-------------------------------------------
Public Domain Cartoons - Casper (1946) - Duration: 8:45.
[Horrifying instrumental music]
[Horrifying instrumental music continues]
NARRATOR: Now, isn't this a perfect setting for a spine-tingling ghost story?
Well, surprisingly this IS a ghost story.
Do you scare easily?
Do you have nightmares??
Do the shadows on the wall frighten you? [Chuckles]
Well then, relax because it isn't THAT kind of story arc.
And to prove otherwise, let us introduce to you a ghost who is out of this world. His name is Casper.
[Whimsical instrumental music]
[Yawning]
[Crowing]
NARRATOR: Every night, Casper's neighbors all go off on their job of scaring the daylights out of people.
Contact!
Come on, Casper! Time to go out and scare people! [Laughs maniacally] There's good boos tonight!
NARRATOR: Casper doesn't wanna go out and scare people;
he wants to be kind.
Casper sees no future in sort of life;
so, he decides to go out and make friends with somebody.
Uhh, what's your name?
Uhh, I'm Casper.
Uhh, you suppose we can be friends?
[Choking]
[Sobbing]
[Sobbing continues]
[Sobbing stops while the fox whimpers like a dog]
Wait, aren't you scared of me?
[Giggling joyfully]
You're a cute little fox.
Oh, I see. So, you want to play with me. OK.
[Upbeat instrumental music]
[Upbeat instrumental music continues]
You're my best friend. So, I'll give you an extra special name.
Ferdie. Yeah, thats right. Ferdie Fox.
[Casper counting]
[Loud gunshots]
[Tense instrumental music]
Oh, no! They're after Ferdie!
[Tense instrumental music]
[Dramatic instrumental music]
Stop! Don't hurt my little Ferdie; he's my friend!
[Gasp] A ghost!!
Zip!
Ferdie! They're gone! Where are you?
[Gasp]. Ferdie!
Are you all right?
[Sobbing] Oh, Ferdie!
The only friend I ever had in my life.
[Depressing instrumental music]
[Sobbing]
Oh, Ferdie!
NARRATOR: And so, Casper and Ferdie lived happily ever after.
[English]
-------------------------------------------
Episode 1148 | The Line: Judge Rules UNM Foundation Subject To Public Records Laws - Duration: 7:54.
>> WELCOME BACK TO THE LINE TABLE.
LAST WEEK, STATE DISTRICT JUDGE NANCY FRANCHINI RULED
THAT RECORDS HELD BY THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO
FOUNDATION ARE SUBJECT TO THE INSPECTION OF PUBLIC
RECORDS ACT, ALSO KNOWN AS IPRA, AND MUST BE RELEASED
TO THE PUBLIC.
UNM HAD ARGUED THAT AS A FUND RAISING ARM OF THE
UNIVERSITY, IT WAS A PRIVATE NONPROFIT ENTITY AND DID NOT
HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THAT IPRA REQUEST.
CAROLYN, THIS REALLY WAS BROUGHT ABOUT IN THE WAKE OF
A PARTICULAR LAWSUIT THAT WE'LL GET TO IN A SECOND,
BUT SETTING ASIDE THE SPECIFICS OF THE CASE FOR A
SECOND, TRANSPARENCY ADVOCATES ARE REALLY LOVING
THIS, AND IT COULD HAVE IMPLICATIONS, ACTUALLY, FOR
OTHER UNIVERSITIES AND OTHER ENTITIES AROUND THE STATE.
WHAT'S YOUR TAKE ON THIS?
>> WELL, I HOPE IT DOES.
I HOPE IT'S A DOMINO EFFECT, BECAUSE TO ME, IT WAS KIND
OF A NO-BRAINER.
>> IT SEEMED SO FROM DAY ONE, DIDN'T IT.
>> SO I WAS REALLY THRILLED JUST TO SEE THE COURTS BACK
THAT UP, AND HOPEFULLY THERE WILL BE A DOMINO EFFECT ALL
THE WAY DOWN.
>> IS THIS ONE OF THOSE BEHAVIOR CHANGING THINGS IN
YOUR VIEW?
TRANSPARENCY IS ALL WELL AND GOOD, BUT UNLESS IT CHANGES
BEHAVIOR, IT DOESN'T REALLY MEAN ANYTHING.
DO YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN?
SO IS THIS SOMETHING?
IS THIS A BIG ENOUGH DEAL THAT OTHER UNIVERSITIES ARE
GOING TO HAVE TO HUDDLE LITERALLY ON MONDAY MORNING
AND GO, YOU KNOW WHAT, WE NEED TO REALLY RETHINK OUR
DEAL HERE?
>> I MEAN, I DO THINK IT IS A GAME-CHANGER, YES, AND I
THINK THEY WILL HAVE TO RETHINK HOW THEY DO, AND THE
PEOPLE THAT SUPPORT THE NONPROFITS WILL HAVE TO TAKE
PAUSE.
>> ABSOLUTELY.
TOM, THE FOUNDATION HAD THIS COVER FOR A LONG TIME.
A LONG, LONG TIME.
AND A LOT OF FOLKS WERE NOT HAPPY ABOUT THIS.
WHAT'S YOUR SENSE OF IT NOW THAT THIS RULING HAS COME
DOWN?
PRETTY UNAMBIGUOUS.
IT'S NOT VERY GRAY HERE.
>> YES, I LOVE THE TERMINOLOGY OF IT.
IT'S A CREATURE OF THE UNIVERSITY.
AND TO YOUR QUESTION, YOU KNOW, IS THERE GOING TO BE A
CHANGE IN BEHAVIOR, WELL, I THINK PEOPLE ARE CREATURES
OF HABIT.
I THINK IT'S THE RIGHT RULING.
I THINK THAT THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO, AS ANY
UNIVERSITY DOES, LEVERAGES IT'S FOUNDATION TO MAKE THE
DEALS AND TO MAKE IT AND PROVIDE A NICE LITTLE TAX
HAVEN, AND AS A RESULT, THERE'S SOME TRANSPARENCY
THAT NEEDS TO GO ALONG WITH THAT, AS WELL.
THEY ARE NOT AN ISLAND TO THEMSELVES AS THEY PROVIDED
IN THE COURT DOCUMENTS.
THEY ARE ACTUALLY PART OF THE UNIVERSITY, AND I'M GLAD
THAT THIS RULING CAME OUT THE WAY THAT IT DID.
>> DEDE, MY SENSE OF IT IS, THIS IS GOING TO BE BETTER
FOR THE UNIVERSITY IN THE LONG RUN.
CLEARLY AT SOME POINT WE HAVE TO KNOW HOW THIS MONEY
IS MOVING AROUND.
>> WELL, PARTICULARLY WITH THE SCANDALS IN THE ATHLETIC
DEPARTMENT, WE NEED TO KNOW EXACTLY, AND THAT'S WHERE
THE CHALLENGE ORIGINATED.
WE HAVE TO KNOW ABOUT THAT.
BUT I'M THINKING IT WILL HAVE BIGGER IMPLICATIONS
THAN JUST THE FOUNDATION.
AND REMEMBER, EVERY STATE MUSEUM, EVERY UNIVERSITY HAS
A FOUNDATION, BUT THESE ARE STATE INSTITUTIONS.
THESE ARE, YOU KNOW, CREATURES OF THE STATE THAT
THEN CREATED OTHER CREATURES CALLED FOUNDATIONS.
BUT THE MORE THAT STATE GOVERNMENT, IN GENERAL,
OUTSOURCES THINGS -- THIS HAS BIGGER IMPLICATIONS, FOR
EXAMPLE, AND I WANT TO DISCLOSE THAT I'M ON THE FOG
BOARD WHICH FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF IN THIS CASE, AND
FILES AMICUS BRIEFS ON OTHER CASES.
FOR EXAMPLE, THE PRISONS OUTSOURCE THEIR HEALTH CARE
AND USE THE IDEA THAT THIS IS A PRIVATE COMPANY
PROVIDING HEALTH CARE TO THE PRISONERS AS A REASON THEY
SHOULD NOT BE TRANSPARENT.
SO THIS IS A LARGE AREA HERE THAT AS THERE'S MORE
PRIVATIZATION AND MORE OUTSOURCING, THERE ARE MORE
EXCUSES NOT TO BE TRANSPARENT, EVEN THOUGH
IT'S A PUBLIC SERVICE.
SO I THINK THIS RULING WILL HAVE BIG IMPLICATIONS, AND
IT WAS A SUMMARY JUDGMENT, TOO.
YOU KNOW, IT WASN'T EVEN GOING INTO THE DETAILS OF
THE CASE.
>> THAT'S RIGHT.
>> SO I'M VERY PLEASED WITH JUDGE FRANCHINI, AND I HOPE
THAT THE UNIVERSITY WILL NOT APPEAL IT.
>> YOU KNOW, I TEASED AT THE BEGINNING OF THE SUIT
ITSELF, DANIEL LIBIT, SOMEONE WE ALL KNOW FROM
NMFISHBOWL.com, HE'S DONE SOME WONDERFUL WORK, HE
FILED THE SUIT, HE HAS AN ATTORNEY THAT WENT WITH
THIS, AS WELL, AND TOM MADE THE GREAT QUOTE, IT'S A
CREATURE OF THE UNIVERSITY.
IT ALL SEEMS VERY CLEAR NOW THAT WE'RE READING ABOUT IT
AFTER THE FACT, ISN'T IT, THAT THIS FOUNDATION -- IF
YOU'RE MOVING MONEY AROUND IN THE BENEFIT OF THE
UNIVERSITY, AT SOME POINT WE HAVE TO KNOW HOW THAT MONEY
IS MOVING AROUND.
SO TALK ABOUT YOUR REPORTING AND MR.
LIBIT, AND HOW HE PULLED THIS ONE OFF.
>> I TALKED TO DANIEL NUMEROUS TIMES ABOUT THIS
AND MANY OTHER THINGS, ESPECIALLY HIS REPORTING,
BUT I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO FOCUS ON WHAT HE WAS
TRYING TO GET AT WITH THIS RECORDS REQUEST.
IT WASN'T -- OF COURSE, IT WAS THE BIGGER PICTURE THAT
THEY'RE RAISING MONEY FOR THE UNIVERSITY, BUT IT WAS
LITERALLY THAT HE WANTED TO KNOW HOW THE PAYMENTS, OR IF
THE PAYMENTS WERE BEING MADE FROM THIS PRIVATE COMPANY TO
UNM, AND UNM SAID, WE DON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH
THIS GROUP, AND THAT GROUP SAID, WELL...
SO LITERALLY AS A PUBLIC, WE HAVE NO IDEA HOW MUCH MONEY
WAS PAID FROM WISE PIES TO THE ARENA AND WHETHER THEY
WERE LETTING THINGS GO.
>> HE ACTUALLY LOOKED INTO THAT $600,000 CHECK, BECAUSE
WE DON'T KNOW.
>> HE LOOKED INTO IT AND SAID EVERYTHING'S FINE, BUT
THEN HE STARTED FINDING THAT THERE'S PROBABLY A LOT OF
SUITES, OR PEOPLE THAT OWN SUITES -- OR NOT OWN, BUT
RENT SUITES FROM THE PIT, WHETHER THEY'RE PAYING THEIR
BILLS ON TIME.
THAT'S REALLY IMPORTANT WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE
UNIVERSITY BUDGETARY ISSUES.
ARE WE COLLECTING MONEY THAT WE SHOULD BE EASILY
COLLECTING?
>> THAT'S A GOOD POINT THERE.
CAROLYN, THIS IDEA THAT REPORTERS CAN STILL GET OUT
THERE AND MUCK IT UP WITH GIANT INSTITUTIONS LIKE
THIS, YOUR SENSE OF MR.
LIBIT AND HIS WORK HERE AND HOW HE SORT OF BROUGHT
THIS TO THE SURFACE.
BECAUSE WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT IT, HE'S REALLY STAYED WITH
THIS.
THIS HAS NOT BEEN A THREE-MONTH PROJECT, THIS
HAS BEEN AN ONGOING THING THAT HE'S JUST NOT GOING TO
LET GO OF.
>> YEAH, AND I THINK WE NEED THOSE RENEGADE JOURNALISTS
OUT THERE TO SORT OF SPEARHEAD THIS.
THAT'S WHAT HE IS, AND KUDOS TO HIM FOR DOING THIS.
IT'S A GREAT RULING.
>> WHAT DO YOU THINK GARNETT STOKES IS THINKING RIGHT
NOW?
SHE'S WALKED INTO A MESS OUT HERE.
IT'S AMAZING, ISN'T IT?
MAYBE IT'S A GOOD THING FOR HER.
I MEAN, I WAS JUST KIDDING, BUT MAYBE IT'S A GOOD THING.
>> SHE COULD START OUT BEING VERY TRANSPARENT AND SHE
COULD START OUT SETTING THE TONE.
SHE COULD START OUT THAT WAY.
>> THAT'S RIGHT.
THIS IDEA, AGAIN, GOING BACK TO THE POINT ANDY MADE, IT
WAS ABOUT THIS ONE SPECIFIC THING, BUT THEN IT KIND OF
BROADENED INTO THIS WHOLE IDEA OF TRANSPARENCY.
WE'VE GOT THE LOBO CLUB OUT THERE, WE'VE GOT LOTS OF
DIFFERENT WAYS WE CAN LOOK AT DIFFERENT THINGS AND HOW
MONEY WORKS.
BUT THERE CAN BE NO ARGUMENT, IF YOU'VE GOT
$600,000 OUT THERE ALLEGEDLY BEING PAID TO AN
INSTITUTION, AND NO ONE CAN REALLY SHOW WHETHER IT
ACTUALLY HAPPENED OR NOT, YOU'VE GOT TO HAVE A CHANGE
AT SOME POINT IN YOUR CULTURE.
>> YEAH, AND BY FULL DISCLOSURE, MY COMPANY HAS
DONE WORK WITH WISE PIES AND ITS PARENT COMPANY,
SC3 INTERNATIONAL, AND I THINK THAT WHAT WE'VE SEEN
DEVELOP HERE IS JUST HOW A UNIVERSITY AND A FOUNDATION
REALLY HANG THEIR MAJOR DONORS OUT TO DRY.
SO I THINK THERE'S JUST A LOT OF CONFUSION BROUGHT
UPON ITSELF BY THE FOUNDATION AND CLAIMING THIS
DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY THAT I THINK WILL NOW GET CLEARED
UP, AND I BELIEVE THAT THE CANCELED CHECKS WILL APPEAR,
AND THAT THIS EVENT WILL KIND OF GO INTO THE ANNALS
OF HISTORY.
>> THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR TIME ON A FRIDAY NIGHT.
CAROLYN, YOU WERE GREAT.
HOPE TO SEE YOU BACK HERE.
THANK YOU ALL FOR JOINING US.
IF YOU WANT TO SHARE YOUR REACTIONS TO THIS WEEK'S
TOPICS, GET IN TOUCH WITH US HERE AT
NewMexicoInFocus.org.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
-------------------------------------------
Dozens attend final CodeNEXT public hearing - Duration: 1:30.
For more infomation >> Dozens attend final CodeNEXT public hearing - Duration: 1:30. -------------------------------------------
[IN PUBLIC + 2X FASTER] PENTAGON (펜타곤) - Shine (빛나리) - Dance Cover? by Frost & Vitória - Duration: 2:42.
For more infomation >> [IN PUBLIC + 2X FASTER] PENTAGON (펜타곤) - Shine (빛나리) - Dance Cover? by Frost & Vitória - Duration: 2:42. -------------------------------------------
Public Networks Like Airports and Hotels Risks and Solutions Part 2 - Duration: 6:11.
Hello and Welcome to my Tutorial.
Everyone wants to use public Wi-Fi: it's free, but in part one we have seen how we can easily
be tricked by a Man-In-The-Middle attack or by a Fake Wi-Fi Connection.
However, there are still two more incredible ways for hackers to get sensitive info from
You while you are connected in a Public Network but, don't worry ...I am here to explain them
all to You.
My name is Nicola Scanni.
With a degree in Multimedia and a passion for technology, I have a tendency to pass
along my knowledge in a very simple way.
In this video I will consider two more ways cybercriminals can get access to your private
data and potentially steal your identity and what you can do to protect yourself.
If You are using a VPN or Virtual Private Network like the one that you can reach by
following the link in my description below then, You are secure from all these types
of attacks.
This is why, in the video next month, I will show You how to install and use a VPN.
...but now, let's talk about the...
RISK #3.
Packet Sniffing
Yes, the name may sound funny, but the actual practice of 'packet sniffing' is far from
a laughing matter.
This method helps a hacker to acquire airborne information, select them and then analyze
it at their own speed.
To do this, it's so simple that you don't even need to be an hacker to do it and in
some cases it's not even illegal.
I'm serious.
David Maimon, Assistant Professor in the department of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the
University of Maryland, has investigated the dangers of using public
Wi-Fi with his legal team.
His team checked whether it's okay to sniff and amazing enough they couldn't find any
law preventing anyone from sniffing.
It is only illegal if when you log in to public WiFi, there is an opt-in where you agree on
their terms of use, and these terms specifically mention that you're not allowed to sniff.
Therefore, if you login to a Public Network and there is not a banner or not an opt-in
...then it's not illegal at all.
A device, like your Mobile for example, transmits a data packet across an unencrypted network,
which can then be read by a free software like Wireshark.
Yes ... I said it, the software it's free, but it has to be because it's a handy tool
for analyzing web traffic, including, ironically enough, finding cybercriminals and vulnerabilities
that need patching.
In fact, if you look it up online, you'll even find an 'how to' guide that teaches you
how to use Wireshark.
Basically, hackers or anyone, can obtain an abundance of data then, scan through it and
get important information like passwords and much more.
SOLUTION: #3 What can you do?
Once Again, you need to rely on strong encryption, so we recommend a VPN.
If you're not sure about that, make sure sites requiring private information use SSL/TLS
certificates (so look for for a website with an HTTPS).
RISK #4.
Sidejacking (Session Hijacking)
Sidejacking relies on obtaining information via packet sniffing.
Instead of using that data retroactively, a hacker uses it on-location.
Even worse, it bypasses some degrees of encryption!
Log-in details are typically sent through an encrypted network (hopefully) and verified
using the account information held by the website.
This then responds using cookies sent to your device.
But the latter isn't always encrypted — a hacker can hijack your session and can gain
access to any private accounts you're logged into.
While cybercriminals can't read your password through sidejacking, they could download malware
that would obtain such data, even including Skype.
Furthermore, they can get plenty of information to steal your identity.
Just look at the wealth of data can be inferred from Facebook alone!
Public hotspots are especially appealing for this hack because there's typically a high
percentage of users with open sessions.
The Firefox extension, Firesheep demonstrated how easily sidejacking can be accomplished,
forcing Facebook and Twitter to require HTTPS when signing in.
SOLUTION #4.
What can you do?
Again, HTTPS offers a good level of encryption, so if you really must go on sites requiring
personal information, do it through this secure connection.
Similarly, a VPN should combat sidejacking.
As an added security measure, make sure you always log out when you're leaving a hotspot,
or risk letting a hacker continue to use your session.
With Facebook, you can at least check the locations where you're logged in and sign
out remotely.
Open Settings - Security - Where You're Logged In.
Once you don't recognise?
Simply click End Activity and it will log you off that device.
This is it for today's tutorial.
Next we'll talk about how to install a VPN to your device.
If you liked my tutorial do not forget to subscribe to my Channel.
This way every first Weekend of the month, you will find a new video here on my YouTube
channel.
If you have a question please leave a message, I will answer as soon as possible.
Thank you for listening and, enjoy your privacy while using a Public network.
Ciao.
SECURE Yourself with PureVPN = https://tinyurl.com/y9z7wz4v
http://www.davidmaimon.net/
Image Credit: Wireshark Team via Wikimedia Commons = https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/01/Wireshark-1-6-2.png/1024px-Wireshark-1-6-2.png
-------------------------------------------
Helena, Lewis & Clark County conducting public survey on local parks - Duration: 1:29.
For more infomation >> Helena, Lewis & Clark County conducting public survey on local parks - Duration: 1:29. -------------------------------------------
DPHHS reminds the public to be rabies aware - Duration: 1:09.
For more infomation >> DPHHS reminds the public to be rabies aware - Duration: 1:09. -------------------------------------------
Indianapolis Public Library offers summer reading program - Duration: 2:39.
For more infomation >> Indianapolis Public Library offers summer reading program - Duration: 2:39. -------------------------------------------
Our topsy-turvy justice system is failing to serve the public - Duration: 1:25.
The modern obsession with equality is having some curious consequences on our justice system and its administration
Major Robert Campbell, who was cleared of manslaughter twelve years ago over the death of an Iraqi, is now being quizzed by the Iraq Fatality Investigation as a witness in the same incident
The justification is said to be the requirement to comply with the UK's human rights obligation
But what about Major Campbell's human rights? And what about the stench of corruption and greed around the lawyer Phil Shiner, struck off for dishonesty after bringing a thousand (many found to be false) allegations against British Servicemen? I am thankful that the Justice Secretary made plain
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét