Chủ Nhật, 8 tháng 7, 2018

News on Youtube Jul 8 2018

North Korea says talks with US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo were 'regrettable'

High-level talks between the United States and North Korea have appeared to hit a snag as Pyongyang said a visit by US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo had been "regrettable" and accused Washington of making "gangster-like" demands to pressure the country into abandoning its nuclear weapons.

The statement from the North came just hours after Mr Pompeo wrapped up two days of talks with senior North Korean officials without meeting North Korean leader Kim Jong Un but with commitments for new discussions on denuclearisation and the repatriation of the remains of American soldiers killed during the Korean War.

While Mr Pompeo offered a relatively positive assessment of his meetings, North Korea's Foreign Ministry said in a statement the US betrayed the spirit of last month's summit between President Donald Trump and Mr Kim by making "unilateral and gangster-like" demands on "CVID," or the complete, verifiable and irreversible denuclearisation of North Korea.

It said the outcome of the follow-up talks was "very concerning" because it has led to a "dangerous phase that might rattle our willingness for denuclearisation that had been firm.

"We had expected that the US side would offer constructive measures that would help build trust based on the spirit of the leaders' summit.

we were also thinking about providing reciprocal measures," said the statement, released by an unnamed spokesman and carried by the North's official Korean Central News Agency.

"However, the attitude and stance the United States showed in the first high-level meeting (between the countries) was no doubt regrettable," the spokesman said.

"Our expectations and hopes were so naive it could be called foolish.

According to the spokesman, during the talks with Pompeo the North raised the issue of a possible declaration to formally end the 1950-53 Korean War, which concluded with an armistice and not a peace treaty.

It also offered to discuss the closure of a missile engine test site that would "physically affirm" a move to halt the production of intercontinental range ballistic missiles and setting up working-level discussions for the return of US war remains.

However, the spokesman said the United States came up with a variety of "conditions and excuses" to delay a declaration on ending the war.

The spokesman also downplayed the significance of the United States suspending its military exercises with South Korea, saying the North made a larger concession by blowing up the tunnels at its nuclear test site.

In criticising the talks with Mr Pompeo, however, the North carefully avoided attacking the President, saying "we wholly maintain our trust toward President Trump," but also that Washington must not allow "headwinds" against the "wills of the leaders".

'A great deal of progress'.

In comments to reporters before leaving Pyongyang, Mr Pompeo said his conversations with senior North Korean official Kim Yong Chol had been "productive," conducted "in good faith" and that "a great deal of progress" had been made in some areas.

He stressed "there's still more work to be done" in other areas, much of which would be done by working groups that the two sides have set up to deal with specific issues.

Mr Pompeo said a Pentagon team would be meeting with North Korean officials on or about July 12 at the border between North and South Korea to discuss the repatriation of remains and that working level talks would be held soon on the destruction of North Korea's missile engine testing facility.

In the days following his historic June 12 summit with Kim Jong Un in Singapore, Mr Trump announced the return of the remains and the destruction of the missile facility had been completed or were in progress.

Mr Pompeo, however, said more talks were needed on both.

For more infomation >> North Korea says talks with US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo were 'regrettable' - Duration: 5:53.

-------------------------------------------

Timeline of United States inventions (after 1991) - Duration: 2:40.

For more infomation >> Timeline of United States inventions (after 1991) - Duration: 2:40.

-------------------------------------------

States Aren't Waiting for the Supreme Court to Solve Gerrymandering - Duration: 19:49.

 For Americans who want to fight the mapmaker's tyranny over politics, the U.S. Supreme Court has delivered the classic losers' consolation: Wait 'til next year

Or the next. Or forever.  The court passed up two chances at the end of its term to declare extreme partisan gerrymandering unconstitutional, sending cases from Wisconsin and Maryland back to lower courts

Then, the justices ducked again, remanding a North Carolina gerrymandering case—and making it less likely they'll confront partisan district-drawing in their next term

Then Justice Anthony Kennedy retired, depriving gerrymandering's opponents of a potential fifth vote, without resolving Kennedy's long search for a legal standard on the practice

It's a clear message to Americans who are sick of how gerrymandering lets politicians pick their voters, creates grotesquely-shaped one-party districts and encourages the partisan divide

With three years to go before the entire nation redistricts after the next census, if gerrymandering's opponents want better, fairer maps, they'll have to demand them, state by state

 Ohio just showed how it can be done.  On May 8, Ohioans voted overwhelmingly for a bipartisan plan, conceived by a GOP-controlled Legislature, that will give the minority party much more say in the drawing of congressional maps starting with the 2021 redistricting

Ohio, a key swing state, is one of the most gerrymandered states in the nation. Yet it came up with a solution, which hasn't gotten a lot of attention nationally, that could result in fairer maps and more competitive elections for Congress starting in 2022

Ohioans think their reform could be a model for how states can fix gerrymandering on their own, without waiting for the Supreme Court

 "It's very clear the courts are taking their time to determine that gerrymandering is unconstitutional," says Catherine Turcer, executive director for Common Cause Ohio, which backed the new law

"We have a very good understanding of the manipulation of district lines. There are very real consequences to rigging elections

"  The anti-gerrymandering movement is growing. "In Ohio and other states, we've looked at ways to move the state Legislature to action," says Turcer

"When we couldn't, we started collecting signatures for a citizens' initiative."  Initiative petitions—a citizens' right in 24 states—have become a key tool against the gerrymander

Redistricting reform may make the November ballot in Michigan, Utah, Colorado and Missouri

In Ohio, it was a petition drive for reform that pressured state legislators to act

Unlike most initiative proposals, which usually propose independent redistricting commissions, Ohio has kept control of mapmaking with lawmakers, at least until they reach an impasse

It also sets new mapmaking rules to thwart gerrymandering's worst abuses, such as the use of precise software to create more safe districts for incumbents

It's a model, say conservative and liberal Ohioans, that could break through partisan impasses over gerrymandering in other states

 "There have to be clear rules to prevent the skullduggery that often happens," says Ohio state Senator Matt Huffman (pictured), a Republican who helped broker the deal

"It's designed to force the majority and minority parties to get serious about what they want, to get a deal struck

"  Over the past several decades, Ohio has considered many proposals to reform redistricting

Until this year, they all failed. In 1981, Democrats controlled Ohio's redistricting, so Republicans allied with good-government groups and proposed a constitutional amendment to give the power to an independent commission

It failed at the polls by a whopping 16-percentage-point margin.  In 2005 and 2012, with Republicans in control, it was the Democrats' turn to offer similar proposals

Voters rejected them even more strenuously. Turcer, who backed those two proposals, says "almost any problem you frame not as addressing an unfairness but a partisan grab," tends to lose at the polls

Opponents portrayed reformers as "people not in power who are just whiners," she says, "or grabbing power, or just greedy

"  Still, Ohio's 2011 redistricting, controlled by Republicans, had been an example of gerrymandering at its worst

Mischievously, Republicans pitted two incumbent Democrats, Marcy Kaptur and Dennis Kucinich, against each other by connecting parts of Toledo and Cleveland, 115 miles apart, into a thin congressional district along Lake Erie that came to be nicknamed the "snake along the lake

"  Ohio has voted for the winner of every presidential election since 1964. It leans slightly Republican, but Democrats have a shot: Trump beat Clinton there by 8 points, while Obama beat Romney by 2 points in 2012 and McCain by 4 in 2008

Yet the 2011 Republican mapmakers, working in secret in a Columbus hotel suite, divided the state into 12 Republican-leaning congressional districts and four Democratic-leaning districts

The previous map had been gerrymandered less ruthlessly, creating five swing districts that changed hands between 2006 and 2010

Not so with the new map, which has performed as designed, producing 12-4 Republican congressional delegations in 2012, 2014 and 2016

Republicans won 62 percent of the state's congressional elections from 2002 to 2010; they've won 75 percent of them since

"You get at a point where the mapmakers have more to say about who gets elected than the voters," says Turcer

 The ugly map led to regrets on the Republican side too. Huffman, who authored the 2011 redistricting and took part in the campaign against the 2012 reform proposal, came out thinking there had to be a better way

"I remember saying there aren't any parameters," Huffman says. "People can't look and say, 'That's the rules

'" Even as he raised money to defeat the 2012 ballot initiative, he heard pressure for a different solution

"What I heard from Republican groups was, 'Hey, we're against this, we'll help contribute to beat that, but we don't want to keep doing this every five to 10 years

'"  In November 2014, Huffman proposed reforms that would give the minority party a say in redistricting

After a month of negotiations during the Legislature's lame-duck session, legislators reached a rare bipartisan agreement on a constitutional amendment: Starting in 2021, state House and state Senate districts will be drawn by a seven-member, bipartisan commission

If two members of the minority party don't vote for a map, it'll be in effect for only four years, not 10

Voters approved the amendment in 2015.  But congressional redistricting was left out of the deal

Democrats blamed Ohio's own John Boehner, then speaker of the U.S. House, for keeping the reform from applying to the all-important congressional elections

So liberal and good-government groups launched a petition drive in 2017 that proposed a constitutional amendment to apply the reform to the congressional map

"Once we got to about 100,000 validated signatures," says Turcer, "the state Legislature started having conversations

"  Legislators struck a new deal: a four-step process for redistricting, meant to encourage bipartisan mapmaking

In Round 1, the Legislature draws a map that would need a 60 percent supermajority and votes from 50 percent of the minority party to pass

If that doesn't happen, redistricting goes to the same commission that writes the state legislative maps, where it needs two minority-party votes to pass

If the commission can't agree, redistricting returns to the state Legislature, where a map could pass with one-third of the minority party's support

Or, the majority could pass a map on its own—but that map would be valid for four years, not 10

 The reform also creates new rules for compact districts and transparent mapmaking

Rules limit how many of Ohio's 88 counties can be split up. That'll prevent grotesque map shapes like the "snake along the lake," as well as most individual requests to move a town or a corporate headquarters into a certain district

 "We wanted to make sure we weren't dividing communities," says Huffman, "and that individual interests, whether a person or interest group, wouldn't be able to come in and easily say, 'Let's put the line there because it's good for me and what I want

'"  The armistice was strategic: Republicans and Democrats could both focus money and time on candidates in the November elections, not redistricting

Reform groups would win changes to the rules before the 2020 Census rather than take their chances on the ballot with a more sweeping reform

 "Our [plan] is very pragmatic, which will not be appealing to some folks," says Turcer

"But Ohioans are a pragmatic people, and we've been at this for a very, very long time

" Read More Fourth Estate The State of New Jersey Wants to Subsidize News. Uh-oh

Book Club What Politicos Are Reading This Summer Politics The Tunnel That Could Break New York  Skeptics say the new law doesn't go far enough

The ACLU of Ohio declined to support the ballot proposal, saying it still allows for partisan gerrymandering

But both parties endorsed the reforms. The National Democratic Redistricting Committee, led by former U

S. Attorney General Eric Holder, contributed $50,000 to the campaign for it, and Holder spoke in favor of it at a public appearance in Cleveland

"We just want the system to be fair, so Democrats can compete on a level playing field," says Kelly Ward, executive director of the NDRC

"Any effort that gets us closer to that, we want to be supportive. We want to move the needle a step in the right direction

"  Neither side thinks Ohio's 2021 mapmaking will be easy. Turcer says her coalition plans to recruit "an army of citizen mapmakers" to hold the Legislature and redistricting commission accountable

"It'll be ugly," says Huffman, "a lot of the usual back and forthing and press conferences

" But he thinks both sides will eventually agree on a 10-year map that'll be fairer than today's lines

 For now, the anti-gerrymandering movement's focus is shifting to other states. Michigan, Ohio's northern neighbor, just certified an initiative proposal for November's ballot, though it still faces a challenge at the state Supreme Court

The Michigan proposal would create an independent citizens commission to draw future maps

"No matter where we were in the state, no matter who we talked to, people see a huge conflict of interest with politicians drawing their own political lines," says Katie Fahey, the founder of Voters Not Politicians, the group behind the initiative

 In the 26 states that don't allow for citizens' initiatives, fighting gerrymandering will be harder

Reformers say sustained pressure from ordinary people will be the key to fixing gerrymandering without the federal courts' help

"In states where he the Legislature makes those decisions, we all really need to lean in on elected officials, who can, prior to 2021, make the criteria and process more fair," says Ward

"Then, once the redistricting process starts in 2021, we need a full court press of democracy to get officials to do the right thing

" Share on Facebook Share on Twitter The Friday Cover Read more 

For more infomation >> States Aren't Waiting for the Supreme Court to Solve Gerrymandering - Duration: 19:49.

-------------------------------------------

'I'm Not That Person the President of the United States Says I Am.' Man Who Was Subjected to Racist - Duration: 6:29.

 A Mexican-American man who was the target of a racist rant says he tried to stand up for "everybody that is scared to speak up" during the chilling encounter

 Esteban Guzman, a 27-year-old California native, said he was working with his mother in a yard when an unidentified white woman approached them and began yelling, calling them "rapists," "animals," "drug dealers" and "illegals," while mentioning President Donald Trump

Video of the encounter, which was posted on Twitter, has been viewed nearly 5 million times

 Guzman, who works as a systems administrator and a part-time landscaper, told CNN on Monday the woman yelled at them, "You're all illegal

Go back to Mexico."  "And I say, 'I am a United States citizen. What are you talking about?'" Guzman said in the interview

 The video does not show how the encounter began or how it ended, but Guzman said he told the woman: "I am not the person that, you know, that the President of the United States says I am

"  "I feel like people are a little more entitled to say, 'Hey … go back to Mexico,'" Guzman told CNN

"And I'm like, 'Why? I live here. I have a mortgage here.'"  In an interview with The Guardian, Guzman said incidents like this one have become "increasingly regular" since Trump became president

When Trump announced his run for presidency in June 2015, he claimed Mexicans coming to the U

S. "have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us." "They're bringing drugs," Trump continued

"They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people."  The video showed the woman flipping her middle finger in Guzman's face as he asked, "Why do you hate us?"  "Because you're Mexican," she responded

She then called Guzman and his mother "rapists," "animals" and "drug dealers."  "How many people have I raped?" Guzman asked the woman

"How many drugs have I dealt?"  "Even the President of the United States says you're a rapist," the woman responded

She went on to appear to mock Guzman's mother for speaking Spanish as Guzman explained they were working hard while landscaping

Democrats are the problem. They don't care about crime and want illegal immigrants, no matter how bad they may be, to pour into and infest our Country, like MS-13

They can't win on their terrible policies, so they view them as potential voters!  — Donald J

Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 19, 2018  Trump has used tough rhetoric to describe immigrants throughout his campaign and into his tenure in the White House

Last week, the President used the word "infest" to describe illegal immigrants entering the U

S. Critics jabbed the President for his "dehumanizing" language and rhetoric — particularly as more than 2,300 migrant children were separated from their parents along the U

S.-Mexico border as part of his administration's zero-tolerance policy. (Trump has since signed an executive order to halt the policy, but hundreds of children are still separated from their parents as a result

)  Guzman told CNN he believes he stood up for voiceless immigrants during the encounter

 "When I stood up for my mother, I stood up for everybody that is scared to speak up," Guzman told CNN

"I stood up for the little people — for the people that don't have a voice in this country

"

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét