Star Wars: a New Hope is silly, unrealistic, and full of plot holes.
Then why does it feel so perfect anyway?
How come the non-existent science or the two dozen plot holes don't ruin this movie,
but can sabotage so many others?
Is there a secret to how Star Wars tells its story so we don't care about logic gaps?
Yes, and that secret is tone.
Think of tone as the watchdog that every story needs.
It tells audiences what to expect in terms of mood and presentation.
What works for the story, and what doesn't.
It's clear from the beginning.
Civil war, you say?
I have an idea of what civil war looks like, and you may have another idea of what
civil war looks like.
But what is the right tone for a civil war in Star Wars?
Obviously, soldiers shooting at each other, but don't expect blood, missing limbs, or
dirt flying about.
Moreover, the tone ditches all attempts at realistic behavior.
For example, nobody bothers to build a barricade in the corridor or block the entrance.
Same goes for basic tactics like ducking, breaking cover, or laying down suppressive fire.
Realistic military maneuvering takes time, and usually it's more mechanical than dramatic.
For comparison, the Battle of Yavin takes 14 minutes and it's pretty fast-paced.
Pickett's Charge on Gettysburg takes up over 20 minutes of screen time, and it's
less dynamic.
One, of course, is fantasy in space, and the other a historical epic.
Two different approaches lead to two different tones.
For more examples, we know that war can be brutal and random, but Star Wars doesn't
want to dwell on atrocities or overall grimness.
Vader's cruelty toward his captive is nowhere near as revolting or graphic
as it could be in real life.
And how about the soundtrack?
From the main theme onward, it's obvious music will play a key role in setting the
tone.
Having to choose between gloomy or optimistic, the soundtrack typically goes for the latter.
Check out the world of difference that a single track can make.
Either track fits what's on the screen, but only one track is in keeping with the
prevalent tone.
All of this combined makes it clear that Star Wars is going for a simplistic depiction of
war, not an accurate one.
So, do plot holes get a pass just because they happen to be in a space opera?
Short answer is "no."
But they are easier to put up with.
That being said, if you start indulging in plot holes, there's a risk of getting exceedingly
comfortable with them.
The earliest one happens when the Imperial gunners don't open fire on the escape pod.
Why's that?
Yeah, but there are plenty of robots in this universe.
The scene is even more annoying because it implies other escape pods have been jettisoned.
But later, an officer says.
Implying that only one pod was activated in the course of the battle.
The funny thing is, you can delete this brief moment and the movie wouldn't lose anything.
It's not the end of the world, but it's poor craftsmanship.
For now, remember that a strong, consistent tone can solve the issue of plot holes.
Not to avoid them, but to reduce their impact.
Thanks for watching.
If you want to help out, you can do so by subscribing and sharing my videos, but if
you can also afford to pitch in a few bucks via Patreon, that would buy me a lot more
time to put into the channel.
This has been One Dodgy Dude telling you, "go write a great story.
If you dare."



Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét