Thứ Tư, 27 tháng 6, 2018

News on Youtube Jun 27 2018

Manifest destiny

The belief that American settlers were destined to expand across North America was an integral part of American culture in the 19th century

The destiny was vague

some viewed it as a mission to extend Republican democracy to people's across the continent while others viewed it as God's wish to civilize the

people of American institutions

Swing them across the new world

Various treatises were created to further this idea

buying the Louisiana territory from France and

Florida from Spain as well as fixing banners to extend American influence from sea to shining sea in this episode

We'll be looking at one more potential target for this belief system the Yucatan, Peninsula

The Yucatan had appealed to the United States for annexation as they desperately needed military assistance against a local mine

Uprising when this was brought to the United States government

President James K pulk mildly approve of the offer and it passed the House of Representatives but was blocked by the Senate

Signing the war in Mexico as their primary concern but for the sake of alternate history

Let's look at what would happen if the United States annexed the u Cataumet public, but first we need some history

The u khatallah was twice a republic during the 19th century the first in 1823 were joined the Mexican

Federation following independence

Mexico had gained independence Paine in 1821 as the first Mexican Empire

this Empire led by Emperor Agustin the first quickly had massive stability issues in

August the following year a plan to overthrow Agustin was discovered which encompass 16 members of Congress in late October the same year

Agustin had dissolved Congress as they were held like criticizing him and his policies

This led to revolts all across the empire and him eventually being deposed this also led to the formation of the Central American

Republic wouldn't encompass all lands between Mexico and Panama which have been unofficial provinces in the empire

From there Mexico was formed as a republic with the new constitutions put in place in 1824

This Constitution was repealed in 1835 putting in an era of the central's government

this centralist government caused a massive amount of rebellion and a republic declaration within the following years a

Rebellious star in the states of zakat Angus and Tabasco switch combined with a successful Texan Revolution 1835

Heavily weakened the government's control in the outer regions of the country when the French invaded Mexico in 1838

This is only furthered weakened

The central's control over the country sparking more rebellions in the Rio Grande and another rebellion to Bosco's the coton declare their independence

again

In 1841 sign the stripping away of local autonomy as the main cause

The original Central's government had accepted the bouton independence in some capacity

but when set to honest stages Kuhn 1841

He radicalize Essentials government and send an army to retake the territory

They managed to fight back against the Mexican army by were facing severe economic

Issues due to the bloc in Mexican trade and later blocking by the United States government and a war against local Mayan in

Desperation the Yucatan government pleaded with various governments for military assistance in exchange for sovereignty

But this alternate scenario what if the United States Senate passed the resolution?

to annex the Yucatan for this scenario to work within reality a few things would need to be changed first President Polk dies in

1846 shortly after the war with Mexico starts and Vice President George and Alice takes power

This isn't that hard to see happening as Polk's health was rather poor at the time and he had a habit of overworking himself

Once he left office at the end of a term

He died one month after Dallas was much more of an expansion on opportu sin nature

So long as the mexican-american war is going on

he will likely claim that acts in the Yucatan is a vital goal in defeating Mexico and

second the US government would have to be

partially blind in its

Understanding of the Mayan conflict the mind were far more numerous in any of the native tribes that the United States had dealt with

Previously and they were masters at juggle SATs. Guerrilla warfare

Was the Yucatan got some Mexican weaponry and small contingent so troops they managed to push back to mind from the major settlements

But they still had large control over the territory

This would be a constant and bloody conflict that'll last for decades in the territory in our timeline

It was until 1933

Now the last mine uprising occurred nearly 100 years from its start now, we know this in hindsight

but it is easily possible to imagine the US government seen them as an easy enemy and not taking the conflict as seriously as

It should have been so in this scenario

The USA stumbles into the Yucatan sometime in late

1847 and early

1848 and the supply of guns and a few troops allows the local

Yucatan to do some where to what they did in our timeline and I recapture significant parts of the peninsula

Though the mines Hill control large was a territory that's enough for the u.s

To convince themselves for a while that the Yucatan is easily winnable with that come to 1850

Missouri Compromise

The Yugo town would be allocated as a slave state which we still have the support of the local

population to some degree one of the large

Problems in the war against the Mayan was that they want to use them as a labor force to form the cash cups of sugar

and Hana Qin

It would be unlikely that the Yucatan would be a minute as a state in whole

More than likely it would either be kept as a popular sovereignty

Territory or a minute the whole region's the state even if the control is only nominal it's possible for this as well

Since the lengths of the works of Texas and even large parts of Texas itself aren't very suitable for slavery crop production

Regions of the northern Mexican states are possibly Baja

California as a whole will likely be annex in the scenario as well as a different

Negotiator would be able to secure more land from the district Mexican government and Santa Anas government was willing to see the underpopulated land

But what does this mean for the future?

well

the underlying political causes of the American Civil War would only be amplified in the scenario as

the drive for slave or free state balance and government would come to a head and the cause of

Occupying and protecting these new territories all of which has significant native

Populations and a large number of Catholic Mexicans would prove a major slaying point between the public it would be an unnecessary

war to wage in the Yucatan in the eyes of many and support back home for these services of

adventures likely when to hold for very long

By the time of the American Civil War the position in the Yucatan would be interesting to say the least

The territory would largely be sympathy to the southern cause as the southern population already had a style serfdom before the annexation

And the military presence would likely be of southern origin if man by a volunteer army

but the main concern for the yucatan would be of

Protection the mind would still be a present issue to the populace as you would be impossible before they pacify them just due to disease

terrain and the skill of the Mayan people

Regardless of which site the Yucatan goes with if one at all

Protection for the region would be severely limited and that weakness could very well be exploited as the military focus is back at home

but by the time of the Civil War local authorities within the newly conquered Mexican territory would likely attempt to build up a case for

reunification with Mexico

Sympathies went live with the Union or Confederate more than likely as the local population would be

considered largely second-class citizens within the United States

With many cultural and religious differences between the two

Mexico could possibly fund separate groups within its former land and

Possibly even wage war to take back the land but beyond that it's hard to say

I hope you liked this brief scenario about what would happen

If the United States annexed the Yucatan Republic if you'd like to learn a little bit more

If you'd like to hear another scenario about the United States annexing the whole of Mexico click here for the episode they did about that

Don't forget to Like subscribe and I'll catch you guys next time

For more infomation >> What if the United States annexed the Yucatán? - Duration: 8:05.

-------------------------------------------

17 states just blindsided Trump with a massive lawsuit - Duration: 3:04.

For more infomation >> 17 states just blindsided Trump with a massive lawsuit - Duration: 3:04.

-------------------------------------------

17 states sue Trump administration to force it to reunite children and parents - Duration: 1:36.

For more infomation >> 17 states sue Trump administration to force it to reunite children and parents - Duration: 1:36.

-------------------------------------------

Jeff Hardy issues United States Title Open Challenge after Nakamura injury: Exclusive, June 26, 2018 - Duration: 1:02.

What's going on, guys?

Dasha Fuentes here in beautiful Southern California,

where SmackDown Live is about to kick off in just a few.

Now, I have some breaking news for you all.

I just spoke to General Manager Paige,

who has informed me that Shinsuke Nakamura suffered an injury last night, and

there are few details that are known right at this moment.

But unfortunately, he is not medically cleared to compete for

the United States Championship tonight against Jeff Hardy.

But I caught up with Jeff Hardy and Jeff Hardy did inform me that, he wants to

defend his United States Championship tonight and has issued an open challenge.

I can't wait to see who in the SmackDown locker room is gonna rise up, and

let's see if one man's pain is another man's gain.

But all that is about to go down at 8:00/7:00 CST,

when SmackDown goes live on the USA Network.

For more infomation >> Jeff Hardy issues United States Title Open Challenge after Nakamura injury: Exclusive, June 26, 2018 - Duration: 1:02.

-------------------------------------------

Virginia ranked most patriotic state - Duration: 1:47.

For more infomation >> Virginia ranked most patriotic state - Duration: 1:47.

-------------------------------------------

Morning Routine Compilation United States Part 3 - Study Day Routine Student - Duration: 6:42.

Morning Routine Compilation United States (Part 3) - Study Day Routine Student

For more infomation >> Morning Routine Compilation United States Part 3 - Study Day Routine Student - Duration: 6:42.

-------------------------------------------

17 States, Including Pa., Sue Trump Administration Over Family Separations At Border - Duration: 0:26.

For more infomation >> 17 States, Including Pa., Sue Trump Administration Over Family Separations At Border - Duration: 0:26.

-------------------------------------------

States, immigrant supporters demand family reunifications - Duration: 0:26.

For more infomation >> States, immigrant supporters demand family reunifications - Duration: 0:26.

-------------------------------------------

Man who raped woman across two states 'not a monster', lawyer tells court - Duration: 3:42.

Man who raped woman across two states 'not a monster', lawyer tells court

Darin Wheeldon, 42, has pleaded guilty to rape, kidnap and other charges after driving the woman from Victoria to New South Wales against her will in July 2011.

He repeatedly raped and assaulted her over several days, before leaving her tied up inside a cupboard at a motel in the town of Young. During a plea hearing this morning, County Court Judge Lisa Hannan heard Wheeldon was "reforming".

"There is copious evidence to show this man is not the monster … you heard about from this complainant," his lawyer Aaron Schwartz said.

Mr Schwartz said Wheeldon had found God while in prison in New South Wales, where he was convicted for these same offences. "Religion has given him a sense of pride. He's amenable to a religious form of solace.".

'He thinks she's his property'. Religion had brought Wheeldon and his victim together. She was volunteering at a Melbourne soup kitchen run by a religious charity and had offered him a room in her home to help him during a difficult time.

At a hearing in April, the court witnessed an emotional statement read by the victim about the ordeal, in which she said she had reluctantly engaged in an intimate relationship with Wheeldon at one stage.

But today the court heard she often sought to stay with friends on weekends when she didn't have her children in order to avoid Wheeldon's persistent, unwanted romantic advances.

Mr Schwartz said his client had a "fallacious, incorrect, completely misconceived idea of what was happening" in the relationship, and "reached a point where he felt rejected".

Judge Hannan questioned this, saying: "He in effect thinks it's his right to have that relationship. "It's nothing more basic than he thinks she's his property. "Why shouldn't I take that view?," she asked. 'Where is your God now?'.

Mr Schwartz cited psychiatric reports which said Wheeldon had a borderline personality disorder. "My client was in a state of total disorder, taking drugs in the course of these events happening," he said.

Crown lawyer Brett Sonnet said some of Wheeldon's acts were "a form of torture", taunting the victim with words such as "Where is your God now?".

He said the experience had a "most profound" effect on the woman, who has since moved house, amongst other life changes.

Mr Sonnet said Wheeldon was a man who has shown only limited remorse, and that his rehabilitation prospects should be approached "in a guarded manner". The Crown said he had an "extensive" criminal history "in almost every jurisdiction".

Wheeldon was sentenced to 11 years for these crimes in New South Wales and was extradited to Victoria in April 2016 having served only part of that sentence. He has been remanded until Judge Hannan hands down her sentence in early August.

For more infomation >> Man who raped woman across two states 'not a monster', lawyer tells court - Duration: 3:42.

-------------------------------------------

New York, California among 17 states suing Trump administration over family separations - Duration: 5:41.

 SEATTLE -- Seventeen states, including Washington, New York and California, sued President Trump's administration Tuesday in an effort to force officials to reunite migrant families who have been separated at the U

S.-Mexico border. The states, all of which are led by Democratic attorneys general, joined Washington, D

C., in filing the lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Seattle. It's the first legal challenge by states over the practice

  "The administration's practice of separating families is cruel, plain and simple," New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal said in an emailed statement

"Every day, it seems like the administration is issuing new, contradictory policies and relying on new, contradictory justifications

But we can't forget: the lives of real people hang in the balance."  Immigration authorities have separated about 2,300 children from their parents in recent weeks, sparking global outrage as images and recordings of weeping children emerged

Many parents are in custody thousands of miles from their children, whom they have not been able to see and have rarely spoken to for a month or more

  After falsely blaming Democrats for the separations and insisting that only Congress could fix the issue, the president last week issued an executive order designed to end the practice under his "zero tolerance" policy, which prosecutes adults who come to the U

S. illegally.  But the states say his order is riddled with caveats and fails to reunite parents and children who have already been torn apart

They accuse the administration of denying the parents and children due process; denying the immigrants, many of whom are fleeing gang violence in Central America, their right to seek asylum; and being arbitrary in applying the policy

  A U.S. judge in San Diego already is considering whether to issue a nationwide injunction sought by the American Civil Liberties Union that would order the administration to reunite the separated children with their parents

  A Seattle-based immigrant rights group sued Monday on behalf of detained asylum-seekers in Washington state who have been separated from their children

  The states that sued are Massachusetts, California, Delaware, Iowa, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia and Washington

 Also on Tuesday, dozens of protesters showed up outside a Los Angeles hotel where Attorney General Jeff Sessions arrived to address the conservative Criminal Justice Legal Foundation

They gathered outside the Millennium Biltmore hotel in the city's downtown and chanted, "Free our children, jail Sessions!" and "No justice, no peace!"  CBS Los Angeles reports that about two dozen members of the clergy were arrested after linking arms and ignoring a police order to disperse

Rev. Felicia Parazaider said the clergy members in the street objected to Sessions quoting Bible verses while defending his border policies

  "I'm an interfaith minister and I don't profess to know everything about every piece of scripture, but Jesus' message was about love, and its all about inclusively and welcoming your neighbor," Parazaider said

  Police gave a five-minute warning in advance of the arrests, with a sergeant announcing on a loudspeaker that the protest was an unlawful assembly, CBS Los Angeles reported

By then, most of the several hundred protesters had moved to the sidewalk to observe, but the clergy members remained on Spring Street, linking arms and sitting down

  People protest in front of the Federal Courthouse the visit to Los Angeles by US Attorney General Jeff Sessions, as well as the Trump-administrations hard-line immigration policies on June 26, 2018 in Los Angeles, California

Frederic J. Brown/AFP/Getty Images

For more infomation >> New York, California among 17 states suing Trump administration over family separations - Duration: 5:41.

-------------------------------------------

States, immigrant supporters demand family reunifications - Duration: 0:26.

For more infomation >> States, immigrant supporters demand family reunifications - Duration: 0:26.

-------------------------------------------

States sue to pressure Trump to reunite immigrant families - Duration: 5:25.

  Seventeen states, including New York and California, are suing the Trump administration to force it to reunite the thousands of immigrant children and parents who have been separated at the US-Mexico border

 The states, all led by Democratic attorneys general, joined Washington DC in filing the lawsuit in federal court in Seattle, arguing that they are being forced to shoulder increased child welfare, education and social services costs

 "The administration's practice of separating families is cruel, plain and simple," New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal said in a statement

 "Every day, it seems like the administration is issuing new, contradictory policies and relying on new, contradictory justifications

But we can't forget: The lives of real people hang in the balance."  Separately, immigration-rights activists asked a federal judge in Los Angeles to order that parents be released and immediately reunited with their children

 In a speech before the conservative Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Los Angeles, US Attorney General Jeff Sessions defended the administration for taking a hardline stand on illegal immigration and said the voters elected President Donald Trump to do just that

 "This is the Trump era," he said.  "We are enforcing our laws again. We know whose side we are on — so does this group — and we're on the side of police, and we're on the side of the public safety of the American people

"  The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for a comment on the multistate lawsuit and had no comment on the Los Angeles filing

 More than 2,000 children have been separated from their parents in recent weeks and placed in government-contracted shelters — hundreds of miles away, in some cases — under a now-abandoned policy toward families caught illegally entering the US

 Amid an international outcry, Mr Trump last week issued an executive order to stop the separation of families and said parents and children will instead be detained together

 But precious few families have been reunited, and the Trump administration has disclosed next to nothing on how the process will be carried out or how long it will take

 Juan Sanchez, chief executive of the nation's largest shelters for migrant children, said he fears a lack of urgency by the US government could mean it will take months to reunite families

 Mr Sanchez with the non-profit Southwest Key Programs said in an interview with The Associated Press that the government has no process in place to speed the return of children to their parents

 "It could take days," he said. "Or it could take a month, two months, six or even nine

I just don't know."  Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Alex Azar told Congress on Tuesday that his department still has custody of 2,047 immigrant children separated from their parents at the border

That is only six fewer children than the number in HHS custody as of last Wednesday

 Democratic senators said that was not nearly enough progress.  "HHS, Homeland Security, and the Justice Department seem to be doing a lot more to add to the bedlam and deflect blame than they're doing to tell parents where their kids are," Oregon Senator Ron Wyden said

 Under questioning, Mr Azar refused to be pinned down on how long it will take to reunite families

 He said his department does extensive vetting of parents to make sure they are not traffickers masquerading as parents

For more infomation >> States sue to pressure Trump to reunite immigrant families - Duration: 5:25.

-------------------------------------------

Keller @ Large: Website Ranks Mass. The Least Patriotic State - Duration: 3:21.

For more infomation >> Keller @ Large: Website Ranks Mass. The Least Patriotic State - Duration: 3:21.

-------------------------------------------

17 Democratic states sue Trump administration over family separations - Duration: 4:00.

Seventeen states, including Washington, New York and California, sued President Donald Trump's administration Tuesday in an effort to force officials to reunite migrant families who have been separated at the U

S.-Mexico border.The states, all of which are led by Democratic attorneys general, joined Washington, D

C.,in filing the lawsuit in U.S.District Court in Seattle.It's the first legal challenge by states over the practice

'The administration's practice of separating families is cruel, plain and simple,' New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal said in an emailed statement

'Every day, it seems like the administration is issuing new, contradictory policies and relying on new, contradictory justifications

But we can't forget: the lives of real people hang in the balance.' Immigration authorities have separated about 2,300 children from their parents in recent weeks, sparking global outrage as images and recordings of weeping children emerged

Many parents are in custody thousands of miles from their children, whom they have not been able to see and have rarely spoken to for a month or more

After falsely blaming Democrats for the separations and insisting that only Congress could fix the issue, the president last week issued an executive order designed to end the practice under his 'zero tolerance' policy, which prosecutes adults who come to the U

S.illegally.But the states say his order is riddled with caveats and fails to reunite parents and children who have already been torn apart

They accuse the administration of denying the parents and children due process; denying the immigrants, many of whom are fleeing gang violence in Central America, their right to seek asylum; and being arbitrary in applying the policy

A U.S.judge in San Diego already is considering whether to issue a nationwide injunction sought by the American Civil Liberties Union that would order the administration to reunite the separated children with their parents

A Seattle-based immigrant rights group sued Monday on behalf of detained asylum-seekers in Washington state who have been separated from their children

The states that sued are Massachusetts, California, Delaware, Iowa, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia and Washington

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét