Thứ Tư, 27 tháng 6, 2018

News on Youtube Jun 27 2018

I made 3 mistakes

he turned on the music

~ I'm going to kill you ~ ¬¬'

For more infomation >> [KPOP IN PUBLIC CHALLENGE] BTOB(비투비) _ Only one for me(너 없인 안 된다) / dance cover 댄스 커버 - Duration: 4:21.

-------------------------------------------

Public Campsite Plans Near Auburn Have Neighbors Concerned - Duration: 2:42.

For more infomation >> Public Campsite Plans Near Auburn Have Neighbors Concerned - Duration: 2:42.

-------------------------------------------

HI-EMA to host public meeting today providing information on preparing for natural disasters - Duration: 3:08.

For more infomation >> HI-EMA to host public meeting today providing information on preparing for natural disasters - Duration: 3:08.

-------------------------------------------

[KPOP IN PUBLIC] BLACKPINK - 뚜두뚜두 (DDU-DU DDU-DU) Dance Cover - Duration: 3:33.

omg???!!!!

We don't know the reason for this,. only know that they are two homeless. After this, each one got out and nothing more happened!

I waited they leave to back to record

For more infomation >> [KPOP IN PUBLIC] BLACKPINK - 뚜두뚜두 (DDU-DU DDU-DU) Dance Cover - Duration: 3:33.

-------------------------------------------

Peter Strzok's testimony should be viewed by the public: Kennedy - Duration: 2:40.

For more infomation >> Peter Strzok's testimony should be viewed by the public: Kennedy - Duration: 2:40.

-------------------------------------------

Public memorial held for XXXTentacion - Duration: 0:45.

For more infomation >> Public memorial held for XXXTentacion - Duration: 0:45.

-------------------------------------------

Companies no longer racing to go public? - Duration: 5:58.

For more infomation >> Companies no longer racing to go public? - Duration: 5:58.

-------------------------------------------

Should public unions be allowed to charge fees to non-members? - Duration: 3:54.

For more infomation >> Should public unions be allowed to charge fees to non-members? - Duration: 3:54.

-------------------------------------------

Mini corso di Public Speaking! - Duration: 1:56.

For more infomation >> Mini corso di Public Speaking! - Duration: 1:56.

-------------------------------------------

Princess Charlotte's Perfected Royal Wave During Her Public Event Appearances - Duration: 3:31.

Princess Charlotte, who turned three at the beginning of May, has made one thing abundantly

clear during her most recent public event appearances: She has learned and mastered

the royal wave.

On Friday, she was spotted by Israeli Channel 2 news correspondent Elad Simchayoff showing

off the skill when saying goodbye to her grandparents, Prince Charles and Camilla, the Duchess of

Cornwall.

But Charlotte's development of the skill goes way back.

Here, a brief photo history of Kate Middleton's daughter practicing the skill.

The First Wave: Trooping the Colour 2016.

On June 11, 2016, in honor of her great-grandma's official 90th birthday celebration, a one-year-old

Charlotte performed her first wave in the arms of her mother.

The Teaching Moment: Arriving in Victoria, Canada During Royal Tour, September 2016.

Charlotte had the opportunity to wave again while arriving at the Victoria Airport during

her parents' royal tour.

She may not have been interested, but this was a valuable teaching moment.

The Confident Wave: Leaving Victoria, Canada During Royal Tour, October 2016.

In just a week, Charlotte becomes a confident royal waver while leaving the Canadian city.

The Perfectly-Synced Wave, Trooping the Colour 2017.

Now two years old, Charlotte nails the timing of her wave perfectly with great-grandpa Prince

Philip.

Poland Trip July 2017.

On the first day of her second big royal tour with her parents, July 17, Charlotte gives

a solid, happy wave to photographers while her big brother Prince George and dad Prince

William more seriously walk ahead.

The Resilient Wave, Hamburg Germany Trip July 2017.

Princess Charlotte wouldn't have the best time during her visit to the Hamburg airport

(she would later be photographed falling and being consoled by her mother), but even though

the day took a turn for the worse, she was captured doing a nice photogenic wave for

the press.

The Royal Wave That Went Viral, Visiting Prince Louis, April 2018.

This is the wave that put Princess Charlotte on the map: when she adorably greeted photographers

while arriving to meet her new baby brother Prince Louis.

The Royal Wedding Wave, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's Wedding, May 2018.

Bridesmaid Princess Charlotte was performed multiple waves that day, both in the car arriving

and out in front of photographers.

Every single wave was very cute, and of course one became heavily tweeted.

The Following-The-Queen's-Lead Wave, Trooping the Colour, June 2018.

Charlotte's wave streak continued weeks later, with the three-year-old copying Queen Elizabeth

II's wave during the Queen's official birthday parade this year.

The Both Hands in the Air Wave, Royal Charity Polo Trophy, June 2018.

Days after Trooping the Colour, Charlotte was back in waving action again at the Royal

Charity Polo Trophy match in Beaufort Park on June 10.

This time, because the event was casual and Charlotte was technically off duty, she added

her own adorable edge to it.

For more infomation >> Princess Charlotte's Perfected Royal Wave During Her Public Event Appearances - Duration: 3:31.

-------------------------------------------

Public shaming of Trump officials sparks debate over protest and civility - Duration: 13:38.

JUDY WOODRUFF: But first: President Trump's policies, and his comments and tweets have

sparked a new wave of protests and roiling anger.

However, as William Brangham reports, it's also caused some to wonder if the protests

are going too far.

REP.

MAXINE WATERS (D), California: And if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant,

in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd.

(CHEERING AND APPLAUSE)

REP.

MAXINE WATERS: And you push back on them.

And you tell them they're not welcome anymore anywhere.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Congresswoman Maxine Waters has become the latest leading voice in the

resistance to President Trump, most recently protesting the administration's controversial

zero tolerance immigration policies.

The president, a self-described counterpuncher, pushed back on Twitter, calling Waters "an

extraordinarily low I.Q. person," adding, "She has just called for harm to supporters

of the make America great again movement.

Be careful what you wish for."

Those supporters were in full force at a rally in South Carolina last night.

DONALD TRUMP, President of the United States: They're only good at one thing.

What's that term?

Resist.

It's the party of Maxine Waters.

Do you believe her?

(BOOING)

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: On MSNBC, Waters clarified that her calls for protest are not calls for

violence.

REP.

MAXINE WATERS: I didn't call for harm for anybody.

The president lied again.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: This back and forth is just the latest in an escalating debate over political

discourse and just how far is too far.

Democratic activists have aligned with Waters' strategy, openly confronting some administration

officials who implement or defend the president's immigration policies.

Last week, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen was shouted out of a Mexican restaurant.

Protesters also rallied outside Nielsen's home and the home of Trump adviser Stephen

Miller.

Over the weekend, White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders was asked to leave a Virginia

restaurant by the owner, who said her staff felt angry over the impact of the president's

policies.

SARAH HUCKABEE SANDERS, White House Press Secretary: We're allowed to disagree, but

we should be able to do so freely and without fear of harm.

And this goes for all people, regardless of politics.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Some Democrats in Congress, including House Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate

Leader Chuck Schumer, have urged more civility and a different kind of action.

SEN.

CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY), Minority Leader: If you disagree with a politician, organize your

fellow citizens to action and vote them out of office.

But no one should call for the harassment of political opponents.

That's not right.

That's not American.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: But Waters and others point out that President Trump has his own history

of inflammatory statements, some of which they say encourage violence.

DONALD TRUMP: I would like to punch him in the face, I will tell you that.

All right, yes, get him out.

Try not to hurt him.

If you do, I will defend you in court.

Don't worry about it.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: The president's musings are so frequent, The New York Times has tracked

472 people, places and things Donald Trump has insulted on Twitter.

So, is there a point where these public protests go too far?

Or are these moves the appropriate response to policies that have crossed their own boundaries?

To explore these questions, I'm joined by Quentin James.

He's the founder of the Collective PAC, which is working to increase African-American representation

in elected offices.

Chris Buskirk is a radio host in Phoenix and editor of the conservative blog American Greatness.

And former Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell is a longtime and prominent voice in the Democratic

Party.

Gentlemen, thank you all for being here.

Quentin James, I would like to start with you first.

Sarah Sanders gets asked to leave a restaurant.

Protests are occurring outside Kirstjen Nielsen's home.

These protesters seem very angry about what they are protesting.

What do you make of all of this?

QUENTIN JAMES, Founder, Collective PAC: I think it's great.

It's great for our country.

It's great for Democrats.

Listen, the administration is, you know, in the midst of working on critical issues that

are affecting people's real lives.

We are removing children from their parents at the borders.

We are, you know, talking about taxes that are benefiting the rich.

And, you know, we're talking about NFL players and their inability to protest, and, even

today, the Muslim ban.

These are real issues that get to the core of American values.

And so I think it's a great show of where the country stands, where America really is

on these issues, and, you know, we want to see more of it.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Chris Buskirk, I know you're a supporter of the president.

What do you make of these very public protests against members of the administration?

CHRIS BUSKIRK, AmericanGreatness.org: Well, I will tell you, more than more than a supporter

of the president, which I am, and happy -- and happy to say so, I am a supporter of civil

discourse.

And that is what I see being degraded daily by the advocacy of unrest, and in some cases

of violence by the left.

We look at -- we look at the Sarah Sanders incident at the restaurant in Virginia the

other day.

This wasn't just the owner politely asking her to leave, saying, I don't want to serve

you here, which I think would be bad enough.

This was the owner chasing her family across the street to where they were trying to eat

another meal.

And, look, if Democrats think this is good politics, then I say we will see you in November,

because it just isn't.

And it degrades what we're trying to accomplish as a country, fellow citizens, that wants

to govern themselves according to -- according to our reason, and not according to our passions.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Ed Rendell, what do you think this?

Does this degrade the public discourse or is this meaningful, vigorous democracy at

work?

ED RENDELL (D), Former Pennsylvania Governor: Well, I think you have to draw a line.

If people protest outside a governmental office, outside the Senate chamber, the House chamber,

or at a town meeting where a public official is called it as part of his or her business,

that's absolutely appropriate and fair.

And the left should do it and the right should do it, because that's our God-given right

as Americans.

But to interfere with someone's private life when they're going out with their family somewhere,

that is uncivil discourse.

And it resounds to the detriment of the people who are doing it.

And I agree with Chris.

If we keep doing this -- and we're not alone in doing it.

The right has certainly done it -- if we keep doing this, it's going to fire up the Republican

base in ways that nothing positive can.

And it's going to make winning the election much more difficult.

But I want to say one thing.

The person who could solve this and who bears the greatest responsibility for creating these

-- this type of viciousness is the president himself, because he has been the most vicious,

the most insulting, the most degrading of all the commentators, whether they be from

the left or the right.

And the president doesn't understand that I think the number one job of the president

of the United States is to set a moral tone for the country.

And the president should say, stop it.

People who support me, stop it.

People who are against me, stop it.

We have got to get together and move this country a forward.

And we're not going to do it by shouting hateful things at each other.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Quentin James, pick up on what Ed Rendell is saying there.

He is arguing that, if you want to protest, protest outside a government building.

Don't confront someone at a restaurant.

Don't go to their home.

QUENTIN JAMES: Listen, I completely respect Governor Rendell, but I disagree.

And here's why.

We saw during the civil rights movement when we -- African-Americans were told, don't march,

you know, don't protest.

And we saw Congressman John Lewis, at the time a member of SNCC, getting beat in the

head bloody with a billy club by the police, who were, you know, supposed to be there to

protect and serve.

But if we fast-forward today, I think we're hearing some of the similar things.

It is totally lawful.

Folks are not breaking the law by raising their voices and showing up, whether they're

at movie theaters or restaurants or even to someone's home.

These individuals are public officials, or they work for public officials.

And, therefore, they are -- the public is expressing their feelings and showing, again,

the true American values of freedom of speech, the true American values of accountability

and justice.

We are literally, again, talking about banning Muslims in this country today with the Supreme

Court's ruling.

We are talking about ripping children from their families and from their mother's and

father's arms.

This isn't a conversation about civility.

This is about life and death for many people.

And so this is, in my opinion, justified.

And, again, if Democrats want to win in November, we need to see more of this.

We're talking about not the Trump voters we need to be persuading, but a lot of Democrats

who didn't hear enough from us or see enough us from in 2016.

Those are the folks we want to see turn out in November.

And, again, I think we need to see more of this work.

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Chris Buskirk, I know you disagree with this type of action.

And -- but let's put the shoe on the other political foot.

Let's imagine the circumstances were changed, and there was someone in the White House who

you vehemently disagreed with, someone who thought whose policies were chipping away

at the very foundation of this country.

And for many on the left who are protesting, ripping children from their parents at the

border fits that bill.

Let's say someone was doing those actions that you really disagreed with.

What would do you?

What would you urge your supporters to do?

CHRIS BUSKIRK: I would urge my supporters -- and we -- this is the exact same thing

we try to do today -- which is try and win the argument.

Try and win the political debate.

Convince people why you're right, and take that to the ballot box.

That is the system that we have, and it's the only sustainable system if we want to

live in a society that values freedom or justice.

The idea that by -- the idea that by breaking that boundary between the public and the private

in some way advances the public good, I think it is self-evidently false.

And I don't see Quentin putting his home address out on Twitter right now asking -- inviting

people who disagree with him to come by his house, nor should he.

Nor should he.

And that is a boundary that I think we should all respect.

QUENTIN JAMES: But it's not about disagreement.

It's not about disagreement.

These people are literally making policy that impacts people's lives.

I'm not a public official.

So you're right.

I'm not going to put my address on Twitter for folks to come to my house and show me,

you know, what they believe.

This isn't about disagreements on ideology.

This is about, again, banning people from coming to this country because of their religious

background.

This is about banning children and removing children from their parents who are seeking

asylum and coming here lawfully.

Right?

This is not about a civil discourse.

And let's also not forget, this is the same party, the same individuals who were hanging

up Obama effigies right by nooses in 2010.

These are folks who showed up at congressional town halls in 2010 with semiautomatic rifles.

Right?

These are folks who are wearing make America great hats, going into our schools and our

churches and killing people.

Right?

So this isn't about the left is turning to violence.

No, this is about our God-given right...

(CROSSTALK)

CHRIS BUSKIRK: I remember June 14, 2017, when a left-wing activist showed up at a baseball

diamond and started shooting at a bunch of Republican congressmen.

That's what I remember.

(CROSSTALK)

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Gentlemen, can I just interrupt for a second there?

Ed Rendell, I would like to you pick up on this issue, because this is something that

the president indicated in his criticism of Maxine Waters.

He said she was calling for violence.

She says absolutely not.

Do you believe that -- as some do, that this is a slippery slope that could lead to violence?

ED RENDELL: Look, Quentin is wrong and Chris is wrong in part.

And I say that in deference to civil discourse.

But they're wrong in part, because, Chris, part of the Constitution gives us the right

to protest, not just vote.

And I agree with you, we should vote.

But we also have the right to protest.

But that protest should be done in a decent way outside of government buildings, at town

meetings, where it's part of the public dynamic.

It shouldn't be visited on people when they're doing private things, like shopping in a supermarket

or eating in a restaurant.

And, Quentin, if you think this helps us win the election, you're crazy.

I have had a lot of independents, people who were tending to want to vote Democrat for

Congress saying, I'm not voting for Democrats or Republicans.

Both sides suck.

And this type of action backfires on us, because it doesn't do anything to help us, and it

fires up the Republican base, and they're going to come out in droves, whereas, a month

ago, they were dispirited and they weren't going to come out.

We were going to have a 10 percent lead in turnout.

But the bottom line is, if this country is ever going to solve its problems, we have

to do it together.

We have to do it together.

We're never going to have 61 votes in the Senate, the House and the presidency again.

You're not going to be able to get things done unless we try to work together.

And the more that we have this hateful stuff, the more difficult it becomes for us to do

anything.

If we don't start doing things together, we're going down the tubes.

(CROSSTALK)

WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Gentlemen, I'm sorry.

We have to end it there.

Ed Rendell, Quentin James, Chris Buskirk, thank you all very much.

CHRIS BUSKIRK: Thanks.

QUENTIN JAMES: Thank you.

ED RENDELL: Thanks.

For more infomation >> Public shaming of Trump officials sparks debate over protest and civility - Duration: 13:38.

-------------------------------------------

Public Safety Director: Unpredictability Of Antwon Rose Protest Locations Presents Challenges - Duration: 3:35.

For more infomation >> Public Safety Director: Unpredictability Of Antwon Rose Protest Locations Presents Challenges - Duration: 3:35.

-------------------------------------------

Chinese court sentences drug dealers to death in public - Duration: 7:17.

A Chinese court yesterday sentenced two drug dealers to death in front of hundreds of people

The two criminals received the verdict on a sports ground in Haikou, southern China's Hainan Province, before being put to execution immediately

Many of the spectators were young students who were organised to watch the public sentencing rally wearing school uniforms, according to a video released by local news outlet hinews

cn.  RELATED ARTICLES Previous 1 Next Terrifying moment car gets hit by a train at a level

Chilling pictures show Chinese students bound and gagged. Blink and you'll miss it! Train passenger films the moment

Chinese firms cash in on Xinjiang's growing police state Share this article Share 6k shares The public sentencing event was organised by the local Qiongshan Court and the Haikou Intermediate People's Court, and was watched by around 300 residents

It was part of the government's campaign on the International Day Against Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking, which falls on June 26 every year

The first criminal, 39-year-old Cai Liqun, was found guilty of selling methamphetamine and magu

The latter is a mixture of methamphetamine and caffeine, and is a relatively new type of drug in China

Cai bought the drugs by post before selling them on multiple occasions between September and November in 2015, said the court

The other criminal, 36-year-old Huang Zhengye, was found guilty of transporting and selling methamphetamine

 He was caught in possession of 4,749.8 grams (10.47 pounds) of methamphetamine and 71,100 yuan (£8,143) in relation to drug dealing in September 2015, according to the court

The death sentences and the orders of the execution had been made by the Supreme People's Court, according to Haikou Intermediate People's Court

'Now I announce, take Cai Liqun and Huang Zhenye to the execution ground and carry out the execution by shooting,' announced a female judge on the sports ground

The two courts also gave first trials to 17 other drug dealers involving in eight different cases during the same event

 Among them, eight of them were given death sentences or death sentences with reprieve, according to chinacourt

org, citing China News. It's not uncommon for a Chinese court to give death sentences to criminals in front of a large crowd - sometimes as many as thousands of people

The authority aims to use the form to warn the public against committing crimes, especially drug trafficking

Verdicts and sentences for the criminals are normally made beforehand, and the judge would simply announce them to the masses

  Spectators at yesterday's event appeared to support public death sentencing.Pan Hui, a teacher from the local Yunlong Middle School, told China News that such events could help 'educate' and 'frighten' the students, and they could also make the students fearful of committing crimes

'Our school has been carrying out anti-drug educational campaigns constantly to keep the students away from drugs,' said teacher Pan

  However, concerns have been expressed in the past towards China's public death sentencing

Last December, the Chinese media called a similar rally in southern Chinese city Lufeng 'inhumane' and 'insulting'

A columnist, named Shen Bin, called for an immediate end on such rallies.Shen said though the local authority's purpose was to scare the local suspects and boost sense of social security, they shouldn't break humanity's bottom line which was protected by the law

 Shen argued that China's Public Security Bureau issued a regulation in 1988, which prohibited courts from publicly shaming criminals

Commenting on a different rally in Shanwei city in last June, William Nee at the Amnesty International said the event was 'tragic' and 'barbaric'

 

For more infomation >> Chinese court sentences drug dealers to death in public - Duration: 7:17.

-------------------------------------------

What Are The Rules For Making Police Body Camera Footage Public? - Duration: 2:37.

For more infomation >> What Are The Rules For Making Police Body Camera Footage Public? - Duration: 2:37.

-------------------------------------------

CIM in the Public Sector - Duration: 1:13.

For more infomation >> CIM in the Public Sector - Duration: 1:13.

-------------------------------------------

Chinese court sentences drug dealers to death in public - Duration: 7:33.

A Chinese court yesterday sentenced two drug dealers to death in front of hundreds of people

The two criminals received the verdict on a sports ground in Haikou, southern China's Hainan Province, before being put to execution immediately

Many of the spectators were young students who were organised to watch the public sentencing rally wearing school uniforms, according to a video released by local news outlet hinews

cn.  RELATED ARTICLES Previous 1 Next Terrifying moment car gets hit by a train at a level

Chilling pictures show Chinese students bound and gagged. Blink and you'll miss it! Train passenger films the moment

Chinese firms cash in on Xinjiang's growing police state Share this article Share 5

6k shares The public sentencing event was organised by the local Qiongshan Court and the Haikou Intermediate People's Court, and was watched by around 300 residents

It was part of the government's campaign on the International Day Against Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking, which falls on June 26 every year

The first criminal, 39-year-old Cai Liqun, was found guilty of selling methamphetamine and magu

The latter is a mixture of methamphetamine and caffeine, and is a relatively new type of drug in China

Cai bought the drugs by post before selling them on multiple occasions between September and November in 2015, said the court

The other criminal, 36-year-old Huang Zhengye, was found guilty of transporting and selling methamphetamine

 He was caught in possession of 4,749.8 grams (10.47 pounds) of methamphetamine and 71,100 yuan (£8,143) in relation to drug dealing in September 2015, according to the court

The death sentences and the orders of the execution had been made by the Supreme People's Court, according to Haikou Intermediate People's Court

'Now I announce, take Cai Liqun and Huang Zhenye to the execution ground and carry out the execution by shooting,' announced a female judge on the sports ground

The two courts also gave first trials to 17 other drug dealers involving in eight different cases during the same event

 Among them, eight of them were given death sentences or death sentences with reprieve, according to chinacourt

org, citing China News. It's not uncommon for a Chinese court to give death sentences to criminals in front of a large crowd - sometimes as many as thousands of people

The authority aims to use the form to warn the public against committing crimes, especially drug trafficking

Verdicts and sentences for the criminals are normally made beforehand, and the judge would simply announce them to the masses

  Spectators at yesterday's event appeared to support public death sentencing.Pan Hui, a teacher from the local Yunlong Middle School, told China News that such events could help 'educate' and 'frighten' the students, and they could also make the students fearful of committing crimes

'Our school has been carrying out anti-drug educational campaigns constantly to keep the students away from drugs,' said teacher Pan

  However, concerns have been expressed in the past towards China's public death sentencing

Last December, the Chinese media called a similar rally in southern Chinese city Lufeng 'inhumane' and 'insulting'

A columnist, named Shen Bin, called for an immediate end on such rallies.Shen said though the local authority's purpose was to scare the local suspects and boost sense of social security, they shouldn't break humanity's bottom line which was protected by the law

 Shen argued that China's Public Security Bureau issued a regulation in 1988, which prohibited courts from publicly shaming criminals

Commenting on a different rally in Shanwei city in last June, William Nee at the Amnesty International said the event was 'tragic' and 'barbaric'

 

For more infomation >> Chinese court sentences drug dealers to death in public - Duration: 7:33.

-------------------------------------------

Street Changes: Public Meeting - Duration: 0:15.

For more infomation >> Street Changes: Public Meeting - Duration: 0:15.

-------------------------------------------

Apple launches iOS 12 public beta: what's new and how to download it - Duration: 4:53.

  iPhone and iPad users can download the public beta for Apple's new iOS 12 operating software from today, with the final version set to follow later this year

 Announced at the Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) earlier this month, iOS 12 is designed to significantly improve the performance of older devices and to help users who want to cut down the amount of time they spend on their smartphones

 The beta programme allows users to trial an incomplete version of the software, so that Apple can iron out any bugs before the global launch later this year

As such, some features may be missing and system performance is likely to be more inconsistent than the final version

  Here's what we know about iOS 12 and where to download the beta:How do you download it? To get the beta, iPhone and iPad users need to head to beta

apple.com and sign up using their Apple ID account information, says CNet.  After signing up, users have to agree to Apple's terms and conditions before registering their portable device

Once that is done, users are given a link to the beta, which is then automatically installed on their device

 As with any software update, Apple recommends backing up data on the device first in case there is a bug or glitch

What's new in iOS 12? One of the standout features is that iOS 12 should greatly speed up the performance of older iPhones

  Apple's earlier handsets sometimes slow down with software updates, but iOS 12 is tipped to boost the time it takes to launch an app by up to 40%, and the camera mode by up to 70%, The Sun reports

 Other new additions include a feature that allows users to set time limits for each app, The Verge says

Once the set limit has been reached, iOS 12 will show a "time's up" message in the centre of the screen

  Although more time can then be requested on the app, it is hoped that the feature will help users reduce their smartphone use

  Apple has also improved the accuracy of its voice assistant Siri, and introduced more customisation options for animated emojis, MacRumors adds

 When does the final version launch? No official release date for the final version has been announced as yet

  However, Apple often launches its latest software shortly after its annual smartphone product conference

This usually takes place in September or October, so expect iOS 12 to launch around then

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét