day, and in terms of what the

future looks like, you are doing something.

You've done a great thing here, today, and I thank you.

[applause]

Let's welcome to the mic, Jill Auerbach.

Jill.

>> Jill Auerbach: Hello, and thank you.

We need gold standards serology for all tick-borne diseases, two, we need cures to suffering.

Three, tick research to stop ticks, and disease.

Funding -- fourth, funding commensurate with tick-borne diseases.

The last two, we need to accomplish.

All of us -- all of us have a dire need to include tick research as a critical part of

the solution being derived by this work group.

Yet, no tick scientist was included.

The ability for the HHS Secretary to include that is stated in section 26-G2.

Quote, "Other individuals whose expertise is determined by the secretary to be financial

to the functioning of the working group" end quote.

What we have, is a huge environmental -- tick problem, which was first noticed in the Connecticut

area.

It has been allowed to spread, unabated, for 44 years, because of the lack of government

funding, and attention.

Lyme is now in about 50% of the counties in the United States, that's not including the

other tick pathogens, and tick species.

All have increased, and spread like wildfire.

The societal cost of Lyme Disease alone, is about $3 billion, while NIH funding is only

about $24 million, and CDC about $10 million a year.

Does this make any sense?

Ticks and mosquito vectors infect us with voracious pathogens.

In the U.S., tick-borne disease outnumbers mosquito disease by about 80-to-1.

But, funding is in the reverse.

Until the tick population is reduced, and the tick ability is blocked from being able

to transmit pathogens, the scourge of Lyme, and other tick-borne diseases, will continue

to march across the USA, infecting, re-infecting, and co-infecting us, our children, our pets,

and the critters that spread them.

We must protect our future generations; these children should not be getting sick.

The problem has grown way beyond just one disease, and other fatal, hemorrhagic, encephalopathic

tick-borne diseases are certain to reach our shores.

A patch for Lyme disease is not a solution for the environment.

Tick research scientists hold the most potential to bring about fruitful solutions.

About 40 prestigious scientists join Tick Research to Eliminate Disease scientist coalition,

TRED, in support of what I said.

That should be enough to convince everyone of the critical importance of this long-neglected

field.

Just one example, transgenic mosquito research is making great strides.

I ask, why hasn't there been any transgenic research on ticks started?

I urge the secretary to add tick scientists to this work group, and challenge you to include

this as critical part of your discussions.

The time is now.

I add two quick items.

Disturbing, is that missing Steven Wycell, tick researcher, and basic scientists, such

as Monica Embers.

You must -- also, you must discuss a stop-gap measure, which could be Nucatone.

Food great to humans, kills mosquitos, and ticks, but not honey bees.

CDC testing demonstrated that a soap wash caused infected ticks to drop off of mice,

killing 85 percent of them, no mice were infected.

Since most tick-borne pathogens transmit in over 12 hours, a simple nightly shower, or

bath, could prevent many diseases.

Simple, safe, inexpensive.

Better than tick checks.

By the way, it's being funded by the CDC for mosquitos.

Thank you, very much, for your attention.

[applause]

>> D�zon Dixon Dialo: Perfect.

Thank you so much, Jill.

Next up, we have Erica Keys-Land.

>> Erica Keys-Land: Hello, thank you so much for the opportunity to address you this afternoon.

I've also submitted written comments for the record, but I'd like to use this opportunity

today, to share with you my personal story, as well as my suggestions for the mission

of the working group.

Having worked for 13 years as an attorney at the Department of Health and Human Services,

Office of Chief Counsel for the Food and Drug Administration, I wrote, and reviewed, drug

regulations, and also prosecuted those who failed to follow them.

However, I'm here today as a Lyme Warrior, as I've been battling Lyme Disease myself,

for six years.

I never saw the classic bullseye rash, and I never had a positive Western blot test.

My symptoms started with joint pain, and brain fog, which got progressively more debilitating

as I, like so many other Lyme Warriors, went searching from doctor to doctor, and found

no answers.

Finally, I tested positive for Lyme through a clinical diagnosis, from my wonderful infectious

disease specialist, Dr. Joseph Jemsek.

Two of my children have Lyme disease.

My son had a bullseye rash, which was misdiagnosed as ringworm.

He contracted Lyme, by the way, while living in New York City.

We all know, regrettably, that the new data shows that Lyme Disease is an unreported illness,

and at least six times more common than HIV and AIDS.

Thus, I think there should be an HIV, and AIDS style Manhattan Project to combat this

serious pandemic.

My suggestions for your working group are one, revoke the archaic, and ineffective IDSA

Lyme Guidelines, and establish new ones.

Next, establish a new standard for Lyme Disease testing.

Third, review the evidence for the existence of chronic Lyme Disease.

Come up with a new name, if you must, but most importantly, publicly acknowledge that

the scientific evidence proves that Lyme Disease does, in fact, persist.

Make a public health announcement, so that those of us that are affected do not have

to fight this silent battle with our team of scientific-based doctors, and with insurance

companies.

Once you publicly acknowledge the chronicity of Lyme Disease, then internists, rheumatologists,

all doctors around the world, will stop looking at us like we're crazy.

Furthermore, you might even save the lives of so many people who indeed have Lyme, but

might be misdiagnosed with ALS, and M.S., Fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue, and so many

other diseases that are overlooked.

Fourth, conduct further trials of antibiotic therapy, or other alternative forms of treatment,

such as stem cell therapy, and also encourage pharmaceutical, and other alternative medical

industry participation, using the best of both eastern, and western, medicine.

Fifth, stop putting forth efforts, and scarce resources, into the failed Lyme vaccine concepts,

because there's been more than one.

Thank you so much for the opportunity to speak today.

If you need any more Lyme patients, I'm here, would love to help out.

One more thing, Dr. Jemsek, who's here today, if there's any way you could get him up on

the mic to say a few words today, I would -- I'm sure he'd be a benefit to this process.

Thank you so much.

[applause]

>> Dazon Dixon Dialo: Thank you, Erica.

Let's now hear from Kristina Bauer.

Kristina, take your place at the mic, please.

>> Kristina Bauer: Good afternoon.

Thank you all for having us here today, and coming yourselves.

My name is Kristina Bauer, I am a physician facilitator for the North Texas Lyme group,

owner of Yoga Center G-spine Wellness Center for 12 years, and mother of four, ages eight

through 14.

I caught Lyme Disease 35 years ago in Illinois from several tick bites, playing in the woods

by my house.

I've seen countless doctors, and had many different, inaccurate diagnoses.

I treated GI Lyme, misdiagnosed as Chromes Disease ineffectively for 26 years, following

ulcers, and, as well, an obstruction.

Could have killed me.

Gastroenterologists would recommend immuno-suppressants as my only line of treatment, many times.

This type of uneducated recommendation by the GI community could cause the Lyme to take

over my immune system.

In contrast, I started an antimicrobial, and immune building stomach protocol five months

ago, resulting in no more ulcers, pain, or inflammation.

I passed Lyme to all four of my kids, our children, during gestation unnecessarily,

as research shows.

The government knew Gestational Lyme existed back in 1985.

I have the studies today, to talk about after this meeting, if you're interested in those.

Some of my children, and I, have been bedridden in severe pain, had seizures -- my son on

his seventh birthday, which we had to cancel his seventh birthday party because of that,

lost the use of our body, and brain.

One child was in four different schools by the second grade, due to undiagnosed illness

causing severe learning difference.

After treatment, he gets straight A's, and mom's so proud, and he has rebuilt his self-confidence.

We have spent over $100,000 on extended antibiotics, and other validated therapies, and successfully

cleared four, of five, of us of viruses, Lyme and co-infections, but only for now, as it

is lying dormant forever, once you get it.

$52 million over 17 years of government grants studying infections have yielded no tangible

benefits to Lyme patients.

Therefore, I propose to you today, several things.

Number one, anyone who denies persistent Lyme be banned from participating in the tick-borne

disease working group.

[applause]

Thank you.

Non-pharmaceutical therapies is number two, that are peer-reviewed and validated, need

to be covered by insurance companies, so everyone has access to treatment that works.

Number three, encourage the millions of cancer clinics across the United States, and the

world, to integrate Lyme treatment that could provide an immediate ability to treat severely

desperate Lyme sufferers, since Lyme affects the B cells, similarly to cancer.

Number four, patients who have been bankrupted, and disabled by this disease require government

sponsored medical care, to regain the capacity of productive -- being productive members

of society.

In July, after treating for five years, I've had a poor, and a pick line.

I went to Germany, and received 10 million of my own blood cells -- stem cells, and have

seen healthier days then since I was a child.

Number five, I look forward to the U.S. offering the use of auxologist blood stem cells to

repair the damage from Lyme and Co-infections someday.

Number six, and lastly, demand that doctors use the most current, and AMA approved, CME

training online, written by Dr. Maloney, and are free on many websites, including txlda.org

website.

I'm hearing today we are forward thinking, so I'm asking to you, please update the link

on CDC's website to NIH, which still hosts IDSA treatment guidelines with current science,

not old science.

We demand, and deserve better.

Thank you for listening today.

[applause]

>> D�zon Dixon Dialo: Thank you so much, Kristina, thank you.

Next up, Tim Lynagh.

Tim.

And, tell me if I pronounced that incorrectly.

>> Tim Lynagh: Lynagh, actually, you got that right.

Yeah, I think I'm, kind of, a -- well, I feel like I'm in an awkward position, following

all those heart-wrenching patient stories.

And they were, I mean, I was close to tears, over there, at one time, myself.

My name's Tim Lynagh, and I started working on Lyme when I was on -- working on Capitol

Hill.

And, then, when I left the Hill, I started to volunteer with the Lyme Disease Association.

And, I'm not going to do a broad brush, or a broad take, on issues, but to address some

specific issues related to surveillance.

Surveillance of both human disease, and tick vectors, is important, because it provides

us an idea of risk, in terms of prevalence of exposure, and provides data necessary to

estimate disease burden including both morbidity, and mortality, and financial cost to individuals,

and society.

Surveillance issues also have a major impact on the individual's ability to receive diagnosis,

and treatment.

Now, as Gregg Skall had mentioned, significant attention should be paid to the Lyme Disease

case definitions developed by CDC in collaboration with the Council of State and Territorial

Epidemiologists.

Case definitions constitute surveillance criteria, not diagnostic criteria.

A history of surveillance case definitions for Lyme Disease since 1995 show them getting

significantly more stringent.

But, up until the 2017 iteration, they all contained the statement, quote, "This surveillance

case definition was developed for national reporting of Lyme Disease.

It is not intended to be used in clinical diagnoses."

Close quote.

Even before that language was dropped from the case definition, patients across the U.S.

were refused diagnosis, and treatment by physicians who told them, "You do not meet CDC criteria."

And, physicians who did treat were often subject to discipline.

This is particularly relevant to those in the south, and Midwest, who have consistently

been told they have little, or no, Lyme, in what are now called Low Incident States, a

2017 surveillance term.

The definition of high incidents, and its application in the case definition, make it

almost impossible for any state that is not now classified as high incidence to become

so designated.

Tens of thousands of people over time had to travel across the country to high incident

states, to receive care.

Many have progressed to chronic disease, and been severely debilitated, when early diagnosis

and treatment had been denied, based on surveillance criteria.

And, now, the MMWR has even stopped reporting case numbers weekly, although Lyme has one

of the highest reported case numbers in the MMWR.

Only an annual total is now reported.

Access to care is dependent upon accurate surveillance, as is funding, since diseases

with high numbers, and high disease burden are considered more deserving of funding.

The $40-$45 million spent by the federal government, including CDC, NIH, and DOD's CDMRP, is inadequate

to address Lyme, which can be demonstrated to be close to 400,000 new cases in 2015,

based on 90 percent underreporting.

We also need to develop a more systematic, and comprehensive, plan for surveillance of

human TBD's other than Lyme, and co-infections.

As well as a comprehensive vector surveillance strategy.

In a 2017 article, tick-borne zoonoses within the U.S. persistent with emerging threats

to human health, Ben Beard, Christopher Paddock et al, described 12 major TBD caused by 15

distinct disease agents, by the 8 most common human biting exuding ticks in the U.S.

>> D�zon Dixon Dialo: Time.

>> Tim Lyna: Six of the 15 pathogens were recognized in caught illness -- to cause illnesses,

only within the past two decades.

Thank you.

[applause]

>> D�zon Dixon Dialo: Thank you so much, Tim.

So, now I'd like to call to the mic, Gill Lake.

Gill.

>> Gill Lake: Thank you.

I just wanted to point out that this panel here is dedicated to cognitive dissonance

eradication, are we in agreement?

You had a really good display up there, with the hands on the bible, but that is not a

constitutional thing, you could have just as well had a constitution to put your hands

on, it's all I'm going to say, thank you.

>> D�zon Dixon Dialo: Gill.

[applause]

And, I'd like to call to the mic, last but not least in the voices of this afternoon,

Meghan Delaney.

Meghan.

>> Meghan Delaney: Does this -- can I sit?

I'm wondering if that's a -- oh, no -- [inaudible] okay.

I don't trust my autonomic nervous system right now.

So, I wasn't sure if I was going to make it here today, so I don't have anything prepared.

This is really important to me, I'm here as a private citizen, but I've worked for the

Department of Defense my entire career in the healthcare field.

I'm not a clinician.

My story starts off a bit like a "House" episode.

At 29 years old, I got off of a rollercoaster in San Antonio, Texas, and had what looked

to be a heart attack.

And, that didn't really make much sense to most people.

I worked around a lot of physicians who knew me, and knew my work ethic, and knew who I

was, and saw me deteriorate over the next few years, and scratched their heads.

They all believed something was very wrong, but no one was quite sure what it was.

And, because it manifested initially with me as cardiac symptoms, I was pushed through

the system, I was seen all over the place, I was at Hopkins.

It eventually moved into my nervous system.

Again, none of us knew exactly what was going on at the time, I lost the ability to walk,

they started to think I had M.S.

I was seeing rheumatology, neurology, cardiology.

I ended up out at Cleveland Clinic four and a half years later, after now being on disability

for six months.

Didn't really get too far there, and, then, I ended up getting pulled out of my car on

66 unresponsive with another stroke, and as I was in the emergency room at Fairfax hospital,

the doctor recognized me from my work with DOD, and international health, and asked me

what DOD was doing for Ebola.

As I was laying there [laughs], unable to move one side of my body, and unable to talk.

So, there's some irony here.

I knew at that point, after four and a half years of this, and the complete deterioration,

that I was going to possibly end up dead.

I was, thankfully, able to see a Lyme specialist, who got me the right testing eventually.

I want to make it clear that through the journey, there were doctors who truly believed something

was very wrong, and they were more than willing to go through the process -- the lengthy process

of submitting me for NIH rare disease programs.

But, before this all started, I had a bite on my leg, and I showed it to the doctors

that I worked with, who are my colleagues.

And, no one ever put two and two together.

So, unfortunately, this has greatly impacted my life, and my family's life, I had to drop

out of grad school, my career goals have completely changed.

I'm here today -- I'm really happy to see what's happening.

I'm a little concerned, and I'm hoping that this working group can help with the fact

that I work with scientists, I work with clinicians, I know what they need to see, I know what

they want to see, and I know they saw me happening, but I didn't fit their textbook, in what they

learned in med school 30 years ago.

And, I didn't fit the diagnostic criteria, and the blood work that showed up as results.

But, they still believed something was very wrong.

I'm hoping this working group can help highlight the fact to conventional medicine, and mainstream

medicine, that this issue is not case closed.

We might not have all the answers, but don't write people off, and never look at this issue

again.

The amount of money that has been spent on me through the medical system, and what I've

spent, you know, a lot of this probably could have been addressed initially, and I never

would have gotten to the place I'm in.

So, thank you for being here, thank you for your time, and I really look forward to the

progress of the working group.

[applause]

>> Dazon Dixon Dialo: Thank you, Meghan, thank you so much.

For the brave, courageous, honest, direct voices and messages that are all so loving,

that are all so strong, and that are all so determined to see things happen, and to see

something change, please give a rounding, sound of applause for all of the voices we've

heard this afternoon.

[applause]

This is what resilience to revolution looks like.

Thank you all.

What I didn't tell you, as I take my seat, turn this over -- back over to Dr. Wolitski,

is that as a member of ACT UP, and as a part of the women's HIV Aids movement.

Prior to 1994, that was more than 13 years into the epidemic, already with hundreds of

thousands of people already dead, or dying, including women who were sick from day one,

and had never been diagnosed.

There are women who died, never knowing why, and families who were never able to say way,

and it took us three plus years of a determined, hard fought, ugly, awful fight just to be

included.

Because, we knew that women were experiencing things differently.

And, in 1994, the Centers for Disease Control finally expanded the definition of what was

then known as AIDS, to include women, and children, and more homeless people then they

had before.

And, more poor people, who were not getting those diagnoses.

We then went on, because that doesn't end the fight.

We needed more research, to know which drugs work best, were there gender differences,

were there any other differences, and could we do better with treatment?

And, by the way, can't we do better with prevention?

We're 37 years into this epidemic, and we're still fighting for those things, but we have

so, so, so many wins, that we can count along the way.

And, I'm telling you this, because I know that there's that high school chant -- I'm

just going to say this, my high school -- my high school alma mater team just got the state

championship stolen away from them in the state of Georgia, this past week.

So, I can say, I believe that we will win.

I believe that we will win, and I know that you will win, and that you will stop the suffering.

There's a man -- I used to call him my movement husband, maybe because he's really smart,

and really good looking, but he doesn't know me, so I figured that might not be appropriate.

So, I started calling him my movement muse.

He's a human rights lawyer, he fights on behalf of juveniles in the justice system.

He actually won the Supreme Court case to make it unconstitutional to sentence juveniles

to life in prison.

He's an amazing human being, and I heard him speak, and I read his book.

And, he has these four tenants which I define as the most important pillars to sustaining

social change, to sustaining the end result, and the fight, which is always long, and seems

unending, and how to count our battles along the way, when we do know we've won.

And, here are those four tenants, and I want to raise them, because I think that you have

already laid out the foundation to sustain this work, and social change.

Just based on Bryan Stevenson, author of "Just Mercy", director of Equal Justice Initiative.

One, proximity.

You have to be proximate to the issue.

You have people on your working group, you have the voices of people in the room who

are living, or have lived, the experience, and know the ins and outs of what you need

to know of what this looks like, and feels like, and including those voices in the work

that you are about to do.

You are already getting proximate.

Two, change the narrative.

Change the narrative.

I've heard that there needs to be changes in the IDSA, that there need to be changes

in how physicians identify Lyme Disease, and other tick-borne, and other vector related,

I've heard that you might even need to change the name.

Change the narrative, do not let the consistency of status quo stagnate what has to change

in what you are looking to achieve.

Number three, you got to be willing to get, and make, other people uncomfortable.

You got to be willing to step outside of your own comfort zones, speaking in public when

you're not accustomed to it, joining boards that may require you to do a little bit more

work, voluntarily.

All kinds of things, that you might not be as comfortable talking about, or getting involved

in.

Because, I believe that as long as you're comfortable, you aren't trying to change anything.

And, the last one, is protect the hope.

You have to believe every day that you are doing something that's going to make a difference,

and that you're going to win.

And, I truly believe that you are well on your way, and he doesn't know you all either,

maybe, but I have a feeling that Bryan Stevenson would be just as proud of you, as I am.

And, so, thank you so very much for including me in your process today, and for trusting

me to facilitate the sound of your stories.

Thank you very much.

[applause]

We have a thank you to add.

So, this is a sound of appreciation?

>> Jill Auerbach: Yeah.

I want to thank all of you for your dedication, and to the hope that we will find a difference

for the future generations.

I also want to bless, and thank, the doctors who maintained their Hippocratic Oath by not

deserting the patients, by treating us, when I thought my life was completely over.

I had a doctor who did not desert me.

I bless them for their dedication, and for their willingness to even stand up, and be

prosecuted, and everything else, for doing what they knew was right.

Thank you for giving me my life back.

>> D�zon Dixon Dialo: Thank you.

[applause]

>> Jill Auerbach: And, all the others.

>> D�zon Dixon Dialo: And, all the others.

So, you just stole my thunder, I had your last little bit of appreci-love exercise.

That's where, you know, we appreciate, love each other at the same time.

But, I think you've taken care of that for me very well, Jill.

Gratitude is what keeps us moving, and I want to show mine, by handing over the mike to

Rich Wolitski.

Rich, thank you for inviting me, and for having me here today.

>> Richard Wolitski: Thanks, D�zon.

[applause]

I appreciate so much, for making time to do this, between your travels back and forth

between Atlanta, and South Africa, and the work that you do is truly inspirational.

So, I'm going to, before I say anything, ask if Kristin [phonetic sp], and John [phonetic

sp] want to add their comments to the end of it, and then we're going to talk a little

bit about tomorrow.

And, then, we'll be done ahead of schedule.

>> John Aucott: Takes a lot of courage for people to stand up, and it was really inspiring

to see that, and I think that's what we needed to hear, so I really appreciate everyone's

input, and for those of you, you know, attending virtually, we appreciate you as well, and

your time that you spent today.

And, you know, listening's important, and that's what we've done today, so, we're on

the right track.

>> Kristen Honey: Yeah, just, huge gratitude and thanks for all those who stood up and

shared their story, and all those who are still living them.

And, we will follow the four pillars, and not lose the hope.

And, I just want to reiterate before we close and go into tomorrow, that this is an ongoing

process, and a beginning, and decisions here, we can revisit them.

We have 13 members now, we'll have 14.

We're all people, and the decisions we make on this tick-borne disease working group if

we made them, we can unmake them, or remake them, or morph them, to fit the needs.

So, please think of this as an ongoing dialogue, and your contributions will shape the future,

and we'll go into some logistics, how to do that next.

>> Richard Wolitski: Thank you.

So, I'll just state the obvious, as well.

I mean, it's incredibly powerful, to hear directly from people about their experiences,

and, you know, so much to me.

Just brings back all these memories back, you know, in the late '80's, early '90's,

before we had effective HIV treatment, and just remembering what those days were like.

And, the one thing that, just always surprises me when I look back at them, was not that

we were depressed, and scared all the time, but that we had hope.

And, we just always had this sense, that if we just fought a little harder, worked a little

longer, and just kept on going, kept on trying, that somehow things would be better.

And, they have gotten better -- they're where they need to be, or where they could be, but

they're better.

And, I just, kind of, carried that hope with me, for all of you, for all of us, in the

work that we're doing here, that there's a tremendous opportunity.

People have said it a number of different times, the time is now, and I'm confident

that we're going to do you proud, and that we're going to do a great job with this process.

Is it going to be perfect?

No.

Will there be improvements that can be made over time?

Yes.

It's going to be a process.

And, I think, that's, sort of, you know, one of the things, you know, about life in general,

that, you know, you really learn the most when you mess up.

When you don't get it quite right, and you go back to it, and you try again.

And, you work on it until you get it right.

When you really mess up, is when you don't get it right the first time, and you don't

admit that you didn't get it right, or you just say, "I'm done, it's too hard, it's not

going to work for me."

And, so, I think, we've got some heavy issues that have been dealt with for a long time,

by a lot of people, and if they were easy, they would have been solved already.

And, so, I think it's that commitment that the members of the working group, the commitment

that all of you here in the audience, and all of you, who have taken your time at home,

or at work, wherever you are, to watch this on the internet, to build the community that

makes this work possible, and that will hopefully, ultimately, make it sustainable, as D�zon

has mentioned.

So, I really just, kind of, you know, want to thank you all for being here, and for approaching

the issues, and the work in the way that you have.

This has been -- just had great interactions with people, who have really, you know, taken

the time to educate me, share their stories, and I appreciate that.

So, tomorrow, we have a long day.

We're going to be starting the meeting promptly at 9:00 am.

The doors here, will open at 8:30 am, and, so, it will be the same sort of system as

yesterday.

Going through security, encourage you to be early, as so many of you were today.

So, we got a good start, right on time, which is unusual for these types of meetings.

So, we're going to start off the morning by hearing from some additional organizations,

be hearing from some provider organizations, and also hearing from public health organizations

after that.

And, then, it's going to shift into -- really, kind of, talking about the work, and talking

about, what is it that the working group has to do, and how's it going to do it?

And, that's really, kind of, tomorrow is, you know, after we hear from the professional

organization -- it's about the workplan, and it's about figuring out the work that needs

to be done, it's about timeline, it's about the task, and breaking it down, and figuring

out how we together go forward on this.

And, so, with that, I think I will turn it back to you, because I can't end the meeting

-- you have to adjourn it [laughs].

[inaudible]

>> John Aucott: Seconds?

All right, all in favor of adjourning today's meeting session say, "Aye."

>> Multiple Speakers: Aye.

>> John Aucott: Opposed?

The meeting's adjourned, thank you very much.

[applause]

>> Male Speaker: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, produced at taxpayer expense.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét