Thứ Sáu, 5 tháng 10, 2018

News on Youtube Oct 5 2018

Hey there, this is clay with www.ModernLove.Life and this is the relationship inner game experience

this week in the relationship inner game experience we're going to be talking about when a guy

never texts you first, but he always responds when you text him first.

Okay?

And this is mostly directed at women, but men experienced this too, but I just, through

my work I've noticed that really by far and large, mostly it's women that are asking about

this and wanting to know why the other person never text them first and, but will respond

if they text them.

Okay.

And I believe that is primarily because women are accustomed to letting the man take the

lead.

And so it's kind of disturbing for a lot of women when he's not taking the lead, but it

also does happen between men and women the other way around as well too.

So let's go ahead and get into this.

There's a couple of different things that could be happening when he's not texting you

first.

Okay?

Number one is, in all honesty, he might just not be interested in you.

You know, he's not seriously interested in dating you or something like that and you

know, he, he might actually be out there pursuing other women and he just kinda likes hearing

from you from time to time because it kind of boosts up his self esteem and he thinks,

yeah, I'm like really hot because, you know, there's this girl who keeps texting me and

it's boosting up his self esteem so we can go out there and approach other women and

go after other women and all of that stuff.

it's unfortunate, but it's true, you know, it's not outside the realm of possibility

that that could be the case.

The other thing that might be happening, thing number two is that he could just be a shy

person, right?

He could just be very shy.

He doesn't feel comfortable initiating things and taking the lead.

And I remember he even would want to do that, but he's, he's just kind of worried that he's

going to screw it up.

You know, he, he doesn't, he's not very certain that you like him and because he's not certain

he's, he's, he's putting off texting you, he's putting off texting because he's like,

well, you know, what do I do if she doesn't like me?

I have to think up the perfect text message.

I have to come up with the right thing to say.

I have to make sure I've got my plan figured out.

I have to make sure I've got the right date figured out after, make sure I know how to

talk to her.

So I come across as charming and charismatic and all that stuff.

So that could be happening.

He's just kind of procrastinating a little bit because he thinks he needs to prepare

more. and he might actually really like you.

That's another possibility.

Another thing is that he might just be on the passive side of things.

Now, I know that most men have this reputation of being, you know, aggressive.

They go after what they want.

If they want to, women, if they want to text them, if they want to go out on a date with

a woman, they will take the lead, they'll text or they'll call her, they'll say, hey,

are you free on Saturday night?

Let's go to this place or something like that.

However, that is not the case with every single man.

Some men are just passive either because they don't feel comfortable stepping into their

masculinity or maybe they just happened to be just more passive and that's just their

nature.

Right?

And if that is the case, then you have to accept that this is a passive guy.

You're probably not going to change him unless he wants to become more of an active, a proactive

kind of person.

So you're going to have to accept that that's the way he is.

I mean, he might be shy like we talked about a moment ago and once he really knows that

you like him, he'll take more of the lead.

But if he's just a shy person, if he's just a passive person rather than, you're going

to have to be okay with that.

And say, okay, I am okay with this being a passive person and I'm okay to initiate more

than he does.

Or you have to say no, I want somebody who's gonna initiate.

I want somebody who I'm not going to have to do most of the work to get the ball rolling.

And so say, Hey, you know, you're a nice person, but I really want somebody more proactive.

So Hasta la vista, baby or something like that.

Okay. another possibility that might be going on is that he could just be really busy.

He could just have a lot of stress going on in his life when there's a whole lot of things

going on in a guy's life.

Maybe some kind of deadline with work or school or, or some sort of crazy stress in his life.

Family drama.

I don't know.

A lot of his emotional bandwidth could just be taken up by that.

And so he doesn't feel that he can be 100 percent present with you.

So he doesn't want to start that conversation with you.

It doesn't want to start things down that road because he knows he's not going to be

able to be there for the full conversation.

He's knows he's not going to be able to actually follow through and be 100 percent present

and actually be able to organize the date and ask you out and all that stuff.

So he's not initiating things with you right now.

Or perhaps his focus is just on whatever the stressful thing is, the work deadline, the

family drama that, whatever it might be.

And so he just isn't able to focus on you.

Okay.

He might like you a lot.

It's just he could be just really stressed and busy.

Okay.

And again, like what I said before, we do have to accept him 100 percent the way that

he is assuming this is a longterm problem, you know, he has a stressful job or something

like that and say, okay, this is a stressful guy, guy who's always busy.

I either have to accept him the way he is or I have to say, you know, I'm really looking

for somebody who's not as stressed out all the time.

You're a nice person, but you just aren't the right person for me.

Thanks.

Bye.

I'm going to go find someone else, but you can't try and change him.

Okay.

Unless this is just not the status quo.

This is just like, Hey, I'm just a regular guy, but right now in this particular point

in time I'm really stressed and after a certain deadline, which I can tell you on the calendar,

this certain date when the thing is due, when the thing resolves or whatever, I will not

as stressed out, you know?

If that's the case, then yeah, cut him a little bit of slack and see how he behaves after

that deadline.

Okay.

Overall though, I would be really careful about paying too much attention to a guy not

initiating texts with you.

Okay.

Because at the end of the day, that's kind of keeping score and keeping score is not

really going to set you up for a great long term relationship.

I think we already know that in a certain degree, we've talked about this in previous

relationship inner game experience episodes, so I'm not going to beat that to death.

You can go back and listen to that one.

I'll probably link to it down below in the description for this relationship inner game

experience if you're watching this over on our website, but really just focus on making

sure that the two of you are having a high quality emotional connection.

If you're having a high quality emotional connection that it really doesn't matter who's

initiating contact.

It really doesn't matter if it's him, if it's you, if it's whatever.

I mean, you know, I'm, I'm married, I've got a wife.

And I honestly couldn't tell you who initiates contact more, her or me because I don't keep

score of that.

I'm sure if you were to somehow, you know, go and look through our text history or something,

you'd be able to say, oh, well, clay initiates more or, or Mika initiates more.

But, it's just not something that either one of us really pays attention to because we

focus more on the quality of the connection between us rather than who's initiating contact.

And if you find yourself focusing on who's initiating contact more, and you're really

focusing on that and worrying about that, then it probably means that the emotional

connection isn't that strong and would focus on that first and foremost.

Okay.

So with that being said, let's go ahead and get to our Q and A for this week.

Again, this is from members of the Modern Love Association.

They can go ahead and submit questions on a weekly basis and we go ahead and answer

five of them each week.

So let's go ahead and see what questions have been submitted this week.

The first question is from LV, LV writes in and says, hi clay.

My question concerns the progress from phase to phase.

It seems like my ex and I keep riding the dragon.

Well we have a great time when we meet up and we are connecting and bonding emotionally.

But then she pulls back afterwards and I then give her space to re-initiate things after

awhile.

Then we meet up again, all those well, and then we are back in the same cycle again.

So my question is, how can I break the cycle of the emotional pull back to make better

progress within writing the dragon and reach phase four?

Okay, so the important thing when it comes to things like this where you end up getting

stuck in a cycle over and over and over again, is that it's often because you are using the

same strategy over and over and over again.

And I noticed that you said that you constantly use the no contact thing and basically pulling

back as well and giving her space and wedding her reach out to you.

Okay?

So as long as you continuously have the same approach such as giving her space, which is

doing no contact or something like that, you're going to continue to have a hard time.

You're going to continue to get the same results.

and this is something that I've seen over and over and over again, is that people will

think that they only have one tool available to them.

And typically that's no contact.

You know, whenever something goes weird with your ex, you do no contact whenever you have

a hard time getting through your ex.

You Do, you know, contact whenever there is a poor experience, you do no contact whenever

your ex has emotional pull back.

You do no contact, right?

And sure there are times and places for cutting contact with your ex.

But if no contact is your only tool, then you're going to have a very, very, very hard

time.

That's why we give you a whole array of tools through the advanced relational skills.

We give you an array of tools that allow you to feel into what your ex is experiencing,

to ask them questions like, Hey, was there something that happened that's causing you

to be silent right now?

Or, or, or, I thought that we had a really good time, on this, on this date that we went

on on this.

maybe you don't call it a date, but on this meetup that we had, was I wrong?

Did you experience that differently or something like that.

And so as long as you continue to use the advanced relational skills and you don't just

rely on a single strategy like no contact, then you'll be able to get past this roadblock.

Okay.

So, LV, I hope this helps you out and please keep us updated on how things go moving forward

from here.

Okay.

Our next question is from Claire.

Claire says, Hi Clay.

My ex told me three weeks ago that she is completely over me and doesn't see us ever

getting back together.

She said that she wants to be friends.

Her outlook on relationships appeared to have changed a lot since the breakup.

She said she doesn't believe in soul mates anymore and doesn't want to date anyone.

Seriously.

I've been working on moving on and she's started dating someone else, which despite what said,

seems to be on track to something serious.

I don't think that it's a rebound because we broke up like three months ago and she

said that she's completely over me.

While I'm not thrilled about it, I know that I can't do anything about it.

Just so you know, time has nothing to do with determining whether something is a rebound

relationship or not.

And your ex saying that they are completely over you has nothing to do with them actually

being completely over with you.

They might still be very much caught up in you, but anyway you continue.

I've taken up new activities and have been focusing on my other friendships.

She's still friendly with me and she still cares about me.

She asks me for help on Homework, asks me how I'm doing and invites me to hang out with

other people there.

When we hang out, we laugh and tease each other and it just feels very natural.

After I leave, she usually texts me later to ask about something or invite me somewhere.

Later on she said she doesn't want a relationship but is dating this other girl.

I'm confused by these mixed messages.

I'm not gonna sit around waiting for her.

However, is staying friends with her, having emotional connections with her.

Is that okay if I want to remain open to the possibility of getting back together in the

future or should I make some kind of move so that she knows that I still have feelings

for her so that I am not cemented as a friend.

I just don't know how to keep moving forward or getting back together, which you seem so

comfortable being just friends.

You need to understand it is that your ex will never see you as completely a platonic

friend.

The two of you have a romantic history and in order to see you as a platonic friend,

she has to overlook the fact that the two of you had a relationship together.

She has to be able to look you in the face, look you in the eye and not experience that,

not experience the love that she felt for you, not experienced the attraction that she

felt with you.

Not experienced the intimate moments where the two of you were kissing, where the two

of you are making love to be able to look at you and not experience any of that and

that is not possible.

Okay.

That is just not possible for people to do that.

Whenever you have a romantic relationship with somebody, you will always look at that

person through a romantic lens.

The attraction may, however, be blocked by bad feelings, baggage history, and all of

that stuff.

That is not something that you need to deal with by re attracting.

Another person would need to do is instead work on flushing out those negative feelings.

Okay?

When we say that you don't need to worry about the friend zone, I'm not saying that you need

to act like a friend.

I'm not saying that you need to act platonically.

Of course you can flirt with your ex.

Of course you can do things that you would do with an attractive person.

You know why?

Why wouldn't you flirt with them?

Why wouldn't you just work that into your relate reward cycles?

Why wouldn't you just toss that in there?

Like what we talk about inside the course, but what I want to make sure that you also

do is that you focus on having high quality interactions that feel good on an emotional

level to see so that you're basically building up that relational equity, that emotional

equity between the two of you so that you are number one, clearing out the negative

emotions in history between the two of you and number two, continuing with the flirtatious

activity so that you are not taking it to a platonic level.

Of course you can say that you're just being friends with your ex.

Doesn't feel the pressure to define what the two of you are and so that you have this space

to actually build up that connection.

That's absolutely fine.

I wouldn't worry about your ex dating someone else.

I wouldn't worry about your ex.

You know, saying that they're not ready for a relationship and then you know, saying that

they just want to casually date someone.

Going out on dates with that personnel and see if there's any mixed message in there.

Your ex says that they don't want something serious and they're casually dating somebody

that I'm not seeing a mixed message in there myself.

so I would just focus on the quality of the connection between the two of you.

Make sure that it has that romantic vibe without necessarily saying this is a romantic interaction

or anything like that.

And I think that's going to help you out a lot.

Okay.

So, Claire, please keep us updated and have things go and a hope that helped you out.

Our next question is from K a K says hello clay.

I started the program about two months ago after struggling for a year and have seen

a lot of progress between now and then.

I practiced the advanced relational skills everyday and have been feeling like a switch

between, like I switched between stages three and four.

I'm guessing she means between the crossroads and the bridge.

My ex and I have been spending nearly everyday together for about a month and have felt like

we are together, but obviously happier and healthier than our old relationship.

However, I asked him on a date for his birthday morning, of which he resisted for the reason

that he did not want to imply that we're getting back together and did not want to take advantage.

I assured him that it would be fun and worth it and he agreed.

By late afternoon, we had fought on a couple of his birthday's in the past, so I understood

his hesitation and worry.

I explained how well that we've been getting along and that I wanted to be with him and

that he said that he was surprised that he agreed to spend it at all with me and his

reasoning was because he didn't want to be alone.

He also said, quote, you need to realize my ultimate goal is not to get back together.

I'm just doing whatever because I don't really have a direction anymore.

If something sticks, it sticks, but I'm not moving towards anything right now and to quote,

didn't want mostly.

Well, there was some awkwardness because of our anxieties, not wanting to relive the past.

He is not and has not been in a rebound relationship.

Just been on some dates and seen some people casually over the past six months, but I am

now hitting a wall with his response if I ask him about it or trying to get him to open

up.

He gets angry and agitated and shuts down.

He's been difficult to get answers about us or what he wants.

I have been empathetic and patient since I started these skills.

How do I continue our progress and breakthrough this last bit of reactants without upsetting

him or moving backwards.

Okay.

So his response, which was that he doesn't have anything that he's moving towards right

now.

It really implies that he is not at a place where he's ready to commit to a relationship

where he's ready to get anything solid down in there.

Okay.

And it sounds like you were maybe trying to go for like the commitment collaboration conversation

or something like that in that moment, which would imply that you thought that he was at

new beginnings and clearly he's not a new beginnings.

I think right now he is probably at like a riding the dragon kind of place.

Okay.

Now he may not seem particularly hot and cold, particularly extreme like you might expect

at writing the dragon because he, I'm getting this vibe from him that he's a pretty mellow,

relaxed, chill kind of person.

And so his riding the dragon might not be very extreme, but he is doing things like

saying, oh no, I don't really want to get together or I have some hesitation about getting

together with you and then, you know, getting together with you anyway.

So I think that that might be where he's at.

So what you need to do is focus on continually building the quality connections that you're

having.

Okay.

If you can continue to build those, then I think you'll build up some more relational

equity.

It will base, you know, every time you have like a positive interaction with them, you're

basically like depositing something into like a bank account, but it's not money in a bank

account.

It's like a, it's like a deposit into a relational equity account that you have between you and

him.

And the more that you deposit, the more your savings grow over time.

And the higher that becomes the, the higher the equity that you have in that relational

account becomes the stronger the relationship that you have with him is going to become.

Okay.

So I don't think that you're maybe as far along as I think that you thought that you

were.

So I would continue to build that up.

Okay.

I think that he's probably at writing the dragon.

Okay.

And so just continue to have high quality interactions with him, continued to flirt

with them a little bit, continue to create those emotional connections.

And I think that you'll eventually get to a point where you can have that kind of interaction

with him.

Okay.

Right now he says he doesn't have a direction right now.

He says he doesn't know where he's going.

He doesn't know what he wants.

And that's fine.

That's pretty typical of riding the dragon area anyway.

So don't be so caught up on what he says because what he says is based off of where he's at

emotionally, which is, I don't know what I want and what he wants will start to change

once something starts to feel really good.

Okay, once something starts to feel really good, he'll start to move towards that.

That's why you need to focus on having really good quality emotional connections.

Okay.

Kay, I hope that helps you out and please keep us updated on how things go moving forward.

From here, our next question is from Aa.

Aa says, hi clay.

My ex and I have had multiple breakups during four years.

Therefore it was hard for me to know if it was real this time, but we've been apart for

a bit over a year now.

Currently a long distance relationship.

We've been in touch since September of last year, but this year we made a lot of progress.

We talked almost daily since April with ups and downs.

He expressed feelings for me.

We forwarded and had video sex often even though he has been discouraging me a lot in

between.

We've still kept in touch regularly and talked for hours.

I thought that we were in phase four, which I'm guessing she means the crisis point.

When he sent me a gift in August saying that he kind of loved me and that I said that I

was in love with him, well flirting.

He asked me to meet up two weeks later, he told me that he wasn't ready to meet for a

relationship and we had to cut contact because he is not well and going on a different path,

although later he said that he didn't want to cut contact but doesn't want to flirt anymore

because it's something one should do in person.

He suffers from depression and anxiety and therefore has some mood swings.

He's started to get better and two weeks ago he moved to another country for his career.

The week before he had thought about what we could have done differently in our relationship.

After his move, he's been a bit distant and closed up.

We had some good interactions though and I think I reached out too much, so I've turned

it down a notch.

We had a good talk this Saturday and they asked me to talk more the next day.

The following day he seemed annoyed and we didn't have a positive interaction.

He called me later and apologized and we managed to have a quite rewarding interaction after

all, sharing more personal things again, he said that he's stressed and has low capacity

to talk to anyone, not just me.

It's hard for me not to get affected by his words when he is so low.

I don't know whether or not it's actually writing the dragon or how he really is.

How can I keep us getting closer emotionally and moving forward.

Okay.

So I would probably guess that it is riding the dragon just because he is going through

a lot of changes in his life.

He's moving to another country which probably involves a lot of logistical things such as

wrapping up all the loose ends in whatever country he lived in before.

A dealing with all of his belongings, packing up some of them, selling others, getting rid

of the rest, and then of course moving to another country, getting setup.

They're handling all the logistical things, finding a place to live, a unpacking, going

out and buying things that he needs for the new place and all that stuff.

Not to mention the work.

And all that stuff, and it on top of that, he has anxiety and depression, you know, there's

a lot for him to deal with right there.

So given all of those shifts in his life, I would not be surprised if he is at writing

a dragon and I wouldn't be surprised if he is kind of putting the brakes on a lot of

his personal relationships, not just with you but with other people, um, as he goes

through this transition and as he goes through this transition towards getting his own footing

in his new life.

So what I would do on when it comes to the emotional connection is, you know, sure, be

as connected with him as you can to the degree that it feels good on an emotional level,

um, as it seems like you are, but also cut him a little bit of slack, right?

Let him come to you sometimes.

Let him get his own bearings and find the space and time to come to you when it makes

sense for him.

Okay. remember that your agenda is not necessarily his agenda and the timeline that you want

to get back together on, which is probably like yesterday or as soon as possible, is

probably not the timeline that's going to feel the most emotionally rewarding for him.

Okay.

Remember, he just is stepping into a new life.

He is adapting to a lot of new things right now.

He's going through career changes, country changes, living changes, changes in probably

his, his entire environment.

Even.

So let him adapt.

Let him focus on that as, as possible and you know, connect with him on this stuff.

Ask Him, you know, what, what's interesting in the new place that he's living in, like

if he could live anywhere where he'd want to live, what the two of you would do if you

were together there, that, that weekend or whatever, just go ahead and start to be curious

about his experience and let him tell you more about what's going on with him on his

own terms.

Okay?

So I hope that helps you out.

Aa and please keep us updated on how things go moving forward.

From here, our next question is from Linea.

Linea says, Hi Clay.

Thank you for answering my question.

In episode number 27, I'm having mixed feelings about my ex being at riding a dragon.

It's my fault because I haven't been consistently practicing the advanced relational skills.

He called me for the first time about two weeks ago because he hurt his hand at work

and couldn't text.

Last week he sent me a good morning text.

Whenever I go out with somebody, he always asks who I went with.

I want to believe that these are signs that he still likes me, but just yesterday he asked

me to come pick up my book at his house and I couldn't because I didn't have enough money

to call an uber there.

He didn't respond.

I realized that I'm still in damage control mode and don't want to lose him because of

it.

I was wondering if I should do limited, no contact to practice advanced relational skills.

I might even need to see a professional, but I don't have the funds to do that yet.

I've been attached to outcome and I know that that's not good and if I want him back, I

cried.

The thought of losing him for good and I realized that maybe I'm still needy.

Even if we were to get back together, he'd break up with me again.

How do I change without worrying about losing him in the process?

What if it takes a while?

Okay, so it.

It definitely sounds like you.

There is some damage control mode stuff going on there and the important thing here is that

you get serious about improving the quality of the interactions that you have, that you

get serious about shutting off the BS machine in your mind.

Okay?

Because these are not helping you.

These are not helping you at all.

And so if in the past you did sort of a halfhearted ANC or something like that, if you've halfheartedly

practice the advanced relational skills, now is the time to do it.

I don't know if it means you should do limited contact, no contact, whatever, but you know,

the only reason you would do no contact is if you wanted number one and easy stakes situation

or context to work on the advanced relational skills.

And number two, if interacting with your ex felt bad on an emotional level and was driving

the two of you apart.

So if that's happening, then you need to contact your ex even less or even, you know, cut contact

entirely until you can interact with your ex and have it feel good on an emotional level.

And of course, practice the advanced relational skills everyday on a daily basis are you don't

need to do each one every day, but you know, depending on what the skill is, if it's something

more more big and dramatic than do that one once in a while, but if it's something small,

like striking up a conversation with somebody and, and, and taking an impact that a point

of view towards their world and then go ahead and do that one every day.

There's no reason not to do that when every day.

but just go ahead and practice the advanced relational skills, do the exercises that we

lay out in the course and that's a great place to start practicing them.

Um, if there's any that you are having difficulty with, you know, by all means, go ahead and

reach out to us and contact us and maybe ask a question next week or something like that.

But overall what you need to do is you need to get serious about improving the quality

of the connection that you are having, the impact that you are having on the interactions

with him and take full responsibility for your role in those interactions.

Take full responsibility for your role in how you're bringing yourself to those interactions.

And as that happens, you can start to change the dynamic that's happening there.

Okay?

You'll be able to start getting out of damage control mode as you start to work on the advanced

relational skills as you start to shut off the pas machine and you'll be able to actually

start to have interaction to feel better on an emotional level.

Okay?

You won't start to panic every time.

Something that happens, like he says, Hey, I want to give you this book back and you

think that it means that the two of you are never going to talk again and that he's moving

on completely, or something like that because that is kind of a stretch.

The way that you describe it to me, it seems like a stretch and I would not jump to that

conclusion if I were you.

So Linea when it comes to holidays, you gotta put in the work.

You gotta put in the effort.

You got to take time to work on the fundamentals.

Okay?

There's no silver bullet.

It's going to do the work for you that's going to help you skip past the fundamentals and

the hard work needed in order to actually create high quality interactions.

You just gonna have to put in the work.

Take the time to learn the advanced relational skills.

Take the time to get good at them.

Take time to turn down the volume on your bs machine and that's when you'll start to

see some real progress.

Okay, so I hope this helps you out and please keep us updated on how things go moving forward

from here.

Okay, and those have been our questions for this week.

Once again, thank you so much for submitting those questions.

Everybody in the MLA, once again, this has been clay with www.ModernLove.Life.

If you have liked this episode of the relationship inner game experience, please go ahead and

like this on youtube, subscribe on Youtube, leave a comment down below or subscribe on

itunes or leave a review on itunes or head on over to www.ModernLove.Life and feel free

to support us by signing up for a course that makes sense for what kind of outcome you want

over there and you're dating or relationship life.

Anyway, this has been Clay and I'll go ahead and talk to you next week.

Take care.

For more infomation >> He never texts me first! Are you keeping score in your relationship? RIG [29] - Duration: 30:41.

-------------------------------------------

Reach - Choosing my friends and relationships - Duration: 5:12.

At paradigm we're passionate about the rights of all to live good ordinary lives.

The Reach standard in support for living are designed to ensure everyone

is supported to choose where they live, who they live with, how they live and who

supports them. Reach has nine standards. We've worked with people across the

country to make a film for each Reach standard. So whether you are a self

advocate, family member, supporter, manager, commissioner, inspector -

please use these films in any way that works for you. So, here are two short

clips on focusing on the standard - I choose my friends and my relationships.

Take one.

Hi Zac. Are you ready for your planning meeting?

So today, we're planning what you are going to do next month.

So what would you like to do next month?

Gay Pride.

Alright, what is Gay Pride? I've never heard of it. It's a carnival.

It's a carnival? Alright. Shall I look it up?

Alright, so I didn't find a carnival but I found that Pride Parade is a

celebration of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender plus people. Is that what you

meant? Yeah alright. But it's on a Saturday

and on Saturday you normally go to the lunch club don't you? You've got lots of

friends at the lunch club haven't you? So Jo would miss you and Glenn would

miss you. They would all miss you wouldn't they?

They expect you don't they? And then afterwards you're going to football aren't you?

You already know lots of people, you already have lots of friends at the lunch club so

you're busy on that Saturday aren't you?

Take two

Alright Zac so, what do you want to do next month?

Gay Pride.

You want to go to Gay Pride? Yes.

Where did you hear about Gay Pride? Somebody tell you about it or did you

watch it on TV? A friend. A friend told you about it?

Which friend told you about it? Phil. All right so Phil told you about it. Yeah.

Let's have a look what the internet says. They have some photographs with lots of really funky

dressed people, very colorful. There you go. So, do you know what you would want to wear

when you go to Gay Pride? A funky dress.

A funky dress. That sounds good, do you have a funky dress or do you need to buy a funky dress?

Buy one.

Buy one. Okay should we arrange a shopping trip then?

Yes

Okay, when do you want to go shopping?

Weekend.

At the weekend. Do you want to go this weekend because we got a bit

of time haven't we? It's in July so we have

got a few weeks time. All right, so let's go this weekend.

Well I'm working this weekend so I'm on shift with you so we can do it this Saturday.

Is that okay? Yeah, all right and who would you want to go with?

Phil

You want to go with Phil. All right. That's nice, all right.

With staff.

You want to go with Phil and staff. All right. Have you asked Phil if he wants to come?

He already knows

He does already know, you told him about it and is he happy to

come with you?

He said yes.

Okay, fantastic let's go shopping Saturday, see

what we get for you to wear and then we can have a look how we get there and

arrange the day.

To get a train. We can get a train, I'm sure we can get there by train.

Thanks to all involved at three C's.

For more infomation >> Reach - Choosing my friends and relationships - Duration: 5:12.

-------------------------------------------

7 Tips to end a relationship on good terms - Duration: 2:43.

For more infomation >> 7 Tips to end a relationship on good terms - Duration: 2:43.

-------------------------------------------

Vindi Wale Superb Funny threesome Relationship - Duration: 3:43.

see this vindi wale dating other girl after leave me alone

you say that you goes to class.this is your class

why you not say me about this directly?

listen..see is my girlfriend okk

so mind it and

do not make Noice here.this is a park many people see here

understand it.and get out

you listen he is my boyfriend..really really he is your boyfriend.listen vindi wala i kill you

why you do this thing with me

you kill me.....yessss

Vindi wala bastard .why you breakup with me

i thinking that you go to class and study

but here another study going on

ok ok relax relax

i punish you alot.relax! what for relax

hello leave please i do not know this happen

listen problem is that

oh my god! what i done.why i love you.i finish my carrier all things

see there rinki is much happy with there boyfriend

i am also come here to be happy with rinki's boyfriend

but you seen me another relationship

now what i can do

laugh..speak them forget it.

what happen sister?

see see this Baste.what he do here

he comes daily here

and he say me lie i am goes to study in Class

this is his extra class

sister wait i am calling my BF to beat him

hello

where are you

hey vindi wala what you doing..oh please beat him quickly friend.

yes yes he is coming..come quick

my friends BF sit here with another girl

you both confused me

i also not understand what i do here

beby i am coming..

broke the traffic and come fast with hocky stick

listen come with many boys with any toys

today fight occur definitly

hey hey listen where you are going in this problem

why are you going in this problem

come with me they continue there fight

put my hand

put my hand quick..get loss

oh my gold you are my life beby

listen i do not know anything.come with me

do breakup with this girl now

do breakup now

i tell you i call army

because police not listen

sad* why you breakup with me why?

tell me why?

hey police station

if you enjoy this video and for more video you must subscribe this cannel

ok sir

okk sir

please sir subscribe and press the bell icon

Thank you sir

For more infomation >> Vindi Wale Superb Funny threesome Relationship - Duration: 3:43.

-------------------------------------------

1:1 pool game leads to talk about their relationship status | I've fallen for you ep.10-1 - Duration: 6:09.

Hwang In Tak: Teach me. I've never played before

Park Min Jae: I'm not an expert at it either

[aegyo]

Hwang In Tak: It's okay

Everyone starts out that way

Awkward posture>>

<<Balls don't go in

(It's harder than I thought...)

This is his first time

Hwang In Tak: I'm doing well, right?

Park Min Jae: You're doing just fine

I'm not that good either

Sewoon: Her expression and vibe changed

<<Effortlessly scores

<<Another one

Third win>>

Hwang In Tak: You said you weren't good

She's so good

Hwang In Tak: You said you weren't good

Park Min Jae: Should I help you?

Hwang Min Tak: Yes

Park Min Jae: Ok

Stand with your feet apart

Look closer at the ball

Make your fingers into a circle

And lower the cue

<<First ball

Hwang In Tak: It finally went in

Park Min Jae: Yay~ It went in

Hwang In Tak: Should we get something to drink?

Park Min Jae: Ok

Was playing pool fun?

Hwang In Tak: It was fun...

Park Min Jae: Did you get mad?

Hwang In Tak: No, no~

Park Min Jae: I'm glad you had fun

Hwang In Tak: My face is getting warm

Park Min Jae: Cool off with a drink

Hwang In Tak: We met in our first year of middle school

Park Min Jae: But last year

When we used to talk often

I wondered why we suddenly lost touch

I remember

You once confessed your feelings for me

But we were both busy at the time

So I rejected

Was it due to that?

Hwang In Tak: That's part of it

But I did get ahead of myself

Park Min Jae: Not at all

I didn't really explain myself either

And just led you on without much thought

I also regretted the rejection

I wanted to keep in touch

But you were probably busy and wouldn't like it, so I didn't

Hwang In Tak: But somehow we're here

Park Min Jae: Did you date anyone after we stopped talking?

Hwang In Tak: I don't have anyone

You talk like an old soul

Park Min Jae: After we stopped talking

There was no one I liked before or after

Hwang In Tak: Can I call you often?

Park Min Jae: Pinky promise

I wanted to get you something

Hwang In Tak: A present?

Park Min Jae: I didn't know what to get you

I remembered you liked Justin Bieber

That was something you said a year ago

So I wondered if you were still a fan

I still like Justin Bieber

I listen to all of his albums

Park Min Jae: Because I can't bring Justin Bieber himself

It's a gift

Hwang In Tak: You bought it?

Park Min Jae: I bought it

[Justin Bieber CD]

I know you like Justin Bieber...

I like you too

That's a realistic smile

Hwang In Tak: It sounded like a rhyme

Park Min Jae: I knew you'd like it

It's hot in here

Hwang In Tak: It's getting hot in here

#I'veFallenforYou #IsItReal?

For more infomation >> 1:1 pool game leads to talk about their relationship status | I've fallen for you ep.10-1 - Duration: 6:09.

-------------------------------------------

Royal expert revealed: Sarah Ferguson is Trying to improved relationship with Royal Family - Duration: 4:43.

For more infomation >> Royal expert revealed: Sarah Ferguson is Trying to improved relationship with Royal Family - Duration: 4:43.

-------------------------------------------

'Relationship gone south,' Investigators look into why a college student would hire a hit-man - Duration: 1:33.

For more infomation >> 'Relationship gone south,' Investigators look into why a college student would hire a hit-man - Duration: 1:33.

-------------------------------------------

10 Things You Should Never Do in Your Marriage/Relationship (2018) - Duration: 3:31.

hello guys thank you for dropping by on my youtube channel it's the first time

you're coming here I'm Kadrian Thomas and on this channel every day I share one

video of tips of how you can enrich and enhance your relationship guys today I

want to talk to you specifically about 10 things you should never do in your

relationship or in your marriage number one never compare your wife to another

woman past nor present because when you do that you're actually saying she is

not good enough number two never classify your wife nor call her by

derogative terms that's the worst thing you can ever do to a woman number three

never make threats nor give ultimatums that you're about to leave or you're

going to leave if they don't change X or do X because remember guys they have a

choice to leave too and the time they may choose to leave they may not tell

you and it may take you as a surprise number 4 never borrow money from your

in-laws or your siblings without first discussing it with your partner with

your wife because when you do so and then she finds out or you tell her in

her eyes she may feel insecure about you not being able to provide for her as her

husband number 5 never let your parents control your

relationship guys not everything that happens in your hopes you need to take

up your phone and call your mama or call your dada and saying your wife is

doing this or your wife is not doing that listen by the time you want to take

their hands off the lever it may be too late and they may be in total control of

your relationship making every single decision for you

number six never hide an illness from your wife because if you do it may cost

you your life but if you do tell her about it it may be the saving of your

life even if it is your fault number seven never hide money from your

wife guys if you hide money then again if she does find out

you may be giving her the impression that you have another woman even when you

don't have another woman number eight if you have another baby mama let your wife

know if you messed up and you have another baby mama let your wife know

because the day it comes out it may be on your worst day number nine never

abuse your spouse physically verbally nor emotionally because it doesn't only

destroy her love bank for you it annihilates her and it leaves mental

scars for life number ten never lie nor cheat on your

wife guys if you lie or cheat you may lose her trust and that is something you

may spend the rest of your life trying to recover trying to regain its the

hardest thing for you to get back Trust takes time to build but when it's broken

it's hard to be repaired so those are my 10 tips for you today if you like the

videos I'm creating participate in the community and leave a

comment below what is one thing that you should never do as a husband in your

relationship and if you have not yet subscribed to my youtube channel just

remember that every single day I share one video of tips of how you can enrich

and enhance your relationship for now I'm Kadrian Peace out!

For more infomation >> 10 Things You Should Never Do in Your Marriage/Relationship (2018) - Duration: 3:31.

-------------------------------------------

Patriots' Tom Brady Focused on Relationship With Josh Gordon | Heavy.com - Duration: 2:46.

Patriots' Tom Brady Focused on Relationship With Josh Gordon | Heavy.com

With New England Patriots wide receiver Josh Gordon debuting for his new team last week, there was plenty of excitement surrounding Tom Brady's newest weapon.

And it seems even Brady is well aware of what Gordon can bring to the table, or at the very least is interested in building a relationship with his new teammate.

As ESPN's Jeff Darlington revealed on NFL Sunday Countdown ahead of Week 4, Brady has "taken it upon himself" to get close to Gordon.

"Tom Brady has taken it upon himself to ingratiate himself to [Josh] Gordon and really get to know him.

Their lockers are right next to each other in the locker room and Brady has reached out often times to Gordon to make sure they're on the same page." Darlington stated.

Josh Gordon's Upside, Struggles of Patriots Wide Receivers.

The Patriots offense has struggled to get things going in recent weeks, and Brady's new relationship with Gordon could help in a big way.

If the two are on the same page, it could go a long way toward fixing issues that plagued the team in the first three weeks.

Over the two-game stretch prior to Gordon's arrival, New England averaged just 15 points per game, including a 10-point showing on Sunday Night Football against the Detroit Lions in Week 3.

 During the recent stretch, no wideout has tallied more than 44 receiving yards and in the loss to Detroit, only two receivers even caught passes (Chris Hogan and Cordarrelle Patterson).

If Gordon and Brady are clicking early, it'll be scary for opposing defenses, and we should find out quickly moving forward whether the duo is on the same page or not.

Regardless, the longterm outlook between the quarterback-wide receiver will only benefit names like Rob Gronkowski, Julian Edelman when he returns and the rest of the team's offensive weapons.

For more infomation >> Patriots' Tom Brady Focused on Relationship With Josh Gordon | Heavy.com - Duration: 2:46.

-------------------------------------------

Abortion: What Is the Relationship of Church and State? - Duration: 32:26.

This evening I would like to direct our attention to one of the most critical issues that is

involved in this debate about abortion and that's the issue of the relationship of the

church to state government.

I think I'd like to begin by reminding you that America did not begin at the First Continental

Congress.

American history books do not begin with the writing of the Constitution or of the Declaration

of Independence.

But we know that very early in the seventeenth century settlers came to the shores of America

as colonists principally to escape severe religious persecution.

We know that the first governing document in American history was one that was intensely

religious and theological.

I'm thinking of course of the Mayflower Compact.

But I'd like us to just go back in time a little bit for a moment or two and remember

what it was that provoked these multitudes of people to leave their possessions, to leave

their native lands, and come to this country.

They came as I said to escape religious persecutions, but those religious persecutions were not

simply a matter of intermural wars between dissonant religious groups.

But the chief proponents of persecution were the European state governments.

Now, what Western society learned apparently from the bloody persecutions of sixteenth

and seventeenth century was that when a particular religion is elevated to a privileged position

by the state, that is, when a particular religion is, as we call it, 'established,' then all

of the powers of that government -- the power of the sword, the power of the army and so

on -- may be brought to bear, to squelch and to persecute those who have a differing religious

viewpoint.

And so by the time our nation as a republic was officially formed with the Constitution

and the Bill of Rights, the fathers of our country were very, very careful to do everything

in their power to prevent the same type of setup that had produced the violent persecutions,

and hatred, and religious wars that had occurred in Europe.

And fundamentally two things we're determined by the Constitution.

The first is that in this nation guaranteed by the Constitution, all religions will have

the right of free expression.

That, of course, as you know, ladies and gentlemen, is the First Amendment of the United States,

but it's only part of the First Amendment and it's only part of the clause with which

the church is so jealously concerned.

The First Amendment in the Constitution also explicitly prohibit the establishment of religion.

That is, of granting special ecclesiastical privilege to Presbyterians instead of Roman

Catholics, to Roman Catholics instead of Jews, to Jews instead of Muslims.

Part of the whole melting pot concept was whatever you believe and whatever are the

particulars of your theological persuasion and your worship, you are welcome to express

those religious beliefs and practices freely under the protection of the state.

At the same time, in order to secure both things namely the guarantee of the free exercise

of religion on the one hand and the restraint against attempts of one religion to usurp

authority over all others, we had the laws established to prohibit one church from becoming

the state church.

And so we developed a concept that has often been called the separation of church and state.

Now, what I'd like to do in our time together in this session is to try to get some clarity

about what that concept means because I detect a considerable amount of confusion about what

is meant by the separation of church and state.

I have to say that in my teaching profession in the Theological Seminary sometimes I get

very agitated and excited with my students and I say, "One of the most important distinctions

as a student of theology you will ever learn is the distinction between a distinction and

a separation."

For example, in our view of man as Christians we distinguish between the soul and the body

of a human being.

Now, when I make a philosophical distinction of that type, I do no personal violence or

personal harm to you or anyone else, but if I separate your soul from your body I have

just killed you.

So we need to understand the difference between a separation and a distinction -- and what

the framers of our original documents of the government -- we're trying to get at was that

we must distinguish between the church on the one hand and the state on the other as

two distinct institutions and each institution has its particular identity, its particular

agenda, its particular responsibility and its particular calling.

It is not the task of the church to create a standing army.

It is not the task of the church to deliver the mail.

It is not the task of the church to wage war, to bear the sword.

It is the task of the church to preach the Gospel of Christ.

It is the task of the church to administer the sacraments, to pray, to worship, to do

all of these things that we associate with particular religious endeavors.

By the same token, it is not the responsibility of the state to administer the sacraments

or again to establish the religious practices of a given denomination or world religion.

These are distinct institutions, and insofar as we may distinguish them and recognize that

there are boundaries to the sphere of authority of each of these then we can talk properly

of separation.

But I'm afraid that in recent years, the very idea of separation of church and state has

come to mean one of two things -- the divorce of church and state.

As if these two institutions were intrinsically and essentially mutually exclusive opponents.

That was not the original idea.

If it were the original idea, the framers of our constitution would not have stressed

so heavily the inalienable right of free exercise of religion.

There're lots of people who today who are very hostile to Judaism, to Christianity,

to Islam, to any religion, and they would hope that we would die from this exercise

of it that the exercise would bring a fatal heart attack or something so that we would

just dry up and go away.

But at that point people are in conflict, not only with the church, but with the state

as it was originally intended.

Now, as I say, both institutions have their particular roles to perform.

And as far as the role of government, that belongs to the state, not to the church, and

the church by its own theology, by Scripture itself, is commanded by God to bend over backward

to be submissive to the civil magistrates.

I'll give you an example of it that's right in front of your eyes at this very moment.

If you look behind me you will see two flags.

On this side, we see of course the American flag.

On this side the flag that is presented here is the flag of the Christian church.

Two flags -- the church and the state.

But there is a law in our land that governs and regulates the display of the flag of the

United States.

And it says that when another flag is displayed along with the flag of the United States that

the flag of the United States must be in the superordinate position while the other flag

is in a subordinate position which is defined by Congress as the right and in the left.

So as I face you on my right stands the American flag.

On my left stands the Christian flag.

Symbolically saying that the church by allowing its standard and its flag to fly at a subordinate

position to the state flag, the church is saying that in civil matters the church is

to obey and submit to the government.

Now, of course that does not mean that the church is saying that the state is the ultimate

authority.

The church is not trying to commit treason against God by submitting to the state but

rather the church understands its responsibility of obeying the civil magistrates as actually

being a part of the church's duty as declared by God.

That God said that 'If you're going to obey me then you must also obey the rulers who

I have placed over you.'

Now that gets us to the other point that is often overlooked in our culture today, is

that in the original concept of the division of labor between church and state, the idea

was this, that the church is established by God, it's created by God, it's ordained by

God, it's instituted by God, and its regulated by God.

And yet at the same time, the state as an institution is ordained by God, created by

God, instituted by God, regulated by God and is supremely and ultimately accountable to

God.

In simple terms, ladies and gentlemen, that means that in the original concept of this

distinction of church and state, the state recognized that the state was not autonomous,

that the state was not a law unto itself but that the state itself is under God.

And to be under God means to be accountable to His authority.

So the distinction originally, dear friends, was not between the sacred and the secular,

but it tacitly assumed theism not defined in the peculiarities of Christianity or Judaism

or Islam, but recognizing that we are all, church and state, and everybody created by

God and accountable to God.

In other words, ladies and gentlemen, United States as a government and as a state was

not formulated officially as a Christian nation, but it was formed initially officially as

a theistic nation.

And the issue today has become not so much the separation of church and state but rather

the separation of state and God.

That's a big difference, isn't it?

Between saying the church and the state are separate, but both under God to moving to

the idea that we are separating the state from God as if the state could be a rival

to God or could be autonomous.

A law unto itself.

That was not the original plan and there's nothing in our subsequent legal history that

has overthrown that basic premise of the original documents of our country.

Now, the problem we have as I mentioned in our first session is that when we get to this

question of abortion, people were saying "Wait a minute, those who are most vociferous in

their opposition against abortion tend to be speaking out from religious platforms,

and from religious convictions, and representing religious institutions."

When the first question of abortion was raised even before Roe v. Wade, the most outspoken

group against abortion in America was the Roman Catholic Church and many, many people

who were not affiliated with the Roman Catholic Church or adherence to the Roman Catholic

Church were offended by that and they felt that their personal rights were being violated

by this unwarranted intrusion into the public arena of debate by a particular ecclesiastical

institution.

And that sense of fear of intrusion and fear of religious manipulation has not diminished

as the fuel has been added to the debates of abortion, but it has of course increased

in sometimes, in some cases, to the point of intensity.

And that is no small matter because I think all of us have some understanding of what

happens in nations when religious wars break out, and when states intrude too heavily into

religious affairs and religious institutions, intrude too heavily and unlawfully into government

affairs.

Now, some have come to the place where they believe that the church has its sphere, the

state has its sphere and one thing the church must never do is to speak out on political

issues or on government issues.

We recognize the right of the church to speak to religious issues but the question I have

tonight is "What about ethical issues?"

Most churches, historically, all the way back to Old Testament Israel have seen that part

of their religious duty was to exercise what is called 'prophetic criticism' to the culture

in which they live.

John the Baptist, you remember, was executed by King Herod because John the Baptist made

a criticism of the King's ethical behavior.

I mean the vast history of religion has been this: that we are not supposed to use the

sword on people.

But the freedom to speak on ethical issues is seen not merely as freedom to churches

but as a duty imposed by God.

I cannot freely exercise my religion if the state forces me to be silent on ethical questions.

I said earlier that the New Testament, for example, stresses that Christians are to bend

over backwards to be models of civic obedience to honor the state, to honor the king, to

honor the prince, to honor the government rather than to be rebellious and anarchist

in their mentality unless, or until, the state commands the church to do something that God

forbids or forbids the church from doing something that God commands.

We remember in the very first century there were dreadful persecutions launched by the

Roman government against the emerging Christian church.

And the Christians of that time were ordered by the government to stop preaching.

On the one hand, they had their mandate from God to be models of civil obedience but now

the civil magistrate is saying to them "you must not preach any more," and at that point

you remember what the apostles did.

They say "We have a dilemma here.

Do we obey God or do we obey man?"

Whenever there is a clear conflict there, the only right thing that any religious person

can do is to obey God.

That does not mean that we are free to exercise civil disobedience willing nilly.

That does not mean that we have the right to disobey the civil magistrates whenever

we disagree with them or whenever we're inconvenienced by them.

If they impose a burdensome tax, we're to pay it.

If they pass laws that we disagree with, we are to obey them unless by obeying them we

are actually disobeying God.

And so it's a very complicated matter, isn't it, to understand how that relationship is?

But religious institutions not only have a religious view of the church and a religious

view of life and of human beings.

But virtually every religion has a religious view or a theological perspective on the role

of government.

I'd like to take a moment or two to remind you of the lessons that are set forth in Paul's

Epistle to the Romans in the thirteenth chapter of that book, which is the classical location

in the New Testament wherein the role of the government is defined.

Paul begins with an admonition directed to Christians.

He's not speaking to non-Christians, to unbelievers.

He's speaking to believers when he says, "Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers

for there is no power but of God and the powers that be are ordained of God."

There's irony here, isn't it?

Here, the Apostle Paul is writing to Christians living in Rome.

He said "I want every one of you to be submissive and subjective to the civil government."

He says that because there is no authority, there is no power ultimately, the Apostle

says, except that power and authority that comes from and is derived from God himself.

The powers that be are ordained of God.

Can you imagine how difficult that would've been for Christians living in Rome under one

of the most corrupt governments imaginable?

For their leader to say to them "Hey, be careful here.

Bend over backwards.

Obey and honor the civil magistrates because those civil magistrates, even the Roman Emperor,

is ordained of God".

It makes you wonder whether Paul still believed that when the power of the sword of the Roman

Emperor was used on his neck and he was killed.

But Paul never challenged the right of the government to govern.

But then he goes on to talk about this a little further when he says "whoever resists the

authority resist the ordinance of God, and they that resist shall receive in themselves

judgment.

For rulers are not a terror to good works but to the evil."

And he goes on to say that the governor is called to be a minister of God.

I'm a minister in the church but our elected officials are called to be ministers of God

every much -- to every degree as I am or any clergyman is.

But he ministers not by serving in the church but by serving in this institution called

the state.

Now again, if we consider the role of the state, we see that both in terms of the Jus

Gentium, the natural law of which we've already spoken, as well as the theological principles

that come to bear on that -- on that subject -- is that there are two most primary or most

basic, I should say, reasons for the very existence of any state government.

The first, ladies and gentlemen, is to maintain, to defend, to protect and to promote human

life.

That's the raison d'etat of human government.

Government exists to protect the lives of its people.

Secondly, to protect the property of its people.

And then also, as I said, the second most basic thing really is defined in terms of

the establishment and promotion of justice.

The protection of life, defending of life, the maintenance of life, and the establishment

and promotion of justice, ladies and gentlemen, are the justification, the moral justification

for any government's existence.

And that those things that I've just mentioned, not only are the chief responsibilities of

the government to carry out, but both of those areas are intensely ethical.

I don't think the church does have the right to lobby the state to get preferential treatment

in their church raffles, or preferential treatment in their taxes or preferential treatment in

the administration of the sacraments and that sort of thing.

But when the state fails to be the state, when the state becomes lax in defending and

promoting and maintaining human life, when the state loses a passionate commitment to

justice, then ladies and gentlemen, the church must speak and every Christian is called to

speak and to vote on these areas.

No Christian ever has the right to vote for his own personal vested interests.

No Christian ever has the right to vote for an unjust law.

In other words, no Christian, no person ever has the right to do what is wrong.

Let me say it again.

No one ever has the right to do what is wrong.

But how many times have you heard this phrase, in the midst, not only the abortion controversy,

but every time an ethical issue is in dispute in terms of civil legislation?

You hear it.

It's become almost a refrain.

"You can't legislate morality."

Now again, that phrase, that maxim has undergone an evolution, a change in its historic meaning.

Originally, people protested against passing laws that tried to curb or restraint or restrict

the mortality of people.

And people were saying "You know, just because you pass a law against stealing does not mean

now automatically no one will ever steal," because people will find ways to break laws,

and -- but morality in this sense that you can't legislate morality originally meant

you can't legislate behavior.

You can pass laws that you hope will give moral direction and perhaps influence the

morality of the community, but the very fiat, the very act of enacting the law doesn't in

and of itself change the behavior.

But the way that phrase is used today means you can't legislate morality means we shouldn't

have the government involved by passing laws that touch upon moral issues.

That's not the government's job.

The government's job is to be taking care of economic problems and so on, but the government

and the state should not be passing laws that regulate moral behavior.

I've asked you to examine some of these things carefully.

How carefully must you examine a statement like that to see how frivolous it really is?

I mean what else do we legislate but morality?

What else do we legislate as government, but those matters that are intensely ethical.

Ladies and gentlemen, whether or not you steal from your neighbor is an ethical and moral

issue.

Whether or not you drive your automobile on the highway with reckless abandon in a way

that makes you a clear and present danger to anybody that happens to come in your path

is a moral issue.

Ladies and gentlemen, homicide is a moral issue.

In fact, levels of taxation become moral issues.

Matters of regulating ecology are moral and ethical issues.

If you say that the government doesn't have or shouldn't be involved in legislating in

areas that are of ethical import or moral import, about all you have given your elected

officials responsibility of doing is determining the state flag.

You can't even have them decide the state bird because whatever bird is particularly

elevated in the state house will get special ecological advantages over the other, it might

upset the whole balance of nature, and that's an ethical matter.

Don't you see that when we are in the arena of legislation, we are dealing with profoundly

ethical issues, none perhaps or deeply ethical than this question of abortion.

My convictions on abortion have been strongly influenced by my religious convictions and

my theological convictions.

Does that mean now that as a Christian, I'm disenfranchised from speaking on this question?

Does that mean that anyone who is persuaded of a particular ethic from a religious orientation

no longer has the right to vote?

Again, I still don't have the right to vote my religious convictions that would bind another

person's theological conscience but it is the role of the church to be the church.

And it is the responsibility of the state to be the state, to promote justice, to defend

life, to protect life wherever that life is found.

For more infomation >> Abortion: What Is the Relationship of Church and State? - Duration: 32:26.

-------------------------------------------

What is the relationship between faith and actions? - Duration: 2:09.

Any faith that does not have actions is dead, that's what St. James tells us in the Bible.

So we can believe in God, but if we believe that God is love, that God gave his only Son for our sake, that he sacrificed so much,

how can we live without sacrificing for each other?

If we really believe that God loves the human race that much, can we really live as if we are alone?

As if the only thing that matters is ourself?

So if we believe in the love and kindness, and the mercy that God has for the human person,

then I think to believe is to reflect that mercy.

To also be willing to sacrifice, to consider the happiness of other people as equally important to your own.

So in that sense, faith without works is dead, because it's just an abstract faith in notions of God, but it doesn't spring into action.

There's a great saying by the Russian writer Fyodor Dostoevsky.

He says it's easy to love the human race: let's just say I love everyone.

But it's so difficult to love that one person next to me. That one person who is annoying, that one person in the street perhaps who smells.

And that is exactly what we are about. Because I cannot save the entire human race. I don't have to, Jesus already did.

And I cannot feed every hungry person in the world, I cannot shelter every homeless person in the world.

But I can ask myself: who do I see in the street? Who do I meet in my life? What can I do to help that person?

And if they're not around, then maybe I should ask myself: am I looking close enough?

Because everywhere, people suffer, in so many ways, and it's so tragic.

Imagine the difference we can make as a Church, because there are so many of us.

And if we all make that little difference, what a change we are in the world, what a force for good we are.

For more infomation >> What is the relationship between faith and actions? - Duration: 2:09.

-------------------------------------------

Signs that you must end the relationship - Duration: 3:48.

For more infomation >> Signs that you must end the relationship - Duration: 3:48.

-------------------------------------------

Breaking News - Deschamps unconcerned by Paul Pogba and Jose Mourinho's relationship - Duration: 2:01.

France manager Didier Deschamps is not concerned about the relationship between his star player Paul Pogba and Manchester United manager Jose Mourinho

Pogba and Mourinho's relationship is poor, with the manager stripping the midfielder of the vice-captaincy after he criticised United's defensive tactics

Mourinho was then caught on camera having a frosty exchange with Pogba at the United training ground, while his team are currently undergoing their worst league start for 29 years

A new nadir was reached this week, following United's goalless Champions League draw with Valencia, where Pogba claimed he has been banned from speaking to the media

None of this is a concern for Deschamps, who coached a very different Pogba at the World Cup in Russia this summer

Pogba was a key driving force with some magnificent performances as France won the tournament, beating Croatia 4-2 in the final in Moscow

Deschamps feels a change of scenery and pressure will be good for Pogba as France gear up to resume their UEFA Nations League campaign

Speaking at a press conference on Thursday, Deschamps said: 'I'm not worried at all and I'm not Jose Mourinho

'I do not want to interfere in their affairs, everything is clear with Paul, you have to balance things out

The setting is different when they find themselves in the French team.' France face Germany in their latest Nations League encounter, after Les Bleus play Iceland in a friendly

For more infomation >> Breaking News - Deschamps unconcerned by Paul Pogba and Jose Mourinho's relationship - Duration: 2:01.

-------------------------------------------

Abraham Hicks 2018 🙂 Relationship With Prosperity 🙂 No ads during video - Duration: 15:50.

Yay, thank you. A couple different things. A couple months ago I had to spot that

I'm gonna be a millionaire. There was no resistance, there was no asking where why

any of that, it was just the truth. I don't have millions but it's coming. This

week and what I want to do is talk with you about like this where I turn that

off? Say again. Where I turn that off? So let me give you an example. So this week I

get to LAX I'm what's here for work all week I go to the hotel marriott 150

bucks for the room. I'm happy. Parking was fifty dollars I went nuts like I don't

usually go nuts but it was like just really bothered me and so I had to say

something to the valet guy and I had to say something to the manager. You know, I

was just like I'm it just it was beyond me. And then, she comped it. And that felt

okay, but it didn't feel right. I felt like I don't have to go through

something I have to get that. Oh not only that it completely distorted

how the universe works. Exactly. You threw a fit. I did. And then someone who doesn't

like to see fits being thrown, adjusted things, which sort of gives you the

impression as it does all people who have both feet stuck in the

manifestation of world. Rather than in the vibrational reality world. It gave

you the impression that, that's how you get what you want, you throw a fit. And

then other people compensate. Because it gives you the impression that, the goods

are held by other humans, who have been withholding them for you. And that they

hold the key to whether you get it or not. But they can only yield to you or

withhold from you in really mediocre term. The big stuff never comes through

fit throwing. Right, and so my concern is by focusing on that am I slowing down?

Right, I know, I'm slowing you down. But help me with this like, first getting

over that. Don't throw fits. What if I...Do you have any

other questions? No, but what if what haha right. What if I don't want to pay $50

for parking, how can I manifest that? Go somewhere else.

I like that hotel. Then pay the $50 and don't throw the fit. These are the

co-operative components. I want the red dot to connect to the red dot but now

it's in the way with the blue dot. Well I don't want the blue dot to be in the way

of the red dot. Well then figure it out. Figure it out. There's a way to figure it

out. There's a way to get it all. But the path isn't through manipulating others,

and getting them to give in or to compensate for you. The way to it is by

finding a way to be satisfied anyway. And in satisfaction, you will then be guided.

The impulse will come, to give you whatever you want. Now there are two ways

that you're looking at this. We can feel your thoughts in the room. There are two

things that you think would be the result of changing the way you look at

it. In other words, find a way to feel satisfied and so some are thinking - well

then one solution then would come is that he would still pay the $50, but he

wouldn't mind it. And another group are thinking - the hotel will stop charging so

much for parking. So he will only have to pay, nothing? Nothing pretty much trump's

something, doesn't it? Esther discovered that she can't charge little enough for

the recordings, to keep people from just stealing them and putting them online,

for nothing. Because nothing always trump's. In other words, maybe I could

charge nine dollars or eight or seven or six. But if she's even charging $1.00,

there are those that will say well nothing is better than one dollar. And so

the two solutions that most humans find is that either the Marriott will stop

overcharging for its parking, which seems like a solution.Or I will have so much

satisfaction going on that I'm not bothered by the fact that they are. And

we want to call your attention to yet a third solution - if you are determined to

feel satisfied. So you're not willing, to give away your satisfaction based upon

something you have no control over. You think

you've got control, because somebody tried to bend the laws of the universe

by responding to your fit. Which just teaches you to throw a fit, and throw a

fit, and throw a fit, and throw a fit and throw a fit. So you keep getting little

crumbs of finances while you feel miserable the whole way. And miserable is

a long way from satisfied. But if you were to bite the bullet and be happy for

just a little while, we know it's a big price to pay. But if you were to really

care about feeling satisfied. What would happen is - abundance would flow in. And

the $50 would feel irrelevant to you, in the scheme of all of the abundance that

is flowing to you. So you could for example, you could acknowledge, let's get

your yellow pad out, in its first thing in the morning. And we've inspired you to

write your pad. And you think the Marriott charged $50 for parking. This

just seems like price gouging. And it just feels like such unfairness. And I

can't change it, let's say I can't throw enough fits, to really solve that all the

time. And so I want to find some way of soothing myself. So I'm going to try to

take that subject that prickly, annoying maybe even more than annoying subject of

dissatisfaction and beyond. And I'm gonna see if I can find any satisfaction in it.

So because you want to feel better, you go down that path. And you think most

things are about supply and demand, and clearly there's not unlimited parking.

And so they've got to find some way of sorting it out what I feel better having

no parking available because they've given it all away to all the people that

got here first because there was no way for people to

discriminate. If Esther charged nothing for this seminar there would be no room

for the majority of you who are here now. The supply and the demand if there was

no charge for the parking it may have very well been all filled up and no

place for you to park at all. Is that more or less satisfying? Well that's less

satisfying. I am appreciative that there was a place for me to park. They could

just get so tired of people complaining about the parking situation. People that

aren't willing to pay for the cost of the parking structure, who aren't willing

to pay for the security of the parking structure, who don't care about the

maintenance of the parking structure, who don't care about the maintenance. The

management could just be so tired of dealing with people who are so upset

about parking that there could just be no more parking. Would that be more

satisfying? No, that's less satisfying. Well what's more satisfying? Parking. Well

how can i soothe that? So it's only the money and the parking that's bothering

me. So is it really what they're charging because there are all kinds of things

that you can spend your money on. Are you throwing a fit over every.... Ester

remembers finding the blouse many many years ago that cost so much money and

she could not afford it and she was furious with the department store that

they would have the gall to ask that much money for something that she really

wanted that she couldn't afford. It was like how wrong can you be? Why would you

do that to me? Why would you cause me to want something that I believe I can't

have. I believe I cannot park with these. I believe that I cannot afford to park

with these. My feeling about my personal prosperity is such that, I cannot buy for

myself ease. I have to buy for myself instead suffering. I'll park ten miles

away and I'll walk in. I'll uber-in, I'll uber-in, I'll uber-in. Then I don't have

any parking to do. I'll uber-in. What? You want sixty five dollars to get from the

airport to the hotel. Are you crazy? You gotta let them do whatever they're doing

and you got to decide that you can't find your happiness by controlling them.

Because there's always going to be another one that is uncontrollable. All

you can control is your relationship with your prosperity. And that's what

this is about. This is about your relationship with your prosperity. It's

not about how much parking costs? It's about your relationship with your

prosperity. And that bless it contrasting over charging parking garage, pointed

out to you, the imbalance in you, about your financial abundance and prosperity.

It just showed you that, you're not in balance yet. You're still wanting

others to do the adjustments, so that you can be prosperous. I want the whole world

to charge list for everything and then I'll be rich. If everybody would just

give everything away then I wouldn't need money that I don't have. So to

continue that story the company paid the money, so it's not even mine.

And B the next day I went to another Marriott and again they had $15 parking

there they never charged me, then the third Marriott I went to charge me 30

but I decided at the, at the counter. I decided I wanted peace more than I

wanted to have, be upset about parking and then when I got here this time. The

nice guy caught me and I just said oh and he said that's okay I'll take care

of it. So it felt like... just out of the blue? He just, I just said, I said well

that's a little high, no not out of the blue. You expressed your lack full

prosperity consciousness and expected someone to yield to you. And that will

get you a little ways down the road. But it won't make you rich. So then, so the

thing is just is to surrender all that, just surrender that whole process, that

thinking. Maybe surrender is the right word but a better word is decide that the way

you feel is what matters the most. You see what you're describing here, is

what a lot of people are doing. It's a very conditional response to life. You

charge me too much, I will respond with negative emotion. If you charge me just

right, I will respond with more positive emotion. So my emotion is controlled by

what you do. Which means I'm in a world of hurt all the time because I got to

control you, now I'm good, I'm developing my skill at getting free parking. I show

up, I act a little irritated and then you caught me.

So I've got my conditional living down pretty good. And when I'm living in a

world where that's the way we play the game. The more we complain, the more

people who don't want to fight yield, the more people who believe that the

customer's always right, give the complaining customer what they

want. But that complaining customer holds themself in a state of constant

aggravation and pushing against. It's a price far, far too great to pay. Because

while you're saving $15 or $50 on parking, you're cutting yourself off from

the resources, from the replenishment of source energy, from the good ideas, from

the flow of life, from being in sync with your inner being

who knows where all the treasures are that you've got buried in your

vibrational reality. That's really what we're wanting you to hear. Anybody can

win if you're playing a tug of war in a physical world and you got people on

each end of a rope and you've got this line that you're trying to drag each

other across, the most determined ones, the ones with the most muscle, the ones

that, in other words it's easy to understand why one group would win a

battle over another group. But this goes back to the question that we were

talking about earlier. You didn't come to battle against one another. You came to

make peace with your own alignment. You came to make peace with your own inner

being. You came to utilize the leverage that the universe has already lined up

for you. You see you forget your worthiness when you fight with pettiness

over peanuts. It's like you forget, how worthy you really are, when you're

demanding of what comes to you, you've forgotten what's being offered to

you. You forget that not only is it just being offered to you it's being offered

to you in specific proportion and in perfect accuracy of detail of everything

that your life has caused you to ask for. If you could see the vortex, that you've

created and understand the care with which your inner being is aware of it.

And understand that your inner being knows each and everything that you've

asked for, and you're deserving of all of it, and knows your vibrational

relationship to every bit of it. If you could just accept that a little bit, or

just find a reason to feel satisfied and watch how much the universe yields

to you. It is our promise to you, that you will stop feeling like you need to,

nitpick over who else is doing whatever they're doing. See what happens is when

you've got your feet in this physical world, you want so much for them to get

you. That's why you complain to the valet guy, and then you complain to the front

desk, and then you complain to the manager, you'd go all the way to the

Supreme Court, if you could, in order to get them to get you. Because you're so

sure that you are right, and what we want you to understand is you can be

absolutely right with the facts and crossways of your own vibration. Because

it doesn't matter how right you are this watered up anger and negative

emotion is preventing you from your connection with what really will lead

you to all of the ultimate things that you've been asking for.

There is no giant right and wrong in the sky. There's just you letting in what

you're asking for and you're not letting in what you're asking for. And when

you're demanding it of other people you're not even beginning to let it in.

Because they don't hold the keys to your kingdom, you do. And your emotion is

letting you know, whether you're flown in the direction of all the resources that

are all lined up for you or whether you're pulling against them. And all right we

understand, nothing makes you feel more like throwing a fit than moving away

from who you really are. Nothing makes you feel more justified in your anger

than to be pinching off the resources especially when you've thought as much

as you've thought and you've put as much as you've put there and you care as much

as you care. Nothing feels worse than moving in opposition to that. And there's

not enough comp tickets in the world to compensate from moving away from what

you naturally will receive. It's not just money, it's not just values and deals. Its

clarity, and it's a timing, and it's rhythm, and it's replenishment, and it's

ideas. It's being in the right place at the right time.

It's feeling your worthiness, it's feeling your absolute power, it's knowing

that you can be or do or have anything that you choose, it's knowing that no one

can stand in your way, it's knowing that nothing is in

way, except some beliefs that you picked up along your physical trail that no

longer

you

For more infomation >> Abraham Hicks 2018 🙂 Relationship With Prosperity 🙂 No ads during video - Duration: 15:50.

-------------------------------------------

8 Pieces of Advice for Ending a Relationship on a Good Note|HFE♪ - Duration: 9:09.

8 Pieces of Advice for Ending a Relationship on a Good Note

Ending a relationship with someone in a healthy and considerate way could be the start of the healing process and positive growth.

In most cases, ending a relationship isn't easy.

This is especially true because emotions can run high and it can be hard for us to end an era, too.

After everything, it's never easy to say goodbye.

  In this kind of situation, we don't only have to grapple with our own interior world, but also with the emotions of the other person.

When someone is really important to us, we try hard to find the right words or do the right things to minimize their hurt.

By doing so, in a way we're looking for some assurance that things will be okay.

To help both people move forward and find their own paths after the end of a relationship, we need to think about the following aspects.

Don't wait for the perfect moment Some people can't bring themselves to end a relationship because they think that there's a perfect moment to end it.

The truth is very different.

There isn't a perfect time for the end and, thus, we shouldn't wait to do it.

  Trying to find the perfect circumstances to bring an end to a relationship can hurt us just as much, or even more, than being indifferent to the situation.

We suggest that you prepare yourself for the break-up when you feel like the relationship that you're in isn't going anywhere.

For starters, you can stop making plans together.

This step will prepare you to open the conversation.

Remember that you don't need anyone's permission, nor do you need to be better than anyone to end a relationship.

Not wanting to be in the relationship anymore is more than enough reason to end it.

You need to be able to trust yourself as well as your decisions and good will.

Prepare the setting for ending a relationship Once you're ready to end a relationship, look for a tranquil place where you can have a good conversation. Avoid distractions and stressful elements.

It can be anywhere as long as you feel comfortable and can easily talk without feeling watched or judged.

Don't forget to mention good things about the other person Sincerity is key in every conversation.

However, when ending a relationship, it's even more necessary.

In addition to sincerity, it's important to remember the positive aspects of the relationship.

Also, you should remember the positive traits of the other person to let them know that you appreciated them and cared deeply for them.

Sometimes we're afraid to start the conversation because we know that we'll immediately be labeled as the bad guy.

However, if you know why the relationship won't work, you have to talk about it as soon as possible.

Doing so will give both of your the chance to grow and look for other relationships.

End the relationship face-to-face Digital media can make communicating easier but they can't replace certain things entirely.

When we have to end a relationship, the best way of doing it is by getting together, in person, face-to-face.

We all need a little dedication from the part of others.

Especially when we need explanations.

Think about it: don't hurt others in the ways you don't want others to hurt you.

If you're worried about not being able to express yourself properly, organize your ideas first.

You can use whichever method that you prefer, even on paper, but the most important thing is finding the physical space and time for the other person.

Make sure to use clear words Sometimes, we think that talking about ending a relationship is enough to end it, even without being clear in what we're saying.

The problem is that for one person, the message might be clear, but for the other, not so much.

In order to prevent any kind of confusion or any doubt on the other end, be specific with your words: "end", "stop being a couple", "separate".

Speaking as such with help both of you understand the situation clearly.

It's the first step for moving forward.

Don't compare Even if you think you have the worst relationship, don't compare yourself to the other person. Comparing is embittering and doesn't help you in any way.

Keep in mind that both of you worked together and though it didn't work out, there were always some good moments.

If you're currently in another relationship, or if you're seeing someone new and that's why you've decided to end your current relationship, avoid making the other person feel bad about it. It's not healthy for you, nor for anyone.

7. Assume your responsibilities and avoid punishing the other person In a romantic relationship, there are two people.

Those two people are responsible for what happens between them.

So, blaming your partner for deciding to end the relationship isn't healthy.

Remember that blaming the other person implies that there's a need for punishment. There is no reason for you to punish anyone.

Take a deep breath During a breakup, it's normal to go through a lot of emotions.

At some point, your partner might be harsh or make hurtful comments.

When you notice that happening, suggest taking a breather.

Go out for a walk or even just look out at the horizon in silence for a few minutes.

With these tips for ending a relationship, we hope that you can overcome it as best you can.

You can do it!.

For more infomation >> 8 Pieces of Advice for Ending a Relationship on a Good Note|HFE♪ - Duration: 9:09.

-------------------------------------------

Genogram – Family Relationship Diagram - Duration: 51:32.

JOYCE: Thank you and welcome

to the Child Welfare Information Technology Systems

Managers and Staff Webinar Series

brought to you on behalf of

the Health and Human Services Administration

for Children and Families Children's Bureau,

and presented by ICF International.

Today's webinar features staff from Indiana and Ohio,

who will discuss their experiences and challenges

in developing and implementing Genogram

or Family Relationship Diagram functionality.

I am Joyce Rose, your host and facilitator for today's webinar.

Next slide, please.

Attendees are encouraged to participate in our webinar

with questions and comments.

All of our participant lines are muted now,

but we will open them for the Q and A session

at the end of the discusson.

However, please be aware that you can submit questions

at any time using the GoToWebinar chat feature,

and those will be queued up and addressed

during the standard Q and A session.

Once today's webinar has ended,

you may submit additional questions to

the email address listed above, or to your federal analyst.

I want to thank our participants from Indiana and Ohio

for their exceptional time and effort

in preparing for this webinar.

So, let's meet them starting with Indiana. LaTrece?

LATRECE: Hello, I'm LaTrece Thompson,

and I'm the Deputy Director of Staff Development.

MARY: Hi, I'm Mary Engle, I'm the Assistant Director

for IU's Training Partnership.

WITNEY: My name is Witney Ortiz,

and I'm a Peer Coach Consultant in Indiana.

JOYCE: Ohio?

KEVIN: Kevin Bullock, Bureau Chief

for the Bureau of Automated Systems

here at the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services.

MELISSA: Hi, this is Melissa Palmer.

I'm one of the Business Analysts

here with the Ohio SACWIS Project.

MICHELE: And this is Michele Lidle.

I'm also a SACWIS Business Analyst.

JOYCE: Thank you. And next slide please.

So just to review our agenda quickly.

We will be listening to

the Indiana Department of Child Services,

who will explain the use of the GenoPro software

and its applicability for child welfare practice in Indiana.

And then we'll follow the Ohio journey,

which will address their implementation

of Genogram functionality,

and their session will include a live system demo.

So, how about the Indiana team get started. LaTrece?

LATRECE: Hello, so, in this section,

we are going to explain how

the Indiana Department of Child Services

uses the GenoPro software

and its applicability for child welfare practice in Indiana.

The GenoPro is a genealogy mapping software.

GenoPro is intuitively easy to learn and simple to use.

Since 2009, Indiana has used this tool

to develop comprehensive Family Network Diagrams. Next slide.

So, the Family Network Diagram

combines the Genogram and the Ecomap

to identify a family's relationships

as well as a family's community connections.

These diagrams are completed by

the family case manager and the families.

In general, the family case manager

uses the Family Network Diagram

just to gather that useful information,

have a better understanding of what the relational dynamics

are within the family,

and any sort of behavioral problems within that network.

It also promotes the client's self-understanding,

it helps with conducting assessments

and establishing interventions.

So, here is an example of

the Family Network Diagram from GenoPro.

So, GenoPro allows the user to clearly analyze

the family's emotional and social relationships

within that family group.

GenoPro also generates a key that helps others

quickly and easily identify what the family dynamics are

in play with this family just from looking at that.

So some of the benefits for GenoPro.

Indiana's Department of Child Services

chose to use GenoPro because it's a comprehensive approach

of creating a Family Network Diagram.

Additionally, GenoPro supports the two components

of the Family Network Diagram: the Genogram and the Ecomap.

And GenoPro will allow users

to compile thorough and concise Family Network Diagrams.

Once the family case manager has completed the Genogram,

they're able to put that information into GenoPro

using the Family Network Diagram.

So, the family case manager will upload the file

into our case management system,

which is MaGIK here in Indiana.

And then there's an option for both the assessment

or the case to upload the file.

Once that file is uploaded, it's saved as a document

in the case or assessment,

and the family can choose to use the Family Network

as a subject matter

and the Family Network Diagram or Genogram

within the content of that with

uploading all of the information into MaGIK.

MARY: Hi, this is Mary.

And I'm going to start with talking a little bit

about some of the challenges that GenoPro comes with.

So, one of the biggest challenges in utilizing

the software for the case worker

is that it can be time consuming to complete.

However, what we know is that

putting in the time with families

and engaging them from the beginning of the process

builds that trust-based relationship that elicits

a more positive experience as the case progresses.

Secondly, it can require a high level of engagement skills

in order to be successful.

And the Department of Child Services

has provided family case managers with practice questions

that are located in policy

to help guide their use of the Family Network Diagram

with families.

These high-level engagement skills

can take time for case workers to develop,

but by providing some practice support,

it can help case managers feel more confident

with the execution in the field.

Thirdly, if it's done incorrectly,

it could create issues in critical case junctures

within the case.

If the diagram does not provide an accurate picture

of the family's connections,

then it can lead to issues when trying to find

placements for potential guardianships or adoptions.

This is why it's crucial to spend the time

in creating an accurate family network diagram

in the beginning of the case,

and utilize it as a tool throughout the life of the case.

Lastly, all of our DCS computers have GenoPro installed;

however, it can be a challenge when sharing those files

with team members outside of DCS,

like CASA or Service Providers.

If they have not, if they don't have that software

on their own computers,

the case managers are responsible for printing it,

scanning it, and emailing it to them

and to others who are working on the case.

And again, this is not a constant challenge, but

it can be time consuming when that does occur. Next slide.

So, when we talk about risks, what we know is

that it can challenge rapport building.

We found that to probably be the biggest risk

in completing the Family Network Diagram

because families could potentially get defensive

when they're being asked about

their family and social connections.

We know it takes a lot of work and effort

in order to gain the trust of our families,

which is why we built our practice model

upon four core conditions that you see on your screen

in order to work past potential challenges

and work with families.

We know if the family case manager approaches a family

with the Family Network Diagram

or any other case management tool

with genuineness, empathy, professionalism, and respect,

then their rate of success will be much higher.

So in 2009, when GenoPro was introduced,

Staff Development created a Computer Assisted Training

and we call them CATs

to help teach all family case managers

how to use this new tool.

Since that initial rollout,

we've used the same computer system training

as part of our new worker training.

New workers complete the CAT on the GenoPro tool

in their local offices prior to arriving

to Unit 2 of their "cohort training,"

which is what we call New Worker Training in Indiana.

In Unit 2, family case managers

will take the Engagement and Interviewing course,

which will lay the foundation

for understanding and building their practice skills

which are crucial to creating their Family Network Diagram.

And then later, in cohort training,

they will complete the Assessing Child Maltreatment

and Case Planning and Permanency courses,

which will provide training on the specific use

of the Family Network Diagram throughout the case.

By the end of training,

they're provided with opportunities

to practice developing them in GenoPro,

and that most often occurs in the field

during our last few weeks of the training course.

WITNEY: So, in Indiana, some case managers,

they complete the Family Network Diagram with pen and paper.

In Indiana, we highly encourage that

the Family Network Diagram,

which is comprehensive of the GenoPro, is really required.

But it is. So the Family Network Diagram is required.

But it is not a requirement to use GenoPro

to complete it.

Although we do highly encourage

our family case managers to do that.

This can sometimes present a challenge later during the case

if the case gets transferred

or if the employee leaves the agency,

as handwritten diagrams

can be illegible and difficult to really interpret.

This is why we support the use of GenoPro

and the development of these Genograms

so that it is clear and easy to understand

for everyone involved in the case.

It also allows for a digital copy

of the diagram to be available,

which is easier to update and adapt as the case progresses.

And if you all had seen the prior example

of the entire diagram, all the squiggly lines

and the different lines that were on there,

when a person starts writing those with a pen and paper,

it can be very, very challenging to really understand

the relationship that goes back and forth within the family.

Which can also really hinder permanency

for the children here in Indiana.

So we in Indiana, we have ongoing maintenance.

As it was mentioned earlier, GenoPro was installed

and continues to be installed on all new employee computers.

This went into effect in 2009.

The last update that we had was in 2011,

and all of our technical support is provided by GenoPro,

which has been very helpful.

So in Indiana, our current status,

we are currently training and utilizing GenoPro

in conjunction with our practice model here in Indiana

to help achieve permanency.

We've learned that the use of GenoPro

really enables us to understand family dynamics

and to get children to permanency quicker.

In the future, one of the things

that we're planning to do in Staff Development

is incorporate GenoPro throughout other trainings.

Currently, all new trainees receive this training

via a Computer Assisted Training,

but they also incorporate it in other trainings

within their new training experience.

We want to expand that to include it

in our experienced worker training,

to really highlight and really show the importance

of making sure our family case managers

are utilizing the Genograms through GenoPro

so that they can, if there are any questions

from service providers or from the courts,

then they can just print off a legible document

and be able to submit that.

It also is a primary factor in making sure that

as we're moving forward with our practice model in Indiana,

that the GenoPro is utilized.

Some of the lessons that we've learned

have enabled us to understand family dynamics better,

which is one of the key factors

in children reaching permanency.

Some of our future plans is to really,

and I kind of talked about that a little bit,

is really just expanding,

to be included in some of the different trainings throughout,

not just new worker, but to expand it out

in experienced worker training.

MARY: So when we talk about challenges

and risks in our practice model, you know,

one of the skills that we really encourage

and push with our new workers

is the engagement skill that we discussed a little earlier,

and so just another note about that

and the importance of having those foundational skills

as you move forward with a software program like this.

Because everything we put into it is coming from the family

and that empowerment piece for them

is really critical in making sure that this is accurate

and that we're not damaging the relationship

with the families in the process.

So really, this is just part of a holistic approach

to engaging and working closely with children and families

through our practice model,

and involving them in the decisions that are made,

including the decisions about placement and permanency

for their children

and understanding those people that are closest to them

and what their relationships look like.

Can help us in those critical junctures.

If a removal happens, if a placement change happens,

or if any other sort of disruption happens,

we get with our team through our practice model

and we go back to these diagrams that we've developed

and can have some meaningful conversations

about how to move forward with that,

and helping families feel like they really are

driving their case planning progress and their movement

towards permanency.

MELISSA: Good afternoon, this is Melissa

speaking from the Ohio SACWIS Project.

And we are thrilled to be a part of this webinar,

sharing the recent addition of the Genogram

to SACWIS functionality.

To date, our county users have been quite complimentary

of the new Genogram functionality.

As you will soon see, while it is simple in design,

it is a welcome addition to the important work

being done by our Child Welfare case workers.

But before Michele shares with you the "why"

behind Ohio's decision

to implement Genogram functionality into SACWIS,

I would like to offer some contextual information,

or rather background, on Ohio's makeup and our SACWIS project.

Ohio's SACWIS began its rollout in 2007,

having all 88 counties live by 2008.

Ohio's SACWIS serves to support the work

of 88 public children service agencies

and 38 Title IV-E Courts.

The state of Ohio is rich and unique in its size,

as well as its diverse populations

being served across the state,

throughout various suburbs of large cities,

farming communities, small towns, and cities.

Ohio's counties range in size from major metro counties,

serving populations upward of 800,000 or more,

to medium-sized counties

serving populations between 50,000 to 100,000,

to our smaller counties that serve populations

of up to 400,000.

Ohio is one of nine states that is county-administered

and state-supervised.

So when it comes to SACWIS development

of new functionality or enhancements,

it is important that we are tuned to and keep in line with

the pulse of our user community

and the diversity that lies within our 88 counties

in terms of size, cultural diversity,

funding resources, training and knowledge sharing.

Next slide, please.

The work of the SACWIS project is guided by our mission.

The Ohio SACWIS Project Mission

is to provide automated technology solutions

to Ohio's state and local child welfare agencies

that support service delivery and practice

for the safety, permanency and well-being

of our children and families.

The developments of the Genogram functionality

support the project's mission in supporting service delivery

and best practice efforts of our end users,

and their engagement with families as important benchmarks

of safety, permanency and well-being are addressed.

SACWIS' Integrated Project Team, or IPT,

is a critical driving force

in achieving this mission to support the end user.

The IPT is comprised of dedicated business staff

that are responsible for

the development, implementation, maintenance,

and support of Ohio SACWIS.

The work and innovation of the Application Support Team,

Business Support Team, Finance Team, and Reporting Team,

in conjunction with staff from

Ohio's Office of Information Services and Vendor Project,

all support one another

in the creation and execution of Ohio's responsive efforts

to enhance Ohio's SACWIS in supporting

child welfare practitioners in their service delivery.

It is a diligent work of the IPT

in concert with input from our county users

that our Genogram has come to tuition.

And we are here to share this with you today.

So now, without further ado,

I will hand things over to Michele

to talk further about Ohio's journey to Genogram.

MICHELE: Thank you, Melissa.

The Genogram project that we set to implement here in Ohio

is really part of a much larger undertaking

to streamline our relationships data entry overall.

In our SACWIS system,

previously our relationship data was recorded

and stored separately in intake,

in the case, and in the provider area

where we have foster homes and kinship families.

And so, it was possible to have

multiple different relationships

between the same two persons in our system.

With the person- level relationship

Genogram initiative,

which was deployed to our production environment

as recently as December,

we moved the relationship data to the person record,

and at the same time kept it accessible

from various modules and work items throughout our system.

To achieve this, we had millions of

existing relationship records that had to be converted,

and I would say that was one of our biggest challenges.

We had to develop a hierarchy,

and give preference to relationships

associated with adoptive child birth parents,

that's part of our AFCARS data.

Then we had to say what else we wanted to maintain

if we had relationships that didn't agree with each other

in SACWIS and we had to pick one.

So, in the end, all things being equal,

we hoped that the most recently modified relationship

would be the most accurate and we had to go with that.

But as an end result, we now have a system

in which there can only be one distinct relationship pair,

like biological mother and biological son,

between any two people in SACWIS,

which makes the data much more consistent and clean

throughout the system.

The only exception to that rule is in our intake record.

So, if you have an abuse and neglect report,

that will maintain the relationships

between those different parties

at the time of the screening decision

since we know that relationships may change over time

and we want to preserve the integrity of the initial report.

So, the newly designed functionality

makes it easier for our end users to view and maintain

their relationship information,

and incorporates the system-generated Genogram view

of that data.

Additionally, users can now document

extended family relationships,

even if the relatives are not otherwise found

in our SACWIS system,

if they're not members of a SACWIS case,

we can still add those extended family members

and show how they are related

to the families that we're working with.

Our goal was to ensure accurate, consistent data

across all of the different areas of our system,

improve our user experience,

and provide additional tools for family search and engagement.

Because Ohio is a county-administered state

and completion of a Genogram is not something

that is required by our rules,

use of Genograms varies across the different agencies

in our state.

So, our hope was that by incorporating this into SACWIS,

and making it something that can

easily be generated by our system,

that this would expand and support use of the tool

for all the great reasons that Indiana just described

as to how it can be useful for working with families.

So, our Genogram, which I'm going to demonstrate

in just a moment, uses the same standardized Genogram symbols

that our Child Welfare Training Program uses

in the training of new child welfare case workers

when talking about how to use Genograms in the field.

To develop our Genogram, we integrated Go JS software

into our SACWIS system, and this was just what

our project team found to be the best option

for Ohio to meet our goals.

There's information about this software available online.

So I'm going to show you what this looks like

in just a minute.

As you see on our slide here, this is a direct quote

from one of our SACWIS users

who has been using our system since the beginning

and when she first saw our Genogram,

she said this was great and that she loved it.

And just as Indiana was explaining,

using a Genogram can require some skill.

It can be time consuming to complete in the field.

And so, here was a person who had been in child welfare

for a long time and had not wanted to use

Genograms in the past because they seemed complicated.

But having it in SACWIS has been a game-changer for her.

So give me just one second and I will pull up the screen here.

Okay, so, this is a person record in our SACWIS system.

This is a fictitious person that I created today

for purposes of the demonstration

in our test environment.

And we have different modules.

One of them is now relationships.

It has its own module within the person record.

So, if I go to Person Relationships,

I land on a list page that shows

all the different people in SACWIS

who have some relationship to our focus person, "Harry."

I can expand the relationships for any one of these

or all of these people in the list

to see how each of these people are related to my focus person,

as well as how they are related to one another

if that's the case.

We also have an editor view of the relationship,

and if I click on my editor page,

this is where I can add or maintain

the relationships between people.

And this is really so much simpler

than the old way that we had of doing this work in our system,

and so users really do find this

to be much more straightforward and simple,

and they're better able to avoid making mistakes

when setting up the relationship.

It's a simple dropdown with relationship values to select,

and the reciprocal relationships

are automatically generated when a relationship is saved.

We also have the ability with an add button right from here

to add additional people by searching through SACWIS

to pull in others or create brand new people

if they're not found in our system

for the purpose of documenting their relationship.

So, this has been a good help to users,

and this functionality is actually replicated

in various areas in the system.

As I mentioned earlier, all the relationships

live within the person record, if you will,

but they are accessible in our intake module

as well as when you're looking at your family case record.

You can access the same information in the same format,

but the context in the case limits that information

to those folks

who are associated with that case as members,

or even as associated relatives who may not be

members of the case family that you're working with,

but perhaps grandparents or other supportive person

who have some involvement.

Now to the Genogram,

which is the real reason we came here today.

It's just a simple click on the Genogram icon.

And the system renders all the relationship information

in the form of a simple Genogram.

So, as I said earlier, we do use the same basic

Genogram symbols that workers are trained on.

There's a legend here at the bottom of the screen

that shows what the different symbols mean.

We also incorporated some view of person characteristics

that may have been added to a record,

and by color and placement of the shading

we can give you a high-level view of where

some of those attributes may exist within the family.

It's a little hard to see.

It's kind of light on my screen here,

but we do have a yellow highlight

around my focus person, who is Harry.

Whoever I have in focus on the right,

I have this box that shows a person's spotlight.

We give just some basic information about the person,

as well as some of those characteristics I mentioned.

If we have any mental health or substance abuse characteristics

that have been documented or any medical concerns,

those can be shown, and you can get kind of an overview

of the family as far as those things.

I can change my focus person.

If I want to look at Harry's mother instead,

I can just click on that person

and change my person's spotlight information on the right

to showing some information about her.

You'll see on this person, I've also added a safety hazard.

In our system, it's the way to track hazards

that might exist for the case worker's own safety;

things that you'd want to call attention to

such as "This person is a person who has weapons in the home."

That's something a new worker might want to know

when going out.

So, we just highlight some of those things.

And that's our Genogram.

We did incorporate a couple of screen shots of the Genogram

in the slide presentation, so you'll have those for reference.

And that's it for us, I'll turn it back over. Thank you.

JOYCE: Alright. So, here we come. Next Slide.

Next slide.

Next.

Alright, so here is Mr. Bullock's contact information

if anyone who is attending would like to contact him directly,

and we also previously provided Indiana's contact info.

Let's move on then.

That was absolutely excellent. Thank you so very much.

Let's move to the next slide, which is our Q and A session.

I'm going to ask my colleague, Subeera, to run this session.

SUBEERA: Thanks, Joyce.

As a reminder, the PowerPoint is available as a handout.

It's available on the right side of the screen.

If you click on handouts, you can download it for viewing.

Candy, do we have any questions in the queue?

CANDY: Thank you. As a reminder for parties on the phone,

to ask a question press "Star-1."

Please un-mute your line and record your name only

to be introduced.

Again questions from the phone, press "Star-1" please.

If you'd like to withdraw the request, you may press "Star-2."

Thank you. Please stand by for your first question.

SUBEERA: Candy, do we have any questions in the queue?

CANDY: Currently we're showing no questions in the queue.

As a reminder, parties may press "Star-1."

SUBEERA: Okay, I will start with the questions

we're getting through the chat box.

Our first question: Does the Indiana team know

how much the state spends per year to use the GenoPro tool?

LATRECE: No, I do not know the exact cost.

I know that when it was initially installed,

it was at a one-time cost.

But I'm not quite sure of the cost at this time.

SUBEERA: Thank you. Next question.

Is the software integrated within the SACWIS

used by Indiana, or do staff

have to re-enter all of the participant data

when creating the Genogram?

MARY: What was the first part of that question? Sorry.

SUBEERA: Is the software integrated within

the SACWIS used by Indiana,

or do staff have to re-enter all of the participant data

when creating the Genogram?

MARY: We enter it into GenoPro,

and then from there they are able to upload that

into our computer system.

JOYCE: This is Joyce and I have a follow-on question to that.

Given that GenoPro is not integrated

into your SACWIS system, what and who triggers

the GenoPro Family Network Diagram upload

into MaGIK, and how often does it occur?

MARY: So, technically on every case,

whether that's a child needs services case

where the courts are involved, or an informal adjustment,

all of those cases are required to have a Genogram in them

at the time the case transfers from

the assessment worker to the permanency worker.

So ideally, all of them would have them

as far as GenoPro is concerned.

SUBEERA: Candy, do we have any questions in the queue

before we move on to the next one in the chat box?

CANDY: We're currently showing no questions from the phone.

As a reminder, parties again can press "Star-1."

SUBEERA: Thank you. Next question.

Does the Ohio team have an estimate

for the cost of building the Genogram Functionality?

KEVIN: No we don't.

That included both the relationship conversion

and the Genogram, so it's kind of difficult, I think,

for us to split it out and say exactly how much

just the Genogram costs.

That was part of our contract with

our interval deliverable agreement with our vendor.

SUBEERA: Thank you. Does either state have outcome information?

Has this been helpful in finding relatives

as placements for kids in care?

MARY: I know in Indiana, once those are actually completed,

I don't know if there's necessarily been

any formalized data.

But within the local county offices,

the cases who have a really solid, completed Genogram

and an Ecomap through GenoPro,

that Family Network Diagram helps us to figure out

what the underlying needs are for the family,

it helps to figure out who could be potential placements,

and just really working with the family

so we can work with them from the inception of the case,

so we have case closure faster.

MELISSA: So as far as Ohio, our Genogram functionality

has only been in about two months,

so we don't have a lot of feedback yet

as far as what impact that may have.

But we do hope that we'll find more county agencies

utilizing a Genogram, because we know

there are many agencies who do use the Genogram

as part of their regular practice.

And we're just hoping that this will maybe make their lives

a little easier as well as kind of expand that use.

SUBEERA: Thank you. I will move on to the next question.

Does GenoPro work on a specific operating system,

or is it available for multiple platforms?

LATRECE: Can you repeat that question?

SUBEERA: Does GenoPro work on a specific operating system,

or is it available for multiple platforms?

LATRECE: So in Indiana, GenoPro,

our IT team automatically uploads the program

on every family case manager's computer.

That's where they use it

and that's where they put all the information in.

They don't use it on any other equipment.

MARY: And the computers that are delivered to our staff members

are all Microsoft operating systems utilizing Windows.

I don't know what the current version of Windows is for that.

So we have not experimented, at least to my knowledge,

with Apple systems or anything else.

And so, right now, we're just looking at the Windows systems.

SUBEERA: Thank you.

Candy do we have any questions in the queue?

CANDY: We're showing no questions.

Again, it's "Star-1" for questions, please.

SUBEERA: Thank you.

I will move on to the next question in the chat box.

Do staff in your states have tablets or laptops

to engage families in the field?

LATRECE: So in Indiana, our staff do have laptops.

KEVIN: In Ohio, with us being county-administered,

it depends on the county.

But many of our county children services agencies

do deploy some sort of mobile device.

We know that they're using all platforms

to access our application.

SUBEERA: Thank you. I will move on to the next question.

How do either of the states address Native American history

for the purposes of ICWA? Or "I," "C," "W," "A."

MELISSA: Yes, we do have functionality

incorporated within our person module to capture

and we document that the family was asked

about their Native American heritage.

We also document notifications,

we can generate notifications to the tribe from within SACWIS,

as well as documentation of the outcome

and whether or not the membership was verified.

So, we do have all of that information.

Our Genogram does not currently display that information,

but that is something that we may consider

as future enhancements --

incorporating other demographics into our Genogram.

MARY: As far as Indiana is concerned,

there is not anything specifically with ICWA.

We obviously follow all of those guidelines and procedures.

But within GenoPro,

you can put different ethnicities, cultures,

and other things that they might identify with

just in singularly,

but also if you want to use it as an Ecomap,

also that can also be included.

We can put all that information into GenoPro.

SUBEERA: Thank you. I will move on to the next question.

Is the software linked with any person locator tools?

Example: Clear Accurint for easy linking of family members

and demographic information to cases.

MELISSA: In Indiana, GenoPro system is not linked; however,

once you upload the Family Network Diagram into MaGIK,

you will link it to the children --

whoever is actually in that.

So, you would be able to, in theory, once those are uploaded,

have every single person connected

within our overall system of MaGIK.

KEVIN: And in Ohio, our SACWIS application

is not currently linked to a parent locator.

SUBEERA: Thank you. Next question is for Indiana:

When the file is uploaded from GenoPro into your SACWIS,

it's done as a PDF or other file,

and placed into a file cabinet?

Or is the data actually integrated

at the database level?

MARY: So, it's integrated at the database level.

It goes into our computing system, so Casebook.

When it's uploaded into there, it stays within that.

It's not ever a hard copy;

everything is electronically stored within our system.

SUBEERA: Thank you for the answer.

I'll move on to the next question.

Can you get statistics from the Genogram software?

For example, how many parents have been married

at the time of birth?

MELISSA: We do capture that data element elsewhere

in the person record,

but we do not pull it from our Genogram.

We've had that as existing functionality.

LATRECE: Yes, Indiana would be the same on that.

That would be within our database, Casebook,

but not necessarily GenoPro

collecting any additional information.

SUBEERA: Thank you. Next question.

Since the last update was reported in 2011,

how effective is the system for staff?

MARY: So it's an extremely effective tool when utilized.

Even though the information hasn't necessarily been updated,

it still has all of those relationships,

and social and emotional relationships.

And there are, give or take, 20 to 30 different options

as far as different levels of connectiveness emotionally.

You can also put health issues.

There's a myriad of different things

you can put into the GenoPro

through the Family Network Diagram.

So even though it hasn't been updated,

it is still very useful.

SUBEERA: Okay, thank you. The next question is for Ohio.

Did Ohio use any open source software to implement Genogram?

KEVIN: No, it's all JAVA-based

integrated with our existing application.

As I mentioned, we did use to go JS

as part of a toolkit to help with the rendering.

SUBEERA: I do have another question for Ohio

and you may be able to answer this

along with the answer you provided.

Did Ohio develop their Genogram in-house?

KEVIN: Yes, it was custom-built

to integrate with our existing application.

SUBEERA: Thank you.

Candy, do we have any questions in the queue?

CANDY: We're showing no questions at this time.

Again, from the phone, you may press "Star-1."

SUBEERA: Thank you. I will move on to the next question.

What was the biggest challenge of getting workers

to create and fill out a Genogram,

and how did you address it?

MARY: So in Indiana, the biggest challenge

isn't necessarily having them complete a Genogram,

it's just taking that additional step

to actually put everything into GenoPro.

I know that right now within our training process

for our new family case managers,

we want them to utilize that.

So, we're showing it to them within their on-job training,

and then also within our engagement field,

we're trying to pull the Genogram and GenoPro

into that as well.

MELISSA: In Ohio, there is training available

to encourage the use of Genograms

and to help workers understand

how this can have a positive impact on their work.

But it is not something

that is currently required for every case.

That's more of an agency to agency policy.

SUBEERA: Thank you.

I'll move on to the next question, it's for Ohio.

How long did it take to build the functionality in Ohio?

MELISSA: Well, from the point of beginning design sessions

to implementation was about a year.

KEVIN: Again, that incorporated

the person-level relationship conversion,

so there's a lot of time invested in that as well.

SUBEERA: Okay, thank you. I do have a related question.

If a state wanted to obtain Ohio's Genogram code,

is the state willing to share it

on the Federal Repository when it becomes available?

KEVIN: Yes, we are.

SUBEERA: Okay, thank you. I will move on to the next question.

Is data entered into the Genogram software

stored in the database for

the main case management system (MaGIK or SACWIS)?

MELISSA: In Ohio...

MARY: Can you repeat that question?

SUBEERA: Is data entered into the Genogram software

stored in the database for the main case management system?

MARY: Yes, in Indiana it is.

MELISSA: In Ohio, we're actually using the SACWIS data

to create the Genogram.

And users can actually download a PDF of the image,

but unfortunately at this time

they're not able to save a point-in-time rendering

of the Genogram in our system,

but that is something that we hope to change in the future.

SUBEERA: Thank you.

Candy, do we have any questions in the queue?

CANDY: We're currently showing no questions.

SUBEERA: As a reminder, you can type the questions

in the chat box or press "Star-1" to ask a question.

JOYCE: So, this is Joyce and I have a question.

My assumption is that you actually share

the family relationship or Family Network Diagrams

with your families? Is that correct?

MARY: In Indiana, in part, yes.

The actual Family Network Diagram

is something that the family case manager

and the family develop together.

As far as seeing what the finalized

actual picture would look like,

no, but I think all of those conversations

are discussed verbally.

JOYCE: Okay, thank you.

For Indiana, does the state provide GenoPro licensing

and software to CASA or your other service providers?

LATRECE: No, we do not.

SUBEERA: Candy, do we have any questions in the queue?

CANDY: We are showing no questions from the phone.

Again, parties may press "Star-1."

SUBEERA: If you would like to ask a question,

you may type it in the chat box, or press "Star-1."

JOYCE: So, while we are awaiting any additional questions

that may come in,

I would like to circle back to both states and to your teams.

As we have walked through this,

is there any other key information

that you may like to share with states?

Indiana?

LATRECE: I think, as I mentioned earlier,

there's a lot of importance around engagement skills.

It's not really a tool that

you should just go out and start asking intrusive questions

without establishing some rapport first.

It can give us a lot of information

that's helpful at critical junctures

and looking for placement

and discussing those family relationships.

If they're changed,

if relationships get stronger or amended,

we can definitely update the GenoPro

and put that new information in there.

But you have got to take that first step

and build rapport and a trust-based relationship.

Because the information you enter

is obviously only as good as what our families give us.

As we know in working in child welfare,

we often deal with families

that have a lot of conflicted relationships

and difficult relationships,

and may not want to share that information with us right away.

You know -- it also goes to engaging fathers

and how we approach parents and family members

and gathering that information

and help them understand the point of it.

We're not trying to necessarily invade their lives

in every single way.

But that this gives us an opportunity

to help work with them on

placement and permanency for their children.

So, that first step is really critical.

JOYCE: Excellent. Ohio?

KEVIN: The only thing I'd like to add,

I mentioned that we would like to share our code

on the Federal Repository,

but if anybody has a more immediate need,

they can send me an email.

We can work through our process,

but that could happen sooner if need be.

JOYCE: And Kevin, your code is Java-based, right?

KEVIN: Correct.

JOYCE: Okay, thank you. Subeera, do we have any more questions?

SUBEERA: There are no questions in the chat box.

Candy, do we have any questions in the queue?

CANDY: We are showing no questions from the phone.

As a reminder, parties may press "Star 1."

JOYCE: Okay, well, let's move on to the next slide, please.

I certainly want to thank our presentation teams

from both Ohio and Indiana.

That was absolutely excellent,

and I wouldn't be surprised if you get some questions

sent directly to you.

So, thank you so very much.

So, this webinar has been recorded

and will be made available online.

When it is completed and posted,

a message will be sent announcing availability

on the Children's Bureau website.

And as a reminder, you can download the PowerPoint

by clicking on the handouts on the right-hand side

in the little box.

Again, thank you to our state presenters.

As we move forward with this series,

the next confirmed upcoming event is on March 14th,

a discussion of the DSS online resources available to you,

which is basically a demo of the Agile online resources

and the DSS website.

So, I want to extend a sincere thank you

to you all for attending,

and that ends the webinar for today. Goodbye.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét