Thứ Tư, 4 tháng 4, 2018

News on Youtube Apr 4 2018

Jack Wilshere looks ahead to Arsenal's crunch clash against CSKA Moscow on Thursday night

The Gunners warmed up for the game with a 3-0 win over Stoke City in the Premier League

on Sunday to keep themselves in sixth place in the Premier League table.

With Arsenal currently way off the pace in the race for a top-four finish this season,

the north London club's best hope of qualifying for the Champions League will be to win the

Europa League this term.

Their European journey continues with the first leg of their quarter-final clash against

the Russian side at The Emirates this weekend.

And Wilshere has insisted that Arsenal are feeling more confident than they have for

quite some time after a run of victories in all competitions.

Speaking to Arsenal Player after the win over Stoke, Wilshere said: "It's a big game.

We needed that 90 minutes out of the way.

We needed to get the three points, move on and keep the momentum going.

"We've won a few in a row and wanted to keep that going.

Now we've got a big one on Thursday and we're ready for that."

Arsenal have not won the Premier League title since their famous unbeaten triumph under

Arsene Wenger back in 2003-04.

The Gunners look set to miss out on a top four finish for the second season running

after they ended up in fifth place in the Premier League table last term to leave them

in the Europa League this season.

For more infomation >> Jack Wilshere states his prediction for Arsenal vs CSKA Moscow ● News Now ● #AFC - Duration: 2:00.

-------------------------------------------

FNN: President Trump hosts Baltic States leaders, stocks look to rebound after tumbling - Duration: 2:40:52.

For more infomation >> FNN: President Trump hosts Baltic States leaders, stocks look to rebound after tumbling - Duration: 2:40:52.

-------------------------------------------

CONFIRMED THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ADMITS IT HAS NO ACTUAL - Duration: 9:16.

CONFIRMED THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ADMITS IT HAS NO ACTUAL DEFENSE AGAINST HYPERSONIC

MISSILES FROM RUSSIA AND CHINA

by Edward Morgan

RUSSIA AND CHINA ARE OUTPACING THE UNITED STATES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF SUPER-FAST HYPERSONIC

MISSILE TECHNOLOGY, PENTAGON OFFICIALS AND KEY LAWMAKERS ARE WARNING.

EDITOR�S NOTE: Yes, the US has the world�s biggest cache of nuclear weapons, that�s

true.

But that is not a defense for stopping incoming hypersonic missiles from Russia or China.

Nukes are a response to an attack but do nothing to defend against it hitting targets on American

soil.

As we get closer to May 2018, it seems to me that, from a biblical perspective, all

the ingredients for an end times conflict in multiple regions are settling into place.

Why is America so far behind Russia and China in hypersonic technology?

Because for 8 years Barack Obama stripped the military of dozens of generals and stopped

the development of much-needed technology.

The second reason is that I can show you Russia in the Bible, and I can show you China, but

I cannot locate the United States as a participant in the end times.

I think we are starting to see why now�

Russia says it successfully tested a so-called hypersonic missile this month, while China

tested a similar system last year expected to enter service soon.

�Right now, we�re helpless,� Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), a senior member of the Senate

Armed Services Committee, said in advocating for more investment in hypersonics, along

with missile defense.

Hypersonics are generally defined as missiles that can fly more than five times the speed

of sound.

Gen. John Hyten, commander of U.S. Strategic Command, last week described a hypersonic

as a missile that starts out �like a ballistic missile, but then it depresses the trajectory

and then flies more like a cruise missile or an airplane.

So it goes up into the low reaches of space, and then turns immediately back down and then

levels out and flies at a very high level of speed.�

In November, China reportedly conducted two tests of a ballistic missile with a hypersonic

glide vehicle that U.S. assessments expect to reach initial operating capability around

2020.

The country had already conducted at least seven tests of experimental systems from 2014

to 2016.

Meanwhile, earlier this month, Russian President Vladimir Putin delivered a flashy state of

the nation address to tout a slate of new weapons, including a hypersonic missile he

claimed was �invincible� against U.S. missile defenses.

About a week later, Russia claimed it successfully tested a hypersonic.

At the time of Putin�s announcement, the Pentagon said it was �not surprised� by

the report and assured the public that it is �fully prepared� to respond to such

a threat.

BUT IN CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY LAST WEEK, HYTEN CONCEDED U.S. MISSILE DEFENSE CANNOT

STOP HYPERSONICS.

HE SAID THAT THE U.S. IS INSTEAD RELYING ON NUCLEAR DETERRENCE, OR THE THREAT OF A RETALIATORY

U.S. STRIKE, AS ITS DEFENSE AGAINST SUCH MISSILES.

�We don�t have any defense that could deny the employment of such a weapon against

us, so our response would be our deterrent force, which would be the triad and the nuclear

capabilities that we have to respond to such a threat,� Hyten told the Senate Armed Services

Committee.

To bolster missile defenses against hypersonics, Hyten advocated space-based sensors.

�I believe we need to pursue improved sensor capabilities to be able to track, characterize

and attribute the threats, wherever they come from,� he said.

�And, right now, we have a challenge with that, with our current on-orbit space architecture

and the limited number of radars that we have around the world.

In order to see those threats, I believe we need a new space sensor architecture.�

Asked if the U.S. is really falling behind Russia and China on hypersonics, Thomas Karako,

director of the Missile Defense Project at the Center for Strategic and International

Studies, said flatly: �Yes.�

�And the reason is the U.S. hasn�t been doing anything near the same pace both in

terms of developing our own capabilities but also failing to develop sensors and shooters

necessary to shoot down theirs,� he continued.

Terrestrial sensors are limited in their ability because of the curvature of the earth, Karako

said, but �you can�t hide from a robust constellation of space-based sensors.�

YET WHILE THE LAST FIVE ADMINISTRATIONS HAVE IDENTIFIED SPACE-BASED SENSORS AS A CRITICAL

NEED ON PAPER, NOTHING HAS COME TO FRUITION, HE SAID.

�One of the reasons that we haven�t prioritized the hypersonic threat is we were slow to kind

of appreciate not merely the Russia and China problem, but the Russia and China missile

problem,� Karako said.

In that regard, he credited the National Defense Strategy and the Nuclear Posture Review, both

of which were unveiled by the Trump administration earlier this year, for their renewed focus

on a �great power competition� with Russia and China.

Sen. Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), chairwoman of the Senate Armed Services Strategic Forces Subcommittee,

likewise cited them as helping the U.S. get back on track in the area of hypersonics.

�I think we are aware of the capabilities that our adversaries have, and � whether

it�s the Nuclear Posture Review, National Defense Strategy, these are all laid out because

of the identification of the threats we have,� she said.

Fischer added that there �probably will be� something about hypersonics in her subcommittee�s

portion of this year�s annual defense policy bill.

But the Nuclear Posture Review, in particular, has been controversial for its call to develop

a sea-launched nuclear cruise missile and a �low yield� warhead for submarine-launched

ballistic missiles.

Those new capabilities are part of the deterrence that Hyten cited, but critics say the document

is poised to fuel an arms race.

�Calling for the addition of new weapons and weapons capabilities to our arsenal and

expanding the role of nuclear weapons in U.S. national security strategy imposes significant

economic burdens and undermines decades of United States leadership to prevent the use

and spread of nuclear weapons,� more than 40 House Democrats, led by Reps. Earl Blumenauer

(Ore.), Barbara Lee (Calif.) and Mike Quigley (Ill.), wrote Monday in a letter to President

Trump.

�We oppose this approach and will continue to support maintaining an effective nuclear

deterrent without wasting taxpayer dollars, inciting a new arms race or risking nuclear

conflict,� they said.

IN ADDITION TO THE NUCLEAR REVIEW, PENTAGON OFFICIALS HAVE BEEN TOUTING BUDGET PROPOSALS

THAT WOULD PUT MORE MONEY TOWARD HYPERSONICS AND MISSILE DEFENSE THAT THEY SAY WILL HELP

CLOSE THE GAP WITH RUSSIA AND CHINA.

Hyten told the Senate Armed Services Committee that there�s $42 million in the fiscal year

2019 budget for the Air Force and the Missile Defense Agency to work on a prototype for

space-based sensors.

Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson, meanwhile, told the House Armed Services Committee last

week her fiscal 2019 budget includes $258 million for hypersonics.

And Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Director Steven Walker touted his

$256.7 million fiscal 2019 budget for hypersonic missile development the same day as Putin�s

press conference.

Still, he said, DARPA needs more money for infrastructure to test the missiles, as most

of the agency�s testing is done out of one facility.

�The dollars that were allocated in this budget were great, but they were really focused

on adding more flight tests and getting some of our offensive capability further down the

line into operational prototypes,� he told the Defense Writers Group.

�We do need an infusion of dollars in our infrastructure to do hypersonics.�

Inhofe, the senator from Oklahoma, said he�s most worried about the missile defense issue,

adding there �appears to be no defense� against hypersonics.

To him, the answer is reversing defense budget cuts, which Congress has taken steps to do

in a two-year budget deal and a recently passed appropriations bill for fiscal 2018.

�We need to make up the losses that we had during the Obama administration by putting

a priority, which we are doing now, on the military,� he said

For more infomation >> CONFIRMED THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ADMITS IT HAS NO ACTUAL - Duration: 9:16.

-------------------------------------------

Border States marks construction milestone with beam ceremony - Duration: 2:14.

What an exciting day for all of us!

I'm Tammy Miller, the CEO at Border States.

It's a pleasure to be with all of you.

Border States is a very different company than it was when I took over as CEO in 2006.

At that time, we had 744 employees, we had 24 branch locations, and our sales were under

$500 million each year.

In just a couple of days, on March 31, we will have our fiscal year end.

This year, for the first time, our annual sales will surpass $2 billion.

We have 2,500 employee-owners across over 110 branch locations in 22 states.

So, you can imagine over the years our needs have changed, and so have our needs here in

Fargo.

I talked to my dad this morning, who is 82 and lives in Brocket, ND, a town of 57 people.

I told him about this event and he said, "You know, when I was in the Army in Germany when

they did this, at the ceremony, they would put a Christmas tree on top of the building."

And I said, "Well, we're going to do that, too, and we're going to put an American flag

on top of the building."

He was pretty proud and pretty pleased with what we are doing.

The tree signifies construction has reached the sky without loss of life or injury, and

that is a pretty strong statement.

The flag, I think we all know how proud we are to be Americans working for a 100 percent

employee-owned American company.

A lot of really nice significance behind this tradition.

Thank you to everyone else for coming out to join us.

We're looking forward to moving into this facility in spring 2019, and I hope one year

from today you'll all be joining us, and we'll be working in our new building and celebrating

a grand opening of the new Branch Support Center here in Fargo, ND.

Thank you all!

For more infomation >> Border States marks construction milestone with beam ceremony - Duration: 2:14.

-------------------------------------------

GFS Innovators Corner #6: Operator State Monitoring and Intervention for FVL & NGCV - Duration: 12:32.

- So with that I'm gonna hand over now to Dr. Felpman,

and then we'll return back at the end.

- Thank you.

Hi everyone, so, starting in our mission here,

it's midnight, and our pilots have

woken up for this crucial mission.

It's still dark out.

That makes it difficult to wake up, waking up

at midnight is difficult, and becoming alert to the

level that they need to perform this crucial mission

is also difficult for the pilots to obtain

if they haven't received an adequate amount of sleep,

if they had uncomfortable sleeping quarters,

if there is a lot of environmental noise,

and further compounding their fatigue

are circadian rhythm differences.

And so some individuals are able to wake up at odd hours

of the night and perform at their optimal alertness and

performance levels while others struggle to become alert.

And so those who are fatigued and not alert are at an

increased risk for making the errors that can cause mishaps.

And so, whoops, actually, I jumped ahead.

To avoid the detrimental effects of fatigues

we are evaluating how differences in circadian rhythm

can impact mission performance so that we can develop

fatigue mitigation approaches that are tailored to the

individual soldier, and to provide leaders with

the tools that they need to make our soldiers

able to perform at their optimal levels.

So moving on in our mission, it's 0100 hours,

and our soldiers are gearing up for their flight,

and in our future scenario this now includes putting on

flight gear that has biometric sensors embedded.

This can include an electrode that's built into

their helmet, some respiration and heart rate monitoring

sensors that are built into their tops,

and it can also include small cameras that are

built into the cockpit that monitors their eyes,

their eye movement, and their pupillary changes.

To make this possible, our team of researchers is

examining several different types of sensor technologies.

So we're looking at physiological monitoring of the brain

activity, the eye activity, respiration,

or heart rate, just to name a few.

We're doing this because we know that wearable technology

is everywhere, and is becoming less invasive.

So our studies will be able to determine what sensors our

soldiers need to wear, and what sensors are needed

to identify the cognitive changes

that may impede mission success.

So through these studies, we will be able to provide

the data that is needed to develop the algorithms

for predicting performance changes,

and develop a standardized objective metric for assessing

the impact of new technology on a soldier's performance.

So this metric could then be integrated into

the acquisition cycle, to ensure that the systems

we're trying to implement in the cockpit or the grounds

vehicles are actually able to help our human soldier

that's working with that machine,

and not hindering them from their ability to operate.

And moving on to 0130 hours, our pilots have taken off,

and now in our future scenario they're having to

coordinate not only with other manned aircraft,

but also other unmanned systems.

So this means that they will now have increased information

coming from multiple channels that they'll need to

be able to integrate, and make decisions based on,

as well as fly and maintain their situational awareness.

To successfully handle the increase flow of information

and maintain situation awareness to keep them safe,

our soldiers will need to be able to divert their attention

to different sources of mission input.

To help our soldiers successfully integrate

mission-essential information so that they can make

the decisions that are required,

we are examining how non-invasive brain stimulation

and pharmaceuticals can enhance their ability to

attend to different sources of information,

increase the speed at which they can

process that information, and make quick but accurate

decisions using all of those sources of information.

These will then be used in helping soldiers to enhance

their operational effectiveness before they go on a mission,

as well as to avert operator overload when it's detected

by biometric sensors during the mission.

So moving on in our mission, our pilots have been flying

for several hours, and they're now

at the critical point in the mission.

Their alertness is an absolute

necessity to ensure a successful mission,

but it's becoming difficult to maintain,

as they're now assuming control of autonomous vehicles,

as well as responding to and monitoring

video feeds of those ahead of them.

We do not currently have an objective means to detect

when an operator's performance is slipping in real time,

and so the biometric work that our team is doing will

enable the detection of when the

operator is becoming overloaded,

and we'll be able to do that in real time.

This will allow us to engage an adaptive automation system

that will ensure that the human and the machine are working

in a balanced manner so that the human stays engaged in the

mission, but does not become critically overwhelmed.

And so we're evaluating the impact of different sources of

workload that our operators will encounter,

such as cluttered visual displays,

or increased auditory feeds, and we're using this to

develop a suite of sensors that are most sensitive

to identify an overload within those different sources,

and to aid in the determination of which tasks

need to be offloaded to the machine

in order to maintain our operator's effectiveness.

And so to show a quick example of how we are able to

monitor brain activity in near real time we have this clip

from a recent study that we completed,

and so in the lower left box is what the pilot saw

when they were flying, and the lower right hand video

is what the out-the-window view was.

The upper left demonstrates how algorithms, using the

pilots' brain activity that we measured during the flight,

can be used to identify changes in their workload.

And so the yellow line which spikes upward is showing an

increased level of workload experienced.

And then the far right is a heat map showing how his

brain activity was changing during the flight.

We're most interested in increased

activity in the frontal lobes.

And so you might watch that and think

"So what? It looks kinda cool,

but what's the outcome of this?"

Well, as we continue collecting this type of data,

we can use numbers that are driving the changes

in those lines on the graph to then predict

when the automation needs to take control,

and use that to avoid a mishap instead of waiting until a

mishap is likely to engage an automated system.

And so finally, our pilots are at their last

leg of the mission, it's eight thirty they've returned to

friendly territory, but they've been flying for about

seven hours under some pretty stressful circumstances,

and they're now at risk for being

fatigued and becoming complacent.

And, in fact, we know that a significant number of

mishaps tend to happen during this time and within

these sorts of circumstances where

someone's fatigued and likely to become complacent.

And there currently is no validated method

for detecting states of inattention in real time.

Yet we know it's a threat to our aviators,

to our UAS operators, and even to our grounds troops.

And so the detection of these states is critical to

ensure safe mission completion.

We will be completing work where we induce this

state in soldiers and measure their physiological

response with our biometric sensors.

This will help us to create a validated and

reliable method to detect inattention and enable the

machine to then shift controls back to the human,

instead of away from the human,

to allow the human operator to stay engaged and

situationally aware of the mission that they are completing.

So those are just a few examples of the ongoing work

that our team of researchers are completing

to help our soldiers in the future battle space,

and I will now turn it back over to Colonel Taylor

for a couple of closing remarks.

- Thank you Dr. Felpman, I think we can all appreciate

how important that work is as we particularly move to

these autonomous, blended autonomy, you know,

variably autonomous platforms.

Right, they need to know when they need to help you out,

and you need to know when you need

to take control back from them,

and this is the foundational work that helps us

understand when the machine needs to help the man

and when the man can then take back over from the machine.

So we see this application directly translating into

programs like Future Vertical Lift,

the next generation combat vehicle.

We even think that there's gonna be applications

as soldier-lethality as ground soldier systems

become more and more complicated.

For the trivia question,

who owns most of the UAS platforms and the DOD?

The United States Army, actually.

Between those three programs, eagle, raven, and shadow,

we actually now have more unmanned platforms and

systems than any of the other services.

So there'll be a lot more UAS operators currently now

in the army than there will be in the other services.

So with that I think I'd like to

wrap up and see if there's any questions?

I do appreciate your time and attention today.

It's been a privilege to represent not only

yoo-ter-al laboratory but also to represent MRMC today,

and I open the floor to any questions.

(audience mumbling)

Yes sir?

- [Male Audience Member] Do you acquire and

analyze very large databases as part of this work?

- Yes sir.

- Just describe a little bit about what that looks like.

- So, Dr. Felpman is probably better qualified to

answer that, but you can imagine that a single experiment

actually generates enormous amounts of data.

So, that enormous amount of data taken over

multiple subjects, over multiple projects,

over multiple years, we actually

have a very extensive database.

Certainly one of the things we're trying to understand

as we move into the modern era is how do we apply

deep learning, how do we apply learning algorithms,

data management, how do we do those things well

so that we actually can mine not only the data that we

have collected, but actually data that's been collected

previously that we happen to store,

and use that in a way that helps us.

Right, we know, by other work,

that you can take a machine-learning algorithm

and show it thousands of pictures, right?

We have a dermatologist in the field,

you can show them thousands and thousands of images,

and the machine can actually start to detect

basal cells about as well as a human being or

with radiologic images, can do the same,

it can start to detect very fine.

So we also believe that there's a lot of great things

that can be detected in this data.

So in the next six to twelve months we are looking to

see how we can begin to apply that sort of

machine learning to the data that we do have.

Any other questions?

(audience mumbling)

Again, if nothing else, I'll be standing around, we'll be

back at our booth if you'd like a further demonstration.

But again, on behalf of General Hokelman,

Commanding Sergeant Major Rogers, and General West

who's also joined us here today,

the current surgeon general, we'd just like to

thank you for the opportunity to present today.

Thank you for your attention, and we'll be

happy to answer any questions you have, so, thank you.

(audience clapping)

For more infomation >> GFS Innovators Corner #6: Operator State Monitoring and Intervention for FVL & NGCV - Duration: 12:32.

-------------------------------------------

Pizza, Pad Thai And Pot: Home Delivery Of Marijuana Is Legal In These States - Duration: 9:34.

Pizza, Pad Thai And Pot: Home Delivery Of Marijuana Is Legal In These States

Ted S.

Warren/The Associated Press Michael "Billy the Kid" Kenworthy, a delivery driver in Seattle, seals a package of pot for a customer.

Marijuana delivery businesses remain illegal in Washington and several other states that have legalized possession and sale of the drug.

By Sophie Quinton   This story is part of an occasional series on marijuana laws in the states.

It's been legal to buy small amounts of marijuana in Colorado for over four years.

But consumers can't order buds, edibles or the marijuana concentrate called "shatter" through the mail — that's illegal under federal law.

And they can't have weed delivered to their doorstep, like a pizza or an order of pad thai.

Lawmakers in Colorado and other states that pioneered recreational marijuana legalization have been reluctant to allow home delivery, even in an era when consumers are used to getting everything from diamond rings to toilet paper delivered.

Supporters say delivery makes it easier for medical marijuana patients to get their medicine, helps licensed marijuana businesses compete with the black market, and could reduce drugged driving.

Opponents say delivery could make it easier for kids to buy drugs and could turn delivery cars into targets for thieves.

Skeptics also say launching a risky service could attract unwanted federal attention.

Denver is concerned that marijuana delivery could cause additional safety issues and draw federal scrutiny, according to a statement from Eric Escudero, communications director for the city's Department of Excises and Licenses.

Earlier this year, U.S.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions rescinded Obama-era guidance that had told federal prosecutors not to target marijuana businesses that are licensed and regulated.

Colorado legislators last year rejected language in a bill that would have legalized marijuana delivery.

Now they're considering a pilot program instead.

Democratic state Rep.

Jonathan Singer, a sponsor of both bills, said the earlier proposal failed because it went too far, too fast, for some of his colleagues.

The current bill is "a slow step in the right direction," he said.

Colorado, Washington state, Alaska and Washington, D.C., don't allow home delivery of marijuana.

Oregon, California and Nevada do, but services are not universal.

In Oregon, state data shows that close to two-thirds of counties have a dispensary licensed to make recreational marijuana deliveries.

In California, marijuana industry advocates say that less than a third of cities and counties in the state allow retail marijuana sales, which could include home delivery.

  But illegal and quasi-legal delivery businesses are widespread regardless of the law.

Washington, D.C., for instance, allows cannabis possession but not sales.

So businesses, including delivery companies, are selling overpriced stickers, cookies, and cold-pressed juice with a gift of cannabis thrown in.

"At Juiced, we make sure that all our products make an impact that will enhance your spirit and your mood:)," says one such company's website, with a coy smiley face emoji.

Safety, Diversion Concerns In Colorado, opponents of legalizing home delivery include law enforcement, county officials, the city of Denver and Democratic Gov.

John Hickenlooper.

"That notion of having a delivery person go around house to house and dropping off potentially significant amounts of marijuana — any amount of marijuana — I think we look at that as just a hazard," Hickenlooper told the Cannabist, a website of the Denver Post, last spring when the Legislature was considering legalizing home delivery statewide.

"And if we're really serious about keeping marijuana out of the hands of teenagers," he said, "delivery service offers more opportunity for that marijuana to get into the hands of kids." Home delivery could also bring marijuana sales into counties that don't allow such sales, said Eric Bergman, policy director at Colorado Counties Inc., a membership association for county officials.

More than half of the state's counties prohibit marijuana businesses within their jurisdiction, according to state data.

Some cities within those counties' borders do allow marijuana businesses to operate.

Marijuana businesses, meanwhile, are lobbying for a change in the law.

Advocates for a San Francisco-based marijuana delivery startup called Eaze, which some have called "Uber for weed," have told Colorado lawmakers that technology can help allay some of their concerns.

For instance, the Eaze app blocks orders to places where delivery isn't allowed.

"Eaze has a whole team of people that monitors, is it legal in that city? Is it legal in that ZIP code?" said Elizabeth Conway, principal at Gide LLC, a firm that lobbies for cannabis and tech companies.

Not all cities oppose permitting marijuana delivery.

Seattle Mayor Ed Murray, a Democrat, argued that allowing delivery would help licensed businesses compete with the black market, potentially driving out illegal businesses.

A supplemental budget bill currently on Democratic Washington state Gov.

Jay Inslee's desk would require regulators to study home delivery of medical marijuana.

Steven Senne/The Associated Press Marijuana and a T-shirt from Massachusetts pot delivery company Duuber.com.

Companies like Duuber exploit loopholes in state law that allow people to give away or "gift" up to an ounce of marijuana.

The Duuber T-shirt cost $100 but the marijuana was a gift.

Local Control States that do allow marijuana home delivery don't allow just anyone to drive around with weed for sale.

Oregon's rules address when pot can be delivered (8 a.m.

to 9 p.m.), where (only houses and apartments in the locality where the retailer is licensed), how often (one delivery per person per day), and to whom (adults over 21), for instance.

Drivers can't take more than $3,000 worth of weed products "out for delivery" at one time.

California's long list of rules includes a requirement that delivery vehicles be outfitted with a GPS tracking system and prohibits "unmanned vehicles" such as autonomous cars from delivering weed.

Cities and counties in both states can opt out of allowing delivery or set more stringent rules, adding further complication.

For more infomation >> Pizza, Pad Thai And Pot: Home Delivery Of Marijuana Is Legal In These States - Duration: 9:34.

-------------------------------------------

18 states sue Trump Administration over census (ASL - 4.3.18) - Duration: 1:27.

For more infomation >> 18 states sue Trump Administration over census (ASL - 4.3.18) - Duration: 1:27.

-------------------------------------------

NH is one of 13 states 'improving' opioid fight, report says - Duration: 1:40.

For more infomation >> NH is one of 13 states 'improving' opioid fight, report says - Duration: 1:40.

-------------------------------------------

Can welfare states and migration be combined? | Monique Kremer | University of Amsterdam - Duration: 3:34.

Can the welfare state and migration be combined?

That is a question that worries a lot of people.

With open borders migrants from all over the world will come to countries

with generous welfare states.

Sociologist also expressed worries: if you want to have solidarity, the basis of the welfare state

people need to trust each other.

and they need to identify with each other.

But: migration is part and parcel of contemporary society.

In the Netherlands, one in five people has a migration past.

In big cities this is one in three.

Migrants also increasingly tend to move back and forth, stay more temporarily

or live transnational lives due to internet and social media. What about their solidarity?

Some academics speak about super diversity.

In my view that sounds much too positive.

I am more worried about new unequalities, so I prefer to speak about unequal diversity

because a refugee or Polish tomatoe picker have different chances in life than a Indian IT knowledge worker.

So we do have migration, but, we also have a generous welfare state

The Dutch welfare state still has a fairly generous social security system, care policies, nearly universal health care policies.

So san welfare states be combined with migration and what does it mean for the future?

In my research I analyse welfare state policies, mainly social security and care policy.

Migrants are not often interviewed themselves about solidarity: it is mainly natives.

I analyse surveys, interview people and do participant observations when people meet

'the welfare state', for instance when they encounter the professionals working in it.

Indeed, welfare states and migration diversity can go along, but changes are necessary.

First to maintain the existing solidarity new conditionalities are necessary for our social security system.

Many natives feel solidarity towards outsiders in the Netherlands,

but they do not want to grant them the same rights from day one, when they enter the country.

People have to have work, they say

My research shows: that many migrants themselves also agree with that.

Secondly, to make sure that people with a migrant background also feel solidarity

we have to give them the feeling the welfare state is also their home.

Thirdly, to cherish solidarity people from different backgrounds, higher-lower educated people,

people born in the Netherlands and people from somewhere else, they need to meet each other

for instance in the labour market or in their neighbourhoud.

And social and care professionals are needed to make these difficult connections between

various people.

So, welfare state and migration can be combined, but we do have to adapt our welfare state.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét