simple maggam work blouse designs
-------------------------------------------
latest maggam work blouse designs | blouse designs | simple blouse designs | simple blouse back neck - Duration: 2:26.
simple maggam work designs
-------------------------------------------
ИСПАНСКИЙ ПО ПЕСНЯМ I ROBARTE UN BESO I PRETÉRITO PERFECTO SIMPLE I PRETÉRITO INDEFINIDO - Duration: 21:12.
For more infomation >> ИСПАНСКИЙ ПО ПЕСНЯМ I ROBARTE UN BESO I PRETÉRITO PERFECTO SIMPLE I PRETÉRITO INDEFINIDO - Duration: 21:12. -------------------------------------------
Aggression Vs. Anger - Duration: 8:44.
Hey, what's up?
John Sonmez here from simpleprogrammer.com.
Today, I want to talk about aggression versus anger.
The three ways, the three only ways that you have to deal with any problem that you're
facing or any situation that you're in.
First of all, let's talk about aggression versus anger.
Anger is a response that we have when something doesn't go our way.
Most of the time we get angry when we have some expectation that's not being met.
We expect something to happen this way.
We want something to go our way or what we consider to be our way.
It doesn't go our way.
As a result, we feel anger.
Aggression is when we actually take action.
Anger and aggression are not the same thing and a lot of people get this confused because
they—a situation goes wrong.
Instead of taking an aggressive action in response to it, they take an anger response
and they become angry.
It doesn't serve them.
It actually makes them appear weaker.
It clouds their thinking.
It prevents them from acting rationally.
Whereas, their proper response a lot of times when you feel angry or when you would have
felt angry is just to take an aggressive stance, is to be aggressive or assertive in order
to make things be what you want them to be or to change the situation in some way or
remove yourself from a situation.
That brings us right into the three ways that you can deal with things.
The reason why I want to make this video is because a lot of people react instead of respond
to situations, and reaction is anger.
Responding is usually some form of aggression or some form of asserting yourself that is
going to change your situation in some way or improve your condition, or help you to
get what you want as opposed to anger which just makes you feel bad and make bad decisions.
The reaction versus responding.
As much as possible, you want to try and respond to things in life instead of reacting to them.
Reacting is an emotional thing that happens and you're going to have instant reactions,
emotional reactions, but you have to let those go and then make a logical, rational decision
about what action you're going to take.
This is that difference between reacting and responding.
You're always going to have some kind of reaction to a thing, but what you actually choose to
do, and what you actually choose to dwell on is your response.
You want to have a calculator response.
You don't want to have something trigger you and then you instantly jump into the reaction
mode and your reaction controlling your action.
You want to have instead something that triggers some kind of reaction in you.
Then there's a pause here where it goes to your brain.
Maybe you feel the emotions or the feeling, or whatever is going on.
You let that go and instead, you reframe it and you decide how—that you're going to
respond to a situation.
You have that initial reaction, but then you have a calculator response, which comes before
your action.
Your action is not tied directly to your reaction.
For some of you, this is going to sound really, really basic, but let me get into three ways
that you can respond to anything that's going on in your life.
Any problems that would normally cause you anger because you have anger and frustration
when you feel like you don't have choices, you don't have options or things aren't
going your way.
Any time you have a problem, any time something happens in your life that you do not like,
you have one in three options.
The first option is that you can remove yourself from the situation.
You can always remove yourself from the situation or almost always.
This is one way to respond to things, is by just saying, "You know what?
I'm going to leave.
I'm not going to deal with this.
I'm not going to deal with you.
I'm not going to be in this relationship.
I'm not going to be in this room.
I'm not going to stand here and take this."
Whatever it is, you can just remove yourself from it or you can just say, "I'm not investing
in this anymore.
Emotionally, I don't care.
I'm removing myself from this and so I don't have to be angry because I don't have an
expectation.
I'm done.
I'm done."
That's one.
Removing yourself is one option and it almost always exists.
The next option is that you can change the situation.
Okay?
This isn't always an option, but in many cases, the proper response is to actually change
the situation.
Something is pissing you off.
Something is not going your way.
Someone is not doing what you want.
You can perhaps change the situation.
Now, you can't change what other people do.
You can't change how other people feel directly, but maybe you can do something about it.
You should think, is there something I could do that would change the situation, that would
change the outcome, that would change this from being something that I don't want to
something I do want.
That's your second option.
Your second reaction that you can do in response to something that has upset you.
The third one is you can change yourself.
You can change your perception of it and your own perception of that reality and decide
how you want to interpret that situation.
If something goes or something goes wrong, you can be adamant that this is what you want,
is I want things to be this way or you could perhaps say, "Look, all right.
I'm accepting how fate has dealt this hand.
I'm accepting the way things are going.
I'm accepting it.
I'm accepting it instead of trying to fight against it."
Because see what happens, in most cases, when you get angry, when you get frustrated, is
that you're seeing reality but you're rejecting reality.
You're saying, "Reality has done this.
This is what's actually happened, but I reject it.
I don't want to believe this reality.
I don't like this reality" and it gives you—it puts you in a position where you're
powerless.
That's why it's so important to realize that you only have three options.
The three options, like I said, is that you can either remove yourself from the situation.
That's still facing reality.
You seize the reality.
You don't like the reality.
You remove yourself.
Change it.
Can you change reality?
You can't change reality always, but if you can change it don't get agree.
Do something.
Take some actual action that's going to be a productive action rather than just reacting
and getting angry.
Getting angry about something.
Getting upset about something, worrying about something, it doesn't fucking do anything.
Removing yourself does.
Changing something if you can, does.
The third one: Changing your own belief or changing your own perception, or how you choose
to feel about a situation.
Accepting it.
You could say accepting reality also solves the problem.
If you can just say, "Okay.
Well, this is a new reality.
I'm accepting reality," then you're not upset.
You're not angry anymore.
You're not frustrated because you've just accepted the thing.
I'll give you a hint here.
A lot of times, the best thing that you can possibly do is just to accept the reality.
Accept what it is.
If you practice this, if you get more used to accepting things, you're going to get less
angry.
I'll give you some examples here.
I used to get really angry in traffic.
I used to be angry when I was driving or even when shit like dumb stuff, what happened like
I'd spill something or I drop something and I get angry and I get frustrated about that
kind of stuff.
You know what I started to do, is I started to create this little feedback where as soon
as I got angry about something like driving and getting stuck in traffic or someone cutting
me off, and I realize this is stupid.
All I have to do is accept this.
This is what's happened.
It doesn't matter.
It's what happened.
I accept it.
Not a big deal.
Now, I don't feel angry anymore.
Now, I feel silly if I feel angry about something that is—what am I doing?
Am I fighting reality?
Am I angry about the situation?
I'm not able to change it.
It's not effective so I might as well accept it.
Again, this is just something.
If you can't do number one or number two.
If you feel like you don't want to or you can't remove yourself from a situation and
you feel like you can't change the situation, what other alternatives do you have?
You can either—now, you're down to that whole anger versus aggression.
You can get fucking angry or you can't accept it.
I guess the anger versus aggression is really like are you going to take some kind of action.
That would be number two.
If you're not removing yourself and you're not able to take some kind of action, then
you're only left with one alternative, which is to accept it or to just be angry and be
in denial of reality.
Always choose the acceptance when you get to that position because the other one doesn't
give you any kind of benefit at all.
It doesn't make any sense.
It doesn't help you anyway to be angry and actually clouds your judgment and makes you
less in the position to make a good decision.
There you go.
That's it.
That's all I've got for you today.
If you like this video, if you haven't subscribed already, make sure you click the subscribe
button below.
Click the bell so you don't miss any videos.
I'll talk to you next time.
Take care.
-------------------------------------------
A Chic Way to Organize All Your TV Remotes | Home Made Simple | Oprah Winfrey Network - Duration: 2:31.
[MUSIC PLAYING]
You know, TaMiko, you, Mark, and the kids
have these remotes to your video games and your TV,
all that stuff. But like all over the place.
So Matt had a wonderful idea about creating
a tabletop TV caddy.
It's going to house all the remotes,
keep them in one place, and it looks pretty cool, too.
It sounds good.
Taking our pre-cut plywood, we're going to miter the edges.
What that basically means is cut them at a 45-degree angle.
How comfortable are you with working with tools?
Not too comfortable, but I'll follow your lead.
So I'm going to give you these gloves and some safety glasses.
So if you look right here.
There's a 45 here.
It's where you cut your 45-degree angle.
[SAW WHIRRING]
Oh, wow.
All right, so now if you look.
That's a nice clean, sharp edge right here, right?
This is one leg down.
OK
All right.
Guess whose cutting the next leg?
- Me. - Yes.
[SAW WHIRRING]
Nice and slow.
Nice and slow.
All right.
High fives.
All right, nice.
Time for the leather.
We're going to lay this out, like so.
We're going to shoot this in.
Have you ever used a pin nailer?
- I haven't, no. - OK.
It shoots a very small finish nail.
It keeps things nice and hidden.
Put one there.
And I'll put one on the end.
We now need to make a loop, right, to hold these remotes.
OK.
Oh, I see what we're doing.
And you're going to shoot this.
Just keep this nice and straight.
OK.
Look at that.
Oh, wow.
- Right. - It came together.
Yeah.
You ready to go assemble the legs on this.
Yes, I'll see how that's going to work out.
What we're going to do is glue and then shoot
some nails along the side.
I like that we're building things my husband
would never want to get rid of. - Oh, really.
Good.
As you know, he likes secondhand furniture.
You see how I push it in like that.
- OK. - And then squeeze the trigger.
Great.
- OK. - That's it.
What do you think? - Wow.
Nice.
One stop shop for remote control.
Teamwork makes the dream work.
It does.
I appreciate you very much.
-------------------------------------------
【MUKBANG】 Simple Pasta Using Canned Mackerel & Tomato! + Miso Soup! 5.4Kg, About 6500kcal [Use CC] - Duration: 4:52.
Hello it's Kinoshita Yuka ( English subtitles By ~Aphexx~ )
so today! tadaa using these cans of mackerel and tomato I'll be making pasta
These cans of mackerel are so convenient don't you think
And you can make some very yummy stuff From these cans of mackerel, alrighty let's get making
These are the ingredients
Slice an onion thinly
And cut up this long onion as well
In plenty of hot water add salt And boil our pasta
This is 900 grams
In a pan heat up garlic and olive oil And the onions we sliced up earlier
Once the onion start to wilt Add the cans of tomato
Also add the cans of tuna That have been drained of water
Then crush up the mackerel
Once it has cooked a bit Flavor with a bit of salt and pepper
Sadly the pasta will not fit in the pot So I will combine them in this bowl
Top it off with the remaining sauce
Then top with some onion
tadaa it's done
It's full of so much of the mackerel and looks so yummy
It weighs 4.4 W/O the bowl
I've made some miso soup as well its 1kg worth itadakimasu
The aroma from the mackerel makes my mouth water
This was super EZ to make yet you can really taste the tomatoes and mackerel nicely
its super yummy
The one good thing about making things at home Is that you can make Super huge portions like this to eat
I kind of want to spice things up a bit So I will add this ra-yu chili oil
If I had some Italian chili oil around I'd totally use it but sadly I don't have any
but this Ra-yu will probably be just as yummy
Lately I've been really into spicy foods
It adds that needed spicy kick And also that yummy ra-yu flavor
The noodles are coated in the sauce making them So yummy
I will now add some Parmesan cheese
On looks alone Parmesan cheese and tomatoes seems so yummy together
They do go nicely together The parmesan cheese add that extra depth of flavor
My hands are starting to get cramped From twirling so much Pasta
Last mouthful itadakimasu
All done gochisosamadeshita
The cans of mackerel and tomato We're very yummy
Since it uses canned mackerel It's full of concentrated mackerel flavor
Despite being so easy to make It was very yummy
It was so easy to make and so yummy won't you all Please give it a try
And as always thank you for watching if there is anything You want me to do or eat please tell me in the comment
Section below if you like this video please hit the like And Subscribe buttons BAI BAI
-------------------------------------------
Our Favorite Games Songs | Kids Songs | Super Simple Songs - Duration: 15:55.
Peek-a-boo
Peek-a-boo
Peek-a-boo
I see you
Peek-a-boo
Peek-a-boo
I see you
Peek-a-boo
Peek-a-boo
Peek-a-boo
Peek-a-boo
Peek-a-boo
Peek-a-boo
Peek-a-boo
I see you
Peek-a-boo
Peek-a-boo
I see you
Peek-a-boo
Peek-a-boo
Peek-a-boo
Peek-a-boo
Peek-a-boo
Peek-a-boo
Peek-a-boo
I see you
Peek-a-boo
Peek-a-boo
I see you
-------------------------------------------
Un simple test sanguin pourrait permettre de localiser les tumeurs - Duration: 5:48.
For more infomation >> Un simple test sanguin pourrait permettre de localiser les tumeurs - Duration: 5:48. -------------------------------------------
One Little Finger | Simple kids Songs TV - Duration: 4:24.
one tittle finger
-------------------------------------------
Simple Exercises To Fix Posture - Duration: 1:41.
Hi my name is Eric Daw for Omni-Fitt, and today I'm going to answer a question
I get often. All about posture, or how to improve your posture. So follow me as I
go through the three or four exercises of how to do it. Let's go! The first
exercise is the wall angel, where the setup is you put your heels, hips and
shoulders against the wall. After which you put your elbows against
the wall. By the way which is the most important point and you slide your arms
up and down within your comfortable range of motion. A lot of people can't
keep their hands against the wall, and if that's the case that's okay; that's what
we're working on to improve. Next let's move on to some external rotation, like
the wall angel your elbows are the most important part. You see if you let the
elbows leave your body, you no longer working the muscles we're targeting. Doing the
external rotation with your hands is great, but if you can throw in some
resistance. If you have a very light resistance band and I emphasize light,
try doing the same exercise with it. And if you notice regardless of band or no
band the elbows have to stay in your body.
Lastly let's do a chest stretch. The setup for this is your inside foot
against the wall, your inside arm about shoulder height ,and your body turned in
the direction that your feet are facing.
-------------------------------------------
Special Relativity Made Simple Even Retarded Can Understand - Duration: 7:07.
Before we begin this video is just made to make the topic so simple that everyone has a basic idea of it.
And serves as a complement to your video, lectures, reference books etc or just for fun and remember to turn on subtitles
when Isaac Newton introduced his theory of mechanics to the world
This wonderful formula is used to tell the whole story of motion and forces or not so in 20th century
When Albert Einstein suddenly thought what if bodies move and or near speed of light.
does it still hold?
lets start off with einstein's postulate on special theory of relativity.
and
postulate means
Assume fact as a basis of reasoning like the thing is not yet verified, but still goes along with it to explain something
His first postulate says laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference
This means a person or running man observing an apple falling from tree will see the same physics behind it
Whether it's velocity or time it takes to fall
His second postulate says the speed of light in vacuum is same in all inertial frames
This means whether the UFO astronaut the light moves just as fast as they are measured or perceived
The light must be in vacuum, so it has to be in space
These two postulates serve as a foundation to the concept of special relativity
Alright, let's introduce the idea of simultaneity
The idea is like when you woke up at 7:00 a.m.
2 events happen, which is when you woke up and the clock shows seven. these two events
happened at the same time, which caused simultaneity.
Let's consider simple scenario
someone in the train known as inside man
Moves past a person standing outside on the platform known as outside man
Imagine there's antman standing beside inside man and is about to jump
The inside man measure the time the antman takes to jump up and back down outside man
also Do the same thing as he did but surprisingly they have different result?
The inside man sees antman in totally vertical motion that is just up and down
But the outside man widening his eyes with red aura kinda cool, right?
Anyway, sees antman moving diagonally
Because every time the train moves antman moves by the corresponding amount
So who is right? the answer is both are right it all depends on their point of view
Here's an analogy imagine
There's two people facing each other suddenly another people run past between them
One of them says that the person is going right the other sees left. you get the point now
The key point here is that the outside man measure time slower than the inside man.
the difference in time is expressed in this formula as
Delta t equals delta T. Naught over square root of 1 minus u square over C square
Where delta T
Is time measure in observed frame, delta t is time measure in rest frame and K is called Lorentz factor
Look at the results I had calculated. No matter what speed is as long as its
Relativistic speed that is at least 10 percent of speed of light
It's always bigger than the time taken by the observer at rest.
The simple thing to know is that whatever moving past a body at rest
Nearly, or at speed of light the moving is bus and the stationary is slow. It's that simple.
This phenomena is known as time dilation, which means time is larger for an observer at rest.
Another scenario exists when a body of a certain length is different for different observers.
For example the inside man measures the length of the line to be 1 meter
But outside man sees it as it's shorter than 1 meter
This is known as length contraction
The formula is l equals L naught divided by K
The result for length contraction is displayed. notice that this time, it is not divided by the corresponding
Lorentz factor and
Anything divided by a number bigger than one results in smaller number
Hence the length of observed by the also address is always shorter than the one in moving frame
What if the line is perpendicular to the motion of the Train?
It doesn't change because the line is not parallel to the motion of the Train
As a result of all of this to analyze the motion or time of a body relative to another
We use a different transformation formula than the one in relative velocity
This is known as Lorentz
transformation
This is the list of the formula. usually the only difference is
you [PAUSE please] multiply the relative velocity formula with the lorentz factor. it uses the idea that space and time are no longer separate variables and now dependent on each other and
Union of fusion is needed between the two and is called space-time
how to imagine space-time
Look at this picture not this time the gap between two second
And the second interval increases as the shape and hence space bends
Then it is extended to this picture
And finally this grand scale this shows that different parts of the universe may have
different timescales
tips on solving special relativity problems
Always find a way and use the inside a second example to fit into the problems that you are trying to solve
Whether it's twin paradox
or
Pole in a barn. Here's how you do it?
You remember the example used to explain time dilation?
then you simply just imagine the assignment as the man holding the phone and
Inside man as the observer on the platform. It's actually simple and does the trick
All it takes now is practice
You then extend this idea to other problems and by doing more practice exercises
This comes naturally to you
after all Einstein once said
Imagination is more important than knowledge
All right it ends here. Now. Thank you for watching. Hopefully. There'll be more of this coming soon
-------------------------------------------
Kruskal's Algorithm: Step-by-Step Explanation - Short & Simple - Duration: 3:53.
In this video, I show you how Kruskal's algorithm finds a minimum spanning tree in a weighted
undirected graph.
A spanning tree is a connected and acyclic subgraph that contains all vertices.
So for example, the vertices and edges in orange form a spanning tree.
The weight of the spanning tree is the sum of all edge weights, in this case the weight
is 47.
The goal of Kruskal's algorithm is now to find a spanning tree that has the smallest
possible weight.
Let's go through Kruskal's algorithm step-by-step.
The algorithm simple adds an edge with lowest weight in every iteration such that no cycle
is created.
The smallest weight is -4, so we add edge "d-e".
Now, the second-smallest weight is -1 and we add edge "f-g".
So we now just continue in the same way, we add edge "a-c" with weight 2 and edge "b-c"
with weight 3.
The next edge that we would like to add is edge "a-b" with a weight of 6.
But if we add this edge we would create a green cycle on vertices "a", "b" and "c".
So that's why we do not insert this edge, instead we colour it red and ignore this edge
from now on.
Instead we add edge "c-e" which has a weight of 7.
Now among all remaining edges, there are three edges which have the same lowest edge weight
of 8.
We are not allowed to pick this edge "b-e", because if we do so then we would create a
green cycle again.
The other edges with weight 8, namely "d-f" and "e-f", are fine.
For those edges we have free choice, I pick edge "e-f".
Now we can't add any more edges without creating a cycle.
That means that Kruskal's algorithm is now finished and has found this minimum spanning
tree with a weight of 15.
So finally here is some information about Kruskal's algorithm.
Kruskal's algorithm is also a so-called greedy algorithm.
The graph must be a connected, weighted and undirected graph.
Kruskal's algorithm works also if the graph contains some edges with a negative weight.
In general, the minimum spanning tree is not unique, so there can be different minimum
spanning trees for a graph.
But, if you have a graph were all edge weights are different then you can be sure that there
is exactly one minimum spanning tree.
The time complexity depends mainly on two components: there is the component for sorting
the edges and there is also the component for checking if adding an edge would create
a cycle.
Sorting edges is the dominant component so that the total time complexity is number of
edges times the logarithm of the number of edges.
This also means that Kruskal's algorithm is rather slow if the graph has many edges.
But on the positive side, Kruskal's algorithm is quite easy to implement.
That is all the key information about Kruskal's algorithm.
I hope you could take away some bits and pieces from this video!
If you did, please subscribe to this channel and if you want to find out more about algorithms
on minimum spanning trees, Prim's algorithm here is the right thing for you!
Thanks, and bye bye.
-------------------------------------------
The real Secret to Getting More Women Hired In Hollywood Is Mind-Numbingly Simple (Part 2) - Duration: 12:00.
The real Secret to Getting More Women Hired In Hollywood Is Mind-Numbingly Simple
In 2018, it's a truth universally acknowledged that women who work behind the scenes in Hollywood have it rough.
Like, really, really, rough. In fact, in 2017, women held just 18 percent of key behind-the-scenes roles in the top 250 grossing films of the year.
It's a sad reality, and no one is more aware of these dismal statistics than Amy Adrion, the director of Half the Picture, a documentary about female directors in Hollywood that debuted at Sundance Film Festival this year.
But luckily, Adrion has the solution to getting more women hired behind the scenes — if only Hollywood would listen.
"Directors are in a gateway position.
When you have a woman director, statistically it's been shown that you'll have more women producers, cinematographers, editors — more women in key positions," she says during the Sundance premiere party for her film.
"If you want to make a change, hiring a woman director can open those doors for other women.".
And she's right.
A 2015 study from Martha Lauzen, the director at the Center for the Study of Women in Television, found that female directors are more likely to hire other women in behind the scenes roles.
The study examined 700 films released in 2014 and found that on film sets where one-third or more of the producers and directors were women, the number of writers, editors, and cinematographers that were women more than doubled.
And while it seems like a simple enough solution to hire female directors, getting women to helm major studio films is no easy task.
They are more than willing, but Hollywood may not be willing to give them a fair shot.
"The numbers for directors are horrible. About four percent of top feature films are directed by women," Adrion says.
Luckily, 2017 boasted slightly higher numbers than Adrion quoted.
According to the 2017 Celluloid Ceiling study, 11 percent of the top 250 grossing films were directed by women.
Even so, 11 percent is nothing to celebrate.
"You talk to people in Hollywood and they'll say, 'Well this is a business. This isn't a charity.
We aren't here to give jobs to people just because.' But statistically, research shows that the films made by women make money, so that argument isn't bolstered by facts," Adrion says.
The statistics are alarming: If you look at the summer of 2017 alone, female directed films utterly crushed it.
Wonder Woman's opening weekend marked the highest ever for a female director, Stella Meghies Everything, Everything brought in 11.7 million its opening weekend, and Rough Night, directed by Lucia Aniello, brought in $8.1 million its premiere weekend.
Clearly, when given the chance and the resources, women can bring in serious bank.
"You have hitmakers like Catherine Hardwicke (Twilight), Kimberly Peirce (Boys Don't Cry, Carrie) and Sam Taylor-Johnson who did Fifty Shades of Grey.
these women who had blockbuster films, and then they don't get that next big film.
It's like, what are the goal posts here? What standards are we working with for women? They are definitely different than men.".
Hardwicke, who broke box office records with Twilight — try $400 million worldwide — famously took a pay cut for subsequent projects.
She told Variety: "I guess I thought after the success of Twilight, I might have had a bigger opportunity instead of a smaller one.".
And this was someone who had proven they could make a wildly successful film.
It's even tougher for female directors who, god forbid, have a flop.
"This is a business where no one bats a thousand," Adrion says.
"All of your favorite directors — Christopher Nolan, Paul Thomas Anderson, whoever — they've all had failures, but then they make that next big film.
Women don't get that chance — if you have one failure you're in director jail forever.".
While the stats are undeniably disheartening, Adrion, who spent two years making this documentary by interviewing some of the most well-known female directors working today, isn't entirely pessimistic about the future for women behind the scenes.
"I'm an optimist.
I don't think we've seen any change in feature films statistically, but there is this movement.
You have directors like Ava Duvernay and Jill Soloway talking about why inclusion is so important.
Natalie Portman is speaking up at the Golden Globes.".
But for the statistics to really change, Hollywood gatekeepers need to take note.
"It's great to have panels about it, mentoring programs, initiatives, but ultimately you have to start hiring women.
People who can hire women need to hire women.
They need to fund women's stories.
We as the audience need to support women and diverse stories.".
The solution is simple, but the path to getting there will be lined with obstacles.
So if the next Star Wars movie wants to give a female director a shot, it would likely employ more than one woman in need of a job.
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét