Thứ Bảy, 26 tháng 5, 2018

News on Youtube May 27 2018

Frail Hillary Clinton Has Medical Episode in Public

During the 2016 election, liberals claimed that Donald Trump was sexist for claiming

that Hillary Clinton was secretly sick with a mysterious condition that she was hiding

from the American people.

Now, however, a new piece of footage of a frail-looking Clinton has emerged that indicates

that Trump may have been right about her all along.

Western Journal reported that Clinton had to be helped up a step by New York Governor

Chris Cuomo this week during an event in which she endorsed him in his raise against actress

Cynthia Nixon.

Though she was only climbing up one step, it appeared to be quite an ordeal for Clinton.

This comes after Clinton was spotted wearing what looked like a back brace as she walked

around New York City and made an appearance in Australia

Speculation has been running rampant on social media about what exactly Clinton is hiding

on her back.

"Before that she was wearing a cast on her arm and before that she was wearing a boot.

Is Hillary falling apart before our eyes?" one social media user wrote.

"Hillary Clinton spotted wearing yet another massive scarf after earlier photos showed

she might be trying to hide a back brace," another person commented.

Clinton has a documented list of bizarre injuries she has suffered in the past few years.

Five months ago, she broke her toe during a fall in London.

In an interview right afterwards during which she wore a surgical boot, Clinton tried to

downplay the injury with a convoluted story about it.

"I was running down the stairs in heels with a cup of coffee in hand, I was talking

over my shoulder and my heel caught and I fell backwards," she explained in the interview.

"I tried to get up and it really hurt.

I've broken my toe."

Clinton was caught on camera collapsing during her campaign as she left the 9/11 Memorial

in New York City.

She later claimed that she had been diagnosed with dehydration and pneumonia.

What do you think is going on here?

Let us know your thoughts

in the

comments section.

For more infomation >> Frail Hillary Clinton Has Medical Episode in Public - Duration: 10:13.

-------------------------------------------

Doing My Makeup in Public Spa Changing Room! (Massive Fail) + Zara & Bershka Haul! | GRWM | Part 2 - Duration: 14:49.

hey guys my name is Anyeka Jamal and welcome to my channel this video is a

getting ready in the spa dressing rooms video is the part two of the last video

that I uploaded and yes so I also have a hole at the end of this video that my

best friend does that I mentioned in part 1 of this video so let's get right

into it so at the moment I'm just going to prep my skin I just put contact

solution in my eyes because we just went swimming and my eyes need rejuvenating I

also want to mention that my skin looks very very red because of the atmosphere

of the dressing rooms is extremely humid and my face and the foundation itself

went on extremely patchy this was pretty much a disaster all the way through but

the end product it was alright it looked alright but yeah I just basically did my

base I used at the NARS foundation it doesn't normally look this bad and then

I went over the concealing areas with two different concealers and it just

looks extremely extremely extremely patchy some of this video is a voiceover

and some of it isn't but I did just go over my concealer with a powder brighten

up powder by essence and I'm telling you that thing saved my life it was amazing

I'm also using the new Smashbox palette and it's okay it's not amazing but I do

like most of the colors and the items that went into it I also loved the

concept of it's everything that you'll ever need in one place and I'm using

basically all of the products the highlight is really good the blush is

really good the bronzers could be a bit better but it's it's a decent product

it's worth it I think it's coming off because oh yeah

how's it looking really weird enough

so a trick is going over any areas with the beauty blender with a tiny amount of

product on it already and then setting it with powder again and I try to do

that sometimes it works sometimes it didn't but the at the end it was all

alright but I'm just using the spice lip liner at the moment and I have these

cute little minis in my makeup bag from colour-pop and that's what I used on my

lips I also had to continuously powder my face and neck because the reoccurring

theme is that it's really hard but yeah and I used the models own palette I

basically just used some of the warm tones to warm up my crease and add a bit

of color and dimension back into my face you look great

do you have a spray

discuss your swing you really want it oh yeah important

that's not actually a family can vote lucious you put it in there this is so

come here so come just you got that Patrice nothing

how did you get that and you know how I got it I got it from Amazon second time

I got it I got it from this website called coffee dream which and it was

really cheap on that the coffee trees one if you want to get it from them

wait to committed come on

is it really good so right it's not as amazing the wait wasn't ready to help

why do you like it

I'm just like sway from juicy yeah nari try imagine why

I think

I like to discover

22 really but they call comfortable now is the

formula different this is like this yeah this was not the place than this was

after

my face is just gonna melt off again I need a plug

there's nothing

these are so I should do what's in my makeup bag video why'd you put this I

can't believe you got this yeah that was free

what yeah man I told you about that so pretty

you really like this no it's okay why did you buy the full version to see

it because I want you to try it with you

do you like it it's good but it's not amazing

you see I love that you know the the the bomb one yeah I don't like that

I don't mind that I like the other hand the brush is really good it's not the

brush it's like the staying power like a movie are you gonna wear

you do with your head where did you brush it it will go in for me

I look like an old lady a three-pound was still really cute

I used to get the colour-pop ones but won't piss me off

the black ones just come out of the tubes it does come over here so I like

the because it's so pigmented and even though it's the sticky one it's still do

you cry out I do I like that side of the formula everything is okay way a fool is

out like and it just feels like such a waste of money because fair enough it's

cute but you need to at least buddy you know like stay in the tree this is

by far not a makeup tutorial it's more of a watch me fail doing my makeup in a

spa dressing room but yeah I'm just tight lining my eyes with elf

eyeliner at the moment and then I went back in with that powder and a dry

Beauty Blender and I'm telling you this worked like a charm

that powder is amazing

we should be fresh what kind of big burst you want my face brush - cool -

bronzer is this only in Wilko yeah yeah always wanted to go in with the

darker shade so I just took the shade from colour-pop and then I noticed that

there was a giant blob on my face so I tried to get rid of that and blend that

all in and then I went back in with bronzers and whatnot just to brighten

the rest of my face because I felt like it wasn't like done properly and this

kind of corrected everything and blended everything in and made sure it was all

seamless and I didn't and this is me trying

I couldn't find a plug so I couldn't use my pry Mike 8-pound kyla which is very

good by the way but yeah I just tied up the top half of my hair and poofed it up

a bit with my hands and then I still felt like it was extremely frizzy so

this oil is from super drugs and it's a mixture of certain oils and I actually

really liked it it solved the problem of the fifth of the frizziness and I think

it did an alright job for the rest of the day

we finally made it after all de

like sweat

sorry bashful

because I'm obsessed with game

widely I saw this girl wearing and when I saw her she was very like in a

different color I just wanted a black

yeah just

extra small d liam go up my thighs life I've allowed be really nice in the waist

you're gonna get crazy

yes Oh got these trousers I mean

funny you could figure right now you love it

if I can really nice like type of material

she's worried that they were gonna be too long but yeah hopefully

hopefully when I get home so much money

dressed like I saw this online and so on and I was like an evil must have things

in my wardrobe so he's obsessed with blood orange and

the back

I think it was really nice nedra and stylish learner it does yeah

it's really really nice and it was United

what it is they came with a skirt as well

Oh

it's it's regulated

not have to

I spent a lot like

subscribe joy rich emollient

we need to take over

hit the bell icon as well so get every notification

For more infomation >> Doing My Makeup in Public Spa Changing Room! (Massive Fail) + Zara & Bershka Haul! | GRWM | Part 2 - Duration: 14:49.

-------------------------------------------

Could fleets of self-driving cars become a public health concern? - Duration: 3:40.

When it comes to autonomous and self-driving vehicles, they are perched up on a pedestal

as being the future and a major solution to environmental and public transportation woes,

mainly in the name of safety, reducing traffic congestion, and ultimately reducing a city's

carbon footprint.

But how about associating autonomous and self-driving vehicles as a health, safety, and sanitary

issue?

When it comes to autonomous and self-driving vehicles meant for fleet purposes, such as

potentially replacing traditional drivers in the world of taxicabs and ridesharing,

cleanliness of these vehicles could become a major issue, according to Slate.

It's hard to deny that even today, taxicabs, Ubers, and even Lyfts, can have questionable

levels of cleanliness already, so this concern isn't unfounded as an emerging form of public

transportation suffering from growing pains.

Anyone who's utilized public transportation in any form in any major metropolitan area

knows that even current methods of transportation present major public health challenges.

When it comes to shuttling thousands, if not millions of people, on a regular basis from

point A to point B, it's inevitable things will get dirtied up just by the usual flow

of people by massive amounts of volume.

That, of course, makes it a public health concern, especially when it comes to the control

of pathogens and disease, among many other human health concerns when a mass of bodies

converges in a single, confined space.

From those trying to get the local health clinic for assistance and those who get promiscuous

after a late night of drinking.

You get the idea, which is why it's always good to wash your hands after using public

transportation.

Thankfully, there is usually a dedicated maintenance team that helps keep things as clean as possible

according to health department and commercial policy requirements.

But that can range from a multi-person housekeeping staff for subway cars to just a single driver

of a taxicab, both of which you hope would keep the seats stain-free and sanitized.

And everyone's idea of clean varies, greatly.

So it is without a doubt that cleanliness will be a public health concern for self-driving

cars.

Removing the driver also removes the human element who is expected to maintain cleanliness.

But this isn't to say there aren't any solutions.

Most taxicab and livery fleets usually get cleaned up regularly when they're parked

at home base and throughout the day.

Additionally, lots of taxi and hire fleets feature special antimicrobial seat covers

to simplify maintenance.

With self-driving vehicles, the driver might not be present to keep these things clean.

So it will be important for the automakers of self-driving vehicles to incorporate quality,

health-conscious designs and materials while it's up to fleet operators to maintain a

cleaning regiment.

For more infomation >> Could fleets of self-driving cars become a public health concern? - Duration: 3:40.

-------------------------------------------

After Over 5 Years, the TRUTH About Sandy Hook Goes Public – Obama Panicking - Duration: 11:03.

After Over 5 Years, the TRUTH About Sandy Hook Goes Public – Obama Panicking

It has just been revealed that former Obama White House officials discussed how to best

exploit the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School for their own gun control agenda before

the victims were even buried.

Breitbart reported that a Freedom of Information Act request by the Baltimore Post confirmed

that this strategizing took place between Obama Education Secretary Arne Duncan and

Chicago Mayor, former Obama White House Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel (D).

The following email threat between Duncan and Emanuel was written on December 16, 2012:

At 6:57PM EST on December 16, 2012, Duncan wrote to Emanuel in a message titled "CT

shootings."

Duncan asked the Chicago mayor, "What are your thoughts?"

Five minutes later, Emanuel responded, "Go for a vote this week before it fades.

Tap peoples emotion.

Make it simple assault weapons."

Duncan responded immediately, "Yup- thanks."

"When I did brady bill and assault weapons for clinton we always made it simple.

Criminals or war weapons," Emanuel said in the email to Duncan.

"Gun show loophole?"

Duncan responded.

"Database?

Cop-killer bullets?

Too complicated?" he said.

"Cop killer maybe," Emanuel responded.

"The other no."

The exchange ended when Duncan concluded with, "Got it."

The threat clearly shows that Duncan was trying to ensure the gun control push was tailored

to appeal to Americans when their hearts were broken over the heinous shooting.

The Obama administration conveniently overlooked the fact that Connecticut had the 5th most

stringent gun controls in the country at the time of the shooting, that the guns the attacker

used were stolen, and that the attack occurred in a gun-free zone.

Emanuel pretty much summed up the mentality of the Obama administration when he said,

"You never want a serious crisis to go to waste."

It's sick that Obama consciously and shamelessly used this tragedy for his own personal gain.

SHARE this story so we can expose what

he did!

For more infomation >> After Over 5 Years, the TRUTH About Sandy Hook Goes Public – Obama Panicking - Duration: 11:03.

-------------------------------------------

Public Transport in Munich - Duration: 6:27.

For more infomation >> Public Transport in Munich - Duration: 6:27.

-------------------------------------------

Vermont State Police warn to lock your car in public places - Duration: 1:29.

For more infomation >> Vermont State Police warn to lock your car in public places - Duration: 1:29.

-------------------------------------------

WISN 12 Editorial: Children, cities depend on future of public education - Duration: 1:29.

For more infomation >> WISN 12 Editorial: Children, cities depend on future of public education - Duration: 1:29.

-------------------------------------------

Omaha Public Library start off summer reading programs - Duration: 2:53.

For more infomation >> Omaha Public Library start off summer reading programs - Duration: 2:53.

-------------------------------------------

Episode 1147 | The Line: NM's Public Education Department And Failing Schools - Duration: 10:49.

>> HAS THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OVERSTEPPED ITS

AUTHORITY IN WORKING WITH NEW MEXICO'S MOST TROUBLED

SCHOOLS?

THAT IS THE QUESTION THE BIPARTISAN LEGISLATIVE

EDUCATION STUDY COMMITTEE IS NOW ASKING.

AT ISSUE ARE FOUR ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS, THREE HERE IN

ALBUQUERQUE, THAT HAVE RECEIVED F GRADES FOR THE LAST

FIVE TO SIX YEARS.

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICIALS SAY THEY HAVE THE

RIGHT TO INTERVENE IN THOSE SCHOOLS' OPERATIONS BASED ON

THE FEDERAL EVERY SCHOOL SUCCEEDS ACT PASSED BY

PRESIDENT OBAMA IN 2015 BUT THE LESC SAYS THE STATE

STATUTE IS NOT CLEAR ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT THE PED CAN

HAVE FINAL SAY ON ANY INTERVENTION PLANS.

MARY, AND THIS IS VERY INTERESTING BECAUSE VERY

SPECIFICALLY TO APS, A LOT OF BACK AND FORTH OVER THE PAST

COUPLE OF MONTHS ABOUT THESE THREE SCHOOLS.

EDUCATION DEPARTMENT TAKES A PRETTY HARD LINE.

MS.

REEDY, THE NEW APS SUPERINTENDENT, SAYING, LOOK,

WE ARE WORKING HERE, SUBMITTING THINGS ON TIME.

WHERE ARE WE NOW ON THIS ON YOUR READ?

ARE WE GOING TO HAVE RESOLUTION HERE?

>> I DON'T KNOW, MAYBE.

I THINK WHERE ARE WE NOW, WE HAVE A LOT OF QUESTIONS IN THE

AIR BECAUSE WE ARE COMING TO THE END OF THE MARTINEZ

ADMINISTRATION.

SO ESTABLISHING A PLAN, FOLLOWING IT THROUGH INTO THE

NEXT -- INTO 2019, THE CURRENT EDUCATION SECRETARY, I MEAN,

WHO KNOWS, BUT AT LEAST I WOULD EXPECT RIGHT NOW MAY NOT

BE AROUND DEPENDING ON THE NEXT ADMINISTRATION AND ALSO,

EVEN GETTING DOWN TO THE F GRADE, ISN'T THAT IN QUESTION

IN THE GOVERNOR'S RACE?

WHO IS IN FAVOR OF THAT SORT OF GRADING SYSTEM OF THE

SCHOOLS.

TO ME A LOT OF QUESTIONS.

>> ONE OF THE BIG QUESTIONS IS WHO HAS FINAL SAY.

IS IT LOCAL SCHOOLS?

THERE IS A LOT OF ISSUES OUT THERE THAT SEEMS LIKE A BLOCK

TO PLAY WELL TOGETHER, IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT.

>> IT STRIKES ME, FIRST OF ALL STRIKES ME AS SOMETHING THAT

PROBABLY REALLY DOES NEED TO BE CLARIFIED BY THE

LEGISLATURE AND BY THE TIME THAT HAPPENS, WE ARE GOING TO

HAVE A NEW ADMINISTRATION.

SO, WILL THERE BE AN ATTEMPT TO RUN OUT THE CLOCK, I

SUSPECT SO.

>> TOM, THE IDEA THAT THESE POWER STRUGGLES, KIDS LOSE AT

THE END OF THE DAY, SEEMS TO ME.

WE HAVE THREE FAILING SCHOOLS AND PED SAID, LOOK, WE CAN DO

A LOT OF THINGS HERE BUT THE FIRST THING I WANT TO TALK

ABOUT IS REPLACE THE PRINCIPAL.

I HAVE BEEN A ROUND A LOT OF EDUCATORS, THEY WILL TELL YOU

JUST REPLACING THE PERSON AT THE TOP OF IT, THAT DOESN'T

FIX A SCHOOL NECESSARILY.

WHERE ARE THEY COMING FROM ON THE PRINCIPAL THING, SEEMS

LIKE A NO WIN THERE.

>> IT IS A SCAPEGOAT IS WHAT IT IS.

YES, APS HAS REPLACED ALL THE PRINCIPALS.

THAT IS CHECKING A BOX.

THERE IS A LARGER COMMUNITY ISSUE THAT GOES BEYOND THE

PRINCIPAL.

THE PRINCIPAL IS A LEADER AND IT IS A SMALL BUSINESS, ABOUT

A THREE MILLION BUDGET, SO IT IS UP TO THEM TO KIND OF

CHANGE THE TONE BUT, YOU KNOW, TO SAY IT IS THE PRINCIPALS,

IT IS THE TEACHERS, YOU KNOW, PERHAPS SHOULD BE MOVED.

YOU HAVE A LOT OF DIFFERENT OPTIONS AVAILABLE BUT FOR SOME

REASON PRINCIPALS IS THE EASIEST ONE, BECAUSE IT IS THE

ONE PERSON THAT IS NOT PROTECTED BY THE UNION.

BUT NOT TO MAKE IT A UNION CONVERSATION, BUT TO YOUR

CONVERSATION EARLIER ABOUT WHO HAS FINAL SAY, I THINK PED HAS

THE HAMMER AND THEY ARE THE ONES WITH FINAL SAY, BECAUSE

THEY ARE THE ONES IN CHARGE.

NOW THAT COULD CHANGE AND PROBABLY WILL CHANGE MANY

MONTHS FROM NOW, BUT, THERE IS SO MANY DIFFERENT THINGS ABOUT

THIS.

THESE ISSUES AT ALL SCHOOLS DID NOT HAPPEN OVERNIGHT.

IT WASN'T LIKE ALL OF A SUDDEN DECEMBER IS LIKE, OH MY GOSH,

WE HAVE AN F GRADE OR WHATEVER THE MEASUREMENT STICK IS.

IT HAS -- IT IS NOT WORKING.

AND YOU JUST CAN'T -- >> FIVE OR SIX YEARS IS A LONG

TIME.

>> IT IS.

WHAT APS HAS TRIED ISN'T WORKING.

WHY NOT GIVE WHAT PED IS SUGGESTING A TRY.

WHAT APS HAS TRIED TO DO IN FIXING THE ISSUE HASN'T

WORKED.

>> HOW DO YOU READ THIS ZACK?

IN THIS TENSION BETWEEN PED AND APS, WHO HAS UPPER HAND

HERE?

>> JUST TO GO FROM TOM'S POINT HERE, YOU KNOW, PED DOES HAVE

THE HAMMER AND SPEAKING OF CHECKED BOXES, TEACHER

EVALUATIONS COMPLETELY UNFAIR IN THE STATE AND THE WAY WE

ARE TESTING TO STUDENTS AND HOLDING TEACHERS TO TESTING

STUDENTS IS UNFAIR, BUT THE MAIN POINT IS I THINK THE PED

HAS TO ABIDE BY FEDERAL LAW.

WE HAVE WHAT I BELIEVE IS CALLED EVERY STUDENT SUCCEED

ACT.

IT HAS CLEAR GUIDELINES, AND LEGISLATURE SHOULD REFERENCE

THIS AND BE ABLE TO BUILD IT OUT TO THE LEVEL IT NEEDS TO

BE INTERPRETED TO.

>> MARY, I WANT TO READ THE FOUR THINGS PED SAYS THEY HAVE

IN THERE TOOL BOX.

THEY CAN CLOSE A SCHOOL.

THEY CAN RESTART IT AS A CHARTER SCHOOL.

THEY CAN CHAMPION AND PROVIDE CHOICE AND RESTRUCTURE IN

DESIGN OR THE PRINCIPAL THING.

THERE IS A LOT OF THINGS THEY ARE GIVING WIGGLE ROOM FOR THE

SCHOOLS TO DO.

THEY ARE SAYING, WE CHOOSE TO DO REDESIGN AND RESTRUCTURE,

GIVE US SOME TIME.

YOU CAN'T TURN AROUND SOMETHING THAT HAS BEEN

FAILING FIVE OR SIX YEARS IN A ROW.

IS THAT FAIR FOR MS.

REEDY TO LOOK FOR MORE TIME HERE?

>> I THINK IT IS EXPECTED THAT SHE WOULD TRY TO DO THAT

ESPECIALLY SOMETIMES THERE ARE MANY COMPLEX REASONS WHY A

SCHOOL MIGHT GET AN F GRADE.

BEYOND THE CLASSROOM.

SO, I THINK WHEN YOU START TO LOOK AT KIND OF MORE INTEGRAL

PROBLEMS OR SOCIAL ISSUES THAT ARE AT PLAY, THEN, YES, SHE IS

SOMEONE WHOSE POSITION IS CERTAINLY GOING TO WANT THAT

EXTRA TIME.

NOW WE ARE TALKING YEARS THAT IT HAS BEEN DEALING WITH LOW

SCORES.

>> AGAIN, SANTA FE AND COMPANY, THEY ARE NOT GOING TO

BE HERE BUT YOU CANNOT BLAME THEM FOR WANTING TO SEE

THROUGH WHAT THEY WANT TO DO WITH EDUCATION HERE.

SO I ASK AGAIN, WITH THE CLOCK RUNNING OUT, IS THERE TIME TO

COMPROMISE HERE ON THIS THING?

>> I THINK -- THIS IS CYNICAL BUT I THINK THAT GIVEN THE

CLOCK, IT MAY NOT BE -- MAYBE ONE OR MORE SIDES THINKS WE

DON'T HAVE TO, IF WE CAN KEEP THINGS MOVING ALONG, WE CAN

OBSTRUCT.

I DON'T MEAN TO SAY THAT I THINK APD -- APS, THANK YOU --

IS WRONG OR IS TAKING AN INCORRECT TACT, IT SEEMS TO

ME, THOUGH, THAT LOOKING AT THAT LIST, SOME OF THE

ELEMENTS ON THAT LIST, GOING TO A CHARTER SCHOOL, CLOSING

THE SCHOOL, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT REARRANGING THE DECK

CHAIRS HERE.

THE ONLY ONE THAT STRIKES ME AS BEING PROACTIVE AS REALLY

INVOLVING AN ATTEMPT TO FIX EDUCATION WITHIN THAT

COMMUNITY AND THAT CENTER IS THE ONE THAT APS IS ATTEMPTING

TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF. AND, TO SAY IT HAS TO HAPPEN

LIKE THIS, I THINK, WHEN I READ THAT AS SIMPLISTIC, BUT I

THINK IT IS TOO FAST.

IT IS EXPECTED BUT I ALSO THINK, YEAH, IT IS EXPECTED.

IT SHOULD TAKE A LITTLE TIME.

>> TOM, YOU MENTIONED WE WERE TALKING EARLIER, LOS PADILLAS

AND WHITTIER, TWO OF THE SCHOOLS I MENTIONED.

INTERESTING NOTE I THOUGHT WAS INTERESTING, PED PREVIOUSLY

REQUIRED THAT WHITTIER AND LOS PADILLAS BE RATED HIGHLY

EFFECTIVE OR EXEMPLARY.

THEY BACKED OFF OF THAT WHEN THEY REALIZED THAT IS NOT

GOING TO SOLVE IT.

WASN'T THAT THE BIG THING IN THE EDUCATION THING ALL ALONG,

TEACHERS WEREN'T DESIGNATED AT EXEMPLARY OR BETTER,

EVERYTHING WAS GOING TO TURN AROUND BUT IT DIDN'T.

WHERE DOES IT PUT THIS IDEA ABOUT EDUCATION REFORM AND HOW

THEY DO THIS WHOLE THING.

>> IT PLACES THE FOLKS ON EDUCATION REFORM AS NOT JUST

ABOUT TEACHERS AND PRINCIPALS BUT ABOUT THE COMMUNITY AND

HOW COMMUNITIES RESPOND TO HELPING, YOU KNOW, THE SCHOOLS

BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY THE STUDENTS SUCCEED.

YOU KNOW, WHAT I ENJOY ABOUT ALBUQUERQUE IS THAT YOU HAVE

ALL THESE UNIQUE COMMUNITIES THAT YOU JUST CAN'T GO IN WITH

A READY MADE SOLUTION.

THE READING PROGRAMS AT DESERT RIDGE WORK, SO, THEREFORE THEY

WORK AT POLK AND YOU CAN'T DO THAT.

THEY ARE VERY DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES AND I THINK THERE

HAS TO BE SOME FLEXIBILITY AND I THINK THAT IS ONE OF THE

LACK OF FLEXIBILITY IS ONE OF THE THINGS THAT PED HAS BEEN

CRITICIZED ON, BUT AT THE SAME POINT IN TIME YOU HAVE TO HAVE

A STANDARD THAT EVERYBODY IS GOING TO GET ANGRY WITH BUT

YOU HAVE TO HAVE SOMETHING TO MEASURE EVERYBODY BY.

>> GOOD POINT.

CURIOUS WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT THIS AS WELL, THE IDEA THAT

EVALUATING TEACHERS YOU NEED MORE THAN JUST TEST SCORES, WE

HAD THIS ARGUMENT HERE FOR A LONG TIME.

WE HAVE PEOPLE RUNNING FOR GOVERNOR ON BOTH SIDES OF THE

AISLE, I MIGHT ADD, SAYING TEACHER EVALUATIONS MAY NOT BE

THE BEST WAY TO GO.

DO YOU SEE THIS AS A CRACK HERE?

IS SOMETHING CHANGING IN THE DIALOGUE OF EDUCATION HERE

WITH THIS LITTLE DUST UP WE HAVE GOING?

>> IT SEEMS LIKE IT IS SHIFTING A LITTLE BIT BUT I

AGREE WITH WHAT TOM IS SAYING, THERE IS CULTURAL DYNAMICS NOT

FACTORED INTO PED.

SCHOOL DISTRICT IS DIFFERENT.

I WAS RAISED IN LAS CRUCES AND THE SCHOOL DISTRICT HERE IS A

DIFFERENT UNIVERSE.

I THINK THE KELLER ADMINISTRATION MIGHT BE

INTERESTED IN WORKING CLOSELY WITH PED AND WORK WITH

COMMUNITY LEADERS AND ADDRESS SOME OF THE SYSTEMIC ISSUES

WHICH DRIVES SOME OF THE SCHOOLS' FAILURE.

IT COMES DOWN TO THE MODEL AND THE SYSTEMS.

IF YOU TRY TO SUBSCRIBE TO A FAILING MODEL AND YOU'RE

WONDERING WHY NOBODY CAN MEET IT, IT IS KIND OF WEIRD BUT IT

IS CHANGING THE POLITICAL DISCOURSE AND IT IS SURPRISING

TO -- >> ARE YOU SURPRISED ONE OF

THE IDEAS IS TO TURN IT INTO A CHARTER SCHOOL?

>> YES.

>> DOES THAT HELP ANYTHING IN THIS WORLD.

>> IN NO WAY DOES IT HELP.

>> I AM NOT SURPRISED ONLY I THINK THAT IS SOMETHING THAT

MARTINEZ ADMINISTRATION ADVOCATES.

>> A LOT OF FOLKS ARE SAYING IT IS A BIT OF A TROJAN HORSE.

THEY WANT TO HAVE THEM FLIP INTO CHARTER SCHOOLS AND THIS

IS A WAY TO DO IT.

>> IT IS NOT THE MAGIC, TA DA, IT'S A CHARTER SCHOOL, NOW IT

WILL SUCCEED.

IT IS ASKING FOR A DIFFERENT, ADDITIONAL SET PROBLEMS.

>> THERE ARE INDEPENDENT CHARTER SCHOOLS AND APS

CHARTER SCHOOLS AND IT JUST PROVIDES MORE LATITUDE TO MAKE

DIFFERENCES OR CHANGES THAT THE DISTRICT OR THE PRINCIPAL

WANTS TO MAKE.

>> WE MUST APOLOGIZE TO PED FOR CALLING THEM APS AND VICE

VERSA.

I DO IT ALL THE TIME.

THAT IS ALL THE TIME WE HAVE.

YOU DID A GREAT JOB GUYS.

THANK YOU FOR JOINING US.

IF YOU WANT TO SHARE YOUR REACTION TO THIS WEEK'S TOPICS

GET IN TOUCH WITH US HERE AT NEWMEXICOINFOCUS.ORG.

For more infomation >> Episode 1147 | The Line: NM's Public Education Department And Failing Schools - Duration: 10:49.

-------------------------------------------

Pa. Officials Asking For Public's Help To Complete Memorial Honoring Vietnam Veterans - Duration: 0:32.

For more infomation >> Pa. Officials Asking For Public's Help To Complete Memorial Honoring Vietnam Veterans - Duration: 0:32.

-------------------------------------------

SCNC Public Safety Committee City Council Motion #18 0357 discussion 05 24 18 - Duration: 1:03:14.

hi everyone Craig Radow is my name I am Public Safety chair for

the Studio City Neighborhood Council and I am a board member so the the the

main purpose of the Neighborhood Council on the Studio City Neighborhood Council

is we serve as a bridge between the community and higher elected officials

we make recommendations and advise our councilmen the mayor the City Council on

a wide variety of concerning issues the okay this Public Safety Committee we

focus mostly on the areas of crime local law enforcement disaster preparedness

and general public safety issues that affect Studio City plus we work with the

Transportation Committee on traffic related public safety issues I'm

appointed by the President and we just have a new president of the studio city

neighbor council board Patrick Lewis he will begin his term at this coming at

the June meeting and to sit on the Public Safety Committee you don't

necessarily have to be a studio city neighborhood council board member so

yeah I encourage you to get involved and join us at at this committee meetings or

others and the Public Safety Committee is also lucky to have another layer of

advisors and support from cpap which is the community police advisory board who

join us at many meetings ron drescher heads that and he's here this evening

well we'll get it to cpabing a little bit and do address everyone and also

patty kirby sits on CPAP as well so let me read the motion as it stands now and

then we'll open up to the comments in regards to City Council motion let me

back up for one second I'm sorry what's going to happen with this with this

process right now so this motion starts in committee I we will vote on it

tonight if it passes it will move on to the full Studio City

Neighborhood Council board in June's meeting if that passes then it will be

submitted as a community impact statement that will be sent to of course

councilman Kerkorian the full City Council's and we send it to the mayor

and and that's where we provide our advisement

this this motion right here it could be tweaked you could make suggestions

tonight if we want to change the words but ultimately will will decide on the

the final motion as we want to present it okay so in regards to City Council

motion number 1803 57 presented by Councilman Paul Paul Kirk

Lorien the Studio City neighborhood council is strongly opposed to any

review assessment and/or development of the properties located at 1 1 to 2 0

Ventura Boulevard and 1 to 2 to 5 and Tura Boulevard in regards to providing

temporary or permanent homeless shelter storage facility and/or parking we are

facing a homeless epidemic in Los Angeles and we strongly recommend

finding appropriate shelter and mental health locations and less residential e

populated and local business driven neighborhoods will open it up to

comments and we'll start with Joshua's field

hi my name is Joshua Steele I've lived in Studio City for most of my life and

I'm speaking regarding agenda item 6 because I believe that homelessness is a

crisis across the LA area and the only way to address this crisis is to provide

services shelter and housing for the homeless in every neighborhood claiming

that the two sites in question on Ventura Boulevard are too close to homes

and businesses is not an excuse we're a densely populated city and we

have a moral obligation to support the homeless and furthermore I believe that

upper middle class and wealthy neighborhoods like Studio City don't get

to opt out of providing housing and services to the homeless thank you thank

you Mary Kenny

should I stay on sit please sit Thanks hi my name is Mary Keany I am a studio

city resident a full-time self-employed resident in my free time I run a small

nonprofit that encourages Angelenos to volunteer so I have personally worked

with la family housing and Downtown Women's Center and seeing the amazing

work that they're doing here in the valley I strongly support providing

housing services to people experiencing homelessness they are people

experiencing homelessness not just homeless people so they're our neighbors

thank you very much

Katherine

hello Catherine canto I've been living in Studio City for 34 years I examined

on the map where the proposed locations are and thus the handouts there there

there are some that are much larger some are just a little strip of land that I

don't think should be used for storage facility without oversight

I think the everything should be contained on one site having a storages

or shower facilities or safe parking without service providers just it will

increase our problem they they need to be

people need to be housed and they need to be they need to get their documents

in order they need to get everything sorted out before they can go on to the

next step which is their permanent supportive housing or housing of some

sort so that's what I see that we shouldn't have separate storage

facilities here a navigation Center there safe parking over here that it has

to be contained in one area thank you okay Thank You Irena Lefkowitz Lefkowitz

hi my name is Alina leftovers and I lived in Studio City since 1990 and I

never felt less safe that I feel now I used to walk my dog at night and I'm no

longer there because I feel that I can be attacked I'm sure other people feel

the same way I cannot go in the evening to Walgreens to fulfill my prescription

because that would be a homeless person standing there and that could be

attacked I don't feel safe in Studio City at all as per report of LAPD

officer Shannon Smith he encourages us to help him and let him know if there is

something suspicious going on and in general --he declares that the crime in

Studio City is declining and in my opinion this is not true I feel that the

crime in Studio City isn't a total rise and we have only one person protecting

us this is ridiculous I feel that the homeless people have more rights than us

I feel that they don't do their due diligence as we do as taxpayers to be on

a street first of all who can be on a street live on a street shower they do

their toiletries and expect us to pay the taxes for that that's ridiculous and

I feel that would be in proposed as a temporary shelter or the shelter on the

Tula Boulevard for storage or for some other I think this whole thing is a show

and I feel that you guys know it as well I do that the plan is preordained I feel

that it will happen and all this is just a talk and I don't mean to sound

sarcastic but I feel like as being in this movie studio is also sure I feel

that all of us neighbors should get together

and actively pursue a lawsuit against city of Los Angeles depriving us of our

right to live peacefully and enjoy our homes and don't feel afraid if God

forbid we did not turn on our nightly alarm and my disappointment was elicited

mayor City Council is beyond words and English is not even my second first

language its second but I think I share a motion of a lot of people who live

around me who live in Studio City who can no longer take their kids on a bike

rides because they will be needles around and God knows what and they just

homeless take over and what rights do they have to do that I know they need

help I am sure that these shelters that are proposed I'm going to be opened will

not need those drug people to the shelter I think these people cannot be

moved because they prefer to be where they are we can can easily get access to

their drug suppliers and this is going to be again pained by us and my

frustration is that I feel that this is already pre decided that's my point

Susan Caldwell please

thank you for letting me ask some questions do I need to send a special

sighs we cannot answer question um it's your time to make it public oh okay well

I came here predominantly for questions so then this will be my statement of

things we need to do I am certainly not against homeless shelters being provided

to the community clearly there's a need my issue that I do think believe is

wholly being ignored by Councilman Krekorian because he's not being

transparent with the community right now is in providing a plan

he needs to be providing to the community at this stage what the plan is

in the resources because that's really issue that I look to it to the Studio

City locations is are they able to house and resource the health and the safety

risks that are associated for it not only for the community but as well as

for the homeless and the indigent that are that are needed services for example

primary care they'll need primary care is that in any

way associated with these Studio City locations that hasn't been answered the

answer clearly will probably be not because they need to relocate them to

USC County for free care Martin Luther King all those are downtown LA who's

going to be their substance abuse intervener

which is required for anyone that understands what is required in

providing homeless care I'm very familiar with what's required you need a

primary care facility you need case managers to check to see how you're

doing we need behavioral health checking in

seeing how you're doing we need to see the drug intervenors to see whether or

not you're doing well or you need some more help those resources have to be

localized to where these emergency shelters which are high capacity and are

waiving the traditional rules obviously for this Ventura BOE of our location

those need to be answered and of course they haven't been and frankly if you

look at the schematic of this those two locations that's nowhere to be found so

I came here to answer ask questions and maybe it's premature but I'd like to say

that the councilman the city need to be providing those answers and they also

need to be providing which I really wanted tonight maybe it's again prema

sure is to know the feasibility study schedule who it's been assigned to and

what the protocol is for community input on that because obviously it implicates

health for the people health in the sidewalks

and if those reasons aren't there then obviously the homeless are going to move

beyond the shelter as they Panhandle they look for food elsewhere they look

for resources from the community you can't blame them but then we've been

foolhardy we haven't helped them and we've made

the community worse so if anything I can ask today or to put on what the same

agency shared with we'll make sure the councilman's office sees the video

tonight so if you have a question that you want to raise and point out and

that's every window then then those are the questions is who's the primary care

who's gonna be the case managers for this because they're set up and

established in Skid Row communities but they're not here where it's gonna be the

transportation line for that where is going to be in who which agencies

literally which agencies are going to be assigned the behavioral health for these

locations and when they say it's just a parking lot where people are living they

need behavioral health they need primary care they need case managers they need

substance abuse intervention yes so all of those facilities and resources that

allow the community to have input on a feasibility study are completely absent

they are not currently in this location the council men and the city quite right

now has been silent on those which makes a feasibilities study a bit of a sham

until those questions are answered and lastly but most importantly is what is

the protocol for the feasibility study to permit community input before that

study is finalized it is not a valid feasibility study for anyone that's

dealt with this and land-use issues it is not a valid feasibility study if

there is not a round table where people have an ability to respond and report

before that report is finalized either agreeing or disagreeing with the

responses of the community but right now that silent and those dates and

deadlines and opportunities need to be circulated to this community thank you

for letting me squeeze it

Thanks there's a lot of issues that I'd like to address here but in the interest

of time I think ahead two things in general in general I find some of the

previous commentators I'd like to speak to because I believe that they have a

moral responsibility to provide me with the automobile because I want one

similar to what they're advocating for this I'll be the first person to say

that councilman Corcoran has done good things for Studio City I've supported

him with many things this cement here you I'm so I'm sorry can you hear me

just louder if you if you want to sit more to the side and or stand over there

you could address both of us at the same time thank you they're saying councilman

Corcoran has done some good things for a studio city of this one strikes me as

very much a politically motivated proposal I believe that the councilman

has political aspirations just like our previous two mayor's have political

aspirations I think this will get him on the national stage I think this these

proposals do nothing positive for Studio City I believe that as much as homeless

people need help I believe what's going to end up happening if these these

facilities have put in place that we will continue to have several thousand

people living down by the river under bridges and stuff plus in addition to

that 50 100 200 in this housing this temporary housing as the previous

speaker spoke there doesn't seem to be any cogent plan to integrate these

people back into society this seems to be a permanent a permanent supportive to

support this kind of I'll say frankly antisocial lifestyle I believe there are

plenty of programs in place to help people who are I'll use the politically

correct term experiencing homeless who are the people who can be helped the

people who have lost their job have gone back what people who have been faced

with huge medical bills and become insolvent learning who are the victims

of abusive relationships that are running away from that those people can

be helped those people can be brought back into society I believe there are

programs in place to do that what I'm addressing is the hardcore homeless the

drug addicts the terminally mentally ill people which is what we have in Studio

City in droves and nowhere in this discussion do I see a distinction

between those that kind of spectrum of people I went to the councilman's of

Town Hall on the homeless in January and just heard reams of obviously specious

information statistics were brought forth I feel that statistics and studies

made by homeless advocates have about the same amount of credibility as

medical studies done by multinational pharmaceutical companies you know

statements have been made including very recently here tonight I read next-door

every day much to my detriment statements have been made these people

are your neighbors well you know if you want to bring out Webster's dictionary

and talk I suppose the guy who breaks into your

house and home invasion robbery is a member of your family or at least your

your roommate because they're in your house there

I'm sure if you work very very hard you could find somebody who's down by the

river there maybe you could find somebody who is an ex to do city

homeowner maybe it's often said that the homeless crisis is is a side product of

the housing expense in Studio City I've run into these people I'd walk by the

river I walk on the streets every day I sincerely doubt that the people I run

into are going well you know I could have bought that house in the silver

triangle for $900 but it went for 1.1 and it was just out of my face man we

usually like to keep it 2 minutes obviously we're going a little island

night so as we have a lot to go through if you okay so I will wrap it up I'm

strongly opposed to these show these up this proposal I agree with the previous

speaker that that this quote public process it's been said nothing's going

to be done with that public input I believe this is on the fast track to

happening and I think that the Studio City Neighborhood Council should as

strongly as possible protest this and we as a community need to look into

possibly further measures beyond that thank you very much

so I'm I wrote something up I'm going to read it and I'm quoting things I'm not

gonna read the sources although I have them if anyone wants them but I was

researching this is general quotes and information relating to the to-to-to

proposition and ordinance number one eight five four nine two which is the

permanent supportive housing ordinance the purpose according to Jose Huizar was

to quote provide homeless housing more equally throughout the city end quote

quote we've all got to do more to tackle homelessness including building

additional permanent supportive housing in our area of the city

end quote Paul Krekorian the to-to-to proposition and ordinance quote allow

permanent supportive housing projects to avoid reviews processes that can drag

out a year or more and expose the projects to public battles with

opponents and quote these laws allow homeless projects to quote avoid

environmental review and public hearings as long as the projects meet certain

requirements and quote according to the abundant housing la or the group

committed to advocating for more housing quote our politicized planning system

allows a few opponents to delay or veto badly needed homes this is why the

permanent supportive housing ordinance is a good law psh projects can proceed

without needing to go through an environmental review process require

approval from the City Planning Commission and City Council or face

legal challenges and delays under CEQ a and quote instead of a politicized

process where people who already have homes can go to meetings and try to stop

new dwellings for the homeless the psh ordinance requires common-sense

standards for design and construction and quote I would like to contrast this

with a statement by Paul Krekorian on next-door where he says quote rest

assured no decision will be made without an opportunity for the public to be

heard and quote just to be clear this motion only asked for a feasibility

study on city-owned properties and nothing more and quote I urge you to

withhold judgment at this early stage at best that's misinformation and it worse

it's completely deceptive I also want to note that they're talking

about that this is a citywide issue that must be geographical equity in where

services and shelters are placed according to the study by la I can cite

the study Studio City has 2.1 percent of the

homeless why does this call for geographical equity according to

councilmember harris-dawson insuring quote geographic equity would ease

pressure on council members quote I think all of us would get a lot of

relief if our constituents could pick up the paper and say oh this is happening

everywhere as opposed to quote why here compare this statement to Krekorian

quote we will be providing the people who are already living in the area was

secured and monitored shelter not inviting others in and quote there's no

language to that effect in the origin ordinance passed by the City Council I

also want to note as of the last meeting that I attended only two council members

had offered up any such sites the first was the Koreatown herb lesson and

Krekorian so when he says there will quote be similar temporary shelters

built in all 15 city council districts across the city he gives no evidence for

this and again they aren't temporary they're permanent so my questions to him

which I was hoping he would show up or his assistant Jessica would show up at

you know meeting like this are so are these sites different than the two to

two pledge and will they have relaxed limitations on height and density

reduced or no parking requirements will these be regulated under the California

Environmental Quality Act or any sort of environmental review and I have a

question as to why are the existing laws prohibiting the following behavior not

enforced at all camping on the street defecating and urinating in public

drinking alcohol and doing drugs in public littering and panhandling

Charlotte copy after hearing all this it's very hard to listen to I've been a

resident of Studio City for 28 years and I'd say in the past three I have seen

homeless people in Studio City more and more and more this was a lovely little

burg of a town people would call it the gem of the valley and when I heard what

was going on and I got into this late but I saw it on next door Thank You

social media I don't understand why this has not been publicized really

publicized and I don't understand where all where's all the paperwork for us to

read why are we voting on this I don't understand I want to fight this to the

end I want to be a part of that I appreciate that you may vote it down and

we'll see what happens but where's it gonna go from there

I also concur with those that went before me that said this is a done deal

in these times of politics this is a political decision being made very very

quickly as evidenced in the proposal that was just read that the normal real

estate regulations that any new shelter or building should be gone through are

going to be put aside so we can rush into this well no Studio City does not

want to rush into this Studio City might take our turned way down the line but

we're not starting here we're not gonna be the guinea pigs for

this and I mean I hope I speak for some others in the room if we have to take

this legally we will we shouldn't have to do this is still a democracy

Ron Drescher thanks Greg I'm talking as a members to residents to do City I'm I

am on the board a Police Commission and also co-chair of CPAP but I'm not

talking as a police official the homeless problem is ubiquitous some

quick statistics California has 12% approximately 12% of the population and

25% of the homeless LA City not county LA City has 10% of the population we

have about four million and there's 40 million in the state so we have about 10

percent of the population and 30 percent of the homeless this is not my quote but

this is quote from the councilmembers that about two-thirds of the homeless

are mentally ill many of them on drugs or alcohol issues I thought I've spoken

to many people from the Department of Mental Health they estimate 80% of the

homeless have mental issues the problem not now just from a crime standpoint

around any homeless encampment there's a huge increase in part one crime part one

crime is both property crime breaking in your homes breaking in your cars and

also violent crimes crimes against people and there's and I could I could

quote statistics but I know it were we have some time pressures but there's a

huge increase around homeless encampments the problem isn't the police

cannot police them away out of homeless there's really no enforcement you they

they collect they see somebody breaking in your car and they'll be out in one

day why because jails are overcrowded it was

mandated by the Supreme Court to reduce the amount of population in the

prisons we had 175,000 people in the prisons and we're down about 135 and we

can't just bring them back up so it's they feel impotent they can't enforce

the laws and we have a bee a bee I think it's 109 Proposition 47 57 which

reduces many of the crimes from felonies to misdemeanors drug possession and if

you still under nine hundred and fifty dollars it's a misdemeanor and they'll

be out within a day so I was on a ride-along last week four of the five

calls that we were were homeless related and unfortunately two of the cops always

go in twos black and whites are always in pairs they determine that these

people were either harmful to themselves or to the public so they had to drive

them to all of crest all of you and that took two cops well actually two separate

cops for hours out of commission there's only six cops typically six seven police

patrolling the area of all North Holly which was 25 square miles and you took

two of them out because of this solution yes it is a problem they need to be

housed but not in residential areas my suggestion is we house them in

industrial areas where there's no at nighttime you don't have the problems of

break-ins and and violent crimes committed so and then when you house

them that's only it's like a stool one of the problems is housing the second

problem is needing mental mental professionals there because there's so

many of them are you know and the third is you got to get them a job rehab and

you can put you can put like recycle nation plant or something so that's some

of them to start get back on their feet thank you

Carrie Johnson hi I'm Barry Johnson Studio City residents Association vice

president and I'm also a board member of Studio City beautification and we are

that we are an offshoot of the residence Association and we beautified the 1 1 2

2 O address with plants and a walkway some years ago that property was

condemned after the 94 earthquake nothing can be built there and even the

portion that we beautified is only like within 15 20 feet of Ventura the rest of

its like a 45 degree angle up I've been told already that there's no way the

city is going to put anybody there the reason it is on this list is because all

the council members had to come up with addresses that were owned by the city in

Los it in their council districts and the two that are in the flatlands of

Studio City or that and the parking garage I can tell you right now they are

never going to put homeless there because they will be looking out for the

homeless and saying oh my god if the dirt comes down and our earthquake

they'll be killed so don't worry they're not going to put them there it's just on

the list because we have to show our properties in Studio City regarding the

parking structure I've been told that it's only use would be parking of cars

not campers because of height restrictions between 9 p.m. and 6 a.m.

which is the ordinance that we are in right now for two years that will be

ending June 30th if you go online you can see all over Los Angeles where these

campers are allowed to park overnight between

and six they have to move after that they are generally in industrial areas

my last recollection of the math and studio city was we had virtually no

where they could park in Studio City although over the course of the two

years I don't think it's been well enforced I mean it's only been enforced

if people call it in but I think the only thing we are facing is put the

possibility of cars being allowed to park in that parking structure between

9:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. and then being asked to leave at 6:00 a.m. now who

police's that is another question I don't know there is a parking lot

attendant that comes in in the morning you know so but on the other hand you

know Studio City maybe has to do its 2-percent part and maybe that's our part

with that parking structure I don't know that's yet to be determined but anyway

as far as again the Oasis that's been beautified nothing's gonna happen there

it's it's like earth waiting to fall down so thank you very much thank you

let's Roman

hi is that spot on camera or only that's fun

I'm Lux Roman I'm I've been a studio city homeowner for 10 years and as

someone else mentioned I've also seen homelessness increase in this area

according to Lhasa in the last homeless count we have a thousand homeless people

in cd2 which includes us obviously in North Hollywood and I think Danites as

well a thousand people is a lot of people thirty percent of those people

are fleeing domestic violence ten percent are veterans I mean it's it's a

large population and it's our population also according to Lhasa the majority of

our homeless population in LA have lived in LA for over ten years which means

that they're not being bussed in from out of town that they lived here at one

point I don't think it's an option to not help this crisis I don't think it's

an option to push these services and housing to other neighborhoods that's

not working I go to several neighborhood council

meetings month the sentiment is the same at those meetings don't put it here put

it in another neighborhood if every neighborhood says that we cannot put it

anywhere we as voters 80% of LA approved measure HHH which is to build permanent

supportive housing permanent supportive housing is housing that includes

supportive services on-site so they have a live-in property manager that's our

24/7 they have mental health they have rehab I have veterans services they have

job training on-site for the residents those are operated by nonprofits and

they're getting our taxpayer dollars to do that we can't build that housing that

we all voted to set aside money for if we we don't allow them to build in our

neighborhoods I want to mention one thing on the parking there's an

organization called safe parking la they managed parking lots for people who

sleep in parking lots over night they have a security guard there the whole

time people in order to be the safe parking lot you have to have current

registration a current license you have to have a case

la family housing in this area and you have to be on a path to housing and you

have to renew the lease to be in that parking lot every month so it's not an

easy process and it's not like an open free-for-all there's actually a safe

parking lot in North Hollywood and it's not even at capacity I think there's a

couple people there it can it can have 15 people sleeping there overnight and

they can't even get that many people in there because of all the restrictions

same thing with supportive housing people in supportive housing and even in

temporary housing have responsibilities and it's not easy to get spots in

temporary housing I just want to say I'm fully in support of thank you Alex is

Vicky

I'm speaking as a resident just want to get clear um you know this is just

really strange I'm a real estate agent and obviously we have a crisis here

and I just don't understand why our city can't just do things naturally and

normally we have an area of the valley which is say Penn around the city which

has tons of vacant properties that have been dilapidated and and and not

occupied for I'd say Montgomery Ward about 35 years and I just don't

understand these are places that are perfectly suited to help the homeless

not because they're in cheap rent or high rent it's because well yeah it's

depressed there and the cost there to rent a space is a lot cheaper than say

here or Malibu or somewhere else it just doesn't make any sense

and I can only see this is just a a play for a councilman to to again grandstand

and campaign because basically if I were in charge I would say well let's look at

the map where can we put them let's put them here and stop with all of this

politicizing and trying to just garner a favor for the next political position we

want so what I would just ask our council office and I just asked all the

councilmen and women to get down to business take care of this get these

people housed get them off the streets and protect it but stop playing politics

this is about finding a place that will suit be suitable for them and at the

lowest cost because guess what we pay for all of this and as taxpayers just

because it's not their money doesn't mean that they don't have to take care

of it thank you

Fred Newman well I've lived in Los Angeles Santa Monica and Studio City and

I've seen over the past years the prolific proliferation of homelessness

it's overwhelming everybody's talking about it tonight but the detail I want

to talk about is this issue with mobile homes RV's over the past year or so all

over the city you see more and more than parked on

curbs in parking lots in neighborhoods I saw one ironically on Laurel Canyon

the other day was it was an oxymoron it was a mobile home someone who had been

living in for a long time parked and this is on the other side of Mulholland

on the west side of town with the Denver boot on it now it's not going to be

hauled away for months so that person could just continue to live in there the

Denver boot means nothing so my point is this and it goes over to what you said

neighborhoods people who live in homes condos rent apartments or whatever don't

want to live next to an RV camp that's not what they bought their homes for

moved in an apartment for those should those parking structures by the way RVs

don't fit in parking structures they're talking about cars for that but parking

lots for mobile homes should be in industrial areas and that's what you

were talking about earlier industrial areas they're usually empty at night

they're not around housing you don't have to worry about transient people and

the other thing is this to be careful of because people who live in mobile homes

whether they're five years old or 50 years old as long as they are plated

registered can say I'm not homeless I'm living in a mobile home so they can

separate themselves from this whole thing and then it becomes a whole legal

Arang dealing with a whole other category but the bottom line is don't

let the city put give parking areas in Studio City for RVs and mobile homes

that's insane put them in industrial areas

and the politicians need to know that

Jeff regard ya if there's any if some people came in a little later right now

he's the final speaker card I have so if there's additional speaker cards I think

the last two were given out or just raise your hand so we'll finish these

and then we'll go around quickly so I'm Jeffery Goddard and I've been a resident

of Studio City since 2001 homeowner very close to Ventura Boulevard in fact right

behind the Starbucks and Pier one Imports that big parking lot just right

over the hill so we get our full of that people are throwing trash over the wall

Thank You mitt you know for not realizing there's a house right over the

wall and right on the sidewalk whenever we my any of my wife myself or any of

our six kids go for walks to go buy some ice cream or something usually we see

two or three homeless and some of them screaming profanities at us today my

wife and I visited a couple of dozen shops and restaurants between Whitsett

and Laurel Canyon we talked to the managers and without exaggeration

everyone we talked to when they heard about the and it's amazing they didn't

seem to know much about these proposed shelters it was a shock to them so we

passed out we created letters of explaining our personal views have

observed the deterioration for the last 20 years in just recent years especially

how bad it's gotten when we walked a book star that little passageway between

the parking lot and good scar urination and death

occasion and some of the managers have right in the store there they're pooping

and urinating in the store and one look store owner said she has to spend 48

thousand dollars a year for security guard which can make or break a small

mom-and-pop that have invested their life savings you know what kind of

turnover we have but you see store after store going out of business and that

alone is enough to put them over the edge so speaking on behalf of these two

dozen store owners that we talked to in restaurants and some horror stories that

you know that store where they sell vintage posters and movie you know old

altered photographs that are framed that lady's been in there for 24 years

she said recently she was knifed by a homeless person knife and had and had to

call the police and it took them 45 minutes to arrive so and you heard about

that horrible thing that happened in Ventura County a man in the restaurant

right in front of his daughter and wife got killed by a homeless so you know I

recognized that that there needs to be advocates for the homeless but I as I

did some research Utah continues to be put out there as a as a one of the

states that has the lowest population in the last 10 years they I've seen some

numbers that say 91 percent they've decreased their homeless population

through certain measures and I won't take the time to go into them but Google

Utah homeless and you'll see the article after article about how they address

their homeless situation and so I would really hope that we could be mindful of

the store owners and homeowners that are right close to the boulevard there

especially and this is very alarming father of six kids and all of my kids

are either continued going to carpenter right now or Campbell Hall or Walter

Reed and and I we worked hard to afford a place that's safe for our children our

families over here the last point to make and the last point is remembering

the good old days vagrancy and hom intoxication public

intoxication vagrancy it was against the law and and and they would put them

either in work houses or on the roads so it made it so unpleasant that they they

dried out and they I know it sounds very old-fashioned you know that they dried

up and they it became so intolerable that they realized they've hit rock

bottom and they motive they're motivated to clean up their act because they don't

have cushy you know how and up said you know it was there was more expected of

them and self-esteem comes from you know there's two cities that are paying

homeless to clean up the streets so there's some self-esteem from work and

that gets their act together they don't just become dependent on handouts sorry

to go sorry for being late and thank you for allowing me to speak I don't want to

rehash a point that maybe was made before but I was told it hadn't been

sort of pointed out very much I just like to say for me and as a mom of three

here in Studio City I've done a lot of research because I want to be sending

the right message to my kids about the homeless I want to model the proper

values it's very important to me but I also have certain opinions especially my

husband and I both come from families with a lot of drug and alcohol abuse so

you know we we have a house full of recovery that we don't we're not in

favor of pot shops on every corner and stuff like that that's stuff that's

really impacted our families so perhaps we bring with it a certain opinion or

bias beforehand but I guess what I wanted to say is having done all this

research what I I've talked to the the path team for in downtown LA with the

police I've talked to our senior lead officer Sean Smith several times I

myself gone to LA family housing I looked into what opportunities my kids

could do this um and I come up with you know

interesting statistics that don't seem to be jiving with what I'm understanding

from councilman Krekorian Sophos most of these family most people who for

instance he talked so much in that sheet of paper about mothers and and kids

coming to this homeless shelter that I was seeing that's not the population

that we have mainly in Studio City and I've checked that with LA family housing

who said if they if there is a family and they're willing to abide by the

rules and come on in they can usually get them a bed within one day and then

within the past year my family and I were able to not really help or do

anything but at least assist and make sure that a homeless mom with two kids

that was up the venture and vineland Ralph's got into la family housing and I

actually she had said you know please check on me and I called and I checked

on her they said she's here she's doing great and that took two days so what I

wanted to say is I just feel that sometimes there is a trigger reaction of

not understanding the issues that surround homelessness it's very

complicated it's really as simple it's it's a mom and this shelter will just be

moms and kids that's not what my research has shown me and then the

really the point be that I would like to say is that until because of their my

research I've also had talks numerous talks at the LAPD who all are very

displeased with the lack of policing resources that we have in Studio City in

North Hollywood they have personally told me that they

are based on population metrics I know you guys all know this that reflect the

valley closer to the 1960s so that's the policing we have my senior lead officer

has said if anything short of anything really really really serious happens on

your black I will not be able to come I will not be able to help you with

somebody doing drugs on the sidewalk right by your house that I can't help

you like that there was a really bad dispute and your neighbor was kind of

like almost scary he was giving me examples I can't probably help you I'm

so sorry he said I'd like to be able to help you so that led me to call a

counselor and Krekorian Sophos previously who said well we haven't been

able to get those resources from the city and it's like what is this going

hey and I don't hear a commitment on Krekorian office or Kerkorian sparked to

get us the proper policing until we have the proper policing this is not a

conversation that we should be having and frankly I'm really angry though that

this is not a this is not already understood then you have people saying

well you must be someone that doesn't want to help people

no this is absolute logic until we have proper policing resources here there is

no business adding transitional or homeless shelters or anything else and

what is it going to take I called so I've called Krekorian office I've called

downtown Oh what I've gotten is yeah that's not gonna happen that's not gonna

happen this whose City is this so I would

really very much like to know in this kind of cycle of not being able to do

anything what what's gonna happen or I mean the people of the city the

taxpayers we have I guess no say I was also told very specifically oh thank you

I was also very specifically that kerkorian may not be very open to input

from us because this is a top agenda item so again this leads to the question

of who city is this is this Kerkorian city is a star city city or is this our

city and and this is where one has really gotten me you know what I mean as

the mom of three living in the city so thank you very much additional brief

comments Peter topic you're talking about but it's related so speaking to

your comments about mental illness and drug addiction for

homeless there was a representative from the mayor's office at the last student

City Board meeting that said seventy to seventy-five percent of the homeless are

I think it was a quote just like you and me and it was not it was about

everything I can give everybody the link watch the videos that's what I do so

it's I noticed that LAPD and the mayor's office are diametrically opposed in

their messaging as to what the issue is I contacted Meg Berkeley who is the HHH

homeless coordinator and this is she's overseeing that 1.2 billion dollar

measure how the money is spent and my personal passion is transparency and I

got involved a few years ago there was a project in my neighborhood lack of

transparency and I take my skills and audio-video I try to make sure that the

rest of the community can see videos hot-button topics that are important all

of us so I asked where can I see specifically I was looking for the prop

HHH Ministry of oversight committee meetings and the citizen Oversight

Committee meeting Steve recordings for this and there are new videos and other

14 that I was given two of them were recorded so you can actually hear them

the rest of them were on an iPhone off in the corner 1.2 billion dollar bond

measure oversight committees happening in the dark so if you want to see an LA

City Council meeting you can go on their website Brenna kiss you can watch the

video even Stu a keyword searching cue the video there I don't understand why

something that costs so much is in the dark last thing I believe it is Ron

Calgary when I heard never mentioned a few times that the

housing that they want to build costs between 400 and 600 thousand dollars we

want to about it yeah you ma'am yet at the comments yeah go ahead quickly I I

see that we all work very diligently and hard to have our goals and live in a

clean and safe place and residents and because this the city is very well goal

orientated it's not cheap to live here and for to allow people who obviously

have a need to for a wellness maybe they need shower and food and and a purpose

and an education to develop skills to maintain a sustain of it's important for

their needs but I think in our city it's it doesn't mix well with what we've

created here in Studio City to look alike it's very important to give them a

place to stay have a place to sleep where they could be safe with maybe so a

security thing a lock cabinet for their valuables that gives them a place to

have a shower and food and the medical attention they need away from this

community would be best maybe where all of them are sent to and

where if they get financial aid the financial aid is forfeited to the

facility and if they want their freedom that we've all worked so hard for they

get to earn it and have pride in earning it so they would be given allowed to

attend a course that allows to facilitate them back into the community

for those maybe twenty percent who are eligible for that and for the other

people they will stay and maintain and get their health care until they are

able to facilitate but by if I don't know if they get financial aid I'm not

familiar with it but if they do get money and stuff they just buy drugs and

alcohol and it just it they're not rehab --all so they need the ability to rehab

where they able to get sleep nutrition so they can function better but it's not

fair for them because they're there they're ill they need medical attention

they they wander they're passed out on streets I saw one back to burn himself

up and all the resources for city police officers are being used to please these

people instead of keeping our safes clear is that what we do our city

dollars are all around the homeless and it's not fair to them because they need

attention but they're going to neglect it because we played taxes and deserve

our protection as well so thank you your name please

and your name ma'am once again this is your common time they are covering a

similar story in Korea

okay so we're gonna move on to vote now first the committee members have a

moment to make the comments address anything that was said and a community

member you know just an I'm in total agreement

I I live with it every day myself I've lived on my wife so Marsha well I would

say that that our committee is working on a proposal explaining the dire need

to expand the police presence in our community and that is part and parcel of

dealing with problem that we have the only with the transient community and I

think that's step one that we have to be very aggressive and I think we have to

have a protest at City Hall as a community and we left oh maybe we should

have one of our public safety committee meetings there because they could see

this is a huge turn up for for this for the small burg someone called it a bogus

of village this is a this is a catastrophe and I think we should

consider that thank you much

I just want to remind you that this motion is specifically for these two

properties so we're not addressing all of the comments which we will be

addressing and we feel behind and understand all of the opinions so that's

what we're going to be voting on now is just the this small port part of these

two addresses do you think we should

no no yet we're repositioning that motion as we speak based on some input

tonight and again it's just it's just the first step that we're making tonight

there will be many more discussions and hopefully the same number of people will

attend or more yeah so well right now the sentences Studio City neighborhood

councils strongly opposed to any review assessment and our development of the

properties located at one one two two zero Ventura Boulevard twelve two two

five into our Boulevard and any additional location in Studio City make

it a little broader language I have the

in the original motion in the original council motion its 11220 Ventura

Boulevard and twelve two to five and turbo of art from the quarry oh okay

alright so we're gonna vote vote on it with that friendly amendment

so oh yes so three votes to pass and then we'll

move on to the Studio City neighborhood council full board will go down Marsha a

yes says you're strongly opposed a no is the opposite yes

Patrice Berlin's daddy Kurt yes and myself yes okay there you have it 4-0

and we'll move on to the full board

yeah so the the next studio City Council full board meeting I'm gonna pull it off

so I give you the exact date like I said it's the third Wednesday of every month

so it will be on June 20th and this will be on that agenda to weigh in and thank

you for coming out tonight there are other agenda items including

fireworks but I do understand if you have to get going

For more infomation >> SCNC Public Safety Committee City Council Motion #18 0357 discussion 05 24 18 - Duration: 1:03:14.

-------------------------------------------

MP's ex-aide subjected to 'cruel public shaming' as jury take less than an hour to acquit him of - Duration: 1:41.

A former special adviser to Sir Michael Fallon who was acquitted of sexual assault has said he was cruelly and publicly shamed during a trial that he claims should never have come to court

  Richard Holden said it was a "travesty" that the case against him had been pursued and it added to concerns about the actions of the police and Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)

He had been accused of groping a woman under her skirt at a party in London in 2016

The jury of eight men and four women returned unanimous verdicts after deliberating for less than an hour

  Mr Holden said the jury were sent to lunch on Friday at 12.37pm to return to start their deliberations at 2pm

By 2.15pm, he was proved innocent. .

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét