Thứ Bảy, 30 tháng 9, 2017

News on Youtube Sep 30 2017

Welcome to LearnLawBetter.

Have you read International Shoe Co. v. Washington and are wondering what the case is all about?

In today's episode I will provide you with the relevant facts, the rule you need for

exam purposes, and an exam tip for nailing the analysis section on an essay exam.

Hi, this is Beau Baez, and today I want to talk to you about one of the Supreme Court's

landmark cases, International Shoe Co. v Washington.

International Shoe Company was a shoe company incorporated in Delaware and its principal

place of business in Missouri.

In Washington State, International Shoe hired 13 people to solicit orders for the shoes,

but not to actually sell any shoes in the State of Washington.

Once the orders were taken, the salesmen sent the order forms back to headquarters in Missouri,

where the decision was made on whether or not to sell the shoes.

This method insured that all shoe sales occurred in Missouri, and was a fairly common tax strategy

during that era to avoid a State's sales and income taxes.

But the State of Washington was not trying to enforce one of these taxes, but rather

its unemployment insurance tax as applied to the International Shoe salesmen.

Because International Shoe refused to pay the unemployment insurance tax, Washington

State sued International Shoe in its own State courts to enforce the tax assessment.

Because International Shoe's office was located in Missouri, Washington State sent

notice of the lawsuit to those offices by registered mail.

International Shoe claimed that since they did not have a permanent presence in Washington

State, the notice sent by mail into Missouri violated the Due Process clause of the United

States Constitution.

And finally, this brings us to the primary issue in the case: Does the Due Process clause

allow a State court to exercise in personam jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant

who does not have a permanent presence in the State.

The Supreme Court explained that historically, in personam jurisdiction required the defendant's

physical presence in the State, citing Pennoyer v. Neff—for more information on that case, watch my

episode called "Sex and the Senator in Pennoyer v. Neff."

Though the Court could easily have found that International Shoe was physically present

in Washington State, the Court chose to articulate the following new rule: To exercise in personam

jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant, the Due Process clause requires the defendant

to have minimum contacts with the forum State such that the suit does not offend traditional

notions of fair play and substantial justice.

Applied to the facts in this case, the Court noted that 13 salesmen soliciting orders for

a substantial number of shoes meets the minimum contacts test.

On a final exam, what this means is that you will examine every contact that the out-of-state

defendant has with the State where the plaintiff files suit.

Given that companies can do business over the Internet today without ever sending a human

into another State, the minimum contacts test is very important.

Your job on an exam is to persuade the grader that there are, or are not minimum contacts

in that state's courts.

Usually, your professor will give you a set of facts that can go either way, so don't

spend a lot of time looking for the "right" answer.

The only right answer is one that identifies the issue, correctly states the rule of law,

and then provides a well-thought out reason for whatever conclusion you happen to reach.

For help on developing strong analysis, look at my episode called "Three Steps to Better

Analysis."

If you'd like to see more episodes that can help you succeed, hit the subscribe button.

Also, don't forget to check out LearnLawBetter.com where you will find more resources to help

you get ahead, including my blog, newsletter, and exam bank.

Thanks for watching.

For more infomation >> International Shoe Co. v. Washington - Duration: 4:35.

-------------------------------------------

HHS Secretary Tom Price resigns and Puerto Rico slowly responds after hurricane - Duration: 24:26.

ROBERT COSTA: Under pressure from the president, Tom Price resigns. I'm Robert Costa.

We discuss a week of White House setbacks, controversies, and the new Republican tax

plan, tonight on Washington Week. Fear and desperation in Puerto Rico.

SAN JUAN MAYOR CARMEN YULIN CRUZ: (From video.) This is not a good news story.

This is a people are dying story. This is a life or death story.

ROBERT COSTA: The Trump administration defends its response to Hurricane Maria.

ACTING SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY ELAINE DUKE: (From video.) I am proud of the work

that's being done. I am proud of Americans helping Americans, friends and strangers alike.

ROBERT COSTA: Nine days after the storm, more than 3 million Americans face dire shortages.

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: (From video.) We're going to cut taxes for the middle class,

make the tax code simpler and more fair for everyday Americans.

ROBERT COSTA: President Trump rolls out his tax overhaul that he says is pro-growth and

pro-family, but Democrats are skeptical.

SENATE MINORITY LEADER CHARLES SCHUMER (D-NY): (From video.) It's little more than an

across-the-board tax cut for America's millionaires and billionaires.

ROBERT COSTA: Is the GOP's failure on health care an omen on taxes?

ANNOUNCER: (From video.) Judge Roy Moore!

ROBERT COSTA: And why is the Alabama election sending shockwaves through the Republican

establishment? We cover it all with Susan Davis of NPR, Jeff Zeleny of CNN,

Yamiche Alcindor of The New York Times, and Michael Scherer of The Washington Post.

ANNOUNCER: Celebrating 50 years, this is Washington Week.

Once again, live from Washington, moderator Robert Costa.

ROBERT COSTA: Good evening. Tom Price stepped down as Health and Human Services

secretary late Friday. His resignation was the ultimate price for using private jets

and military aircraft for government business. Price had taken more than two dozen

chartered flights since May, totaling more than $400,000.

Price also used military aircraft for trips to Europe, Africa, and Asia this summer.

Three other Cabinet members are also under scrutiny for their travel expenses: Treasury

Secretary Steve Mnuchin, EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, and Interior Secretary Ryan

Zinke. Jeff, you think about Secretary Price. He's been in Congress. He's a Washington

insider. He knows the rules. He knew, as a public servant, that this information

would likely get out there. Where is the judgment?

JEFF ZELENY: I think that's a great question. And he knows the rules; he also has been

one of the leading people who criticized Democrats for doing this. I mean, there's

soundbites this week of him blasting Nancy Pelosi for flying on a private plane. So I

think the judgment is, when you become a Cabinet secretary, you reach a different level.

You have staff around you. Someone should have hit the stop button here and not allowed

all this to go. You know, we've talked to a lot of people, and a lot of theories abound.

One is there are a lot of members of this Cabinet who are wealthy, a few who have their

own fleet of planes or their own planes, and they fly. So it seems like, well, if they're

doing that, perhaps so can I. But that is not what, you know, the law really allows.

And even if it was legal, a new instructive from the OMB going out to the White House

chief of staff just on Friday evening says that just because something is legal does not

mean that you should do it. So I think the - overall, this is the - you know, another

Friday night firing. We've seen a lot of them, but this is the first Cabinet secretary

to be shown the door here. But I think also it's slightly more than just optics.

We asked the president about that today, if he had confidence in him, and he said it's

optics. But it's also he didn't get the job done. He was hired to get health care

through. That didn't happen. So why keep him around?

MICHAEL SCHERER: You know, it's also a reaction to the first few months in this

administration, where nobody really had control of everything that was going on, nobody

was really minding the store. You know, one of the things we found out is that a senior

White House aide was on some of these flights, so it wasn't as if, you know, the Health

and Human Services secretary was off doing this freelancing with no one knowing.

The White House was flying with him, you know, a $20,000 flight to Philadelphia from D.C.

I mean, that's just not a flight you take if you live here.

ROBERT COSTA: Sue, when you're on Capitol Hill, and Yamiche you've been there this week

as well, are Republican lawmakers standing back and saying what's going on with this

administration? Because it's not just Price.

SUSAN DAVIS: It's not just Price. I think Price was the most surprising to them

because a lot of the other members of the Cabinet that have done this as well didn't

come from Congress. Price was there for the ethics wars of the last 10 years.

He was there when Congress cracked down on private plane usage.

So the thing that I heard the most from lawmakers, including Republicans, this week is

they were just amazed at how bad of a decision it was to do that, and I think that's why

there wasn't really a lot of people defending Tom Price this week.

It's just not very defensible, particularly when you think of the broader point that the

president also campaigned on: "Drain the swamp."

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: I think in this case I think - I think about what Jeff just said and

this idea that you have a Cabinet that's filled with people who are wealthy. You think of

Betsy DeVos. She has her own private plane. She's footing the bill for all her flights.

But Tom Price is probably looking at her, saying, well, if she can do something, I can

also kind of keep up with the Joneses in this Cabinet.

And there's this feeling among - I would say among Capitol Hill, but also among Trump's

base that they voted in a billionaire, so that when they - when people are asking voters

about Mar-a-Lago and asking about his flights and asking about the fact that he's - that

he supposedly called the White House a dump, people kind of laugh that off and say, well,

we know we voted for a billionaire. In this case, though, you see a president saying,

OK, I'm the billionaire, OK, I might have the brand of kind of over the top, but I

don't want any of that, I don't want any of those headlines actually going to

my administration. And that's why I think Tom Price lost his job.

JEFF ZELENY: And I was told one thing that even infuriated the president more was when

Tom Price on Thursday evening said I will do an unprecedented act.

He went on Fox News with Bret Baier and said I'll do an unprecedented act of paying

$52,000 for my seat on these flights. But that doesn't even begin to cover the jet fuel.

So I'm told the president found that even more hypocritical and more sort of Washington,

if you will, and that actually hurt his case, not made it.

MICHAEL SCHERER: One other storyline to keep eyes on here is that this is yet another

employee of the president he has thrown under the bus.

Now, I'm not defending what Price did, but it wasn't illegal what Price did. And -

ROBERT COSTA: These were approved trips.

MICHAEL SCHERER: Yeah, these were approved trips. And so once again - and we seem

to have this every three weeks - when Sessions was, you know, taken to the woodshed

before, Priebus is out, Bannon is out - the president is able to just push aside

people who work for him. And I think there's going to be, over time, an effect of

that because everyone who works for the president knows they are just an employee,

and depending on the day of the week they could be gone the next day.

ROBERT COSTA: And the House Oversight Committee is looking into all of this.

SUSAN DAVIS: Yeah, they are, and they want answers.

I mean, Ron Wyden, who's the Democrat - the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee,

said Tom Price being done isn't good enough, we want a full accounting of what taxpayer

dollars were used. And I think, as you referenced, other members of the Cabinet

have done so as well. They're going to want to know more.

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: And I should say I think that this - we talk about - a lot of times

about the Cabinet and the administration being in chaos.

I think this kind of plays well for this president. This looks to a lot of people

like, oh, the president's looking at this and looking at this person who started

acting, quote/unquote, "swampy." And so, you know what, I'm not dealing with this.

So I think when we go - when he goes out to his base in the next rally we see him at,

he's going to reference this possibly and say, you know what, you voted me in to do a job

and I'm trying to make sure that there are people here that understand that the

taxpayers' dollars are important.

ROBERT COSTA: And this is a story of journalism as well. POLITICO did great reporting

on this, and you just - the stories just keep breaking at so many news organizations.

The Veterans Affairs secretary went to Wimbledon tournament as part of an official trip,

sightseeing in July. We saw with Pruitt his trip on a plane, Ryan Zinke, it goes on and on.

We're going to leave it there, though, with Secretary Price and we're going to turn to

Puerto Rico, because it has been nine days since Hurricane Maria slammed into the island

and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Since then, residents have struggled to survive without

electricity, clean water, and a serious shortage of food and medicine.

On Thursday, President Trump waived a restriction on foreign ships delivering cargo to

Puerto Rico, but washed-out bridges and roads are making it difficult to deliver supplies

from the ports in San Juan.

The sluggish response is in contrast to the president's praise of FEMA relief efforts on

the island, raising questions about the administration's crisis management.

Yamiche, reading every story about Puerto Rico, you're just struck that, one, we don't

know the extent of this tragedy; and, two, that these are Americans.

And not everyone's talking about Puerto Rico in those terms, but it's so important to

remember these are Americans and they're in a lot of trouble.

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: It's super important to remember that these are Americans because the

last time we had a very big tragedy which - connected to a hurricane, you think about

Hurricane Katrina and the fact that so many people got upset because we started calling

Americans refugees when they started going to other states. Who are these people, how

are they going to deal with it? And a lot of that had to deal with people feeling as

though they were not being treated the same way because of the color of their skin.

Here you have Puerto Rico, which is also an island filled with people of color, and

people are saying, look, this cannot be another Katrina for the president.

Democrats, I think, are already starting to seize on that messaging, saying this is

President Trump's Katrina. I think as a reporter it's a little too early to say that.

But there are the images of - coming out of Puerto Rico very much mirror the images of

Katrina. I think what made Katrina, I guess, defining for President Bush was two things.

One, you had reporters really doing these kind of fiery interviews with FEMA, where

people just - officials just seemed to not know anything. And then, two, you had

stories of people who started dying as they were waiting for aid. And I think that

that's something that's going to really turn this story into a Katrina if that happens.

ROBERT COSTA: And when we try to answer the question is this the Katrina for President

Trump, Jeff, it really comes down to the perspective of the person answering the question.

And you had the mayor of San Juan, Carmen Cruz, say this is not a good news story.

But then Elaine Duke, the acting head of the Department of Homeland Security said it is a

good news story because there have been limited deaths. There have been 16 deaths - at

least 16 deaths. How's this playing out inside the White House?

They keep saying everything's going well.

JEFF ZELENY: They do, but what the White House is saying, the words do not match the

images on the screen. And we know that the president watches these images a lot.

So I think a couple things. One, as we, you know, enter the 9th, 10th day of this,

he - the president is planning on visiting Puerto Rico next week if he's able to get

down there. I think a couple things. A president's attention and a president's

megaphone is unique. They can focus attention through donations, through other things.

For several days - he was in the U.N. last week and then he was talking about football.

So he says he was not distracted. Of course, you can do many things at once.

But the attention of the president was, indeed, distracted because he was not using his

voice to talk about Puerto Rico. So I do think now their full attention is on this.

Yes, there are many problems with Puerto Rico, even on a sunny day - no doubt about this.

But there a huge issue here going on. And it's important to point out, it's an

acting secretary of Homeland Security. This government is still not filled. There

are undersecretaries still not in position. I think that's a very important problem.

MICHAEL SCHERER: I think the important contrast, when you're talking about leadership,

is how much focus President Trump put on preparing for getting in front of cameras,

telling people about, and then showing - the White House released photos of these

meetings at Camp David or in the Situation Room, that he was on top of the issues in

Texas and in Florida, two states that just happened to be filled with Republicans, his

voters, very politically important to him. I think UNGA got in the way, but it is

striking that it was only Monday - like we went through that whole weekend of him

going to Alabama, talking there, him starting this dust-up about the NFL.

Whether the government was working or not, it is undeniable that the president approached

this third hurricane differently than the first two.

ROBERT COSTA: And, Sue, when you think about Capitol Hill, Speaker Ryan's been engaged

on this, Senator Rubio of Florida.

Can we expect the resources to be provided to Puerto Rico later this year in the budget?

SUSAN DAVIS: Absolutely. And I think that it's important to remember that even

pre-Puerto Rico, Hurricane Maria, there were already estimates that the recovery

efforts for the hurricanes in Florida and Texas could run as high as $150 billion.

That was before Puerto Rico. And now all Congress has appropriated so far is about

$15 billion. So it's going to cost a lot more money to repair not just Puerto Rico,

but all these areas that have been devastated by these hurricanes.

ROBERT COSTA: We wish everyone in Puerto Rico the best as you all struggle through this

horrible situation. Our thoughts are with you.

We're going to move now to Washington because, as all of this unfolded in Puerto Rico,

the president was rolling out the new Republican tax plan. He calls

it revolutionary, promising it will benefit the middle class. The new proposal

calls for lowering the corporate tax rate from 35 to 20 percent, doubling the

standard deduction, boosting the child tax credit, and eliminating the estate tax.

There were few details in this tax plan blueprint, so we don't know how much it will cost

and exactly who will benefit, or how the government will make up for the trillions of

dollars lost in tax revenue that will, of course, add to the national deficit.

There was a lot of confidence on the Republican side, Yamiche, this week about this

plan, but are Democrats like Senator Donnelly of Indiana, who are facing tough

reelections in states won by President Trump, are they going to come along on this tax plan?

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: My conversation with a lot of congressional aides, Democratic,

moderate, I would say, congressional aides tell me that Democrats are not prepared to

back this tax reform or this tax legislation because they don't feel as though they've

been really engaged from the very beginning. And of course, Democrats really want

this to go through regular order, which is not what's going to happen - at least

that's not what Republicans want to happen. So from my - from all the conversations

I've been having this week Democrats are not feeling like they want to do this.

I looked at some surveys about - from bipartisan groups who said that something between

30 percent of people who are making somewhere between 50,000 (dollars) and 150,000

(dollars) would see a tax increase. That means that that's essentially the heart

of the middle class, about 30 percent of people, that might see their taxes go up. That's

a real problem for Democrats. And I would say, that's a real problem for Republicans.

ROBERT COSTA: Sue, when you think about this plan, it's just that. It's a plan.

We haven't seen a bill yet. So does that throw a little cold water on the idea

that taxes - it's going to be easy for the Republicans to pass?

SUSAN DAVIS: You know, they had a really good week in terms - there's been a lot of bad

weeks for the Republican majority. This was a good week. The initial reaction

to this blueprint from the people that they want to like it, they like it.

The House Freedom Caucus, conservatives in the House liked it, their allies in the

business community say they like it. But this was the candy, right?

This was all the good news. The actual legislation is going to have all the broccoli.

And let's see what that is and how - and how it progresses.

It's certainly, probably, going to fall apart many times before it come together.

The thing I would say, though, is that this is a Republican Party in control of

Washington. And this is a tax cut. This should be the easiest thing they are able to do.

And that is why I think there is so much political momentum behind this, because -

particularly following that failure on health care - the sort of psychology of Capitol

Hill right now is, man, if we can't pass a tax cut we are in trouble.

ROBERT COSTA: Although run on, Jeff, maybe as the confirmation of Judge Gorsuch on the

Supreme Court, they need this.

JEFF ZELENY: They need this, no question. Everyone who's on the ballot in 2018, every

Republican, needs to go back to their districts and say: Look, we at least did this.

But I think that they're - my big question is, as I sit at the White House and watch all

this sort of both sides of Pennsylvania Avenue, what will the president's involvement in

this be? And there's not an easy answer to that.

Some people on the Hill would like him to sort of stay out of it, because when he gets

involved in the - sort of the details of this, it could muck things up.

But there are still, you know, a big unanswered question. The biggest thing is,

how will this benefit the wealthiest Americans? The president has not released his

tax returns yet, as we know. You'll hear many cries for that. He won't do it, obviously.

But how will it benefit the wealthiest of Americans? And this is still a fight, I think.

We'll see if Congress is functional, even being able to do this.

But Sue's right, if a Republican majority cannot get tax cuts through, what can it do?

MICHAEL SCHERER: I think the biggest challenge they're going to have gets to your point,

which is that there's a tension between what the president has said this plan does and

what this plan actually does. He has said this is a populist plan that's going to

lift up the middle class. This is a classic Republican plan that gives huge cuts to

the wealthiest Americans. And over time, as the country debates this, that difference

between those two different visions is going to become very clear to the American

people and it's going to make this politically very difficult.

ROBERT COSTA: The president, Yamiche, seems to not even like the 20 percent rate for the

corporations. He'd rather see 15 percent. So it comes to Jeff's point, is he

really going to sell a plan that was cobbled together on Capitol Hill?

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: I think in some ways, yes, he might say that he wants that.

But I think when you think about what his brand is going to be, and 2018 is going to be

all about Donald Trump. I've been talking to congressional aides, as I'm sure everyone

else is. Donald Trump's going to be on the ballot, even if his name isn't on the ballot.

If he can't put together a win, he can only get away with that for so long.

What is he going to say in 2020 if he says: We couldn't do health care, we couldn't do

tax cuts, my infrastructure plan has not been written yet. What does the president

have to say if he's going to go and stump in 2018? So I think - I think in some ways

it's going to be like health care. He might want a bunch of different things. If

Republicans say we have the votes to pass this, I think he's going to be ready to sign it.

ROBERT COSTA: Sue, what's the mood among conservatives on Capitol Hill?

They have a child tax credit as part of this plan, which has not always been celebrated

by some of the more conservative media organs, because it complicates the code in their

view. Is this - is that going to stay?

SUSAN DAVIS: That's a great question. I think it goes to Michael's point about

the promises that the president's making about the tax bill and the reality of it.

And one of the things that I think that Republicans in Congress are nervous about is they

do want to be able to go home and say: This helps the middle class. And the child

tax credit is one of those things that is the most obvious ways to help families.

And so I think that that is where we're seeing maybe the clash come in, is that so far

what we understand it does tend to benefit wealthier Americans.

And there's going to be a push to sort of push some of that benefit down the tax code.

ROBERT COSTA: Speaking about what makes Republicans nervous on Capitol Hill, Alabama

voters handed another setback to President Trump this week. His pick in the

Republican primary for U.S. Senate in Alabama was defeated by Judge Roy Moore.

The controversial, ultra-conservative judge beat incumbent Senator Luther Strange who had

been appointed earlier in the year to fill the attorney general's seat, Jeff Sessions.

Many Republican lawmakers in Washington are concerned about Moore's fire and brimstone

beliefs, including his belief that God is the only source of law.

Michael, no one spent more time with Roy Moore, at least in the last few weeks, than you.

How much of a burden will he be for Republicans this fall and in 2018?

MICHAEL SCHERER: This fall I don't think he's going to disrupt much. I think he's

got a pretty clear path to winning election. The burden will come in one of two ways.

One, he'll be used during campaigns as a way of branding the Republican Party, sort of

like Todd Akin was used years back for his comments - unfortunate comments about rape.

And second, when he gets to Washington, assuming he wins, he is going to cause problems

for everybody. That is his modus operandi. That's why he wants to be here.

He wants to stand up for what he sees as the divine truth of this country.

ROBERT COSTA: You don't - you don't see, Michael, though, a chance for the Democrat,

Doug Jones? He's a former U.S. attorney. He's closing in in the polls.

MICHAEL SCHERER: He'd have a great chance if it wasn't Alabama.

This is a state that went for Donald Trump more than just about any other state, and the

path Jones now has to walk is he has to run to the center. He can't run against

Roy Moore. Roy Moore has been elected statewide twice as judge.

He's got to run to the center as a moderate, and it's going to be tough for Doug Jones

running as a moderate to really get the base out in Alabama in a - in a place where the

math just isn't there. I'm not saying I'm ruling it out, it's just going to be difficult.

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: I talked to some congressional aides on the Democratic side and they

said that Doug Jones has about a 10 percent chance of winning.

So even Democrats, as they're hoping and praying that maybe the party can put some money

into this race, they don't at all think that he can win in -

ROBERT COSTA: Ten percent? I'm going to - that's pretty low. (Laughter.) Sue, this was

not just a loss for Luther Strange, this was a loss for Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

SUSAN DAVIS: Yes, it was.

And I think if you are the conservative grassroots, if you're Steve Bannon, who helped

play a role in this race, this was a roadmap for how to run Republican primaries in 2018.

And I think that they see that roadmap as make it a referendum on Mitch McConnell - in a

Republican primary, not in the general - but that Mitch McConnell has never really been

super popular, but is now deeply unpopular with Republicans. And that is in some

part due to President Trump, who has attacked the majority leader. And they clearly -

and I think we're going to see this roadmap play out in races like Arizona, in Nevada.

And Mitch McConnell very successfully in the last two election cycles beat back every

insurgent challenge in every Republican primary.

We're going to see if he can still do it again.

ROBERT COSTA: I remember writing that story in 2014, the return of the establishment.

But, Jeff, are we going to see Bannon go into Nevada and against Senator Roger Wicker in

Mississippi and so many other states?

JEFF ZELENY: I think some of them. He's definitely going to go out and scout and

see what's available. There are only so many Roy Moores.

I mean, I think he is a unique figure in the sense that he has run so many times before.

So I do not think Steve Bannon, you know, despite all of his efforts will be able to find

someone to replicate that. But it's trouble, no doubt about it. I mean, Senator

McConnell's winning streak is now broken. And the big question is, what does the

president do here? And, you know, the president, for all his dislike and distaste

for President Obama, he saw exactly the limits of the office, the limits of endorsements.

So I'm not sure any endorsements that President Trump has on these candidates will make a

difference or not.

ROBERT COSTA: That's why, Michael, I found this race so fascinating.

The Trump voter in Alabama, still in spirt with the president, still like the president,

but they don't take direction from the president.

MICHAEL SCHERER: That's right. And not only that, the Trump voter in Alabama deeply

loves the president. It's not just that they kind of say they support him or approve

of the job he's doing; they voted for the guy he said not to vote for in his spirit.

They were doing what they thought Trump really wanted, even if Trump was saying something

different. And towards the end, you know, Trump was giving winks and nods enough to

basically give them permission.

ROBERT COSTA: He said I made a mistake, I might have made a mistake.

MICHAEL SCHERER: I might have made a mistake.

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: He did delete his tweets.

SUSAN DAVIS: And then he deleted his tweets! (Laughter.)

JEFF ZELENY: And he said I'll campaign for Roy Moore - before the election he said that.

MICHAEL SCHERER: And he allowed Steve Bannon, who he has a tense relationship with, to

go out and say a vote for Roy Moore is a vote for Donald Trump, and Trump said nothing.

Trump knew that happened the day before the election. Trump just let it happen

and never said, wait a minute, I'm actually endorsing Luther Strange.

YAMICHE ALCINDOR: The only thing I would say is that Alabama is Alabama. So goes

Alabama does not mean so goes the nation. So I think that we're not talking about Nevada or -

I don't even know another state that isn't the same. So I think that Alabama's a special case.

ROBERT COSTA: It's a special case. Always love going down there as a reporter,

and I think this race will maybe say a lot about 2018.

But, Yamiche, you may be right; maybe it's just Alabama.

We're going to have to leave it there because, finally, before we go tonight, we want to

take note of a bipartisan moment, quite a moment in Congress this week: Majority Whip

Steve Scalise walked back onto the House floor for the first time since being shot 15

weeks ago. His colleagues, Democrats and Republicans alike, greeted Scalise with a

standing ovation, hugs, and of course many well wishes. As Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi

put it, everyone in Congress and across the country is on Team Scalise.

Welcome back, Congressman. See you for a story in Louisiana soon I'm sure.

Our conversation for now will continue online on the Washington Week Extra, where we'll

talk about the debate over NFL players taking a knee in protest.

Many of our viewers shared their thoughts, and we'll bring you into the discussion about

the protests and talk about patriotism. You can find that after 10 p.m. Friday night

and all weekend long at PBS.org/WashingtonWeek. I'm Robert Costa. Have a great weekend.

For more infomation >> HHS Secretary Tom Price resigns and Puerto Rico slowly responds after hurricane - Duration: 24:26.

-------------------------------------------

Fact Check: Will the wealthy get a tax cut under President Trump's plan? - Duration: 1:42.

Will the wealthy get a tax cut or not?

The wealthy are not getting a tax cut under our plan.

And it's not good for me— believe me.

The thing to remember about

taxes is that the people who pay most of the taxes are the wealthiest Americans.

Here the figures:

The top 10% of taxpayers pay 80% of individual federal taxes.

And the top 20% pay almost 95%.

For many Americans,

particularly the middle-class payroll taxes — taxes you pay for Social Security

or Medicare — are going to be much larger than the individual income taxes you

might pay. But President Trump isn't planning to deal with the payroll taxes

he wants to cut individual taxes.

Now President Trump does say that he would

like to eliminate deductions that mainly benefit the rich.

But a lot of those

deductions such as the mortgage deduction also benefit the middle class.

One other big problem for the president is that he has plans

to eliminate the estate tax.

But the estate tax only effects estates larger

than 11 million dollars.

The best way to cut taxes for middle-class Americans is to

have the kind of targeted tax cuts that many politicians say have already

cluttered up the tax code.

Unless tax cuts are specifically

targeted to the middle-class — which is hard to do — the rich will end up getting

the biggest share of virtually any kind of tax cut.

For more infomation >> Fact Check: Will the wealthy get a tax cut under President Trump's plan? - Duration: 1:42.

-------------------------------------------

USC vs. Washington State Live Stream: How to Watch Without Cable | SML News - Duration: 8:49.

USC vs. Washington State Live Stream: How to Watch Without Cable

The best college football game of the week may not even happen on Saturday, as No.

5 USC travels to Pullman to take on No.

16 Washington State in a crucial early Pac-12 matchup on Friday night.

The game is scheduled to start at 10:30 p.m.

ET and will be broadcast on ESPN, which means one thing: Pac-12 After Dark.

If you don't have cable or can't get to a TV, you can watch a live stream of the game via one of the following over-the-top streaming services:.

DirecTV Now: "Live a Little" package.

Sling TV: "Sling Orange" package.

PlayStation Vue: "Access" package.

Every one of these options includes a free trial, so you can watch the game at no cost.

You can sign up via the above links, or you can read on for a more thorough breakdown of each service and how to start watching immediately:.

DirecTV Now.

ESPN and ESPN 2 are both included in DirecTV Now's "Live a Little" bundle at $35 per month.

Here's a rundown:.

Total Channels Included: 60-plus, depending on local channels available.

You can find the complete channel list right here.

Price: $35 per month.

Extras: Watch on two different devices at the same time; DVR is in Beta stage; can sign in to WatchESPN app with DirecTV Now credentials.

Free Trial: 7 days.

How to Sign Up & Watch:.

1. Click here to go to the DirecTV Now website.

Click on "Start your free trial now" and then create an account.

Select the channel package you want and enter your payment information.

If you cancel your subscription within seven days of signing up, you will not be charged.

Return to the DirecTV Now website to start watching ESPN on your desktop.

You can also watch on your phone, tablet or streaming device via the DirecTV Now app, which is free to download.

A complete list of compatible devices can be found here.

Sling TV.

ESPN and ESPN 2 are both included in Sling TV's "Sling Orange" bundle at $20 per month.

Here's a rundown:.

Total Channels Included: 25-plus, depending on local channels available.

You can find the complete channel list right here.

Price: $20 per month.

Extras: Watch on one different device at once; 50 hours of cloud DVR is $5 per month extra; Can sign in to WatchESPN app with Sling credentials.

Free Trial: 7 days.

How to Sign Up & Watch:.

1. Click here to go to the Sling TV website.

Click on "Watch Now 7 Days Free" and then create an account.

Select the channel package you want and enter your payment information.

If you cancel your subscription within seven days of signing up, you will not be charged.

Go to the Sling TV website and navigate to ESPN to start watching.

You can also watch on your phone, tablet or streaming device via the Sling TV app, which is free to download.

A full list of compatible devices can be found here.

PlayStation Vue.

ESPN and ESPN 2 are both included in PlayStation Vue's "Access" bundle at $39.99.

Here's a rundown:.

Total Channels Included: 40-plus, depending on local channels available.

You can find the complete channel list here.

Price: $39. 99 per month.

Extras: Watch on five different devices at once; cloud DVR (restrictions with certain channels); Can sign in to WatchESPN app with PS Vue credentials.

Free Trial: 5 days.

How to Sign Up & Watch:.

1. Click here to go to the PlayStation Vue website.

Click on "Start Free Trial" and then create an account.

Select the channel package you want and enter your payment information.

If you cancel your subscription within seven days of signing up, you will not be charged.

Return to the PlayStation Vue website to start watching ESPN on your desktop.

You can also watch on your phone, tablet or streaming device via the PlayStation Vue app, which is free to download.

A complete list of compatible devices can be found here.

For more infomation >> USC vs. Washington State Live Stream: How to Watch Without Cable | SML News - Duration: 8:49.

-------------------------------------------

Florida man arrested, charged with multiple child sex crimes out of Washington County, Va. - Duration: 0:27.

For more infomation >> Florida man arrested, charged with multiple child sex crimes out of Washington County, Va. - Duration: 0:27.

-------------------------------------------

Majority of Washington residents targets of scam attacks - Duration: 3:00.

For more infomation >> Majority of Washington residents targets of scam attacks - Duration: 3:00.

-------------------------------------------

Premier Wynne Visits Washington, D.C. Ahead of NAFTA Negotiations - Duration: 0:48.

[Music]

PREMIER WYNNE >> I've been spending a lot of time focused on NAFTA, and making the case

for free trade to our U.S. partners.

The benefits of free trade between Canada and the U.S. are real, and the benefits are

shared.

Since January, I've met with or had phone calls with over 25 governors, some of whom

I've spoken with many times.

I want to talk about our common objectives of growth, of fairness, and good jobs in a

competitive economy.

That is what we're all looking for.

Free trade is essential to the success of your businesses, your workers, and our collective

competitiveness as a continent.

There is just no question that free trade has been a net good for our people.

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét