News on Youtube Nov 28 2017

SCIENTIST DECLARES THE ANTIGRAVITY SPACE VEHICLES OF THE UNITED STATES ARE MADE WITH EXTRATERRESTRIAL

TECHNOLOGY

Dr. Richard Boylan, Ph.D. Behavioral Scientist, anthropologist, associate professor, clinical

hypnotherapist, consultant, and researcher, claims to have worked for over 15 years with

people reporting having found intelligent extraterrestrial life forms.

He also says the government is aware of these extraterrestrial visitors.

Boylan claims to know about exotic artifacts (military aircraft with extraterrestrial technology)

built on reverse engineering (retro-engineering) that have antigravity technology.

The scientist also claims that he knows 12 of these aircraft built with alien technology,

then giving names and details.

It also provides key data about the contact between humans and stellar visitors, all silenced

by the global protection system.

"Scientifically and clinically, I have been working for over 15 years with people who

report having found an intelligent extraterrestrial life form, a visiting star," said Boylan.

"During this work, I felt that it was necessary to learn as much as possible about the real

UFO reality and what the government already knew about those visitors.

Because of the abundant information about the visitors of the stars and their meetings

with humans, I began publishing my results, making presentations at national and international

congresses, magazines and special media interviews, which in turn has attracted the attention

of some figures, now or before, to highly ranked government sectors, military institutions

and intelligence agencies."

For more infomation >> SCIENTIST DECLARES THE ANTIGRAVITY SPACE VEHICLES OF THE UNITED STATES ARE MADE WITH EXTRATERRESTRIA - Duration: 2:09.

-------------------------------------------

Carpenter v. United States [SCOTUSbrief] - Duration: 3:51.

There were a sequence of robberies in metro Detroit, Michigan and Northern Ohio, and the

police arrested some people, one of whom gave the phone number belonging to Mr. Carpenter.

As it happened, when they requested the records from T-Mobile and MetroPCS, two cell phone

companies, those records revealed that Mr. Carpenter was in the vicinity of the banks

that had been robbed.

And on that basis, they are convicted.

And now, Carpenter challenges police acquisition of that evidence of those location records

as a fourth amendment violation.

The word "privacy" doesn't actually appear in the Constitution.

However, there are certain rights that we have that we now consider to be privacy rights.

The fourth amendment, which is at issue in this Carpenter case is one of them because

the fourth amendment says that people have the right to be free from unreasonable searches

and seizures without a warrant.

The government can't just go into your home and ransack it in, in a fishing expedition

to look for crimes.

And as technology has developed, those protections have evolved.

The Supreme Court has held that if you disclose certain data or information to a third party,

like your bank, like the phone company, then that information is no longer private and

no longer protected by the fourth amendment.

The Stored Communications Act of 1986 allows phone companies to disclose records when the

government provides them with specific and articulable facts showing that there are reasonable

grounds to believe that the records are relevant and material to an ongoing criminal investigation.

And so if the police or the FBI ask that record keeper, then they can get that without a warrant.

So here, in the Carpenter case, the government simply asked the cell providers for that historical

cell location data, and Mr. Carpenter says, "That violates the fourth amendment, even

if it complies with that Federal Statute, the government really should get a warrant."

Carpenter's strongest argument is that he still has a privacy interest in the data that

he provides to his cell phone company.

It's not that he decides that, "Well, I don't care who knows about where I am based on my

cell phone information," it's that he knows that in the modern world, you can't really

go about your business, or at least not have a smartphone, without releasing this data

to your cell phone company.

And therefore, the government ought to have probable cause, ought to have a warrant in,

in order to search it, not less than it would need a warrant to search your day planner

or your phone call.

The best argument for the United States is that under the third-party doctrine, information

that you reveal to third parties is, in effect, public.

That police do not need a warrant, uh, should not need a warrant to look at it, to seize

it, to search it.

This case will establish the basic law of digital privacy going forward.

The amount of data that people now put on their phone is, uh, is mind-boggling.

Think about it.

Our health records are on our phone, our bank data records, our text messages with our closest

friends and neighbors, and paramours, and spouses, and other romantic partners. Photographs,

music, diaries, Facebook, Twitter account.

So, this little device has the potential of revolutionizing constitutional jurisprudence

about privacy rights simply because we have so much private or sensitive material on it.

For more infomation >> Carpenter v. United States [SCOTUSbrief] - Duration: 3:51.

-------------------------------------------

Why did the United States so Enthusiastically Support the Yeltsin Administration? - Duration: 5:36.

PAUL JAY: Welcome to The Real News Network.

I'm Paul Jay, now joining us is Larry Wilkerson.

Thanks for joining us again, Larry.

LARRY WILKERSON: Good to be here, Paul.

PAUL JAY: Okay, let's do it.

Here's a question from Alfonso Fernandes: Why did the United States so enthusiastically

support the Yeltsin administration during the worst of what he calls its atrocities?

LARRY WILKERSON: That's a long, long answer that I don't know everything about.

What I do know about it is that when Yeltsin literally emulated Lenin and stood on or in

front of that tank, and we made a decision not to join the generals, not to overthrow

him, but to back him and to make sure everyone knew that, including those generals, and Yeltsin

then put down the coup attempt and then became at least the titular at that time if not eventually

the leader of a newly collapsed Soviet empire, now Russia, losing everything as fast as it

could, I'll never forget how fast the Warsaw Pact fell apart, that we didn't have a whole

lot of choice, except as George H.W. Bush spoke it at the time.

Jim Baker carried this out to a letter.

That was essentially, "We are not going to exploit this.

We're not going to take advantage of it.

We're not going to do anything to stick our fingers in Soviet Russian eyes.

We're going to do as much as we can to support the leadership, although we know it drinks

a bottle of vodka about every hour.

We're going to do everything we can to take this situation turn out peacefully," to include

inviting Russia to be an observer of NATO, with every expectation it would eventually

probably be asked to be a member of NATO, including when we reunified Germany and kept

it in NATO, the most incredible diplomatic achievement of the latter 20th century, saying

to Moscow, "If you accept this, we'll not move NATO one inch further east."

Then along came Bill Clinton, of course, and moved it all the way to Georgia or almost.

Those were troubled times, but I think H.W. Bush handled it extremely well, and Jim Baker,

and all the rest of that administration.

I think they handled it extremely well.

Brent Scowcroft was right there in the middle of it.

Then along came Bill Clinton and a very inexperienced team.

I was there.

I was still working for the chairman of the Joint Chiefs in the first year of Clinton.

The most inexperienced team I've ever seen.

Couldn't find their ass in a windstorm that first year, indeed for the first 18 months.

Everything went to heck, as we enlarged NATO, largely to sell F-16s and other arms to more

and more countries, and make Lockheed and Boeing and everybody else much richer, and

largely to, in very apoplectic terms, stick our fingers in Moscow's eyes.

We did it in the Balkans.

We embarrassed Boris Yeltsin majorly in the Balkans.

We had Major General Sir Michael Jackson I think it was Pristina in Kosovo, being ordered

by Wes Clark to stop the Russian paratroopers.

Jackson had the good sense to say back, "I'm not about to start World War Three, general."

These were troubled times with inexperienced people dealing with them.

We made a mess of things, and we've been making a mess of things ever since.

PAUL JAY: We were talking a little earlier about Putin's motivation in Kosovo and otherwise.

Is it true for Russia, and for the United States, that to a large extent this is all

about domestic politics?

Maybe that's true with most foreign policy.

It starts with domestic politics.

Certainly in the United States, this seems to be more about domestic politics than any

real concern about what Russia's doing in various places.

LARRY WILKERSON: I think the Russian foreign minister, when Trump failed to certify to

the U.S. Congress that Iran was still in compliance with the nuclear agreement, the German foreign

minister said, "This is all domestic politics.

It's become a plaything of domestic politics."

I think he used the word I think, or it is apparently, or something like that, but he

summed it up.

You're right.

One of the elements of my framework of analysis for my students in determining why certain

national security decisions were made is domestic politics.

I will tell you that we look at both the United States and whomever it happens to be, Chile

in 1968, Iran in 1953, Guatemala in 1954, and so forth, we look at them too from the

point of view of politics.

I can say with some accuracy, I think, that domestic politics drives democracies nuts

far more than it does totalitarian states.

In the case of the United States of America, with our rather unwieldy democracy, it really

does impact foreign and security policy, sometimes in very, very injurious ways.

For more infomation >> Why did the United States so Enthusiastically Support the Yeltsin Administration? - Duration: 5:36.

-------------------------------------------

'Wreaths Across America,' Wreath Laying Ceremonies All Across the United States of America - Duration: 4:54.

♪

♪

>>> WE MADE THE COMMENT EARLIER

THIS MONTH, I THINK YOU SAID

IT, JIMMY, THAT HONORING OUR

VETERANS SHOULD NOT BE LIMITED

TO ONE DAY BUT IS SOMETHING WE

SHOULD DO ALL THE TIME WHICH IS

WHY IT BRINGS US GREAT JOY TO

BRING YOU THE NEXT STORY.

>> WE ARE TALKING ABOUT

VETERANS WHO MADE THE ULTIMATE

SACRIFICE, THOSE WHO DIED FOR

THE COUNTRY.

NEXT MONTH INCREDIBLE CONVOY

WILL ROLL QUITE LITERALLY INTO

SALISBURY TO PAY HOMAGE TO OUR

FALLEN VETERANS AS PART OF

WREATHS ACROSS AMERICA.

JOINING US THIS AFTERNOON IS

THE PRODUCER AND DIRECTOR OF

TRANSPORTATION, TIM AND DEPUTY

TRUCK DRIVER KEITH CLARK.

>> THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU.

>> KEITH, RIGHT OFF THE BAT,

THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR

SERVICE.

>> THANK YOU.

THANK YOU .

>> WHAT DID YOU DO, KEITH?

>> IN THE AIR FORCE?

>> YES.

FOR THE F-16S, THE AVIONICS

SHOP.

>> REALLY?

>> WOW.

>> WE COULD CHANGE THE WHOLE

INTERVIEW!

[LAUGHTER]

>> IS RIGHT THERE WE COULD!

>> BUT WE WANT TO TALK ABOUT

443-880-9116.

WHAT IS THAT?

>> NO, IN 1992, THE WORCESTER

WREATH COMPANY UP INHERENT IN

MAINE DECIDED TO TAKESOME

LEFTOVER WREATHS THEY HAD AND

DONATE THEM TO ARLINGTON .

IN THE FOLLOWING YEAR THEY DID

IT AGAIN.

AND IT WAS LIKE A SNOWBALL

EFFECT.

IT JUST GOT BIGGER AND BIGGER

AND BIGGER.

>> AND FOR YEARS YOU BEEN PART

OF THE DRIVE TO GET THE RACE TO

ARLINGTON?

>> UH-HUH.

>> ONLY THIS YEAR THEY WILL

MAKE A STOP ON THE WAY HERE IN

SALISBURY?

>> YES.

CONVOY WILL BE IN AROUND 2:30

IN THE AFTERNOON.

WE ARE HOPING EVERYONE WILL

COME OUT FOR THAT.

AND THE CEREMONY BEGINS AT

3:00.

>> SO, KEITH, IS A DRIVER, WHAT

IS YOUR ROLE IN 443-880-9116?

>> WELL, THIS ROLE I WILL

PARTICIPATE IN THE WREATHLAYING

CEREMONY AT THE WAR VETERANS

MEMORIAL AND ON THE 16TH I WILL

DELIVER A LOAD OF WREATHS INTO

ARLINGTON CEMETERY FOR THE

NATIONAL EVENT THERE AT 8:00.

>> GOODNESS.

>> YES.

>> NOW, TIM, THIS IS NOT THE

FIRST TIME YOU GUYS HAVE

PARTICIPATED IN THIS EVENT?

>> NO, IT IS THE 11TH YEAR.

WE'VE ACTUALLY DELIVERED ABOUT

150,000 RATES IN THE LAST 11

YEARS IT CONTINUES TO GROW.

OUR DRIVERS LOVE TO DO IT.

PURDUE GLOVES SPONSOR THEM AS

WELL.

>> WHY?

>> IT IS JUST A WAY TO GET BACK

TO THE COMMUNITY AND OUR

VETERANS.

WE HAVE A LOT OF VETERANS AT

PURDUE AND A LOT OF OUR DRIVERS

ARE VETERANS.

AND IT IS JUST A GREAT WAY TO,

YOU KNOW, PAY HOMAGE TO OUR

FALLEN AND GIVE THEM THE

RESPECT.

I COME FROM A MILITARY

BACKGROUND AND I UNDERSTAND

WHETHER SACRIFICE WAS.

>> RIGHT.

>> AND IT IS JUST THE RIGHT

THING TO DO.

>> AND THIS REALLY MEANS A LOT

TO THE FAMILIES AS WELL,

DOESN'T IT?

>> ABSOLUTELY.

LAST YEAR WAS HER VIRGINITY DO

I WICOMICO COUNTY WAR MEMORIAL

AND THE DRIVER DID ALL OF THE

TALKING, THE FAMILIES WERE

INVITED, A GREAT EVENT.

>> NOW, IS THERE ANYTHING THAT

THE COMMUNITY CAN DO

PARTICIPATE AND CONTRIBUTE AND

HELP?

>> ESPECIALLY AS HE SAID, THE

CONVOY WILL BE THERE AT 2:30

AND WE WOULD LOVE TO HAVE THE

COMMUNITY AND PUBLISHER OF

THEIR BEFORE THE CEREMONY

HAPPENS TO SUPPORT THE EVENT

AND ALSO, THEY CAN VOLUNTEER AS

WELL AT THE CEMETERY TO A RACE

ON THE FALLEN CEMETERIES.

AT ANY ARLINGTON NATIONAL

CEMETERY AROUND THE COUNTRY.

>> IN HERE IS THE INFORMATION.

THURSDAY, DECEMBER 15 AT THE

WICOMICO COUNTY WAR VETERANS

MEMORIAL IT OF COURSE, THE

PUBLIC IS INVITED.

IN THE WICOMICO COUNTY WAR

MEMORIAL FOR THOSE WHO ARE NOT

FAMILIAR, WHAT IS IT?

>> THERE IS 191 HEROES ON THE

WALL THERE FROM HERE ON

DELMARVA.

SO WE HAVE SOME GOLDSTAR

FAMILIES HERE ON DELMARVA.

WE HOPE THAT THEY SHOW UP AT

THE WHOLE COMMUNITY COMES OUT

TO SUPPORT THEM AND REMEMBERS

HER LOVED ONE.

>> AND AS YOU WERE SAYING, IT

STARTS AT THREE.

GET THERE EARLY?

>> YES, THE CONVOY WILL COME

INTO: 30, 2:45.

THEY WILL GET THERE A LITTLE

EARLY.

THE GOLD STAR MOMS WILL BE

THERE TRAVELING IN THE CONVOY,

SO IT WILL BE NICE.

>> AND, WHAT A WONDERFUL

OPPORTUNITY TO ACTUALLY TALK TO

THE FAMILY MEMBERS, THE

GOLDSTAR FAMILIES.

>> ABSOLUTELY.

A FEW YEARS AGO I TRAVELED FROM

THE CONVOY FROM HARRINGTON INTO

ARLINGTON AND I SPENT THE WHOLE

TIME WITH THE GOLD STAR MOMS

AND WHEN YOU HEAR THOSE

FAMILIES YOU KNOW WHAT IT IS

ABOUT.

>> AND WE DO TALK ABOUT

For more infomation >> 'Wreaths Across America,' Wreath Laying Ceremonies All Across the United States of America - Duration: 4:54.

-------------------------------------------

Here's How Tiffany Is Doing In The States - Duration: 1:57.

Here's How Tiffany Is Doing In The States

Since her contract with S.M.

Entertainment recently expired, Tiffany has been away and fans have wondered what shes been up to. .

Luckily, updates on her personal Instagram account seem to give fans a glimpse of her daily activities.

Tiffany is presently in California where she was seen walking down the beach in a red dress—camera in hand and smiling brightly.

She even gave fans a look behind the scenes of her upcoming pictorial, showing a glimpse of her true, bubbly personality.

Tiffany left the agency after her contract expired last month and flew back to the United States.

She is preparing for possible promotions overseas and is studying acting and music.

Some worry that Tiffanys US activities herald Girls Generations disbandment, but S.M.

Entertainment has remained relatively tight-lipped on the subject, stating the girls will discuss future activities as a group with each other.

[★TRENDING] Tiffanys Contract with SM Expires, Will Pursue Career In USA.

Source: Dispatch.