Thứ Bảy, 31 tháng 3, 2018

News on Youtube Mar 31 2018

Alexandra: "Today, we're at Palouse Falls in Washington State.

We are going to walk with the little one.

As you can see, it is pretty nice.

We are going to go and see the falls a little closer." [Laughs]

For more infomation >> Hiking Palouse Falls State Park, Washington - Duration: 2:37.

-------------------------------------------

Ben 10 Washington B.C Episode 2 - Sophie Bell - Duration: 18:08.

♥ Like + Comment + 2 shares helps channel!

This will rip that door open like it was

Let me tell you something when Tennyson I was

Coverage of the National Junior Tennis Championships, we're an exciting semifinal round is in progress

Newcomer Julie Yamamoto

Game set ma

You made a big entrance and completely blew her concentration. I can't help if I'm famous right

I'm sorry it won't happen again

Explain yourselves we attempted to show initiative King Orion. How do we know exactly where?

Actually, it's almost funny when you think about it

Do you know a more hands-on approach

Come on Gwen wait up

Forever Knights like that's a big riddle

They're trying to steal some piece of alien technology

So they can slay dragons or take over the world or whatever?

So now we just ignore them when they try and take me you're either the bravest man alive or the dumbest what?

Okay, the dumbest

It's opening today

And there's a 2:00 p.m.. Show just a few blocks don't even think about it. You can't be in two places at once

I

Didn't really think that was going to work

Why not you're a smart guy. You don't give yourself enough credit for that. I don't know it's

perfect and

you

What we were thinking you could go watch Julie play in the Turk bed Julie's match is about to start, I'm here

Why don't you put a sock in it?

Whoa what's with all the attitude. I've been classic miss me

Didn't you want to go investigate the forever Knights robbery?

Yeah, but Gwen's pretty mad at you. You better win might seem inflexible, but her heart is as big as all outdoors

she'll forgive my

Julie's covered Kevin's covered and I'm off to the movies

Onward my Knights this time nothing most of us from gaining power beyond all reckoning

Bad

Hey other girl you're a terrible tennis player and my girlfriend's gonna kick your butt

Then any comment on Wolverines editorials he says you're a menace. Yeah, I say TVs a dead medium

Sorry, man, you know it's true

We'll talk later sorry Raph

But do I have corndog on my face?

No, I'm just thinking about how long we've known each other

Why?

Because mad or hungry or when I have to go to the bathroom not to mention

There's probably still unresolved tension from that whole hacking the Omnitrix thing that turned you into a monster

Which believe I blew that last shot. It's okay. You're still ahead

Just remember. I'm here for you Kevin's here for you

Ben's here for you all Julie wanted was a little support, but no you're too busy being a celebrity chick magnet

Come on. It's just a dumb old tennis game besides. She was supposed to loot

We haven't even begun to unpack the teams interpersonal dynamics

What with your relationship with Gwen who is after all my cousin?

Which means you and I might someday end up related, which could stop understanding

Stop apologizing stop talking about your feelings. I just want to find some forever Knights and pound them

It can burn a hole through ten. Feet of solid you must be the Knights we better suit up

It's Ben Tennyson the alien changeling

Signs clearly say do not touch the exhibits

Signs, that's the best you got

Where's the usual smack-talk first? We crack on the bad guys then we trash them it's what we do

How could you let your guard down like that I'm not myself today

Hello I hate to interrupt everyone's evening is everyone having a good time

this movies

Heads up one side hero stuff to do

What am I a GPS I

Wasn't running from my life boys, it's slammer time

Is a lot less fun than I thought it would be

Holy mouth Kevin will I'll be right

You come back from three

I can't move what black magic is this no magic just my natural magnetism

Which isn't to say?

Rest in pieces hey Kevin you're totally right about the smack talking I

Know you're off fighting bad guys. I was upset

But I guess that's a deal when you decide to date a superhero

Julie I promise I'll make it up here match

well, that's just

Nice

You

What's the plan

I'm thinking we are in trouble

Okay, let's work through this a Grigore has three something

I only expect to live another three thousand years. I don't have time to wait for you to learn something as

failures should

Aggregate the last piece he will go to the forge of creation, which you still won't tell us anything about it is beyond your comprehension

But we are that's not helping us find a Grigore, so it's not important Ben Tennyson you are

Absolutely correct. He is he and Ben Tennyson, no pressure

That's the way to travel

You'd be right that thing is huge. How are we supposed to know what to do next? I don't know

I'm throwing everything we got at him, but he's out of range and pulling away. He's too fast for us

She'll still fly probably reassuring shouldn't there be some sort of I

Can't get a good read on a Grigore if your radars on the fritz. I want to be ready for anything

Hey, maybe we should split up cover more ground

Great idea that way a Grigore can pick us off one at a time

Or we could stay together

You ever get the feeling the exact same thing has happened to you before

Wait a minute this was definitely the door to the hangar. Are you sure Ben's always sure about that kind of stuff so

What the rooms are moving admit it?

Take a look back the way, we came for what humor me

Kevin got it right before the rooms are moving. How are we supposed to find a Grigore in this maze care?

What now you made the door mad

If you're gonna give me the wrong guy all the time why do you even have a dial?

Then we should get out of here if the room is booby-trapped

Before busted through no I get it

I do feel better

As long as the Ultimatrix works, I do so no plan really I'm gonna try it old favorite

That's part of why I like her doesn't mean I don't want to take care of her anyway

Sometimes it's hard to believe you're that same little kid. I used to drives don't talk about this stuff

Unless you

Want to talk about this stuff?

Okay, I like the Kevin that Gwen sees when she looks at me more water

It's burning the floor and that's what your armors made of

One of Tennyson's lackeys not even worth the bother

Hey, I'm talking to you, but I have no interest in anything you might say

When we found you in all that ice he's trying to say he really likes you I know that already

Why don't you guys get a room this place is full of Hope, which is the same way I found a Grigore

finding him again might be impossible wandering around in this maze I

Don't think so there's a pattern

Spill it's the guard things

What does a deathtrap need with guards huh the guards only appear when you're going where you're not allowed to be towards the map

Uh-huh so we ignore any door that opens forth come on three fire rooms in a row a while back

you're complaining that you were cold cuz when I was frozen and

You've got a deadly robot spider crawling on nothing in here

Of the final piece of the map of infinity

Welcome Ben Tennyson oh

Hi, your presence would be proud

You know my grandfather

only through legend

Professor paradox who built this place spoke?

What was that?

This place has served its function whatever else happens protect us

How do you know which way the map piece it just knows the homing we should have been gone like five minutes ago

I don't care what he said. I can't just leave the Sentinel behind

not a miss I

Will never tell unfortunately for you

Few minutes a bear

You were meant to save not me

My whole purpose was to protect that map. I thought I'd succeeded

but

We lost a battle Ben you hear me just a battle

But we're not gonna lose the war a Grigore has the map but we're not gonna just

For more infomation >> Ben 10 Washington B.C Episode 2 - Sophie Bell - Duration: 18:08.

-------------------------------------------

Breaking Out Of Washington: Turns Out It Was Obama, Not Comey! This is Unbelievable! - Duration: 6:19.

For more infomation >> Breaking Out Of Washington: Turns Out It Was Obama, Not Comey! This is Unbelievable! - Duration: 6:19.

-------------------------------------------

Inside the latest diplomatic showdown, staff shakeup at the Department of Veterans Affairs - Duration: 23:30.

ROBERT COSTA: A standoff with Russia, talk of pardons, and another Cabinet shakeup.

I'm Robert Costa. Inside the latest diplomatic showdown and changes at the

Department of Veterans Affairs, tonight on Washington Week.

STATE DEPARTMENT SPOKESPERSON HEATHER NAUERT: (From video.) Russia is responsible for

that horrific attack on the British citizen and his daughter. Once again, they have

broken the Chemical Weapons Convention. They don't need to act like a victim.

ROBERT COSTA: Days after the Trump administration announced it would kick out 60

Russians, Moscow kicks back, telling the same number of U.S. diplomats to leave and

shutting down a U.S. consulate. And as the international community unites in solidarity

to hold Russia accountable for a nerve gas attack in the U.K., the Kremlin raises global

tensions with its test launch of a new intercontinental ballistic missile named Satan 2.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: (From video.) You're fired!

ROBERT COSTA: President Trump gives Veterans Affairs Secretary David Shulkin his walking

papers weeks after damaging reports revealed he used taxpayer money to pay for a European

trip with his wife. Will the president's personal physician, Navy Rear Admiral Ronny

Jackson, be confirmed to take over the second-largest department in the federal

government? Plus, new revelations surrounding the Russia probe.

Did President Trump's legal team consider pardons for a former campaign advisor?

We discuss it all with Mark Mazzetti of The New York Times, Shawna Thomas of VICE News,

Andrea Mitchell of NBC News, and Jon Decker of Fox News Radio.

ANNOUNCER: This is Washington Week. Once again, from Washington, moderator Robert Costa.

ROBERT COSTA: Good evening. The friction between Russia and the West is escalating after

the Trump administration and a number of U.S. allies moved to expel Russians over a nerve

agent attack on a former Russian spy inside the United Kingdom.

Russia announced it would expel 60 U.S. diplomats and close the U.S.

consulate in St. Petersburg in retaliation for a similar move by Washington.

So far more than 20 countries have kicked out more than 100 Russian intelligence officers

in solidarity with the U.K. The backstory: The Kremlin is believed to be behind a

chemical poison attack on a former Russian spy and his daughter who live in England.

Both are now recovering. Yet, tensions flared again on Friday when Russia tested its

new intercontinental ballistic missile.

President Vladimir Putin claims the new ICBM is capable of reaching any point on the map.

Andrea, we have been studying the president and reporting on him and Russia for over a

year now, and we've seen these warm overtures and now this new chill. What to make of it?

ANDREA MITCHELL: The president is sending mixed messages. First of all, it's been

more than three weeks since that attack and he has not said one word about it.

He didn't say a word about it to Vladimir Putin on the phone, and much to the surprise of

his own advisors he congratulated Putin for his sham election.

Now, we are told by people in the White House that he's actually been tougher on the

phone than has been let out - that he actually said: If you want an arms race, I'm going

to win that arms race - but that's not explicit. And what foreign policy experts,

Democrats and Republicans, former officials, current diplomats are saying is he has to

speak out. And without his voice, this is not going to be received in Moscow by Putin,

anybody else in the Kremlin. It doesn't have the power of the voice of the president of

the United States. And it's extraordinary that these expulsions have taken place - the

worst in history. Worse than at anytime in the Cold War. And we're getting involved in

this tit for tat. But what we really ought to be doing is speaking out more forcefully

from the Oval Office and imposing economic sanctions on Putin's cronies, the oligarchs.

ROBERT COSTA: But when you look, Jon, at the White House's response, is the U.S.

now in sync with Western Europe in its - in its strategy towards Russia?

JON DECKER: Well, in terms of what they did this week, the answer is yes.

There was unity. There was a coalescing of what the U.S.

and its allies - NATO, Australia even - coming together and booting out, essentially,

these Russian diplomats who all of these countries said were operating as spies in their

country. But to Andrea's point, there is this schizophrenic type of approach that the

administration appears to be taking on Russia.

And we hear it from Republicans - John McCain, very critical in his statement when the

president came out and congratulated Vladimir Putin on his election victory.

Mitch McConnell also having a much harsher tone towards Russia.

That's what they want to see from the president. And they haven't seen that so far.

MARK MAZZETTI: And one of the interesting things about this episode is there actually was a

tit for tat. The Russians responded, right? The last time was at the end of the Obama

administration, where the Obama administration expelled Russian diplomats for the

election interference. And notably, Putin didn't respond. And that led to all sorts of

questions of why not. And the phone calls the Michael Flynn had with the Russian

ambassador. So this is interesting, the Russians have responded.

And it does sort of signal the escalation here.

SHAWNA THOMAS: And the mixed message is even bigger than that.

We have an omnibus, an appropriations bill that the president signed, that had multiple

things in it that were against the Russians. It tried to codify more of the sanctions.

It provided a lot of money for the Ukrainians to be armed.

And what you have is not just in Moscow, but around the world America is sending multiple

messages and no one quite knows what to do with it, even if in this one case we seem to

be in line with at least the U.K.

ROBERT COSTA: Andrea, when you think about messages, you look at the president's comment

this week on Syria, and maybe moving U.S. troops out of there pretty soon.

What kind of message does that send to Russia?

ANDREA MITCHELL: Well, in fact, he has been saying that privately, we understand now, to

his aides. He wants out of Syria. And the message to Russia is that Russia is now in

charge. Russia and the Iranians, ironically. It makes no sense.

It's also really pulling out the rug from our Kurdish allies there, the Syrian Kurds.

And that is very much in the interests of Erdogan, the strongman in Turkey, who views

those Syrian Kurds as terrorists and enemies. So we are really not only

retreating from the world, from world leadership in Europe, but also in Syria.

SHAWNA THOMAS: I mean, it's telling - it's telling Putin to stick around in Syria and

see what he can get out of it, basically.

JON DECKER: But there's some hope that Republicans feel with this new national security

team coming on board. Mike Pompeo, if he's confirmed, the CIA director as the new

secretary of state, and John Bolton as the new national security adviser who will

come on board in April, that they will take a more hardline approach towards Russia

and convince the president to speak out on these issues more regularly.

ANDREA MITCHELL: One point about Bolton, though, is that there's a lot of concern, even

among some people at the State Department and at the Pentagon - Jim Mattis has tried very

hard to show that he is on board with Bolton - but privately there's a lot of sourcing

from other people in the military that Mattis is very uncomfortable with this because of

Bolton's posture towards the Iran nuclear deal.

ROBERT COSTA: Well, Andrea, we saw the exchange they had at the Pentagon this week. When

the defense secretary introduced himself to Bolton, he said: I'm meeting the devil incarnate.

ANDREA MITCHELL: And he knew the cameras and the microphones were there.

I think he was trying to defuse reports that he was very concerned about it and that he

might even leave the administration. The interesting thing about Pompeo is that even

though he's hardline and has been very hostile to Iran and the nuclear deal and a lot

of the diplomatic initiatives from the Obama administration, the State Department is

throwing out the welcome mat. They are so happy.

Finally, a secretary of state who can talk to the president, actually knows the policy

that the president wants, and actually believes in the political process, is a former

politician - a former Kansas Republican congressman and might actually understand how to

govern and how to lead a large bureaucracy.

SHAWNA THOMAS: And State Department rank and file, some people have told me, even if

there are people who don't necessarily agree with President Trump's policies but do their

job at the State Department, they think Mike Pompeo will actually put people in the open

positions. They're just happy that maybe their offices can be fully staffed and

they can actually do their jobs, to a certain extent.

JON DECKER: And our allies are pleased by this because when they speak to the country's

chief diplomat, they want to know that he is speaking on behalf of the president.

Mike Pompeo has a very close personal relationship with President Trump.

And that mollifies them. That comforts them to know when he's speaking, he's

speaking on behalf of President Trump.

ROBERT COSTA: Let's turn from Russia abroad to the Russia issue here at home, because

The New York Times broke the story this week that President Trump's personal defense

attorney, John Dowd, who resigned just last week, reportedly dangled pardons for two key

defendants in the Russia probe.

The Times wrote that Dowd spoke with the lawyers representing former National Security

Adviser Michael Flynn and former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort about presidential

pardons last summer, before Manafort was charged with financial crimes and before Flynn

cut a deal - a plea deal with Special Counsel Robert Mueller, in exchange for pleading

guilty to lying to the FBI. Last December, President Trump was asked if he would

consider granting Flynn a pardon. He left the door open.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: (From video.) I don't want to talk about pardons for Michael

Flynn yet. We'll see what happens. Let's see. I can say this, when you look at what's

gone on with the FBI and with the Justice Department, people are very, very angry.

ROBERT COSTA: When you look at your reporting at the Times, Mark, John Dowd, who is now

gone from the legal team, he has denied having these discussions.

But what did your story reveal about what happened?

MARK MAZZETTI: The fact that this issue was raised by Dowd to the lawyers for Flynn and

Manafort indicates that there was concern in the legal team about what they might say if

they were to cooperate with the special counsel. Now, as we said, Flynn has agreed to

cooperate. Manafort has not. But certainly, this period of time is important, the summer,

the fall of 2017. Mueller's building a case against both people, and the White House is

clearly concerned. What we don't know is a couple things.

The specifics of the conversations. And also, whether President Trump put Dowd up to it.

Did he encourage Dowd to make those calls? Those are still key questions that we don't

know, because it gets to this issue of is it - you know, is there - is there anything

illegal or untoward about this? The president has broad powers to pardon. He can pardon

anyone he wants under the Constitution. However, if you're dangling a pardon in exchange

for something else, possibly to buy someone's silence let's say, that's where you get

into obstruction of justice territory, witness tampering, et cetera.

ROBERT COSTA: Do we have any sense of if Bob Mueller's team is looking into Dowd's role?

MARK MAZZETTI: Well, we reported that he has talked to witnesses who were in the White House

about the pardon issue, about what discussions were held at the White House on the issue

of pardons. So it's certainly an issue that he's looking at.

ANDREA MITCHELL: And one of the things that's so extraordinary about Mark and his

colleagues' terrific reporting on this is that usually pardons are offered after

adjudication. Usually they're requested by the person involved, not dangled this way.

And there's a whole office about pardons in the Justice Department which is supposed to

coordinate with the White House counsel's office, not something that is offered by the

private attorney of the president of the United States.

ROBERT COSTA: When you think about Dowd - I know it's inside baseball, Jon - I mean,

John Dowd, he's a white-shoe Washington attorney. He worked for the president.

Now he's not there. But he matters in a sense that the president has been negotiating

with the Mueller team a possible interview. And John Dowd has been a voice in the

president's ear saying: Do not interview with the Mueller team. Now that he's gone,

are we going to see the president maybe sit down with Mueller in the coming weeks?

JON DECKER: I doubt it. I'm going to put my lawyer hat on, a member of the D.C. Bar,

and I'll tell you your story was fascinating. It doesn't have the elements of a smoking

gun, though. You know, you think about the things that you brought out there, Mark -

possible witness tampering, possible obstruction of justice, possible conspiracy to

commit bribery. But you need to know more information in terms of what was said in

those meetings, and whether or not the attorney, John Dowd, was getting his instructions

from his client, President Trump, in making those perhaps - dangling of those efforts.

We don't know that yet. And that's important to remember. But as far as what you

mentioned, Andrea, there's precedent for actually putting forward a presidential

pardon even before a criminal case takes place. 1992, Christmas Day, we had George

H.W. Bush issued six presidential pardons, one of them to Caspar Weinberger.

That presidential pardon came less than two weeks before his criminal trial was set to

start. It upset the independent counsel at the time, Lawrence Walsh, upset Democrats.

But the president did it, because he has the power to do it under the Constitution.

ANDREA MITCHELL: Of course, there had already been an indictment and a trial was scheduled.

ROBERT COSTA: That was at the end. So that's the historic context for pardons, and

the atmospherics matter, too, here in Washington right now because this all comes

as the attorney general is deciding not to move forward with a special counsel.

There's a clamor among many congressional Republicans to have a special counsel to look

into the conduct of the Department of Justice.

Why didn't the attorney general decide to move forward with a special counsel, instead

decided to move forward with an inspector general investigation?

SHAWNA THOMAS: I mean, I can't necessarily speak to what's going on in Attorney General

Sessions' head, but I can imagine that the PR of trying to do dueling special counsels -

how are they going to work together, who gets what - it's just - it just creates almost

more attention, more look at me, look at this, when I think they want to - I think

Attorney General Sessions wants to do his job in some ways, but he also wants to push

attention over to other things. I mean, he is running immigration stuff with DHS the

way people want it to be done, especially the way Republicans want it to be done.

He is one of the most successful Cabinet members there is, and I think he knows that

calling more attention to this, in some ways just more fire for

the Russia investigation, is a bad idea.

MARK MAZZETTI: And this - but it goes to this sort of strategy, right, for - the Republicans

have tried to use over the last year, which is in the - in the - with all this smoke

about Russia, the strategy is go after the investigation, right, examine the FBI, examine

the Justice Department, the Deep State - the so-called Deep State, discredit the

investigators as a way to discredit the investigation.

And so this has been the issue that's gone up with Comey, Andrew McCabe.

So this issue of what's going on in DOJ and FBI is something Trump talks about all the

time. Just on this clip about Flynn he was talking about it, and it's not going away.

ROBERT COSTA: Is it only going to ratchet up, Andrea?

If you think about former FBI Director James Comey has his book coming out in a few

weeks, A Higher Loyalty. The White House is on edge about that based on my reporting.

And you also have a combative president who on Twitter and elsewhere is becoming more

comfortable in office, turning to his loyalists more often.

And Dowd, Dowd's the part that is important also in the sense that he was the link to

Mueller - two former Marines talking on the phone occasionally. Now he's not

there, and it's the combative consultants and aides who are around the president.

ANDREA MITCHELL: It's the combative aides and former aides, because he's now been

reaching out to some of the former aides.

He doesn't have Hope Hicks as of this - end of this week she's gone.

So he's really alone and alone with his own feeling that he can be Trump.

I mean, he's the president of the United States, but he doesn't have any moderating

influence; less and less influence from John Kelly, that's clear, however long he stays.

He certainly doesn't have any restraining influence. He wasn't there when the

president was calling Putin. He hasn't been there for key decisions.

And here you had Trump trying to hire Joe diGenova and his wife, not vetting them, not

even having met them. I mean, there are all kinds of ways that we're seeing

the president acting out in this regard.

MARK MAZZETTI: And this issue of the legal team is really significant, right, and who is he

going to get to represent him during this very critical period, whether he has an

interview with Mueller or not. And what you're finding is this extraordinary situation

in Washington where the most sort of, you know, reputable, well-known lawyers and firms

are shying away from representing the president of the United States, which would be

like the pinnacle of someone's career. And some firms are hearing from clients worried

about the possible representation, what that might do. This is not normal.

ROBERT COSTA: And I talked to one attorney this week, big attorney, and I said - they

kept saying it's about conflicts, it's about political risk.

But you know why the say the real reason they don't want to join the Trump team?

Because the president, in their view as veteran lawyers, he wants to be his own lawyer,

and they don't think he really wants to accept the counsel's recommendations.

They look at the Dowd experience. So let's think about this point Andrea brought up

about the president losing Hope Hicks, some of his confidants, some of his associates.

There was another Cabinet shakeup, this time at the Department of Veterans Affairs.

President Trump dismissed David Shulkin on Wednesday and nominated Navy Rear Admiral

Ronny Jackson, the White House physician, to lead the VA. Dr. Shulkin was brought

in during the Obama administration, but his leadership was rattled by recent reports

that he used taxpayer money to take a European trip with his wife. Shulkin downplayed

the report, saying he has repaid the government for the charges. In a New York Times

op-ed he's fighting back, claiming he was the victim of politically based attacks.

He also told PBS NewsHour's Judy Woodruff, our colleague here, that he was fired, in his

view, because of his strong opposition to privatizing the VA, something President Trump supports.

FORMER VA SECRETARY DAVID SHULKIN: (From video.) I just don't see privatization as a

good thing for veterans. And I think that those that are really sticking to a political

ideology or doing this for other reasons, like financial reasons, don't have the interests

of veterans at heart. And I think you just have to talk to the veterans groups to hear that.

ROBERT COSTA: My colleagues at The Washington Post reported that many people inside of

the White House, including Dr. Jackson, were surprised by his nomination.

They wrote that Jackson was taken aback by the nomination and he hesitated to take on

such a big job. But the president continued to push, and told the senior staff on

Monday that the doctor was his top choice. A senior White House official says

Jackson went through a, quote, "informal interview process," but without the

extensive vetting that typically accompanies a Cabinet selection. That's a bit

risky in the view of some insiders, since Jackson must be confirmed by the Senate.

And we're looking at a tough confirmation, perhaps, for the - for the doctor.

SHAWNA THOMAS: We are, despite the fact that a lot of people in Washington, D.C.

on both sides like Ronny Jackson - Dr. Ronny Jackson, Admiral Ronny Jackson even -

because of his relationship with the Obama administration and he's - and his

relationship with the Trump administration. The problem here is - and we did sort

of a dive into the VA yesterday on VICE News Tonight - is that we couldn't find

any mention of something that looked like management for Dr. Jackson in terms of

running any kind of large organization or even small organization, really.

And so while he may be a very good doctor, it is hard to see how he is going to go into

something as large as the VA - something that, you know, David Shulkin had actually been

part of before, didn't really successfully get through his term as VA secretary - and do

anything. And he is going to face a lot of questions just about management, how

he's going to do this. And he's going to face the other question, which is about

privatization, which the clip about - that you showed with Mr. Shulkin touched on.

And that most people around town think it is that idea of privatizing the VA - something

that, you know, there are outside parties that definitely want that - that that was why

he was not going to survive there. I think the other thing you have to remember

is the VA is huge. It is - it has 351,000 full-time employees.

It is, I believe, the second-largest organization behind the Defense Department.

ROBERT COSTA: It is.

SHAWNA THOMAS: Lots and lots of hospitals, lots of outpatient sites. It is basically

a bank as well; it gives loans, it gives the GI Bill, and - sorry, not the GI Bill.

And it is unclear how Dr. Jackson is going to answer these questions.

JON DECKER: Seven out of the last individuals who have headed the VA - seven out of the

last nine have either resigned or been fired. I mean, that's - it gives you a

sense about the troubles that exist at this huge department.

SHAWNA THOMAS: Well, it's three VA secretaries in four years, right?

JON DECKER: Yeah, $200 billion budget, and as you mentioned there is no management

experience associated with the president's choice to lead the VA next.

And those tough questions on this are going to come from both Democrats and Republicans.

And you look at the veterans groups that are out there - AMVETS, which represents 250,000

veterans, has expressed concern over this particular choice of the president.

You have the VFW also expressing those same concerns. Between the time that he's

nominated and the time that the confirmation process takes place, it'll give time

for those organizations to get mobilized and convince those senators who sit on

the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee to vote against this nomination.

ANDREA MITCHELL: And he has perhaps 25 or 30, maximum, employees now in the physician's

office in the White House. So when you speak, Shawna, about no management

experience, there's really zero management experience for this kind of step up.

I think also, in fairness to Dr. Shulkin,

who had to explain after an inspector general's report his wife accompanying him on

a trip to Europe which he said had been pre-approved but still was questioned

afterwards, and that he paid back - in addition to working, there was a lot of

sightseeing - but that does not even come close to some of the questions that have been

raised about other Cabinet secretaries like Zinke and Pruitt in particular for

first-class travel to Morocco and potential conflicts of interest.

ROBERT COSTA: We only have half an hour on this show. I mean, there's so much

Cabinet unrest. It's not just with Shulkin and the VA, it's with Pruitt. We'll save

that for next week, but who knows what the news will be. We're going to have to

leave it there. And welcome, Jon, to Washington Week. It's great to have you here

on the program. And, of course, to our favorites who are back - Shawna, Andrea,

Mark - always a pleasure. And it's a pleasure to be with you. Thanks for watching.

This week on the Washington Week Extra, we'll discuss the controversy surrounding a

question about citizenship on this year's Census. Plus, President Trump's message

to the leader of North Korea ahead of their planned summit.

You can watch it online later tonight and all week long at PBS.org/WashingtonWeek.

I'm Robert Costa. And from all of us here, happy Passover and happy Easter.

For more infomation >> Inside the latest diplomatic showdown, staff shakeup at the Department of Veterans Affairs - Duration: 23:30.

-------------------------------------------

Trey Gowdy Smells A Dirty Rotten, Money Laundering Liberal Rat In Washington... - Duration: 3:26.

For more infomation >> Trey Gowdy Smells A Dirty Rotten, Money Laundering Liberal Rat In Washington... - Duration: 3:26.

-------------------------------------------

Citizenship question on the 2020 Census causes controversy - Duration: 12:38.

ROBERT COSTA: Hello. I'm Robert Costa. And this is the Washington Week Extra, where we

pick up online where we left off on the broadcast.

Joining me around the table, Shawna Thomas of VICE News, Mark Mazzetti of The New York

Times, Andrea Mitchell of NBC News, and Jon Decker of Fox News Radio.

California and New York are now suing President Trump over a new question on the

upcoming 2020 Census. Are you a citizen, it asks. And 12 other states may follow suit.

Critics argue this question has wide-ranging detrimental consequences.

When you think about this Census controversy, what does it reveal about the Trump

administration and its agenda with this particular project?

SHAWNA THOMAS: Well, number one, they're saying basically that in one version of the

Census, which is the American Community Survey, which they do every year but they do it

for a smaller amount of the population and then they use algorithms, basically, to widen

it out, they do ask a citizenship question, so what's the big deal, to a certain extent.

The problem with this is that, one, even though we've been talking about this citizenship

Census question for a little while, you know, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross insisted

that it be put in almost under the deadline for making questions for the Census.

Number two is even if it's for perfectly logical reasons - I think the Justice Department

has said it has to do with enforcing the Voting Rights Act - it doesn't matter because it

now looks political. When you are working with an administration that has approached

immigration the way it is, has approached trying to deport people the way it has, people

are going to look at this and they're going to tie it to that, and even if you try to

break those things apart it doesn't - it doesn't matter.

And so it is going to offend some people, and other people are going to defend it, and it

just gets thrown into this political thing that the Census isn't really supposed to be.

ANDREA MITCHELL: And it will - it will - it will depress participation, and that's a big

problem because we need the Census to be accurate not only for congressional districts

and the like; we need the Census to be accurate for the CDC, for communicable diseases,

for all kinds of health reasons. We need to know these facts. And if fewer people

participate or are afraid to participate, you're not going to have accurate data.

JON DECKER: But this is why California, New York, and other states - Massachusetts, Ohio

- say that they will join with lawsuits against the administration, just the political

aspect of it, and that is they fear that with an undercount in their particular states

they may lose seats in the - in the House of Representatives, which is a major concern to

California, which has large representation - the largest in the country - and New York

State as well. And so although the plan is for this particular question to be on the

Census in 2020, I don't know whether it will be because it's going to be tied up in the

courts for some time before the Census actually goes out to every citizen in this country.

ROBERT COSTA: Let's turn to foreign policy. Defense Secretary James Mattis welcomed

incoming National Security Adviser John Bolton at the Pentagon for their first meeting

on Thursday. We talked about that during the show and that exchange.

The two, though, will now need to work closely on a number of issues, which many - which

on some fronts the men do differ dramatically, including on the upcoming summit - the

proposed summit with North Korea. Mattis has said he's a firm believer in diplomacy.

Bolton has long been, of course, a hardliner who advocates for a preliminary strike and

regime change in North Korea. This week was interesting because China confirmed North

Korean leader Kim Jong-un traveled to Beijing to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

Some experts believe China is reasserting its dominance in the region ahead of these

talks between President Trump and Kim and five other countries in the region.

Andrea, what to make of all of this? We have, as we were talking about in the show,

a new dynamic on national security - Pompeo perhaps at State, Bolton in the

White House, the president - but there's also regional positioning going on in Asia.

ANDREA MITCHELL: Well, first of all, you've got China very nervous about this new North

and South Korea detente, if you will, the beginnings of movement, you know, a meeting

between them at the end of April already, and also nervous about the U.S. role.

And so they wanted to make sure that they welcomed Kim Jong-un to his first - what we

believe to be his first foreign trip, done in great secrecy, with a red-carpet welcome

and the full state visit treatment to show that they're in charge in their own

neighborhood. They very much want to also be coordinating and part of this conversation.

That said, the Bolton factor is going to be a major potential disruption.

And Pompeo is already, as CIA director, doing a lot of the advance work; we don't have a

secretary of state, and so he is filling that role.

And he's also been very hardline, even talked hypothetically about regime change in North

Korea back in - at the Aspen Security Conference last summer.

So there's a mismatch between the president's somewhat idealistic views of how he can

exert personal diplomacy through his personality on this young man - who has been

underestimated, I think, by American intelligence - and the realistic approach and

hardline approach, I think, by John Bolton and Pompeo, who are preparing the summit.

ROBERT COSTA: What was the message from the Chinese to Kim?

ANDREA MITCHELL: The message to Kim is that denuclearization is, you know, the important

fact that he has to stick to. But how does he define denuclearization? Is he talking

about the Americans withdrawing their nuclear umbrella from our allies there?

So these are the kinds of details. The real risk here is that the president agreed to

this spontaneously, surprising the South Koreans before he had even been briefed on the

details, and are his expectations too high? If it disappoints him - if both sides

leave disappointed, the only fallback option is military.

JON DECKER: I'm an optimist by nature. I'd love to see a diplomatic solution to

what has really troubled many administrations. But I'm also a realist.

And the fact of the matter is, is that Kim Jong-un, since this was announced several

weeks ago at the White House by South Korea's national security advisor, has not

announced to its own people - North Korea has not announced to its own people this

possibility of a meeting with President Trump, this possibility of denuclearizing, which

would be just against everything that country stands for. This is something that gives

them strength. It gives them power. It puts them on equal footing with other superpowers

around the world. And to give that up, I just don't see happening. I'm an optimist that a meeting

can happen. But I'm a realist. I don't think much is going to happen if that meeting happens.

ROBERT COSTA: It's interesting. You read about China and how they're pulling back

on some of their trade with North Korea, and that's maybe brought them to the table a

little bit - of course, there are other factors. But when you think about the conditions

that Bolton could set, anything come to mind? I mean, he's the long-time hardliner.

MARK MARK MAZZETTI: Right. And he's going to have the president's ear. And so it's

interesting he comes in at this moment right after Trump, as Andrea said, surprised

everyone with this. And now enter John Bolton who has, you know, decades of thinking

about this issue. And what is going to be the interplay between especially Bolton,

Mattis, and Pompeo? And who - kind of the war for the president's mind over this

issue. And in - you know, we're coming up to the moment.

And so I think, you know, we kind of know where John Bolton stands.

The question is whether he's going to sort of change his position at all.

ROBERT COSTA: Let's talk about the Russia probe, and stick with you, Mark, and your

reporting, because President Trump's former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, and his

deputy at that time, Rick Gates, they were in contact with a business associate known to

have ties to Russian military intelligence during the 2016 presidential campaign.

According to court documents filed this week by Special Prosecutor Bob Mueller, Gates has

admitted knowing that the associate was a former officer with Russian military

intelligence, the GRU. How significant is this story?

MARK MAZZETTI: Well, in a way, you know the headline that Trump campaign advisors had

contacts with Russian intelligence doesn't really shock anymore. I mean, we have now

multiple cases where this has happened. But it's significant for a few reasons.

First of all, you know, Manafort has long said that this former associate, Konstantin

Kilimnik, he didn't know whether he was a Russian intelligence officer or had any Russian

intel background. But Mueller's document comes out and says, in fact, that Gates

knew and told others that he had been with the GRU, and that they were doing this,

you know, weeks before the election, so September/October of 2016.

The other interesting thing that comes in the document is that Mueller says directly

this - these conversations are, quote, "relevant to the investigation." And the person

who he was charged and sentencing in that document had withheld that information.

So with Mueller you're always reading between the lines.

You have to look at the public statements, the documents.

But it is interesting that Kilimnik and the role in these conversations is brought out by

Mueller. And one other point, Manafort has long said that his case is a sideshow, right?

Whatever they were going after him and Gates for doesn't matter.

It doesn't affect the Russian collusion question, the question of Russian interference.

Well, this kind of brings the two a little bit together more than it's been in the past.

ROBERT COSTA: Manafort's going to trial.

MARK MAZZETTI: Right. He's going to trial.

ROBERT COSTA: He's fighting.

MARK MAZZETTI: Gates has cut a deal. Manafort's continuing to fight.

ROBERT COSTA: And we just keep hearing about Rick Gates. I mean, we were talking

during the show about John Dowd having conversations with Gates and Manafort.

Was it with Gates? Was it with Gates' attorney?

SHAWNA THOMAS: Manafort and Flynn. MARK MAZZETTI: Manafort and Flynn.

ROBERT COSTA: Manafort and Flynn. But Dowd never talked - did Dowd ever talk to Gates' attorney?

MARK MAZZETTI: Not that we know of.

ROBERT COSTA: OK. But is the White House, the administration - just based on your

conversations with sources - are they alarmed about Rick Gates and how he continues

to work with the Mueller investigation?

SHAWNA THOMAS: I mean, I think they're alarmed about everything that Mueller keeps

bringing out about Rick Gates. I mean, we talked about this filing this week.

There's no way to not be alarmed, basically because of what you said, because now we are

inching closer and closer to whatever Mueller is trying to do with Manafort and

everything that he's found about his businesses, clearly there may have been a deal to be

made somehow. Manafort's not making that deal. But something else is there.

And that's the thing, is every time there's a new filing, every time something hits our

inboxes and we're all like, whoa, what is happening, there's something else there.

MARK MAZZETTI: And Gates lasted on the campaign a lot longer than Manafort did.

SHAWNA THOMAS: Well, he was there at that time, unlike Manafort.

MARK MAZZETTI: And into the - and into the year - the first year in the White House as well.

ANDREA MITCHELL: And that Mueller filing was the most fascinating, because it was

explicit. It said: This is what we are looking at. And it was a big deal.

The other thing that there's been some reporting on this week is that they're - Mueller

is also looking at the way the platform at the Republican National Committee was changed,

was altered to favor the Ukrainian - Russian Ukrainian influences and to satisfy Manafort's client.

JON DECKER: And who was running the convention for the Trump campaign at the time?

It was Paul Manafort, right?

ROBERT COSTA: With Rick Gates at his side.

SHAWNA THOMAS: And he also had to leave right after that.

JON DECKER: That's right. SHAWNA THOMAS: Yeah.

JON DECKER: Well, with all of this, though, all of these stories that have come out - we

mentioned Rick Gates, and we mentioned Paul Manafort - but where does Donald J. Trump

fit into the picture? To what extent does he know about what they are doing, perhaps

behind closed doors and perhaps behind his back?

That's the real key here, because we already know that these two individuals are, you

know, in the - in the crosshairs of the special counsel's office.

That's why one of them has already cut a deal and the other one has said I'm not cutting

a deal, I'm going to go to trial - perhaps because he has the means to do so and perhaps,

getting back to our conversation earlier, he's banking on a presidential pardon.

ROBERT COSTA: That's a crucial point. So often when you talk to witnesses or

lawyers familiar with the case, it's about what was the extent of the candidate,

now president's, knowledge of Manafort and all of his activities and Rick Gates and

all of his activities? And then it comes down to intent when he was president, with

all of these different decisions he made. There's been potential obstruction of

justice alleged. Intent, and then knowledge. We're going to keep an eye on all of

it, but that's it for this edition of the Washington Week Extra.

While you're online, take our Washington Week-ly Quiz.

And read my take on President Jimmy Carter, who just published his 32nd book at age 93.

I hope we can all be that productive at age 93. I'm Robert Costa. Thanks for watching.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét