Thứ Bảy, 1 tháng 9, 2018

News on Youtube Sep 1 2018

I love a good romantic comedy.

The unforgettable meat cutes,

public declarations of love,

and of course,

the happily ever afters.

But where are these people?

Rom-coms are notorious for

promoting unrealistic relationship expectations

because real-life relationships just can't compete.

Sure, real relationships have their fair share of romantic moments–

just not nearly as just not nearly as many perfectly timed ones

like we see on the big screen.

In short, It's totally possible to love romantic comedies

without it influencing your real relationships,

and I'm gonna tell you how to do it.

The first rom-com-inspired expectation we've got to debunk is:

love at first sight.

We've seen it a thousand times

and I get it.

A movie is roughly 2 hours,

so writers only have so much time to tell a full of story.

Having the protagonists fall in love at first sight helps get straight to the action.

But as anyone who's been on a dating app can tell you,

that's not really love, but lust at first sight.

Here's what you should do instead.

Recognize these sudden feelings

for what they are and nothing more.

Real love takes time to grow and develop.

Give it that time.

Number two: Real love must be proven through grand romantic gestures.

Grand gestures are what make these movies so exciting.

I mean, who doesn't swoon when 'The Notebook's Noah builds a dream home for Allie

or when Lloyd blasts 'In Your Eyes' at the end of 'Say Anything'?

But in real life, a grand romantic gesture can fail miserably

or even come off as creepy.

Instead, celebrate the little things.

Every day is filled with small opportunities to show

your partner you love them.

Something as simple as breakfast in bed

or even just a sweet text goes a long way.

Number three: When someone says they're not interested,

they just need to be won over.

"Can't Buy Me Love,"

"10 Things I Hate About You",

"Superbad"

the list is unending.

This classic nerdy guy gets the popular girl trope

encourages viewers to root for the underdog.

But in real life — pressuring someone to fall for you just doesn't fly.

Instead, take them at their word, and move on.

Wouldn't you rather date someone who's just as into you as you are into them anyway?

That person is out there, so it's best to put your romantic energy into finding them.

Number four: You'll find someone who "completes you."

Holy "Jerry Maguire" does this one come up a lot.

Rom-coms promote the idea that after you find "The One",

nothing else really matters.

Movie characters will totally uproot

their lives if it means they can be with their person.

After all, who needs a fulfilling and satisfying career when you have love?

Answer: everyone.

Instead, be with someone who complements you,

not completes you.

It's important to maintain individual interest and personal relationships

outside of your romance.

And finally, once you're in a relationship,

everything is perfect.

Romantic comedies traditionally

end at the beginning of the protagonists relationship

because viewers want to see them live happily ever after.

But life goes on after you finally get the girl or the guy.

Instead, go into a new relationship knowing you're gonna have fights

because your partner's not a mind reader

and surprise, surprise, neither are you.

There will be days where you and your partner might not like each other,

but that doesn't mean you won't still love each other.

Ultimately, entering a relationship with fewer expectations

can create more opportunities to be grateful

for the small, everyday moments that make up

your love story.

That's all I have for you this week.

Tune in next time.

Love, Lindsay.

For more infomation >> 5 Unrealistic Relationship Expectations We Learned From Romantic Comedy - Duration: 4:31.

-------------------------------------------

GBI: Former cop accused of having sexual relationship with underage girl - Duration: 0:24.

For more infomation >> GBI: Former cop accused of having sexual relationship with underage girl - Duration: 0:24.

-------------------------------------------

Relationship এবং বিবাহ আগে এটি জেনে রাখুন || Happy and Successful Relationship in life. - Duration: 4:34.

For more infomation >> Relationship এবং বিবাহ আগে এটি জেনে রাখুন || Happy and Successful Relationship in life. - Duration: 4:34.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump's contentious relationship with the media - Duration: 18:08.

ROBERT COSTA: Hello. I'm Robert Costa. And this is the Washington Week Extra, where we

pick up online where we left off on our broadcast.

Joining me around the table, Yamiche Alcindor of the PBS NewsHour, Erica Werner of The

Washington Post, Julie Hirschfeld Davis of The New York Times, and Mark Landler of The

New York Times. Two big primaries this week. In Arizona, Representative Martha McSally

won the Republican nomination to replace retiring Senator Jeff Flake. McSally retired

from the U.S. Air Force after serving two decades there and the was the first female

fighter pilot to fly in combat. She'll face Democrat Kyrsten Sinema, a member of

Congress, in the fall. And in Florida, one of the country's largest swing states,

Tallahassee Mayor and Senator Bernie Sanders-backed Andrew Gillum, he was the winner

in the Democratic primary for governor.

Representative Ron DeSantis, backed by President Donald Trump, won the Republican

nomination, but DeSantis quickly stirred up controversy in comments on Fox News.

REPRESENTATIVE RON DESANTIS (R-FL): (From video.) He is an articulate spokesman for

those far-left views and he's a charismatic candidate. And, you know, I watched those

Democrat debates; none of that was my cup of tea, but I mean, he performed better than the

other people there, so. The last thing we need to do is to monkey this up by trying to

embrace a socialist agenda with huge tax increases and bankrupting the state.

ROBERT COSTA: DeSantis denied his comments were racially motivated.

Yamiche, we don't know, as David Brooks said on the NewsHour, what's in the congressman's

heart, but to have race immediately injected into this gubernatorial contest, what does

it tell us about the midterms this year?

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: Well, I'll say one thing. There's - race was already included in

this because Florida's never had a black governor, so there is this idea that we were

going to be talking about race anyways because he was already - Andrew Gillum is the

first black Democrat nominated for governorship. So that was going to be there.

I think race is also a big thing because I'm from Florida; there's a big racial divide

between South Florida, where I grew up, which is really I would say the Caribbean there's

so many immigrants there, and the rest of Florida which is majority-white and very much

more like the South. That said, when you talk about a black man who's educated and you

say the word "articulate," you say that he performs well, and then you follow it up by

saying the word "monkey," you should know better. If he didn't know better, he should

absolutely have known better. The moment I heard it, especially the way that he said

"monkey," I thought - I sat back in my chair and thought this is so problematic.

So I think that he really needs to own up to the fact that that was something that he

shouldn't have said. He needs to apologize for saying it. And the fact that Fox News

came out and said we apologize, that we are not part of this, that's something - that's a

really big move for Fox News, which of course has had its own issues with racially-charged language.

ROBERT COSTA: Gillum backed by Senator Sanders.

Are we seeing the Democratic Party move a little left in the months ahead of November?

ERICA WERNER: Yeah, really interesting outcome in that both parties kind of showed, you

know, the - what they are in this political season as far as the Republican side, you get

the guy who Trump backed and pulled from behind in the polls to winning, showing, you

know, how Trump is the kingmaker in these primaries. And then on the Democratic side,

as in New York with Joe Crowley's seat, you see that a progressive can overcome polling

and expectations and win. And so it's going to be really interesting to see what happens

when these two face off in the general election and it'll be very telling as to what

direction Florida and maybe even in the country wants to go.

ROBERT COSTA: Trump does seem to be the kingmaker on the Republican side, but Arizona's

a little different. Martha McSally was at first wary of attaching too close to Trump,

but by the end it was all about Trump, and you saw that in Florida with DeSantis.

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS: Absolutely. I mean, as Erica said, he endorsed DeSantis.

He didn't endorse in the three-way primary in Arizona, but all three of the candidates -

all three of the Republican candidates hugged Trump as hard as they could, even in the

week after John McCain's death, and he was a Navy pilot, war hero.

You might think a candidate like McSally would want to associate herself with him, try

to, you know, draw in some of the voters who kept on sending him back to the Senate from

Arizona, but she didn't mention him at all. She talked about being a supporter of

President Trump's agenda. And of course, Joe Arpaio was - you know, he called Trump

more of a hero than McCain because he was on the receiving end of a pardon from him.

And so the candidates really, I think, have embraced this idea that if you want to win a

primary you really have to hug Trump hard.

The question is really going to be, I think, in the next couple months, whether that gets

you over the finish line of a general election when you have a lot of voters who are

repelled by the idea of Donald Trump - certainly Democrats, but even some independents

and some of the Republicans who may have supported him in 2016.

So it'll be interesting to see how those numbers may change, or maybe they will not.

ROBERT COSTA: Why aren't the Democrats talking about impeachment as much as we may have

thought months ago, that there will be this big push against President Trump?

And of course, some of the elements of the party are doing that - Tom Steyer, the

billionaire donor, leading an impeachment push - but a lot of the Sanders wing seems to

actually be pushing for other issues: a higher minimum wage, more economic and health

emphasis in their - in their call.

MARK LANDLER: Well, there's - a lot of Democrats feel that impeachment's a distraction

and ultimately you need to be talking about issues people care about.

I think, though, that - to talk about these new Washington Post poll numbers that show

this relatively high number of people that are open to impeachment, that regardless of

what the party leadership - whether you're on the progressive end or the establishment,

regardless of how reluctant they feel about impeachment, I think they're going to find it

a very tough pressure to tamp down. I think there is enough fervor out in the

grassroots to push impeachment that, should they take the House, I think they'll

face enormous pressure not to - not just to hold hearings, but to act on those hearings.

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: And I'll say, in talking to voters after Andrew Gillum won - and even

though this, obviously, is a governor's race - there were so many people that said, well,

as soon as the Democrats can just get the House back we'll impeach President Trump.

So in some ways I wonder if these candidates know that their voters know what the deal is

and that there's an elephant in the room, that they don't have to say we're going to

impeach President Trump because with all the reporting that Axios did this week, with

that long list of investigations, some of the stuff I forgot was things that we did know:

Where's the president's tax returns? Why did he fire James Comey? There are all

these things that Democrats want to know. So even if they don't impeach him, all

these investigations could end up becoming an impeachment process in and of itself.

So I think Democrats are smart to say, hey, Hillary Clinton won on an - or Hillary

Clinton lost running against just Trump, saying I am not going to be Trump; maybe what we

need to do is actually have a Democratic agenda so that years down the line, when we

don't have President Trump, we can still say, hey, this is what our party stands for.

ROBERT COSTA: When you look at President Trump's schedule, he's going to be a lot of

places but he can't be everywhere. And there was a POLITICO report this week that said

that now the National Republican Congressional Committee, the campaign arm of the GOP

in the House, they're going to have to make some tough decisions because Republicans

still face that blue wave even if President Trump's helpful in a lot of places.

ERICA WERNER: Yeah, there is the suggestion that, you know, as far as the money spigot

for Republican candidates, you have 23-seat majority currently and maybe 45 Republicans

who are quite vulnerable. Well, the party can't lift all those people up, so they're

starting to talk about who do we cut off because they're just not going to make it.

Those are going to be difficult decisions, obviously, but necessary.

I mean, it's all about survival and it's about keeping the majority for Republicans

because in the House, if you have the majority, even if it's a one-seat majority, I mean,

it's going to be incredibly difficult to get anything passed, but you control all the

gavels, and that's really going to be what matters to the Trump administration.

ROBERT COSTA: And Trump can go to a big rally, but who are they sending to the suburbs

from the White House, Ivanka Trump?

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS: Well, that's a great question because, you know, we just saw

President Trump tweeted that he was going to have a big rally in October for Ted Cruz in

Texas, who is facing a rising Democratic challenger in Beto O'Rourke. And he said, you

know, I want to rent the biggest arena I can. He loves these big arena rallies.

That's what gets him going. That's what makes him feel like he's needed and like he

is the star, which is what he wants out of these events, and it's also what

Republican candidates want out of these events, but it is a good question.

Some of these more vulnerable Republicans really need him to come to their little small

high school on the outskirts of the city where they really need to get voters excited to

come out and vote for them in November, and he is not going to want to play those places.

The few times when we've seen him go to venues like that he makes comments publicly about

how I never go someplace this small, and so, you know, to get him where he needs to be to

help Republicans get across the finish line is going to be a challenge.

Maybe it will be Ivanka Trump or Mike Pence, or who knows.

ROBERT COSTA: Mike Pence seems to take a lot of those gigs.

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS: Mike Pence does do a lot - a lot of those gigs.

(Laughter.) He's going to be a busy man.

ROBERT COSTA: That's true. I mean, he was at the Capitol for Senator McCain.

I mean, it's almost like a rock band when they say we won't play clubs anymore, we're

only going to play arenas. (Laughter.)

Speaking of rallies, at a political rally in Indiana on Thursday, President Trump

repeated one of his common themes, calling the mainstream media "fake news." Mr.

Trump has had a contentious relationship with the press - that's not news, of course -

but he's been singling out news organizations and whipping up crowds at his rallies for

over a year now and even before then during the campaign. But it's reached a new level.

The Boston Globe spearheaded a series of editorials nationwide speaking out on behalf of

a free press earlier this month. And this week, a man was accused of calling The Globe

the enemy of the people and he was charged with threatening violence against the

newspaper and its journalists. Mark, you've - I mean, we've all been at rallies, but you've

been recently covering the president. And so have you, Julie, I know, and everybody has.

When you hear about the threat to The Globe, the shots from the president, the punches

at the press, expected. But the violence that seems to be creeping into some

of these attacks on the fringe, it's unsettling to say the least.

MARK LANDLER: It is. And, you know, one of the things that has developed over time in

President Trump's campaign against the press is he started off with the phrase

"fake news," which is derisive and I think inaccurate and offensive to all of us.

But it's not the same as what he has more recently taken to saying, which is "the enemy

of the people." That's a really loaded phrase. It has, you know, a deep historical

provenance. It was used in totalitarian states and Stalinist Russia, in Nazi Germany.

And when you label any group the enemy of the state, you're really declaring them, to

some extent, open season, that they are a group that can be victimized. I don't know

whether President Trump has that historical perspective or that sensitivity.

I do know that members of the press, including the publisher of my newspaper, have

personally asked the president, appealed to the president not to use that phrase and that

language. But he persists, as recently as this week he tweeted it yet again.

So when you see episodes like the threats against The Boston Globe or the mass shooting

at the Annapolis newspaper, which, you know, to be sure was not in any way connected to a

Trump supporter, it's happening within a context, within an atmosphere and an environment

that the president is really contributing to creating.

And so this language, the continued use of this language does trouble me.

And, you know, one of the interesting nuggets that came out of our publisher's visit

with the president several weeks ago was that he mentioned to the president that

newsrooms around the country were beginning to hire armed guards to guard the newsrooms.

And President Trump's response to my publisher was to say I'm surprised they weren't

doing that already, so, you know, sometimes you wonder how much the president thinks

these issues through.

But this type of language in particular is so incendiary that I think that's, you know,

one of the contributing factors and something that I hope we will see less of over time.

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: I went to a Trump rally in Charleston, West Virginia.

And I started - I end up - I ended up interviewing people about Jim Acosta because so

many people were yelling and screaming about him in particular.

And it got to the point where I kind of got concerned. And I'm someone who covered

Ferguson, who covers Baltimore protests, who doesn't really get rattled.

I've never really gotten rattled at a Trump rally in all the times I went on campaigns,

and that's speaking as an African-American woman where there were sometimes white

nationalists there. Never had a problem. But the level of anger that I got and

that I received when I - when I was watching people yell at Jim Acosta made me pause.

And people were saying, well, he's the fake news and he wants to let - he wants this

president to go. And it made me think that if Robert Mueller does come out with the

report and it does say this president broke the law, that he obstructed justice and

then we start reporting on that, I don't know how people are going to take that.

I don't know if they're going to be able to receive the evidence if there is evidence

that this president did something wrong. And that, to me, is the thing that worries me.

Yes, it's the media aspect of it, but it's also we're pushing out facts and if you don't

like those facts, I don't know how people would - how people might lash out.

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS: Well, and that is the point - YAMICHE ALCINDOR: Right.

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS: - right, I mean, from the president's perspective.

I don't know, like Mark said, whether he has a historical perspective of these terms that

he's using and if he's trying to incite this kind of feeling.

But I think he does very well understand the result and he has a desired result which is

for people to say everything we're reading, everything we're seeing on the news, with the

exception of Fox News, is wrong, is discredited, is fake, is meant to bring somebody

down. And it is actually quite frightening to think of the prospect that something like that

would happen, we would all report it, and, you know, would there be some sort of an

uprising? Would people feel enabled by the president's rhetoric to really take

action rather than just talk about how much they hate the media?

ROBERT COSTA: And it's about information generally. You think about the president's attacks

are on the media - against the media, but also against Google and social media companies.

ERICA WERNER: That's right and kind of against experts of all kinds, right?

Scientists, you know, university professors, that sort of thing.

And unfortunately, it's been effective based on polling that shows that - and I don't

remember the numbers, but the standing in which journalists are held has sunk and there's

more than a majority, I believe, of people who think that we do make up stories and that

we do fabricate sources, which, of course, we don't. So it really is quite troubling.

And I believe the president has in fact acknowledged that this is what he's trying to do,

right, to make it so that he is the one who's believed and that no one else is believed.

And I think Yamiche is right, that when the time comes for Bob Mueller to say whatever

it is he has to say, however damning or not that turns out to be of the president, we'll

report it, a lot of people won't believe it unfortunately.

ROBERT COSTA: Well, that's the question I'm always asking myself and my colleagues is,

what are we supposed to be doing?

Because if that happens, right, if there is a new breaking point in the media where

people are questioning the press and there's real attacks on the press, part of my

reaction is just keep reporting, just keep telling the story. But is there anything

else we should be doing or thinking about as journalists? I don't know.

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: I think it's always reporting and it's always respecting people.

It's really trying to bring people and show people what you do. The idea is that I

always think that no one - no one owes me an interview, no one owes me time in their home.

So when I go and I talk to people, I've always had a pretty pleasant experience and I

would say that at Trump rallies.

I wrote a story about people who voted for Obama and then voted for President Trump, and

this was before the election where things were very, very high and people were very

angry. And again, I'm an African-American woman with an afro walking through a Trump

rally saying, who voted for Obama? That's a kind of tough thing to do.

People were pleasant to me because I was pleasant to them.

So I think that if you meet enough people like that and you report the facts, that's all

you can really do because I can't convince you if Robert Mueller comes out either for or

against it because there could be Democrats that are very mad.

If Robert Mueller says, actually, everything the president did was fine, there was no

evidence of wrongdoing, we don't know what people might do on the other side.

People might be very, very angry.

If the Republicans keep the House and Robert Mueller says the president's cleared, there

could be a whole other side of the country that says can we really do another two years

and what that could mean. So I think people - I think as journalists, our jobs are

just to report and be respectful to people.

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS: Yeah, I mean, I think you have to continue to report the ways in

which the president is attacking these issues. Right?

I mean, the fact that he is, his behavior when it comes to this investigation, when it

comes to the media is very much similar to what you seen in authoritarian societies, is

an important comparison to make. It's also important to talk to people, as Yamiche

said, all over the country who come from different perspectives in order to, you know,

make it clear that not everyone is singing from the same song sheet, not everyone has

the same perspective. But facts are facts.

And so I think it's really important, even in an environment where we are under constant

attack, that we keep on trying to talk to the primary sources and keep on reporting what

we see. Because the opposite, frankly, is what Donald Trump seems to want and what a

lot of leaders in countries that don't have the freedoms that we have here tend to want.

And, you know, we just have to keep on doing the job.

ROBERT COSTA: We'll leave it there for now. And we'll leave it there for the

Washington Week Extra. Thanks for joining us. And while you're online, check out our

Washington Week-ly News Quiz. I'm Robert Costa. We'll see you next time.

For more infomation >> President Trump's contentious relationship with the media - Duration: 18:08.

-------------------------------------------

President Trump's contentious relationship with the media - Duration: 18:08.

ROBERT COSTA: Hello. I'm Robert Costa. And this is the Washington Week Extra, where we

pick up online where we left off on our broadcast.

Joining me around the table, Yamiche Alcindor of the PBS NewsHour, Erica Werner of The

Washington Post, Julie Hirschfeld Davis of The New York Times, and Mark Landler of The

New York Times. Two big primaries this week. In Arizona, Representative Martha McSally

won the Republican nomination to replace retiring Senator Jeff Flake. McSally retired

from the U.S. Air Force after serving two decades there and the was the first female

fighter pilot to fly in combat. She'll face Democrat Kyrsten Sinema, a member of

Congress, in the fall. And in Florida, one of the country's largest swing states,

Tallahassee Mayor and Senator Bernie Sanders-backed Andrew Gillum, he was the winner

in the Democratic primary for governor.

Representative Ron DeSantis, backed by President Donald Trump, won the Republican

nomination, but DeSantis quickly stirred up controversy in comments on Fox News.

REPRESENTATIVE RON DESANTIS (R-FL): (From video.) He is an articulate spokesman for

those far-left views and he's a charismatic candidate. And, you know, I watched those

Democrat debates; none of that was my cup of tea, but I mean, he performed better than the

other people there, so. The last thing we need to do is to monkey this up by trying to

embrace a socialist agenda with huge tax increases and bankrupting the state.

ROBERT COSTA: DeSantis denied his comments were racially motivated.

Yamiche, we don't know, as David Brooks said on the NewsHour, what's in the congressman's

heart, but to have race immediately injected into this gubernatorial contest, what does

it tell us about the midterms this year?

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: Well, I'll say one thing. There's - race was already included in

this because Florida's never had a black governor, so there is this idea that we were

going to be talking about race anyways because he was already - Andrew Gillum is the

first black Democrat nominated for governorship. So that was going to be there.

I think race is also a big thing because I'm from Florida; there's a big racial divide

between South Florida, where I grew up, which is really I would say the Caribbean there's

so many immigrants there, and the rest of Florida which is majority-white and very much

more like the South. That said, when you talk about a black man who's educated and you

say the word "articulate," you say that he performs well, and then you follow it up by

saying the word "monkey," you should know better. If he didn't know better, he should

absolutely have known better. The moment I heard it, especially the way that he said

"monkey," I thought - I sat back in my chair and thought this is so problematic.

So I think that he really needs to own up to the fact that that was something that he

shouldn't have said. He needs to apologize for saying it. And the fact that Fox News

came out and said we apologize, that we are not part of this, that's something - that's a

really big move for Fox News, which of course has had its own issues with racially-charged language.

ROBERT COSTA: Gillum backed by Senator Sanders.

Are we seeing the Democratic Party move a little left in the months ahead of November?

ERICA WERNER: Yeah, really interesting outcome in that both parties kind of showed, you

know, the - what they are in this political season as far as the Republican side, you get

the guy who Trump backed and pulled from behind in the polls to winning, showing, you

know, how Trump is the kingmaker in these primaries. And then on the Democratic side,

as in New York with Joe Crowley's seat, you see that a progressive can overcome polling

and expectations and win. And so it's going to be really interesting to see what happens

when these two face off in the general election and it'll be very telling as to what

direction Florida and maybe even in the country wants to go.

ROBERT COSTA: Trump does seem to be the kingmaker on the Republican side, but Arizona's

a little different. Martha McSally was at first wary of attaching too close to Trump,

but by the end it was all about Trump, and you saw that in Florida with DeSantis.

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS: Absolutely. I mean, as Erica said, he endorsed DeSantis.

He didn't endorse in the three-way primary in Arizona, but all three of the candidates -

all three of the Republican candidates hugged Trump as hard as they could, even in the

week after John McCain's death, and he was a Navy pilot, war hero.

You might think a candidate like McSally would want to associate herself with him, try

to, you know, draw in some of the voters who kept on sending him back to the Senate from

Arizona, but she didn't mention him at all. She talked about being a supporter of

President Trump's agenda. And of course, Joe Arpaio was - you know, he called Trump

more of a hero than McCain because he was on the receiving end of a pardon from him.

And so the candidates really, I think, have embraced this idea that if you want to win a

primary you really have to hug Trump hard.

The question is really going to be, I think, in the next couple months, whether that gets

you over the finish line of a general election when you have a lot of voters who are

repelled by the idea of Donald Trump - certainly Democrats, but even some independents

and some of the Republicans who may have supported him in 2016.

So it'll be interesting to see how those numbers may change, or maybe they will not.

ROBERT COSTA: Why aren't the Democrats talking about impeachment as much as we may have

thought months ago, that there will be this big push against President Trump?

And of course, some of the elements of the party are doing that - Tom Steyer, the

billionaire donor, leading an impeachment push - but a lot of the Sanders wing seems to

actually be pushing for other issues: a higher minimum wage, more economic and health

emphasis in their - in their call.

MARK LANDLER: Well, there's - a lot of Democrats feel that impeachment's a distraction

and ultimately you need to be talking about issues people care about.

I think, though, that - to talk about these new Washington Post poll numbers that show

this relatively high number of people that are open to impeachment, that regardless of

what the party leadership - whether you're on the progressive end or the establishment,

regardless of how reluctant they feel about impeachment, I think they're going to find it

a very tough pressure to tamp down. I think there is enough fervor out in the

grassroots to push impeachment that, should they take the House, I think they'll

face enormous pressure not to - not just to hold hearings, but to act on those hearings.

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: And I'll say, in talking to voters after Andrew Gillum won - and even

though this, obviously, is a governor's race - there were so many people that said, well,

as soon as the Democrats can just get the House back we'll impeach President Trump.

So in some ways I wonder if these candidates know that their voters know what the deal is

and that there's an elephant in the room, that they don't have to say we're going to

impeach President Trump because with all the reporting that Axios did this week, with

that long list of investigations, some of the stuff I forgot was things that we did know:

Where's the president's tax returns? Why did he fire James Comey? There are all

these things that Democrats want to know. So even if they don't impeach him, all

these investigations could end up becoming an impeachment process in and of itself.

So I think Democrats are smart to say, hey, Hillary Clinton won on an - or Hillary

Clinton lost running against just Trump, saying I am not going to be Trump; maybe what we

need to do is actually have a Democratic agenda so that years down the line, when we

don't have President Trump, we can still say, hey, this is what our party stands for.

ROBERT COSTA: When you look at President Trump's schedule, he's going to be a lot of

places but he can't be everywhere. And there was a POLITICO report this week that said

that now the National Republican Congressional Committee, the campaign arm of the GOP

in the House, they're going to have to make some tough decisions because Republicans

still face that blue wave even if President Trump's helpful in a lot of places.

ERICA WERNER: Yeah, there is the suggestion that, you know, as far as the money spigot

for Republican candidates, you have 23-seat majority currently and maybe 45 Republicans

who are quite vulnerable. Well, the party can't lift all those people up, so they're

starting to talk about who do we cut off because they're just not going to make it.

Those are going to be difficult decisions, obviously, but necessary.

I mean, it's all about survival and it's about keeping the majority for Republicans

because in the House, if you have the majority, even if it's a one-seat majority, I mean,

it's going to be incredibly difficult to get anything passed, but you control all the

gavels, and that's really going to be what matters to the Trump administration.

ROBERT COSTA: And Trump can go to a big rally, but who are they sending to the suburbs

from the White House, Ivanka Trump?

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS: Well, that's a great question because, you know, we just saw

President Trump tweeted that he was going to have a big rally in October for Ted Cruz in

Texas, who is facing a rising Democratic challenger in Beto O'Rourke. And he said, you

know, I want to rent the biggest arena I can. He loves these big arena rallies.

That's what gets him going. That's what makes him feel like he's needed and like he

is the star, which is what he wants out of these events, and it's also what

Republican candidates want out of these events, but it is a good question.

Some of these more vulnerable Republicans really need him to come to their little small

high school on the outskirts of the city where they really need to get voters excited to

come out and vote for them in November, and he is not going to want to play those places.

The few times when we've seen him go to venues like that he makes comments publicly about

how I never go someplace this small, and so, you know, to get him where he needs to be to

help Republicans get across the finish line is going to be a challenge.

Maybe it will be Ivanka Trump or Mike Pence, or who knows.

ROBERT COSTA: Mike Pence seems to take a lot of those gigs.

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS: Mike Pence does do a lot - a lot of those gigs.

(Laughter.) He's going to be a busy man.

ROBERT COSTA: That's true. I mean, he was at the Capitol for Senator McCain.

I mean, it's almost like a rock band when they say we won't play clubs anymore, we're

only going to play arenas. (Laughter.)

Speaking of rallies, at a political rally in Indiana on Thursday, President Trump

repeated one of his common themes, calling the mainstream media "fake news." Mr.

Trump has had a contentious relationship with the press - that's not news, of course -

but he's been singling out news organizations and whipping up crowds at his rallies for

over a year now and even before then during the campaign. But it's reached a new level.

The Boston Globe spearheaded a series of editorials nationwide speaking out on behalf of

a free press earlier this month. And this week, a man was accused of calling The Globe

the enemy of the people and he was charged with threatening violence against the

newspaper and its journalists. Mark, you've - I mean, we've all been at rallies, but you've

been recently covering the president. And so have you, Julie, I know, and everybody has.

When you hear about the threat to The Globe, the shots from the president, the punches

at the press, expected. But the violence that seems to be creeping into some

of these attacks on the fringe, it's unsettling to say the least.

MARK LANDLER: It is. And, you know, one of the things that has developed over time in

President Trump's campaign against the press is he started off with the phrase

"fake news," which is derisive and I think inaccurate and offensive to all of us.

But it's not the same as what he has more recently taken to saying, which is "the enemy

of the people." That's a really loaded phrase. It has, you know, a deep historical

provenance. It was used in totalitarian states and Stalinist Russia, in Nazi Germany.

And when you label any group the enemy of the state, you're really declaring them, to

some extent, open season, that they are a group that can be victimized. I don't know

whether President Trump has that historical perspective or that sensitivity.

I do know that members of the press, including the publisher of my newspaper, have

personally asked the president, appealed to the president not to use that phrase and that

language. But he persists, as recently as this week he tweeted it yet again.

So when you see episodes like the threats against The Boston Globe or the mass shooting

at the Annapolis newspaper, which, you know, to be sure was not in any way connected to a

Trump supporter, it's happening within a context, within an atmosphere and an environment

that the president is really contributing to creating.

And so this language, the continued use of this language does trouble me.

And, you know, one of the interesting nuggets that came out of our publisher's visit

with the president several weeks ago was that he mentioned to the president that

newsrooms around the country were beginning to hire armed guards to guard the newsrooms.

And President Trump's response to my publisher was to say I'm surprised they weren't

doing that already, so, you know, sometimes you wonder how much the president thinks

these issues through.

But this type of language in particular is so incendiary that I think that's, you know,

one of the contributing factors and something that I hope we will see less of over time.

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: I went to a Trump rally in Charleston, West Virginia.

And I started - I end up - I ended up interviewing people about Jim Acosta because so

many people were yelling and screaming about him in particular.

And it got to the point where I kind of got concerned. And I'm someone who covered

Ferguson, who covers Baltimore protests, who doesn't really get rattled.

I've never really gotten rattled at a Trump rally in all the times I went on campaigns,

and that's speaking as an African-American woman where there were sometimes white

nationalists there. Never had a problem. But the level of anger that I got and

that I received when I - when I was watching people yell at Jim Acosta made me pause.

And people were saying, well, he's the fake news and he wants to let - he wants this

president to go. And it made me think that if Robert Mueller does come out with the

report and it does say this president broke the law, that he obstructed justice and

then we start reporting on that, I don't know how people are going to take that.

I don't know if they're going to be able to receive the evidence if there is evidence

that this president did something wrong. And that, to me, is the thing that worries me.

Yes, it's the media aspect of it, but it's also we're pushing out facts and if you don't

like those facts, I don't know how people would - how people might lash out.

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS: Well, and that is the point - YAMICHE ALCINDOR: Right.

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS: - right, I mean, from the president's perspective.

I don't know, like Mark said, whether he has a historical perspective of these terms that

he's using and if he's trying to incite this kind of feeling.

But I think he does very well understand the result and he has a desired result which is

for people to say everything we're reading, everything we're seeing on the news, with the

exception of Fox News, is wrong, is discredited, is fake, is meant to bring somebody

down. And it is actually quite frightening to think of the prospect that something like that

would happen, we would all report it, and, you know, would there be some sort of an

uprising? Would people feel enabled by the president's rhetoric to really take

action rather than just talk about how much they hate the media?

ROBERT COSTA: And it's about information generally. You think about the president's attacks

are on the media - against the media, but also against Google and social media companies.

ERICA WERNER: That's right and kind of against experts of all kinds, right?

Scientists, you know, university professors, that sort of thing.

And unfortunately, it's been effective based on polling that shows that - and I don't

remember the numbers, but the standing in which journalists are held has sunk and there's

more than a majority, I believe, of people who think that we do make up stories and that

we do fabricate sources, which, of course, we don't. So it really is quite troubling.

And I believe the president has in fact acknowledged that this is what he's trying to do,

right, to make it so that he is the one who's believed and that no one else is believed.

And I think Yamiche is right, that when the time comes for Bob Mueller to say whatever

it is he has to say, however damning or not that turns out to be of the president, we'll

report it, a lot of people won't believe it unfortunately.

ROBERT COSTA: Well, that's the question I'm always asking myself and my colleagues is,

what are we supposed to be doing?

Because if that happens, right, if there is a new breaking point in the media where

people are questioning the press and there's real attacks on the press, part of my

reaction is just keep reporting, just keep telling the story. But is there anything

else we should be doing or thinking about as journalists? I don't know.

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: I think it's always reporting and it's always respecting people.

It's really trying to bring people and show people what you do. The idea is that I

always think that no one - no one owes me an interview, no one owes me time in their home.

So when I go and I talk to people, I've always had a pretty pleasant experience and I

would say that at Trump rallies.

I wrote a story about people who voted for Obama and then voted for President Trump, and

this was before the election where things were very, very high and people were very

angry. And again, I'm an African-American woman with an afro walking through a Trump

rally saying, who voted for Obama? That's a kind of tough thing to do.

People were pleasant to me because I was pleasant to them.

So I think that if you meet enough people like that and you report the facts, that's all

you can really do because I can't convince you if Robert Mueller comes out either for or

against it because there could be Democrats that are very mad.

If Robert Mueller says, actually, everything the president did was fine, there was no

evidence of wrongdoing, we don't know what people might do on the other side.

People might be very, very angry.

If the Republicans keep the House and Robert Mueller says the president's cleared, there

could be a whole other side of the country that says can we really do another two years

and what that could mean. So I think people - I think as journalists, our jobs are

just to report and be respectful to people.

JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS: Yeah, I mean, I think you have to continue to report the ways in

which the president is attacking these issues. Right?

I mean, the fact that he is, his behavior when it comes to this investigation, when it

comes to the media is very much similar to what you seen in authoritarian societies, is

an important comparison to make. It's also important to talk to people, as Yamiche

said, all over the country who come from different perspectives in order to, you know,

make it clear that not everyone is singing from the same song sheet, not everyone has

the same perspective. But facts are facts.

And so I think it's really important, even in an environment where we are under constant

attack, that we keep on trying to talk to the primary sources and keep on reporting what

we see. Because the opposite, frankly, is what Donald Trump seems to want and what a

lot of leaders in countries that don't have the freedoms that we have here tend to want.

And, you know, we just have to keep on doing the job.

ROBERT COSTA: We'll leave it there for now. And we'll leave it there for the

Washington Week Extra. Thanks for joining us. And while you're online, check out our

Washington Week-ly News Quiz. I'm Robert Costa. We'll see you next time.

For more infomation >> President Trump's contentious relationship with the media - Duration: 18:08.

-------------------------------------------

Little girl scare Sok force her for grooming | Sok good relationship with her | Monkey Daily 1562 - Duration: 10:16.

For more infomation >> Little girl scare Sok force her for grooming | Sok good relationship with her | Monkey Daily 1562 - Duration: 10:16.

-------------------------------------------

Am I wasting my time in this relationship? [RIG 24] - Duration: 49:17.

Hey there, this is clay with www.ModernLove.Life and this is the relationship inner game experience.

Today we're going to be talking about the topic of how to know if you're wasting your

time with somebody or not.

Oftentimes I get questions from people that, you know, somebody goes onto explain their

situation, the story and all of that, and then they say, do I still have a chance?

Is there still hope?

What are the odds that this will work out?

Or something like that.

And I often looked behind this and I was like, well, what do they want me to say that they

have a 76.4 % chance that this will work out or something.

Like I have some kind of computer in my back room or something that's gonna, you know,

I put in all the info "Oh was a long distance relationship.

There is a rebound person and just do, do, do, do, do" you know, 82 percent chance or

something.

But, but when I really started to look underneath it a little bit more, I realized that people

just want to know if they're wasting their time or not when they are trying to pursue

a relationship with somebody or pursue some sort of connection with somebody.

And I want to get to the bottom of this because this is very important and that is that your

only wasting your time.

If you learn nothing from the experience.

If you have absolutely nothing from the experience, then you are wasting your time.

You know, people often go through things like relationship challenges, dating challenges,

you know, somebody ghosts them, somebody flakes out on them, somebody cheats on them, or even

just like breakups, you know, they want to get back together, but maybe it doesn't work

out for one reason or another.

And they often think, oh, well, you know, I just wasted my time trying to make that

work.

I just wasted my time trying to connect with this person.

I just wasted my time trying to date that person.

And that's a really sad way to go about looking at things.

It's a really sad way to go about looking at life because the truth is everything that

you experience, everything that you encounter, everything that happens to you in your life

is an opportunity to learn something from it.

It's an opportunity to learn something from it and it's an opportunity to gain a lesson

from it that you can take and move into the future, into your future experiences, so maybe

things didn't work out in a previous relationship or you just gonna let that be just a terrible

thing that happened and you're just gonna feel bad for a week or two or something and

then you're going to get out there and start dating again and just do the whole thing all

over again.

Are you going to say, wow, that's something terrible happened.

Let me see.

Like why she cheated on me.

Let me see like why he flaked out on me?

What could I do differently in the future to make sure that that doesn't happen?

Could I be maybe choosing different partners?

Could I be a behaving in a different way when we're together?

Could I be doing this or that?

Right?

If you actually learned something from the process than it is never a wasted experience,

so have that mindset and you won't ever have to worry about this ever again because no

matter what happens to you, you will win.

No matter what happens to you, you will gain valuable lessons.

No matter what happens to you, you will find a way to make success from it.

Okay, so find the lesson in everything that happens and use it to your advantage.

This is something extremely important and I never want you to forget this.

No matter what your relationship situation is, no matter what things happened to you

in dating or relationships moving forward, always find a way to gain something from your

experiences, no matter how good or how bad they are.

Okay?

Now, beyond this, people I know, just want to know, hey, is there even a possibility

that it's going to work out?

You know, is it even a possibility that we're gonna?

Get together and be in a relationship, isn't even a possibility that she likes me, isn't

even a possibility that he wants to be my boyfriend, and the truth of the matter is

beyond just taking a lesson from things that happen to you in your life there, there really

is no way to completely remove risk, to live a life without risk and uncertainty.

There's always going to be a certain degree of uncertainty in life, especially when it

comes to dating, unless of course you just completely opt out of dating and just decide

you're going to not try and just be single.

There's nothing wrong with that, but that is the only way to have certainty when it

comes to dating.

When you are in a relationship with somebody, when you're dating somebody, when you are

in partnership of some kind with somebody, you are inherently uncertain because it doesn't

just involve you.

It also involves another person.

Okay, and that person has their own freewill.

That person can make their own choices.

That person can make their own decisions and so on and so forth.

So as long as you're gaining something from it, as long as you're learning something from

it, you're going to come out ahead.

But there is that degree of uncertainty and you have to be able to expose yourself to

uncertainty in calculated doses.

Okay?

I mean, obviously don't just go out there and try to be in a relationship with somebody

that you know is severely incompatible with you or somebody that, you know, there's just

a complete mismatch between the two of you or something like that because that is as,

from what I understand that Thai people say like a dog barking at an airplane, the dog

is getting all worked up trying to, I don't know, do something with the airplane, but

the airplane of course is, you know, thousands and thousands of feet overhead and is completely

unaware that the dog is even there.

Right?

So you don't want to do that, but, you want to be completely okay with uncertainty or

at least okay with the amount of uncertainty that you're welcoming into your life.

If you're not okay with the amount of uncertainty that you're putting yourself in, then you

might want to dial it back to some amount of uncertainty that you are emotionally okay

with, or you might want to look at increasing your capacity for uncertainty in your life.

You have one of those two options, again, once more to reiterate.

Also, learn something from whatever happens to you in your love life.

Learn something from any setback that you experience and use that to your advantage

to have a stronger approach, a stronger strategy, a more compelling future for you.

Don't let the setbacks that happen just be, you know, terrible, awful, crappy things that

happened to you and then you know, you just brush yourself off and then go out there and

do the whole same thing all over again.

Learn something from it, refine your approach, get a little bit better with every experience

that you have.

So with that being said, let's go and talk about our questions and answers this week

from the people in our modern love association community.

Our first question is from Daniel.

Daniel writes in and says, how do you develop a more natural way of authenticity instead

of sounding scripted in interactions?

Okay, Daniel, so when it comes to sounding scripted in interactions, that's probably

because there is a part of you that actually is scripting your interactions, a part of

you that actually is in some respect turning your brain off and just going off of some

sort of memorized script or something that you thought of beforehand or something that

seemed to work in the past or something along those lines and whenever you're interacting

with somebody in that way from some sort of script or some sort of memorized speech or

some sort of thing that you thought beforehand or something like that, you're going to be

dead in the interactions because you're not actually present in the interactions yourself.

You're sort of hitting pause and saying, okay, let me go back through my history, my memory,

whatever, and pull out this thing that I thought up.

I don't know, a week ago or this thing that I said to the last five girls that I went

out with or something.

That worked out pretty well and let me just use that and that isn't really very authentic

because when you're actually being authentic in the moment, you're actually able to gauge

the other person's response, gauged their engagement with you and gauge how they are

following your story or how they are following what it is you're telling them or how they're

following the interaction and you're able to adjust what you're saying to match them.

So if they seem like they're getting bored, you could maybe say, hey, it seems like this

is a little bit boring for you, or you know, just check in with them or you could maybe

change up the pacing or if they're more of a detail person, you could maybe go into some

more details about some of the things that you're telling them or, whatever it might

be.

But you have to be able to feel into the interaction to be able to know whether you should be speeding

up, slowing down, revealing more of yourself, reviewing less of yourself and so on and so

forth.

And this all involves actually being present in the moment.

So if you're sounding scripted or if you're sounding inauthentic, then that probably is

because there is some part of you in those interactions that is not authentic, that is

not being really present in the moment, there is not being alive in that interaction and

I would look at how data is showing up for you and I'd look at ways that you could stop

doing that and instead start being more present and following, engaging where the other person

might actually be in the moment.

Okay.

So I hope that helped you out, Daniel, and if you have any more questions, please let

us know.

Our next question is from Jp.

Jp writes in and says in some of your old MQAs, you mentioned that if an ex is giving

complete radio silence, it may be beneficial to respond to that silence with empathy, clear

up ulterior motives or to respond to the unanswered message as if it were asked to you.

At what point do you suggest using these approaches over the light hemingway or Texas Tequila

type message?

Okay, JP.

So like I was just telling to Daniel, you want to be able to feel into the moment to

know when the right time to use this as.

It's not just like, okay, when the following three things are present, then you can turn

your brain off and clear up an ulterior motive or something like that.

What I want you to use, I want you to be able to ascertain what the right time to do these

sorts of things is.

But just as a rule of thumb, you have to feel into the moment.

You have to understand what the other person's emotional experience is.

So for example, if you're trying to contact somebody but they're not contacting you back

and you think that there might be some sort of emotional thing going on with them that's

causing them to not want to contact you back, you know, you might want to say, okay, well,

would it make more sense?

Would they feel more open and more comfortable talking to me if maybe I responded to their

silence with empathy?

Would they feel more open and comfortable talking to me if I cleared up some sort of

ulterior motive or if I apologized for something that I did that that they're still holding

onto hurt feelings for something like that, would it help them to feel more comfortable

interacting with me?

If I got the conversation going myself and responded to the message as if it were asked

to me, I don't want you to just be looking for signs or clues or hints or things like

that to tell you when the right time to use a certain strategy or another would be.

I want you to actually be able to put yourself in the other person's position to see the

world from their position so that you can understand, okay.

I think they are probably upset with me because they're still, I don't know, still hurt because

of that thing that I said that one time and they're not willing to let go of it and they're

still holding onto that grudge and if you're able to do that and you don't need me to tell

you, oh yeah, they're still holding onto a grudge.

But if you're actually able to feel into that situation yourself and say, oh, they are still

holding onto a grudge, you can say, Hey, I understand you might still be pissed off because

of that thing I said anyway.

I would just really want you to know that, that I didn't really mean that.

Or you know, whatever.

Just cleared up and then you can start to have a conversation because you know, if they

are still upset with you over something that you said or did from the past, just as an

example, they're not going to be able to let go of that and have a nice, friendly conversation

with you until that's cleared up.

I mean that should be pretty obvious, right?

So you want to be able to feel into these situations, you want to be able to know what

the right thing to do is by putting yourself in the other person's positions, not by just

memorizing a bunch of if then sort of scenarios, I want you to actually be able to feel into

the situation so that you can see the experience and feel the experience of what you are projecting

to the other person from that person's point of view and you can say, Ooh, that probably

doesn't feel good because I don't trust you enough yet or because I'm still upset about

the thing that happened in the past or because I don't know if you're invested in this conversation.

And then you can say, okay, well if they're feeling that way, then I should do this instead.

Okay, so JP, I hope this helps you out and please keep us updated on how things go moving

forward.

Our next question is from Sue.

Sue writes in and says, hi clay.

D and I broke up six months ago.

We were together for four years and he is in a rebound relationship with somebody who

is very controlling.

She tracks his location on his phone and made him block me everywhere, sent an email from

his email telling me not to reach out to him, etc.

He also says that she is not his girlfriend and no title and it's not gonna last says

that they are not compatible and constantly have differences, but 10 days ago, D had taken

her to a business meeting where our common friend was present.

Our friend told me that they looked like a happy couple and even kissed at breakfast.

That broke my heart.

However, the next day he texted me all day long highlights of which word quote I think

about you constantly still and can't seem to get a clear understanding of anything and

quote, quote, I wish I fully understood all that and took the dive and risk and got married

or what the next step would have been.

I mean, after all those years, it's pretty evident that we've been through thick and

thin and quote quote.

I often thought what would have happened when I say I love you in person and how it would

feel and quote, these were just some of the messages during our conversation that he kept

asking if I loved the guy that I'm dating and if I've slept with him.

However, as I suspected, not only did he disappear, he also blocked me on whatsapp.

The next day I've been going on dates just to keep myself distracted and one of them

even seem to be growing on me and seems more and more interesting, but my heart is with

D and D is all that I want without all the games that he's been playing.

I would like to know at which stage of getting back together he is on.

Would he even get back since he has a girlfriend though?

He says that he misses me.

He has blocked me everywhere.

Do I still have a chance?

Okay, so in terms of the stage that he might be in, it's.

It's really tough if we're just going off of some text messages here, but I would guess

that he is probably in late riding the dragon or possibly crisis point and the reason that

I'm saying that is because I have seen a lot of positive interactions from him towards

you and I haven't really seen any negative ones, so either he hasn't done a pullback

yet or he is over that part of riding a dragon where he would be doing that pull up and he's

mostly seeing you in a positive light.

Now as he gets further and further into the crisis point, he's going to have to deal with

that crisis that he is probably not addressing directly at this point, which is what to do

about this woman that he's dating, who's very controlling, who apparently sends emails from

his email account to you, who blocks you on his social media platforms, etc, etc.

He will have to deal with this at some point or another.

And you know, he has to either say, Hey, I'm going to stay in a relationship with this

controlling person, or no, I'm going to end this relationship and I'm going to see what

happens between Sue and I and this is his decision that he asked to make.

And the thing that you want to do as you enter into crisis point and as you travel through

crisis point is to keep positive pressure on him.

So you want to make sure the interactions between you and him that you do have continued

to feel good on an emotional level because I can guarantee you that the interactions

he's having with his current girlfriend do not feel good on an emotional level.

A does not feel good to know that the person that you're dating is tracking you on the

phone, that they're hacking into your email account and sending messages on your behalf

that they're blocking people from your social media.

And so on and so forth.

That's not something that I imagine anyone would really enjoy.

So she's applying the negative pressure and if you apply the positive pressure, you're

going to sandwich him between these two possibilities and the more pressure that gets applied, the

faster he will feel compelled to make a decision.

If there's not enough pressure, he will not feel compelled to make a decision.

And so we want to do is you want to apply this positive pressure to really stack the

deck in your favor so that when he does make a decision, it's more likely to go in your

favor as opposed towards the controlling woman, right?

If you're gonna, throw out ultimatums and you know, have interactions that feel bad,

then all bets are off.

But if you have interactions that feel good, if you're able to connect with him on a, on

a positive emotional level and all of that stuff, then you're really stacking the deck

in your favor and you also want to know where to even get back.

Since he has a girlfriend and he says he misses it.

Yeah, I think he, he's definitely is thinking about it.

He definitely is entertaining.

That idea is just, he's not really directly confronted with that crisis yet to the point

where he actually feels compelled to make a decision, right.

It might just be some sort of thought that's floating through his head or maybe he does

miss you, but he's not committed enough to the possibility of getting back together with

you to actually act on that.

So you want to do things like what we recommend inside ESP and continue to build that positive

emotional connection and continue to apply that pressure for things such as the crisis

point.

Okay. you also say that he is blocked you everywhere.

Do you still have a chance?

Well, it seems like he blocks you and then unblocks you or rather she blocks you and

then he unblocks you and messages you and then she blocks you again.

So, she is trying to control the flow of communication that he has with you and it seems that he

is able to sometimes unblock you and, and, and communicate with you in that way.

So, you know, yeah, you are blocked.

Yeah.

You are going to have a difficult time getting through to him, most likely due to her monitoring

of his activities and her managing of his activities, but it's clear to me that he does

still have strong feelings for you.

Do you believe that there is a possibility that the two of you could get back together?

it really depends on you and it depends on him and it depends on whether or not he is

really willing to step into that crisis and to make a decision.

but of course you can really help him by creating positive emotional interactions that do that

now, given that his current girlfriend is a very controlling person, you may not even

need to actually be there to create those positive interactions.

Sometimes it's just the memory of you being there, the memory of the positive interactions

that the two of you had contrasted with the controlling interactions that they have with

this other person that feel bad on an emotional level.

That could be enough to create the pressure to cause him to break up with you.

But nobody can really say one way or the other.

Exactly.

What's actually going to happen, but it's definitely something that I've seen before.

Do you still have a chance?

I mean, yeah, I mean there's, there's always a chance.

Unless of course you just give up.

There's always a possibility.

So, you know, yeah, there definitely is a chance.

They're just, like I told you the last time you asked me if there was a chance in your

situation.

So I hope this helps you out and please keep us updated on how things go moving forward.

Our next question is from Sarah.

Sarah writes in and says, hi clay.

My current relationship I'm trying to save, we have not broken up, at least as far as

I know.

At the same time, we are having a lot of arguments.

She said not being real with myself and what I want.

I said I'm the best boyfriend she had, but I don't trust her that I'm still hung up on

my situation of my ex cheating on me and getting over that, that I need to get over that issue

for us to have a great relationship.

Also said that we spend too much time together and she is not able to do stuff on her own.

We are spending time apart space as she suggests we need.

I need advice as to do the active no contact as people will say that may be too long for

space.

I'm also doing the compatibility code course, hoping she is not seeing anyone right now

at this time.

This is one week so far of ANC.

So far I've realized I have no hobbies, no friends to hang out with, felt too clingy

to her and wanted her validation.

Everything from her eyes.

I'm sure that I'm a mess at this time.

What advice would you give me in this situation so I can get on track for keeping my relationship

going?

Okay, so if you realize that you have no hobbies, no friends to hang out with and you are clinging

to her for validation on everything, that is where I would really start.

People often think that a relationship is going to make them happy, when in fact a relationship

is not going to make you happy.

It's just going to serve as a bit of distraction during the newness of it, but at the end of

the day, if you don't like your life right now, if you don't have anything going on in

your life right now, then a relationship is not going to suddenly fix it and make you

suddenly love your life.

You're just going to be somebody who still hates their life.

If you hated your life before, but you're going to also have a girlfriend or you know

if you're somebody else listening, a boyfriend in your life, and so the most important thing

that you can do is to actually love the life that you live with or without someone else

in it.

This is going to obviously cause you to enjoy yourself a whole lot more, especially as you

get into a relationship, but this is also going to make you a much more attractive person

in general as well too, because you have to understand that people are going to be drawn

to you and attracted to you based off of the life that you live.

If you hate your life, if you're not doing anything that you find enjoyable or worthwhile

with your life, then you are basically sending a broadcast message out to everybody in the

world that might date you, that says, Hey, if you want to be with somebody who hates

their life and is not doing anything worthwhile with their time than I'm the guy for you.

Right?

And that means that if, if there's somebody out there who has self esteem, somebody out

there who has goals and ambition in their life, somebody out there who wants to be a

part of a relationship where the other person actually has some sort of driving momentum

or some sort of goals or aspirations or friends or hobbies or whatever, then that person is

going to be fundamentally a turned off by you.

If you don't have those things and they're going to go and find somebody else to date,

which means that the only people that are actually going to want to date you are people

that are okay with you having no hobbies, no friends, no driving goals or aspirations

in life.

Right?

And these are probably going to be a certain type of people, right?

Kind of like if you know, like one thing that women often say is that, you know, oh well

guy needs to approach me.

I should never approach a guy because if you approach a guy shows that he's interested

in shows that he's serious about dating you and all that stuff.

And I don't believe that at all.

Right?

Really, if you take the passive route as a woman and you just wait for guys to approach

you, you're generally going to get approached by guys that generally approach women or don't

have a problem approaching women.

These include drunk guys, pick up artists and players for the most part.

And if you have been playing the passive role as a woman waiting for guys to approach you,

you may have been able to look back at the past and say, okay, I've been approached by

drunk guys.

Pick up artists and players.

Right?

And it makes you wonder where are all the good guys at where all the real men.

Well, the truth is is that most decent men out there don't approach women on a regular

basis.

You know, they might muster up the courage and you know, their friends might dare them

to do it once in a while or something, but most regular guys don't go up and talk to

a women they're attracted to on a, on a regular basis.

Especially if those women are strangers, you know, if they know them through a friend of

a friend or something, that's a different story.

But if it's just, you know, hey, I'm out on the street and there you are across the street.

Most guys aren't going to do that.

If you're at a bar and you're on the other side of our.

Most guys aren't just going to do that unless they are the kinds of people that are accustom

to approaching strangers or unless they just happen to muster up the courage on that particular

night to come over and talk to you.

If you were a woman and you wanted to meet a nice decent guy who's not a player, not

a pickup artist, not a drunk.

You might actually need to change your strategy and start talking to men, approaching men,

right?

I'm not saying you have to like take the masculine role and ask them out on a date and you know

your first word should be like, Hey, what's good?

Go out on a romantic date on it, but just have some smalltalk.

Interject yourself into his presence so that he feels comfortable talking to you and that

he has the ability to take the lead and to ask you out if that's what he wants, right?

But you don't have to take the passive role and mistake that for femininity because femininity

is not passive.

Femininity absolutely can be active.

Passive.

It is just passively.

It's not feminine.

Okay, so let's clear that up and going back to what you said, Sarah, when it comes to

you attracting high quality people, when it comes to high quality people being attracted

to you, the best thing that you can do is to live your life from a place of power.

Live your life from a place where you actually enjoy your life because that is actually going

to be incredibly much more attractive than whatever it is you're doing now that's causing

you to not have any hobbies or friends and to seek validation from a women.

Okay?

Because I can guarantee you, as you start to reclaim your life, as you start to move

your life into alignment with your own values, you're going to notice that you're going to

get a much different response from the people around you.

Okay, so I hope this helps you out and please keep us updated on how things go moving forward

from here.

Our next question is from Gigi.

Hi Clay.

I appreciate you helping me become more aware of my ex's frustration in not being able to

meet and wanting to connect deeper as I had never realized that because I have been so

focused on his pullback in texts, but I can see now how offering to meet in person does

in fact me and he's willing to go deeper, I suppose just not on phone anymore.

So to give an idea of what I meant by pull back last week, I have noticed that he is

not reaching out anymore.

This is a big step back to how often he used to as just a few weeks ago he was sharing

photos saying I should be there.

I know in videos you mentioned not worrying about who initiated it and once they fall

back in love they'll start to do more, but if it is the other direction where they were

in touch often and it stops, I assume it's due to a loss of interest.

I noticed though that he responds quickly and has some conversations with me if I reach

out that he doesn't let it get too deep or if we are joking around a little bit, he doesn't

let it go on like before and drops the conversation.

I feel nervous as it is different and it won't be possible to visit his city or see if he'd

visit me as you suggest for a few months.

Unfortunately, due to my health issues that he has known about, he has always disliked

phone calls, so I haven't asked for one yet though.

Maybe it's worth the risk of him saying no.

Seeing as how it's better to have voice.

I'd like to know how to reconcile the two things.

What would make him pull away in our communication lately, even though he has asked me to meet

several times the past few months and I couldn't do to being in the city.

What is creating this new gap between his low investment in communication and having

asked to meet not too long ago and how can I bridge the two until I'm able to get there

in a couple of months.

I feel like he is slipping away and I'm stuck.

Okay, so Gigi, when it comes to situations like this there you have to understand that

when somebody pulls back and is not communicative the way that they used to, it's not always

because of you.

It could be due to other things going on in his life.

I don't know.

Maybe he's just really busy with work or something came up and there's some kind of family drama

or whatever.

I know that for me personally, having a newborn daughter is requiring a lot of my time and

it's making it more difficult for me to actually keep in touch with people, in my own way.

Right.

It's not because of them, it's not because they don't like them any less.

It's just something my daughter is pulling away my attention and causing me to focus

on that.

Right.

And so something like that could be going on.

Another thing that could be happening as well too is that he is just growing frustrated

with the long distance thing and it's just not really working out for him anymore.

And so he's just kind of giving up because he just doesn't really see it going anywhere.

He's, he's tired of interacting only through screens and phones and stuff like that and

he's just not feeling the connection as much and he's starting to pull back a little bit

because he, he doesn't see a future between the two of you.

Okay.

So if you want to, you might, you might try reaching out to him and seeing if he would

be open to talking on the phone or something like that as opposed to texting.

I mean maybe that would work, I don't know, but you just have to use, have to really think

about where he's at on an emotional level and you want to create a connection that you

have to think about.

Okay, well what is it that I could do to meet him where he's at emotionally, right?

So maybe he's frustrated, maybe he's, he's tired of the whole texting game and all of

that stuff.

He's trying to guard himself a little bit because he can sense that you could easily

be pulled into interacting with you.

But he's just frustrated because it doesn't seem like it's ever going to go anywhere and

it's just going to be some sort of text relationship forever and ever.

Right.

So what do you think you could do to meet him where he's at emotionally that would actually

cause him to feel good interacting with you that actually caused him to see a future with

you?

They're actually caused him to want to co-create a future with you.

Maybe that would be actually talking to him on the phone.

Maybe that would be actually talking about getting together in person at some point in

the future.

Even if it's months away from now, maybe you could at least talk about it or planet or

or get the idea out there or something along those lines.

Right?

Because that can give him something to to latch onto that can give them something to

hang his hopes on.

Maybe you could also talk about the possibility of the two of you.

Maybe even someday living in the same location.

I don't know if that would make sense for you, but.

But if it does make sense, then maybe that's something that you could talk about a not.

I'm not saying that you should move to a place for him or anything like that, but if it's

something that is actually physically possible for you to do, then why not talk about it

so that he knows that this isn't just going to be some sort of endless long distance relationship

because nobody wants to be in an endless long distance relationship forever and ever and

ever.

They want it to eventually become a interpersonal relationship where you can actually wake up

in bed next to the person that you love, where you can go to brunch with the person that

you love, where you can introduce them to all of your friends and family members and

you can go to parties and do things together.

Right?

That's what people want.

And if they just think that they're just going to be in some sort of endless marathon, long

distance kind of thing, that can be a lot for them and it can make them want to give

up.

So, yeah, you might want to consider some of these things.

and I hope this helps you out, Gigi, and please keep us updated on how things go moving forward

from here.

Our next question is from Maddie.

Maddie writes in and says hello everyone.

Before I get into my questions, five stages wise, I think my ex is riding the dragon,

he's mostly positive towards me and I think that I'm still at the attachment stage.

Question one.

So I practiced the intimacy bubble for a little bit and ran into trouble both in using it

with other people as well as my ex people seem to be a bit put off whenever I asked

them.

What was that like for you?

They seem to find it weird.

My ex has told me that he finds it annoying because it seems fake to him.

You've never asked me that before.

Is there a more subtle way of using the intimacy bubble?

I mean, yeah, I mean, you don't have to use those exact questions.

You could just say things like, tell me more about that.

Or were you nervous when this thing happened or what was rushing through your head when

they said that?

Or, you know, things like that.

Things that actually make sense in the context, right?

You don't just have to robotically use the things that I tell you in in the, in the lesson.

That's just an example question too.

Even though I did ANC and the exercises suggested, I still find that talking to my ex impacts

me emotionally in a big and negative way.

Listening to him talk about his new relationship, which was one of the reasons he broke up with

me, leaves me feeling extremely sad.

Oftentimes I find myself overcome by new waves of anger both at him and his girlfriend.

After interacting with him, do you think this means that I need to do ANC again, should

I be vulnerable and tell him about my anger or should I somehow deal with this on my own?

Okay, so if interacting with him is causing you to feel bad on an emotional level, that

means that it is not conducive towards creating interactions that feel good on an emotional

level.

So what I would do is I would stop interacting with him until you are able to interact with

him.

And it feels good on an emotional level.

Okay?

Because the more you interact with him and it feels bad, the more you're going to pull

the two of you apart.

Okay?

Whether he feels bad or whether you feel bad, it is going to drive the two of you apart.

So it is a big thing that you are feeling bad for.

You do ANC, probably a should it be vulnerable and tell him about your anger.

Only if you think it's going to bring the two of you closer together.

If you think it's just going to cause the two of you to go further apart than I would

not tell him about your anger and how to deal with it.

On your own.

Question three, I'd like to ask my ex what made him lose motivation to save our relationship?

Is this a good question to ask or do you think it's going to make things worse?

If you think that he would be excited and thrilled to talk about why he lost the motivation

to save your relationship, then go ahead and ask it.

If you think it's going to bring the two of you closer together, then go ahead and ask

it.

If you think he's going to just be like, well, this is really obvious, why are you just cluing

in on this right now?

Then probably not.

Okay, so what I would do is I would just circle it all back and say, is this likely to create

an interaction that feels good on an emotional level for him, for me, and for the two of

us together.

If it is likely to do that, then go ahead and do it.

If it's unlikely to do that, then don't do it.

If you don't know if it's going to do that or not, then work more on your empathy skills.

Okay? with that being said, I hope this helps you out, Maddie, and keep us updated on how

things go moving forward.

From here.

Our next question is from AA.

AA writes in and says, hi clay.

Thanks for helping me out.

Last time, just to refresh, my ex and I and a long distance relationship had almost daily

contact.

I thought we were in phase four when he told me that he had kind of was in love with me

and sent me that gift.

He says he feels attached, attracted and that he can trust me to be there for him.

I'm also the closest person to him besides his family.

He has now pulled back a lot again and said because of his move to another country for

his career, we had to cut contact completely, but maybe we could be friends in the future.

He said he was tired of our contact and that we could never be happy again due to our past

arguments.

Although we've had many talks about our past and I have sincerely apologized.

He said that we had to think about this and that we most likely would talk soon.

I think had become a bit relationship focused after those events, but I also think him booking

a plane ticket caused him to stress out even more.

Plus dealing with his depression and family crisis.

So I guess I'm in riding the Dragon.

He texted me after telling me that he felt overwhelmed and carried so much anger for

the past with everyone and has to deal with it alone.

I empathized and told him that I respect his decision.

Although I said I did wish to keep our communication.

We ended the talk on a positive note.

After two days he reached out.

We had a brief that positive interaction.

I understand that there's so much going on that he doesn't feel ready for anything right

now and I do want to be there through this move and I think that we can get back to our

regular lovely interactions, but how can I move past his resentment?

Before I knew about esp, I did no contact, but it's like he doesn't remember because

he been depressed and time hasn't been a concept for a long time.

He would just forget a lot.

I'm working on detaching.

Doing ANC again.

How do I get past riding the Dragon?

I feel like I've been stuck there for so long.

Thank you.

Okay, so if you've done passive, no contact before, you've been essentially hoping that

time will make your ex want to emotionally connect with you, right?

That somehow the mere passage of time is going to change the quality of the interactions

that you have with each other, and that is not really necessarily true, right?

There are a lot of dubious reasons to do passive, no contact, most of which don't work, you

know, making her ex jealous, making them miss you, making them regret, breaking up with

you, making them a suddenly want to open up to you, all these sorts of things.

The ultimate thing here is that you're basically saying, okay, I, I'm not really a factor in

this.

The way I'm bringing myself to the interactions is irrelevant.

It's all about just me shutting off the spigot for a month or whatever, and then then I'll

just come back and everything's going to be great, and that's not how no contact actually

works.

What actually happens is if you do no contact passive, no contact, your ex is going to get

accustomed to life without you, and then when you come back into the picture, they're going

to suddenly remember you as the person that you were when you stopped contacting them,

and if you are the same person when you stopped contacting them, then they're going to see

no difference and they're going to say, wow, that's pretty good that I broke up with them

because they are exactly the same person that I broke up with.

Right?

And so if that was your no contact strategy, then I am not surprised that things are still

difficult and I would probably recommend some active, no contact emphasis on the active

part, emphasis on actively cultivating the ability to feel into situations and know what

the appropriate way to respond to them on an emotional level is because that will actually

help you to meet your ex where he is at an emotional level, connect with him at an emotional

level and create a bond with him so that the two of you can create a strong emotional connection.

Okay.

So yeah, I do think that doing active no contact would probably be a good move for you.

How do you get past riding the Dragon?

The way that you get past riding the dragon is that you create an emotional connection

that is strong so that you can really continue to build that emotional trust between you

and your ex.

Okay?

Your ex will continue to trust you.

The stronger the emotional connection is between you and them, and the stronger that connection

is, the more consistent that strong emotional connection is.

The more layers of trust will get built within your ex's emotional experience of you.

And the more layers of trust they build towards you, the more they're going to actually start

to, not have these pullbacks anymore because they're going to really see you as the person

that you are.

They're going to really understand that they can consistently go to you and they're going

to consistently get a similar emotional response and that they can actually start to put some

faith into interacting with you on an emotional level.

And as that happens, you'll be able to move past riding the dragon into the crisis point

where ex will have to really directly confront the actual reasons that are keeping the two

of you apart.

Okay.

So I hope this helped you out AA and please keep us updated on how things go moving forward.

Our next question is from Ellie.

Ellie writes in and says, hi clay.

It has been eight months of wall of reactions from my ex and I am finally ready both time

wise and emotionally to talk to him about his decision to prevent a friendship from

happening between us.

We have organized a talk over online chat because he was not willing to meet up in person.

I want to open up a discussion about the wall between us and move past it so that we may

start redeveloping a friendship.

I plan to focus on the emotional connection above all else.

That's a great idea, even if you won't budge on his decision.

However, I also want to let him know how I feel about being called out for so long.

Unfortunately, I have a history of letting him know how he has hurt me in the past, a

lot of which were just misinterpretations of events by me, which is why he decided to

wall in the out in the first place.

I think he's afraid of feeling guilty and I don't want to make him feel guilty that

way, but I also think that I should express my sadness over being walled out.

Do you think this is a good idea for me to express my feelings on being walled out and

risk upsetting him as a result?

If so, how can I best express my feelings on the matter without upsetting him or ruining

the connection because I made him feel bad.

If you feel that it is not a good idea, then do you have any advice on how I might forgive

him for walling me out?

I believe the main reason I want to express myself to him is because I want him to acknowledge

my experiences and apologize to me.

I understand that he is not obligated to, but it is what I would like.

Okay, so I would express your feelings about being walled out if you think that it is going

to strengthen the emotional connection between the two of you.

Okay.

You have to look at your look at this and say, what is the purpose of me expressing

my hurt to him?

You say you want him to acknowledge your experience and to apologize for it, but what is the benefit

of him saying, you know, yeah, I wold you out.

What's the benefit of him doing that?

Like, is this going to help you feel better in some way?

If it's not going to help you feel better in some way and it's not going to bring the

two of you closer together, then I don't really see much of a reason to do it.

If you do decide you're going to do it, I would recommend you go through the communication

section of ESP.

We talked about a lot of things there regarding communication, owning your experiences, etc,

etc, so that there's a little possibility for him to misinterpret what you say and to

take it the wrong way and all that stuff.

So definitely review that if I think it's not a good idea, how do I suggest you forgive

him for walking you out?

I would just suggest that you put yourself in his position and say, okay, well in the

past Ellie has lashed out at me and said some things just based out of misinterpretations

of events.

So you know, would it be so surprising that that, you know, he might while you out, could

you understand where he's coming from?

Could you understand what his emotional driver might be?

Could you understand why he might choose to wall you out?

If you can put yourself in his situation and say, okay, yeah, well if somebody did that

to me, I would probably do the same thing or a, you know, I might've done things differently,

but I can totally understand maybe what motivated him to do that.

That makes sense.

When I think about it from that perspective, then then just simply putting yourself in

his position and understanding where he's coming from, that can be enough to help you.

Let go of this, this need to express this to him.

If it's not really going to be helpful in any way whatsoever.

Okay, Ellie, so I hope this helps you out and keep us updated on how your online chat

with him goes.

Our next question is from faithful in love, faithful in love.

Writes in and says, hello clay.

Thank you for answering my question.

Last week, a few months ago, me and my ex had met after a period of not talking to each

other.

He made me promise that I won't tell his parents about the Meet up.

Guess that was because he didn't want his jealous rebound partner to find out.

He asked me to lie to them if they were asking, which I did to avoid a fight.

He promised me to tell them.

As soon as, we were on speaking terms.

Now four months later, although the rebound is history, he still hasn't told them that

we are friends.

Still says that he will do that.

When I asked him what makes him keep this a secret, he said it's because he doesn't

want them to think anything bad.

I said it's his family, so of course he can do it.

In his time, I don't want to ask any further because he was busy and I see that the topic

doesn't feel good for him.

I'm on good terms with his parents and I don't understand why he struggles telling them,

can you help me understand what might be going on here?

What makes it so difficult for him?

After I begged and put pressure on him for months in damage control mode, I now want

to avoid pressuring my ex in any subtle way.

That's why sometimes taking longer to reply so that he doesn't feel like I'm expecting

him to always be available.

It's not about keeping score.

I know my overinvestment is something that I should work on.

I know this will take some time getting away from being attached to outcome.

Can you give me advice on how to evolve here?

I'm scared to let go and afraid it could hurt my chances of getting him back.

Hosting couchsurfing, as you suggested last week, is nothing that I can do as I have a

one room apartment, but sometimes I sleep in hostels, sharing rooms with strangers.

Those are opportunities to meet all different kinds of people and connect with them.

What is your opinion on that?

yeah.

I think that's an opportunity to connect with people as well too.

Regarding your other questions.

Let's see.

You said what would make it so difficult for him to tell his family?

Probably because they see his family has a lot of strong opinions about you and he doesn't

want to let them know that you're back in the picture until he is pretty sure about

how you fit into his life and so that he can really tell his family, hey, we're, I don't

know, getting back into a relationship or just friends or whatever.

Right.

And so he probably doesn't want to tell them until he really knows what he's telling them

because they might think, oh, well, you know, faithful in love is no good or faithful in

love is the best person.

I can't wait for you to get back together or whatever.

And so he's probably still in the process of feeling that out and trying to understand

what the two of you are when it comes to your relationship.

To one another when it comes to helping you to get over an attachment to outcome, I'm

really the best thing that you can do is to look for ways in your day to day life where

you are attached to outcome in in smaller ways.

Like maybe it's just like, oh, when I go to the coffee shop and order my coffee in the

morning and I order, I don't know, a latte or something, and then they make me a, I don't

know, something different, a Mocha or something like, do I get upset?

Do I like where do I go emotionally?

What happens emotionally and how can I work through those emotions in a productive way?

Right?

Where can I be less attached outcome?

Not In that I'm going to be a doormat, but that I can be open to things happening the

way they happen and I don't have to have an emotional response where maybe I just yell

at the person for making me the wrong drink, but instead I can maybe understand that maybe

they were stressed.

Maybe they misheard things and I can say, Hey, I'm sorry but I ordered a Latte, but

you gave me a Mocha.

Can we fix this?

Or you know, you can come up with something to to to respond to them in a rational sort

of collected way that's not going to be sort of a you an emotional outburst of sorts.

Okay, so look for small ways in your day to day life where you can really be less attached

to outcome and where you can be more open to where things go.

Maybe this involves having more free flowing conversations with people where you don't

have a hidden agenda.

We're not trying to get something out of them when you're just simply being present with

them.

We're just letting the conversation go wherever it goes and you just open to talk about whatever

you're open to.

Talk about where maybe you can actually be more vulnerable with the people that you're

having conversations with without trying to look good or, or, or, or, or make.

Make sure that you don't look bad or whatever it might be.

And you can just simply tell them like, hey, yeah, like this is how I feel about things.

This is what happened in my life.

You know, if I'm being honest with it, with you, I voted for Donald Trump.

You know, whatever it is, right?

And you don't have to worry about the consequences because you're not attached outcome.

You're not attached to looking good, you're not attached to not looking bad or whatever

it might be just to look for these ways in your life where you can detach from outcome

and where you can just simply let life take you where it's going to take you and you don't

have to be so wound up about making sure that you look good, making sure that you don't

look bad, making sure that things go a certain way, make sure they don't go a certain way

or whatever it might be.

Okay, so I hope this helps you out.

Faithful in love, and please keep us updated on how things go moving forward from here.

Okay?

Those have been our questions this week.

Once again, this has been Clay with www.ModernLove.Life.

If you have liked this relationship and a game experience, please give us a thumbs up.

Go ahead and subscribe to us on Youtube or on Itunes, and please leave a comment down

below letting us know what you think about our videos.

Anyway, I will talk to you next week.

I hope this has helped you improve your relationship inner game.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét