Thứ Tư, 30 tháng 1, 2019

News on Youtube Jan 30 2019

Hello all you coin aficionados out there and Welcome to the DC Coin World International Coin Channel.

Today we're going to talk to you about the Famous 1962 D Lincoln Memorial One Cent coin

nowas many of you know in 1959 the United States changed from the wheat Cents

To the Lincoln Memorial Cents so on the back instead of the ears of wheat

This is a 1944 Wheat One Cent coin

You can see the wheat they call it the wheat cent because it has these

stalks or ears of wheat on this side they changed in 1959 to the Lincoln

Memorial and this change not only changed some of the makeup of the coins

so it from a bronze coin which was 95% copper zinc and tin to a coin 95% copper and 5% zinc with no Tin.

When they did that it changed the hue of the coins a little

bit in other words the kind of the coloring of the coins and in 1962 there

are some really famously red cents that collectors just love so those who love

the graded Lincoln those kind of collectors they call them graded

Lincoln's because they will go to either PCGS or NGC and actually get graded

according to what kind of condition they're in and how red they are and

these particular coins have a not quite a bright red but a very very

reddish copper variety that the collectors love in fact in a couple

years ago they went up as high as $4,000 dollars for an MS 67 RD or red so an MS

67 means that it's just a beautiful coin it's in great condition

it'll be essentially not just look unused but unscratched and there are a

number of those varieties out there so in 2016 one of them sold for about four

thousand plus dollars four thousand four hundred if you count the fees that you

have to pay to the auction site they still list them at around two thousand

plus dollars on NGC and PCGS in in terms of some of the values so these could be

very valuable coins what will it look like well it will be bright red it won't

have the wear marks or the scratches of this one and she's this one you can see

some of the reddish on here but it's not a bright red and you can see the wear

marks on here it says In God We Trust at the top Liberty behind Lincoln in 1962 D

here when people start magnifying their Lincoln cents a lot of times they say

well this must be something wrong with this because the L is really touching

the side no that that kind of has always been there I'll show you that 1944 again

the 1944 it you know pretty much touches or comes close to touching there so

these cents get the words get really close to the rim and they sometimes they

kind of touch the rim that will not bring you any real value even if it is

almost touching the rim it's just not offset enough even if it does another

thing about the 1962's is that there's a number of different looks on these where

the nine and the six have different heights and the two is a slightly offset

see how this two kind of goes at an angle here it almost beers to the left

it's like it's tipped over that's pretty standard for these coins and it was

probably something that happened in the minting or stamping process they got it

a little bit offset then there's also some varieties on this 1962 where the D

is a little bit lower and doesn't quite go up up to the 9

and so you might find one with a D that slightly lower than the 9 under the

so if you drew a line straight across the bottom of the 9 there are some

varieties where it doesn't touch that the line would not touch the D another

thing you look at when you look at these Lincoln cents is how finely engraved the

back is so in these ones you can kind of see that there's some bushes here and

you can kind of see the steps but a little bit of we're in the steps you can

see Lincoln Way in the back you can see kind of the scrollwork up here see how

that's girl work right there is kind of worn the steps are kind of worn here

this urn or container here at the bottom of the steps is kind of worn if you get

a good one of these these (Sorry about that shaking) the steps will be perfect lines across

You'll actually be able to see some in the bushes over here you'll be

able to see some of the shrubbery if we look over way over to the right and this

is about as magnified as we're going to get here we see something kind of stuck

over there on the end of the shrubberies and that's an F G so see that there is an F

there and a G that's for Frank Gasparro who engraved the back of this coin. So he was the one who did the obverse or back of Memorial Cent

Remember the Lincoln since 1909 the front had

been the same design by Victor David Brenner and we'll see if we can show you

his initials they are often hard to see on these coins but if we tip it up just

right you'll be able to see that there are some initials right in here boy

that's tough to see isn't it right underneath Lincoln there is a VDP well

I'm not even sure we're going to be able to see it in this one you can

a little bit right there yeah see right at the top of my pen

there was a V a D and a B that stands for Victor David Brenner

and that's his initials on the bottom of Lincoln right underneath his that his

shoulder there you can see right there the VDB so the front was always a

Victor David Brenner Actually the first coin that came out his

initials were very prominent and that's one that is incredibly collectible this

one is not so collectible it doesn't have the bright red it doesn't have any

of the specialty conditions on the steps or anything and it's surely not even

gonna be graded as a fine never mind a MS67 plus red. So that's all we have

today for the DC Coin World International Coin Channel if you're

collecting the 1962 D's it's gonna have to be an incredibly good condition to

have a value even if it is in general it's going to be worth about twenty nine

dollars or thirty dollars not $2,000 or $4,000 dollars but if you are a collector

who looks for the full red graded Lincoln's and that's all you want in

life is to get one of those sometimes you're willing to spend a thousand or

two thousand dollars for one have a great day from the DC Coin World

International Coin Channel

For more infomation >> 1962 D US One Cent - $4,000 United States Penny sold at auction - Duration: 8:15.

-------------------------------------------

ECE Purdue Semiconductor Fundamentals L2.5: Quantum Mechanics - Density of States - Duration: 24:19.

[L2.5 Slide 1] Well now that we're comfortable

with some key concepts of quantum mechanics,

we can talk about a really important topic

for semiconductors.

The topic of this lecture is density of states.

[Slide 2] So let me remind you that we have these valance bands

that is mostly filled.

There's a top of the valence band

and a bottom of the valance band and that is so far down

that we don't have to worry about it.

We have a conduction band that consists of a set of states

that are mostly empty.

There's a bottom of the conduction band

there's a top of the conduction band

that we generally don't need to worry about

because it's so high in energy.

It's going to be important for us to know now

how the states are distributed within these bands.

They're not uniformly distributed within energy.

Now, we know that most of the empty states

in the valence bands,

the holes are near the top of the valance band.

Most of the electrons in the conduction band

are near the bottom of the conduction band.

So we only really need to be worried

about how the states are distributed in energy

near the edges of the band.

That's what our focus will be in this lecture.

[Slide 3] The key quantity that we're going to be discussing

is called the density of states

and it's simply a way to count the number of states

between a certain energy and an energy plus dE.

The number of states in that range is the density of states

times the width of that energy range.

So this density of states

is the quantity that we will see in detail,

we will make use of in detain in the next unit.

We want to learn how to appreciate what it is

and how to calculate it for semiconductors in this lecture.

We're going to take a simple description of energy

versus crystal momentum and these simple descriptions

work near the top of the valence band

and near the bottom of the conduction band,

and that's going to be adequate for most semiconductor work.

[Slide 4] So let's begin by thinking about a large chunk

of semiconductor crystal with a volume omega

with the length Lx in the x direction,

Ly in the y direction, Lz in the z direction.

So this is, let's think of this as a large

but finite volume that we have carved out

of an infinite bulk volume.

Well, there's going to be a finite number of states

because the states come from atoms

and there are a finite number of atoms in this volume.

We want to count the states.

There are different ways of doing this.

They end up all giving you the same answer.

I'm going to take one particular way

that makes a lot of physical sense.

Since this is a piece of a volume from an infinite solid

I'm going to assume that at this end of the solid

and at the other end of the solid

the wave function is the same.

We'll assume periodic boundary conditions

so that everything just repeats itself

throughout all of space in the x direction,

in the y direction, and in the z direction.

[Slide 5] So let's just look in the x direction.

This is x equals 0.

This is x equals Lx, which is, we're going to measure things

in units of the lattice spacing

so capital N is the number of atoms

and a is the lattice spacing.

Well, we know what the solutions to the wave equation are

in this region.

They're these bloch functions.

So periodic part times a wave solution.

So at x equals 0 we have to have the same wave function

at x equals L and we know that the periodic part will be the same

because that repeats itself at every lattice spacing.

So this condition imposing the periodic boundary conditions

leads us to conclude that e to the ikx times Lx

must equal 1

in order to satisfy these periodic boundary conditions.

Well, we know that some integer number of 2 pis,

either the i 2 pi or some integer number of 2 pis

will give us 1.

So, we have to require that kx times Lx

equals an integer number of two pis.

So the integer is one, two, three,

it just keeps repeating itself.

Solving for kx we see that kx is two pi over the length

that we're doing all of our counting of states in

times this integer j.

If we plot that we'll get a set of states.

So whenever we apply boundary conditions to a wave function

we get a set of discrete states.

We now have a set of discrete k states.

The difference is that we're thinking about this,

it's not a particle in a box problem.

This is a very large volume.

These are very finely spaced states.

Now, we're going to ask the question.

In some range dk, how many states are there?

Well, we know that each of the states

are spaced by 2 pi over Lx.

So the number of states in that region

is the width of the region dk

divided by the spacing between states,

then we'll multiply by 2.

Because each state can hold an electron with spin up

or with spin down and this quantity we will say

is the density of states in k-space

times the width of the region in k-space.

So we conclude that the density of states in k-space

is the length that we're doing the counting in

divided by pi.

This is in 1 dimension, okay?

And remember, we always have to remind ourselves

to account for the factor of two for spin

for our electrons.

Now, we can also look at this result a little more closely.

The length is some integer number of lattice constants.

That means I can insert N times a here for Lx

and then I have kx is two pi over a.

The integer j divided by the number of atoms

in this region N, capital N.

Now, as I let j get bigger and bigger,

eventually it will hit N.

When it hits N then the phase of this exponential

has gone from zero to 2 pi.

If I continue to let j increase,

I'm just going around the circle again

and getting another set of results

that are completely equivalent.

So, the unique solution to this equation

are between k equals 0 and k equals 2 pi over a.

That means the maximum k that can occur is 2 pi over a.

This is similar to the Brillouin zone

that we talked about in the previous lecture.

There is a region in k-space of which 2 pi over a

in which the unique solutions are found.

We can shift this region.

Sometimes it's usually convenient to shift it

so that we go from minus pi over a to plus pi over a,

but the width of that region,

over which we have a unique set of answers,

is 2 pi over a.

This is the Brillouin zone.

[Slide 6] Okay, alright so we've gone through the counting in 1D

and we've seen that the density of states in k-space

is two for spin, L over 2 pi.

So the result is L over pi.

If we were to do this in 2D, if we had a 2D material,

a quantum well that we've made

with semiconductor heterostructure or whatever,

the density of states would be two for spin

but now they're spaced L over 2 pi in the x direction

and L over 2 pi in the y direction.

So we get L squared, which is the area,

over 2 pi squared, which is 4 pi squared.

So when we reduce this we get A over 2 pi squared.

In 3 dimensions we have the factor of two for spin.

Now we have states spaced in x, y, and z.

Lx times Ly times Lz is the volume of this material

that we're doing the counting of our states in.

This is 2 pi cubed.

So we get omega over 4 pi cubed.

In 1D the width of the region in k-space is dk.

In 2D it's dkx, dky.

In 3D it's dkx, dky, dkz.

It's a volume in k-space.

Alright, now the important thing to point out

is this applies to any type of band structure,

any type of E of k, it's independent of E of k.

The states are, the density of states in k-space

is the same no matter what the material is.

[Slide 7] Now we will more commonly ask ourselves

a different question.

We will ask ourselves the question

how are the states distributed in energy?

Then it gets a little bit different.

So let's assume we have a parabolic band,

energy is h-bar squared k squared over 2m.

This would be the bottom of the conduction band here.

We've seen that the states are spaced uniformly in k.

At any particular k I have a corresponding energy.

If you simply map these states

to their corresponding energies you can see now

that they are not distributed uniformly in energy.

How they are distributed will depend

on the shape of the E versus k curve.

So what we're going to want to do now

is to figure out how these states are distributed in energy

and find a density of states in energy space.

What we will do is to count the states in k-space,

map them into a corresponding region in energy,

and we will relate

the number of states in this region in k space,

the same number of states have to occur in this region

in energy space, and that will allow us

to define a density of states in energy.

I'm going to write this as D prime of E.

dE is the number of states in that region,

and that's in this region right here.

And that's equal to N(k) dk, the density of states in k-space

times the width of the region in k-space.

That's the number of states in this region of k-space

and they are the same.

So by using this relation we will be able to deduce

from the known density of states in k-space,

the density of states energy space.

So let's do that.

[Slide 8] So first example

we will do it for a 1 dimensional nanowire.

These used to be academic exercises years ago.

Today they're real exercises because we can produce

semiconducting nanowires

and we often need to know what the density of states is.

We'll assume just a single subband.

And recall that there are different subbands.

If we assume a single subband with an energy E sub n,

then the kinetic energy

is associated with the motion in the x direction,

it's h-bar squared kx squared

over 2 times the effective mass.

[Slide 9] Alright, so here's our problem.

Here's our k in one dimension, here's our region dk.

We're going to map the states in that region

because there's corresponding regions in energy space.

Well, we know that the number of states in this region

in k-space, we've worked that out.

It's N of k dk,

is L over pi times the width of that region in k-space.

That has to be the same total number of states

in the energy, in the corresponding energy range.

That's D prime of E dE.

Now, I'm going to drop the prime.

Typically when we talk about density of states

we are interested in the density of states per unit length.

We're not interested in the actual number of states

because it's sort of arbitrary.

If I take double the length

I'll get double the number of states.

So, D, 1D of E,

the density of states that we're going to compute,

is the density of states per unit length.

So I have to divide by L.

The units then are going to be the number of states,

not really a unit, per unit energy, per unit meter

for the length, the units of density of states.

[Slide 10] Alright, so now we are prepared

to calculate the 1D density of states.

This is the number of states in energy space.

This is the number of states in the corresponding k-space.

We have our relation

between the number of states in k-space.

We have our dispersion.

We can put it all together.

This comes from the density of states in k-space.

We can now use the dispersion to compute dE

from this relation.

We can also compute k from the dispersion,

and we can then compute dE in terms of energy,

plug it all into this relation,

and we find the density of states in energy

is one over pi h-bar square root of effective mass

over 2 times the energy

with respect to the bottom of the conduction band.

This applies of course only when the energy

is greater than the bottom of the subband

because there are no states below that.

So this is the density of states

and we can pick the first subband, second subband,

third subband, or whatever.

[Slide 11] Now, I should just point out

we've done the counting over here for plus kx

and we found the number of states

that are in that corresponding energy range.

The band structure is symmetric.

There's an equal number of states over here at minus kx

that map into the same energy range.

So I need to multiply by 2.

And this is my final answer.

This is the density of states, the number of states

between E and E plus dE as a function of energy,

and we've derived the result that we were after.

Remember, we've assumed parabolic bands.

So the answer could be different

if we had a much different band structure.

[Slide 12] So in general we'll have multiple subbands,

we'll have a density of states for each one of those.

Note that the density of states goes to infinity

at the bottom of the subband when E is equal to E sub n.

And we'll have a series of those.

If this is the first quantized level

of the particle-in-a-box type solution,

we'll have a density of states associated with electrons

that are in that subband.

If this is the bottom of the second subband quantized state

then we'll have a density of states

associated with that as well, and on and on.

[Slide 13] Alright, that's 1D.

Let's see if we can do it for 2 dimensional electrons.

We can produce 2 dimensional electrons

by artificial semiconductor structures.

There are also 2 dimensional materials these days

that people are quite interested in.

So, consider a thin semiconducting slab of thickness t.

The electrons are confined in the z direction.

So I'll have particle-in-a-box subbands

associated with that.

The electrons are free to move in the x-y plane

and we would like to count the states

within this area A.

We're going to assume again that the bands are parabolic

so the energy is the bottom of the subband

plus h-bar squared times k in the x-y plane squared

divided by 2 times the effective mass.

[Slide 14] So let's have a look at that.

We're going to approach it the same way.

We'll take the density of states

times the width and energy range.

We'll map that to the corresponding number of states

in the k-space range.

And the way we'll do this is we will assume

a 2 dimensional k-space.

So there is a parabolic band.

So energy is h-bar squared k squared over 2 m,

that's this circle, and we'd like to know

how many states are there between k and k plus dk.

The red ring around here is width dk.

The area of that region

that we're asking to count the states in

is the circumference of the circle, 2 pi k

times the thickness of that little ring, which is dk,

and we're asking how many states are there

in that red area.

Well, each state has an area of 4 pi squared over A,

as we've seen

when we apply the periodic boundary conditions.

And then we multiply by two for spin, okay.

So, when we do this calculation

we have A over 2 pi squared.

We're dividing by A because we're going to compute

the density of states per unit area.

And then we have the volume of k-space, 2 pi dk.

We use our dispersion to compute 2 pi k dK

in terms of energy.

We do a little bit of math and we end up

with this simple expression

for the 2 dimensional density of states.

Note that the 2 dimensional density of states

is proportional to the mass divided by pi h-bar squared.

Of course these states only exist

if we're above the bottom of the subband.

[Slide 15] Okay, so the density of states in 2D then

is quite different from the density of states in 1D.

Let's do 3D, and most of the course

we will be concerned with 3 dimensional semiconductors.

So, we will assume a simple dispersion.

Parabolic bands, the constant energy surfaces are spheres.

We will equate the number of states in the energy range

to the number of states in the corresponding k range.

We now have a volume of k-space, d cubed k.

We have computed the density of states in k-space,

so we know that.

We will equate that, the volume, the volume of k-space

that we're going to do the counting in then

is the surface area of the sphere, 4 pi k squared

times the thickness of a ring around that sphere dk.

So that's the volume of k-space

that we are counting the states in.

Well, now we'll make use of the dispersion

and we will express k squared dk in terms of energy.

When we do that algebra we end up finding

that the density of states is proportional

to the square root of the effective mass

times the effective mass

and it varies as the square root of energy.

So we've calculated the density of states now

for 1 dimensional electrons, 2 dimensional electrons,

and 3 dimensional electrons all under the assumption

that the bands are parabolic.

[Slide 16] Now, things can get a little more complicated.

I'll just mention this;

although, we won't go into the calculation.

Recall that the band structure of silicon

is the bands are parabolic

but they have different curvatures in different directions

and there are six bands at the same energy.

So the constant energy surfaces,

the minima of the conduction bands are located

along a [1 0 0] direction, or these equivalent

[0 1 0] direction, [0 0 1] direction.

There are six of these valleys along these six directions

and they have different effective masses

in the x and the y direction.

So that band structure is a little more complicated.

We've been assuming a simple spherical band

centered at k equals zero.

We could compute the density of states for silicon as well.

It would be a little more complicated calculation

but it's something that you go through

in slightly more advanced courses.

I'll simply give the answer.

You can wrap everything together

and you can make it look like our simple result.

If we express, if we define a quantity

that we will call the density of states effective mass,

this is not a real effective mass.

The real effective masses are related to the curvature

of E versus k.

But this is a definition such that if we use it

in our simple spherical band approximation,

we'll get the correct answers

and the correct densities of states.

So, when we are computing the density of states

in a semiconductor, we have to be careful in this formula

to use the appropriate density of states effective mass.

If it's a simple spherical semiconductor

centered at k equals zero, it's just the effective mass

associated with the curvature of the band.

If it's a more complicated material like silicon

it is a more complicated quantity.

So you should remember that.

[Slide 17] Alright, so some things that we should take away.

This is the expression for the density of states.

It's worth remembering that the density of states varies

as the three halves power of the effective mass.

So if I'm dealing with a semiconductor

that has a light effective mass,

I know it's going to have a small density of states.

It's also worth understanding that it varies

as the square root of energy.

So as I increase in energy I will get more and more states.

So, for example if we look at silicon

it has a much higher density of states effective mass

than gallium arsenide.

We would expect then the density of states of silicon

to be significantly higher than gallium arsenide.

[Slide 18] So just to summarize,

we've derived the density of states in 1D, 2D, and 3D

assuming parabolic bands.

If we plot them we can see that the density of states in 1D

goes as one over the square root of energy

when the electrons get down near the bottom of the subband

the density of states goes to infinity.

In 2D there are states above the bottom of the first subband

and the density of states is independent of energy

above the bottom of that subband.

In 3D the density of states is zero

at the bottom of the conduction band

and then it increases as the square root of energy.

So, these are quantities

that we will make significant use of

in the next unit of this course.

[Slide 19] As an exercise, if you'd like to test yourself

and see if you understand the basic concepts here

compute the density of states for graphene.

Graphene does not have a parabolic band structure.

It is a 2D material but it will have a density of states

that is significantly different

than the 2D density of states for parabolic bands

that we just worked out.

The answer will be something like this.

The density of states will increase linearly with energy

as we go above E equals zero

and as we go below E equals zero.

So you might see if you can derive that result.

If you can do that then you understand the process

of deriving a density of states for any band structure.

[Slide 20] Alright, we've covered a lot of ground

but we've introduced this important quantity

that we're going to need to use again and again

throughout the course.

They quantity is the density of states

and it's one that we're going to frequently use.

The important points to remember

are that the density of states

depends on the dimension of the semiconductor.

We have different density of states in 1D, 2D, and 3D.

The density of states in k-space is constant

and does not depend on band structure

but the density of states in energy space

does depend on band structure and can be quite different

for different band structures.

For 3 dimensional bulk semiconductors

with parabolic bands it's worth remembering

that the density of states is proportional

to the three-halves power of effective mass

and to the square root of the energy

above the bottom of the conduction band.

So, these are some important concepts.

The quantum mechanical background that we've had

helps us understand where these come from.

We will make significant use of them,

especially the 3D density of states

in the next unit. Thank you.

For more infomation >> ECE Purdue Semiconductor Fundamentals L2.5: Quantum Mechanics - Density of States - Duration: 24:19.

-------------------------------------------

R-Truth vs. Rusev - United States Championship Match: SmackDown LIVE, Jan. 29, 2019 - Duration: 2:42.

This is our second United States Championship match tonight.

R-Truth, before the commercial break, knocked off Shinsuke Nakamura,

who this past Sunday, at the Royal Rumble pay-per-view kickoff show had beaten

Rusev for the United States Championship.

>> It's no secret, R-Truth's never been the brightest star in the sky.

But the decision to accept this matchup, it was strange, yeah.

This was during the commercial break.

Rusev nearly put away R-Truth right here.

But a kickout by Truth.

And, Byron, we're living in an age where there's no contractual rematches for

former champions.

So that applies to Shinsuke Nakamura and

now he's got Rusev doing the exact same thing.

>> Yeah, Truth had about 25 seconds to celebrate and

down comes Rusev understandably frustrated and

to your point Corey I think it's just R-Truth's pride getting in the way.

He got called out, he got put on blast by Rusev and he responded in kind,

saying if you wanna go, let's go.

>> Are you done spewing nonsense Saxton?

Because what you should be doing is giving credit to Rusev for

maybe the smartest decision of his career.

Rusev is about to become United States Champion again.

And Truth's gonna go down in the history books as one of the most

ignorant champions of all time.

>> Now listen, you can't make assumptions like that.

Just like you assumed that Shinsuke Nakamura was gonna run through R-Truth

a few minutes ago.

>> Wait a minute.

Truth trying to catch Rusev out of the corners.

>> [APPLAUSE] >> Truth has beaten Rusev.

>> You were saying Corey?

>> [LAUGH] >> Here is your winner.

And still the United States Champion, R-Truth.

>> Now who had the last laugh at the end there.

It looks like R-Truth knew what he was doing all along.

>> No, and Nakamura from behind to the new United States Champion.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

>> After Sunday he just lost the chance to the championship.

>> Are Nakamura and Rusev together?

>> Come on.

I get being frustratedand all but this is ridiculus.

>> R-Truth took advantage of the opportunity and

now it's a two on one attack.

>> [SOUND] >> Kick to Truth.

>> [SOUND]

For more infomation >> R-Truth vs. Rusev - United States Championship Match: SmackDown LIVE, Jan. 29, 2019 - Duration: 2:42.

-------------------------------------------

Bill Nye: Climate Change Will Be 'Far Reaching' On United States | Hardball | MSNBC - Duration: 6:13.

For more infomation >> Bill Nye: Climate Change Will Be 'Far Reaching' On United States | Hardball | MSNBC - Duration: 6:13.

-------------------------------------------

Generational Cold Weather Moving Across Parts Of United States - Duration: 1:38.

For more infomation >> Generational Cold Weather Moving Across Parts Of United States - Duration: 1:38.

-------------------------------------------

Use Custom Review States in the Data Viewer - Duration: 2:13.

In this tutorial you will see how to use custom review states in the Data Viewer.

Data Viewer can be configured with custom data review workflows.

For example a medical monitors can be alerted when critical medical data is entered and ready for review.

Similarly, monitors can be alerted to data that is ready for Source Document Review.

Navigate to the Review page.

The default columns in the Data Viewer are 'Forms with queries', 'Form State', and 'Source Verify'.

During study setup up to 5 additional review workflows can be configured by the Study Designer.

Each review workflow contains 3 review states.

The custom review states appear as additional columns.

In this example, you can see two forms in the AE/CM visit in the Monitor Review column, under All Forms.

Select the cell showing these forms.

And click the Go to RecordListings button.

Note that filters are set to values based on the cell you selected.

In this case, All Sites, AE/CM Visit, and Monitor Review: All Forms.

The forms can be moved to the Reviewed custom review state by selecting the review state

and providing a comment.

Select the Medication Number cell of the first row of the form.

In the Review drop-down list, select Monitor Review: Reviewed.

Type any comment and click Continue.

Click the Review button to see the updated list.

You can see that one form has moved from All Forms to Reviewed.

A review state does not change if the data is edited after a form has been marked as reviewed.

However the filter 'Updated Since review' can be used to highlight forms that have been

edited or entered since a review was last completed.

To learn more, see the documentation on the Oracle Help Center.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét