Thứ Hai, 4 tháng 2, 2019

News on Youtube Feb 4 2019

Arsenal legend Charlie Nicholas (Photo: Sky Sports) The Red Devils dropped their first

points under interim boss Ole Gunnar Solskjaer last week when they were held to a 2-2 draw

by Burnley at Old Trafford last week.

Manchester United are aiming to try and break back into the top four before the season is

out as they look to try and secure qualification for next season's Champions League.

They currently find themselves sixth in the Premier League table as they look to try and

climb the table under Solskjaer.

However, Arsenal legend Nicholas is tipping Leicester to hold Manchester United to a 1-1

draw at the King Power Stadium on Sunday afternoon.

Writing in his column for Sky Sports, Nicholas said: "A first slip-up for Solskjaer, but

being 2-0 down and getting something from it keeps momentum going.

"Martial has re-signed his contract, so there is a feel-good factor there – they

are not losing any games and keeping the group together and they have their points to prove.

"After going behind early at Anfield, Leicester did really well and I feel like I'm waiting

for Puel to get the sack every game.

They responded brilliantly at Anfield, they defended and attacked well, they did not get

enough service to Vardy, but Maddison missed a couple of sitters and they could have easily

won that match.

"So this will be a tough test for United, but I think it will be a draw with Vardy being

a real handful and I'm totally not convinced by United's defence."

Manchester United brought in Solskjaer as their interim boss after having sacked Jose

Mourinho last month.

The Red Devils have not won the Premier League title since Sir Alex Ferguson's final season

in charge back in 2013.

For more infomation >> Charlie Nicholas states his prediction for Leicester v Man United - Duration: 2:10.

-------------------------------------------

What Do You Need To Run For President of the United States? - Duration: 7:38.

Think you got what it takes to run for President of the most powerful nation on earth?

Well, you probably do seeing as that bar has been historically set pretty low at times,

and with 2020 around the corner people around America are even now beginning to consider

their candidacy for the highest office in the land.

But just how does one get into the oval office and a chance to push the biggest, reddest

button in the world?

For starters you're going to need to make sure that you even qualify for the job, and

that means being a natural-born citizen of the United States- with 37,000,000 million

immigrants in the US that's going to knock out a sizable chunk of the competition.

Next you have to be at least 35 years old, which is bad news for Saira Blair of West

Virginia, who at 18 was the youngest person ever elected to state or federal office in

the United States.

Also not qualifying is James Tufts, who was 3 years old in 2012 when he was elected mayor

of the town of Dorset, a town with a population of 22.

Next you'll have to have made sure that you were a resident of the United States for at

least 14 years- so if you were born in the US as a natural citizen but took off to live

abroad, no dice for you.

We suppose the founding fathers thought that it might be dangerous to elect a President

who was heavily influenced by a foreign, potentially hostile, nation.

Be 35 or older, a 14 year resident, and a natural born citizen.

Meet those standards and you are free to declare your candidacy for president at any time,

although once you receive campaign contributions up to, or spend more than $5,000 you must

register with the Federal Election Commission- that's the agency that we in the US trust

to enforce campaign finance law and that helps keep foreign money out of our political system

so that candidates aren't compromised.

Of course it would be easier to simply make elections federally funded to ensure no funny

business, but think about all those poor lobbyists who'd be out of a job.

Next stop on your road to presidency is your state primary and caucuses.

Both help to narrow the pool of candidates from each political party.

A caucus and a primary works much the same way, a group of voters each cast their vote

for a nominee- however caucuses are limited to the parties voters are registered for only,

while some primaries, known as open primaries, allow a voter of any political party to vote

for the nominee they like best- however a voter cannot go to their car, put on a disguise,

and then vote in a second primary for another political party, that would be voter fraud.

Leading up to the primaries or caucuses though you're going to want to be on the road every

single day, you want to make sure your message reaches as many people as possible so you

can drum up as much support as possible.

You're also going to need funds to run campaign ads and finance your election team.

In a common sense system those funds would come from a federal election pool to ensure

candidates weren't compromised by lobbyists and to ensure a true democracy where poor

candidates weren't disadvantaged by richer candidates.

Instead though candidates are free to beg, scrape, borrow, and promise any amount of

favors and influence should they win the White House in exchange for cold, hard cash now.

So you're going to be putting in a lot of footwork as you move from fundraiser to fundraiser

and take meetings with special interest group after special interest group!

Remember to always be flexible with your principles, or just outright discard them!

All the while you're shaking babies and kissing hands- or is it the other way around... you'll

want to make sure your campaign manager finds out asap- you're going to be keeping your

eye on your political party's national convention.

That's the superbowl of party politics, and though a clear frontrunner is typically identified

early on, sometimes the national convention serves to confirm a single nominee.

At each convention- Republican and Democratic- there are a group of delegates which must

be swayed over to your side if you want a chance at your party's nomination.

These delegates are split into two main groups: pledged, or bound delegates are required to

support the candidate that the people gave the most votes to during their party's primaries

and caucuses.

Unpledged, or unbound delegates, or also known as superdelegates, are free to completely

ignore democracy and the people's votes both and simply vote as they see fit.

How do superdelegates fit into a democratic system?

They don't, are an affront to the very idea of democracy, and should be abolished immediately,

but we'll go ahead and tell you anyways:

In 1972 Democratic Senator George McGovern won the overwhelming support of Democratic

voters, but in the national election faced Senator Edmund Muskie who was the favorite

of the Democratic Party establishment.

McGovern however was so beloved by Democrats that he completely trounced Muskie, and thus

won the party nomination- only to go up against President Nixon in the general election and

give the Democrats one of their most humiliating defeats in history.

In the final vote, Democrats won only Massachusetts and the District of Columbia.

Incensed and determined to never suffer such an overwhelming defeat, the leaders of the

Democratic party established a VIP category of delegates who would vote however they saw

fit, completely ignoring the wishes of the voters.

These superdelegates wouldn't even have to be voted into their positions, they would

simply be appointed by senior party leaders and end up making up 30% of the total delegate

count- ensuring some measure of control over who wins the nomination and that democracy

would be in no way served.

Though Republicans also make use of superdelegates, theirs are limited to only three per state

and obliged to vote for their state's popular vote winner.

To have a chance of winning your party's nomination at the national convention, you're going to

want to tow the party line and make sure you please as many delegates as possible.

However if no nominee has their party's majority of delegates going into the convention, this

can result in a brokered or contested convention, where delegates must vote for their candidates-

pledged delegates must vote for the candidate they are pledged to, but after the first round

of voting are free to choose any candidate if their candidate doesn't make it past the

first round.

The two national conventions are pretty much modern Thunderdomes- many men, and sometimes

women, enter, but only one will exit victorious.

Now you're ready for prime time- the general election.

This is the big show, and where every single embarrassing secret, gaff, mistake, and poor-taste

tweet you have ever posted will be put on full public display.

If the national conventions are thunderdomes, the general election is a 1 on 1 no-holds-barred

deathmatch, and at stake is the ultimate prize: presidency of the United States.

But it's not as easy as simply campaigning, talking to people, and spreading your message-

you're going to have to be strategic about your time and money.

That's because both are limited, and because the Presidency is not actually decided by

individual votes, but rather by a process known as the electoral college.

The electoral college is an institution held over from an early compromise made by the

founding fathers.

While most supported a popular vote election, many- most of whom already held some form

of political power- insisted that while they would grudgingly allow the peasants to vote

for each party's presidential nominees, a bunch of 'normals' surely couldn't be

trusted to vote for the actual president- that'd be preposterous!

Thus they believed that only the US Congress should vote for President, in a kinda-sorta-not-really

democratic way.

With a brand new nation already on the verge of collapse and England gleefully waiting

for a chance to strike should it, the founding fathers came to a compromise- the President

would be elected by an electoral college, with each state receiving a number of electors

based on how many members of Congress that state has, and with absolutely no constitutional

obligation to even vote for the person who won their state's popular vote!

US territories on the other hand would pay taxes but mind their own business and receive

no electors, how the founding fathers missed that bit of irony given the cause of their

recent rebellion is beyond us.

So with your money and time running out, you're going to want to prioritize which states you

actually campaign in- aiming for all the states that have the highest number of electors.

States with few electors, or those that polls show are heavily made up of the opposing political

party, are going to be very low priorities for you.

Come election day all your hard work is going to pay off, and the electoral college will

do its job by ignoring the votes cast by the people and deciding for themselves who gets

to be president!

Would you ever run for president?

Is the electoral college and superdelegates truly democratic?

Also, check out our other video Can a US president Go To Jail?

And as always this video don't forget to Like, Share, and Subscribe!

See you next time!

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét