Thứ Năm, 31 tháng 1, 2019

News on Youtube Feb 1 2019

 Manchester City are set to receive a £10million windfall if Denis Suarez completes a permanent deal to join Arsenal in the summer

 The 25-year-old finally signed for the Gunners on deadline day on loan after protracted negotiations throughout the January transfer window

 He agreed to a new deal with his parent club, Barcelona, to protect his resale value

Arsenal secured a clause that would allow them to buy him outright for £20million at the end of the season

  According to the Manchester Evening News , City will be due a 20% sell-on fee if Suarez joins the Gunners on a permanent basis for that sum, and when the other add ons and fees are collected together that will take the total amount earned on the player to £10million

   The midfielder is a product of the Celta Vigo youth academy, and left the La Liga club to move to Manchester in 2011

 He left the north west of England having made only two senior appearances in the League Cup to join Barcelona in 2013

 Suarez was then loaned out to Sevilla, where he played under Unai Emery, before joining Villarreal in 2015

 Barcelona included a buy-back clause in the agreement to sell him to the Castellon-based club which they triggered a year later to bring him back to the Camp Nou

 After two-and-a-half seasons as a bit-part player for the Catalans he has left to join Arsenal on loan

The Gunners are expected to activate their £20million purchase clause in the summer

Read More Denis Suarez to Arsenal  Despite his various moves across Spain, Barcelona have been paying out for clauses that they signed up to back in 2013 when they signed Suarez from City

 This included an up-front fee to buy the player and an extra £700,000 paid out every time the midfielder made 10 appearances for the first team, up to a total of 100 games

 He has so far played 71 games for Barcelona in all competitions to the tune of £4

9million in extra money for City. Keep up to date with the latest news, features and exclusives from football

london via the free football.london app for iPhone and Android . Available to download from the App Store and Google Play

For more infomation >> Denis Suarez to Arsenal: How much Man City will earn - Duration: 3:18.

-------------------------------------------

One Way To Find Out How Much Sleep You Actually Need (animated) - Duration: 8:38.

Recently I went for a cup of coffee with an old friend.

And an interesting topic about sleep came up. I said that I sleep for almost 9 hours

every single night.

My friend was shocked. He proudly said that he only gets 7 hours of sleep. I told him that

if I don't get enough rest, I feel sub-optimal throughout the day. He agreed that it's important

to get enough sleep and that he would never get less than he currently does. However that

got me thinking; "Could it be that I'm actually sleeping too much?

Maybe he's the one who's sleeping too little?

Or is it possible that we're actually both sleeping enough? You probably already know

that sleep is good for you.

If you don't get enough of it on a daily basis, you face a massive amount of bad consequences.

Ranging from mood swings, memory problems,

poor concentration, weight gain, slow reaction time, feeling tired... The

list goes on and on. The funny thing is that most people are actually sleep deprived and

already possess all these negative qualities.

They just don't know that they come from their lack of sleep. One of the problems in today's

society is that we're purposely getting less sleep than our bodies need.

Usually it's because we have to go to work, or go to school.

And this is bad, as we're sacrificing our health in return.

Because of that, getting enough sleep can be a huge hidden advantage for you.

Imagine having your brain function more efficiently than of those around you.

That's what the right amount of sleep will get you.

Better mood, better focus, ability to think clearly etc.

But getting sufficient sleep for just one night isn't enough.

You need to get enough sleep every single night to reap these benefits. Now you might

be wondering, exactly how much sleep should you be getting. The standard prescription is

7-9 hours, but how do you know where exactly you personally fall in that range? First you

need to understand that you, as an individual, are completely unique. And the amount of sleep

your body requires also depends on many different external factors. That means there isn't an

exact amount of sleep you should be getting, as the amount actually changes from day to

day. Let me explain what I mean. You have probably been ill before.

Did you get your recommended 7-9 hours of sleep during that time? Of course you did,

but you also probably got more than that.

When you're ill, you let your body rest for however long it needs, so you can recover

as soon as possible.

You don't let some arbitrary number dictate how much sleep or rest you need.

You let your body determine that for you. We know that a human body needs more sleep after

physical stress to fully recover. That means that if you're exercising, playing any kind

of sport or in general moving a lot, you need more sleep. We can clearly see that with professional

athletes. Lebron James, a professional basketball player, has reported getting 12 hours of sleep. Roger

Federer, a very successful tennis player, is also getting 11-12 hours. They understand

that sleep is critical for their performance. But does the recommended 7-9 hours apply to them?

Sure it does, but since they're pushing their bodies to their limit, they need more than

that to fully recover. But during their off-season, when these athletes are not training as hard,

they obviously don't require 12 hours of sleep, and they get less than that amount. See where

I'm getting at?

7-9 hours is just a recommendation, not a personal prescription. So how do you find out

how much sleep your body needs?

Sadly it's impossible to know ahead of time.

But there is one way to let your body get its optimal rest.

And that is by waking up naturally without an alarm clock. Yes, you heard that right.

No alarms. I've been sleeping and waking up without an alarm for over a year now and I

have to say that this has improved my sleep exponentially. Let me explain why this works

so well. Being suddenly woken up by noise is not good for you.

It causes high heart rate and high blood pressure.

Also, your adrenaline comes rushing, making you stressed first thing in the morning.

That's not good and you don't want that. There are also 2 other issues that make alarm clocks

horrible. First is: The amount of sleep you need is never exactly the same. If you don't

have any mental or physical stress during the day, your body requires a normal amount

of sleep.

About 7-9 hours. But let's say if you had a stressful day at work, had an intense workout

at the gym and ate a heavy carbohydrate meal a few hours before bed, your body will obviously

require more rest. However your alarm doesn't know that and will wake you up regardless,

resulting in less sleep than your body requires. The second issue with alarms is that: Your sleep

is made out of sleep cycles.

The average sleep cycle is around 90 minutes long and consists of REM and non-REM sleep. REM

sleep is light sleep.

This is where dreams occur and we usually toss and turn a bit. Non-REM sleep is basically

deep sleep and you don't want to be woken up during this period. When you let your body

naturally wake up, you'll be coming right out of REM sleep.

If the alarm rings at this time, you're lucky and you won't feel as sluggish during the day.

However if you're woken up during non-REM, you'll definitely feel like garbage for the

rest of the day, or until you mask your bad sleep with coffee or energy drinks. Your alarm

doesn't know whether you're in REM or non-REM sleep.

It will ring no matter what. So yeah, alarms suck.

One good substitute for a standard alarm is an app you can download on your phone called

Sleep Cycle. It uses your smartphone's microphone to detect your movement which helps determine

which sleep stage you're in.

It will then try to wake you up softly when you are in the lightest possible sleep aka

REM sleep. However just because you're woken up in the REM stage, it still doesn't mean

you got enough sleep. Those are two completely different things. Still, this app is a much

better alternative to a standard alarm and I highly recommend it. Now, I urge you to try

waking up without any kind of alarm for at least one week.

See how it makes you feel. You'll probably find out that you need more sleep than you've

been getting.

This is normal. Sleep is more important to our health than exercise and diet, so you

don't want to sacrifice it for anything. Remember, you're not lazy if you sleep more.

No, it just means your body needs it. Thanks for watching. If you found this video helpful,

press that like button.

Also if you'd like to help support this channel, I've set up a support page where you can buy

me a coffee.

The link is in the description.

Every tiny donation counts as it allows me to keep on making these videos.

Thank you so much for your support and make sure you're subscribed, so you don't miss

out on a chance to become better than yesterday.

For more infomation >> One Way To Find Out How Much Sleep You Actually Need (animated) - Duration: 8:38.

-------------------------------------------

How Much Money Do I Have to Spend On Hearthstone? The Evolution of the Game Economy: How much cost? - Duration: 13:07.

Hello my friends.

My name is Bot Mathematician, and this is Holomancer.

Since the release of Hearthstone, players have been arguing about the cost of the game.

These debates still occur today.

We don't want to teach developers how to sell their free to play game.

We decided to recreate the entire financial situation

and show you the evolution of the economy of the game.

In this video you will learn how many packs are needed

to collect the complete collection of cards, how much gold each player can earn,

and most importantly, is the game becomes more expensive

or less expensive from year to year?

To answer these questions, we conducted a large-scale study.

We tried to determine the most important factors

that have an impact on the cost of the game for each player,

then we did the calculations.

The results surprised us a lot.

We worked very hard on this, and think we did a great job,

so we would be very grateful if you could click the like button,

share this video and subscribe to the channel.

The most important components of the game economy are packs, gold, dust,

and of course, real money.

1 pack contains 5 cards; one card is guaranteed to be rare or better.

The cost of one pack in the store is $ 1 and 50 cents,

if you buy 60 packs for $ 70, then a pack costs $ 1 and 17 cents.

You can buy a pack for 100 gold.

On average, if you disenchant all cards from a pack, you get 100 units of Arcane Dust.

Yes, I know your packs seem to always contain only 40 dust,

but you can't argue with statistics :)

The main goal of the game is to collect as many cards as possible,

and for this you need to buy packs or craft the most necessary cards using dust.

Now let's move on to our research.

For this we must go back to March 11, 2014, the day of the game's release.

At the time of launch, only the Сlassic set was available for purchase.

Let's try to calculate the resources that players

could earn in the game.

For visualization on the chart, let's use the icons of two players.

This is Squire and Tirion.

They are the same skill level and play the same amount of time,

but one of them is a Free 2 play player,

and the second invests regularly into the game,

because his main goal is to obtain the full collection.

The main game resource for all players is gold.

You can get gold by completing daily quests, winning against an opponent in battle mode,

and playing Arena.

Every day, the player received one daily quest.

The reward for finishing this quest was from 40 to 100 gold,

and very rarely, one classic pack.

Quests with a small reward were received more often than quests with a big reward.

For convenience, we first converted all the awards into gold.

On average, in 2014, each player earned 48 gold coins per day.

Also, for three victories in battle mode, a player received 10 gold coins.

Let's imagine that each of our players achieved 6 victories every day.

This means that they earned 20 gold each.

Players also received one-time rewards for completing the training mode, a

nd rewards for completing hidden quests.

Converting it all into gold, we get 1200 gold.

And so, two months after the release, they earned 2,880 gold for quests,

1,200 gold for victories, plus 1,200 for tasks for beginners.

For this amount of resources they could get 53 packs.

Is this enough?

Let's see.

We do not want to bore you with information about the rarity of cards

and the chance of their falling out of the packs.

In order to collect a complete classic set,

it was necessary to purchase approximately 470 packs,

provided that you disenchanted all the extra copies and gold cards,

then craft missing cards from dust.

Thus, Tirion had to pay $ 470 for 420 packs in order to have a complete collection.

In the next 4 months, the first adventure, Curse of Naxxramas, was added to the game.

It is a five-wing adventure, and for completing each wing the player received new cards.

There are a total of 30 collectible cards.

Access to this adventure amounted to 3500 gold.

During this period, Squire bought this adventure for gold

and was able to collect resources for 47 additional packs.

Tirion bought himself this adventure for real money, so he got an exclusive card back

and saved resources for the future.

At the end of 2014, the first expansion, Goblins vs Gnomes, was released.

It brought 123 collectible cards, 20 of which were legendary.

To collect the full collection, it was necessary to buy 310 packs.

Squire was able to buy 82 packs for gold,

and Tirion bought an additional 117 packs for $ 190.

In general, in 2014, players earned resources that are equivalent to about 181 packs,

and the players' expenses for the full collection amounted to 750 dollars.

We understand that this framework is very sketchy,

and it does not take into account a lot of factors.

For example, Arena rewards, additional game bonuses and promotions,

as well as discounts on packs during events.

But in spite of this, we did our best to look at the past as well as we could.

Let's continue, and move on to 2015.

Initially, the developers planned to alternate between adventures and expansions.

Unlike expansions, expansions adventures cost very little gold,

and they give players the opportunity to earn additional resources

before an expensive expansion.

We are convinced that according to the financial results of 2015,

developers had to revise their approach.

In 2015, we got 2 adventures and one expansion.

Not all of them required a large investment of resources from the players.

Additionally, a weekly Tavern Brawl was presented;

The reward was 1 pack of cards for the first win each week.

One card pack per week really has an impact on the economy,

and on top of this, we got rewards for ranks.

If you had a great collection and experience, then you could reach the 5th rank.

Even with only 6 victories per day.

The reward for this achievement is equivalent to about five packs.

In addition, new quests for 50 gold were presented,

although they did not significantly affect the players' income,

since players received them quite rarely.

According to statistics from Reddit in 2015, after the release of new quests,

quests for 60 gold have become less common for players.

At the end of the year, Squire was able to get resources for 209 packs

and two adventures for free.

This is an excellent result.

Tirion spent only $ 200 for the full card collection that year.

The problem is, if you were a new player and you started playing in 2015,

you needed to pay about $ 1138 to collect all cards.

Now for 2016.

This year there were two expansions and one adventure.

To collect all the cards, it was necessary to purchase 640 packs,

and spend 3,500 gold on an adventure.

We also got the division of the game into two formats: Wild and Standard.

Also this year, players were given the opportunity to invite friends to the game,

and new quests were added to battle with friend.

If you battled a friend while you had this quest,

both you and your friend would earn 80 gold,

which significantly influenced the game economy.

After all, it was possible to get benefits from friends.

Without much effort, everyone could receive 3 invitations from friends per month

and earn an additional 240 gold.

Let's look at the results of the year.

Squire was able to earn resources that are equivalent to 339 packs.

Tirion had to pay $ 355 for the full collection.

If you came into the game from the beginning of 2016,

by the end of the year you would need to pay 1,333 dollars

to have all of the available cards from Standard mode.

As you can see, the cost of a complete collection for new players continues to grow

from year to year, even though the division into Wild and Standard modes occurred.

Now let's look at the results of 2017.

According to the original plans of the developers,

we were supposed to get two adventures and one expansion again,

but the sad experiences of the past did not allow it.

The developers came up with something better.

From this moment onwards,

we were told we would receive three expansions per year.

This means that we need to spend more resources,

but there were also many positive things to come about after this decision.

Since the year of Mammoth, we no longer receive copies of legendary cards.

But on the other hand, now the number of legendary cards has changed in new sets

from 20 to 23.

In any case, to collect a full set, you need to purchase about 270 packs.

We also received a large amount of dust for the cards that were sent to the Hall of Fame.

Thus, players were able to collect the amount of resources equivalent to about 426 packs.

However, in order to collect the complete collection,

it was necessary to spend an additional $ 480.

A new player who began to play from the beginning of 2017 needed to spend about $ 1,545.

Well, finally, we will move to 2018.

This year, the developers have maintained their economic course.

There were changes in the quest system.

And we stopped receiving 40 gold quests.

The new ranks were finally created for new players,

and for successfully passing to rank 25, they now receive 25 packs.

But despite these innovations, for a new player,

the game has become even more expensive once again.

According to the results of the year, the players received a quantity of resources

which is equivalent to 418 packs.

This figure is slightly lower than in 2017

because we received much less dust for the cards that were sent to the Hall of Fame.

A complete collection of cards in 2018 costs $ 480.

So finally, we can come to several conclusions.

The first conclusion: Hearthstone is a very expensive card game.

You can play it absolutely free, but you must be stubborn, and use your resources correctly.

Without investing real money, you will hardly be able to collect the entire collection

of cards, but this is not necessary for a successful duels.

The second conclusion: Hearthstone was the most expensive in 2014.

Conclusion three: Hearthstone was the cheapest in 2015.

The fourth conclusion: Hearthstone is becoming more loyal to the players

who have been playing for a long time.

We get more resources,

even more than we give in these statistics, as we have large and small events,

bonus rewards, promotions, and gifts before the release of new expansions

that aren't taken into consideration here.

Conclusion five: Hearthstone is very unfriendly to new players.

Since the launch of the game, for new players, the game has only become more expensive.

This needs to be changed more radically.

New players should receive many more bonuses and many more free packs.

Conclusion six: Developers have experimented with the economic system of the game,

but it seems they have found the perfect solution for themselves.

If you play and you want the entire collection of cards of the current year,

you have to pay $ 480.

Conclusion seven: For all this time, in order to have a complete collection of cards,

it would be necessary to spend $ 2,300.

So the main question that does not leave my head: what awaits us in 2019?

Will we see changes in the economy of the game?

What do you think about this?

We created a Youtube poll.

Find the button on the screen,

please vote and share your opinions in the comments.

In my opinion, this year was not the most financially successful for Hearthstone.

In support of this, by the end of the year,

some players received a link to a large Survey from developers.

In this survey, there were many questions concerning the financial aspects of the game.

You can still vote in the unofficial version of this poll on Google Forms.

For more infomation >> How Much Money Do I Have to Spend On Hearthstone? The Evolution of the Game Economy: How much cost? - Duration: 13:07.

-------------------------------------------

This Girl's Sister PERMANENTLY Catfished Her | How Far Is Tattoo Far? | MTV - Duration: 5:05.

(intense music)

(gasps)

- What the f--- is this, bruh?

What is this?

(intense music)

Why would you do this?

- [Narrator] On this episode of How Far it Tattoo Far?

Sisters, Deaijia

and Anajah

try to teach each other a lesson.

They're very close.

- Are you twins?

- No, we're not twins.

We're ten months apart though.

- Ten months! - Oh my God! Your mother.

Who's older?

- Me.

- You're older?

- Yeah.

- [Narrator] Despite sharing DNA though.

They do not share the same taste in guys.

- So, what kind of guys are you into?

What's the story?

- She likes dirt bags, that's really what she likes.

- Dirt bags? - No, that was my ex.

My ex was a dirtbag, he ate s---.

- I can't stand to see her with like,

a dirt bag, like no,

she's better that that.

My sister's always getting hit up by these

random old men, claiming that they're sugar daddies.

She doesn't know what their true intentions are.

Recently she fell for it and this guy put her account

in the negative,

almost $8,000.

- [Narrator] And surprisingly,

Anajah also has issues with dudes her sister dates.

- She gets ran over all the time too.

She makes stupid decisions.

This girl needs to get it under control.

- No.

- Yes, you do.

- No.

- Yes, you do. She doesn't think before she does anything.

I'm giving my sister this tattoo because,

I really want her to be careful,

she's had a couple of pregnancy scares.

So, I want her to look in the mirror and realize,

I need to be careful.

- [Narrator] Let's get these sisters into the parlor chairs.

It's tattoo time.

(hip hop music)

- My God, I don't know if you're going to like this one.

It's probably one of the craziest ones.

Honestly.

- [Narrator] Okay,

it's time to find out what theses sisters

permanently put on one another.

(mysterious sound)

- Any regrets here?

- Hell no.

- Nope, I guess I don't have any either.

- I feel like I'm going to be pissed.

- This is a wake up call for Deaijah,

she might try to fight me.

But, I'm happy with what I gave her.

- You guys were hard.

- Alright Anajah,

you're up first.

(intense music)

Do no take the shades off.

Deaijah, do you wish maybe,

you would have picked something else,

maybe in a different spot?

- Yeah, I do.

- You do?

- Yeah.

Can't do nothing about it now.

- Oh my God.

(intense music)

- What the f--- is this, bruh?

What is this?

(intense music)

- It's a cat fished tattooed.

- Why would you do this?

- To teach your ass a lesson.

(hip hop music)

- That's f---ed up.

I don't even know, man.

You did not need to go right here, of all places.

- I feel like it needs to be right there,

so you can see that s---.

(cries)

- I'm done.

- Deaijah can you explain the meaning of this tattoo.

- It was supposed to be a half human catfish,

just to represent the sugar daddies that she messes with

and the men that play her.

- I mean I've learned my lesson

and I still think it's f---ed up

that she put it in this spot.

I don't think there's any coming back from this.

I don't think I can ever forgive her for this one.

- Well...

- Oh my God, bruh.

- Alright, we're going to do a switch-a-roo.

(hip hop music)

Good luck, I'm just kidding,

cause I'm scared.

Alright girl, so you know what you did to your sister,

and your tattoo is ten times worse.

- For her sake, I hope it ain't!

- Kevin!

- Hi.

Sorry.

Have fun, be safe.

- Holy s---!

I feel a lot less bad for your tattoo than I did,

30 seconds ago.

(intense music)

- Bruh, really?

You sitting here crying over a man-fish

and you got this s--- on my arm?

Is that a condom?

Am I trippin'?

- It's a condom.

(intense music)

- Bro, you're really going to put a condom on my arm.

That's really, that's bogus as f---,

really?

This is f---ed up.

- It's not even that bad.

- It has veins on it, bruh.

- Oh, there's balls with some hairs right there.

(scoffs)

- She really drew a dick on my arm like,

what the f---?

- [Snooki] Do you want to tell her the meaning of it?

- Pregnancy scares and all that,

I need you to be careful,

I need you to use protection,

I need you to be safe.

- Was it more than one scare?

- Yeah there were a couple.

- I can't discredit that,

it's creative but it's f---ed up.

- I mean, I feel like you both learned a lesson.

You learned to not talk to catfishes.

You learned to use protection.

You're both looking out for each other really.

- What's going to happen when you leave here today?

- Are you guys still sisters?

(hip hop music)

- I f---ing hate you bitch.

(laughs)

- We've done a lot of f---ed s--- to each other,

but I mean,

I learned my lesson from it.

- Me too.

- Love you.

- Give me a hug.

I just didn't think I was going to walk out of here

with a penis on my shoulder, that's all I'm saying.

- Peace!

- Bye!

For more infomation >> This Girl's Sister PERMANENTLY Catfished Her | How Far Is Tattoo Far? | MTV - Duration: 5:05.

-------------------------------------------

Kevin O'Leary: This Is How Much It Costs To Raise A Child - Duration: 1:54.

They're very, very, very expensive.

What about children? Now let's think about

what that means? Of course, it's wonderful to have a family and I endorse the idea

forever. It's wonderful to have children grow up with you. Watch them age. Become

part of a family. It's fantastic. But they're not free. They're very expensive.

You have to pay for their upkeep and you've got to pay for their education.

That's a lot of money. Now you could do it for less. It's not easy. I remember we

had our first child but I couldn't believe was the cost of kids clothing.

What a waste of money. They grow out of out

better strategy. I said this to my wife on the second child, cause we don't have

any money. We had our second kid. I said " Look, we're unlucky. Our first one was a

girl. Our seconds a boy. We can't put the boy in the girls clothing. Start to think

about t-shirts and pants that go for both sexes when they're young. The kids

don't care and that's one way to save money. Figure out what you can buy that's

blue for boys, everybody does that. Pink for girls. What about some other colors

they both like? Everybody wears pants. Everybody wears a t-shirt. Everybody

wears overalls. Everybody has a bib. Go unisex, you don't know what your second

child's sex is gonna be. You want to save money on clothes. They're such a waste of

money. I didn't have that advantage when I started cuz I didn't think about it. So

my son, who came second, ended up wearing a lot of pink stuff

For more infomation >> Kevin O'Leary: This Is How Much It Costs To Raise A Child - Duration: 1:54.

-------------------------------------------

Сколько должна зарабатывать девушка в США, чтобы иметь отношения. Соц опрос - Duration: 8:55.

For more infomation >> Сколько должна зарабатывать девушка в США, чтобы иметь отношения. Соц опрос - Duration: 8:55.

-------------------------------------------

Denis Suarez salary: How much are Arsenal paying Denis Suarez on loan from Barcelona? - Duration: 3:14.

 Denis Suarez had been linked with Arsenal for much of the January window but his loan move has now been confirmed

 He extended his Barcelona contract until June 2021 but the Gunners have an option to make his loan deal permanent this summer

 Arsenal boss Unai Emery, who worked with the player during his spell at Sevilla, said on the club website: "We are very happy that Denis Suarez is joining us

 "He is a player we know well and I have worked with him at Sevilla. "He brings us quality and options in many different attacking positions, so he'll be able to help the team

" Suarez knows what to expect in linking up with Emery again, highlighting the Spaniard's work ethic and attention to detail

 "I have a very good relationship with Unai Emery," Suarez told the Arsenal website

 "I think he's a very demanding coach and one of the best coaches in the world right now - I've been saying that for a while

 "Sevilla was my first year playing football at the elite level - my first year in the top division

I improved a lot as a player thanks to him. He really helped me. "I think he was a big part of the reason I was able to go back to Barcelona after leaving on loan

 "The main thing is that he dedicates a great deal of time to his work. He spends many hours and days watching videos of other teams and his own side

 "His training sessions are really demanding and he ensures that the team is completely prepared

 "But as I say, the biggest thing is the time he dedicates to his work. As we'd say in Spanish, he's 'un enfermo del fútbol' - football mad

"Denis Suarez salary According to Livesportworld.com, Suarez's Barcelona contract is worth €60,000-a-week (£52,000)

 The Spanish giants also confirmed that Arsenal would pay the entirety of the midfielder's wages during his loan spell at the Emirates

 "FC Barcelona and Denis Suarez have reached an agreement for the extension of the player's contract with the club, which ended on 30 June 2020, until 30 June 2021," Barcelona said in a short statement on Wednesday

 "FC Barcelona have also agreed a loan deal for Suarez with Arsenal for the remainder of the 2018/19 season

 "The Premier League club will pay the player's salary during this time and the agreement includes an option to buy

"

For more infomation >> Denis Suarez salary: How much are Arsenal paying Denis Suarez on loan from Barcelona? - Duration: 3:14.

-------------------------------------------

Fantasy Premier League tips: New player prices – How much do Almiron and Suarez cost? - Duration: 3:02.

 The January transfer window is big business for Fantasy Premier League managers with thousands looking to shake up their squads after the deadline

 Bosses are always on the lookout for new FPL differentials while big-money signings always generate heated discussions about player prices

 There are a number of new arrivals worth considering ahead of GW25, including new Arsenal midfielder Denis Suarez

 The Spanish ace has arrived on loan until the end of the season and is expected to be deployed in a similar role to that of Aaron Ramsey and Mesut Ozil at the Emirates

 With the potential for goals and assists, Suarez could be considered a steal at just £6

5million in FPL. Meanwhile, there is even better value to be found at St James' Park after Newcastle shattered their club transfer record for Miguel Almiron

 The Paraguayan will hopefully solve the Magpies' attacking issues and will also be a big boost for those managers owning striker Salomon Rondon

 Priced at just £6m, Almiron could be a huge differential in the second half of the campaign – but how much do other January arrivals cost in FPL? DEF: Chris Mepham (Bournemouth) – £4

5m DEF: Leandro Bacuna (Cardiff City) – £4.5m DEF: Antonio Barreca (Newcastle United) – £4

5m MID: Denis Suarez (Arsenal) – £6.5m MID: Bakary Sako (Crystal Palace) – £4.9m MID: Youri Tielemens (Leicester City) – TBA MID: Miguel Almiron (Newcastle United) – £6

0m MID: Samir Nasri (West Ham United) – £5.5m FWD: Dominic Solanke (Bournemouth) – £4

7m FWD: Peter Crouch (Burnley) – TBA FWD: Gonzalo Higuain (Chelsea) – £9.5m FWD: Karlan Grant (Huddersfield Town) – £5

0m

For more infomation >> Fantasy Premier League tips: New player prices – How much do Almiron and Suarez cost? - Duration: 3:02.

-------------------------------------------

Liverpool's XI vs West Brom in 2016 shows how much has changed under Jurgen Klopp - Duration: 3:06.

 Safe to say Liverpool have come a long way since Jurgen Klopp succeeded Brendan Rodgers as manager back in 2015

 In the German's three full seasons in charge, chronologically the Reds have finished eighth, fourth and fourth in the Premier League

 Liverpool also reached the 2015/16 Europa League final, which they lost 3-1 to Sevilla, and last season's Champions League final with Real Madrid

 Real ran out 3-1 winners in Kiev that day, but Liverpool's run to the final showed that something special was happening at Anfield

 And it's told this season as Klopp's men are currently top of the Premier League after 23 games and once again going strong in Europe

They face Bayern Munich in the last 16.  Klopp has revolutionised Liverpool in his three-and-a-half years as manager and it's mostly due to the players he's signed in that time

 Mohamed Salah, Sadio Mane, Virgil van Dijk, Andy Robertson, Alisson, Fabinho, Georginio Wijnaldum - the list goes on

 Liverpool have had to pay a lot of money to get where they are, but the sale of Philippe Coutinho and reaching the Champions League final last year has put them on the brink of making history

 According to the English media, the Reds are set to become the first club in the world to record annual profits of over €100m (£88

3m).  So how has Klopp done it?  Well, you need only compare Liverpool's starting line-up to face West Brom in May 2016 to their current best starting line-up to see how much change has been made

LIVERPOOL'S STARTING XI VS WEST BROM, 2016  Adam Bogdan; Jon Flanagan, Martin Skrtel, Lucas Leiva, Brad Smith; Kevin Stewart, Joe Allen, Cameron Brannagan; Jordan Ibe, Sheyi Ojo, Christian Benteke LIVERPOOL'S CURRENT BEST STARTING XI, 2019  Alisson; Trent Alexander-Arnold, Virgil van Dijk, Joe Gomez, Andy Robertson; Fabinho, Georginio Wijnaldum; Xherdan Shaqiri, Roberto Firmino, Sadio Mane; Mohamed Salah  The state of that team

Liverpool scraped a 1-1 draw at the Hawthornes that day and it meant they finished a disappointing eighth in the Premier League

 Klopp fielded a stronger XI for the Europa League final with Sevilla three days later and lost 3-1, but with their current team and squad depth they probably would have won

For more infomation >> Liverpool's XI vs West Brom in 2016 shows how much has changed under Jurgen Klopp - Duration: 3:06.

-------------------------------------------

Should we spend less money on WHAT? #TightwadDad Podcast with Neil and Joe 004 - Duration: 3:00.

red red red red red red red So welcome to episode 4 of the TightwadDad

podcast with me, Neil, and Joe.

And we're here in the happy hut and it's freezing, isn't it!

Yeah, it's cold it's pretty cold you've got a cold

I don't like this red I'm surrounded in it You don't like the colour red?

yeah they might think that I love the colour red just because my headphones are red the

covers are red here and the sofas are red I think blues my favorite color

okay which is what you're wearing yes I think it cheers up the Happy Hut, so

I'm sorry if-- I think of it as blood and death

I've got a question but I've left it on the computer so I'm gonna have to - do you wanna

just talk while...

In episode 3, earning money on YouTube how to

so you could try and get a thousand subscribers that's what Dad says yeah

yeah we're on 320 at the moment so we've got another 680 - we've got to do that 2 more

times to get close to a 1000.

I remember, the question I should've asked last time I got it wrong, what should we be

spending less money on?

Food.

food?

We do spend a lot of money on food I think we should buy stuff that would last

longer for cheaper do you think we should eat less?

Wouldn't you be really hungry?

We would, we would.

Yeah.

I'm one very hungry child And I'm one hungry dad as well so that's the

problem, but we should spend less money in the supermarket.

And buy more stuff for less money.

No.

It'd be like like buy as least as possible for at least amount of money so find a better

bread you use a lot of bread.

I do.

You do.

Okay, so if we had less bread and spend the money on other stuff

Dad And then we can eat the same

yeah I just wondered this you kind of obsessed with yellow your hut is kind of yellow

It is.

Your paper that you write on is yellow It is.

And then your bread is yellow I do like yellow.

But I thought you love blue as well Do you know what, the one I like the most

is pink I got pink phone I've got pink trainers

oh yeah pink phone

And I dyed my Choi Kwang Do dobok, I've put it in the washed with the red jacket and it

came out pink Thanks - laughs - thanks for watching you

got this far into the podcast really appreciate it it give us the thumbs up just let us know

you got this far it'd be really helpful And if you have listened to the other podcast

I don't think I should say this on every one but please subscribe

Thanks for watching, see you next time bye Can you please help my daddy get 1000 subscribers

just click on his face thanks bye

For more infomation >> Should we spend less money on WHAT? #TightwadDad Podcast with Neil and Joe 004 - Duration: 3:00.

-------------------------------------------

What's the difference between preserve, conserve, and reserve? - Duration: 8:27.

When I want to spend some time in nature, I often go to my local forest preserves, but

when I'm doing field work, I'm on conservation land.

So when it comes to nature and green spaces, what's the difference between preserve,

conserve, and reserve?

We can start by taking a look at the literal meanings of these words.

To preserve is to "maintain something in its original or existing state."

To conserve is to "protect something - especially an environmentally or culturally important

place or thing - from harm or destruction."

Definitions for "conserve" often include phrasing that implies that the protection

is being done so that limited use can be made of the thing being protected.

To reserve is to "refrain from using or disposing of something; to retain for future

use."

So when used in the context of nature, all 3 terms imply setting aside land to not be

used for much, if any, human uses, with the levels of human use allowed varying with the

format of the individual preserve, reserve, whatever.

It's also probably worth noting that the Wikipedia entry for "Nature Reserve" sort

of treats all 3 terms as interchangeable synonyms, which indicates to me that there's not always

a clear distinction between them.

But it's not just about how we use these words now.

Most of the distinction between these words, especially between preservation and conservation,

was established during the environmental movement in the United States in the early 1900s.

While many people and issues were part of this movement and the ideas that came out

of it, the classic example story is still John Muir versus Gifford Pinchot in the fight

over the damming of the Hetch Hetchy Valley to provide water to San Francisco.

John Muir said that the Hetch Hetchy Valley was beautiful and valuable all on its own, and

that it shouldn't be destroyed for human gains.

He was the face of the preservation movement.

Gifford Pinchot believed in the wise use of natural resources.

He had trained in the forestry schools of Europe, and he became the face of the conservation

movement.

While Muir lost the battle over Hetch Hetchy, his faction did wind up winning many other

large victories.

The idea of wilderness preservation led to the first national parks in the US - stay

tuned for a video on what "wilderness" really means.

And our national parks are great!

But it is worth noting that a large part of the reason they were able to so easily be

set aside as "preserves" was because they were parcels of land that hadn't already

been developed.

I mean, nobody wants to plow fields in Yellowstone!

Aesthetics were another major reason for the parks being protected, even though some of

us may wish that they had been chosen for their contributions to biodiversity or other ecological

significance.

The government would have had a much more difficult time selling the idea of national

parks to the public if they hadn't also been beautiful places for people to hike and drive

through.

All of this really gets to the heart of the issue: these words are value judgements of

nature.

Conservation is about the wise-use of natural resources, and preservation is about the

intrinsic value of nature undeveloped.

Neither is all-right or all-wrong, but the perspectives that each provides are interesting.

When we return to the present-day context of these words, we can see that even more

ideology has gotten wrapped up in them.

Specifically, there can be political motivation behind using conservation versus

preservation.

Studies have shown that "preservation" sounds very restrictive to many people, while

"conservation" tends to sound more appealing, especially to traditionally conservative voters,

because it allows for human use of natural resources.

There's also this idea of preservation as "letting nature take its course," so

not disturbing ANY wildlife, plants, bodies of water, or geologic features, versus conservation,

which is the idea of "managed" or human-affected nature.

However, the whole "nature's balance" thing is kind of a myth, because all systems

in nature are dynamic and go through changes, so in essence preservation might not be possible.

And at this point, we can't really say that there are many (or maybe any) ecosystems left

on Earth that aren't managed by humans.

All ecosystems on our planet have been indirectly affected by humans, and most are also directly

affected in at least one way.

What happens when we choose to rigidly preserve land - i.e. give it the hands-off treatment,

so no or minimal management - but the ecosystem might actually benefit from active management

or disturbance?

I've been thinking about this a lot lately due to my research.

The pine forests of the southeast and the midwestern prairies evolved with fire, but

if those areas aren't actively managed they won't receive that fire disturbance.

Or what if a preserved area received an invasive exotic species?

Would we stand by while the invader pushed native species out of ecological niches,

or would we be okay actively managing the situation?

Regardless of what words we use to describe them, it's more important than ever that

we protect areas of our world that are still home to natural ecosystems.

Wikipedia lists 23 countries that have some sort of established nature reserves, refuges,

and/or national parks.

But The Nature Conservancy estimates that only about 5% of land at high-risk for development

is protected world-wide.

Without these protected places, we will lose our biodiverse species and the systems that

clean and restore our air and water.

We need to set aside protected areas for our own species's survival.

Of those 23 countries, World Atlas has a top-10 list determined by the total percentage of

land cover a country has set aside as protected.

Venezuela is #3, with almost 54% of their land area protected,

and Germany is #4, with almost 48% of their land area protected.

The US doesn't make this top-10 list, with only about 14% of our land area and 12% of

our marine areas protected.

But since these are percentages, we have to keep in mind that the United States is the

3rd biggest country in the world by land area.

That means that even though we've protected a relatively small amount of our own land, the US's protected

lands account for approximately 1/10 of all protected lands on the planet.

Federal protected lands in the United States are managed by the National Park Service,

the U.S. Forest Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and/or the Bureau of Land

Management, plus all of the states and many local municipalities have their own protected

lands as well.

So are protected lands in the US preserved or conserved?

Uhm… yeah.

There's a little bit of everything, and it very much depends on who's in charge,

where the protected area is, and what sorts of resources it includes.

Many of our protected lands still allow for resource extraction, including but not limited

to timber harvest; coal, oil, and other mineral resource mining; livestock grazing, hunting,

and fishing.

They're also often open for recreational activities ranging from hiking to speed boating.

To make it even more confusing, there doesn't seem to be any pattern to the convention of

using the words "conservation" or "preservation" to indicate the kinds of uses permitted in

a particular area.

For instance, in some places you'd be permitted to go hunting in a "preserve," even

though that's not necessarily what the word implies!

If you'd like to explore all of the protected land and marine areas in the United States,

I found a really cool interactive map that you can check out using the link in the description.

You can zoom in to see particular protected areas, then click on them to find out what agency

is in charge of managing them.

What do the words "preservation" and "conservation" signal to you, and which one do you prefer?

Had you heard about the classic Muir-Pinchot debate?

What do you think is the best method for protecting natural areas?

I'd love to hear what you think down in the comments.

If you liked this video, don't forget to like it!

If you didn't like this video, please share it with someone who would.

And if you'd like to support The Roving Naturalist, remember to hit the subscribe

button and the bell notification icon.

You can also follow me on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram.

I'll be presenting at the SXSW EDU conference in Austin in March, so if you'll also be attending,

be sure to come say hi!

Thanks for watching, and I'll see you next time.

For more infomation >> What's the difference between preserve, conserve, and reserve? - Duration: 8:27.

-------------------------------------------

World News - BBC must come clean on how much it pays its biggest stars - Duration: 5:25.

The BBC must abandon a technical 'loophole' which hides the salaries of many of its biggest stars, MPs warned last night

They called on the broadcaster to come clean over how much executives and celebrities paid through its TV production unit or independent television companies receive

At the moment, its annual 'rich list' of highest-paid earners only includes those it pays directly – meaning the stars of hit shows such as Strictly Come Dancing and Casualty can all keep their pay deals secret

And it allows top executives working for production unit BBC Studios to escape public scrutiny over their six-figure salaries

Yesterday, MPs on the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport select committee ordered the BBC to be more transparent and warned bosses that they will keep hauling them in front of the cross-party group to ensure it is tackling the gender pay problem

Conservative Damian Collins, the committee chairman, said they 'do not accept' that long-running programmes such as Question Time should get out of disclosing presenters' salaries because they are made by 'independent production companies'

He added: 'Ultimately it is all licence-fee payers' money, whether salaries are paid directly from the BBC, by BBC Studios or any other production company

' Share this article Share The BBC claims that if it is forced to publish more details, the most sought-after stars and executives will opt to work elsewhere

It also argues that it will make it hard for BBC Studios to compete with its commercial rivals

But the MPs said there is 'no shortage' of companies eager to work with the BBC.The Government previously agreed that the BBC would not have to reveal figures for stars paid through third-party companies when they thrashed out the current BBC Charter

At the time, the BBC argued that disclosing the salary details of its biggest names would make it too easy for rivals to poach them

At the moment, its annual 'rich list' of highest-paid earners only includes those it pays directly – meaning the stars of hit shows such as Strictly Come Dancing and Casualty can all keep their pay deals secretBut the landscape changed dramatically in 2017, when the first round of disclosures exposed the BBC's yawning gender pay gap

Now, critics fear that the loophole allows the BBC to hide huge payments to stars that would never win public backing

They also claim that the BBC will be able to pick and choose which payments to disclose in order to manipulate the number of men versus women appearing on the list of highest-paid earners

The BBC has already said that it will include Fiona Bruce's pay package for Question Time in the next round of disclosures, although the show is made by an independent firm

By doing so, the BBC will be able to boast that it has improved the number of women among its top 20 earners

In the report published today, MPs also savaged the corporation's 'failure' to get to grips with the gender pay problem

The group warned it will keep summoning bosses back to the select committee to see what they are doing to fix it, but said it 'should not take a select committee inquiry for action to be precipitated'

In their scathing report, MPs called on the BBC to set a deadline for resolving the ongoing equal pay claims by staff, and give workers access to more information about how much their colleagues earn

They said the broadcaster should drill down into its official 'pay bands' and publish details of the male-female split for each quartile within each band, 'so women can compare their salaries' to their male colleagues doing equal work

 

For more infomation >> World News - BBC must come clean on how much it pays its biggest stars - Duration: 5:25.

-------------------------------------------

08 | How much? #GuestHouse #TravelingKorea (Eng/Span/Viet Sub.) - Duration: 2:04.

If you come to Korea,

I recommend you to stay in a hanok guest house

which is a Korean traditional style house.

How much is it a day?

It's 30,000 won.

Oh, good!

I decided to stay here.

Now I need to go to a convenience store

to buy some stuff for trip.

How much is one toothbrush?

How much is this?

What about that?

I need to buy this, this and that.

How much are they in all?

How much do you think they are in Korea?

How much are they in all?

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét