Thứ Bảy, 2 tháng 6, 2018

News on Youtube Jun 2 2018

For more infomation >> Kate Middleton will make public appearance this week and THIS is what she will wear - Duration: 3:28.

-------------------------------------------

Episode 1148 | The Line: Judge Rules UNM Foundation Subject To Public Records Laws - Duration: 7:54.

>> WELCOME BACK TO THE LINE TABLE.

LAST WEEK, STATE DISTRICT JUDGE NANCY FRANCHINI RULED

THAT RECORDS HELD BY THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO

FOUNDATION ARE SUBJECT TO THE INSPECTION OF PUBLIC

RECORDS ACT, ALSO KNOWN AS IPRA, AND MUST BE RELEASED

TO THE PUBLIC.

UNM HAD ARGUED THAT AS A FUND RAISING ARM OF THE

UNIVERSITY, IT WAS A PRIVATE NONPROFIT ENTITY AND DID NOT

HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THAT IPRA REQUEST.

CAROLYN, THIS REALLY WAS BROUGHT ABOUT IN THE WAKE OF

A PARTICULAR LAWSUIT THAT WE'LL GET TO IN A SECOND,

BUT SETTING ASIDE THE SPECIFICS OF THE CASE FOR A

SECOND, TRANSPARENCY ADVOCATES ARE REALLY LOVING

THIS, AND IT COULD HAVE IMPLICATIONS, ACTUALLY, FOR

OTHER UNIVERSITIES AND OTHER ENTITIES AROUND THE STATE.

WHAT'S YOUR TAKE ON THIS?

>> WELL, I HOPE IT DOES.

I HOPE IT'S A DOMINO EFFECT, BECAUSE TO ME, IT WAS KIND

OF A NO-BRAINER.

>> IT SEEMED SO FROM DAY ONE, DIDN'T IT.

>> SO I WAS REALLY THRILLED JUST TO SEE THE COURTS BACK

THAT UP, AND HOPEFULLY THERE WILL BE A DOMINO EFFECT ALL

THE WAY DOWN.

>> IS THIS ONE OF THOSE BEHAVIOR CHANGING THINGS IN

YOUR VIEW?

TRANSPARENCY IS ALL WELL AND GOOD, BUT UNLESS IT CHANGES

BEHAVIOR, IT DOESN'T REALLY MEAN ANYTHING.

DO YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN?

SO IS THIS SOMETHING?

IS THIS A BIG ENOUGH DEAL THAT OTHER UNIVERSITIES ARE

GOING TO HAVE TO HUDDLE LITERALLY ON MONDAY MORNING

AND GO, YOU KNOW WHAT, WE NEED TO REALLY RETHINK OUR

DEAL HERE?

>> I MEAN, I DO THINK IT IS A GAME-CHANGER, YES, AND I

THINK THEY WILL HAVE TO RETHINK HOW THEY DO, AND THE

PEOPLE THAT SUPPORT THE NONPROFITS WILL HAVE TO TAKE

PAUSE.

>> ABSOLUTELY.

TOM, THE FOUNDATION HAD THIS COVER FOR A LONG TIME.

A LONG, LONG TIME.

AND A LOT OF FOLKS WERE NOT HAPPY ABOUT THIS.

WHAT'S YOUR SENSE OF IT NOW THAT THIS RULING HAS COME

DOWN?

PRETTY UNAMBIGUOUS.

IT'S NOT VERY GRAY HERE.

>> YES, I LOVE THE TERMINOLOGY OF IT.

IT'S A CREATURE OF THE UNIVERSITY.

AND TO YOUR QUESTION, YOU KNOW, IS THERE GOING TO BE A

CHANGE IN BEHAVIOR, WELL, I THINK PEOPLE ARE CREATURES

OF HABIT.

I THINK IT'S THE RIGHT RULING.

I THINK THAT THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO, AS ANY

UNIVERSITY DOES, LEVERAGES IT'S FOUNDATION TO MAKE THE

DEALS AND TO MAKE IT AND PROVIDE A NICE LITTLE TAX

HAVEN, AND AS A RESULT, THERE'S SOME TRANSPARENCY

THAT NEEDS TO GO ALONG WITH THAT, AS WELL.

THEY ARE NOT AN ISLAND TO THEMSELVES AS THEY PROVIDED

IN THE COURT DOCUMENTS.

THEY ARE ACTUALLY PART OF THE UNIVERSITY, AND I'M GLAD

THAT THIS RULING CAME OUT THE WAY THAT IT DID.

>> DEDE, MY SENSE OF IT IS, THIS IS GOING TO BE BETTER

FOR THE UNIVERSITY IN THE LONG RUN.

CLEARLY AT SOME POINT WE HAVE TO KNOW HOW THIS MONEY

IS MOVING AROUND.

>> WELL, PARTICULARLY WITH THE SCANDALS IN THE ATHLETIC

DEPARTMENT, WE NEED TO KNOW EXACTLY, AND THAT'S WHERE

THE CHALLENGE ORIGINATED.

WE HAVE TO KNOW ABOUT THAT.

BUT I'M THINKING IT WILL HAVE BIGGER IMPLICATIONS

THAN JUST THE FOUNDATION.

AND REMEMBER, EVERY STATE MUSEUM, EVERY UNIVERSITY HAS

A FOUNDATION, BUT THESE ARE STATE INSTITUTIONS.

THESE ARE, YOU KNOW, CREATURES OF THE STATE THAT

THEN CREATED OTHER CREATURES CALLED FOUNDATIONS.

BUT THE MORE THAT STATE GOVERNMENT, IN GENERAL,

OUTSOURCES THINGS -- THIS HAS BIGGER IMPLICATIONS, FOR

EXAMPLE, AND I WANT TO DISCLOSE THAT I'M ON THE FOG

BOARD WHICH FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF IN THIS CASE, AND

FILES AMICUS BRIEFS ON OTHER CASES.

FOR EXAMPLE, THE PRISONS OUTSOURCE THEIR HEALTH CARE

AND USE THE IDEA THAT THIS IS A PRIVATE COMPANY

PROVIDING HEALTH CARE TO THE PRISONERS AS A REASON THEY

SHOULD NOT BE TRANSPARENT.

SO THIS IS A LARGE AREA HERE THAT AS THERE'S MORE

PRIVATIZATION AND MORE OUTSOURCING, THERE ARE MORE

EXCUSES NOT TO BE TRANSPARENT, EVEN THOUGH

IT'S A PUBLIC SERVICE.

SO I THINK THIS RULING WILL HAVE BIG IMPLICATIONS, AND

IT WAS A SUMMARY JUDGMENT, TOO.

YOU KNOW, IT WASN'T EVEN GOING INTO THE DETAILS OF

THE CASE.

>> THAT'S RIGHT.

>> SO I'M VERY PLEASED WITH JUDGE FRANCHINI, AND I HOPE

THAT THE UNIVERSITY WILL NOT APPEAL IT.

>> YOU KNOW, I TEASED AT THE BEGINNING OF THE SUIT

ITSELF, DANIEL LIBIT, SOMEONE WE ALL KNOW FROM

NMFISHBOWL.com, HE'S DONE SOME WONDERFUL WORK, HE

FILED THE SUIT, HE HAS AN ATTORNEY THAT WENT WITH

THIS, AS WELL, AND TOM MADE THE GREAT QUOTE, IT'S A

CREATURE OF THE UNIVERSITY.

IT ALL SEEMS VERY CLEAR NOW THAT WE'RE READING ABOUT IT

AFTER THE FACT, ISN'T IT, THAT THIS FOUNDATION -- IF

YOU'RE MOVING MONEY AROUND IN THE BENEFIT OF THE

UNIVERSITY, AT SOME POINT WE HAVE TO KNOW HOW THAT MONEY

IS MOVING AROUND.

SO TALK ABOUT YOUR REPORTING AND MR.

LIBIT, AND HOW HE PULLED THIS ONE OFF.

>> I TALKED TO DANIEL NUMEROUS TIMES ABOUT THIS

AND MANY OTHER THINGS, ESPECIALLY HIS REPORTING,

BUT I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO FOCUS ON WHAT HE WAS

TRYING TO GET AT WITH THIS RECORDS REQUEST.

IT WASN'T -- OF COURSE, IT WAS THE BIGGER PICTURE THAT

THEY'RE RAISING MONEY FOR THE UNIVERSITY, BUT IT WAS

LITERALLY THAT HE WANTED TO KNOW HOW THE PAYMENTS, OR IF

THE PAYMENTS WERE BEING MADE FROM THIS PRIVATE COMPANY TO

UNM, AND UNM SAID, WE DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH

THIS GROUP, AND THAT GROUP SAID, WELL...

SO LITERALLY AS A PUBLIC, WE HAVE NO IDEA HOW MUCH MONEY

WAS PAID FROM WISE PIES TO THE ARENA AND WHETHER THEY

WERE LETTING THINGS GO.

>> HE ACTUALLY LOOKED INTO THAT $600,000 CHECK, BECAUSE

WE DON'T KNOW.

>> HE LOOKED INTO IT AND SAID EVERYTHING'S FINE, BUT

THEN HE STARTED FINDING THAT THERE'S PROBABLY A LOT OF

SUITES, OR PEOPLE THAT OWN SUITES -- OR NOT OWN, BUT

RENT SUITES FROM THE PIT, WHETHER THEY'RE PAYING THEIR

BILLS ON TIME.

THAT'S REALLY IMPORTANT WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE

UNIVERSITY BUDGETARY ISSUES.

ARE WE COLLECTING MONEY THAT WE SHOULD BE EASILY

COLLECTING?

>> THAT'S A GOOD POINT THERE.

CAROLYN, THIS IDEA THAT REPORTERS CAN STILL GET OUT

THERE AND MUCK IT UP WITH GIANT INSTITUTIONS LIKE

THIS, YOUR SENSE OF MR.

LIBIT AND HIS WORK HERE AND HOW HE SORT OF BROUGHT

THIS TO THE SURFACE.

BECAUSE WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT, HE'S REALLY STAYED WITH

THIS.

THIS HAS NOT BEEN A THREE-MONTH PROJECT, THIS

HAS BEEN AN ONGOING THING THAT HE'S JUST NOT GOING TO

LET GO OF.

>> YEAH, AND I THINK WE NEED THOSE RENEGADE JOURNALISTS

OUT THERE TO SORT OF SPEARHEAD THIS.

THAT'S WHAT HE IS, AND KUDOS TO HIM FOR DOING THIS.

IT'S A GREAT RULING.

>> WHAT DO YOU THINK GARNETT STOKES IS THINKING RIGHT

NOW?

SHE'S WALKED INTO A MESS OUT HERE.

IT'S AMAZING, ISN'T IT?

MAYBE IT'S A GOOD THING FOR HER.

I MEAN, I WAS JUST KIDDING, BUT MAYBE IT'S A GOOD THING.

>> SHE COULD START OUT BEING VERY TRANSPARENT AND SHE

COULD START OUT SETTING THE TONE.

SHE COULD START OUT THAT WAY.

>> THAT'S RIGHT.

THIS IDEA, AGAIN, GOING BACK TO THE POINT ANDY MADE, IT

WAS ABOUT THIS ONE SPECIFIC THING, BUT THEN IT KIND OF

BROADENED INTO THIS WHOLE IDEA OF TRANSPARENCY.

WE'VE GOT THE LOBO CLUB OUT THERE, WE'VE GOT LOTS OF

DIFFERENT WAYS WE CAN LOOK AT DIFFERENT THINGS AND HOW

MONEY WORKS.

BUT THERE CAN BE NO ARGUMENT, IF YOU'VE GOT

$600,000 OUT THERE ALLEGEDLY BEING PAID TO AN

INSTITUTION, AND NO ONE CAN REALLY SHOW WHETHER IT

ACTUALLY HAPPENED OR NOT, YOU'VE GOT TO HAVE A CHANGE

AT SOME POINT IN YOUR CULTURE.

>> YEAH, AND BY FULL DISCLOSURE, MY COMPANY HAS

DONE WORK WITH WISE PIES AND ITS PARENT COMPANY,

SC3 INTERNATIONAL, AND I THINK THAT WHAT WE'VE SEEN

DEVELOP HERE IS JUST HOW A UNIVERSITY AND A FOUNDATION

REALLY HANG THEIR MAJOR DONORS OUT TO DRY.

SO I THINK THERE'S JUST A LOT OF CONFUSION BROUGHT

UPON ITSELF BY THE FOUNDATION AND CLAIMING THIS

DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY THAT I THINK WILL NOW GET CLEARED

UP, AND I BELIEVE THAT THE CANCELED CHECKS WILL APPEAR,

AND THAT THIS EVENT WILL KIND OF GO INTO THE ANNALS

OF HISTORY.

>> THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR TIME ON A FRIDAY NIGHT.

CAROLYN, YOU WERE GREAT.

HOPE TO SEE YOU BACK HERE.

THANK YOU ALL FOR JOINING US.

IF YOU WANT TO SHARE YOUR REACTIONS TO THIS WEEK'S

TOPICS, GET IN TOUCH WITH US HERE AT

NewMexicoInFocus.org.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

For more infomation >> Episode 1148 | The Line: Judge Rules UNM Foundation Subject To Public Records Laws - Duration: 7:54.

-------------------------------------------

Denmark bans face veil in public spaces - Duration: 4:16.

Denmark has become the latest European country to ban the Islamic burqa and

niqab by outlawing the wearing of face veils in public a majority of lawmakers

voted in favor of the ban as Muslim women wearing conservative religious

clothing looked on the law was proposed by the center-right government which

argued face veils were contrary to Danish values but it insists the ban

doesn't target religious groups first-time offenders of the so-called

burqa ban which goes into effect on August 1st will be fined 1000 days

crowns about 115 pounds the fine increases to 10,000 crowns 11,500 pounds

after a fourth violation Denmark is the fifth European country to pass a

complete burka ban in public joining Austria Belgium Bulgaria and

France which in 2001 became the first to do so Denmark's law also applies to face

coverings such as false beers and masks it is estimated that only about 200

women in Denmark where the Nike or burka the nightcap is a veil that covers a

woman's entire face except the eyes while the one-piece burqa which covers a

woman's body and entire face as a transparent veil human rights group

Amnesty International called the ban a discriminatory violation of women's

rights an earlier proposal that allowed prison sentences as punishment had been

previously removed the Danish People's Party failed in its attempt this week to

amend the legislation to include prison sentences for offenders other European

countries or individual regions have full or partial bans in the Netherlands

face veils are banned in some public places including schools hospitals and

public transport a similar law is in effect in the German state of Bavaria

the Swiss canton of testin has outlawed a religious clothing entirely in public

danish lawmakers voted 75 30 on Thursday to pass the legislation proposed by

the country's three parties centre-right coalition - the liberal conservative and

Danish people's parties all voted in favor of the law along with the

opposition Social Democrats except for one lone MP that jerk-off the local

reported an additional 74 members of parliament abstained from the vote just

as Minister Soren Pape Allison head of the Conservative Party in a

government backed by the nationalist Danish People's Party said police would

not order offenders to remove their veils but would find them and tell them

to go home he said when the bill was proposed in

February it is incompatible with the values of the Danish society or the

respect for the community to keep the face hidden when meeting each other in

the public space Zainab insane who lives in Copenhagen

and has been wearing the niqab for the last year told Reuters it's not nice it

will mean that I won't be able to go to school go to work or go out with my

family the 20 year old added but I won't take my nightcap off so I have to find

another solution Amnesty International's Europe director Gauri van Gulick said

all women should be free to dress as they please in to wear clothing that

expresses their identity or beliefs this band will have a particularly negative

impact on Muslim women who choose to wear the niqab or burka whilst some

specific restrictions on the wearing of full-faced veils for the purposes of

public safety may be illegitimate this blanket ban is neither necessary nor

proportionate and violates the rights to freedom of expression and religion if

the intention of this law was to protect women's rights it fails object instead

the law criminalizes women for their choice of clothing and in so doing flies

in the face of those freedoms Denmark purports to uphold

For more infomation >> Denmark bans face veil in public spaces - Duration: 4:16.

-------------------------------------------

Public heath vs private business with smoking ban - Duration: 0:43.

For more infomation >> Public heath vs private business with smoking ban - Duration: 0:43.

-------------------------------------------

Public Networks Like Airports and Hotels Risks and Solutions Part 2 - Duration: 6:11.

Hello and Welcome to my Tutorial.

Everyone wants to use public Wi-Fi: it's free, but in part one we have seen how we can easily

be tricked by a Man-In-The-Middle attack or by a Fake Wi-Fi Connection.

However, there are still two more incredible ways for hackers to get sensitive info from

You while you are connected in a Public Network but, don't worry ...I am here to explain them

all to You.

My name is Nicola Scanni.

With a degree in Multimedia and a passion for technology, I have a tendency to pass

along my knowledge in a very simple way.

In this video I will consider two more ways cybercriminals can get access to your private

data and potentially steal your identity and what you can do to protect yourself.

If You are using a VPN or Virtual Private Network like the one that you can reach by

following the link in my description below then, You are secure from all these types

of attacks.

This is why, in the video next month, I will show You how to install and use a VPN.

...but now, let's talk about the...

RISK #3.

Packet Sniffing

Yes, the name may sound funny, but the actual practice of 'packet sniffing' is far from

a laughing matter.

This method helps a hacker to acquire airborne information, select them and then analyze

it at their own speed.

To do this, it's so simple that you don't even need to be an hacker to do it and in

some cases it's not even illegal.

I'm serious.

David Maimon, Assistant Professor in the department of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the

University of Maryland, has investigated the dangers of using public

Wi-Fi with his legal team.

His team checked whether it's okay to sniff and amazing enough they couldn't find any

law preventing anyone from sniffing.

It is only illegal if when you log in to public WiFi, there is an opt-in where you agree on

their terms of use, and these terms specifically mention that you're not allowed to sniff.

Therefore, if you login to a Public Network and there is not a banner or not an opt-in

...then it's not illegal at all.

A device, like your Mobile for example, transmits a data packet across an unencrypted network,

which can then be read by a free software like Wireshark.

Yes ... I said it, the software it's free, but it has to be because it's a handy tool

for analyzing web traffic, including, ironically enough, finding cybercriminals and vulnerabilities

that need patching.

In fact, if you look it up online, you'll even find an 'how to' guide that teaches you

how to use Wireshark.

Basically, hackers or anyone, can obtain an abundance of data then, scan through it and

get important information like passwords and much more.

SOLUTION: #3 What can you do?

Once Again, you need to rely on strong encryption, so we recommend a VPN.

If you're not sure about that, make sure sites requiring private information use SSL/TLS

certificates (so look for for a website with an HTTPS).

RISK #4.

Sidejacking (Session Hijacking)

Sidejacking relies on obtaining information via packet sniffing.

Instead of using that data retroactively, a hacker uses it on-location.

Even worse, it bypasses some degrees of encryption!

Log-in details are typically sent through an encrypted network (hopefully) and verified

using the account information held by the website.

This then responds using cookies sent to your device.

But the latter isn't always encrypted — a hacker can hijack your session and can gain

access to any private accounts you're logged into.

While cybercriminals can't read your password through sidejacking, they could download malware

that would obtain such data, even including Skype.

Furthermore, they can get plenty of information to steal your identity.

Just look at the wealth of data can be inferred from Facebook alone!

Public hotspots are especially appealing for this hack because there's typically a high

percentage of users with open sessions.

The Firefox extension, Firesheep demonstrated how easily sidejacking can be accomplished,

forcing Facebook and Twitter to require HTTPS when signing in.

SOLUTION #4.

What can you do?

Again, HTTPS offers a good level of encryption, so if you really must go on sites requiring

personal information, do it through this secure connection.

Similarly, a VPN should combat sidejacking.

As an added security measure, make sure you always log out when you're leaving a hotspot,

or risk letting a hacker continue to use your session.

With Facebook, you can at least check the locations where you're logged in and sign

out remotely.

Open Settings - Security - Where You're Logged In.

Once you don't recognise?

Simply click End Activity and it will log you off that device.

This is it for today's tutorial.

Next we'll talk about how to install a VPN to your device.

If you liked my tutorial do not forget to subscribe to my Channel.

This way every first Weekend of the month, you will find a new video here on my YouTube

channel.

If you have a question please leave a message, I will answer as soon as possible.

Thank you for listening and, enjoy your privacy while using a Public network.

Ciao.

SECURE Yourself with PureVPN = https://tinyurl.com/y9z7wz4v

http://www.davidmaimon.net/

Image Credit: Wireshark Team via Wikimedia Commons = https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/01/Wireshark-1-6-2.png/1024px-Wireshark-1-6-2.png

For more infomation >> Public Networks Like Airports and Hotels Risks and Solutions Part 2 - Duration: 6:11.

-------------------------------------------

Helena, Lewis & Clark County conducting public survey on local parks - Duration: 1:29.

For more infomation >> Helena, Lewis & Clark County conducting public survey on local parks - Duration: 1:29.

-------------------------------------------

DPHHS reminds the public to be rabies aware - Duration: 1:09.

For more infomation >> DPHHS reminds the public to be rabies aware - Duration: 1:09.

-------------------------------------------

✅ Dieselfahrverbot, Public Viewing: Achtung, das ändert sich für Verbraucher ab Juni - Duration: 4:04.

Ab Juni gelten einige neue Gesetze in Deutschland. Die relevantesten Neuregelungen für Verbraucher haben wir hier zusammengefasst:Gelockerter Lärmschutz beim Public Viewing Wenn viele Menschen gemeinsam Fußball gucken, kann es schon mal etwas lauter werden

Damit das Public Viewing nicht mit den strengen deutschen Lärmschutz-Vorschriften kollidiert, gibt es zur WM in Russland eine Ausnahmeregelung

Das Bundeskabinett beschloss eine Verordnung, die die Open-Air-Übertragung der WM-Spiele auf Großleinwänden auch nach 22

00 Uhr grundsätzlich erlaubt. Gut jedes zweite EM-Spiel wird erst um 21.00 Uhr angepfiffen

Ab 22.00 Uhr - wenn gerade erst die zweite Halbzeit beginnt - ist jedoch allenfalls Lärm bis zu 55 Dezibel erlaubt

Weil diese Marke beim Public Viewing meist überschritten wird, gibt es seit der Fußball-Weltmeisterschaft 2006 bei großen Turnieren regelmäßig eine Ausnahmeregelung, die nach dem Endspiel wieder außer Kraft tritt

Im Einzelfall liegt die Entscheidung jedoch bei der jeweiligen Kommune, die zwischen dem öffentlichen Interesse am Fußballgucken und dem Schutz der Nachtruhe abwägen muss

Die WM in Russland beginnt am 14. Juni, das Finale wird am 15. Juli ausgetragen.Bundesweit erste Diesel-Fahrverbote in HamburgDie bundesweit ersten Diesel-Fahrverbote wegen zu schlechter Luft treten in Hamburg in Kraft

Wie die Umweltbehörde der Hansestadt ankündigte, ist bereits vom 31. Mai an eine Sperrung zweier Straßenabschnitte für ältere Dieselautos und Lastwagen geplant

Die Durchfahrtsbeschränkungen gelten für zwei Straßenabschnitte im Stadtteil Altona-Nord

Laut dem Hamburger Luftreinhalteplan soll nun ein 580 Meter langer Teil der Max-Brauer-Allee für Dieselfahrzeuge gesperrt werden, die nicht die moderne Abgasnorm Euro-6 erfüllen

Ebenfalls unter ein Fahrverbot fällt ein rund 1,6 Kilometer langer Abschnitt der Stresemannstraße

Dieser soll aber nur für ältere Diesel-Lkw gesperrt werden, nicht für Pkw. Ausgenommen sind zudem Rettungsfahrzeuge, Anwohner und deren Besucher, Müllwagen, Lieferfahrzeuge und Taxis, sofern sie Passagiere aufnehmen oder absetzen

Höherer Mindestlohn?Im Juni könnte eine allgemeine Erhöhung des gesetzlichen Mindestlohns beschlossen werden

Die Mitglieder der Mindestlohnkommission tagen nämlich im Juni und werden über eine Anpasssung diskutieren

Derzeit liegt der gesetzliche Mindestlohn bei 8,84 Euro. Bisherige Berechnungen des Statistischen Bundesamtes gehen von einer Erhöhung auf 9,19 Euro im kommenden Jahr aus

Die nächste Anpassung soll laut der Kommission zum 1. Januar 2019 erfolgen.Neuausrichtung des BundeskriminalamtsDas Bundeskriminalamt (BKA) soll neu aufgestellt werden

Die entsprechenden Regelungen des Gesetzes zur Neustrukturierung des Bundeskriminalamtgesetzes sind bereits am 25

Mai 2018 in Kraft getreten. So soll das BKA ein neues IT-System erhalten und künftig als „Zentralstelle des nationalen polizeilichen Informationswesens und als Kontaktstelle für die internationale Zusammenarbeit" fungieren, wie es auf der Internetseite der Bundesregierung heißt

Durch die neuen Regelungen könnten künftig etwa auch Daten erhoben werden, die durch verdeckte Maßnahmen zur Abwehr von Gefahren durch den internationalen Terrorismus erlangt worden seien, heißt es

(dpa/rer)

For more infomation >> ✅ Dieselfahrverbot, Public Viewing: Achtung, das ändert sich für Verbraucher ab Juni - Duration: 4:04.

-------------------------------------------

Indianapolis Public Library offers summer reading program - Duration: 2:39.

For more infomation >> Indianapolis Public Library offers summer reading program - Duration: 2:39.

-------------------------------------------

Our topsy-turvy justice system is failing to serve the public - Duration: 1:25.

The modern obsession with equality is having some curious consequences on our justice system and its administration

Major Robert Campbell, who was cleared of manslaughter twelve years ago over the death of an Iraqi, is now being quizzed by the Iraq Fatality Investigation as a witness in the same incident

The justification is said to be the requirement to comply with the UK's human rights obligation

But what about Major Campbell's human rights? And what about the stench of corruption and greed around the lawyer Phil Shiner, struck off for dishonesty after bringing a thousand (many found to be false) allegations against British Servicemen? I am thankful that the Justice Secretary made plain

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét