Thứ Sáu, 30 tháng 3, 2018

News on Youtube Mar 30 2018

Copy rights

For more infomation >> 🔴 rangasthalam movie public response | public talk | review | rating | public reaction | ram charan - Duration: 2:13.

-------------------------------------------

Wayne County Public Schools Recruitment Video - Duration: 2:52.

wayne county is a great place to to work to live to play. wayne county is a

Comfortable environment for you to begin your career and also

retire here as well >> Teacher: choose two more questiions

and break it down again.

wayne county schools resources needed at the teacher's disposal especially beginning teachers

>> we have a beginning teacher workroom that is open two days a week

and I love it because as a new teacher I don't have a lot of

money to purchase a lot of items.

I laminate a lot of work and the work room has provided huge opportunity

for me to save a lot of money >> he answered his question

the beginning teacher program is great this support is great

having the mentors right here in school that are established

where I can go to right then if i need something

or if they got an idea they've tried it's been very helpful >> so how are your lesson plans?

>> and there's lots of people here in Wayne County that are

interested in growing beginning teachers >> if the mentor was not

here and there the no way that I could've grown in the

the three years that I've been here >> it's a great place to work

we've got great kids here we've got great schools

here, rigorous academics they want their students to learn

and grow and increase their levels not just at a testing

standpoint but to get them ready for their future >>you remember

in the story the sisters the older sisters went to dad and asked for all new things

if you're teaching as a your passion as something

that you're passionate about then this is the spot because

the kids really need to here >> so I say why Wayne County because

this is the place for you this is the place to raise a family

this is a place that's a good start and we make sure we take

care of our new teachers how do you apply?

go to our website and on the front website page is a

red sign that says jobs and you click on that button and you

fill out the application and we want you to apply for any school

that you see that has an opportunity for you and the

principals will look at the application and they will give

you a call set up an interview and the next thing you'll know

you'll be meeting me face to face and I'll be welcoming you

here to Wayne County public schools >> honestly been when the

greatest experiences of my life I love teaching in wayne county and I

hope that they stay here the rest of my career

For more infomation >> Wayne County Public Schools Recruitment Video - Duration: 2:52.

-------------------------------------------

'Winter Sonata' actress Choi Ji-woo announces surprise wedding with 'non-public figure' - Duration: 0:38.

Now to some celebrity news that caught everyone off guard.

Korean actress Choi Ji-woo, most famous for her role in the 2002 smash-hit drama "Winter

Sonata," announced to the world on Thursday that she had tied the knot.

Dropping the bombshell on the same day by way of a handwritten note posted on her fan

page,... the 42-year-old said it was a private ceremony and her husband is not a public figure.

All we know is that the couple had dated for about a year, and the wedding was held at

an undisclosed venue in Seoul.

For more infomation >> 'Winter Sonata' actress Choi Ji-woo announces surprise wedding with 'non-public figure' - Duration: 0:38.

-------------------------------------------

② 飯坂温泉共同浴場めぐり(Lovely local public baths in Iizaka Onsen) - Duration: 4:34.

For more infomation >> ② 飯坂温泉共同浴場めぐり(Lovely local public baths in Iizaka Onsen) - Duration: 4:34.

-------------------------------------------

Voici comment réduire le risque de péter … même en public! - Duration: 4:18.

For more infomation >> Voici comment réduire le risque de péter … même en public! - Duration: 4:18.

-------------------------------------------

rangasthalam movie review | public response | public talk | rating | public reaction | ram charan - Duration: 2:15.

Copy rights

For more infomation >> rangasthalam movie review | public response | public talk | rating | public reaction | ram charan - Duration: 2:15.

-------------------------------------------

[IN PUBLIC] CLC 씨엘씨 - BLACK DRESS ~ Dance Cover by Bela and Gu - Duration: 6:10.

Hi guys this is Bela! Today I am bringing to you guys a new dance cover and this time I decided to do it in public and I invited my friend Gu Kawashita

(...)

Say hi

Gu: OH, HI! I was here like "oh I'm not gonna speak", but ok, hello!

He also has a very nice channel where he talks about Korea and Kpop, so go subscribe to his channel cuz his content is lit

I can't believe I said lit Gu: Thank you, I love that word

We also filmed another cover of another song for HIS channel, so if you're curious to see which song we filmed make sure to go watch the video after watching this one, so watch both

That's it

Gu: byeeeeeee

Bela: i'm on the wrong side Gu: we're on the wrong sides!!

Gu: F*** you

Bela: I knew you were gonna do this

For more infomation >> [IN PUBLIC] CLC 씨엘씨 - BLACK DRESS ~ Dance Cover by Bela and Gu - Duration: 6:10.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING: After 10 Years The Truth About Barack Obama Goes Finally Public(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 13:14.

BREAKING: After 10 Years The Truth About Barack Obama Goes Finally Public

damaging new text messages surfacing from FBI officials Peter struck and Lisa

page they suggest possible coordination between the Obama White House the CIA

and FBI early in the Trump Russia probe names that appear include White House

chief of staff Denis McDonough CIA chief John Brennan FBI director James Comey

and Senator Harry Reid page and struck apparently attempting to cover their

tracks this text three months before the presidential election make sure you can

lawfully protect what you sign just thinking about Congress FOIA etc you

probably know better than me Andrew McCabe the top FBI official fired by the

Attorney General Jeff Sessions hours before his planned retirement is now

soliciting donations online for his legal-defense fund no word yet on

whether Clinton donors which supported McCain's wife during a run for Virginia

senators state Senate have pitched in as yet well joining me now Chris Farrell

director of investigations and research for Judicial Watch Chris Farrell

welcome to the show again good sir explain to me how the struck page

messages going backwards and forwards brings a present Obama the Obama name

into play go through it for me sure there's clear evidence in their own

language their own text messages explaining how they were communicating

coordinating with White House officials for example there's a there's a Lisa

page text message that we uncovered a few weeks back that says quote POTUS

wants to know everything we're doing that is pretty clear language by anyone

standard we also know that Andy McCabe had meetings on his calendar with Lisa

Monaco who is the Obama White House White House Homeland Security Director

and guess who she used to work for mr. Muller so this is all very cozy and it's

very apparent now with the addition of Brennan who's at least in his last few

hotel television appearances seems somewhat and unhinged

that the there was direct White House involvement in this if not coordination

this is the kind of stuff that would make Richard Nixon blush this is deadly

serious stuff and I'm glad that you're covered it but it should be you know a

ten minute segment I'm not a reader if they had at the head of the news please

forgive me for breaking into this particular segment on this subject but

please go back to John Brennan sure what he said about the present I saw that I

heard it that blew me away I'm astonished that a former director of the

CIA would say that about a sitting president yeah I mean he may be a

political opponent that have all sorts of personal opinions but the man has no

integrity and no dignity he has no business as a former CIA director

sitting there and sort of you know free associating and speculating about what

he thinks might be it's a it's a disservice to the country it's a

disservice to the office of the presidency this guy is humiliating

himself he's turning himself into a cartoon character by making reckless

comments that really denigrate the office and really undermine the public's

faith not just in the presidency in the government generally but in who picked

this guy to be CIA director and this is really reckless conduct now we have the

Utah prosecutor mr. Huber and we have Michael Horowitz I believe they are both

Obama holdovers they are and they are going to be investigating the Obama

administration this is what makes it work in public crazy this is the kind of

nonsense so they try to blow a fast ball past the American public and we're

supposed to just stand there and say oh okay you're doing something I've told on

the show earlier look the inspector general's office is where the truth goes

to die and now you've got an outsider Obama appointee from Utah he may be a

wonderful man I'm not I'm not attacking him personally but he doesn't

necessarily have the biggest heavy-hitter resume in the world and

he's supposed to come in and he's gonna clean up what's been going on and let's

circle back to your opening comment about the level of involvement from the

Obama lighthouse Inn in staging this attack on

the the incoming president this makes Judicial Watch supporters

crazy it makes Lou Dobbs tonight viewers crazy

anybody who's paying attention they're throwing something at the television

right now you see so little of it now Lou is really the point man on this I

mean he's got more out there than anybody else and I'm just trying to

follow in his footsteps here but well I'm really astonished that so little of

this appears not just in the mainstream media but anywhere else

I make speaking engagements around the country I talked to folks who consider

themselves very you know politically aware and motivated whether it's

business leaders civic leaders and others and I lay out the story I just

did for you in greater detail and they're astonished yeah people don't

know that opening line about the White House coordination with this whole Comey

Strock page mccabe it's a conspiracy literally exactly exactly I didn't mean

to interrupt you there but you're right when you use the word conspiracy I'm

nodding my head because sir you are right it is Chris Farrell we do

appreciate you being with us tonight and always thank you thank you sir

yes sir FBI director Christopher Ray the Republican chairman of the Senate

Judiciary Committee Chuck Grassley says tax from October 2016 suggests then FBI

director James Comey chief of staff Jim ryebeck II believe deputy director

Andrew McCabe should recuse himself from the Clinton email case McCain's wife got

more than seven hundred thousand dollars from Democrats including longtime

Clinton ally Terry McAuliffe for a state Senate race FBI lawyer Lisa page writes

right Vicki just called to check in he very much 100 percent believe that Andy

should be recused because of the perception agent Peter struck replies

God later struck rights I assume McAuliffe picked up but that doesn't

make sense he said he was interviewing maybe he's headed into private practice

McKay did not recuse himself until one week before the presidential election

the new concerns about the bureau's impartiality come on the same day new

texts are firmed binding to the senior senators

with oversight the Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz who

first discovered the anti-trump text between demoted FBI agent Peter struck

and reassigned FBI lawyer Lisa Paige said a forensic review recovered records

between December 2016 and May the letter did not fully explain why senators were

told in August the Inspector General had everything only to learn last week that

thousands of records were missing before traveling to Switzerland during an

impromptu discussion with reporters the president tested some media for avoiding

the story as the texts were apparently found the political rhetoric over the

four page memo documenting alleged government surveillance abuse took a new

turn with the house intelligence committees Republican chairman whose

staff drafted the memo traveling overseas the ranking Democrat drafted

his own version and took a swipe at the media who are covering the allegations a

former FBI agent elected to the House as a Republican

said the Democrats national security concerns are overblown I've read the

memo along with several of my colleagues and my estimation having had exposure

and experience with both FISA and title three wiretap that there are no law

enforcement sensitive sources or methods that we would be compromised here in a

letter the Justice Department expressed its own reservations calling any release

of the memo unprecedented and reckless the FBI and Justice Department want a

review before it goes public let us see it first at this point nobody in the

Senate or the White House or the Department of Justice or FBI has seen

this document though the Senators can't read the document the Minority Leader

weighed in today it's this memo on and on and on conspiracy theories with

virtually no fact some Republicans were pressed on the wisdom of releasing the

memo when the public begins to question the integrity of

the Department and the FBI and and conclude in the absence of other

information that somehow politics has taken over rather than the law that's a

very serious matter and we need to get that cleared up one one means or another

House Intelligence Committee would not comment on reports the memo identifies

McCabe Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and Comey Brett Catherine on

Tuesday Republican Senator Ron Johnson made a comment on this show that raised

a lot of eyebrows to me and then the reaction to it and today somewhat

sounded like he changed his tune we have an informant that's talking about a

group they were holding secret meetings off-site there's there's so much smoke

here there's so much suspicion let's stop there a secret society the secret

meetings off side of the Justice Department correct and you have an

informant saying that yes this text message seems to be the comment about

secret society was in jest do you agree that it appears to be it was in jest

it's real possibility saying it's a possibility Kevin what are you hearing

about the dust-up over those two words secret society

well we've confirmed the text message was sent one day after the election and

page rights to struck quote are you even going to give out your calendar seems

kind of depressing maybe it should just be the first meeting of the secret

society Fox News is told this is the only reference in the 384 pages of FBI

texts provided to Congress last week but for some context three weeks later in

December 2016 the five month gap of missing text begins and no one on the

hill knows what they show and whether they back up senator Johnson's

whistleblower who claims senior FBI officials held these off-site meetings

so we'll see when those newly recovered text messages are provided to Congress

according to this letter from the Republican chairman of the Senate

Judiciary Committee Senator Chuck Grassley the text messages released to

Congress last week raised serious questions about the impartiality of

senior FBI leadership during the Clinton email case and whether there was an

effort to dial back the investigation text messages from February 2016 at the

height of the FBI's criminal probe show agent Peter struck an FBI lawyer Lisa

Paige we're worried about the impact their careers and future investment if

they were too aggressive investigating Clinton's use of an unsecured personal

server exclusively for government business and the mishandling of

classified information page rights to struck one more thing she might be our

next president the last thing you need us going in there loaded for bear you

think she's going to remember or care that it was more DOJ than FBI struck

responds agreed I called the bill that struck spas bill pre-snap

and relayed what we discussed he agrees I will email you and redacted same on

Fox this morning another Republican member of the House government oversight

committee went further emphasizing the same FBI crew from the Clinton email

case then oversaw the Russia probe now we know the fix was in and of course I

think the logical thing is if the fix was in on the Clinton investigation and

then these same people top people to FBI started and ran the Trump Russia

investigation might there be some bad things going on there as well and as you

look at these text messages it sure looks like there is just want to offer

some important context here Struck's boss according to former FBI director

James Comey was the one in the bureau who decided to keep senior congressional

leadership in the dark about the existence of the Russia probe and it was

he who ordered not to brief the gang of eight at that time Sandra Catherine what

has been the response to the New York Times story that broke last night well

at the economic forum the President himself responded to the time since said

the allegations he ordered the firing of special counsel robert muller were

incorrect

because New York Times fake stories Fox's reporting has found there was a

meeting with white House Counsel John began and others where President Trump

talked about the idea of firing Muller and asked McGann if he would talk to the

Deputy Attorney General about that issue the source said McGann told the

president really in no uncertain terms that firing Muller would be disastrous

McGann was not ordered to fire a Muller then threatened to quit as reported by

the time Sandra all right Catherine Herridge thank you for your reporting

alikum thank you god bless you and God bless america

you

For more infomation >> BREAKING: After 10 Years The Truth About Barack Obama Goes Finally Public(VIDEO)!!! - Duration: 13:14.

-------------------------------------------

Mueller's Investigation Just Went Up In Flames – Stunning Connection To Hillary Clinton Goes Public - Duration: 12:11.

Mueller's Investigation Just Went Up In Flames – Stunning Connection To Hillary

Clinton Goes Public

In the course of recent days, it's been affirmed that White House Special Counsel

Robert Mueller picked a staff brimming with Democrat agents to research President Donald

Trump's assumed arrangement with Russia in a year ago's race.

Presently, yet another colleague been connected to intense Democrats.

Flexibility Daily announced that it was recently uncovered that Mueller specialist Jeannie

Rhee has to a great degree close ties with the Clintons and the Democrat Party.

She worked for Barack Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder for a long time and has given

over $16,000 to Democrats since 2008.

She additionally spoke to Hillary Clinton amid her scandalous email claim in 2015, as

she attempted to square access to Clinton's private messages and her restroom servers.

Rhee was so near Clinton that she maximized gifts to her in 2015 and 2016.

Over that, Rhee spoke to the Clinton Foundation in the racketeering claim in 2015.

"Rhee joined Mueller's group in June, as per The Washington Post, and furthermore

filled in as an accomplice at WilmerHale," CBS News revealed.

"She had beforehand filled in as agent partner lawyer general in the Justice Department's

Office of Legal Counsel, where she prompted White House authorities and the lawyer general

on issues including criminal strategy and national security, as per a WilmerHale official

statement from 2011.

She likewise filled in as Assistant U.S. lawyer in the U.S. Lawyer's office for the District

of Columbia."

This comes after it was uncovered that one of Mueller's lawyers gone to Hillary Clinton's

race night party in New York City.

The Daily Caller announced that Andrew Weissmann's participation at the gathering is only the

most recent sign indicating the predisposition against Trump that this examination has.

Weissmann has been alluded to by The New York Times as Mueller's "lieutenant" and

"pit bull."

On Tuesday, moderate guard dog bunch Judicial Watch got a January email in which Weissmann

adulated previous Acting Attorney General Sally Yates' insubordination of Trump.

Legal Watch Reported:

"I am so pleased.

Furthermore, in wonder.

Much obliged to you to such an extent.

All my most profound regards," Weissmann wrote to Yates on January 30, instantly after

she trained the DOJ not to protect an official request prohibiting migration from seven countries,

a demonstration that prompted her expulsion by President Trump.

WEISSMANN IS JUST ONE OF MANY DEMOCRATIC DONORS THAT HAVE BEEN HIRED BY MUELLER.

THE LAWYER DONATED A COMBINED $6,600 TO THE PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGNS OF BARACK OBAMA AND

HILLARY CLINTON.

It was likewise uncovered for the current week that previous Mueller examiner Peter

Strzok, a FBI specialist, was dropped from the test after it was uncovered that he had

a solid hostile to Trump predisposition.

While partaking in the examination, Strzok traded various hostile to Trump messages with

his fancy woman Lisa Page, who likewise had some contribution

in the test.

For more infomation >> Mueller's Investigation Just Went Up In Flames – Stunning Connection To Hillary Clinton Goes Public - Duration: 12:11.

-------------------------------------------

BREAKING : After a Decade, the Truth About Barack Obama Goes Public! - Duration: 2:52.

After a Decade, the Truth About Barack Obama Goes Public!

Barack Obama is undoubtedly in full panic mode right now after new documents came out

that expose how he colluded with the FBI and CIA to take Donald Trump down.

Fox News reported that newly released text messages between FBI officials Peter Strzok

and Lisa Page indicate that there was a coordination between high-ranking officials at the Obama

White House, CIA, FBI, Justice Department and former Senate Democratic leadership in

the early phases of the investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign

and Russia.

GOP congressional investigators say that this new information "strongly" suggests collusion

between former President Barack Obama's Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, then-Senate

Democratic Leader Harry Reid, and CIA Director John Brennan.

The investigators added that this directly contradicts Obama administration's public

stance about its hand in the process.

On August 2, 2016, Strzok texted Page, "Make sure you can lawfully protect what you sign.

Just thinking about congress, foia, etc.

You probably know better than me."

The next day, Strzok wrote another text to Page talking about how former FBI Deputy Director

Andrew McCabe was concerned with "information control" related to the initial investigation

into the Trump campaign.

Days later, Strzok again texted Page, "Internal joint cyber cd intel piece for D, scenesetter

for McDonough brief, Trainor [head of FBI cyber division] directed all cyber info be

pulled.

I'd let Bill and Jim hammer it out first, though it would be best for D to have it before

the Wed WH session."

The GOP investigators explained that in these text messages, "D" referred to FBI Director

James Comey, and "McDonough" referred to Chief of Staff Denis McDonough.

"We are not making conclusions.

What we are saying is that the timeline is concerning enough to warrant the appointment

of an independent investigator to look at whether or not the Obama White House was involved

[in the Trump-Russia investigation]," a GOP congressional source said.

The GOP investigators also said that the CIA and FBI are supposed to be "independent

agencies," and noted that "coordination between political actors at the White House

and investigators would be inappropriate," raising questions about the level of involvement

of Obama White House officials.

Clearly, an investigation must be launched into the criminal lengths Obama went to in

the hopes of taking Trump down..

For more infomation >> BREAKING : After a Decade, the Truth About Barack Obama Goes Public! - Duration: 2:52.

-------------------------------------------

After a Decade, the Truth About Barack Obama Goes Public!! - Duration: 2:56.

After a Decade, the Truth About Barack Obama Goes Public!!

Barack Obama is undoubtedly in full panic mode right now after new documents came out

that expose how he colluded with the FBI and CIA to take Donald Trump down.

Fox News reported that newly released text messages between FBI officials Peter Strzok

and Lisa Page indicate that there was a coordination between high-ranking officials at the Obama

White House, CIA, FBI, Justice Department and former Senate Democratic leadership in

the early phases of the investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign

and Russia.

GOP congressional investigators say that this new information "strongly" suggests collusion

between former President Barack Obama's Chief of Staff Denis McDonough, then-Senate

Democratic Leader Harry Reid, and CIA Director John Brennan.

The investigators added that this directly contradicts Obama administration's public

stance about its hand in the process.

On August 2, 2016, Strzok texted Page, "Make sure you can lawfully protect what you sign.

Just thinking about congress, foia, etc.

You probably know better than me."

The next day, Strzok wrote another text to Page talking about how former FBI Deputy Director

Andrew McCabe was concerned with "information control" related to the initial investigation

into the Trump campaign.

Days later, Strzok again texted Page, "Internal joint cyber cd intel piece for D, scenesetter

for McDonough brief, Trainor [head of FBI cyber division] directed all cyber info be

pulled.

I'd let Bill and Jim hammer it out first, though it would be best for D to have it before

the Wed WH session."

The GOP investigators explained that in these text messages, "D" referred to FBI Director

James Comey, and "McDonough" referred to Chief of Staff Denis McDonough.

"We are not making conclusions.

What we are saying is that the timeline is concerning enough to warrant the appointment

of an independent investigator to look at whether or not the Obama White House was involved

[in the Trump-Russia investigation]," a GOP congressional source said.

The GOP investigators also said that the CIA and FBI are supposed to be "independent

agencies," and noted that "coordination between political actors at the White House

and investigators would be inappropriate," raising questions about the level of involvement

of Obama White House officials.

Clearly, an investigation must be launched into the criminal lengths Obama went to in

the hopes of taking Trump down.

what do you think about this?

Please Share this news and Scroll down to comment below and don't forget to subscribe

Top Stories Today.

For more infomation >> After a Decade, the Truth About Barack Obama Goes Public!! - Duration: 2:56.

-------------------------------------------

Dancing In Public | Clintus.tv - Duration: 12:11.

- Good morning. It's our Sunday.

Sierra's in the kitchen making us waffles 'cause that's what

you do on the weekends, huh? - Yep.

- Sierra had a sleepover with one of her teammates last night

so she's gonna eat some breakfast with us and then

I think we're gonna get dressed for the day

and we're gonna go to Starbucks

and get one of the Crystal Ball Frappuccinos.

Excited for that?

- Yeah. - Yep. All right.

Thank you. - It's kinda easy.

- [Tiffany] (laughs) It's kinda easy?

It's like dessert for breakfast.

Little white chocolate chips.

Oh, in comes the strawberries.

- I'd rather have fresh strawberries.

- [Tiffany] Really? - Yeah.

- [Tiffany] Oh! - I don't know.

- [Tiffany] I was trying to be different.

- It's fine.

- [Tiffany] It's like restaurant.

- I think, I don't know.

- [Tiffany] You don't like the juice?

You don't want it to get soggy. - Yeah.

- [Tiffany] Are you so excited? - Yeah.

- [Tiffany] Hopefully they still have 'em.

- Yeah. - [Tiffany] Alright, let's go.

- We went a day too late-- - [Tiffany] And they ran out.

I have no idea. Looks good though.

Alright, give it it a try.

Peachy?

- Yeah. - [Tiffany] Is it good?

- I think I need to stir it around though

'cause all that liquid.

- [Tiffany] So what's your fortune?

- I don't know. (Tiffany laughs)

I think you got to drink it or something and get the ball.

'Cause there's like a ball...

- [Tiffany] So would you get it again?

That's the question.

Even though today's the last day.

Like it?

So our next stop is Home Depot.

I'm wanting one of those big mops and the,

what do you call those? Like mop buckets.

That you see in restaurants, the big yellow ones.

You know what I'm talking about, right?

- Mhmmm, yeah.

- To mop the garage. Is that weird?

- No.

- How else am I supposed to clean it?

- Clean the garage, yeah.

- [Tiffany] Good down to the last drop.

Haha, caught that.

(laughs) Brooms and mops.

- You need to take this off.

- [Tiffany] You called it a dancing mop.

- Yeah, a dancing mop. Like in movies.

- [Tiffany] Like in movies. (laughs)

- Yeah, they dance with the white mop and it's like.

- So as we were walking down this aisle those people who were

in front of us took the last one of those rolly things,

right here, that I was talking about.

Tandem mop bucket.

Last one. Not cool, huh?

- Use the grey one.

- [Tiffany] So they have this grey one.

But it's not quite--

- [Sierra] What you wanted. - [Tiffany] as good.

- It's not as big but it has wheels.

It doesn't have the wringy thing you wanted.

- [Tiffany] Right.

Oh wait. - Wait, here.

- [Tiffany] Oh, but this one doesn't have wheels.

- [Sierra] Well, what do you want? Wheels?

- [Tiffany] (sighs) It's a big area

so I was thinking wheels.

- So like you want it to be like you can just

drag the cart around and go.

- [Tiffany] Yeah. Just like that.

- Flip it around and start dancing with it.

- [Tiffany] That's gonna be you today in the garage. (laughs)

Get some music on.

Alright, so we decided to go, stop Sierra with your gum,

(Sierra and Tiffany laugh)

to Lowe's to see what kind of mop buckets they have.

- Yeah, those people stole the last one.

- I know. I'm like what's the chances of that?

So we'll see what they have.

We found one. The last one at Lowe's.

- Yeah, it has the nice little sign so you don't slip.

And it's got a little wringy thing so you can wring your mop.

- [Tiffany] A wringy thing?

- Yeah, a wringy thing and it's 31 quarts.

- [Tiffany] So sold? - Yeah.

- Back home now and it's lunch time.

We could've eaten while we're out but I had already boughten

stuff to make a pizza.

Been wanting to try this.

I'd seen this advertised and so we're gonna give it a try.

Sierra's gonna make it. - Thin crust.

- Thin crust.

So she's unrolling it.

You're supposed to keep it on that paper

and then bake it on that. Right?

How cute? Cute little pizza for you and I.

- [Sierra] Unroll it, do we need something to spread it though?

- [Tiffany] Probably.

Oh, you should've done a big smiley face or something fun.

- Tell me in the comments below would you choose meat,

like sausage, pepperoni, bacon, or veggies?

I'm kinda like in the middle.

I'd like bell peppers, olives, and sausage.

But I don't like pepperoni that much.

I'd rather have sausage over pepperoni.

Don't worry, you're supposed to keep the paper on there.

- [Tiffany] Yep.

- How long do I cook it for?

- [Tiffany] Ooh, 14 minutes I think.

14 to 18 so yeah, let's start at 14 and check it.

While our pizza's in the oven,

Baby's gonna get the dreaded bath.

You are way overdue, girl. - [Sierra] Yeah, she stank.

- [Tiffany] Yeah, stinky girl. She goes, "I don't like this."

- "Please don't make me take a bath.

"I really don't like it." - [Tiffany] I'm sorry Baby.

It's just one of those things that just has to be done.

- You need one. You should want a bath.

You stink.

She's like, "Not nice, guys. I don't like it.

"It's really cold." - [Tiffany] "I feel wet."

- [Sierra] She doesn't like to be wet at all.

She'll get in the creek though but she doesn't like this and

she doesn't like the pool.

- [Tiffany] She likes to be in control of the water.

- [Sierra] Yeah, exactly. Whereas that she can swim.

In the creek she just walk and splash and then get out.

Whereas that she has to swim and yeah,

she likes to be able to control it, I guess.

- [Tiffany] It's okay, Baby. I know.

- She's like, "I like you giving baths, Mom."

- [Tiffany] It's okay.

- Oh so fresh and so, look at my hands though.

- [Tiffany] Yeah.

- So gross. She sheds a lot.

- [Tiffany] And she doesn't let us brush her.

So just always dealing with that hair, huh?

Shake it off, girl. Get it all off.

- [Sierra] Shake it, shake it, shake it, shake it.

"No, I want to go in the grass." - [Tiffany] No, you can't roll.

- [Sierra] Get you all dirty again.

Her butt ends up shaking in the end.

- [Tiffany] There it is.

It's definitely done on top but I feel like the center is still

kinda doughy so that's why I pulled it out and did my

little trick on the skillet to kind crisp the bottom

and then I think we'll be alright.

Next time I'll try the not thin.

The regular crust.

All better, Baby?

So Sierra wanted to eat our lunch outside,

enjoy the beautiful weather while Baby's drying off.

- [Sierra] Mhmmm. - [Tiffany] Huh?

So we have to keep her tied up or else she'll go roll around in

the grass or the carpet.

- [Sierra] Or go inside. - [Tiffany] Yeah.

- [Sierra] Either one.

- [Tiffany] So she'll chill out here

for a little bit while she dries. How is it?

- Good. - [Tiffany] Good?

- Dough's good, cheese is good. - [Tiffany] Cool.

That pizza was delicious.

- Oh my gosh, so good. The cheese--

- [Tiffany] Everything. That's probably because you made it.

- Everything was so good.

- [Tiffany] So we'll make it again.

- It was like perfectly cooked, too.

Like it was so good. - [Tiffany] It was so good.

- Like I probably could've aten the whole thing.

- [Tiffany] She's like, "I had to share it with my mom

"and I could've ate the whole thing."

She's not quite sure what she's doing here. (laughs)

Alright, ready to mop the garage?

- Yep. - [Tiffany] Yep.

Do you have a method here? You gonna start by...

Is that really how you're doing it?

(laughs) - I don't know.

- [Tiffany] You don't know how to mop?

- No.

- [Tiffany] You gotta put some muscle into it.

- Ew, it's already dirty.

- [Tiffany] Yeah. It's gonna be bad. (laughs)

- What? I'm just like...

- [Tiffany] Oh, wow.

She really doesn't know what she's doing.

- Stop! (laughs)

- [Tiffany] So here's what it kind of looks like.

Not too horrible in here.

But definitely not clean.

Now, this on the other hand, this is where we park our cars.

And the last time that it rained,

when you pull in with the rainy, wet car,

that's what happens. So this one's pretty gross.

There is the after.

My garage smells so good. (chuckles)

And the RV garage.

Better.

You see the shine?

Dirt bike.

Alright, our work is done for the day.

We gave the dog a bath and we cleaned the garages.

So now, time for some sand volleyball.

- Yeah.

- [Tiffany] Baby's here to join us.

Even though we're putting her in the sand,

that probably isn't very smart.

- [Sierra] She's not gonna roll in it.

I don't think so. - [Tiffany] No.

- [Sierra] She'll maybe lay in it but that's just

gonna be on one side. That'll be fine.

- [Tiffany] Baby.

- Baby, you got sand in your mouth. Gross!

- [Tiffany] You just got a bath.

That wasn't very smart of us, huh?

I think she's gonna get another hose down when we get home.

- Ah, dang it.

- [Tiffany] She's loving it though.

Does that feel good?

Babies, does that feel good?

(dog barks in distance)

Oh, there's another doggy over there, huh?

(Baby barks)

(Tiffany and Sierra yell)

- All fluffy though.

- She like, "What're you guys doin'?"

- What do you want me for? Oh, okay.

- Alright, I think that's gonna conclude our girls weekend.

Did you have fun? - Yeah. I had a great weekend.

- Yeah. It was fun.

We're gonna spray down you, Baby.

- 'Cause she got dirt.

- [Tiffany] 'Cause you just got a bath.

- And she got dirt all over her.

- And then you and I are probably gonna go take a shower

'cause that sand it makes you feel gross.

- Yeah.

- But anyways, yeah, fun weekend.

Boys are coming home tonight. We'll probably be in bed.

But yeah, we'll see you-- - Whenever we see you.

- in the next vlog. - Yep.

- Goodnight. Bye. - Bye.

(upbeat music)

For more infomation >> Dancing In Public | Clintus.tv - Duration: 12:11.

-------------------------------------------

Laeticia Hallyday, si proche de Sébastien Farran selon Public - Duration: 1:17.

For more infomation >> Laeticia Hallyday, si proche de Sébastien Farran selon Public - Duration: 1:17.

-------------------------------------------

🔴rangasthalam movie public talk | review | rating | public reaction | ram charan,samantha | sukumar - Duration: 2:35.

Copy rights

For more infomation >> 🔴rangasthalam movie public talk | review | rating | public reaction | ram charan,samantha | sukumar - Duration: 2:35.

-------------------------------------------

Des Moines Public Schools will urge lawmakers to pass gun control measures - Duration: 1:08.

For more infomation >> Des Moines Public Schools will urge lawmakers to pass gun control measures - Duration: 1:08.

-------------------------------------------

Laeticia Hallyday, si proche de Sébastien Farran selon Public - Duration: 1:57.

For more infomation >> Laeticia Hallyday, si proche de Sébastien Farran selon Public - Duration: 1:57.

-------------------------------------------

Public weighs in on Maine school safety bill - Duration: 0:42.

For more infomation >> Public weighs in on Maine school safety bill - Duration: 0:42.

-------------------------------------------

3/29: Latino Public Radio leadership talks restructuring a new deal on State of Mind - Duration: 24:10.

For more infomation >> 3/29: Latino Public Radio leadership talks restructuring a new deal on State of Mind - Duration: 24:10.

-------------------------------------------

House Public Safety and Security Policy and Finance Committee 3/29/18 - Duration: 59:18.

>> CALL PUBLIC SAFETY AND

SECURITY POLICY FINANCE P >> CALL PUBLIC SAFETY AND SECURITY POLICY FINANCE COMMITTEE TO ORDER. START WITH

ROLL CALL.

P >> CALL PUBLIC SAFETY AND SECURITY POLICY FINANCE COMMITTEE TO ORDER. START WITH ROLL CALL.

>> [ROLL CALL]

>>

CHAIR: REPRESENTATIVE DEAN; HAVE YOU HAD A OPPORTUNITY TO

REVIEW THE MINUTES?

>> REPATIVE DEAN; I HAVE NOT

BUT IF YOU GIVE ME A SECOND

I'LL LOOK AT THEM

QUICK. MR. CHAIR; I MAKE A MOTION TO MOVE

THEM.

>> CHAIR: REPRESENTATIVE DEAN

MOVES THE MINUTES FROM

MANCH 28; ALL IN FAVOR

AYE. OPPOSED? THE MINUTES ARE APPROVED.

REPRESENTATIVE HOPPE.

MEMBERS RKS THE CHAIR WILL MOVE HOUSE

FILE 3958 TO LAY OVER FOR

POSSIBLE INCLUSION. THERE IS A

AMENDMENT; THE A1 AMENDMENT.

THE CHAIR WILL MOVE THE

AMENDMENT. REPRESENTATIVE HOPPE; IF YOU CAN INTRODUCE-ALL

THOSE IN FAVOR; AYE. OPPOSED?

THE AMENDMENT HAS BEEN

ADOPTED. REPRESENTATIVE HOPPE; COULD

YOU INTRODUCE YOURSELF AND

START WITH YOUR TESTIMONY.

>> REPRESENTATIVE HOPPE: I'M

JOE

HOPPE STATE REPRESENTATIVE FROM [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] HOUSE

FILE 3958 IS WAS SOMETHING

ENTITLED TO SIMPLIFY THIS WHOLE

PROCEDURE; AND REDUCE THE FEE

FOR PEOPLE THAT ARE-FOR BANKS

LOOKING AT COURT JUDGMENTS

AND WITH THAT; WE CAN

CERTAINLY HAVE OTHER PEOPLE COME AND TALK

ABOUT IT. I KNOW THERE ARE

SOME CONCERNS; MR.

ELWOOD WORKED ON THIS

BILL; HIS LANGUAGE IS WHAT WE PUT IN THE

A1 AMENDMENT TO MAKE IT

AMENABLE TO THE LEGAL AID FOLKS

AND I THINK IT IS STILL A

WORK IN PROGRESS.

>> REPRESENTATIVE CONSIDINE:

THE AMENDMENT WENT FLYING

THROUGH BEFORE WE HAD A CHANCE

TO CHAT ABOUT

THAT. WHO'S AMENDMENT WAS IT?

>> CHAIR: THE AUTHORS

AMENDMENT.

>>

REPRESENTATIVE CONSIDINE: CAN WE ASK THE AUTHOR ABOUT

THAT >> REPRESENTATIVE HOPPE: THE

AMENDMENT WENT FLYING THROUGH;

THAT IS SUBSTANTIALLY MR.

ELWOOD'S AMENDMENT WHICH I

LIKE. I HAD THIS

LEGISLATION BROUGHT TO ME BY SOMEONE IN THE

DISTRICT THAT WORKS FOR A

BANK AND THOUGHT THIS IS A

SIMPLIFICATION OF THE WORK HE

GOES THROUGH ON A DAILY OR

WEEKLY PROCESS; BUT I LIKE TO

CHECK WITH MR. ELWOOD BECAUSE I

VALUE HIS OPINION; I ALSO CHECK

WITH MINNESOTA BANKERS AND

CREDIT UNIONS AND I CAN LET

MR. ELWOOD TALK ABOUT THE

AMENDMENT.

>> RON ELWOOD: LEGAL AID; I

WANT TO THANK

REPRESENTATIVE HOPPE SO MUCH FOR CHECKING WITH

US TO SEE IF

THERE ARE CONCERNS ON THE ISSUE AND BEING

SO OPEN TO OUR SUGGESTIONS.

THE AMENDMENT SIMPLY DOES THIS;

WE WERE CONCERNED THAT IF WE

REDUCED THE RENEWAL

JUDGMENT RATE TO SUCH A LOW LEVEL THAT

IT WOULD CREATE A UNINTENDED

AND PREVERSE INCENTIVE FOR DEBT

BUYERS TO RENEW THE

JUDGMENTS OVER AND OVER AGAIN; AND AS WE

KNOW THE FUTHER YOU GET FROM

THE ARINLINAL CREDITOR THE MORE

PROBLEMS HAPPEN AND SO

WE JUST FELT IF IT IS THE ORIGINAL

CREDITOR THAT MADE SINCE WHICH

IS WHAT THE BANK WAS AND THEN

WE SORT OF BALANCED THE SCALES

THIS WAY AND THAT IS WHAT THE

AMENDMENT DOES.

>> REPRESENTATIVE CONSIDINE:

THANK YOU; MR. CHAIR. DO

THEY NOT JUST ADD THAT ON TO THEIR

FEES WHEN THEY ARE COLLECTING?

>> MR. ELWOOD: IN OUR

EXPERIENCE IF THEY WOULD HAVE

TO RENEW-BY THE TIME THEY GOT

DOWN 10 YEARS IF THEY HAVE TO

RENEW THE JUDGMENT; THE HIGHER

FILING FEE HAS PROVEN TO BE A

DISINCENTIVE RENEWING THOSE

JUDGMENTS BECAUSE BY THAT TIME

THE EVIDENCE IS SO PHLEGMSY IS

UNLIKELY THEY COULD ACTUALLY

PROVE

IT. >> REPRESENTATIVE DEAN:

>>

REPRESENTATIVE UGLEM: THANK YOU; MR. CHAIR. TO MR. ELWOOD

OR REPRESENTATIVE HOPPE; SO I'M

ALL REDUCING THE FEES AND

EVERYTHING ELSE; AND WHAT

HAPPENS WHEN A JUDGMENT IS

ASSIGNED WHEN A ENTITY FOR

INSTANCE LIKE A BUSINESS SELLS

AND A NEW COMPANY TAKES OVER

YOU HAD A JUDGMENT AND SO IF

THE JUDGMENT IS ASSIGNED TO A

FUTURE ENTITY; THEY STILL HAVE TO PAY THE HIGHER RATE NOW; OR

WOULD THEY BE ABLE TO PAY $40?

>> MR. ELWOOD: MR. CHAIR;

REPRESENTATIVE UGLEM; IT

DOES SAY UNLESS IT IS THE

ORIGINAL CREDITOR THEY PAY THE HIGHER.

>> REPRESENTATIVE UGLEM:

THANK YOU: WELL; HAVE YOU CONCERNED

REPRESENTATIVE HOPPE ABOUT

KEEPING EVERYBODY EQUAL ON SOMETHING LIKE THIS?

>> REPRESENTATIVE HOPPE: MR.

CHAIR; REPRESENTATIVE UGLEM; WE

ARE STILL

CONSIDERING EVERYTHING. I DON'T

WANT TO-THIS BILL WILL BE LAID OVER

AND I'LL WILLING TO TALK

ABOUT ANY PARTS OF IT. I DON'T

WANT TO DO SMJ THAT

IS COUNTER PRODUCTIVE AND I THINK WHAT WE

ARE LOOKING FOR HERE IS MORE OR

LESS A SIMPLIFICATION AS

WELL AS LOWERING OF THE FEE BUT I'LL

WILLING TO TALK ABOUT

IT. >> CHAIR: MR. CARLSON.

>> THANK YOU; JOE

CARLSON; LEGAL RESEARCH

GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS IN ST. PAUL; AND

ONE OF THE GROUPS OF LAWYERS I

REPRESENT ARE CREDITOR LAWYERS;

THEY REPRESENT THE CREDITORS IN

THESE SITUATION JZ

FOUND OUT ABOUT THE

AMENDMENT LAST NIGHT WHEN IT WAS POSTED AND JUST

WANTED TO MAKE SURE WE

UNDERSTAND WHAT IS HAPPENING

HERE. I APPRECIATE AND HAVE

WORKED WITH LEGAL AID ON THE

ISSUE OF PURCHASE DEBT AND IN

FACT IN 2013 WE PASSED A

NEW STATUTE TO ADDRESS THE VERY

REAL PROBLEMS THROUGHOUT WITH

PURCHASED DEBT; THEY CALLED IT

[INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] AND PEOPLE

WERE MAKING A PAYMENT AND WE

TOOK A REAL EFFORT AND

REPRESENTATIVE HILSTROM CARRIED

THE BILL TO GET AFTER THAT

PROBLEM. THAT'S NOT WHAT WE

ARE TALKING ABOUT WITH THIS

LEGISLATION HERE.

REPRESENTATIVE

HOPPE'S UNDERLYING BILL WHICH WE

CERTAINLY SUPPORT; WOULD

BRING MINNESOTA INTO LINE WITH OTHER

JURISDICTIONS. WE CAN REALLY

FIND NO OTHER STATE THAT

CHARGES A FULL FILING FEE

SIMPLY TO RENEW A JUDGMENT.

THAT IS $360. ISSUES OF

EVIDENCE OF THE DEBT BEING

OLDER; THAT'S ALL IN THE PAST.

I HAD A JUDGMENT THAT HAS BEEN

DOCKETED FOR UP TO 10 YEARS.

YOU ARE NOT GOING TO RELITIGATE

THAT ISSUE. THE JUDGMENT IS

THERE; IN FACT IF IT IS A FRAUD

YULANT JUDGMENT WE HAVE A STATUTE THAT

PROTECTS THE CONSUMER AND IT IS A GOOD

THING WE HAVE IT; BUT 5408.14 GIVES A

CONSUMER THE OPPORTUNITY TO

CHALLENGE A

FRAUDULENT JUDGMENT. THE STATUTE OF

LIMITATIONS ON THAT IS THREE

YEARS AFTER THE JUDGMENT IS

DOCKETED. WE ARE TALKING ABOUT

A 10 YEAR WINDOW HERE; SO THEY

HAVEN'T CONTESTED AS

FRAUDULENT; THEY HAVEN'T

DISCHARGED IT IN

BANKRUPTCY. LAST YEAR WE FOUND OUT

THAT PEOPLE THAT WANT TO GO ON

DISCHARGE THE JUDGMENTS WERE

CHARGED THE $360. WE FIXED

THAT AND MOVED THAT DOWN TO 5.

WHAT WE ARE TALK ABOUT HERE IS

A VALID JUDGMENT IN PLACE FOR

UP TO 10 YEARS; AND TRYING TO

MAKE A DISTINCTION BETWEEN AN

ASSIGNED DEBT; NOT DEBT BUYER

JUST ANY ASSIGNED DEBT THAT CAN

HAPPEN FOR ANY REASON SO LONG

TAZ IS DONE BY STATUTE WHICH IS

548.13 AND

WE SAY EVERYBODY ELSE YOU PAY $40; BUT IF IT IS

ASSIGNED IN A BUSINESS

TRANSACTION OR OTHERWISE YOU

NOW UNDER THIS AMENDMENT BE

FORCED TO PAY THE $360 JUST TO

PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS AND PEOPLE

DO RENEW THESE DEBTS BUT THEY

DO IT WHEN IT ISN'T DISCHARGED

IN BANK ROPY AND HAVE THE

BELIEF THE

DEBTORS HATHE ABILITY TO PAY. SIMPLY SAYING

IN THAT SITUATION THE DEBTOR

WILLOW RR ANOTHER $360 ON TO

WHAT THEY ALREADY OWE SEEMS TO

BE A

DISCRIMINATION WE SHOULD THINK ABOUT AND I DID EXPRESS

THIS TO REPRESENTATIVE HOPPE

BEFORE THE COMMITTEE. WE ARE

FINE WITH LOWERING THE FEE BUT

TREAT EVERYONE THE SAME;

THAT IS OUR POINT. THANK YOU MR.

CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS. ALSO; IF

THERE WAS A DIFFERENCE IN THE

COURT; IF THE COURT HAD TO DO

ADDITIONAL WORK ON THIS DEBT TO

RENEW THIS JUDGMENT I

UNDERSTAND THAT; THEY DON'T; IT

IS A ELECTRONIC FILING; YOU

CLICK A BUTTON AND IT IS

RENEWED. IT IS THE SAME FOR

EVERYBODY. THANK YOU MR.

CHAIR; HAPPY TO ANSWER

QUESTIONS. >> REPRESENTATIVE HOPPE: THANK YOU MR. CHAIR AND MR. CARLSON.

I HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO GET A

HOLD OF MY CONSTITUENT WHO WORK

FRZ THE BANK. I THINK I WILL

SEE HIM TOMORROW MORNING BUT

FAILING THAT IT WILL BE EARLY

NEXT WEEK. I'LL TALK ABOUT TO

HIM ABOUT THIS AND WILLING TO

WITH MR. CARLSON AND ELWOOD AND

ALL PARTIES INVOLVED AND SEE IF

WE CAN COME UP WITH SOMETHING

THAT CAN BE POSSIBLY INCLUDED.

>> CHAIR:

GREAT. >>

REPRESENTATIVE DEAN: THANK YOU; MR. CHAIR. SO; I'M

LOOKING AT THE FISCAL NOTE AND

WONDERING HOW THERE CAN BE NO

IMPLICATION IF WE ARE GOING

FROM $285 DOWN TO $40 AND I'M

JUST WONDERING IF THIS IS THE

TYPE OF THING THAT IS HARD TO

ACTUALLY MAKE A DETERMINATION

ON AND IT APPEARS THAT COURTS

HAVE SAID THAT THE AMOUNT OF

JUDGMENTS RENEWED AND UNKNOWN

AND CANNOT BE DETERMINED; WHICH

I MEAN; I AM TRYING TO

UNDERSTAND WHY THERE ISN'T A

FISCAL IMPLICATION WITH

THIS. IF MR. [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] CAN

SPEAK TO THE FISCAL NOTE.

>> MR.

CHAIR; REPRESENTATIVE DEAN; I DID HAVE A

CONVERSATION WITH THE COURTS ABOUT THAT THIS

MORNING. I DO HAVE TO SAY

HOWEVER; THE FISCAL NOTES WERE

INADVERTENTLY LEFT OUT OF MY

PACKET TODAY SO DOPT HAVE ONE

IN FRONT OF ME. MY

CONVERSATION WITH THE COURTS

BASICALLY REVOLVEED AROUND THE

FACT THERE WASN'T

AIGATE NUMBER OF THESE AND DON'T THINK THE

AMOUNT OF REVENUE OR

DIFFERENCE IN REVENUE WOULD BE MATERIAL.

>> CHAIR: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS

FROM MEMBERS? ANY PUBLIC

TESTIMONY ON THIS BILL?

REPRESENTATIVE HOPPE; ANY LAST

REMARKS?

>> REPRESENTATIVE HOPPE: THANK

YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.

>> CHAIR: THE BILL IS

LAID OVER FOR POSSIBLE INCLUSION.

PLEASE KEEP WORKING ON IT AND

LET US KNOW OF ANY PROGRESS.

NEXT BILL TODAY WILL BE HOUSE

FILE 3260 WITH

REPRESENTATIVE LOHMER. REPRESENTATIVE LOHMER

YOU WISH TO MAKE THE MOTION FOR

POSSIBLE INCLUSION?

>>

REPRESENTATIVE LOHMER: THANK YOU MR. CHAIR; I MOVE

HOUSE FILE 3260 TO BE LAID OVER

FOR POSSIBLE AMCLUSION.

>> CHAIR: GO AHEAD WITH YOUR

PRESENTATION YOU HAVE

A AMENDMENT?

>> REPRESENTATIVE LOHMER: I

LIKE TO MOVE THE 3260-1

AMENDMENT.

>> CHAIR: THAT AMENDMENT JUST

CHANGES THE EFFECTIVE DATES?

>> REPRESENTATIVE LOHMER:

YES.

>> CHAIR: ALL IN FAVOR OF THE

A1 AMENDMENT; AYE.

? OPPOSED? THE AMENDMENT IS APPROVED GO

AHODE WITH YOUR TESTIMONY.

>>

REPRESENTATIVE LOHMER: THIS IS THE POSITION OF A AUTHORITY

LEGISLATION OF 2018. SO; THE

MINNESOTA COALITION AGAINST

SEXUAL ASSAULT DEVELOPED THIS

LEGISLATION WITH

PROSECUTORS FROM AROUND THE STATE AND

PUBLIC POLICY COMMITTEE.

MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS

ASSOCIATION SUPPORTS THIS

LEGISLATION; AND THIS BILL

CREATES A LOOK BACK PERIOD OF

120 DAYS FOR POSITION OF

AUTHORITY. A PERSON IN A

POSITION OF AUTHORITY OVER A

CHILD UNDER THE AGE OF 18 IS

SOMEONE WHO IS ACTING IN

THE PLACE OF A PARENT AND HAS A

DUTY TO PROTECT THE WELFARE THE

CHILD. SO; HERE TO DISCUSS THE

BILL FURTHER IS; CARE LINE

PALMER WITH MIN COSA AND

SHE CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

TURNING IT OVER TO MY

TESTIFIER.

>> CHAIR: MRS.

PALMER INTRODUCE YOURSELF AND

PROCEED. >> THANK YOU MR. CHAIR

AND MEMBERS AND THANK YOU

REPRESENTATIVE LOHMER FOR

CARRYING THE BILL; WE

APPRECIATE IT. I WANT TO THANK

THE COMMITTEE HEARING SO MANY

SEXUAL ASULT BILLS AND

INDULGEING ME COMING UP TO THE

TABLE TIME AFTER TIME

THIS SESSION; WE APPRECIATE YOUR SUPPORT AND EFFORTS. AS

REPRESENTATIVE LOHMER SAID

ESSENTIALLY WHAT THIS BILL DOES

IS CREATE A 120 DAY LOOK BACK

PERIOD AND THE WAY THIS WOULD

WORK IS CURRENTLY UNDER THE LAW

WE HAVE THERE POSITION OF

AUTHORITY WITHIN OUR CRIMINAL

SEXUAL CONDUCT STATUTE PER

TAINING TEACHERS

COACHES; ANYONE CHARGED WITH THE CARE

TAKING OF A CHILD. WHEN YOU

SEND YOUR CHILD TO SCHOOL; WHEN

YOU SEND TO SPORTS THINGS

LIKE THAT THEY ARE UNDER A

POSITION OF AUTHORITY AND THIS

PARTICULAR PART THE STATUTE

APPLIES TO YOUTH 16 AND 17

YEARS OLD. THE WAY THE

STATUTE IS WRITTEN NOW IS IT SAYS A

APPARENT CHARGES SOMEBODY

ELSE WITH A POSITION OF AUTHORITY SO

WHEN YOU SEND YOUR STUDENT TO

SCHOOL YOU ARE GIVING THE

SCHOOL THAT AUTHORITY. WE ARE

DOING A COUPLE OFTHIS IN

THIS BILL. FIRST OF ALL; WE ARE

ALSO RECOGNIZING SITUATIONS

IN WHICH SOMEBODY MIGHT BE

ASSUMING A POSITION OF

AUTHORITY; SO IT COULD BE

SOMEBODY WHO SAY STOOZ THE

CHILD I'M YOUR TUTOR OR MENTOR

BUT THEY HAVEN'T

RECEIVED THAT EXPRESSED CONTRACT WITH THE

PARENTS TO DO SO. THAT

HAPPENS SOME CASES SO WE ARE ADDING THE

LANGUAGE INTO THE STATUTE. AND

IN REGARD WITH THE LOOK BACK

PERIOD; IF FOR XHMP A TEEPER;

COACH; SOMEBODY IS GROOMING THE

STUDENT OVER THE COURSE OF

THE SCHOOL YEAR WITH THE

ANTICIPATION THE SUMMER HOLIDAY

IS COMING AND ACT UPON

THOSE INTENTION THIS HAS THE

BOOK BACK PERIOD THAT SAYS YOU HAVE

BEEN IN THE ROLE IN THE PAST

120 DAY AND CONSIDER YOU IN A

POSITION OF AUTHORITY AND

AGAIN; THESE SITUATIONS DO

HAPPEN. IT IS SPECIFIC BUT

HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS.

>>

REPRESENTATIVE CONSIDINE: COULD YOU GO MORE INTO THE 120

DAYS S IT JUST BASICALLY

SUMMER VACATION?

>> MRS. PALMER: YEAH; IT IS

REALLY

BASICALLY THE TIMEFRAME WE CAME TO AS AN

AGREEMENT-THE BILL HAS BEEN AROUND FOR A

FEW SESSION JZ SO IT THROUGH A

COUPLE COMMITTEES AND THIS IS

THE TIMEFRAME WE FOUND

EVERYBODY CAN AGREE UPON AND IT

IS A PRETTY GOOD AMOUNT OF

TIME.

>>

REPRESENTATIVE CONSIDINE: THANK YOU; MR. CHAIR.

>> CHAIR: ANY OTHER QUESTIONS

FROM MEMBERS? ANYBODY FROM THE

PUBLIC WISH TO TESTIFY ON

THIS BILL? WITH THAT; I WILL LAY

THE BILL OVER FOR POSSIBLE

INCLUSION. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU MR. CHAIR AND

MEMBERS. .

>> CHAIR:

REPRESENTATIVE HILSTROM. YOU WISH TO MOVE

YOUR BILL FOR POSSIBLE

INCLUSION? >> REPRESENTATIVE HILSTROM: I

DO; MR. CHAIR.

>> CHAIR: PLEASE PROCEED.

>>

REPRESENTATIVE HILSTROM: THIS IS THE ADMINISTRATION BILL

AND SO WITH ME IS THE

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY.

IT REALLY HAS SOME

TECHNICAL CHANGEATIZE IS MAKING TO THE

PREDATORY REGISTRATION AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THEY ARE

GOING TO GET ACCESS TO SO I

WILL ASK THEM TO BRIEFLY GO

THROUGH THE ADDITIONAL PIECES THAT THEY WOULD LIKE THIS

COMMITTEE [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] MADE THROUGH CIVIL LAWS

ALREADY; WE TALKED ABOUT THE

DATA ACCESS. THERE WAS NO

AUDIBLE DESCENT AND SO WITH

THAT I WOULD LIKE TO TURN IT

OVER TO MY TESTIFIER; MR.

CHAIR.

>> CHAIR: PLEASE INTRODUCE

YOURSELF AND PROCEED.

>> MR. CHAIR; MEMBERS; MY NAME

IS KATIE ENGLANDER WITH THE

BUREAU CRIMINAL

APPREHENSION. I WILL WALK THROUGH HOUSE FILE

3578. SECTION 1 AUTHORIZES THE

USE OF THE DRIVERS LICENSE

PHOTOGRAPH TO LOCATE A

INDIVIDUAL REQUIRED TO REGISTER

AS A PREDATORY OFFENDER.

SECTION 2 ADDS A COUPLE

DEFINITIONS USED LATER IN THE

BILL. SECTION 3 REFORM ATS THE

LIST OF OFFENSES THERE AND

ADDS OFFENSES THAT IS THE BASIS FOR

REGISTRATION. SECTION 4;

MODIFYS THE NAME OF A FORM THAT

IS REFERENCED IN STATUTE AND

DIRECTS THAT WHEN A

INDIVIDUAL DOES NOT HAVE A

CORRECTIONS AGENT THEY ARE TO WORK WITH

LOCAL

LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY IN ORDER TO MEET THE REGISTRATION

REQUIREMENTS. SECTION 5; IS

ABOUT-HAS

SEVERAL PROVISIONS; THE FIRST IS REQUIRE COLLECTION

OF DNA SAMPLE AS PART

OF REGISTRATION. THERE IS

A TECHNICAL FIX TO ALLOW THE

BCA TO NOTIFY LAW ENFORCEMENT OF A

INDIVIDUAL'S NEED TO REGISTER

RATHER THAN PROVIDE WITH A

COPY. THERE ARE SEVERAL

CHANGES ABOUT HOW WE CALCULATE

THE AMOUNT OF TIME THAT A

INDIVIDUAL HAS TO RETURN THE

ANNUAL

VERIFICATION FORM. COUNTY NOW IS DONE FROM THE

DATE OF RECEIPT. IT IS

IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE BUREAU TO

KNOW WHEN A INDIVIDUAL RECEIVES

THEIR REGISTRATION

OR VERIFICATION FORM; SO

THE CHANGES ARE TO ACCOUNT FROM THE

TIME ON THE

VERIFICATION FORM ITSELF WHICH IS THE DATE OF

MAILING. THERE IS NEW

AUTHORITY BEGINNING ON LINE

8.6; THAT AUTHORIZES EITHER

CORRECTIONS AGENT OR LAW

ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITY TO

DETERMINE A INDIVIDUALS INCOME

COMPLIANCE WITH THE

REGISTRATION AT ANY TIME AND AT

ANY FREQUENCY. IT ALLOWS LOCAL

LAW ENFORCEMENT TO

DETERMINE COMPLIANCE EVEN

IF THE INDIVIDUAL HAS A

CORRECTION AGENT ASSIGNED. THE LAST PART

OF SECTION 5 TALKS ABOUT

HAVING A YEAR FOR US TO COLLECT THE

DNA SAMPLE FOR THOSE WHO HAVE

NOT PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED ONE.

SECTION 6; IS WHERE WE TALK

ABOUT THE ADDITIONAL ITEMS OF

DATA THAT WE WOULD LIKE TO

COLLECT ON INDIVIDUALS.

THERE IS ONE CHANGE TO EXISTING LAW;

WHICH IS RIGHT NOW A 2NDARY

ADDRESS FOR EXAMPLE; A CABIN;

IT IS LIMITED TO THOSE LOCATED

WITHIN MINNESOTA; THE CHANGE

EXPANDS TO INCLUDE THE SAECDARY

ADDRESS NO MATTER WHERE IT IS

LOCATED; SO WISCONSIN;

DAKOTA; IOWA; WOULD COUNT AS WELL.

SECTION 7; GIVES AUTHORITY TO

USE ALTERNATIVES TO SOMEONE

SIGNING A DOCUMENT INCLUDING A

ELECTRONIC FORMAT. SECTION 8

IS ABOUT SOMETHING CALLED;

INTERNATIONAL MEGAN'S LAW WHICH

IS FEDERAL REQUIREMENT FOR

INDIVIDUALS REQUIRED TO

REGISTER TO HAVE NOTIFY THE

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THEIR

TRAVEL PLANS OUTSIDE OF THE

COUNTRY IN A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF

TIME. THIS

INFORMATION IS FORWARDED TO THE FEDERAL

GOVERNMENT WHO GIVES THE

DESTINATION COUNTRY THE

OPPORTUNITY TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THEY ARE GOING

TO ALLOW THAT INDIVIDUAL TO

ENTER ON ARRIVAL. SECTION 9;

MODIFYS PENALTY LANGUAGE BASED ON A ROONT MINNESOTA SUPREME

COURT DECISION. SECTION 10;

TALKS ABOUT THE FACT THAT

FAILURE TO REGISTER WILL NOW

INCLUDE NOT COMPLY WG THE NEW

INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL REQUIREMENTS; IT ALSO ADDS

LANGUAGE THAT SAYS IF A

INDIVIDUAL IS NOT IN

COMPLIANCE AT THE END OF THE

REGISTRATION PERIOD THEIR PERIOD OF TIME

THEY ARE REQUIRE TODAY REGISTER

WILL BE EXTENDED FOR TWO

YEARS TO GIVE US THE OPPORTUNITY TO

UMXH INTO COMPLIANCE. SECTIONS

11 AND 13; ARE DAT A SHARING

PROVISIONS TO MATCH LANGUAGE

PASSED SEVERAL YEARS AGO

AUTHORIZING PROBATION AGENTS TO

SHARE INFORMATION WITH CHILD

PROTECTION. THIS

JUST CLEANS THINGS UP TO MAKE SURE THE

SHARING IS ACTUALLY

AUTHORIZED. SECTION 12; CLARIFIES THAT

WHEN A PERSON DOES NOT RETURN A

VERIFICATION FORM OR

HAS [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] THAT THE

BUREAU MAY MAKE INFORMATION

ABOUT THE INDIVIDUAL AVAILABLE

TO THE PUBLIC BECAUSE THEY ARE

OUT OF COMPLIANCE. WITH THAT;

I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS.

>> CHAIR: ANY QUESTIONS FROM

THE MEMBERS?

>>

REPRESENTATIVE [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] NOT A

QUESTION; BUT RATHER THANK YOU. I DID

PREDITARY OFFEND

TRACKING AND THERE ARE A LOT OF TIMES

YOU ARE LOOKING AT IT AND GOING IF

THIS IS ALL WE ARE TRACKING

WITH; THINGS NEED TO BE

TIGHTENED UP SO I APPRECIATE

WHAT REPRESENTATIVE HILSTROM IS

PUTTING FORWARD HERE.

>> CHAIR: ANY OTHER QUESTION

FROM THE MEMBERS?

>> REPRESENTATIVE

BECKER FINN: THANK YOU; MR. CHAIR AND I

ALSO WANTED TO THANK YOU FOR

BRINGING THIS FORWARD. I KNOW

IN RECENTLY IN MINNESOTA THERE

ARE A COUPLE CASES WHERE WE

HAD-I DON'T KNOW IF THEY WERE

PREVIOUSLY OFFENDERS BUT HAD

CASES WHERE PEOPLE KIDNAP

CHILDREN AND TAKE THEM TO

CABINS AND SECOND HOMES

AND THINK THAT WILL BE REALLY

HELPFUL IN KEEPING TRACK OF

WHERE FOLKS ARE AND WHEN WE DO

HAVE INCIDENTS TRYING TO FIGURE

OUT IF THERE IS A REOFFENSE WE

HAVE

THAT INFORMATION READILY AVAILABLE SO THANK YOU.

>>

REPRESENTATIVE HILSTROM: THERE IS A A1 AMENDMENT AND

THIS IS AT THE REQUEST OF

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION JZ

THEY ARE HERE TO

SPEAK TO THAT IF YOU WOULD LIKE THEM TO SPEAK

TO THE A1 AMENDMENT.

>> CHAIR: IF THEY ARE

WILLING-I SEE COMMISSIONER

ROY HERE. GOOD MORNING. PLEASE

INTRODUCE YOURSELF AND

BEGIN. >> TOM ROY: COMMISSIONER OF

CORRECTIONS. REFERENCES PAGE

11 AFTER LINE 5 WE HAVE SOME

CONCERNS ABOUT

THE TRAVEL LANGUAGE AND SOME OF OUR FOLKS

VOICED A CONCERN THAT THIS

MIGHT LEAD THOSE FOLKS WHO ARE

ON SUPERVISION TO BELIEVE THAT

THEY CAN TRAVEL AND WE WOULD

OFFER LANGUAGE THAT WOULD

SPEAK TO THAT; BECAUSE WE FEEL THAT

EXPECTATION IS NOT REASONABLE.

THERE ARE PEOPLE UNDER

SUPERVISION WHO SHOULD NOT

TRAVEL; AND I CAN THINK OF A

CASE I HAD AS PROHIBITION

OFFICER A GENTLEMEN WANTED TO

RESPOND A WEEK IN THE BAHAMAS

AND HAD A NO DRINK CLAUSE AND

ALSO OWED

RESTITUTION AND MY COMMENT TO HIM WAS IT WOULD BE

DIFFICULT TO MONITOR THE

DRINKING AND BEFORE YOU SPEND

MONEY ON A BAHAMAS TRIP YOU

SHOULD PAY YOUR RESTITUTION.

WE ALSO LOSE JURISDICTION WHEN

THEY

TRAVEL INTERNATIONALLY. WE DON'T HAVE TREATEES WITH A

NUMBER OF COUNTRIES SO THINK IT

WOULD BE INCUMBENT TO HAVE THE

LANGUAGE THAT I CAN NOW READ

INSERTED AFTER LINE 5; PAGE 11;

1.3; A PERSON REQUIRED TO

REGISTER UNDER THIS SECTION WHO

IS ASSIGNED A CORRECTION AGENTS

MUST RECEIVE THE

CORRECTIONS AGENTS APPROVAL FOR ALL TRAVEL;

NOTHING IN THE SUBDIVISION

REQUIRES A CORRECTIONS AGENT TO

APPROVE OF TRAVEL THAT IS

INCONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS OF

THE OFFENDERS SUPERVISION. I

THINK IT JUST MAKES SENSE.

>> REPRESENTATIVE HILSTROM: THANK YOU; MR. CHAIR. THIS WAS

A DEPARTMENT BILL AND

DIFFERENT DEPARTMENT AMENDMENT AND I HAVE

NO ISSUE ADDING THAT.

>> CHAIR: ANY QUESTIONS ON THE

AMENDMENT? ALL THOSE IN

FAVOR- >>

REPRESENTATIVE [INAUDIBLE COMMENTS] I HAD THOSE

CONVERSATIONS AS WELL AS A

DEPUTY WHEN THEY START TALK BTH

TRAVEL AND TELL THEM NO; YOU

TALK TO YOUR AGENT FIRST

OTHERWISE WE WILL BE

TRACKING YOU DOWN AND YOU WILL BE IN

VIOLATION. I SUPPORT IT AS

WELL.

>> CHAIR: ALL IN FAVOR OF THE

A1; AYE. OPPOSED? THANK

YOU. MOTION IS-THE AMENDMENT IS

APPROVED. >>

REPRESENTATIVE HILSTROM: NOTHING ELSE.

>> CHAIR: NO OTHER

TESTIFIERS? ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM THE

COMMITTEE? ANY TESTIFIERS FROM

THE PUBLIC THAT WISH

TO TESTIFY? THE BILL WILL BE

LAID OVER FOR POSSIBLE INCLUSION.

>> REPRESENTATIVE

HILSTROM: THANK YOU; MEMBERS.

>> CHAIR:

REPRESENTATIVE CHRISTENSEN; WELCOME

TO COMMITTEE. THE CHAIR WILL MOVE

HOUSE FILE 3885 FOR

POSSIBLE INCLUSION. REPRESENTATIVE

CHRISTENSEN; PLEASE PROCEED.

>>

REPRESENTATIVE CHRISTENSEN: HOUSE FILE 3885 IS I THINK A

GOOD STEP IN SOMETHING WE CAN

DO RIGHT NOW TO MAKE SURE OUR

SCHOOLS ARE SAFE. IT PROVIDES

FOR GRANTS FOR SCHOOLS TO DO

SECURITY AUDITS ON THEIR SCHOOL

TOOZ FIGURE OUT WHAT ARE SOME

STEPS THEY CAN TAKE RIGHT NOW

TO IMPROVE THE

SCHOOL SECURITY; SOME OF THE STEPS COULD BE

UPGRADES AND SOME STEPS ARE

PROCEDURAL THINGS THAT

DONT COST MONEY. I THINK THIS IS A

GOOD BILL AND HAPPY TO DISCUSS

WITH MEMBERS.

>> CHAIR. : THANK YOU; DO WE

HAVE QUESTIONS FROM MEMBERS?

>> REPRESENTATIVE CONSIDINE: THANK YOU; MR. CHAIR. WHY DO

WE HAVE TWO BILLS THAT SEEM TO

DO THE EXACT SAME THING?

>>

REPRESENTATIVE CHRISTENSEN: MR. CHAIR; I THINK GREAT MINDS

THINK ALIKE. THE BILLS ARE

SIMILAR; THEY ARE

DAFTED DIFFERENTLY; BUT I THINK THEY

ARE BOTH GET AT THE SAME ISSUE

AND ARE GOOD IDEAS.

>>

REPRESENTATIVE CONSIDINE: CAN WE NOT GET TOGETHER AND

JUST MAKE ONE BILL INSTEAD OF

DOING THIS TOGETHER?

>> CHAIR: TO THE

TESTIFIERS. >> REPRESENTATIVE CHRISTENSEN:

I THINK THAT WILL BE THE

END RESULT AND WHY WE ARE KIND OF

HEARING THE BILLS

TOGETHER HERE.

>> CHAIR: ANYTHING ELSE

REPRESENTATIVE CONSIDINE?

>> REPRESENTATIVE CONSIDINE: YOU DO KNOW YOU ARE ON

THE SAME PARTY; RIGHT?

>> REPRESENTATIVE CHRISTENSEN:

YES.

>>

REPRESENTATIVE LUCERO: THANK YOU; MR. CHAIR AND THANK

YOU TO BOTH BILL AUTHORS

OF YOUR TWO BILLS. I KNOW THAT AS

INDEPENDENTLY EFFECTED OFFICIALS WE HAVE OUR OWN IDEAS

WHEN TWEE DRAW BILLS AND MAY

NOT KNOW WHAT OTHERS ARE

WORKING ON SO APPRECIATE YOUR

EFFORTS BOTH OF THE BILLS ARE

COMING BEFORE THE

COMMITTEE TODAY. THE QUESTION I HAVE FOR

REPRESENTATIVE CHRISTENSEN IS;

I'M NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE

AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR

INDUSTRIAL SECURITY AND THAT IS THE

ORGANIZATION THAT IS REFERENCED

IN TERMS OF HAVING TO HAVE A

CERTIFIED

PROTECTION PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATION IN ORDER TO QUALIFY FOOTOO

PERFORM SO WONDER IF YOU CAN ELABORATE

ON WHAT THAT ORGANIZATION IS

AND THEIR INVOLVEMENT IN THIS

PROCESS. THANK YOU.

>>

REPRESENTATIVE CHRISTENSEN: MR. CHAIR AND REPRESENTATIVE

JESSUP COULD MAYBE ADD MORE TO

THAT BUT BASICALLY THEY ARE THE

STANDARDS ORGANIZATION THAT

PROVIDE ACCREDITATION IN THIS

FIELD. THE RESULTS THAT WE

WILL BE LOOKING FOR AND ATYPE

OF ANALYSIS THAT WOULD BE DONE

IS VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT WAS

ROONTLY DONE BEFORE THE CAPITAL

RESTORATION ANALYZING THE SECURITY OF THE CAPITAL AND

STATE GOVERNMENT COMPLEX HERE.

>> REPRESENTATIVE LUCERO: NO

FOLLOW UP;

JUST WANTED OKNOW MORE ABOUT THE

ORGANIZATION. >> REPRESENTATIVE JESSUP:

THANK YOU. THANK YOU CHAIR;

THANK YOU MEMBERS FOR

COMMITTEE; MY APOLOGY FOR BEING

LATE. THANK YOU REPRESENTATIVE

CHRISTENSEN FOR BEING HERE ON

TIME AND I WILL JUST

SAY REPRESENTATIVE CONSIDINE; THIS

IS A UNIQUE EXPERIENCE. IT IS

QUITE A

PLESERABLE EXPERIENCE I WILL HAVE TO SAY; TAG TEAM WITH

A FELLOW REPRESENTATIVE; I GOT

TO SAY; THAT'S NOT A

BAD-THAT MAY NOT BE ABAG BAD GIG TO

CONSIDER FOR THE FUTURE BUT IT

ISCOURAGE NCOURAGING WE BOTH CAME UP WITH SIMILAR IDEAS AND

THINK THAT JUST

EMPHASIZES REALLY THE I THINK FOR ALL OF

US THIS WHOLE ISSUE OF SCHOOL

SAFETY IS WEIGHING ON THE MINDS

NOT ONLY OF MY

REPUBLICAN COLLEAGUE JZ THE

DEMOCRAT SIDE AS WELL; ALL OF US SO THIS IS A

INITIATIVE AND OPPORTUNITY TO

PUSH FORWARD.

REPRESENTATIVE CHRISTENSEN MENTIONED WE HAD GONE THROUGH BEFORE I HAD COME

REALLY SOME

CAPITAL SECURITY ASSESSMENT FOR THIS BUILDING

AND ALL THAT REPRESENT US

AS WELL AS WORK IN THIS

PARTICULAR CAPITAL AND THAT WAS WHY THE

ENTRANCE IN FRONT OF THE

CAPITAL WAS REMOVED. NOW IT IS

WALKING PATHS OUT THERE AND

THAT WAS PART OF THE SECURITY

EFFORT. AS WE

THINK THROUGH THAT; IF WE CAN DO THAT

FOR THE CAPITAL DURING THE

INVESTMENT WE MADE FOR THE

CAPITAL; WE NEED DO WHAT IS

SIMILAR FOR OUR SCHOOL AND

SCHOOL SYSTEMS ACROSS THE

STATE. I DON'T THINK

ANYONE HERE WOULD SAY THE LIVES OF THE

CHAIR FAIR MORE VALUABLE THE

LIVE FRZ ALL OF US SO THAT IS

WHY WE ARE HERE TOORB

TOGETHER. >> >> REPRESENTATIVE PINTO: THANK

YOU; MR. CHAIR AND THANK YOU TO

THE AUTHORS FOR BRINGING

THIS FORWARD. I FIND IT STRIKING WE

HAVE DOUBLED THE NUMBER OF

BILLS AS USUAL E; WE HAVE NOT A

SINGLE TESTIFY ON BEHALF OF

EITHER BILL. DO YOU HAVE

EXPERTS IN SCHOOL SAFETY;

THE YOUTH WHO WILL BE PROTECTED; I

FIND IT STRIKING THAT YOU JUST

HAVE THE TWO OF YOU AND DOUBLE

THE NUMBER BUT NOT SINGLE

PERSON TESTIFYING SAYING THIS IS THE RIGHT

STEP. I NOTICE THERE IS A APPROPRIATION THAT

IS 2 MILLION;

2 MILLION BUCKS THAT THAT IS THE RIGHT STEP TO

BE KEEPING STUDENTS SAFE. ANY

COMMENTS ON THAT I OFFER THAT

TUPE THE TWO TESTIFIERS.

>> CHAIR: TO THE TESTIFIERS.

>> MR.

CHAIR; REPRESENTATIVE PINTO; I THINK WE HAD A LOT OF

CONVERSATION WITH SCHOOL

OFFICIALS AND SCHOOL

DISTRICTS FOLKS AND THINK WE HEARD FROM

THEM PREVIOUSLY AND EDUCATION

COMMITTEE WHERE THOSE

STAKEHOLDERS FREQUENT; BUT I

THINK THIS IS A THOUGHT OUT

PROPOSAL THAT IS TALKED ABOUT

WITH SCHOOL DISTRICTS. THIS I

THINK IS SOMETHING WHERE WE GET

A LOT OF BANG FOR OUR BUCK FOR

A REASONABLY MODEST INVESTMENT

OF $2 MILLION; ANYWHERE FROM A

HUNDRED TO 400 SCHOOLS COULD

UTILIZE THIS GRANT PROCESS AND

DO AND KNOW HOW BEST TO INVEST

THEIR MONEY AS WELL AS

DO THINGS THAT COST LITTLE TO NO

MONEY THAT ARE JUST PROCEDURAL

CHANGES. >> REPRESENTATIVE PINTO: YES;

MR. CHAIR. SO IN THE

PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE WE DO HAVE

FOLKS WHO HAVE THEMSELVES

EXPERIENCED IN PUBLIC SAFETY

AND I'M PROSECUTOR AND SPEAK

FROM THAT PERSPECTIVE; YOU

HEARD FROM

REPRESENTATIVE GAROFALO AND DON'T KNOW THE

BACKGROUND OF THE BILL

AUTHORS BUT I UNDERSTAND THE THOUGHT

THERE WILL BE A LOT OF-THIS

WILL BE A USEFUL THING; BUT IF

YOU HAVE BEEN TALKING TO

SCHOOLS AND EXPERTS IN SCHOOL

SAFETY MY THOUGHT IS I

WOULD FIND IT MORE CREDIBLE WITH

REEXPECT TO HEAR

FROM THEM SAYING THIS IS WHAT WE NEED

THEN TO BE HEARING FROM THE

AUTHORS. WE NEED TO HEAR FROM

YOU; BUT IF THIS TRUEY IS

SOMETHING DESIRED I EXPECT WE

WOULD HEAR THAT FROM FOLKS AND

THE OTHER QUESTION IS; DO YOU

HAVE SIMILAR BILLS TO ADDRESS

AUDITS AND SAFETY IN THE OTHER

LOCATION WHERE MASS SHOOTINGS

OCCURRED SO THINKING IS THERE A

BILL REGARDING CONCERT HALLS;

NIGHT CLUBS; CHUNCHS; THE

PRAYER CIRCLES THAT OCCURRED

THERE; PARKS AND HIGHER ED

AREAS; SO I APPRECIATE THE

SELECTION OF THIS

PARTICULAR AREA. THE YOUTH ARE BEING

PROTECTED HERE I

HEAR THEM ASKING FOR A LOT OF

OTHER THINGS AND I WANT TO MAKE

SURE OF COURSE WE ARE PROVIDING THAT

SAFETY AND OTHER LOCATIONS AS

WELL SO WONDER WHEN THOSE BILLS

WILL BE COMING OUT.

>>

CHAIR: REPRESENTATIVE JESSUP ARE YOU TAKING THAT

ONE?

>>

REPRESENTATIVE JESSUP: I THINK WE ARE ON A PROGRESSION

HERE REPRESENTATIVE PINTO. WE

HAVE SEEN EVERY SINCE 911; 2001

WE FOCUSED UPON AIRPORT

SECURITY AND MAKING SURE WE

WILL NEVER HAVE ANOTHER 911

AGAIN. THAT WAS PROBABLY STEP

ONE. SINCE THEN WE AS A

SOCIETY EVOLVED. THINK OF THE

STADIUMS AND CHECKS WE GO

THROUGH WHEN WE GO INTO A

STADIUM EITHER FOR A SPORTS

EFFORT OR ENTERTAINMENT. I

LOOK AT-I LIKE

YOUR QUESTION AND LOOK AT AND SAY THIS IS A

EVOLVING PROCESS FOR US ALL AND

I WOULD HAVE TO SAY QUITE

HONESTLY I THINK

SCHOOLS ARE THE NEXT ON THE

PRIORITY LIST. PERHAPS THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN

EARLIER BUT THEY NEED TO BE UP

NOW AND WE NEED A

BASELINE; HOW SAFE ARE THE SCHOOLS? ALL OF

US ESPECIALLY THOSE THAT HAVE

CHILDREN OR HAD CHILDREN GO

THROUGH THE SCHOOLS WE ALL

SAY; OUR SCHOOLS ARE

REAL SAFE; WELL; THAT IS BECAUSE WE ARE IN

A TRUSTING ENVIRONMENT. AT

LEAST IN MY KIDS ARE

GROWN NOW SO I GIVE THAT CONTEXT. YOU

MOST LIKELY HAVE CHILDREN IN

SCHOOL REPRESENTATIVE PINTO; SO

I HAVE TO BACK MY CONTEXT UP

SLIGHTLY; BUT I WILL SAY THAT

THERE IS OFTEN WE TALK ABOUT IN

COMMUNITIES WE REALLY WANT A

LEVEL OF TRUST BETWEEN

FAMILIES AND BETWEEN THE SCHOOLS FOR

WHICH THE CHILDREN ATTENDS AND

I FELT THAT BUT I LOOK NOW AT A

SCHOOL AND I DID AND

TURCHED BASE WITH

SUPERINTENT END AND LOOK AT THE SCHOOLS AND DON'T WANT TO LOOK AT IT FROM

THIS CONTEXT BUT IS THE SCHOOL

PENETRABLE FROM THE OUTSIDE TO

DO DAMAGE INSIDE AND THAT IS

NOT WHERE I WANT TO PUT MY

MIND BUT THINK WE ARE IN A POSITION

NOW IN SOCIETY WHERE WE NEED TO

DO THAT AND THE BILLS

THAT REPRESENTATIVE CHRISTENSEN AND

I HAVE BEFORE YOU IS REALLY IF

WE CAN DO AUDITS ON SCHOOLS AND

AGAIN; SOME SCHOOLS HAVE

ALREADY GONE THERE AND

FOCUSED UPON SCHOOL SAFETY BUT THERE

ARE OTHER SCHOOLS IN THE STATE

OF MINNESOTA THAT HAVEN'T HAD

THE OPPORTUNITY OR FUNDING. WE

NEED TO ESTABLISH

A BASELINE AND WHERE WE ARE AT TODAY

WITH THE SAFETY IN THE SCHOOLS AND

IT ISN'T JUST THE

BUILDINGS. IT IS ALSO THE CRISIS

MANAGEMENT PLANS IN PLACE.

WHAT ARE THE

PROCEDURES THAT OCCUR FOR A SCHOOL IF THEY

ENCOUNTERED A DISRUPTION AND THAT COULD BE A TORNADO AS WELL

AS SOMEONE COMING TO THE SCHOOL

THAT SHOULDN'T BE

THERE; BUT I THINK WE NEED TO ESTABLISH A

BASELINE FOR THE SCHOOLS AND

THIS IS A FIRST STEP TO GET

AFTER THAT AND TO

YOUR POINT; PERHAPS WE NEED TO DO SIMILAR

ONCE WE REALLY TACKLE THE

SUBJECT AT SCHOOLS AND LOOK

ELSEWHERE FOR OTHER VENUES THAT

ARE PUBLIC VENUES.

>> REPRESENTATIVE PINTO: ARE

THESE BILLS BEING LAID OVER FOR

POSSIBLE INCLUSION OR REMIND ME

OF THE PATH?

>> CHAIR: THEY ARE BOTH

GOING TO BE LAID OVER.

>> REPRESENTATIVE PINTO: THANK

YOU MR. CHAIR. THANK YOU FOR

THE TESTIFIERS. I THINK

I'M DONE. THANK YOU MR. CHAIR.

>> CHAIR: NEXT ON THE LIST; WE

HAVE REPRESENTATIVE O'NEILL.

>>

REPRESENTATIVE O'NEILL: THANK YOU MR. CHAIR. I WAS

GOING TO ADDRESS SOMETHING

REPRESENTATIVE PINTO

INQUIRED ABOUT HAVING TWO BILLS AT THE

SAME TIME AND THIS IS BEFORE

YOU WERE ELECTED BUT I WAS A

FRESHMAN AND THERE WERE 5 OF US

THAT HAD DIFFERENT

VARIATIONS OF REPEALING THE BUSINESS TO

BUSINESS TAXES THAT HAD BEEN

ENACTED THE YEAR BEFORE AND

FOUND THAT WAS A REALLY BAD

IDEA; THERE WERE 5 OF US THAT

CAME BEFORE THE TAX COMMITTEE

WITH ALL DIFFERENT VARIATIONS

OF IT SO THAT WE CAN ALL BE

HEARD; SOME HAD THE SAME

THING AND THE CHAIR WAS GRACES ENOUGH

TO HEAR ALL OF US. I REMEMBER

SITTING SIDE BY SIDE WITH NOW

SENATOR ISAACSON;

THEN REPATIVE ISAACSON SO IT IS DONE AND IT

ISN'T DONE MAYBE AS OFTEN; BUT

WHEN IT IS REALLY

REALLY IMPORTANT ISSUE LIKE THIS T IS

DONE; SO JUST SO YOU KNOW WHEN

I WAS A FRESHMAN 5 YEARS AGO

NOW THAT DID TAKE PLACE ALSO I

WANT TO REMIND TOO WE HAD A

PRESENTATION; THOROUGH AND

IN-DEPTH PRESENTATION FROM

HOME LAND SECURITY DOING THE

AUDITS SO SINCE YOU ARE NOT MEMBERS OF

THE COMMITTEE; I WANTED YOU TO

HEAR THAT HOME LAND SECURITY

DOES A GREAT JOB DOING THE

AUDITS AND HAD BEEN DOING

AUDITS; THEY HAD DONE I

THINK OVER 100 ODD TDS OF SCHOOLS AND

ASSISTING THEM AND TRYING TO

HARDIN THE SCHOOLS AND

PROVIDE PROTECTION; SO THIS IS

SOMETHING WE TALKED ABOUT EARLY

ON AND I AM GLAD WE ARE

FINISHING UP THE SECOND

DEADLINE WEEK WITH THIS BECAUSE

IT HAS COME FULL CIRCJL GOOD

TO SEE MONEY PUT TO THAT SO THE

SCHOOLS CAN ACTUALLY CHOIR WHETHER IT IS HOME LAND SECURE

OR SOMEBODY ELSE TO COME IN AND

DO A AUDIT. I WAS IN THE MAPLE

LAKES SCHOOL ABOUT THREE WEEKS

AGO WITH A SUPERINTENEDANT

AND HE WANTED TO

TALK ABOUT SCHOOL SAFETY AS A COUPLE OTHER OF MY

PRINCIPLES AND

SUPERINTENDENTS DID AND THEY HAD HAD A CURSORY

AUDIT SO THEY HAD LOCAL LAW

ENFORCEMENT COME IN AND THE

SHERIFF DEPARTMENT COME IN AND

MAKE SUGGESTIONS AND SAID; YOU

KNOW WHAT; THIS DOOR COULD BE

PROPPEDOPEGEN SOMETIME THAIZ

ARE SO IF YOU HAVE A BAD ACTOR

THE BAD ACTOR CAN OPEN UP THE

DOOR AND LET SOMEBODY IN SO YOU

SHOULD THINK ABOUT THAT. YOU

HAVE THE THREE PANELS OF GLASS

DOORS THAT

ARE WHERE PEOPLE COME IN AND THEY CAN EASILY BE

TAKEN OUT AND JUST WALK IN

THERE. HE HAD VERY CONCRETE

THINGS THEY WERE

CONSIDERED TO HARDIN THE SCHOOL AND PROTECT

THE

STUDENTS. THESE ARE-THIS IS THE TIME WE LIVE IN AND I

APPRECIATE YOU BRINGING THIS PR

FRWARD AND I HAVE SEEN

IN MY DISTRICT IN THE LAST MONTH THE

RAISED LEVEL OF CONCERN AND

THEIR ACTION AND RESPONSE TO IT

SO I APPRECIATE YOU GIB THG

SCHOOLS THE TOOL THEY NEED TO

FURTHER HARDIN THE SCHOOLS AND PROTECT THE CHILDREN. THANK

YOU. >> CHAIR: THANK YOU. I MIGHT

ADD ANOKA HENNEPIN HAS BEEN

DOING THIS THE PAST YEAR. WE

PASSED A BOND ISSUE. ALL THE

ISSUEERIZE BEING ADDRESSED AND THIS WILL BE HELPFUL FOR OTHER

SCHOOLS. REPRESENTATIVE

BECKER FINN. I BELIEVE YOU

HAD SOMETHING TO ADD.

>> REPRESENTATIVE BECKER

FIN: THANK YOU; MR.

CHAIR. REPRESENTATIVE JESSUP IS THE

OTHER SIDE OF MY DISTRICT SO WE

SHARE REPRESENTATION FOR PART

OF MOUNTAIN VIEW SCHOOLS AND I

AM A COAUTHOR ON

REPRESENTATIVE JESSUP'S BILL AND THE REASON IS

BECAUSE I THINK THIS IS

THE TIME WE NEED TO COMPREHENSIVELY

ADDRESS THE PROBLEM OF OUR

KIDS BEING SAFE WHILE THEY ARE AT

SCHOOL; AND I AM IN MY SON'S

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LITERALLY

EVERY DAY WHEN DROP HIM

OFF AND I KNOW WE HAD BONDING

ISSUES ON THE BALLOT LAST YEAR

IN ALL THE SCHOOL DISTRICT JZ

PART OF THE ASK IS SO THEY

COULD DO WORK AROUND THAT. ONE

OF THE REASONS I SIGNED ON TO

YOUR BILL IS BECAUSE IT

INCLUDES THE

CRISIS MANAGEMENT POLICY SO JUST TO-IT IS BROADER

THAN JUST THE

PHYSICAL STRUCTURES; WE HAVE TO HAVE

GOOD POLICIES SO WE ARE

REACTING SAFELY FOR OUR KIDS;

AND I THINK IN ORDER TO DO

THAT; COMPREHENSIVELY WE ALSO

HAVE TO ADDRESS GUNS; NOBODY

SAID THE WORD GUN YET IN

THIS HEARING; BUT THAT IS

REALLY WHAT-WE TALK ABOUT IT

BEING PENETRABLE WE TALK ABOUT THE

FEAR WE HAVE AND THE DESIRE TO

PROTECT OUR KIDS; THAT IS PART

THE PUZZLE TOO; AND WE ARE

NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO

FULLY PROTECT KIDS TO THE DEGREE THAT

WE WANT TO IF WE ARE NOT

COMPREHENSIVELY DOING THAT AND

REPRESENTATIVE JESSUP YOU

SPOKE TO FEELING SAFE IN

OUR SCHOOLS AND I THINK WE VERY CLEARLY

FROM THE THOUSANDS OF

YOUNG PEOPLE WHO CAME OUT JUST IN THE

LAST COUPLE WEEKS THAT KIDS

DON'T FEEL SAFE IN SCHOOL AND

WE HAVE OUR YOUNG PEOPLE

TELLING US THAT; SO I'M HAPPY

TO SUPPORT THIS BILL AND I

WOULD JUST ENCOURAGE MEMBERS

AND PARTICULARLY

REPRESENTATIVE JESSUP TO LOOK AT ALL ASPECTS

IN HOW WE PROTECT OUR KIDS IN

SCHOOL; BECAUSE WE

ABSOLUTELY DO NEED TO ADDRESS THIS; SO I

THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THIS

FORWARD AND HOPE THAT WE CAN

BROADEN THE SCOPE SO WE ARE

REALLY ADDRESSING THIS PROBLEM

IN A MEANINGFUL WAY AND THE WAY

OUR YOUNG PEOPLE ARE ASKING TO

BE PROTECTED. THANK YOU.

>> CHAIR: THANK YOU

REPRESENTATIVE. THE LAST PERSON WE HAVE ON THE LIST IS

REPRESENTATIVE [INAUDIBLE

COMMENTS] >> TO THE BILL AUTHOR YZ

HAVE A FEW THINGS I WANT TO TALK ABOUT

HERE AND I'M TRY ING TO

UNDERSTAND THE ORDERS. WHEN I

THINK ABOUT $2 MILLION JUST I

THINK IT WAS YESTERDAY IN

CAPITAL INVESTMENT WE HEARD

ABOUT A FUND GRANT PROGRAM

THAT WAS GOING TO SET UP SO THAT

SCHOOLS HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO

GET THE MONEY TO ACTUALLY

DO THIS SO THAT IS A GOOD WAY TO

START BUT THAT WAS ONLY $5

MILLION; AND I'M SITTING HERE

AND THINK IF WE DO $2 MILLION

FOR AUDITS; IT'S LIKELY GOING

TO SHOW A WHOLE LOT MORE THAN

$5 MILLION OF NEEDS THAT

WILL BE OUT IN THE SCHOOLS; SO I'M

NOT SURE WE ARE RIGHT ON

THINKING ABOUT THE MONEY AND

IMPLICATION OF HOW

WE WOULD FINANCE THESE TYPE OF PROJECTS;

BUT I ALSO HAVE CONCERN THAT

REPRESENTATIVE BECKER FINN BROUGHT UP AND THAT IS THAT YOU

KNOW; WE ARE LOOKING AT TRYING

TO MAKE OUR SCHOOLS SO

SECURE THAT OUR FEAR OF

ALLEVIATING THE POSSIBILITY OF A

MASS SHOOTER COMING IN AND KILLING

OUR KIDS IS SOMEHOW WE ARE

SATISFIED; AND I WILL USE

RHETORIC THAT DOESN'T COME FROM

ME; IT COMES FROM THE

OTHER SIDE IS BAD PEOPLE WILL ALWAYS

FIND A WAY; AND I THINK WE NEED

TO HAVE THAT AS PART OF OUR

DISCUSSION TO REALIZE WHAT WE

ARE DOING ISN'T

ASSUREING SAFETY AND SECURITY FOR OUR

KID; IT ISN'T INSURING SAFETY

OR SECURITY FOR ANYBODY IF WE

MOVE IT TO MOVIE THEATERS OR

EVENT CENTERS OR THINGS LIKE

THAT AND PART OF IT BECAUSE

GUNS ARE VERY PREVALENT IN OUR

SOCIETY AND AS LONG AS GUNS ARE

PREVALENT IN OUR SOCIETY WE

WILL ALWAYS HAVE INCIDENT LIKE

THIS. I APPRECIATE THAT THE

CHAIR WAS WILLING TO HEAR THIS

BILL AND HAVE THIS

CONVERSATION; BUT THE REASON WE

ARE DOING THIS BILL IS BECAUSE

OF MASS SHOOTINGS; BECAUSE OF

SOME STUDENTS AND AN ADULT

KILLED IN

PARKLAND FLORIDA AND IT WAS BECAUSE OF A GUN; A

SEMI-AUTOMATIC RIFLE BUT YET WE

CAN'T HAVE A HEARING ABOUT

THAT. I THINK THIS IS GREAT; I

THINK WE NEED TO DO THESE TYPE

OF THINGS; BUT ALSO THINK WE

NEED TO HAVE THAT BROADER

CONVERSATION AND UNTIL WE HAVE

THAT BROADER CONVERSATION I

THINK WE ARE JUST PUTTING FALSE

SECURITY WITH PEOPLE OUT THERE

AND WE ARE ABLE TO PAT

OURSELVES ON THE BACK AND SAID

WE DID SOMETHING 6789 WE ARE

REALLY NOT DOING ANYTHING. WE

ARE REALLY TRYING TO MAKE THE

SCHOOLS MORE SECURE BUT WE ALSO

KNOW IF THERE ARE BAD

PEOPLE THEY WILL FIND A WAY; AND IF

THAT'S BEING OUT SOMEWHERE

WHEN KIDS GET OUT OAF SCHOOL TO GET

ON THE BUS; THERE IS A

OPPORTUNITY. ARE WE BUILDING

TUNNELS THAT ARE SECURE FOR THE

KIDS TO LEAVE THE

SCHOOLS TO GET TO THE BUSES AND DO WE MAKE

THE BUSES

IMPENETRABLE? WHAT I'M TRYING TO SAY; IS

THIS A LITTLE PIECE OF A

MUCH LARGER THING AND HOPE WE CONTINUE TO

HAVE THE CONVERSATION ABOUT THE

LARGER THING THAT IS MAKING OUR

CHILDREN IN SCHOOLS VULNERABLE

AND MAKING THEM SCARED AND

PUTTING THEM IN

SITUATIONS WHERE THEY ARE STRESSED. WHEN

KIDS GO THROUGH TRAINING ABOUT

LOCK-DOWN AND

WHAT HAPPENS IF THE IS A SHOOTER IN THE SCHOOL;

I COULDINATE IMAGINE WHAT

THAT WOULD BE LIKE TO BE A KID THAT

IS 8; 9 OR 10

GOING THROUGH THAT AND THEN HAVING TO GO BACK

TO THE CLASSROOM AND LEARN.

SO; I APPRECIATE THESE

BILLS; I THINK THEY ARE A LITTLE BIT OF

A START; BUT THINK WE HAVE A

LONG WAY TO GO.

>> CHAIR: THANK YOU. WE HAVE

ADDED A FEW MORE TO THE LIST

HERE. >>

REPRESENTATIVE GROSSELL: THANK YOU; GENTLEMEN FOR

BRINGING THESE BILLS FORWARD; IT IS A START. IT IS A START.

LIKE EVERYBODY SAID THAT IS A

DROP IN THE BUCKET; ONLY THE

BEGINNING. TO SAY THAT THE END

ALL BE ALL IS TO DO ANYTHING

WITH GUNS; THAT'S JUST ONE

LITTLE PIECE THAT IF YOU DID

ANYTHING WITH THAT LIKE YOU

SAID IT WOULDN'T MAKE A LOT OF

DIFFERENCE; SO WITH THAT

BEING SAID; THERE IS BIGGER

ISSUES THAT WE NEED TO DEAL WITH.

MAKING SCHOOLS SAFE; THAT'S A

PRIORITY. I HAVE BEEN IN LAW

ENFORCEMENT AND PUBLIC SAFETY

FOR MANY YEARS TO TRY TO MAKE

THINGS; PEOPLE SAFE. TRY TO

MAKE COMMUNITIES A BETTER PLACE

TO LIVE. TRYING TO MAKE SURE

THAT THESE KIDS CAN GO TO

SCHOOL UNAFRAID OF DRUG

EDEALERS; UNAFRAID OF PREDATORY

OFFENDERS OF ALL KINDS. PEOPLE

THAT DO THEM HARM WITH WEAPONS;

MY MOLESITATION; VICTIMIZING IN

MANY DIFFERENT WAYS. IF WE GET

ON TRACK AND START DEAL WG THE

REAL ISSUES LOOK AT OUR

SOCIETY; GUNS HAVE BEEN A PART

OF OUR NATION FROM THE

FOUNDATION. THESE MASS MURDERS

ARE THINGS THAT HAPPEN AND THEY

ARE OUTRAGEOUS AND IT HURTS

EVERYONE. IT HURTS EVERYONE.

THERE ARE PEOPLE USING FIRE

ALARMS TO GET PEOPLE TO COME

OUT OF BUILDINGS AND CRASH INTO

WITH A VEHICLE AND SLASH WITH

KNIVES. WE NEED TO TAKE KNIVES

AWAY; AND CARS.

DOESN'T SOLVE IT; DOES IT? THE PROBLEM IS IN

OUR SOCIETY; THE DEGRADATION OF

OUR SOCIETY. QUH I WAS A KID

TO NOW; THE CHANGES I

HAVE SEEN AND BEING IN

LAW ENFORCEMENT BOTH ENDS OF THE SPECTRUM OF

EVIL VERSUS GOOD; YOU GUYS HAVE

SEEN IT AS PROSECUTORS; I

HAVE SEEN IT RAW AND FRESH ON THE

FRONT

LINES. YOUTH MURDERED BECAUSE THEY ARE INVOLVED

WITH GANGS AND DRUGS. RIGHT ON DOWN

THE LINE. THERE IS A LOT MORE

TO DEAL WITH AND GUNS ARE NOT

GOING TO DO IT; MAKE ING THE

KIDS SAFE ISN'T GOING TO FILL

IT ALL EITHER. WE GOT TO GET

THE FOCUS ON WHAT NEEDS TO BE

DONE AND THAT'S A HEART AND

MIND CHANGE IN THIS NATION AND

OF ITS PEOPLE. WE HAVE BEGUN

TO ACCEPT SO MANY THINGS THAT

20 YEARS AGO WERE NOT

ACCEPTABLE; BUT WE KEEP GOING

DOWN HILL. I'M SPEAKING AS A

FATHER; I'M SPEAKING AS A LAW

ENFORCEMENT OFFICER; TRYING TO

KEEP MY KIDS SAFE AND TRYING TO

KEEP YOURS SAFE AS WELL. IF WE

GET OUR FOCUS ON THE RIGHT

PLACE; WE CAN START MAKING

A DIFFERENCE.

>> CHAIR: THANK YOU; MATTE;

MATT; REPRESENTATIVE WARD; BELIEVE YOU HAVE THE LAST WORD

ON THE

SUBJECT. >> REPRESENTATIVE WARD: THANK

YOU; MR. CHAIR; I APPRECIATE

BEING RECOGNIZED. I WAS PART

OF SEVERAL SCHOOL DISTRICTS IN

THE EAST METRO AREA THAT MET

WITH TRAINERS-I DON'T REMEMBER

WHETHER IT WAS HOME LAND

SECURITY OR THE EQUIVALENT OF

THAT; EXPERTS COMING FROM THE

NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AFTER

COLLIN BINE SO WE HAD HUGE

ROOMS OF

EDUCATORS; ADMINISTRATORS; TEACHERS AND

SOME STUDENTS GOING THROUGH A

CONVERSATION ABOUT WHAT

HAPPENED AT COLUMBINE AND

WHAT SCHOOLS NEEDED TO DO AND THAT

WAS PART THE ASSESSMENT SO IT

IS ONGOING AND IT IS A PIECE OF

A EVOLUTION. THIS IS A PART OF

THE PUZZLE; A LARGE PUZZLE THAT

HAS A LOT OF PIECES THAT WE

HAVE IN SOME CASES NEGLECTED.

ONE IS SCHOOL COUNSELORS AND

OTHER IS SUPPORT SERVICES FOR

STUDENTS; SERIOUSLY LACKING IN

OUR SCHOOLS. ALL OF

OUR SCHOOLS. WE HAVE A VIOLENT

CULTURE; AND THAT'S ONE OF THE

THINGS I AGREE REPRESENTATIVE

GROSSELL WE REALLY NEED TO

ADDRESS. PART OF THE PUZZLE.

HEALTHCARE; MENTAL

HEALTH SERVICES; SOME KNOW

MY YOUNGER SON IS A ER DOCTOR AND WE HAD

CONVERSATIONS ABOUT A SHIFT

DOESN'T GO BY BUT HE HAS

SOMEONE COMING IN WITH

REACHING THE BOTTOM WHETHER THEY ARE

DEPRESSED OR WHETHER THEY HAVE

AN ADDICTION PROBLEM; AND

THEY WANT HELP; AND HE CAN'T DO

ANYTHING BECAUSE THERE ARE NO

BEDS. IF THEY ARE REALLY DRUNK

OUT OF THEIR MINDS HE CAN HOLD

THEM 24 HOUR JZ HOPEFULLY THEY

WILL GET SERVICES AS THEY

SOBER UP THEY WILL BE IN A

POSITION WHERE THEY CAN ASK FOR HELP;

AND IF THEY GOT

MONEY SOMEHOW THERE WILL BE A BED THAT WILL

TAKE THEM; THEY WILL FIND A

BED; BUT THEY HAVE

TO HAVE MONEY; THEY HAVE TO HAVE CASH

OR HAVE TO HAVE INSURANCE THAT

WILL COVER THEM. AND WE ARE

MISSING ALL OF THOSE PEOPLE.

THEY ARE DROPPING THROUGH THE

CRACKS BECAUSE WE DON'T PROVIDE

THE SERVICES THAT THEY NEED SO

IT IS BIGGER PROBLEM THAN

THE SCHOOLS; BUT I HAVE ONE

QUESTION; A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN

THESE TWO BILLS AND THOUGHT WE

ARE HEARING THIS

UNEDUCATION; WHY IS IT IN PUBLIC SAFETY?

ONE SAYS PUBLIC SAFETY AND ONE

SAYS EDUCATION; DEPARTMENT OF

EDUCATION; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC

SAFETY. ARE WE ASKING FOR

MONEY FROM BOTH OF

THESE AGENCIES OR IS IT LAID OVER

HERE; IT IS IN PUBLIC

SAFETY BUDGET? AND Y WOULD LIKE TO

CLAR IFICATION ON THAT PLEASE.

>> CHAIR. TO THE

TESTIFIERS WHO WANTS TO TAKE THAT ONE?

>> REPRESENTATIVE JESSUP: MR.

CHAIR AND ROPET

ATIVE WARD; I WOULD SAY AT THIS POINT IT WILL

BE LAID OVER AND

PROBABLY DISCUSSED BETWEEN CHAIR OF YOUR

COMMITTEE AS WELL AS THE CHAIR

OF EDUCATION FINANCE TO

DETERMINE WHERE SHOULD THIS

BEST FIT. I DON'T COME BEFORE

YOU AND SAY I HAVE THE ANSWER

TO YOUR QUESTION; BUT I

ANTICIPATE THAT IF THIS

COMMITTEE AGREES YES THIS IS

THE RIGHT INITIATIVE TO MOVE

FORWARD; EDUCATION FINANCE SAID

YES WE BELIEVE THE IS

INITIATIVE TO MOVE FORWARD. WE

HAD SIMILAR HEARINGS IN THE

SENATE AT SOME POINT IT WILL BE

PUT INTO ONE OF THE TWO

COMMITTEES ON THE BILLS.

>> CHAIR: THANK YOU. WAS

THERE ONE SMALL [INAUDIBLE

COMMENTS] >> I WANT TO ASK;

REPRESENTATIVE WARD POINTING OUT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE

BILLS MADE

ME NOTICE REPRESENTATIVE [INAUDIBLE

COMMENTS] I ASSUME IS REAL

APPEALING TO ALL SO I WONDER IF

REPRESENTATIVE

CHRISTENSEN COULD IF AS THE BILL GETS

MERGED FORWARD IF THAT IS

SOMETHING YOU ANTICIPATE SUPPORTING TO MAKE SURE THE

LANGUAGE DOES INCLUDE THE

LANGUAGE IN

REPRESENTATIVE JESSUP'S BILL BUT TAKING A LOOK

THAT FULL SECURITY PICTURE FOR

THE SCHOOLS THAT INCLUDE THE

CRISIS MANAGEMENT POLICY.

>> REPRESENTATIVE

CHRISTENSEN: I ABSOLUTELY SUPPORT THAT

LANGUAGE WE JUST DRAFTD

DIFFERENTLY. >> CHAIR: ANYONE FROM THE

PUBLIC THAT WOULD LIKE TO OFFER

TESTIMONY ON EITHER OF THESE

BILLS? OKAY; SEEING NONE-CHAIR

WILL MOVE THAT HOUSE FILE 3885

LAID OVER

FOR POSSIBLE INCLUSION IN THE

OMNIBUS BILL; AND HOUSE FILE 3676 WILL BE

LAID OVER FOR POSSIBLE

INCLUSION ALSO. THANK YOU FOR

YOUR TESTIMONY.

ANYTHING ELSE? ALRIGHT; THANK YOU FOR COMING

AND WE'LL

ADJOURN. [MEETING ADJOURNED]

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét